m. amann, w. sch öpp, j. cofala, g. klaassen
DESCRIPTION
M. Amann, W. Sch öpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen. The RAINS-GHG Model Approach Work in progress. Introduction of GHGs into RAINS. Task: Develop cost curves for GHGs (CO 2 , CH 2 , N 2 O, CFC, HFC, SF 6 ) in addition to SO 2 , NO x , VOC, NH 3 , PM, (BC, CO) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
M. Amann, W. Schöpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen
The RAINS-GHG
Model Approach
Work in progress
Introduction of GHGs into RAINS
Task:
• Develop cost curves for GHGs (CO2, CH2, N2O, CFC, HFC, SF6) in addition to SO2, NOx, VOC, NH3, PM, (BC, CO)
• Country-by-country, medium-term up to 2030
Challenges:
• How to capture linkages in emissions, controls, impacts, and instruments?
• How to model structural changes?
Traditional RAINS optimization
• Decision variables: segments of pollutant-specific cost curves
• No interaction between pollutants
• Cost curves fixed for given energy structure, no structural change possible
New decision variables
Decision variables:Amounts of economic activities controlled by a given abatement measure k (acti,k)
– Each technical measure represented as a variable
For each activity class i:
Σ acti * effj = total activity
– Derived from an exogenous baseline scenario– E.g., demand for useful energy (transport volume)– Kept constant in RAINS calculations
Emission- and cost calculation
Emission calculation:
Σ acti,j * emission factori,j,l = total emissionsl
– For each pollutant l – Emission factors include effects of controls – Captures multi-pollutant effects of individual measures
Cost calculation:
Σ acti,j * cost coeffi = total costs
– Cost coefficients describe costs for each technology, not allocated to a specific pollutant
– Serves as objective function in optimization
Efficiency improvements and fuel substitution
Efficiency improvements:
eff > 1 in Σ acti * eff = total activity
. or: Σ acti + sav = total activity
Fuel substitution (e.g., coal gas): – Decision variable fs:
Σ acti * eff + fs = total coal use
Σ acti * eff - fs = total gas use
Costs and applicability limits derived from sensitivity runs of full energy model!
Environmental constraints
Air quality:
Σ emissions i * transfer functionik target levelk
– For each receptor k– For deposition, air quality, health effects, etc.– Simultaneous constraints for multiple effects
Greenhouse gases (l):
Σ emissions il * Xl emission ceiling
– For each country or groups of countries– For each GHGs or a basket of GHGs– Xl : weighting factor (GWP) or function (radiative forcing)
Carbon trading
Between countries: Σ actbuy * emission factorCO2 - trade total CO2,buy
Σ actsell * emission factorCO2 + trade total CO2,sell
– Also possible for other GHGs/basket of GHGs
Buying C from the world market:
Σ actbuy * emission factorCO2 - trade total CO2,buy
Σ other costs + trade * C price = total costs
Pollution taxes:
Σ other costs + Σ emissionsl * taxl = total costs
Costs and benefits
Simplifications:• Temporal aspects (reflected by constraints)• Substitution options (reflected by constraints)
Gains:• Capture full interaction between pollutants• Allow systematic exploration of co-benefits • Enables full integrated assessment of air pollution and
climate change
Requirements:• Link to full energy model to derive limits• Embed in long-term energy/climate scenarios
SO2 NOx NH3 VOC
Primary PM+BC
Acidification
Eutrophication
Ground-level ozone
Health impacts via sec. aerosols
CO
CO2+ GHGs
Radiative forcing via aerosols via OH
A multi-pollutant/multi-effect problem
Conclusions
• Work in progress
• Building, as far as possible, on reviewed RAINS databases and UNFCCC information
• Cooperation with climate modelling community welcome
• Methodology and implementation to be completed by late 2004
• Further workshops at IIASA to discuss details and review progress