lssip year 2015 - released issue

Year 2015 - Level 1

EUROCONTROL

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SLOVAKIA

LSSIP Year 2015 Slovak Republic Released Issue

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

LSSIP for Slovak Republic

Infocentre Reference: 16/01/29-87

Document Identifier Edition: Year 2015

LSSIP Year 2015 Slovak Republic Edition Date: 04/04/2016

LSSIP Focal Point – Mr. Augustin Lamprecht

E-mail: [email protected] LPS

LSSIP Contact Person – Mrs Agnieszka Dybowska

E-mail: [email protected]

Unit DPS/PEPR

Status Intended for

Working Draft General Public

Draft Agency Stakeholders

Proposed Issue Restricted Audience

Released Issue

Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)

Path: Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Slovak Republic (SK) - AD\Year 2015\Released\LSSIP Year 2015_Slovak Republic Released.docx

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material

2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2015 http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

3 European ATM Portal Working - https://www.eatmportal.eu/working

Public - https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ 4 ESSIP Report 2014 http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

5 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

6 Acronyms and abbreviations

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

8 National AIP http://aim.lps.sk/web/?fn=1&lng=sk

9 FAB Performance Plan Not available yet. Document was properly coordinated and approved on the FAB CE State level and sent to the European Commission in due time. Waiting for final approval by the European Commission.


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2015 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan – Edition 2015.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1

Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4

Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geographical Scope ................................................................................................................. 5

1.1.1 International Membership ..................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) ................................................................................ 5 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ............................................................................ 7

1.2 National Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 7 1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) .................................................................................................................. 8 1.2.2 ANSPs ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.2.3 Airports ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.2.4 Military Authorities .............................................................................................................. 13

Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity ............................................................................................................ 16 2.1 Evolution of traffic in the Slovak Republic .............................................................................. 16 2.2 BRATISLAVA ACC ................................................................................................................ 17

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011-2020 ................................................................... 17 2.2.2 Summer 2015 performance ............................................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 - Summer ............................................................................... 18

Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ........................................................................................ 20

Chapter 4 - National Projects ................................................................................................................. 21

Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ....................................................................................................... 23 5.1 FAB Co-ordination .................................................................................................................. 23 5.2 FAB related Projects .............................................................................................................. 24 5.3 Regional Projects ................................................................................................................... 27

Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ........................................................................................ 28 6.1 Conventions ........................................................................................................................... 28 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress .......................................................................... 29 6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ............................................ 49

ANNEXES

LSSIP Year 2015 Slovak Republic 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

The Slovak Republic as an EU member is applying all ATM regulations adopted by EU and related legal acts prepared by EASA. No important changes have occurred during the past year.

Traffic and Capacity

Calculation of the Slovak capacity target is based on the latest STATFOR forecast of annual traffic growth and planned technical improvements of the ATM system. Delay targets correspond to an objective capacity increase during RP2

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Value Value Value Value Value

0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10

Bratislava/M. R. ŠTEFÁNIK Airport has never experienced and is not expected to experience in the future ATFM arrival delay, therefore the national target is set to 0 min.

ESSIP Objective Implementation

The level of ESSIP Objective implementation is adequate, many Objectives have been implemented in accordance to the ESSIP Plan, the others are planned to be implemented in time. There are some minor Objectives, which are either considered as not applicable or applicable with short delay. The main reason for Not applicable Objectives is low traffic density, which does not justify an automation.

The justification for delay of three Objectives is below:

Implementation of the Objectives ITY-ADQ is late due to complexity of the Regulation (EU) No 73/2010. The working group was established, which is preparing the methodology guidance on meeting the requirements of the ADQ Regulation, which shall act as a national methodology applicable in the area of civil aviation of the Slovak Republic. The web based application AIM Web Portal will be launched in 2016.

With regard to objectives ITY-AGVCS2 activities related to extension of 8,33 channel spacing below FL 195 are in progress. Working group for safety case study has been established and is envisaged to be completed by 2016. Stakeholders will be kept informed.

Fulfilment of ITY-AGDL and ITY-COTR objectives has been incorporated into the specification of requirements on the E2000 system upgrade. The project plan for E2000 system upgrade has been postponed due to procurement issues.


LSSIP 2015 - Slovak Republic

* FOC Date

█ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

State-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

*

AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management

*

AOM21.1 Implementation of Direct Routing [PCP]

[E] *

AOM21.2 Implement Free Route Airspace [PCP]

[E] *

AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions

*

ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2

*

ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2

*

ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2

ATC12.1 Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring

*

ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1

*

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS

*

COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM

*

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services

*

FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning

*

FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1

FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [PCP]

[E] *

FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment [PCP]

[E] *

INF04 Implement integrated briefing

*

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD)

*

ITY-ACID Aircraft identification

ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

*

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285

*

ITY-AGVCS2 Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195

*

ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes

*


LSSIP 2015 - Slovak Republic

* FOC Date

█ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP)

*

ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability

*

NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV

NAV10 Implement APV procedures

*

SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements

*

SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions

*

Airport-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

LZIB-Bratislava Airport

AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1

AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2

AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

AOP10 Time Based Separation [PCP]

[E]

AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan [PCP]

[E] *

AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring

[PCP]

[E]

ATC07.1 Implement AMAN tools and procedures

ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements

ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports

Understanding the Table

Objective Completed No Plan

Objective Partly Completed Missing Data

Objective Planned Not Applicable (Slovakia does not participate in this obj.)

Late

E= Essential – Master Plan Reference PCP = Pilot Common Project

Note: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document - Year 2015 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2015.

The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;

Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;

Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Co-ordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;

Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.

Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment

1.1 Geographical Scope

1.1.1 International Membership

Slovak Republic is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC June 1991

EUROCONTROL 1997

European Union 2004

EASA May 2004

ICAO 1947

NATO March 2004

ITU February 1993

1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s)

Bratislava FIR is defined as an airspace over the Slovak Republic within the state boundary.

Bratislava FIR consists of Controlled Airspace and Uncontrolled Airspace.

Provision of service: H24

Controlled Airspace:

Bratislava CTA

- Airspace outside CTR/TMA from 8 000 ft AMSL (10 000 ft AMSL within lateral limits of TMA 4 Poprad) to FL 660; ATS provided by Area Control Centre

- Bratislava CTA can be divided laterally and/or vertically up to 5 controlling sectors

- Class of airspace: C

CTR/TMA (see enclosed map)

- Class of airspace C or D, ATS provided by appropriate approach and/or tower units

Uncontrolled Airspace:

- Airspace outside CTR/TMA from GND to 8 000 ft AMSL (10 000 ft AMSL within lateral limits of TMA 4 Poprad), FIS provided by Flight Information Centre

- Class of Airspace: G

In terms of route structure, Bratislava FIR is divided to Lower Airspace (GND/FL 245) and Upper Airspace (FL 245/UNL).


The following map shows the geography ical situation of the Slovak airspace.


1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation

Outside OPR HR of Piešťany TWR the airspace classification of Piešťany CTR and TMA is changed from D to G.

Outside OPR HR of Tatry TWR the airspace classification of Tatry CTR and Poprad TMA 1 and TMA 2 is changed from D to G and the airspace classification of Poprad TMA 3 and TMA 4 is changed from D to C.

Outside OPR HR of Žilina TWR the airspace classification of Žilina CTR and TMAs up to 8000 ft is changed from D to G, above that level from D to C.

Outside OPR HR of Sliač APP/TWR the airspace of Sliač CTR and TMA becomes restricted/temporary reserved airspace.

1.2 National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in the Slovak Republic are the following:

The Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic (MoT SK);

The Transport Authority (TA) in its independent function of National Supervisory Authority (NSA SK) in accordance with EU legislation and Aviation Act of the Slovak Republic;

Aviation and Maritime Investigation Authority (AMIA);

Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik, v skratke LPS SR, š. p. (LPS SR, š. p), a state enterprise, designated for provision of air navigation services;

Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMÚ), designated for provision of Meteorological services;

The Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic - Air Force of the Slovak Republic (MoD SK- VzS OS SR) designated for provision of ATS at Sliač Airport;

Letisko M. R. Štefánika – Airport Bratislava, a.s. (BTS);

The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) of the Ministry of Defence.


Note: the Functions of National Supervisory Authority (NSA) in accordance with EU Reg. No 549/2004 is performed by the following authorities1:

The Transport Authority - section of air navigation services and aerodromes.

Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic, Directorate General of the Civil Aviation and Water Transport.

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. More detailed charts are presented in Annex B.

1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)

1.2.1.1 General information

Civil Aviation in the Slovak Republic is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic (MoT SK).

The regulatory entity under the structure of MoT SK in Civil Aviation is the Directorate General of Civil Aviation and Water Transport. It is (among other functions in civil aviation) responsible for:

state transport policy in Civil Aviation;

representing state in international civil aviation organisations;

monitoring of state supervision in Civil Aviation;

1 http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/single_european_sky/doc/nsas-in-the-context-of-ses.pdf


legislation and regulatory process;

designation of Air Navigation Services Providers.

The Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic (MoD SK) is responsible for the process of national military aviation legislation and regulation of military aviation in general. MoD SK is responsible for handling of military air traffic in reserved areas for state military aircraft (licensing of military ATCOs). The Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic for these purposes delegated certain responsibilities to the Military Aviation Authority (MAA).

The Ministry of Interior of the Slovak Republic is responsible for regulation of state aircraft other than military aircraft.

The Transport Authority (TA) has been established as a legal successor of the Civil Aviation Authority of the Slovak Republic with effect from 1st of January, 2014. The TA is an independent institution represents the Slovak Republic at EASA, performs some tasks on behalf of European Aviation Safety Agency and fulfils the role of National Supervision Authority for SES purposes (NSA). The TA is responsible for but not limited to:

TA certification of Air Navigation Services Providers,

certification of systems used or intended to use by Air Traffic Services Providers, Aeronautical Telecommunication Services Providers, Aeronautical Information Services Providers and Meteorological Services Providers,

licensing of Air Traffic Services Personnel,

performance monitoring of Air Navigation Services,

supervision of Air Navigation Services.

MoT SK acts as an economic and market regulator in the civil aviation.

In general, the MoT SK is responsible for preparation, transposition and implementation of legal rules. The TA acts as advisory body in this process, as well as, according to the Civil Aviation Act, it has a legislative initiative.

The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible

Legal Basis

Rule-making MoT SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act (143/1998 as amended)

Safety Oversight TA (NSA) EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

MoT SK

TA

EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Airspace MoT SK and MoD SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Economic MoT SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Environment MoT SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Security MoT SK, TA EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Accident investigation AMIA EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements: TA is acting as certifying authority and MoT SK as designating authority. Enforcement actions are linked accordingly to scope of responsibility.

Airspace: Major changes of Airspace are associated with mutual co-ordination/approval of MoT SK and MoD SK.

Security: MoT SK is responsible for international security activity. TA is responsible for assessment of security programmes, supervision of organizations which are obligated to have security processes in place, assessment of background check of individuals. Detailed description of tasks and responsibilities are published in National Aviation Security Programme which is published as special Attachment to national version ICAO Annex 17.


1.2.1.2 Administration in the Civil Aviation of Slovak Republic

MoT SK and TA are institutionally separated from ANSPs.

In general the MoT SK is responsible for preparation, transposition and implementation of legal rules. The TA acts as advisory body in this process, as well as, according to the Civil Aviation Act, it has a legislative initiative and it adopts manuals and procedures for executive activities. TA main responsibility is safety and security oversight of ANSPs.

For ATM safety regulation, the responsible body is MoT SK (Directorate General of Civil Aviation and Water Transport) and for executive manuals and procedures, the responsible body is TA along with deep responsibility of safety oversight and licensing procedures.

MoT SK Annual Report published:

Y http://www.telecom.gov.sk/index/index.php?ids=125836

TA Transport Authority Y http://nsat.sk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/V%C3%BDro%C4%8Dn%C3%A1-spr%C3%A1va-D%C3%9A-za-2014.pdf

An organisational Chart is shown in Annex B.

Web addresses:

MoT SK: www.mindop.sk

TA: www.nsat.sk

1.2.2 ANSPs

Services provided

LPS SR, š. p. Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik, v skratke LPS SR, š. p., (LPS) has been entrusted for provision of air navigation services under the Slovak Laws since January 1993 and being designated as ANSP in 2006. LPS, state enterprise, is acting as a commercial entity.

The Supervisory Board of LPS SR comprises members who are selected by the MoT SK and members elected by LPS employees, to maintain the majority of the State representation.

The mission of LPS is in the following domains:

Air Traffic Services Operations;

Aeronautical Telecommunication Services;

ATS Infrastructure Operation, Maintenance, and Development;

Aeronautical Information Management, including Aeronautical Information Services;

Air Traffic Services Safety and Quality;

Search and rescue co-ordination;

Administrative and finance.

Name of the ANSP: Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik , v skratke LPS SR, š. p. (LPS)

Governance: State enterprise Ownership: Slovak Republic

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS Y


CNS Y

MET N

ATCO training Y

Others N/A

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

Y HU

Annual Report published: Y http://www.lps.sk/docs/vyrsprava2014.pdf

LPS website: www.lps.sk


Slovenský hydrometeorologický ústav (SHMÚ) Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMÚ) has been entrusted for provision of meteorological services under the Slovak Laws since January 1993 and being designated as Met Service Provider in 2006 and re-designated in 2013. SHMÚ is state subsidised organization operating under the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic.

Name of the ANSP: Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMÚ)

Governance: State organisation Ownership: Slovak Republic


ATC en-route N

ATC approach N

ATC Aerodrome(s) N

AIS N

CNS N

MET Y

ATCO training N/A

Others N/A



N

Annual Report published: Y http://www.shmu.sk/sk/?page=1714,

More detailed annual report is available for NSA

SHMU website: www.shmu.sk

MoD- Air Force of the Slovak Republic (MoD- VzS OS SR) MoT re-designated MoD- VzS OS SR for provision of air navigation services in June 2013 .VzS OS SR is providing ANS at Sliač Airport as the military provider fulfilling civil aviation regulations.

Name of the ANSP: MoD- Air Force of the Slovak Republic (MoD- VzS OS SR)

Governance: State organisation Ownership: Slovak Republic


ATC en-route N

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS N At Sliač Airport provided by LPS

CNS Y

MET N At Sliač Airport provided by Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute


ATCO training Y Only unit training, other types of training are provided LPS

Others N/A



N

Annual Report published: N

1.2.2.1 ATC systems in use

FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales Air Systems

Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2018 - 2019

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? -

ATC Unit ACC Bratislava, APP/TWR Štefánik

SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: EUROCONTROL

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2018

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? -

ATC Unit ACC Bratislava, APP/TWR Štefánik

The ATC units in the Slovak Republic airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route TMA

Bratislava ACC 5 + 1** AT, CZ, PL, UA, HU

Štefánik APP/TWR 1 AT, HU + 1 TWR for Bratislava M. R. Štefánik Airport

Košice APP/TWR 1 HU + 1 TWR for Košice Airport

Tatry TWR 1 PL Incl. TWR for Poprad-Tatry Airport

Piešťany TWR 1 N/A Incl. TWR for Piešťany Airport

Žilina TWR 1 CZ Incl. TWR for Žilina Airport

Sliač APP/TWR 1 N/A + 1 TWR for Sliač Airport

1.2.3 Airports

1.2.3.1 General information

The main airports/aerodromes in the Slovak Republic are:

Letisko M. R. Štefánik - Bratislava Airport, Košice Airport, Piešťany Airport, Sliač Airport, Poprad-Tatry Airport and Žilina Airport. They all are international airports for public use.

All above-mentioned airports are joint stock companies. Ownership differs on individual airports and stakeholders are usually municipalities, regional governments, MoT SK and private companies.

2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))


1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the ESSIP Plan – Part I Section 4, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives.

So the following airport is covered in this LSSIP: Bratislava Airport.

Note: Traffic density at Bratislava Airport does not require implementation of all Objectives as they are defined for the Airports listed in the ESSIP Plan. In such cases N/A is used. Nevertheless all above mentioned Objectives are carefully monitored and unimplemented as appropriate.

1.2.4 Military Authorities

The Military Stakeholders involved in ATM in the Slovak Republic are composed of:

Military Aviation Authority of MoD (MAA);

Armament Department of MoD;

Air Force of the Slovak Republic (VzS OS SR).

They report to the Ministry of Defence.

Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.


1.2.4.1 Regulatory role

MAA is established by the Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic, which is responsible for safety oversight of military aviation and, participate on regulatory functions.

Regulatory framework and rule-making

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N

Level of such legal provision: State Law (Act 143/1998 as amended §46 and §48a)

Level of such legal provision: State Law and EU legislation.

Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, the Chairman of the Parliament and the President of the Slovak Republic

Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, the Chairman of the Parliament and the President of the Slovak Republic and EU structures.

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N

OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination N

ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N

ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing N

ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification N

ANSP Oversight Y ANSP Supervision N

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: N/A Additional Information: N/A

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:


Oversight

1.2.4.2 Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

Y If YES, since: June 2015 Duration of the Certificate:

2 years

Certificate issued by: TA If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

N/A

Additional Information: Certification of providing of ANS for GAT on the Sliač Airport was completed.

1.2.4.3 User role

National AIP Y National AIP N/A

National Military AIP N/A National Military AIP N/A

EUROCONTROL eAIP Y EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A

Other: None Other: None

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: MAA SK National Supervisory Authority (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: TA

Additional information: N/A Additional information: N/A

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En-Route Y OAT Unit ATC en-route N

Approach/TMA Y ATC Units /VzS OS SR ATC approach, LZSL Y

Airfield/TWR/GND Y ATC Units /VzS OS SR ATC aerodrome, LZSL Y

AIS N AIS N

MET Y MET N

SAR Y VzS OS SR SAR Y

TSA/TRA monitoring

Y AMC FIS Y

Other: None Other: None

Additional Information: Tactical co-ordination with Air Defence (AD) unit

Additional Information: Military launched the provision of ANS for GAT at the Sliač Airport as from June 2011.

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y


1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Y

Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges N

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF Y

CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 N Mode S Y ACAS Y

Others: Mode S except fighter aircraft

Military in the Slovak Republic applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity

2.1 Evolution of traffic in the Slovak Republic

2015

Traffic in Slovakia increased by 5.9% during Summer 2015 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2014.

2016-2020

The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual increase between 1.8% and 5.9%, with a baseline growth of 3.9% during the planning cycle.

0

100.000

200.000

300.000

400.000

500.000

600.000

700.000

2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F

IFR

flig

hts

Slovakia - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast

2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F

H 7.6% 8.3% 5.7% 5.0% 4.8% 5.6% 4.5%

B -0.3% 4.4% 9.8% 7.1% 5.8% 3.4% 3.5% 3.2% 3.5% 2.8%

L 6.5% 2.7% 0.9% 1.6% 1.7% 1.9% 1.2%

ESRA08 B -2.4% -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.7% 1.8%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2015)IFR flights yearly growth

Slovakia


2.2 BRATISLAVA ACC

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011-2020

2.2.2 Summer 2015 performance

Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity

gap Ref value Actual

+5.7 % 130 (+9%) 0.15 0.12 No

The average en-route delay per flight decreased to 0.12 minutes per flight in Summer 2015.

75% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 22% for weather.

Capacity Plan +3% Achieved Comments

Improve accuracy of airspace booking Yes

From ANSP perspective no influence on this

Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes STAM trial completed

Continuous improvements of the route network and sectorisation Yes

Enhanced sectorisation according to the FABCE Yes

SYSCO Yes

Continuous recruitment to increase staff level Yes

Mode S Yes

Optimisation of sector opening times Yes

New sector configurations Yes

Maximum configuration: 5 sectors Yes 5 sectors

Summer 2015 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 130, 9% higher than in 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 128 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 111.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Peak Day Traffic 1504 1553 1563 1924 1832

Summer Traffic 1213 1217 1276 1419 1500

Yearly Traffic 1006 1004 1055 1161 1233

Summer Traffic Forecast 1539 1599 1649 1699 1763

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 1575 1670 1754 1833 1938

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 1488 1503 1527 1562 1581

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.12

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.08

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

LZBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2015 to 31/10/2015


2.2.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 - Summer

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values LZBBCTA 2016 2017 2018 2019

Annual 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10 Summer 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.15

Capacity Plan

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Free Route Airspace Free Route DCTs within

LZBB

Free Route Concept gradual implementation for FAB CE

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

Implement Rolling

ASM/ATFCM process

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Cooperative Traffic Management

Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM

Airspace Continuous improvements of the route network and sectorisation

Enhanced sectorisation according to FABCE airspace plan

Procedures

Staffing Continuous recruitment to increase staff level

Technical AGDL HW/SW Upgrade

Capacity

Optimisation of sector opening times

East/West sector

configuration

Significant Events

Max sectors 5 6 6 6 7

Capacity increase p.a. 5% 2% 2% 0% 2%

Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 0% N/A

Profile – Current routes 2% 2% 4% 2% N/A

Additional information

H 130 0% 130 0% 130 0% 131 1%

Ref. 130 0% 130 0% 130 0% 130 0%

L 130 0% 130 0% 130 0% 130 0%

Open 130 0% 130 0% 130 0% 130 0%

C/R 130 0% 133 2% 138 4% 141 2%

Capacity ProfilesProfiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)

LZBB 130

ACC2015

baseline 2016 2017 2018 2019


2016-2020 Planning Period Outlook

No structural lack of capacity is foreseen for Bratislava ACC for the period 2016-2020. Continual increase of capacity is covered mainly by improving of flow and capacity management techniques, optimizing sector configuration and sector opening times, increasing available sectors and introducing system changes that decrease workload of ATCOs. Continuous recruitment of additional controllers is in progress, in order to maintain sufficient level of operational staff.

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

2016‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 130 130 130 130

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 130 130 130 130

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 130 133 138 141

Capacity Profile ‐ High 130 130 130 131

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 130 130 130 130

Capacity Baseline 119 130

2016 ‐ 2020 Plan 137 140 143 143 146

50

70

90

110

130

150

170Cap

acity profile (movements per hour)

LZBBCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios


Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations

Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2014 applicable to Slovak Republic for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

REC-2014-2

Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01, AOP04.1, SAF10, INF04, NAV03, AOP03, ENV01, ITY-AGDL, ITY-ADQ, COM09, COM10, ITY-FMTP and ITY-COTR, to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

Local Stakeholders

Corrective actions taken:

YES: ITY-AGDL, ITY-ADQ and ITY-COTR

Description:

ITY-AGDL and ITY-COTR: Fulfilment of those objectives has been incorporated into the specification of requirements on the E2000 system upgrade. The project plan for E2000 system upgrade has been postponed due to procurement issues.

ITY-ADQ: The Task Force for the implementation of the EC Regulation No 73/2010 was established at the State level in 2010. Members are specialists from MoT, NSA, ANSP and from all relevant data originator´s organisations. The Task Force works in the frame of approved Terms of Reference and the Project Management Plan. Web based application for all data chain is being implemented.

REC-2014-06

(equal to REC-2013-15)

The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers.

FAB ANSPs

Corrective actions taken:

YES

Description:

ANSPs within FAB CE had been coordinating their system renewal and capability evolution mainly through the following activities: CNS Cost Containment Task Force, Project 10 (technical harmonization and optimization) and Project 1 (FRA Study activity 5). The following systems’ deployment and upgrades have been and are being coordinated among FAB CE ANSPs: regional data network X-BONE (communication infrastructure), surveillance infrastructure (including SUR data exchange) and (currently as a study) ATM system upgrade supporting FRA.


Chapter 4 - National Projects

The main projects currently ongoing in Slovak Republic are depicted in the table below:

Name/Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan/ Other references

Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas

Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK)

Air-ground radiocommunication system

Implementation of requirements laid down in the Commission Implementing Regulation No 1079/2012. Upgraded radio stations will also be capable VoIP interfaces

From: 2014 To: 2017

In progress ESSIP: ITY-AGVCS2

OI-Steps: -

Other: -

Capacity: Safety and capacity enhancement

Safety: See "Capacity".

Environment: -

Cost-Efficiency: -

Mode S station Mosník (radar East Slovakia)

Establishment of new SSR/Mode S radar to improve coverage in the Eastern part of airspace of the Slovak Republic.

From: 2008 To: 2015

Completed ESSIP: ITY-SPI

OI-Steps: -

Other: -

Capacity: -

Safety: -

Environment: -

Cost-Efficiency: -

Upgrade of the E2000 system

Upgrade of E2000 system to enable to comply with the SES operational requirements in the region as part of FAB establishment.

From: 2015 To: 2019

In progress ESSIP: -

OI-Steps: -

Other: ESSIP Objectives

Capacity: -

Safety: -

Environment: -

Cost-Efficiency: Replacement of the ATM system reaching the end of its operational life and to align the systems performance with implementation of the SESAR in order to effectively improve quality of the services.

Ministry of Defence (SK)

Radar Sliač Replacing of existing obsolete terminal radar by the new one to enhance safety, in addition, to be Mode S capable.

From: 2017 To: 2018

Planned ESSIP: ITY-SPI

OI-Steps: -

Other: -

Capacity: The new SRE with extended SSR Mode S functionality is capable to increase safety and capacity.


Environment: -

Cost-Efficiency: Replacement of the ATM system reaching the end of its operational life and to align the systems performance with implementation of the SESAR in order to effectively improve quality of the services.




Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development (SK)

Aeronautical Data Quality

Implementation of the quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information for the single European Sky according to Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010.

From: 2010 To: 2017

In progress. ESSIP: INF04, INF07, ITY-ADQ

OI-Steps: IS-0201, IS-0202, IS-0204

Other: -

Capacity: By implementing of the Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010 it is expected that the quality of all aeronautical data will be improved with positive contribution to all KPAs - capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment.


Environment: See "Capacity".

Cost-Efficiency: See "Capacity".

eTOD Partially completed: Area 1 and 4 data is available; Area 2 terrain available; Area 2 obstacles in progress. Area 3 not planned.

From: 2008 To: 2016

Partially completed: Area 1 and 4 data is available; Area 2 terrain available; Area 2 obstacles in progress. Area 3 not planned.

ESSIP: INF07, ITY-ADQ

OI-Steps: IS-0202, IS-0204

Other: -

Capacity: It is expected that implementation of electronic terrain and obstacle data will have the positive impact to all KPAs - capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment.





Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination

5.1 FAB Co-ordination

Having signed and ratified the Agreement on the Establishment of Functional Airspace Block Central Europe, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia are part of FAB CE.

The FAB CE States agreed on establishment of the following permanent bodies - the FAB CE Council, NSA Co-ordination Committee and Joint Civil-Military Airspace Co-ordination Committee. The FAB CE Council can also establish other bodies necessary for the implementation, operation and further development of the FAB CE Project. For this reason the FAB CE Legal Committee and the FAB CE Performance Body (responsible for preparation of FAB CE Performance Plan for RP2) have been established.

The air navigation service providers of the FAB CE countries established and signed the foundation deed of a joint venture on 17 October 2014, at Brnik, Slovenia - FABCE Aviation Services, Ltd. The company is responsible for the professional management of various regional air navigation projects. The establishment of this joint venture is not only effectively aiming at the progress of the FAB CE programme, but at the same time the Single European Sky programme of the European Union.

The FAB CE Strategy was finalized and approved in June 2014, driven by a need to move towards seamless operations in a way that ensures safe and efficient operations. The document describes the environment in which FAB CE is being developed and defines strategic objectives and targets in order to meet the SES performance requirements. The four priority areas are: Performance, Safety, Free Route Airspace and EU targets.

A FAB CE Performance Plan 2015 - 2019 (for AT, CZ, HR, HU, SI and SK) was adopted and signed by FCC representatives. In June 2015 it was sent to the European Commission for final approval.

An Inter-FAB Cooperation Agreement at ANSP level between DANUBE FAB and FAB Central Europe was signed on 14 October 2015. Through the signature of this Agreement, DANUBE FAB and FAB CE have created a framework for cooperation for nine ANSPs. Establishing a flexible cooperation mechanism, the agreement will contribute towards the safe, efficient and optimised provision of air navigation services. The Agreement supports the Single European Sky legislation, with the aim of providing a safer, more cost-efficient, environment-friendly and performance-driven service. The areas of cooperation under the Agreement include the areas of operations, technical, training, performance and safety.

FAB CE actively participated also at the Inter-FAB Co-ordination Platform Workshop in October 2015.

Two Social Dialogue forums were held, in May and November 2015, with a wide variety of participants - ANSP CEOs, FAB CE program management, social partners and trade unions. Two major milestones were achieved at the Social Dialogue Forums: the Social Dialogue Charter was amended, paving the way for the FAB CE Alpe Adria Alliance to officially join the Social Dialogue; the second one is the signing of the ATCO Mobility Paper by the CEO Committee and the ATCO unions.


5.2 FAB related Projects



ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI) FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning (FAB CE P1)

The objective of P1 is the optimal use of the airspace within FAB CE, taking into account air traffic flows while ensuring consistency with the wider European network together with the assessment and implementation of the Free Route Airspace concept. The project will implement the FAB CE FRA study („Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea” project) which will include a simulation exercise to validate the concept and define requirements for the individual ATM systems. The study will also assess the feasibility of implementation FABCE FRA operations with the potential extension to neighbouring FABs (particularly to FABEC and Danube FAB).

Initiation: 3.1.2011

Ongoing activity ESSIP: AOM21.2 OI-Steps: AOM-0401 Other: DP Family 3.2.4

Capacity: Improve performance (capacity, - flight efficiency), implementation of FUA, implementation of the agreed Airspace Plan. Contribute to achieve following performance indicators: • Capacity: to increase capacity to cope with the increase of around 60% in traffic in 2017 with a maximum delay of 0.3 minutes. Safety: - Environment: 11% saving in horizontal flight efficiency by saving 2.1 km deviations (millions) from GCD and saving 23,000 tonnes of Annual CO2 in 2017. Cost-Efficiency: Improvement over 2006 in ATM/CNS costs per flight hour and achieve €469 of economic costs per flight hour in 2017.

Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes (FAB CE P3)

The objective of the project is to optimise the flow of air traffic and the management of airspace within FAB CE, taking into account the FAB CE airspace plan and ensuring consistency with the wider European network operations together with the assessment and implementation of the Rolling ASM/ATFCM Processes and STAM IDP/DM Activity Areas. The project achieved most of its original objectives and is currently being redefined to meet the STAM and FUA/ASM requirements stemming from SESAR DP. A new follow-on project will be initiated in 2016.


Ongoing activity ESSIP: AOM19, FCM05 OI-Steps: AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, DCB-0203,

DCB-0102

Other: DP Family 3.1.1

Capacity: Improve performance through implementation of regular processes for the functional integration of pre-tactical ASM/ATFCM processes and STAM; enhance civil-military cooperation and contributing to full application of FUA in FAB CE airspace.

Safety: -






Deployment of FAB CE Competence Scheme (FAB CE P13)

The objective of the project is to implement the agreed measures described in the FAB CE Competence/Transition Plan to fill in the remaining detected gaps towards full harmonisation of ATCOs competence. It will progressively extend to AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP, where the level of harmonisation is currently lower. The co-ordination with NSAs will be the essential part of the project activities. The project was frozen in 2015.


Frozen in 2015 ESSIP: - OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Cost-efficiency of training.

Training Facilities (FAB CE P14)

The objective of the project is to define and fully harmonise the training of ATCOs, AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP based on the Common Competence Schemes defined by FAB CE P13, focus on achieving an optimal use of ATM staff and higher cost efficiency in training. All above in order to facilitate the development of the same performance standards, interoperability, common licensing and increase in performance and quality by applying best practices and exchanging resources. The project has been frozen in 2015.



Capacity: - Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Contributes to develop the network human capital and improve its flexibility.

ANSP Charging (FAB CE P15)

The objective of the project is to identify how the Single Unit Rate or other modification to the charging mechanism can support Free Route Airspace implementation from the point of view of the revenue distribution and capacity utilization of FABCE ANSPs. The project was frozen in 2015.



Capacity: - Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Improve cost-effciency, mitigation of financial risks.


The following projects from the 2014 LSSIP list of FAB projects were closed in 2015:

FAB CE P2 - Flexible, Efficient and Safe Operations - Completed in 2015, remaining activities transferred to P1,

FAB CE P5 - Regional Communications Infrastructure Development - Closed in 2015; a follow-on project dealing with the X-bone hardware upgrade will be imitated in 2016,

FAB CE P6 - Frequency management - Closed in 2015; remaining activities transferred to other projects and activities,

FAB CE P8 - Contingency - Closed in 2015,

FAB CE P10 - Technical Services harmonisation and optimisation - Closed in 2015; remaining activities transferred to other projects and activities which will be initiated in 2016,

FAB CE P16 - Air Ground Data Link -Closed in 2015.

The following projects were deleted from the 2014 LSSIP list of FAB projects (closed before 2015):

FAB CE P4 - FMTP implementation,

FAB CE P7 - Safety,

FAB CE P9 - ANSP Performance Review Process,

FAB CE P11 - Co-ordination of FAB CE common approach to Aircraft Identification.


5.3 Regional Projects

In the table below are the Regional Cooperation Initiatives and projects, beyond those belonging to the FAB CE.



ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK)

ANSPs cross-border network

The CEOs of all 7 FAB CE air navigation service providers signed the Interconnection Framework Agreement on a regional network for the transmission of information. This agreement crowns several years of active cooperation among network professionals on the development of their ANSPs cross-border network, in short X-bone. It is a fully redundant IPv6 backbone, interconnecting individual networks of national ANSPs. It serves for operational as well as for test and development purposes between the ANSPs in Austria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia. Extension to FAB CE as well as other countries is foreseen in the near future.

- - ESSIP: -

OI-Steps: -

Other: -

Capacity: -

Safety: -

Environment: -

Cost-Efficiency: -

Austrocontrol (AT), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK)

HETA Harmonisation

A common working group of experts from LPS SR, Austrocontrol and Hungarocontrol has been established to harmonize transition altitude at 10 000 ft (TA10K project) within FIR Bratislava, Wien and Budapest.

Planned until: March 31, 2016

- ESSIP: -

OI-Steps: -

Other: -

Capacity: -

Safety: -

Environment: -

Cost-Efficiency: -


Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation

6.1 Conventions

Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’:

o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and

o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**)

State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date

REG (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date ASP (By:mm-yyyy) ASP high level progress statement

ASP. Progress (**)

ASP Impl. Date MIL (By:mm-yyyy) MIL high level progress statement

MIL. Progress (**)

MIL Impl. Date APO (By:mm-yyyy) APO high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

ECAC Completed No Plan

EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable

Multi-N Planned Missing Data

APT Late


6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

Timescales:

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

Partly Completed

‐

The national rules for airspace management and harmonisation of GAT and OAT was done in December 2011. Common principles, rules and procedures for EUROAT will be applied.

31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

Transport Authority


‐ Completed

30/11/2011

Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development


‐

Completed

30/11/2011

Military Aviation Authority

The national rules for airspace management and harmonisation of GAT and OAT were done in December 2011. Common principles, rules and procedures for EUROAT will be applied.

‐ Planned

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

Slovak Air Force


‐ Planned

31/12/2018

Letové prevádzkové slu by Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik


‐

Planned

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2018)


Common principles, rules and procedures for EUROAT will be applied. ‐ Planned

31/12/2018


AOM19

Implement Advanced Airspace Management

Timescales:


Partly Completed

‐

Initial basic steps implemented; next activities will be finished by the end of 2016. Waiting for NMF and implementation of FAB CE. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects – see details in Chapter 5.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

Slovak Air Force

Initial basic steps had been implemented in 2009 and next activities will be finished by the end of 2016.

Functional

integration of

ASM/ATFCM

processes

Partly Completed

31/12/2016


Initial basic steps implemented; next activities will be finished by the end of 2016.

Functional

integration of

ASM/ATFCM

processes

Partly Completed

31/12/2016

AOM21.1

Implementation of Direct Routing

Timescales:

Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017

[PCP]

[Essential] Planned

‐

Implementation of Direct Routing procedures/processes including the ANSP system upgrade and implementation of the transversal activities have been in progress in compliance with the schedule. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects – see details in Chapter 5.

28/04/2016

ASP (By:12/2017)


Implementation of Direct Routing procedures/processes has been in progress in compliance with the schedule.

‐

Planned

28/04/2016

AOM21.2

Implement Free Route Airspace

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential] Planned

‐

Free Route Airspace implementation strategy is planned for the purpose of better airspace utilisation and enhance productivity and reduce controller workload. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects – see details in Chapter 5.

31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2021)


Free Route Airspace implementation will follow successful introduction of Direct Routing

FAB CE

Strategic

Operational

Planning

Planned

31/12/2019


AOP03

Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions

Timescales:


Completed

‐

Objective completed for all airports (Bratislava, Kosice, Piestany, Poprad, Sliac and Zilina). All actions of AOP03 are completed except 1.3.4 from the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions Edition 2.0 which has "no plan". (1.3.4 "Improve situational awareness, when practicable, by conducting all communications associated with runway operations using aviation English).

31/12/2013

REG (By:12/2013)

Reg. Authority

Completed, Recommendations contained in the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions have been implemented.

‐ Completed

31/12/2010


Recommendations contained in the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions have been implemented.

‐ Completed

31/12/2013

ASP (By:12/2013)

Slovak Air Force

Runway Safety Team is established at Sliac airport. Safety Management System has been implemented.

‐ Completed

31/12/2013


Completed for all airports (Bratislava, Kosice, Piestany, Poprad and Zilina). For the military, Runway Safety Team is established at Sliac airport. Safety Management System has been implemented.

‐

Completed

31/12/2012

APO (By:12/2013)

Slovak Air Force

All recommendations have been implemented at Sliac Airport. ‐ Completed

31/12/2013

Letisko M. R. Štefánika ‐ Airport Bratislava, a. s. (BTS)

All SLoAS completed for Bratislava airport except: [AOP03‐APO03] ‐ Implement Communication recommendations ý. All actions of AOP03‐APO03 are completed except 1.3.4 from the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions Edition 2.0 which has "no plan". (1.3.4 "Improve situational awareness, when practicable, by conducting all communications associated with runway operations using aviation English). All airports with commercial transportation have established safety teams dealing also with Prevention of Runway Incursions.

‐

Completed

31/12/2013

Regional Airports

All SLoAS completed for all airports (Bratislava, Kosice, Piestany, Poprad and Zilina) except: [AOP03‐APO03] ‐ Implement Communication recommendations ý. All actions of AOP03‐APO03 are completed except 1.3.4 from the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions Edition 2.0 which has "no plan". (1.3.4 "Improve situational awareness, when practicable, by conducting all communications associated with runway operations using aviation English). All airports with commercial transportation have established safety teams dealing also with Prevention of Runway Incursions.

‐

Completed

31/12/2013


AOP04.1

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1

Timescales:

‐ not applicable ‐

Not Applicable

LZIB ‐ Bratislava Airport

(Outside Applicability Area)

Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective. ‐

REG (By:12/2010)

ASP (By:12/2011)


Not Applicable. Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective.

‐

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2010)



‐

Not Applicable

‐

AOP04.2

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2

Timescales:


Not Applicable




ASP (By:12/2017)



‐

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2017)



‐

Not Applicable

‐


AOP05

Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

Timescales:


Not Applicable




ASP (By:12/2016)



‐

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2016)



‐

Not Applicable

‐

AOP10

Time Based Separation

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential] Not Applicable




REG (By:12/2023)

Reg. Authority


‐ Not Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)



‐

Not Applicable

‐


AOP11

Initial Airport Operations Plan

Timescales:

Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021

[PCP]

[Essential] No Plan


Just at the begining of the objective. Familiarization and initial cooperation between stakeholders has been started aimed to plan and fulfill respective lines of action.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Just at the begining of the objective. Familiarization process has been started aimed to identify required information and set up a process ensuring finalisation criteria AOP11‐ASP01 1).

‐

No Plan

31/12/2021

APO (By:12/2021)


Just at the begining of the objective. Scoping and familiarization process has been started aiming to identify the necessary information to set up a process of evaluation.

‐

No Plan

‐

AOP12

Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential] Not Applicable




ASP (By:12/2020)



Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2020)



Not Applicable

‐


ATC02.5

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Planned

‐

APW level 1 was implemented. There is an intention to implement APW level 2 and to use EUROCONTROL guidance material when specifying the upgraded ATM system.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

Slovak Air Force

The MACC is located at the ASP premises and therefore the same system (ASP) is used for OAT ATC.So OAT traffic will be covered by ASP system in this case. MTMA a MCTR are out of criteria.

‐ Planned

31/12/2016


APW level 1 was implemented. There is an intention to implement APW Level2 and to use EUROCONTROL guidance material when specifying the upgraded ATM system.

‐

Planned

31/12/2016

ATC02.6

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Planned

‐

MSAW level 1 is implemented. There is an intention to implement MSAW Level2 and to use EUROCONTROL guidance material when specifying the upgraded ATM system.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)


MSAW level 1 was implemented. There is an intention to implement MSAW Level2 and to use EUROCONTROL guidance material when specifying the upgraded ATM system.

‐

Planned

31/12/2016

Slovak Air Force

MACC is located at the ASP premises and therefore the same system (ASP) is used for OAT ATC. So OAT traffic will be covered by ASP system in this case.

‐ Planned

31/12/2016


ATC02.7

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2


Timescales:


Not Applicable

‐

APM Level 1 is not implemented. The implementation of APM Level 2 is under consideration. ‐

ASP (By:12/2016)

Slovak Air Force

APM Level 1 is not implemented. The implementation of APM Level 2 is under consideration, whereas MIL uses PAR, which can adopt part of capabilities of APM.

‐ Not Applicable

‐


APM Level 1 is not implemented. The implementation of APM Level 2 is under consideration.

‐

Not Applicable

‐

ATC07.1

Implement AMAN tools and procedures

Timescales:


Not Applicable



Traffic does not justify automation. ‐

ASP (By:12/2015)


Traffic does not justify automation. ‐

Not Applicable

‐

ATC12.1

Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring

Timescales:


Planned

‐

Some functions have been implemented and others will be implemented as part of upgrade of the ATM system.

05/02/2019

ASP (By:12/2021)


Some functions have been implemented and others will be as part of upgrade of the ATM system

‐

Planned

05/02/2019


ATC15

Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations


Timescales:


Not Applicable

‐

The ATM system supports the information exchange for this objective, however due to the level of traffic no AMAN is implemented in Slovak TMAs and therefore the objective is considered Not applicable. Awaiting coordination with neighbours for possible future implementation.

‐

ASP (By:12/2017)


The ATM system supports the information exchange for this objective, however due to the level of traffic no AMAN is implemented in Slovak TMAs and therefore the objective is considered Not applicable. Awaiting coordination with neighbours for possible future implementation of E‐AMAN in line with PCP.

‐

Not Applicable

‐

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1

Timescales:


Completed

‐

MoT SK is confident with implementation ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1. The current MIL aircraft are out of criteria. There is plan to buy new ones. MIL is considered as "Low key Stakeholder" because in this case there is no impact on overall performance of Slovak ATM system.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

Transport Authority

Transport Authority met the requirements of Reg. 1332/2011 ‐ Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:03/2012)


Completed. ‐

Completed

30/06/2011

MIL (By:12/2015)


Planned for new aircraft. Current aircraft are out of criteria. There is plan to buy new ones at about end of 2020.

‐ No Plan

‐


ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer


Timescales:


Not Applicable

‐

Slovakia is out of applicability area. The use of this objective is being discussed at FAB CE level. Currently only preliminary plans exist.

‐

ASP (By:12/2018)

Slovak Air Force

Slovakia is out of applicability area. Moreover, MIL is considered as low level stakeholder.

‐ Not Applicable

‐


The use of this objective is being discussed at FAB CE level. Currently only preliminary plans exist.

‐

Not Applicable

‐

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS

Timescales:


Completed

‐

LPS had implemented Basic ATSMHS capability and gateway facilities to AFTN in 2008. Migration of the international CIDIN circuits to AMHS started with COM centres in Vienna and Budapest. AMHS connections to other centres like Madrid, Warsaw, Zagreb have been implemented and other will follow.

31/12/2014

ASP (By:12/2014)

Slovak Air Force

MIL is in position of AFTN client from LPS. Development of own ATS Messaging Management will include support of AMHS capability.

‐ Completed

31/12/2014


LPS had implemented required infrastructure in 2008 already and is prepared for AMHS transfer. Tests with COM centres in Vienna, Budapest and Prague have been performed. Military will be connected to the AFTN/AMHS through the ASP.

‐

Completed

31/12/2014

COM11

Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM

Timescales:


Planned

‐

The future change is under evaluation and preparation. 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)


VoIP pilot project is under progress to be concluded in 2016/2017. ‐

Planned

31/12/2020

Slovak Air Force

MIL Voice Communication Systems to support VoIP and Provider of military communication network are not ED137 compatible. Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in MIL ATM is under review.

‐

Planned

31/12/2020


ENV01

Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements

Timescales:


Not Applicable



Density of traffic allows to apply CDO techniques most of the time (no restrictions by ATC). General information regarding the application of CDO has been published in national AIP (LZIB AD 2.21.3.3). ATCOs have been trained accordingly (phraseology, provide distance‐to‐go information).

‐

ASP (By:12/2013)


Density of traffic allows to apply CDO techniques most of the time (no restrictions by ATC). General information regarding the application of CDO has been published in national AIP (LZIB AD 2.21.3.3). ATCOs have been trained accordingly (phraseology, provide distance‐to‐go information).

‐

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2013)


See ASP comment. ‐

Not Applicable

‐

ENV02

Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports

Timescales:


Not Applicable




ASP (By:12/2016)



Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2016)



Not Applicable

‐


FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services

Timescales:


Completed

‐

Completed in 2004. (Note: some SLoAs are not applicable since the traffic does not justify automation.) 31/12/2004

ASP (By:07/2014)


Completed in 2004. (Note: some SLoAs are not applicable since the traffic does not justify automation.)

‐

Completed

31/12/2004

FCM03

Implement collaborative flight planning

Timescales:


Planned

‐

Update of local ATM system has been initiated. Planned to be done on time. 31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2017)


Update of local ATM system has been initiated. ‐

Planned

31/12/2016

FCM04

Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1


Timescales:


Not Applicable

‐

Although FAB CE and the Slovak Republic were not in the initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September 2015. Live Trial was used to verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. Based on preliminary results (the final Report on the Operational Trial will be published Q1/2016), FABCE states agree to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE.

‐

ASP (By:12/2015)


The initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September 2015. Live Trial was used to verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. Based on preliminary results (the final Report on the Operational Trial will be published Q1/2016), FABCE ANS providers agree to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE.

‐

Not Applicable

‐


FCM05

Implementation of interactive rolling NOP

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential] Planned

‐

The rolling NOP will allow the users better knowledge of the airspace availability and of the traffic demand to create their specific operations plan. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects – see details in Chapter 5.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2017)


Interactive rolling NOP implementation has been in progress in compliance with Objective AOM19 ‐ Implement Advanced Airspace Management.

Functional

integration of

ASM/ATFCM

processes

Planned

31/12/2016

APO (By:12/2021)


Airport Bratislava is not IATA Level 3 Slot Coordinated airport yet. With the change of the coordination level this SLoA will be revaluated.

‐

Not Applicable

‐

FCM06

Traffic Complexity Assessment

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential] Planned

‐

Traffic Complexity Assessment is foreseen as a tool for better utilization of traffic capacity of the Slovak airspace. Implementation of this tool is in line with the capacity plan of the ASP.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Traffic Complexity Assessment is foreseen as a tool for better utilization of traffic capacity of the Slovak airspace. Implementation of this tool is in line with the capacity plan of the LPS SR.

‐

Planned

31/12/2021


INF04

Implement integrated briefing

Timescales:


Completed

‐

Integrated briefing project has been implemented. The application IBAF is running under LPS responsibility together with the coordination of the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMU).

31/12/2010

ASP (By:12/2012)

Slovak Air Force

Integrated briefing project has been implemented. The application IBAF is running under LPS SR responsibility together with the coordination of the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMU). Integrated briefing function at Sliac Airport is provided based on the agreement between MoD and LPS.

‐

Completed

31/12/2010


Integrated briefing project has been implemented. The application IBAF is running under LPS responsibility together with the coordination of the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMU) and according to agreement between MoD and LPS. All criteria detailled in SloA descriptions have been implemented as follows: Integrated briefing function has been implemented with the following conditions accomplished: ‐ Facilities and services with one final application at one terminal; ‐ One single entry of flight details; ‐ All briefing products combined into a single package that may be tailored by request of the user.

‐

Completed

31/12/2010

INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD)

Timescales:


Partly Completed

‐

National TOD policy is established in Annex 1 of national regulation L 15 (national implementation of ICAO Annex 15). Working group has been established to facilitate implementation of TOD/ADQ policy. The AREA 1 data is available for both terrain and obstacles. AREA 2 and AREA 4 terrain data is available. Verification of the regulatory compliance of TOD implementation is planned.

31/05/2018

REG (By:05/2018)

Reg. Authority

TOD policy established. Other details concernig the progress in area INF07 are mentioned below.

Aeronautical

Data Quality /

eTOD

Partly Completed

30/11/2017

ASP (By:05/2018)


The AREA 1 and AREA 2 terrain data is available. Information for stakeholders how to access data is beeing published in AIP.

‐

Completed

12/11/2015

APO (By:05/2018)


APO is part of the established Working group, which aims to facilitate implementation of TOD/ADQ. Based on the outcomes of the group a roadmap will be developped in conformity with the National TOD implementation plan.

‐

Planned

31/05/2018


ITY‐ACID

Aircraft identification

Timescales:

Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025

Completed

‐

All systems were upgraded to be capable to process ACID data. MIL plan to upgrade their system at Sliac Airport with very low traffic by 01/2020. In this case MIL is considered as "Low key Stakeholder" because there is no impact on overall performance of Slovak ATM system.

30/10/2015

ASP (By:01/2020)


Uprades of the main and back‐up ATM systems were concluded by 1Q/2015.

‐

Completed

30/04/2015

Slovak Air Force

MIL sensors operate with mode 3/A/C (upgrade to Mod‐S planned with acquisition new sensors). ATM surveillance system is ready to share ACID data from civilian sensors.

‐ Planned

02/01/2020

ITY‐ADQ

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

Timescales:

Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

Planned

‐

The Task Force for the implementation of the EC Regulation No. 73/2010 was established at the State level in 2010. Members are specialists from MoT, NSA, ANSP and from all relevant data originator´s organisations. The Task Force works in the frame of approved Terms of Reference and the Project Management Plan. Web based application for all data chain is being implemented.

30/06/2017

REG (By:06/2017)

Transport Authority

Data collection procedures, IT security specialists and relevant data originators are actively involved in the Task Force (see State Comment) activities.

Aeronautical

Data Quality /

eTOD

Planned

30/06/2017

ASP (By:06/2017)


AIM, procedure designers, IT security specialists and relevant data originators are actively involved in the Task Force (see State Comment) activities. Web based application for all data chain has been installed. The new procedures are beeing developed and the configuration of the application is under development in close cooperation with all relevant data originators.

‐

Partly Completed

30/06/2017

APO (By:06/2017)


Data collection procedures, IT security specialists and relevant data originators are actively involved in the Task Force (see State Comment) activities

‐

Planned

30/06/2017


ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285

Timescales:

ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

Late

‐

There is a FAB CE common project for Seamless Operations part of which is the implementation of A/G Datalink.

05/02/2019

REG (By:02/2018)

Transport Authority

Actions will be completed in line with ASP implementation plans. ‐ Late

05/02/2019

ASP (By:02/2018)


There is a FAB CE common project for Seamless Operations part of which is the implementation of A/G Datalink. Project at LPS has been started with scheduled operational transition at 2016.

Air Ground

Data Link

Late

05/02/2019

MIL (By:01/2019)

Slovak Air Force

CPDL will not be implemented on the military transport‐type aircraft. ‐ Not Applicable

‐

Ministry of Defence

MIL has not planned yet to implement SES Data Link Services above FL 285 neither Equip transport‐type State aircraft.

‐ Not Applicable

‐

ITY‐AGVCS2

Implement 8,33 kHz air‐ground voice channel spacing below FL195

Timescales:

Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

Planned

‐

Activities related to extension of 8.33 channel spacing below FL195 are in progress. 31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

Transport Authority

Activities related to extension of 8.33 channel spacing below FL195 are in progress

‐ Planned

31/12/2018


Aircraft and CNS equipment has been partially upgraded concerning 8,33 kHz channel spacing capability. All procedures are planned to be accomplished according to requirements.

‐ Planned

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

Slovak Air Force


‐ Planned

31/12/2018


Activities related to extension of 8.33 channel spacing below FL195 are in progress. Upgrade plan for renewal of ground radio station includes radio sites operated for ACC Bratislava and APP/TWR ‐ Stefanik by 2017. All remaining radio sites for ACC Bratislava and other Slovak airports (LZKZ, LZTT, LZZI and LZPP) will re‐use existing 8.33 radios.

Air‐ground

radiocommun

ication

system

Planned

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2020)

Slovak Air Aircraft and CNS equipment has been partially upgraded concerning 8,33 ‐ Planned


Force kHz channel spacing capability. All procedures are planned to be accomplished according to requirements. 31/12/2018

Ministry of Defence


‐ Planned

31/12/2018



‐ Planned

31/12/2018

APO (By:12/2018)


The implementation projects are planned to be accomplished according to the requirements (at Bratislava airport).

‐

Planned

31/12/2018

ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes

Timescales:

Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL285 in the airspace defined in Regulation (EU) 2015/310: 05/02/2018

Late

‐

The services related to COTR are implemented. The remaining services (LOF and NAN) linked to implementation of AGDL are planned to be implemented by 02/2019.

05/02/2019

ASP (By:02/2018)


Planned implementation by 2019. ‐

Late

05/02/2019

MIL (By:12/2012)

Slovak Air Force

CIV MIL coordination is performed by means of common system. There is no intention yet to implement OLDI between civil and military coordination. Flight data exchange systems supporting the coordination procedures between air traffic services units and controlling military units, which operates their own system.

‐

Completed

31/12/2012


CIV MIL coordination is performed by means of common system. There is no intention yet to implement OLDI between civil and military coordination. Flight data exchange systems supporting the coordination procedures between air traffic services units and controlling military units, which operates their own system.

‐

Completed

31/12/2012


ITY‐FMTP

Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP)

Timescales:

Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

Completed

‐

LPS is IPv6 compliant. Connected already to Prague, Budapest and Vienna. Awaiting rest of neighbours to migrate for full implementation.

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2014)


ATM systems has been interconnected between Prague, Budapest and Vienna. Awaiting rest of neighbours to migrate for full implementation.

‐

Completed

30/04/2011

MIL (By:12/2014)

Slovak Air Force

Common ATM system is used for the Civil ‐ Military coordination. ‐ Completed

31/12/2012

ITY‐SPI

Surveillance performance and interoperability

Timescales:

Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

Planned

‐

Plan related to safety assessment of the existing surveillance infrastructure has been proposed. NSA is capable to conduct safety oversight.

31/12/2019

REG (By:02/2015)

Transport Authority

NSA is capable to conduct safety oversight. ‐ Completed

31/12/2012

ASP (By:02/2015)


The safety assessment documentation was prepared during SDP system upgrade and it was delivered to NSA .

Mode S

station

Mosník (radar

East Slovakia)

/ Radar Sliac

Completed

31/03/2013

MIL (By:06/2020)


The transport aircraft are equipped with Mode S Elementary Surveillance. Equipment of the fighter aircraft is under review. Mode S Enhanced Surveillance and ADS‐B Out avionics are planned only for new aircraft.

‐ Planned

31/12/2019


NAV03

Implementation of P‐RNAV


Timescales:


Not Applicable

‐

Current traffic density doesn't require the implementation in terms of cost benefit ratio. ‐

ASP (By:12/2023)


Current traffic density doesn't require the implementation in terms of cost benefit ratio.

‐

Not Applicable

‐

NAV10

Implement APV procedures

Timescales:


Partly Completed

‐

Implementation of APV procedures at Bratislava and Kosice airports completed. Implementation of APV procedures for other regional airports (LZPP, LZZI, LZTT) planned by the end of 2016.

31/12/2016

REG (By:04/2016)

Reg. Authority

EASA late for detailed implementation regulation according to EU reg. 965/2015. Implementation of AMC 20‐27, AMC 20‐28 has been started at 2013.

‐ Planned

30/04/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)


Implementation of APV procedures at Bratislava and Kosice airports completed. Implementation of APV procedures for other regional airports (LZPP, LZZI, LZTT) planned by the end of 2016.

‐

Partly Completed

31/12/2016


SAF10

Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements

Timescales:


Completed

‐

The measures were implemented according to European Action Plan for Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction.

31/12/2011

REG (By:12/2011)

Reg. Authority


‐ Completed

31/12/2011

ASP (By:12/2011)



‐

Completed

31/12/2011

MIL (By:12/2011)



‐ Completed

31/12/2011

SAF11

Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions

Timescales:


Planned

‐

Measures will be implemented according to European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions.

31/01/2018

REG (By:01/2018)

Transport Authority

Measures will be implemented according to European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions.

‐ Completed

31/12/2015


Appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions were implemented excluding ATIS.

‐ Planned

31/01/2018

ASP (By:12/2014)

Slovak Air Force

The applicable measures of the Action Plan have been implemented. ‐ Completed

31/12/2015


The applicable measures of the Action Plan have been implemented. ‐

Completed

31/12/2015

APO (By:12/2014)


All activities from European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions, parts 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 are in place. A need for implementation of 3.2.9 was not recognized for the period of next 2 years.

‐

Completed

31/12/2015


6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress


Annexes

Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP Focal Point for Slovak Republic LPS SR Augustín LAMPRECHT

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA MoT

TA Zdenko BLAŠKO

Vojtech ŠPROCH

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP LPS SR Tomas ŠPAVELKO

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Airport Bratislava Gabriel DOMŠITZ

LSSIP Focal Point for Military MoD Maroš KLINČAK

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person for Slovak Republic

DPS/PEPR Agnieszka DYBOWSKA

ESSIP Objective Implementation

ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist(s)

AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI, E. REUBER

A. DYBOWSKA LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR TA: Ján SOKOL MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI


AOM21.1 R. BUCUROIU


AOM21.2 R. BUCUROIU


AOP03

T. LICU

P. VRANJKOVIC LPS SR: Mária KOVÁČOVÁ TA: Matěj MARETH AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ MIL: Ján SALAJ

AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON

P. VRANJKOVIC LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ TA: Matěj MARETH, AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON


AOP05 P. ADAMSON


AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE

B. HILL LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ TA: Vojtech ŠPROCH

AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE

B. HILL LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ TA: Vojtech ŠPROCH AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC N/A

ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Ján SOKOL


ESSIP Objective



MIL: Marián BABEĽA

ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI

I. FEIJT LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Ján SOKOL MIL: Marián BABEĽA

ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI

I. FEIJT LPS SR : Ján BURŠÍK TA : Jaroslav ŠULC MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI

L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR : Ján BURŠÍK TA : Jaroslav ŠULC MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI

L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR : Ján BURŠÍK TA : Jaroslav ŠULC MIL: Marián BABEĽA

ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI

L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR TA: Ján SOKOL MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI

L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR: Mária KOVÁČOVÁ TA: Ľuboš JANUŠKA MIL: Vladimír VOJENČIAK

ATC17 S. MORTON

L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Miron MIŠANIČ MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU

A. KOKONA LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Miron MIŠANIČ MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

COM11 L. POPESCU

A. KOKONA LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Miron MIŠANIČ MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

ENV01

C. FABER

B. HILL LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ TA: Jaroslav ŠULC AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

ENV02

S. MAHONY, A. WATT

B. HILL LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ TA: Matěj MARETH AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

FCM01 H. KOOLEN

O. CIOARA LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR TA: Ján SOKOL MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

FCM03 TBD


FCM04 P. HOP


FCM05 I. MENDES


FCM06 P. HOP

O. ALFARO LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR TA: Ján SOKOL MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

INF04 P. MATERN

A-P. FRANGOLHO LPS SR: Andrej PENER TA: Martina CHIBEĽOVÁ MIL : Eduard PANÁČEK

INF07 A. PETROVSKY

A-P. FRANGOLHO LPS SR : Tomáš FLASSIK TA: Matěj MARETH MIL : N/A

ITY-ACID

A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK

TA: Miron MIŠANIČ

MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO TA: Matěj Mareth LPS SR: Andrej PENER


ESSIP Objective



MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

ITY-AGDL S. DISSING

A. KOKONA LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Jaroslav ŠULC MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

ITY-AGVCS2 J POUZET

O. ALFARO LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Miron MIŠANIČ MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

ITY-COTR S. MORTON

L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Vojtech ŠPROCH MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU

O. ALFARO LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Ľubomír SOBOLIČ MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART

O. CIOARA LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Ľubomír SOBOLIČ MIL: Maroš KLINČÁK

NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC

A. KOKONA LPS SR: Rastislav PRIMUS TA: Jaroslav ŠULC MIL : Eduard PANÁČEK

NAV10 R. FARNWORTH

A. KOKONA LPS SR: Rastislav PRIMUS TA: Jaroslav ŠULC MIL : Eduard PANÁČEK

SAF10 T. LICU

I. FEIJT LPS SR: Mária KOVÁČOVÁ TA: Jozef TÓTH MIL: Ján SALAJ

SAF11 S. LAWRENCE

I. FEIJT LPS SR: Mária KOVÁČOVÁ TA: Jozef TÓTH MIL: Ján SALAJ


Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts


Organisational Scheme of the Military Stakeholders

LPS SR, š. p. Organization Chart

Deputy Chief Executive

Officer

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Aerodrome and Approach Services Division

Director

ATM / CNSInfrastructure Division

Director

General Administration

(Human Resources )

Safety Department

ATS Operational and Technical

Management Centre

Department of Technical Development, Methodology

and Projects

Department for Planning

and Charging Policy

Accounting Department

APP/TWR Štefánik APP/TWR Košice

TWR Pieštany TWR Tatry

TWR ŽilinaMethodology

and Procedures Department

Internal Administration

Department

Information Systems Department

Aeronautical Information

Management Department

Training Centre

II. Leve

l of M

anag

eme

ntI. Le

vel of

Ma

nagem

entIII. Level of

Man

agem

ent

Finance Division

Director

CEO´s Office

Quality Manager

Crisis Management

International Affairs

En-Route Services Division

Director

Rescue Coordination

Centre

ACC BratislavaFlight Information

Centre

Methodology and Procedures

Department

Central Air Traffic Services Reporting

Office (CARO)

Security ManagerProcurement

Investment and Property Department


Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations

AF ATM Functionality

FT Fast Track

PCP Pilot Common Project

PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme

S-AF Sub ATM Functionality