lssip 2018 - finland · the finnish transport and communications agency traficom, caa finland,...

EUROCONTROL25 YEARS

of ATM Implementation Reportingin Europe

Level 1 - Implementation Overview

LSSIP 2018 - FINLANDLocal Single Sky ImPlementation

LSSIP Year 2018 Finland Released Issue

Document Title LSSIP Year 2018 for Finland

Infocentre Reference 19/02/05/15

Date of Edition 10/04/2019

LSSIP Focal Point Jouko RANTA - [email protected] Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom

LSSIP Contact Person Luca DELL’ORTO – [email protected] EUROCONTROL/DECMA/ACS/PRM

Status Released

Intended for Agency Stakeholders

Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Reference Documents

LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip LSSIP Guidance Material

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2018

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3-implementation-plan

Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2018

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3-implementation-report

European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor Acronyms and abbreviations

https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/Glossaries.pdf

AIP FINLAND https://www.ais.fi/en

NEFAB Performance Plan

https://www.nefab.eu/docs

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]








https://www.eatmportal.eu/working/signin

http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor



https://www.ais.fi/en

https://www.nefab.eu/docs


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2018 document and their signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2018.


CONTENTS

1. National ATM Environment ............................................................ 6 Geographical Scope ............................................................................................ 6 National Stakeholders ........................................................................................ 8

2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 15 Evolution of traffic in Finland ........................................................................... 15 Helsinki ACC (former Tampere ACC) ................................................................ 16

3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 19

4. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 20

5. Cooperation activities .................................................................. 21 FAB Co-ordination ............................................................................................ 21 Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 22

6. Implementation Objectives Progress ........................................... 24 State View......................................................................................................... 24 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 30

Annexes Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Finland

National stakeholders’ organisation charts

Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR, ICAO and DP

Glossary of abbreviations

LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

The Finnish Transport and communications Agency Traficom, CAA Finland, including the role as NSA, carry out the civil aviation regulatory tasks. Traficom is an authority serving people and businesses in licence, registration and approval matters related to transport and communications. Traficom is a merger of the Finnish Transport Safety Agency, Trafi; Communications Regulatory Authority, FICORA; and certain functions of the Transport Agency.

Finavia Corporation is responsible for maintaining 21 state owned airports, of which 19 are involved in regular traffic. In addition, there are three non-state-owned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Lappeenranta, Mikkeli and Seinäjoki). Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and the only one being co-ordinated and covered by the LSSIP.

Air Navigation Services Finland Oy (ANS Finland) is taking care of all En-route and airport related ATM services, except EFMI and EFSI.

The Finnish Meteorological Institute is designated as MET service provider to supply MET data on an exclusive basis in Helsinki FIR.

Traficom, ANS Finland and FMI report to the Ministry of Transport and Communications. Finavia reports to the Prime Minister’s office.

The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management.

Finland has an integrated civil-military ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done based on actual needs.

Military/Air Force does not have any service provision role in Finnish aviation.

The Safety Investigation Authority (SIA), reporting to the Ministry of Justice, carries out safety investigations following accidents and/or serious incidents.

Traffic and Capacity

2018 Traffic in Finland increased by 8.3% during summer 2018 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in 2017.

2019-2024

The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.2% and 2.8% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.5%.


Progress per SESAR Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1 (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.

The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ATM MP L3 Edition 2011-2017) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.

Pre-SESAR Implementation

2010 2019 82%

PCP Implementation

2015 2023 33%

Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.

n/a

70%

Pre-

SESA

R

90% 74%

89%

69%

12%

Pre-

SESA

R

Pre-

SESA

R

Pre-

SESA

R

PCP

PCP

PCP

PCP

Optimised ATM

Network Services

Advanced Air Traffic Services

High Performing

Airport Operations

26%

Enabling Aviation Infrastructure


ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks 0 and 1. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 6.1.

Block 0 2010 2018

88%

Block 1 2015 2022

52%

ATM Deployment Outlook

● State objectives

Deployed in 2017-2018: - Surveillance Performance & Interoperability [ITY-SPI] 100% progress

- Data Link [ITY-AGDL] 100% progress - Collaborative Flight Planning [FCM03] 98% progress - FMTP [ITY-FMTP] 92% progress - AMHS [COM10] 67% progress - OAT and GAT handling [AOM13.1] 65% progress - ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 53% progress - Real-Time Airspace Data [AOM19.2] 52% progress - ASM/ATFCM process [AOM19.3] 40% progress

- NewPENS [COM12] 53% progress - Aircraft Identification [ITY-ACID] 50% progress - MTCD & CORA [ATC12.1] 48% progress - Aeronautical Information [ITY-ADQ] 28% progress - eTOD [INF07] 16% progress - Voice over IP [COM11] 10% progress

- Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 33% progress - STAM Phase 2 [FCM04.2] 10% progress - Pre-defined Airspace Configurations [AOM19.4] 10% progress - Traffic Complexity [FCM06] 10% progress - Extended Flight Plan [FCM08] 10% progress

- SWIM Yellow TI Profile [INF08.1] 0% progress - Multi Sector Planning En-route [ATC18] 0% progress

● Airport objectives - EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport

Deployed in 2017-2018: - A-SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) [AOP04.2] 100% progress

- CCOs [ENV03] 70% progress

- CDOs [ENV01] 82% progress

By 12/2019 By 12/2020 By 12/2021 2022+

By 12/2019 By 12/2020 By 12/2021 2022+


● Airport objectives - EFKE - KEMI-TORNIO

Deployed in 2017-2018: /

- Remote Tower [AOP14] 0% progress

By 12/2019 By 12/2020 By 12/2021 2022+


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3)/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2018, together with plans for the next years.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2018, which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions;

Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document;

Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;

Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high-level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2018. In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.

The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


1. National ATM Environment

Geographical Scope

International Membership

Finland is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC 1955

EUROCONTROL 2001

European Union 1995

EASA 2006

ICAO 1949

NATO - -

ITU 1920

Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses the Helsinki FIR (EFIN) former Finland FIR. Flight Information Region (FIR) has been renamed in 2019 to be in compliant with ICAO SARPs.

Helsinki FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States: Norway (Norway FIR/UIR), Sweden (Sweden FIR/UIR), Estonia (Tallinn FIR/UIR) and a non-ECAC State, Russia (St Petersburg FIR and Murmansk FIR).

In order to achieve some of the objectives of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan (a.k.a. the ESSIP Plan), Helsinki ACC (former Tampere ACC) co-ordinates actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs.


Airspace Classification and Organisation

On 27 November 2003, ICAO airspace Class C was implemented above FL 95 and the upper limit of controlled airspace was raised to FL660. AIP Finland is available at: www.ais.fi/en

ATC Units

The ATC units in the Finnish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route TMA

Helsinki ACC (EFIN)

13 EFIN

Helsinki APP 4 EFIN

Note: The number of sectors as indicated in this table is the number of technically existing sectors; some of those sectors are operationally used in combined sector formats.


National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Finland are the following:

- Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom – the civil aviation regulatory body and NSA

- Air Navigation Services Finland Oy (ANS Finland) the main ATS-provider in Finland

- Finavia Corporation - the main airport operator in Finland

- Finnish Meteorological Institute – designated MET provider

- City of Mikkeli, operator in Mikkeli airport (EFMI) and AFIS provider

- Seinäjoki Airport Ltd., operator in Seinäjoki airport (EFSI) and AFIS provider

- Military Aviation Authority (MAA) – the military regulatory body;

- Air Force Command Finland;

- Safety Investigation Authority (SIA).

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.

Council of State

Prime Minister’sOffice

Finavia

Ministry of Justice

Safety Investigation Authority

Ministry of Transport and Communications

Finnish Transport and Communications

Agency

Air NavigationServices Finland

Finnish Meteorological

Institute (METSP)

Seinäjoki Airport

City of Mikkeli (Mikkeli Airport

ANSP)

Ministry of Defence

Defence Command Finland

Air Force Command Finland

Military Aviation Authority


Civil Regulator(s)

General Information

Civil Aviation in Finland is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis

Rule-making Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom

Aviation Act (864/2014) and Act on the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (935/2018)

Safety Oversight Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom (NSA)


Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom

Aviation Act (864/2014), Criminal Code (39/1889)

Airspace Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom

Aviation Act (864/2014)

Economic Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom

Aviation Act (864/2014)

Environment Environmental permit authority Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom

Permit authority according to Environmental Protection Act 527/2014 and Environmental protection decree 713/2014 grants environmental permits for airports. Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom has regulatory power in some environmental issues according to Aviation Act (864/2014).

Security Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom


Accident investigation Ministry of Justice, Safety Investigation Authority

Safety Investigation Act (525/2011)

Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom, the CAA Finland, is further detailed in the following sections.


FINNISH CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY

The Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom carry out the civil aviation regulatory tasks. It is an independent agency operating under the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MoTC) and is organisationally separated from the Air Navigation Service Providers.

Annual Report published: N Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom doesn’t publish an annual report.

The Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom is the National Supervisory Authority (NSA) in Finland.

http://www.traficom.fi/en

The current organisation chart is given in Annexes.

Air Navigation Services Finland

Services provided


Governance: State Limited Company Ownership: 100 % State owned

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET N

ATCO training Y

Others Y ANS technical services

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

N

Annual Report published: N Will be published later 2019

ANS Finland website can be found at:

https://www.ansfinland.fi/en

http://www.traficom.fi/en

https://www.ansfinland.fi/en


ATC systems in use

Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 -

FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS

Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2015, EFHK 2015

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? The present Thales TopSky ATM-system is under continuous development.

ATC Unit EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 21 sites.

SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2017, EFHK 2017

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? The present Thales TopSky ATM-system is under continuous development.

ATC Unit EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 21 sites.

Airports

General information

Finavia Corporation is the main airport operator in Finland, responsible for maintaining 21 airports, of which 19 are involved in regular traffic. Finavia Corporation is 100 % state owned enterprise. Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and the only one being co-ordinated and covered by the LSSIP.

In addition, there are three non-state-owned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Lappeenranta, Mikkeli and Seinäjoki).

Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2018 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives.

According to these criteria, the airport covered in this LSSIP is Helsinki-Vantaa airport. The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for Helsinki-Vantaa airport: https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/EFHK

1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))

https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/EFHK


Military Authorities

The Military Authorities in Finland are composed of:

- Defence Command Finland; - Air Force Command Finland; - Navy Command Finland; - Army Command Finland; - Military Aviation Authority (MAA).

They are supervised by the ministry of Defence.

Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.

The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management.

Finland has an integrated civil-military ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done on basis of actual needs.

Information on the application of FUA is provided at the end of this chapter.

The current organisation chart is given in Annexes.

Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule-making

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N/A

Level of such legal provision: 1) Finnish Aviation Act 2) Aviation Regulation-series (issued by FCAA, incl. Rules of the Air) 3) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by MAA, e.g.regulations on Air Traffic Services for military aviation) 4) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by FINAF; e.g. prerogatives)

Level of such legal provision: N/A

Authority signing such legal provision: 1) Parliament/Head of State (President) 2) Director General of FCAA (DGCA Finland) 3) Director of MAA 4) Commander of Finnish Air Force

Authority signing such legal provision: N/A

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT

OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination

ATCO Training Y ATCO Training

ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing


Oversight

Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N/A If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate:

Certificate issued by: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification

ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: The Finnish Aviation Act is binding for all civil and military aviation in Finland. Based on the Aviation Act the MAA has the right to supplement aviation regulations with official directives to such an extent that is permitted by the applicable regulations.

Additional Information:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP N National AIP

National Military AIP N National Military AIP

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP

Other: Other:

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: NSA NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En-Route N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) En-Route N

Approach/TMA N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) Approach/TMA N

Airfield/TWR/GND N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) Airfield/TWR/GND N

AIS N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) AIS N

MET N Finnish Meteorological Institute MET N

SAR N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) The Military assists civil ARSC on request

SAR N

TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N

Other: Other: N

Additional Information: Additional Information: No GAT services provided by the Military


User role

Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Within specific corridors only

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF

CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: Few Instrument Approach Procedures only for military aviation.

Military in Finland applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




2. Traffic and Capacity

Evolution of traffic in Finland

2018 Traffic in Finland increased by 8.3% during summer 2018 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in 2017.

2019-2024

The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.2% and 2.8% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.5%.

0

50.000

100.000

150.000

200.000

250.000

300.000

350.000

400.000

2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 A 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 F

IFR

flig

hts

Finland - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast

International Dep/Arr 59%

Domestic flights 18%

Overflights 23%

Finland - Distribution (Ref. year 2017)

A = ActualF = Forecast

2015 A 2016 A 2017 A 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 FH 7.8% 3.8% 3.3% 2.5% 2.6% 2.5% 2.2%B 0.0% -0.4% 6.4% 7.7% 2.7% 1.5% 1.1% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2%L 7.5% 1.5% -0.1% -0.1% 0.0% -0.1% 0.1%

ECAC B 1.6% 2.8% 4.0% 3.7% 3.0% 2.6% 2.1% 1.9% 2.0% 2.1%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2018)IFR flights yearly growth

Finland


Helsinki ACC (former Tampere ACC)

Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2014-2024

Performance summer 2018

Traffic Evolution 2018 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer

Capacity gap Ref value Actual

+9.3% 58 (0%) 0.07 0.00 No

The average en-route delay per remained at zero minutes per flight in summer 2018.

Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments

Start CPDLC Project Yes CPDLC implemented 6.12.2018

Maintain number of controllers Yes

MVs of most TFVs to be raised by appr. 10% in January Yes

Maximum configuration: 6 sectors No 4 sectors were sufficient

Summer 2018 performance assessment

The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 49 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 41.


Planning Period 2019-2024 The planning focuses on the summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

Following the inputs provided by the European Commission at the ad-hoc NMB on 25 October 2018, en-route delay reference values and capacity requirement profiles have been calculated for RP3 (2020-2024) based on the proposal made by the PRB to the European Commission.

Final en-route delay reference values and capacity requirement profiles will be provided after the final decision on RP3 targets.

Summer Capacity Plan

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Free Route Airspace

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

LARA tool planned implementation

Apr.2019

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Cooperative Traffic Management

Airspace Airspace re-design AIRAC April 2019, 1

new sector

Procedures

Staffing

Technical

B2B applications development

ongoing

DAPS implementation Q2

WAM implementation Q3

Capacity

Significant Events

Max Conf 5 5 5 5 5 5

Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet demand

Reference profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Sufficient capacity to meet demand

Annual Reference Value (min) 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.06

Summer reference value (min) 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05

Additional information

En-route ATFM delay breakdownRP2 Reference Values

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 20240.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5

NETWORK

Annual

En-route ATFM delay breakdownPRB proposal

RP3 Reference Values


2020-2024: Indicative RP3 Reference Values

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

00:0

0

02:0

0

04:0

0

06:0

0

08:0

0

10:0

0

12:0

0

14:0

0

16:0

0

18:0

0

20:0

0

22:0

0

Sectors available - Summer 2019 - WD

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

00:0

0

02:0

0

04:0

0

06:0

0

08:0

0

10:0

0

12:0

0

14:0

0

16:0

0

18:0

0

20:0

0

22:0

0

Sectors available - Summer 2019 - WE

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 20242019 Reference Capacity Profile

2020-2024 Indicative Reference Capacity Profile 58 58 58 58 58 58

Capacity Profile - Current Routes 58 58 58 58 58 58Capacity Profile - High 58 58 58 58 58 58Capacity Profile - Low 58 58 58 58 58 58Capacity Baseline 58 582019 - 2024 Plan 58 58 58 58 58 58Capacity Profile - Shortest Routes (Open) 58 58 58 58 58 58

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Capa

city

pro

file

(mov

emen

ts p

er h

our)

EFINCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

2019-2024 Planning Period Outlook

No problems are foreseen for the ACC during the planning cycle.


3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions

Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2018 applicable to Finland for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Conclusion Applicable to COLLABORATIVE FLIGHT PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION DELAYS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AND SUPPORT FOR IMPLEMENTATION FROM NM GIVEN TO THE LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS. (page 10 of the Report)

All States with delays in implementation of FCM03

State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES Description of the planned action: Full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year 2019.


4. Implementation Projects

Present ongoing projects are mainly listed in chapter 5 – Co-operation activities and in chapter 6 – Implementation objectives.


5. Cooperation activities

FAB Co-ordination

NEFAB FRA

The overall objective of NEFAB FRA project was implementation of unrestricted and seamless FRA within NEFAB and implementation of FRA compliant procedures in Bodø Oceanic. The final integration of all NEFAB FRA volumes into seamless continuum was completed in May 2017.

This project was executed in close cooperation with DK-SE FAB, involving the stepwise interfacing of FRA volumes in two neighbouring FABs, as described in chapter 5.2.

The NEFAB FRA will be extended with including the Helsinki TMA into FRA volume in April 2019.

The next step in NEFAB FRA development is considering the removal of ATS routes. The process was initiated with stakeholder discussions at the NEFAB Customer Consultation workshop in September 2017. The implementation will be further coordinated with each State and ANSP.

SMS Harmonisation

SMS Harmonisation project was initiated in 2016 with pilot study to specify the concrete proposals, risks and mitigation for areas of possible harmonisation on short and long term.

The overall objective of the SMS Harmonisation is to provide the appropriate support to:

- improve the total efficiency of the Safety Management Systems; - enable SMS functionalities and processes supporting cross border services; - enable for improved cost efficiency; - enable for future integration of SMS functionalities and processes.

The further harmonization process is being aligned with the implementation of the Commission IR (EU) 2017/373.

The NEFAB SMS harmonization is supporting the FAB-wide safety data exchange, aimed at systematic safety data sharing, processing and disseminating between FAB partners.

NEFAB NAV strategy

Based on the NEFAB ANSPs’ 5-year strategy, the NEFAB NAV domain mapping was done in 2018, including: - the brief description of developments and timeline in the national NAV domains; - the status of national Navigation Strategies and PBN Implementation Plans; - the estimate on possible areas of cooperation/coordination on FAB level.

The outcome will be taken into account by NEFAB States when drafting national NAV strategies.


Regional cooperation

Regional cooperation initiatives

NEFRA

NEFAB has been closely cooperating with DK-SE FAB within an agreed concept to implement a continuous and seamless FRA from a user perspective across the two FABs. The project was named North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) Programme.

The NEFRA Programme anticipated the implementation of seamless interface between the two FABs above FL285 (because Danish-Swedish FAB FRA is above FL285). In November 2015 the first milestone of NEFRA Phase 1 was implemented with harmonized FPL rules for FRA operations across the two FABs. First step of cross-border FRA between two FABs was implemented in June 2016 with seamless FRA operations between NEFAB East (Estonia, Finland, Latvia) and DK-SE FAB. Seamless FRA interface with Norway was finalised in May 2017 allowing unrestricted FRA operation across the borders of all six states in both FABs.

FRA was also implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017.Flight planning in Bodø Oceanic is done in accordance with ICAO Doc 7030.

The next NEFRA related activities, if any, have been agreed to be organised under Borealis cooperation.

Borealis FRA

The Borealis Alliance is the industrial partnership between 9 European ANSPs - LFV (Sweden), ANS Finland (Finland), Avinor (Norway), ISAVIA (Iceland), Naviair (Denmark), EANS (Estonia), IAA (Ireland), LGS (Latvia) and NATS (UK). The objective of the Alliance is to enable joint initiatives to improve flight efficiency and reduce environmental impact, delivered across the whole area in a move, which will also streamline cost of services and operational/technical infrastructure.

In 2015 Borealis Alliance initiated the Free Route Airspace (FRA) Programme to create a multi-FAB FRA by establishing interfaces between FRA areas in 3 FABs (NEFAB, DK-SE FAB and UK-IRL FAB) and Iceland. The Borealis FRA concept of operation is based on the NEFRA concept, i.e. to connect the FRA volumes of 9 States seamlessly, so that these appear as one continuous FRA to airspace users.

FINEST

FINEST programme supports the Single European Sky concept being a bi-lateral cooperation programme between Estonian ANS and ANS Finland with the main aim to provide cross-border services in adjacent airspace, ensuring the business contingency, increasing cost efficiency and sustainability of the services provided.

During 2017-2018 prepared concept of operations, cost-benefit analysis and detailed system description have given the EANS and ANS Finland Management Boards enough assurance to go further with the programme plans.

In the beginning of 2019, ANS Finland and EANS have agreed to go on with the necessary investments needed for the FINEST programme.

FINEST is expected to become operational in 2022.


NAMCON (Northern Europe Aviation Meteorology Consortium)

National Meteorological Services (NMS) of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Norway and Sweden, as the designated MET service providers for aeronautical meteorological forecasts, launched the NAMCON co-operation in 2011 and these equal partners have worked actively together to support SES targets. The consortium co-operates with NEFAB and DK-SE FAB. More recently, work is underway with the Nordic NSA MET expert group.

NAMCON’s mission since the beginning has been to improve efficiency, reliability and access to aviation weather products and services for airspace users in Northern Europe.

Co-operation inside NAMCON includes e.g. cross-border joint production, shared production systems, harmonized MET products and OPS manuals and consolidated work on research and development to fulfill future user needs. Joint NAMCON work is also ongoing regarding compliance matters, especially preparing for EU 2017/373 requirements for MET provision.


6. Implementation Objectives Progress

State View

Overall Objective Implementation

Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives

Finland is late in implementing Objectives AOM13.1, AOM19.1, COM10, FCM03, INF07, ITY-ACID, ITY-ADQ and ITY-FMTP. Regarding AOM13.1, implementation is planned in 2019. Regarding AOM19.1, existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by the end of 2019. Regarding COM10, basic AMHS was implemented in 2010 but delays involved in various project phases for extended AMHS have delayed full implementation, still full implementation is expected to take place during the year 2019. Regarding FCM03, ANS Finland is planning for full implementation of collaborative flight planning for the year 2019. Regarding INF07, the planning for provision of electronic terrain and obstacle data is planned for the year

2020. Regarding ITY-ACID, the operational use of ACID is planned to happen countrywide by the end of 2020 when the WAM and Mode-S sensors will cover entire Helsinki FIR. Regarding ITY-ADQ, ANS Finland has started a project to help the national implementation that is expected to take place by the end of 2020. Regarding ITY-FMTP, the common flight message transfer protocol is expected to become operational by the end of June 2019.

Other applicable objects are planned to be implemented according to the FOC dates.


Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature

Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annexes.

Legend:

## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF)

100% = Objective completed = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline

Optimised ATM Network Services

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

65%

AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA 53%

AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data 52%

AOM19.3 (PCP) Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing

40%

AOM19.4 (PCP) Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations

10%

FCM01 Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services 100%

FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 98%

FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 n/a

FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 10%

FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP 33%

FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment 10%



<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing n/a

AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace 100%

ATC02.2 STCA En-Route 100%

ATC02.8 Ground-Based Safety Nets 100%

ATC02.9 Enhanced STCA for TMAs 100%

ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures

EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100%

ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring

48%

ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En-route in Support of AMAN

100%

ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace

n/a

ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1 100%

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

100%

ATC18 Multi Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T Local objective 0%

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations


ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective


ITY-COTR Ground-Ground Automated Co-ordination Processes

100%

NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100%

NAV03.2 (PCP) RNP 1 in TMA Operations n/a

NAV10 APV procedures 100%

NAV12 Optimised Low-Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft

Local objective n/a


High Performing Airport Operations

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOP04.1 A-SMGCS Level 1


AOP04.2 A-SMGCS Level 2


AOP05 Airport CDM


AOP10 (PCP) Time-Based Separation

EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) n/a

AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan


AOP12 (PCP) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring


AOP13 (PCP) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing


AOP14 Remote Tower Services Local objective

EFKE - KEMI-TORNIO 0%

ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management Local objective


SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions

100%



<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 67%

COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 10%

COM12 (PCP) NewPENS 53%

FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 10%

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 16%

INF08.1 (PCP) Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile

0%

ITY-ACID Aircraft Identification 50%

ITY-ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information

28%

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services 100%

ITY-AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195

n/a

ITY-FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 92%

ITY-SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 100%


ICAO ASBU Implementation

The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.

These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2018 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/60 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).

Legend:

= Completed (during 2018 or before)

= Missing planning date

= Progress achieved in 2018 = Not applicable

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

B0-APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance

100%

B0-SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A-SMGCS Level 1-2)

100%

B0-FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground-Ground Integration

100%

B0-DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management

100%

28%

B0-ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%

B0-SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground-Based Safety Nets

100%

B0-ACDM Improved Airport Operations through 100%

B0-RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)

100%

B0-FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En-Route Trajectories

100%

B0-NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide view

100%

99%

B0-ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 100%

B0-CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)

100%

82%

B0-TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En-Route

100%


Detailed Objectives Implementation progress

Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

Completed Not yet planned

Ongoing Not Applicable

Planned Missing Data

Late

Main Objectives

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

65% Late

- Implementation is planned according to the timeframe. 31/12/2019

REG (By:12/2018)

FCAA

Aviation act revised in November 2014. Conformance analysis as a part of EUROAT implementation has been completed. EUROAT implementation and publication of Country Chapter depends on the military aviation authority's decision to extend the application of the national military aviation regulations to include foreign military aircraft.

- 40%

Late

31/12/2019

Military Authority

Implementation will require changes to regulations and/or legislation in co-operation with FCAA. - 40% Late

31/12/2019 ASP (By:12/2018)

ANS Finland Implementation and training of staff planned for the year 2019 - 43% Late

31/12/2019

Military Authority MIL has no ANSP role. - %

Not Applicable

- MIL (By:12/2018) Military Authority

Implementation will require changes to regulations and/or legislation possibly in co-operation with FCAA. - 100% Completed

31/12/2015


AOM19.1

ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

53% Late

- Existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by 31/12/2019 31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2018)

ANS Finland Existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by 31/12/2019 - 53% Late

31/12/2019

AOM19.2

ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

52% Ongoing

- LARA & PRISMIL connection to TopSky ATC-system planned by 31/12/2019, compatible with NM system 31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland

LARA & PRISMIL connection to TopSky ATC-system planned by 31/12/2019, compatible with NM system, there are still problems to be solved at Finnish Airforce branch

- 52%

Ongoing

31/12/2019

AOM19.3

Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

40% Ongoing

- LARA connection to TopSky ATC-system and full MIL-connectivity planned by 31/12/2019, enabling AOM19.3 requirements before required FOC date 31/12/2021 31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland LARA connection to TopSky ATC-system and full MIL-connectivity planned by 31/12/2019, enabling AOM19.3 requirements

- 40% Ongoing

31/12/2019

AOM19.4

Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

10% Ongoing

- Heading for FOC 31/12/2021 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland Heading for FOC 31/12/2021 - 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021


AOM21.2

Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

100% Completed

- NEFAB wide continuous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. Further North European multi FAB FRA Borealis is under construction.

12/11/2015

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland

NEFAB wide continuous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. Further North European multi FAB FRA Borealis is under construction.

Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2)

/ Borealis FRA Part 2, Phase 1 /

Borealis FRA Part 2,

Phase 2 / Borealis

Free Route Airspace (Part 1) /

NEFAB FRA / NEFAB Target

Concept / NEFRA

Phase 1 / NEFRA Phase 2

100%

Completed

12/11/2015

AOP04.1

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011

100% Completed

EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. 31/03/2011

REG (By:12/2010)

FCAA A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. - 100% Completed 31/03/2011

ASP (By:12/2011)

ANS Finland

A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. Currently EFHK has got A-SMGCS Level 2 with 3 SMR-s and Mode S Multilateration System. Systems fulfill agreed performance specifications and are in operational use

- 100%

Completed

31/03/2011

APO (By:12/2010) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport

A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. - 100% Completed

31/03/2011


AOP04.2

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed

EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Helsinki-Vantaa Airport A-SMGCS-system fulfills ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.2.1 specifications being A-SMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which were completed and operational in mid Jan 2018

15/01/2018

ASP (By:12/2017)

ANS Finland

Helsinki-Vantaa Airport A-SMGCS-system fulfills ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.2.1 specifications being A-SMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which were completed and operational in mid Jan 2018

- 100%

Completed

15/01/2018


The equipment installed is a Mode S-based vehicle transponder with GPS-receiver - 100%

Completed

30/06/2010

AOP05

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed

EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport CDM was implemented at Helsinki-Vantaa in 2012 31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2016)

ANS Finland CDM was implemented at Helsinki-Vantaa in 2012 - 100% Completed 31/12/2012


CDM was implemented in 2012. - 100% Completed

31/12/2012

AOP10 Time-Based Separation Timescales: - not applicable -

% Not Applicable

EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area)

Not applicable - REG (By:12/2023) ASP (By:12/2023)


AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: - not applicable -

% Not Applicable


Not applicable - ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland - - % Not

Applicable -


- - % Not

Applicable -

AOP12

Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Timescales: - not applicable -

% Not Applicable


Not applicable - ASP (By:12/2020) APO (By:12/2020)

AOP13

Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: - not applicable -

% Not Applicable


EFHK is a non PCP airport - REG (By:12/2023)

FCAA Applicability Area: 25 PCP Airports - %

Not Applicable

- ASP (By:12/2023)


Applicable -


ATC02.8

Ground-Based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed

- Ground systems upgraded to support the APW function. MSAW processing is included in operational systems (EUROCAT). APM was implemented in 2012.

31/10/2012

ASP (By:12/2016)

ANS Finland

Ground systems upgraded to support the APW function. MSAW processing is included in operational systems (EUROCAT). APM was implemented in 2012.

- 100%

Completed

31/10/2012

ATC02.9

Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

100% Completed

- STCA in use for several years, plans for major changes not foreseen in near future 01/01/1999

ASP (By:12/2020)

ANS Finland - - 100% Completed 01/01/1999

ATC07.1

AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019

100% Completed

EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Several versions of arrival Management Tools have been implemented in ACC and APP. 30/11/2005

ASP (By:12/2019)

ANS Finland

Initial arrival management tool functionality is completed since 1999 for Tampere ACC and Helsinki APP, using same equipment (MAESTRO) as in Copenhagen / Malmo. In 2005, an integrated Arrival Manager functionality has been implemented within the adjacent Helsinki / Tallinn TMAs.

- 100%

Completed

30/11/2005

ATC12.1

Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

48% Ongoing

- Original ATC12 Completed, additional ATC12.1 functionality planned and project ongoing according to the ESSIP object, taking into account NEFAB and NEFRA FRA-airspace needs. Implementation in two phases Q1/2019 and Q1/2020.

31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland

Original ATC12 Completed, additional ATC12.1 functionality planned and project ongoing according to the ESSIP object, taking into account NEFAB and NEFRA FRA-airspace needs. Implementation in two phases Q1/2019 and Q1/2020.

- 48%

Ongoing

31/12/2020


ATC15.1

Information Exchange with En-route in Support of AMAN Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019

100% Completed

- Completed in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki-Vantaa Maestro system. 31/12/2000

ASP (By:12/2019)

ANS Finland Completed in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki-Vantaa Maestro system. - 100% Completed

31/12/2000

ATC15.2

Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -

% Not Applicable

- There is no such airport in Finland which would require extended AMAN for surrounding ACC(s). Finland FIR belongs in the affected airspace from the point of Stockholm Arlanda airport. No initiative has been raised by Arlanda towards Finland FIR and thus Finland has no plan for this issue.

-

ASP (By:12/2023)

ANS Finland

There is no such airport in Finland which would require extended AMAN for surrounding ACC(s). Finland FIR belongs in the affected airspace from the point of Stockholm Arlanda airport. No initiative has been raised by Arlanda towards Finland FIR and thus Finland has no plan for this issue.

- %

Not Applicable

-

ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

100% Completed

- Fully completed and operational between Finland-Estonia 6/2014 30/06/2014

ASP (By:12/2018)

ANS Finland Fully completed and operational between Finland-Estonia 6/2014 - 100% Completed

30/06/2014

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

67% Late

- Basic AMHS implemented in 2010 but delays involved in various project phases for extended AMHS 31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2018)

ANS Finland Basic AMHS implemented in 2010 but delays involved in various project phases for extended AMHS - 67% Late

31/12/2019


COM11

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

10% Ongoing

- This objective is expected to be implemented within the given time frame though schedule-risks has been risen due to commercial complaints against selected manufacturer and a new tendering process is now needed

31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)

ANS Finland

This objective is expected to be implemented within the given time frame though schedule-risks has been risen due to commercial complaints against selected manufacturer and a new tendering process is now needed

- 10%

Ongoing

31/12/2020

COM12

New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020

53% Ongoing

- - 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2024)

ANS Finland

ANS Finland is partner of NewPENS-project funded by INEA (INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2015/1132363 / Action 2015-EU-TM-0196-M / Activity 11) and coordinated by Eurocontrol and thereon in schedule

- 43%

Ongoing

31/12/2020


ANS Finland is representing Helsinki-Vantaa Airport. - 75% Ongoing

31/12/2020

COM12

New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020

53% Ongoing

- - 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2024) 31/12/2020

ANS Finland

ANS Finland is partner of NewPENS-project funded by INEA (INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2015/1132363 / Action 2015-EU-TM-0196-M / Activity 11) and coordinated by Eurocontrol and thereon in schedule

- 43%

Ongoing

31/12/2020


ANS Finland is representing Helsinki-Vantaa Airport. - 75% Ongoing

31/12/2020


ENV01

Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

82% Ongoing

EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia. 31/12/2023

ASP (By:12/2023)

ANS Finland The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia.

- 78% Ongoing

31/12/2023


The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia.

- 100% Completed

31/12/2009

FCM03

Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

98% Late

- Full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year 2019 31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2017)

ANS Finland

Functionality installed and available but problems so far at NM within automatically processing and firmly specifying the use of AFP-messages in the Free Route Airspace environment causes that full FoC implementation of collaborative flight planning is estimated to take place not before year 2019. Though all functionality has been installed according to spec, the interoperability between Thales TopSky and NM system has not been achieved due to complicated FRA operations environment, not fully covered at NM.

- 98%

Late

31/12/2019

FCM04.1

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -

% Not Applicable

- N/A -

ASP (By:10/2017)

ANS Finland N/A - % Not

Applicable -


FCM04.2

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

10% Ongoing

- Planning started, for Finland STAM 1 or 2 has not been a requirement before year 2016, though many of STAM 1 functionalities are operational and will form a basis for STAM 2. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland

Planning started, for Finland STAM 1 or 2 has not been a requirement before year 2016, though many of STAM 1 functionalities are operational and will form a basis for STAM 2.

- 10%

Ongoing

31/12/2021

FCM05

Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

33% Ongoing

- Project exist to implement the interactive rolling NOP. INEA funding is under progress, within the scope of SESAR Deployment Programme 2015. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP. Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/2021

- 10% Ongoing

31/12/2021


Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP. Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/2021

- 55% Ongoing

31/12/2021

FCM06

Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

10% Ongoing

- Planned according to objective FOC. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland Initial research launched. - 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021

FCM08

Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

10% Ongoing

- Project started, FOC planned Q4/2021 30/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland Project started, FOC planned Q4/2021 - 10% Ongoing 30/12/2021


INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018

16% Late

- Planning in progress. The objective is expected to be completed by the end of 2020. 31/12/2020

REG (By:05/2018)

FCAA

A project group consisting of all relevant stakeholders has been established to create the National TOD Policy and implementation programme. Drafting of implementation programme is in progress.

- 23%

Late

31/12/2020

ASP (By:05/2018)

ANS Finland Project in progress - 10% Late 31/12/2020


Planning in progress - 10% Late

31/12/2020

INF08.1

Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2024

0% Planned

- Planned FOC by 31/12/2024 31/12/2024

ASP (By:12/2024)

ANS Finland Planned FOC by 31/12/2024 - 0% Planned 31/12/2024

Finnish Meteorological Institute

Development phase, no finalized implementation plan yet. FOC by 31/12/2024 - 0%

Not yet planned

- MIL (By:12/2024)

Military Authority MIL has no ANSP/AIS -role. - %

Not Applicable

- APO (By:12/2024) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport

Planned FOC by 31/12/2024 - 0% Planned

31/12/2024


ITY-ACID

Aircraft Identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020

50% Late

- Planning in progress, see ASP comment. 30/11/2020

ASP (By:01/2020)

ANS Finland

Project in progress, the A/C link and ACID capability is technically ready (DAPS, Downlinked Aircraft ParameterS) for ATM-system TopSky. The operational use of ACID is planned to happen country wide by 31/11/2020 when the WAM and Mode-S sensors will cover entire Finland FIR. With WAM system there has been delays due to financial problems of the system provider.

- 50%

Late

30/11/2020

ITY-ADQ

Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

28% Late

- The requirements of this objective have been postponed until forecasted FoC 12/2020 31/12/2020

REG (By:06/2017)

FCAA The requirements of this objective have been extremely challenging to meet, it is estimated that implementation will not take place until 12/2020.

- 62% Late

31/12/2020

ASP (By:06/2017)

ANS Finland

ANS Finland has started FAIMS project, covering the ITY-ADQ requirements, planned implementation by Q2/2020. System fulfills ADQ requirements for aeronautical information management and production of AIP. It also provides data origination tools for other parties. However, the other parties are not directly involved in the FAIMS project.

- 27%

Late

30/06/2020


- - 10% Late

30/06/2019


ITY-AGDL

Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/2009 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

100% Completed

- ANS Finland has informed 24.11.2017 delays to SESAR Deployment Manager (SDM) concerning the installation time and the reasons of delays. Due to delivery time of needed systems and busy with other customers both of the Telecommunication (Datalink) service providers were not able to deliver needed systems during the required time frame. ANS Finland is aware of this regulation and actions have been planned to fulfill the regulation requirements. Relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by ANS Finland. ARINC-services are believed to become available not before than Q2/2020.

01/01/2019

REG (By:02/2018)

FCAA

ANS Finland has informed 24.11.2017 delays to SESAR Deployment Manager (SDM) concerning the installation delays. Relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by ANS Finland.

- 100%

Completed

31/12/2018

ASP (By:02/2018)

ANS Finland

The A/G radiolink service, will be hired from ARINC and SITA. SITA service is running, ARINC has not yet confirmed if this can be done by Q4/2019 but more likely Q2/2020

- 100%

Completed

31/12/2018

MIL (By:01/2019) Military Authority

25% of transport-type State aircraft have been equipped. No intention/plan for further updates. - 100% Completed

01/01/2019


ITY-AGVCS2

8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

% Not Applicable

- Finland has notified the European Commission of temporary derogations from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 on 12.12.2016. The Finnish Transport Safety Agency grants exemptions from the requirements in Articles 4(5) 31.12.2027, 5(4) 1.1.2028 and 6(10) 31.12.2028. Approval of derogations from commission by letter received 08/08/2018.

-

REG (By:12/2018)

FCAA The requirements have been implemented within the timeframe of the notification to the EC. - 100% Completed

31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018)

Military Authority MIL has no service provision role. - %

Not Applicable

-

ANS Finland ITY-AGVCS2: 8,33 kHz radio-ready 100 % at Q1/2019, FOC gradually by 12/2027 as granted by Regulator. - %

Not Applicable

- MIL (By:12/2020) Military Authority

All aircraft that will be in use after implementation date are equipped with 8,33kHz radios. - 100% Completed

31/12/2017 APO (By:12/2018)

Military Authority MIL has no service provision/APO role. - %

Not Applicable

- HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport

ITY-AGVCS2: 8,33 kHz radio-ready 100 % at Q1/2019, FOC gradually by 12/2027 as granted by Regulator. - %

Not Applicable

-

ITY-FMTP

Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

92% Late

- Planned operational by 30 Jun 2019, delayed due to lack of resources. 30/06/2019

ASP (By:12/2014)

ANS Finland Planned operational by 30 Jun 2019, delayed due to lack of resources. - 92% Late

30/06/2019 MIL (By:12/2014)

Military Authority

Integrated civil-military airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. - %

Not Applicable

-


ITY-SPI

Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADS-B Out in transport-type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 ELS in transport-type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

100% Completed

- The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. All REG and ASP SloAs are completed. Remaining SloAs will be completed within the timeframe of the regulation.

31/12/2018

REG (By:02/2015)

FCAA The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. - 100% Completed

31/12/2014 ASP (By:02/2015)

ANS Finland

The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. (In the preceding LSSIPs there were texts about plans to introduce WAM-systems but due to various technical and commercial problems, the plans have been halted so far)

- 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

MIL (By:06/2020)

Military Authority

MIL has no role in ANSP/surveillance capability issues. All transport type aircraft have MODE S -capabilities and will be updated to ADS-B OUT within timescale.

- 100% Completed

31/12/2018

NAV03.1

RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

100% Completed

- P-RNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. 31/12/2005

ASP (By:12/2023)

ANS Finland

P-RNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. The feasibility and benefits from P-RNAV in other Finnish TMAs, and furthermore in the joint adjacent Helsinki/Tallinn TMAs has been assessed in 2005 and P-RNAV routes have been implemented.

- 100%

Completed

31/12/2005


NAV03.2

RNP 1 in TMA Operations (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -

% Not Applicable

- - -

ASP (By:12/2023)

ANS Finland

Planned but FoC date is not known. However, Helsinki-Vantaa is not among the PCP airports, so, actually this Object is Not Applicable for EFHK

- 0%

Planned

31/12/2023

NAV10

RNP Approach Procedures with Vertical Guidance Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

100% Completed

- APV/Baro VNAV procedures will be published by the end of year 2016. 30/11/2016

REG (By:12/2023)

FCAA Finland applies criteria published by EASA. Specifically, AMC 20-26 and AMC 20-27. - 100% Completed

25/08/2016 ASP (By:12/2023)

ANS Finland - - 100% Completed 30/11/2016

SAF11

Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018

100% Completed

- Finland is compliant with the relevant parts of EAPPRE. 31/12/2015

REG (By:01/2018)

FCAA The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions have been implemented utilizing the Finnish Aviation Safety Plan.

- 100% Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2014)

ANS Finland Requirements fulfilled during 2014. - 100% Completed 31/12/2014


Requirements fulfilled during 2014. - 100% Completed

31/12/2014

Military Authority

MIL has no service provision/APO role. Applicable measures of the action plan concerning aircraft operators have been implemented.

- 100% Completed

31/12/2014


Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring

AOM21.1

Direct Routing (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -

% Not Applicable

- NEFAB wide continues FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL95 to FL660. -

ASP (By:12/2017)


Applicable -

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 for en-route operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013

100% Completed

- Implemented in 2012. 30/04/2012

ASP (By:01/2013)

ANS Finland Implemented in 2012 - 100% Completed 30/04/2012

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

100% Completed

- The requirements stemming from Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011 of 16 December 2011 laying down common airspace usage requirements and operating procedures for airborne collision avoidance have been implemented in Finland.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

FCAA All REG SloA's are completed. - 100% Completed 31/12/2015

ASP (By:03/2012)

ANS Finland Training completed in 2012. ACAS performance monitoring has been in place since 2008. - 100% Completed

31/05/2012 MIL (By:12/2015)

Military Authority

Transport type -aircraft equipped with TCAS II 7.0 or TCAS I. No update planned. ACAS II functionalities are trained during flight cadets training for tactical aircraft.

- 100% Completed

31/03/2012

FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006

100% Completed

- Objective has been completed. 30/11/2010

ASP (By:07/2014)

ANS Finland Completed 2010 - 100% Completed 30/11/2010


ITY-COTR

Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

- The system requirements derived from the regulations 1032/2006 and 30/2009 are expected to be finalized within the timeframe of the regulations. 30/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2012)

ANS Finland Planned according to the regulations (1032/2006, 29/2009 and 30/2009). - 100% Completed

30/12/2012 MIL (By:12/2012)

Military Authority

Integrated civil-military airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. - %

Not Applicable

-


Local Objectives

Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area.

AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local % Planned

EFKE - KEMI-TORNIO The possibility to implement remote aerodrome ATS in some of the small aerodromes will be investigated further, KEMI-TORNIO just mentioned as one candidate. 31/12/2022

ATC18 Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T Applicability and timescale: Local

% Planned

- Under investigation, feasibility study ongoing whether a project should be initiated 31/12/2023

ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Applicability and timescale: Local % Completed

EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Finavia's co-operation with operators is continuous. Procedures are planned according to environmental etc. demands. 31/12/2012

ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local % Ongoing

EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Approximately 70% of departures are CCO 31/12/2019

NAV12 Optimised Low-Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Applicability and timescale: Local

% Not Applicable

- Not Applicable, no IFR routes published for Rotorcraft -


ANNEXES

Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Finland

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP National Focal Point Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom

Jouko RANTA

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom

Jouko RANTA

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Air Navigation Services Finland Pekka VIRTANEN

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Finavia Corporation Heikki ISOMAA

LSSIP Focal Point for Military Military Aviation Authority Heikki KUORELAHTI and Timo VÄHÄMÄKI

LSSIP Focal Point for MET SP Finnish Meteorological Institute Jaakko NUOTTOKARI and Terhi NIKKANEN

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person DECMA/ACS/PRM Luca DELL’ORTO


National stakeholders’ organisation charts

Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom


Finavia Corporation



CEO

Supportingfunctions

Operationalplanning and

operative ATC-units

Technical planningand operations

Safety and Compliance

Annual meeting of shareholders

Board


Finnish Meteorological Institute


Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR, ICAO and DP

Objective SESAR

Key Feature ICAO ASBU B0 and B1

DP Family

AOM13.1

- -

AOM19.1 B1-FRTO B1-NOPS

3.1.1 ASM Tool to support AFUA


3.1.2 ASM management of real time airspace data


3.1.3 Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing


3.1.4 Management of dynamic airspace configurations

AOM21.1

B0-FRTO -

AOM21.2 B1-FRTO 3.2.1 Upgrade of ATM systems to support Direct Routing and Free Routing 3.2.4 Implement Free Route Airspace

AOP04.1

B0-SURF 2.2.1 A-SMGCS level 1 and 2

AOP04.2

B0-SURF 2.2.1 A-SMGCS level 1 and 2

AOP05

B0-ACDM B0-RSEQ

2.1.1 Initial DMAN 2.1.3 Basic A-CDM

AOP10

B1-RSEQ 2.3.1 Time Based Separation (TBS)

AOP11

B1-ACDM 2.1.4 Initial Airport Operations Plan (AOP)

AOP12 - 2.1.2 Electronic Flight Strips (EFS) 2.5.1 Airport Safety Nets associated with A-SMGCS level 2 2.5.2

AOP13

B1-ACDM B1-RSEQ

2.4.1 A-SMGCS Routing and Planning Functions

AOP14

B1-RATS -

ATC02.2 B0-SNET -

ATC02.8 B0-SNET B1-SNET

3.2.1 Upgrade of ATM systems to support Direct Routing and Free Routing

ATC02.9 B0-SNET B1-SNET

-

ATC07.1

B0-RSEQ 1.1.1 Basic AMAN

ATC12.1

B1-FRTO 3.2.1 Upgrade of ATM systems to support Direct Routing and Free Routing

ATC15.1

B1-RSEQ 1.1.2 AMAN upgrade to include Extended Horizon function

ATC15.2

B1-RSEQ 1.1.2 AMAN upgrade to include Extended Horizon function

ATC16 B0-ACAS -

ATC17

- 3.2.1 Upgrade of ATM systems to support Direct Routing and Free Routing


ATC18

- No direct link, although implementation is recommended in Family 3.2.1

COM10

- -

COM11 - 3.1.4 Management of Dynamic Airspace Configurations 3.2.1 Upgrade of systems (NM, ANSPs, AUs) to support Direct Routings (DCTs) and Free Routing Airspace (FRA)

COM12

B1-SWIM

5.1.2 NewPENS: New Pan-European Network Service 5.2.1 Stakeholders Internet Protocol Compliance

ENV01 B0-CDO B1-CDO

-

ENV02

- -

ENV03

B0-CCO -

FCM01 B0-NOPS -

FCM03

B0-NOPS 4.2.3 Interface ATM systems to NM systems

FCM04.1

- 4.1.1 STAM phase 1

FCM04.2

B0-NOPS 4.1.2 STAM phase 2

FCM05 B1-ACDM B1-NOPS

4.2.2 Interactive Rolling NOP 4.2.4 AOP/NOP Information Sharing

FCM06

B1-NOPS 4.4.2 Traffic Complexity tools

FCM07 B1-NOPS 4.3.1 - Target Time for ATFCM purposes 4.3.2 - Reconciled target times for ATFCM and arrival sequencing

FCM08

B1-FICE 4.2.3 Interface ATM systems to NM systems

FCM09

B1-NOPS -

INF04 B0-DATM -

INF07

- 1.2.2 Geographical database for procedure design

INF08.1 B1-DATM B1-SWIM

5.1.3, 5.1.4, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1, 5.6.1

INF08.2 B1-DATM B1-SWIM

5.1.3, 5.1.4, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.6.2

ITY-ACID

- -

ITY-ADQ

B0-DATM 1.2.2 Geographical database for procedure design

ITY-AGDL

B0-TBO

6.1.1 ATN B1 based services in ATSP domain 6.1.3 A/G and G/G Multi Frequency DL Network in defined European Service Areas 6.1.4 ATN B1 capability in Multi Frequency environment in Aircraft Domain

ITY-AGVCS2

- -

ITY-COTR B0-FICE -

ITY-FMTP B0-FICE B1-FICE

-

ITY-SPI

B0-ASUR -


NAV03.1 B0-CDO B0-CCO

B1-RSEQ -

NAV03.2 B1-RSEQ 1.2.3 RNP 1 Operations in high density TMAs (ground capabilities) 1.2.4 RNP 1 Operations (aircraft capabilities)

NAV10 B0-APTA 1.2.1 RNP APCH with vertical guidance 1.2.2 Geographic Database for procedure design

NAV12

B1-APTA -

SAF11

- -

Legend:

Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:

Optimised ATM Network Services

High Performing Airport Operations




Glossary of abbreviations

This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Finland.

Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in:


Term Description

AF ATM Functionality

FT Fast Track

PCP Pilot Common Project

PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme

NEFAB North European Functional Airspace Block

NEFRA North European Free Route Airspace

S-AF Sub ATM Functionality

SIA Safety Investigation Authority

SNAB Strategic Nordic Military ATM Board

