local single sky implementation (lssip) turkey · the introduction of a new smart atc system is a...
TRANSCRIPT
Year 2014 - Level 1
EUROCONTROL
Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) TURKEY
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey Released Issue
DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET
LSSIP for Turkey
Infocentre Reference: 15/01/12-40
Document Identifier Edition: Year 2014
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey Edition Date: 30/04/15
LSSIP Focal Point - Cihan SAHIN E-mail: [email protected] ATC Expert
LSSIP Contact Person - Predrag
VRANJKOVIC E-mail:
[email protected] Unit DPS/PEPR
Status Intended for
Working Draft General Public
Draft Agency Stakeholders
Proposed Issue Restricted Audience
Released Issue
Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)
Path: Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Turkey (TR) - PV\Year 2014\Released\LSSIP Year 2014 TR_Released.docx
LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material
2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2013 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr
3 ESSIP Report 2012 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr
4 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor
5 Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries
6 European ATM Master Plan https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/
7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey Released Issue
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1
Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4
Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geographical Scope ................................................................................................................ 5
1.1.1 International Membership ......................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) ..................................................................................... 5 1.1.1 Airspace Classification and Organisation ................................................................................. 5 1.2 National Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 5
1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 DHMI ......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.3 Airports ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.4 Military Authorities ..................................................................................................................... 9
Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity ............................................................................................................ 12 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Turkey .................................................................................................. 12
2.1.1 ANKARA ACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ............................................. 13 2.1.2 ISTANBUL ACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 .......................................... 13 2.2 Summer 2014 performance ................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 ................................................................................................... 14
Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ........................................................................................ 17
Chapter 4 - National Projects ................................................................................................................. 18
Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ....................................................................................................... 20 5.1 FAB Co-ordination ................................................................................................................. 20 5.2 Regional cooperation ............................................................................................................. 20
5.2.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives ............................................................................................. 20
Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ....................................................................................... 21 6.1 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress .......................................................................... 22 6.1 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ........................................... 35
ANNEXES
Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process
Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts
Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 1 Released Issue
Executive Summary
National ATM Context
Civil aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Commission. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is the Turkish Regulatory Authority which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council and DHMI is the unique civil ANSP in Turkey.
Devlet Hava Meydanlari Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate general of State Airports of Turkey (www.dhmi.gov.tr) is the unique provider of Civil Air Navigation Services for Turkey. DHMI is a 100 % State-owned Governmental department.
According to SHY- Gözetim which was enacted in parallel ESARR 1, DGCA Air Navigation Department undertakes the NSA responsibilities.
Traffic and Capacity
Traffic in Turkey increased by 11.0% during summer 2014 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2013.
The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 4.5% and 7.1% for Turkey during the 5 year planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 6.1%.
ESSIP Objective Implementation
The introduction of a new SMART ATC System is a major project in Turkey, which is close to finalisation (in 2015). Therefore some technical objectives were finalised by end of 2014 (such as COM10). Others are planned to be finalised by the end of 2015, ATC objectives for example.
LSSIP 2014 - Turkey
* FOC Date █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)
State-related ESSIP Objectives
<=
2008
20
09
2010
20
11
2012
20
13
2014
20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
2020
20
21
AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling
[IDP] [E] *
AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [IDP] [E] *
AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [IDP] [E] *
AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions [IDP] * ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict
Alert (STCA) - level 2 [E] *
ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 [E] *
ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 [E] *
ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 [E] *
ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools [E] ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and
conformance monitoring [E] *
ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations
[IDP] [E] *
ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller
during Coordination and Transfer [IDP]
[E] *
COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP)
[IDP] * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS *
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 2 Released Issue
LSSIP 2014 - Turkey
* FOC Date █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)
COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM *
FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services [E] * FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [IDP]
[E] *
FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 [IDP] [E]
FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [IDP] [E] *
INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) *ITY-ACID Aircraft identification ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical
information [E]
ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [IDP] [E]
ITY-AGVCS2 Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195
ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes [E]
ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV [E] * NAV10 Implement APV procedures [IDP]
[E] *
SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements *
SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions *SRC-RLMK Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory
Requirements (ESARRs) * SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies *
Airport-related ESSIP Objectives
<=
2008
20
09
2010
20
11
2012
20
13
2014
20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
2020
20
21
LTAC-Ankara
AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1
[E] * AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and
Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 *LTAI-Antalya AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and
Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 [E] *
AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 *
AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP] [E] *
ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements
[IDP] * ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management
(CEM) at Airports * LTBA-Istanbul
AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1
[E] * AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and
Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 *AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP]
[E] * ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO)
techniques for environmental improvements [IDP] *
ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports *
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 3 Released Issue
Understanding the Table
Objective Completed No Plan
Objective Partly Completed Missing Data
Objective Planned Not Applicable (Turkey does not participate in this obj.)
Late
E= Essential – Master Plan Reference IDP = Interim Deployment Programme
NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 4 Released Issue
Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document – Year 2014 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2014.
The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.
Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;
Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;
Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;
Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;
Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.
Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.
Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 5 Released Issue
Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment
1.1 Geographical Scope
1.1.1 International Membership
Turkey is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since
ECAC 1955
EUROCONTROL 1989
European Union NA
EASA NA
ICAO 1945
NATO 1952
ITU 1866
1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s)
The geographical scope of this document addresses the Ankara and Istanbul FIRs. There is no separation between the lower and the upper airspace in the Turkish FIRs.
1.1.1 Airspace Classification and Organisation
Turkey is evaluating the implementation of ICAO classification for both present and future systems. Airspace reorganisation as a result of studies is planned. It is not yet possible to predict when this will be completed.
1.2 National Stakeholders
The main National Stakeholders involved within ATM in Turkey are the following:
- The Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication;
- The Directorate General of Civil Aviation – DGCA;
- The Devlet Hava Meydanlari Isletmesi (Directorate General of State Airports (Turkey) – DHMI;
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 6 Released Issue
- The Turkish Military Authority; and
- The Turkish State Meteorological Service.
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters.
Civil aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Commission. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is the Turkish Regulatory Authority which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council, and DHMI is the unique civil ANSP in Turkey.
The Military Authorities permit some military aerodromes to be used by civil aviation in order to improve air transport links within Turkey.
Civil ATM incidents are investigated by the “Investigation and Assessment Commission” which reports incidents and investigation findings to the DGCA. The commission is formed from experts with sufficient qualifications. Where requested by the DHMI and/or if DGCA consider it necessary, experts from DGCA will also join the commission in accordance with SHY 65-02. For civil or civil/military ATM related incidents occurring within the Military Terminal Area and military joint user airports, the DGCA will receive all documentation/reports concerning the incident from the military authorities and a joint investigation will be carried out.
The Advisory and Steering Committee holds regular (quarterly) meetings with the participation of aviation organisations as coordinated by the DGCA to classify incidents, prepare statistical data, evaluate reports of the “Investigation and Assessment Commission” and to impose actions and/or give recommendations to the aviation community to prevent the re-occurrence of similar incidents. The committee has the authority to include any aviation related issue on its agenda. Members of this Committee are comprised from the following organisations as appropriate:
• DGCA (www.shgm.gov.tr)
• DHMI (www.dhmi.gov.tr)
• Military Authorities
• School of Civil Aviation (Aviation Experts)
• Turkish Airline Pilots’ Association (TALPA)
• Air Traffic Controllers Association of Turkey
• Other related stakeholders.
1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)
1.2.1.1 General information
Civil Aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table overleaf. The DGCA is further detailed in the following sections.
Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis
Rule-making DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431
Safety Oversight DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431
Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements
DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431
Airspace DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431
Economic Ministry of Transport, maritime Affairs and Communication
Environment DGCA and Ministry of Environment and Urbanism
Security DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431
Accident investigation Investigation and Assessment Commission
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 7 Released Issue
1.2.1.2 DGCA
The Regulator is the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The DGCA is a body within the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication with its own operating budget. The CAA responsibility is processed by DGCA.
The DGCA is responsible for:
Licensing of Aircrew and Engineers
Licensing of Air Traffic Controllers
Licensing of ATSEPs
Certificate of Airworthiness (CoA) of aircraft
Approval of all airborne electronic equipment
Oversight and certification of airports
Investigation of Incidents by means of participation in Investigation and Assessment Commission and holding Advisory and Steering Committee Meetings.
Approval and generation of all ATM rules/regulations (including ESARRs) in coordination with stakeholders (DHMI, Turkish Air Force General Staff and other bodies as appropriate).
Economic regulation is carried out by the Turkish Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication.
Annual Report published: N
www.shgm.gov.tr
Organisation chart is shown in Annex B of this document.
1.2.2 DHMI
Devlet Hava Meydanları Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate General of State Airports of Turkey (www.dhmi.gov.tr) is the unique Provider of Civil Air Navigation Services for Turkey. DHMI is a 100 % State-owned Governmental department. DHMI provides all the Air Traffic Services within civil airspace (Controlled Airspace, TMA and CTRs).
DHMI cooperates very closely with the DGCA, particularly on safety matters such as the implementation of the ESARRs.
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 8 Released Issue
Name of the ANSP: Devlet Hava Meydanları Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate General of State Airports of Turkey (www.dhmi.gov.tr)
Governance: Governmental department Ownership: 100% State owned
Services provided Y/N Comment
ATC en-route Y
ATC approach Y
ATC Airport(s) Y
AIS Y
CNS Y
MET N Turkish State Meteorological Service
ATCO training Y
Others Y Airport management
Additional information:
Provision of services in other State(s):
N
Number of air traffic controllers
ACC 385
APP 265
TWR 278
Annual Report published: Y http://www.dhmi.gov.tr/dosyalar/annualreport/2012/ANNUAL_REPORT_2012.pdf
www.dhmi.gov.tr
Organisation chart is shown in Annex B.
1.2.2.1 ATC system in use
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Selex ES
Major upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned?
2015 (SMART)
1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 9 Released Issue
1.2.2.2 ATC units
En-route air navigation services throughout Turkish Airspace from two Area Control Centers located in Ankara and İstanbul. İzmir Approach Control Unit also provides area control service for southern part of İstanbul FIR. There are 24 TMAs and 12 MTMAs in Turkish Airspace. Description of the ATC units providing the services and their areas of responsibility; Size of the ATC unit (maximum number of sectors); Service provided (en-route or TMA – no more ref to TWR);
The ATC units in the Turkish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:
ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks
En-route TMA
Ankara ACC 10 2 Ankara The sector structure is currently stable with the Interim SMART system introduced. Ultimately there will be single pan-Turkey ACC located in Ankara
Istanbul ACC 4 7 Istanbul Izmir ACC 4 2
Antalya APP 6 Ankara
Dalaman APP 3 İstanbul
1.2.3 Airports
1.2.3.1 General information
Turkey has 55 airports used by GAT. These range from busy international airports to small regional airports with perhaps ten or less movements daily.
Air navigation service is provided for all airports by DHMI except Eskişehir Anadolu, İzmir Efes and İstanbul Hezarfen Airports.
1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP
The airports covered by this LSSIP document are as follows: - Istanbul Atatürk airport - Antalya airport, and - Ankara Esenboga airport.
1.2.4 Military Authorities
The military authorities also play a major role in managing the Turkish Airspace especially with regard to FUA. Military ATC is entirely separated from Civil ATC, although very good civil/military co-ordination is maintained. Co-ordination between the military authorities and the DHMI is ensured through a Civil-Military Co-ordination Group. Some (11) airports/airfields of military origin are jointly used by military and civil aviation. For the eight (8) airports of them, all aircraft are under military ATC control.
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 10 Released Issue
Currently, Turkish Military and DHMI have their own alternative FUA concept which is considered more suitable for the local geo-political situation. In order to increase the capacity of Turkish airspace, with implementation of the SMART system, DHMI and the Military Authorities are planning to implement EUROCONTROL Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) concept to do that necessary legislation has been published at Official Gazette dated 18 April 2014. The studies are going on to establish infrastructure and units. The military regulatory, service provision and user role within ATM is detailed below.
1.2.4.1 Regulatory role
Regulatory framework and rule-making
Oversight
1.2.4.2 Service Provision role
OAT GAT
OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?
Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?
Y
Level of such legal provision: State Law 2920. Level of such legal provision: State Law 2920
Authority signing such legal provision: Parliament Authority signing such legal provision: Parliament
These provisions cover: These provisions cover:
Rules of the Air for OAT N
Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y
OAT/GAT Coordination Y OAT/GAT Coordination Y
ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y
ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing Y
ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N
ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N
Aircrew Training (only military pilots) Y ESARR applicability N
Aircrew Licensing N
Additional Information: Other than the State Law 2920 which grants provision for OAT the Turkish Air Force operate under different State or NATO regulations.
Additional Information: There is a protocol between the General Staff and Ministry of Transport, Maritime affairs and Communication for the use of military airports by civil aircraft.
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
National AIP Y National AIP Y
National Military AIP N/A National Military AIP N
EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N
Other N/A Other: N/A
OAT GAT
National oversight body for OAT: Turkish General Staff HQ
National Supervisory Authority (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A-
OAT GAT
Services Provided: Services Provided:
En-Route N/A En-Route N
Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA Y
Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y
AIS Y AIS Y
MET N Turkish State MET Turkish State Meteorological N
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 11 Released Issue
1.2.4.1 User role
1.2.4.2 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
Meteorological Service Service
SAR Y
By the Turkish Air Force for both OAT and GAT
SAR By the Turkish Air Force for both OAT and GAT
Y
TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y
Other: Security Services Other: Security Services
Additional Information: Additional Information:
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?
OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y
If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:
Free Routing Within specific corridors only
Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y
Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service
If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:
No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y
Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y
CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y
Others: The above exemptions do not apply to military heavy transport or VIP aircraft.
Military in Turkey applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: N
FUA Level 1 implemented: N
FUA Level 2 implemented: N
FUA Level 3 implemented: N
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 12 Released Issue
Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity
2.1 Evolution of traffic in Turkey
2014
Traffic in Turkey increased by 11.0% during Summer 2014 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2013.
2015-2019
The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 4.5% and 7.1% for Turkey during the 5 year planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 6.1%.
0
500.000
1.000.000
1.500.000
2.000.000
2.500.000
2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F
IFR
flig
hts
Turkey - Annual IFR Movements
IFR movements - Actuals
IFR movements - Baseline forecast
IFR movements - High forecast
IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast
2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F
H 11.2% 8.0% 6.6% 7.9% 5.4% 7.6% 9.1%
B 7.6% 2.6% 7.1% 10.8% 6.0% 6.4% 6.7% 3.9% 7.7% 8.8%
L 10.4% 3.8% 4.3% 4.8% 4.6% 5.0% 4.8%
ESRA08 B 3.1% -2.4% -1.1% 1.8% 2.4% 2.8% 2.3% 2.3% 2.8% 3.1%
EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2014)IFR flights yearly growth
Turkey
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 13 Released Issue
2.1.1 ANKARA ACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019
2.1.2 ISTANBUL ACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Peak Day Traffic 2336 2685 2445 2587 2995
Summer Traffic 1981 2186 2193 2312 2626
Yearly Traffic 1760 1914 1928 2037 2260
Summer Traffic Forecast 2767 2948 3147 3295 3534
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 2823 3030 3273 3463 3717
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 2723 2833 2964 3102 3256
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.11 0.26 0.18 0.11 0.11
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.09 0.19 0.21 0.14 0.14
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
En
rou
te D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
gh
t)
IFR
flig
hts
(D
aily
Ave
rag
e)
LTAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Peak Day Traffic 2623 2865 2821 3000 3476
Summer Traffic 2169 2375 2418 2613 2922
Yearly Traffic 1842 2003 2050 2216 2445
Summer Traffic Forecast 3110 3309 3540 3646 3939
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 3179 3378 3629 3790 4069
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 3045 3180 3337 3490 3664
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
En
rou
te D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
gh
t)
IFR
flig
hts
(D
aily
Ave
rag
e)
LTBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 14 Released Issue
2.2 Summer 2014 performance
Traffic Evolution 2014 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity
gap Ref value Actual
Ankara: + 13.6%
Istanbul: +11.8%
Ankara: 161 (+7%)
Istanbul: 154 (+12%)
Izmir: 68 (0%)
0.19 0.1 No
Average enroute delay per flight in Ankara ACC remained at 0.1 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 60% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity and 40% for the reason Other.
Capacity Plan Achieved Comments
Improved civil/military coordination Yes
ATS route structure development Yes
Additional controllers (45 per year for en-route) Yes
New Ankara ACC (Max 25 physical sectors + 5 optional) - Implementation of SMART system Ongoing
Provisional Site Acceptance Tests completed – Preparation for transition on-going
Mode S Yes To be operational with SMART
Maximum configuration: 20 sectors Yes
Summer 2014 performance assessment
Ankara: The capacity baseline of 161 was calculated with ACCESS, representing the capacity offered during the measured period. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 156 and the peak 3 hour demand was 141. A maximum configuration of 11 sectors was opened. Istanbul: The capacity baseline of 154 was calculated with ACCESS, representing the capacity offered during the measured period. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 147 and the peak 3 hour demand was 139. A maximum configuration of 3 sectors was opened. Izmir:
The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 60 and the peak 3 hour demand was 53. A maximum configuration of 6 sectors was opened, including APP sectors.
2.3 Planning Period 2015-2019
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.150.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.22
AnnualSummer
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesLTAACTA
H 237 N/A 251 6% 267 6% 281 5% 298 6%
Ref. 231 N/A 244 6% 258 6% 269 4% 288 7%
L 227 N/A 236 4% 246 4% 256 4% 269 5%
Open 227 N/A 238 5% 252 6% 263 4% 280 6%
C/R 227 N/A 241 6% 254 5% 266 5% 284 7%
LTAA 161
Capacity Profiles
ACC2014
baseline Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 15 Released Issue
Capacity Plan
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Free Route Airspace Stepped implementation of direct/free route
operations above FL290
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
Improved civil/military coordination
Airport & TMA Network Integration
AMAN/DMAN at LTBA
CDM will be operational
before the end of year 2015 at
LTBA Cooperative Traffic
Management Improved ATFCM, including STAM
Airspace
ATS route structure development Reconfigurationof ACC/APP with DFL 235
and 335
Gradual upper airspace re-sectorisation (20 to 25 sectors +
FL235)
Improved route structure and
sectorisation in the N & NE
sectors to adapt to the new traffic
flows
Procedures
New LoA with Teheran
New interface alternatives with Sofia
Staffing Additional controllers (45 per year for en-route)
Technical
New Ankara ACC (Max 25
physical sectors + 5 optional) -
Implementation of SMART
system
Capacity
RTS of Turkish airspace –
Autumn 2015
Significant Events
Transition to SMART and new Ankara
ACC, including transition of all
Turkish airspace above
FL 235 to Ankara ACC
Independent parallel runway
and new ground
infrastructure at LTFJ
New airport in Istanbul Phase 1: End 2017-Beg 2018
New APP control office
for LTFJ
Max sectors 20 25 25 25 25
Capacity increase p.a. Capacity: 237 6% 6% 6% 6%
Reference profile Capacity: 231 6% 6% 4% 7%
Additional information
Note: DHMI is planning sufficient capacity to cope with expected demand, and no capacity reduction linked to the transition to SMART. However, some delays and restrictions might be necessary due to the crisis situation in neighbouring states, shifting and concentrating traffic flows in some sectors of Ankara ACC. As from Spring 2015, Istanbul and Izmir will be serving for approach control up to FL235. En-route service will be under responsibility of Ankara ACC. SMART: - Training: On-going. No delays are expected - Transition plan: November 2014 : Provisional/technical acceptance tests completed December 2014 – Spring 2015: Technical transition and shadow mode operations, maintaining normal operations, no delays expected Spring 2015: Cut over – simultaneous transfer to the new ATM system in Ankara ACC and in Ankara, Istanbul, Izmir, Antalya, Dalaman, Bodrum APPs. Transfer of the upper airspace above FL235 to Ankara ACC Spring 2015 – May 2015: Transition to new system. No capacity reduction planned. No delays expected due to the transition
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 16 Released Issue
2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook
DHMI is planning sufficient capacity to cope with expected demand, and no capacity reduction linked to the transition to SMART. However, some delays and restrictions might be necessary due to the crisis situation in neighbouring states, shifting and concentrating traffic flows in some sectors of Ankara ACC.
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2015‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 231 244 258 269 288
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 227 238 252 263 280
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 227 241 254 266 284
Capacity Profile ‐ High 237 251 267 281 298
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 227 236 246 256 269
Capacity Baseline 212 227
2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 237 251 266 282 299
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
310
Cap
acity profile (movements per hour)
LTAANEW - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 17 Released Issue
Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations
Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2013 applicable to Turkey for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.
Reference number
Recommendation Ownership
REC-2013-1 (1)
Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.
DK, EE, MAS, BE, LV, MK, CZ, CY, NO, AM, PT, BA,
UA, TR, UK
State feedback: The objective will be completed by mid 2015. Action FCM01-ASP08 will be in SMART phase so date of 05/2015 is the planned completion date. The other remaining actions are ready and FSA mesages for Ankara have been tested with NM and approved. The software is not installed in accordance with sending proper FSA messages for Istanbul and Izmir. In addition the system is sending OAT rather than just GAT correlated flight data. All actions will be completed by 05/2015.
REC-2013-1 (5)
Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of SAF10 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.
BE, BG, CZ, IE, ES, AZ, BA, LV, EE, MD,
ME, MK, UA, GR, HR, HU, PT, TR, RS, SE, SI, AL
State feedback: The objective will be implemented in framework of SMART system. Full implementation will be achieved by mid-2015.
REC-2013-1 (9) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ATC02.2 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.
IT, AL, BA, NL, MT, PL, ES, CZ, GE, TR
State feedback: Implementation of this objective is almost completed. This functionality was included as part of the Interim SMART system and was operational from 09/2008. All en-route and TMA airspace is covered. STCA implementation/procedures will be audited by the DGCA when human resources permit. This is the reason of delayed implementation.
REC-2013-4 Ensure better planning reliability at local level. All States
State feedback: Turkey will ensure that dates provided in LSSIP document correspond to dates provided in Stakeholders business plans.
REC-2013-5 The ANSPs should ensure synchronised system evolution between neighbouring States.
All ECAC ANSPs
State feedback: ATM capabilities of neighbouring States are being taken into account for implementation of functionalities that depend on coordination with adjacent airspace (e.g. OLDI).
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 18 Released Issue
Chapter 4 - National Projects
The main projects currently ongoing in Turkey are depicted in the table below.
Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references
Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas *
DHMI (TR) AMAN (AMAN) AMAN is management tool to arrange the
sequence of arrivals. No extension to en-route is planned. Planned to be operational for Atatürk Airport initially
2009-2015 Ongoing ESSIP:ATC07.1
OI-Steps: TS-0102 Other: -
Capacity: More capacity in TMA.
Safety: Safety benefits. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -
ARTAS (ART) The main RDP will be ARTAS in SMART project and 3 ARTAS units will be located in Turkey.
2006-2015 Ongoing ESSIP:-
OI-Steps: - Other: -
Capacity: -
Safety: Safety benefits. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -
A-SMGCS Level I and II (SMGCS)
A-SMGCS Level II system for Antalya, Esenboga and Istanbul Ataturk.
2008-2010 Completed ESSIP:AOP04.1, AOP04.2 OI-Steps: AO-0102, AO-0201 Other: -
Capacity: Increased capacity.
Safety: Increased safety. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -
Project SMART implementation (SMART_SYS)
The SMART Project (Systematic Modernisation of ATM Resources in Turkey) brings together a number of sub projects and strategies in to one global project. A pan-Turkish ACC located near Esenboga Airport, near Ankara, The replacement or extension of the major airport APPs in Turkey (the APP of Ankara will be in the ACC Building), also part of TAMP, A Building Programme for the new ACC at Ankara, Replacement or refurbishment of the APP buildings, A new Tower (TWR) at Antalya and Istanbul-Atatürk, A state-of-the-art RDPS/FDPS/ODS System. The supply of which will be together
2006-2015 Ongoing ESSIP:ATC02.2, ATC02.5, ATC02.6, ATC02.7, ATC12, ATC17, COM09, FCM01, FCM03 OI-Steps: CM-0201, CM-0202, CM-0203, CM-0801, DCB-0302, IS-0101, IS-0102 Other: -
Capacity: The new system will enable Turkey to achieve higher capacity. Safety: The new system will positively affect safety. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Higher cost-efficiency of operations.
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 19 Released Issue
Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references
Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas *
with the new Ankara ACC Building (turnkey project). To shorten the time to the operation of the new SMART system, DHMI are planning to implement as far as possible, an off-the-shelf (OTS) system with a minimum of customisation. Additional functionalities may be added at a later date (after SMART implementation).
Radars replacement (RDR)
18 Mode S and 5 PSR Radars have been installed.
2009-2013 Completed ESSIP:-
OI-Steps: - Other: -
Capacity: Capacity gains.
Safety: Safety benefits. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 20 Released Issue
Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination
5.1 FAB Co-ordination
Turkey is not participating in any of the FAB initiatives.
5.2 Regional cooperation
5.2.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives
It is to be noted that Turkey maintains very close cooperation/co-ordination with all neighbouring states.
Turkey has taken on responsibility of some transition tasks in the area and arranging air traffic flow to / from Europe. Turkey is co-operating with neighbouring states such as Greece and Bulgaria to optimise the performance of Ground-Ground Networks and data exchange.
It is also considered that, collaborating as closely as we can with our neighbouring civil air navigation service providers has a paramount importance in order to optimise the airspace design and management and increase the regional capacity, safety and quality. Therefore, Turkey undertakes initiatives and efforts to ensure the application of same concepts, standards and projects under the EUROCONTROL framework.
The fundamental purpose of the Cooperative Airspace Initiative (CAI) is to foster cooperation between NATO members and Russian Federation on airspace surveillance and air traffic coordination with the goals of enhancing transparency, predictability and the collective capabilities to fight against terrorist air threats. Turkey is playing an essential role in this project with Local Coordination Unit (LCU), established at Esenboğa Airport.
On 16 May 2012, a Memorandum of Co-operation (MoC) was signed between DHMI and Bulgarian Air Traffic Services Authority (BULATSA) in Ankara. The MoC aimed at common understanding or adoption of ICAO, EUROCONTROL and other international requirements relevant for the ATM domain and cooperation for operational area. In the framework of this MoC, the delegations of the DHMI and BULATSA discussed the main aspects of future co-operation, such as ensuring an effective route network, common operational and technical projects, etc.
On 20 June 2012 Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE) and DHMI signed a MOU in Ukraine which aims the development of regional cooperation between UkSATSE and DHMI. It was also agreed that working groups on air traffic management, communication, navigation and surveillance, economic and financial support will further negotiate the related issues.
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 21 Released Issue
Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation
Conventions
Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’:
o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and
o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.
Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**)
State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date
REG (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement
APO. Progress (**)
APO Impl. Date
ASP (By:mm-yyyy) ASP high level progress statement
ASP. Progress (**)
ASP Impl. Date
MIL (By:mm-yyyy) MIL high level progress statement
MIL. Progress (**)
MIL Impl. Date
APO (By:mm-yyyy) APO high level progress statement
APO. Progress (**)
APO Impl. Date
(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:
ECAC Completed No Plan
EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable
Multi-N Planned Missing Data
APT Late
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 22 Released Issue
6.1 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress
AOM13.1
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
[IDP]
No Plan
The Military cannot implement this objective completely until appropriate legislation is passed. Meantime mature and robust procedures are already in force regarding the handling and interface of OAT/GAT operations
‐
REG (By:12/2018) No current plan until appropriate legislation is passed.
No Plan
‐
ASP (By:12/2018)
No current plan until appropriate legislation is passed. Implementation of the objective will take place in parallel with the military
No Plan
‐
MIL (By:12/2018)
The Military cannot implement this objective completely until appropriate legislation is passed. Meantime mature and robust procedures are already in force regarding the handling and interface of OAT/GAT operations
Not Applicable
‐
AOM19
Implement Advanced Airspace Management
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
[IDP]
No Plan
This objective will be evaluated and implemented by the 2015 completion date. However, for this LSSIP cycle resources will not be available.
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2016)
This objective will be evaluated and implemented by the 2015 completion date. However, for this LSSIP cycle resources will not be available.
No Plan
31/12/2015
AOM21
Implementation of Free Route Airspace
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
[IDP]
Planned
Implementation of free route airspace is planned for 2016‐ 2018 period. 31/12/2016
ASP (By:12/2017) Implementation of free route airspace is planned for 2016‐ 2018 period.
Planned
31/12/2016
AOP03
Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/04/2003 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013
[IDP]
Completed
Local Runway Safety Teams (which report to the DHMI ATM Safety Commission) have been set up at all airports and a reporting procedure and dissemination structure is in place. All reports are sent to DHMI HQ and DGCA, but administrative procedures still preclude transfer of same to EUROCONTROL. Ab‐initio and recurrent training in line with EAPPRI guidelines is ongoing. TWR Staff are kept fully aware of all runway incursion matters. Assessment of correct use of the standard ICAO phraseology and read‐back procedures is performed regularly. Investigation related findings are suitably debriefed. All Aerodromes are regularly checked for compliance with ICAO Annex 14.
‐
REG (By:12/2013)
The DGCA oversees the implementation of EAPPRI 2.0 requirements at airports and audits procedures on a regular basis at major and other randomly selected airports. All reports are sent to DHMI HQ and DGCA, but administrative procedures still preclude transfer of same to EUROCONTROL. .
Completed
‐
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 23 Released Issue
ASP (By:12/2013)
Local Runway Safety Teams (which report to the DHMI ATM Safety Commission) have been set up at all airports and a reporting procedure and dissemination structure is in place. All reports are sent to DHMI HQ and DGCA, but administrative procedures still preclude transfer of same to EUROCONTROL. Ab‐initio and recurrent training in line with EAPPRI guidelines is ongoing. TWR Staff are kept fully aware of all runway incursion matters. Assessment of correct use of the standard ICAO phraseology and read‐back procedures is performed regularly. Investigation related findings are suitably debriefed. All airports are regularly checked for compliance with ICAO Annex 14.
For the military, the Turkish Airforce has adopted the EAPPRI 2.0 as a basis for training and operational procedures in particular at military airports that are available for civil use. All reports involving civil aircraft are sent to DHMI HQ and the DGCA. ATC personnel are kept aware of all runway incursion matters. TWR Staff are kept fully aware of all runway incursion matters. Assessment of correct use of the standard ICAO phraseology and read‐back procedures is performed regularly. Investigation related findings are suitably debriefed. All Aerodromes are regularly checked for compliance with ICAO Annex 14; however, joint user airports may have signs and markings conforming to NATO standards.
Completed
‐
APO (By:12/2013)
Local Runway Safety Teams (which report to the DHMI ATM Safety Commission) have been set up at all airports and a reporting procedure and dissemination structure is in place. All reports are sent to DHMI HQ and DGCA, but administrative procedures still preclude transfer of same to EUROCONTROL. Ab‐initio and recurrent training in line with EAPPRI guidelines is ongoing. TWR Staff are kept fully aware of all runway incursion matters. Assessment of correct use of the standard ICAO phraseology and read‐back procedures is performed regularly. Investigation related findings are suitably debriefed. All airports are regularly checked for compliance with ICAO Annex 14.
For the military, the Turkish Airforce has adopted the EAPPRI 2.0 as a basis for training and operational procedures in particular at military airports that are available for civil use. All reports involving civil aircraft are sent to DHMI HQ and the DGCA. ATC personnel are kept aware of all runway incursion matters. TWR Staff are kept fully aware of all runway incursion matters. Assessment of correct use of the standard ICAO phraseology and read‐back procedures is performed regularly. Investigation related findings are suitably debriefed. All Aerodromes are regularly checked for compliance with ICAO Annex 14; however, joint user airports may have signs and markings conforming to NATO standards.
Completed
‐
AOP04.1
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
Completed
LTAC - Ankara
Ankara implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
REG (By:12/2010) No plan to implement. Not applicable in TR.
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2011) Ankara implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010.
Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2010) Drivers have received instruction on the system.
Completed
30/06/2010
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 24 Released Issue
AOP04.1
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
Completed
LTAI - Antalya
Antalya implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
REG (By:12/2010) Not applicable in TR.
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2011)
Antalya implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. All training and development of procedures has been completed.
Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2010) Drivers have received instruction on the system
Completed
30/06/2010
AOP04.1
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
Completed
LTBA - Istanbul
Istanbul implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
REG (By:12/2010) Not applicable in TR.
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2011)
Istanbul implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. All training and development of procedures has been completed.
Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2010) Drivers have received instruction on the system.
Completed
30/06/2010
AOP04.2
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
Completed
LTAC - Ankara
Ankara implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
ASP (By:12/2017) Ankara implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010.
Completed
30/06/2020
APO (By:12/2017) Drivers have received instruction on the system.
Completed
30/06/2010
AOP04.2
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
Completed
LTAI - Antalya
Antalya implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
ASP (By:12/2017) Antalya implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010.
Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2017) Drivers have received instruction on the system.
Completed
30/06/2010
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 25 Released Issue
AOP04.2
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
Completed
LTBA - Istanbul
Istanbul implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
ASP (By:12/2017) Istanbul implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010.
Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2017) Drivers have received instruction on the system.
Completed
30/06/2010
AOP05
Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/01/2016
[IDP]
Planned
LTAI - Antalya
A draft MoU has been circulated to key stakeholders. Following the developments of Istanbul CDM studies, studies for Antalya will be focused.
31/12/2015
ASP (By:01/2016)
DHMI has initiated action to implement this objective. A draft MoU has been developed and circulated to key stakeholders.
Planned
31/12/2015
APO (By:01/2016)
DHMI has initiated action to implement this objective. A draft MoU has been developed and circulated to key stakeholders
Planned
31/12/2015
AOP05
Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/01/2016
[IDP]
Partly Completed
LTBA - Istanbul
A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have been formed. CDM platform has been established and tests are going on.
31/10/2015
ASP (By:01/2016)
A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have been formed. CDM platform has been established and tests are going on.
Partly Completed
31/10/2015
APO (By:01/2016)
A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have been formed. CDM platform has been established and tests are going on.
Partly Completed
31/10/2015
ATC02.2
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013
Late
Is a functionality included as part of the Interim SMART system and was operational from 09/2008. All en‐route and TMA airspace is covered. STCA implementation/procedures will be audited by the DGCA when human resources permit.
31/05/2015
ASP (By:01/2013)
STCA is a functionality included as part of the Interim SMART system. The STCA is in accordance with EUROCONTROL specifications.
Late
31/05/2015
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 26 Released Issue
ATC02.5
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐ level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Planned
APW level 2 will be implemented with the SMART system which is planned for 05/2015 31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2016) APW will be implemented with the SMART system.
Planned
31/05/2015
ATC02.6
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Planned
MSAW will be implemented with the SMART system. 31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2016) MSAW will be implemented with the SMART system.
Planned
31/05/2015
ATC02.7
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Planned
APM, in line with EUROCONTROL specifications, will be implemented at Istanbul, Esenboga, Antalya, Dalaman, Bodrum and Izmir airports in parallel with SMART.
Military units have APM functionality but due to the dynamic nature of OAT operations this functionality is only enabled at airports that serve GAT.
31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2016)
APM will be implemented in parallel with SMART at Istanbul, Esenboga, Antalya, Dalaman, Bodrum and Izmir airports.
Military units have APM functionality but due to the dynamic nature of OAT operations this functionality is only enabled at airports that serve GAT.
Planned
31/05/2015
ATC07.1
Implement arrival management tools
(Outside Applicability Area)
Timescales:
‐ not applicable ‐
Planned
Tender and acceptance of AMAN has already been done for Atatürk and S.Gölçen Airports. AMAN will be operational at second quarter 2015 due to late acceptance procedures for SMART systems.
31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2015)
Tender and acceptance of AMAN has already been done for Atatürk and S.Gölçen Airports. AMAN will be operational at second quarter 2015 due to late acceptance procedures for SMART systems. Preparation of technical aspects for Antalya Airport AMAN has been finalised and tender will be realized at first quarter of 2015.
Planned
31/05/2015
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 27 Released Issue
ATC12
Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Planned
Formal collaboration with EUROCONTROL commenced in February 2009. Phase 1 is completed and Phase 2 was agreed with a planned timescale of November 2009 to July 2010 and includes documenting the working methods, assessing the accuracy of the TP, developing the local operational concept for using FASTI tools and reviewing the requirements for TP/MTCD.
31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2016)
Phase 1 completed. Phase 2 commenced in November 2009 and due for completion in July 2010. Phase 2 includes documenting the working methods, assessing the accuracy of the TP, developing the local operational concept for using FASTI tools and reviewing the requirements for TP/MTCD.
Planned
31/05/2015
ATC15
Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
[IDP]
Planned
The implementation of AMAN is planned for Istanbul Atatürk and S.Gökçen Airports. Adjacent ACC sectors within SMART project have been equiped with AMAN supporting systems, including monitors and sofware.
31/01/2017
ASP (By:12/2017)
The implementation of AMAN is planned for Istanbul Atatürk and S.Gökçen Airports. We have already arranged close cooperation with BULATSA on AMAN implementation.
Planned
30/06/2015
ATC16
Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
Partly Completed
The training plan for ACAS II version 7.1 has been developed.ATC units have been monitoring the performance of ACAS. Certain type of the military transport aircraft have been equipped with ACAS.
31/01/2015
REG (By:12/2015) Necessary actions will be taken before 2015.
Planned
31/01/2015
ASP (By:03/2012)
The training plan for ACAS II version 7.1 has been developed.ATC units have been monitoring the performance of ACAS.
Completed
31/03/2012
MIL (By:12/2015)
Certain type of the transport aircraft have been equipped with ACAS. The training has been completed.
Partly Completed
31/01/2015
ATC17
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
[IDP]
Planned
All functions will be in use with SMART project. 31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2018) All functions will be in use with SMART project.
Planned
31/05/2015
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 28 Released Issue
COM09
Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP)
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2006 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014
[IDP]
Completed
Turkey has no X.25 connection. Radar and voice connections are using TDM point to point connection. AFTN/CIDIN/AMHS and other ground data connections are already using IP based connections.
31/12/2008
ASP (By:12/2014)
Turkey has no X.25 connection. Radar and voice connections are using TDM point to point connection. AFTN/CIDIN/AMHS and other ground data connections are already using IP based connections.
Completed
31/12/2008
COM10
Migrate from AFTN to AMHS
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014
Completed
The AMHS/AFTN/CIDIN system is active now. The existing system is making data exchange. There is no need to Implement gateway between national non‐AMHS network (other than AFTN) and AMHS at the moment.
Military have their own communication network for OAT message purposes. The system is fully interoperable with the ANSP.
31/12/2014
ASP (By:12/2014)
The AMHS/AFTN/CIDIN system is active now. The existing system is making data exchange. There is no need to Implement gateway between national non‐AMHS network (other than AFTN) and AMHS at the moment.
Military have their own communication network for OAT message purposes. The system is fully interoperable with the ANSP.
AMHS
Completed
31/12/2014
COM11
Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
Planned
In SMART Project Turkey is implementing VoIP based network. 31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2020) In SMART Project Turkey is implementing VoIP based network.
Planned
31/05/2015
ENV01
Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013
[IDP]
Late
LTAI - Antalya
An initial CDA workshop meeting was given by EUROCONTROL. There is no final date for this to be implemented but DHMI will implement CDA in the medium term future.
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2013) DHMI will implement CDA approaches in the medium term.
Late
31/12/2015
APO (By:12/2013) DHMI will implement CDA approaches in the medium term.
Late
31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 29 Released Issue
ENV01
Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013
[IDP]
Late
LTBA - Istanbul
An initial CDA workshop meeting was given by EUROCONTROL. There is no final date for this to be implemented but DHMI will implement CDA in the medium term future.
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2013) DHMI will implement CDA approaches in the medium term.
Late
31/12/2015
APO (By:12/2013) DHMI will implement CDA approaches in the medium term.
Late
31/12/2015
ENV02
Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Partly Completed
LTAI - Antalya
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. There is legislation regarding maximum noise levels generated by aircraft but no system of enforcement/punitive measures has been developed as yet. Local traffic regulations have been developed in coordination with airport and airline operators in 2014 and will be implemented at first half of 2015.
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2016)
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.
Partly Completed
31/12/2015
APO (By:12/2016)
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.
Partly Completed
31/12/2015
ENV02
Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Completed
LTBA - Istanbul
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. There is legislation regarding maximum noise levels generated by aircraft but no system of enforcement/punitive measures has been developed as yet.
31/12/2014
ASP (By:12/2016)
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.
Completed
31/12/2014
APO (By:12/2016)
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.
Completed
31/12/2014
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 30 Released Issue
FCM01
Implement enhanced tactical flow management services
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006
Late
Some system modifications are still required and the date of 05/2015 is the planned completion date for all objectives.
31/05/2015
ASP (By:07/2014)
Objective FCM01‐ASP08 will be in SMART phase so date of 05/2015 is the planned completion date. The other remaining objectives are ready and FSA mesages for Ankara have been tested with CFMU and approved. The software is not installed in accordance with sending proper FSA messages for Istanbul and Izmir . In addition the system is sending OAT rather than just GAT correlated flight data. All objectives will be completed by 05/2015
Late
31/05/2015
FCM03
Implement collaborative flight planning
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
[IDP]
Planned
The Interim SMART system is capable of compliance with all SLoAs other than ASP09. The other remaining objectives are theoretically ready but closed and not tested because of the new AFTN system is recently in force and some other requires extra SW due to military needs.
31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2015)
The Interim SMART system is capable of compliance with all SLoAs other than ASP09. The other remaining objectives are theoretically ready but closed and not tested because of the new AFTN system is recently in force and some other requires extra SW due to military needs.
Planned
31/05/2015
FCM04
Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1
(Outside Applicability Area)
Timescales:
‐ not applicable ‐
[IDP]
Not Applicable
TR is not in the applicability area. ‐
ASP (By:12/2015) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
FCM05
Implementation of interactive rolling NOP
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
[IDP]
No Plan
The decision to implementation of interactive rolling NOP has not been taken yet. ‐
ASP (By:12/2016) No plan
No Plan
‐
APO (By:12/2016) No plan
No Plan
‐
INF04
Implement integrated briefing
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012
Completed
All infrastructure ready for full implementation in 07/2010. 31/07/2010
ASP (By:12/2012) All infrastructure ready for full implementation in 07/2010.
Completed
31/07/2010
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 31 Released Issue
INF07
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD)
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018
Planned
The processes are going on in accordance with national TOD implementation program. Necessary actions will be achieved in coordination with stakeholders.
31/05/2018
REG (By:05/2018) Necessary actions will be achieved in coordinaton with stakeholders.
Planned
31/05/2018
ASP (By:05/2018)
The processes are going on in accordance with national TOD implementation program.
Planned
31/05/2018
APO (By:05/2018)
The processes are going on in accordance with national TOD implementation program.
Planned
31/05/2018
ITY‐ACID
Aircraft identification
(Outside Applicability Area)
Timescales:
‐ not applicable ‐
Not Applicable
Turkey is not within applicability area of this objective. ‐
ASP (By:01/2020) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐ADQ
Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information
(Outside Applicability Area)
Timescales:
‐ not applicable ‐
Not Applicable
Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ‐
REG (By:06/2017) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:06/2017) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:06/2017) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐AGDL
Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285
(Outside Applicability Area)
Timescales:
‐ not applicable ‐
[IDP]
Not Applicable
Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ‐
REG (By:02/2016) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:02/2016) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
MIL (By:01/2014) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 32 Released Issue
ITY‐AGVCS2
Implement air‐ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195
(Outside Applicability Area)
Timescales:
‐ not applicable ‐
Not Applicable
TR is not in the applicability area. ‐
REG (By:12/2018) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2018) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
MIL (By:12/2020) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2018) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐COTR
Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes
(Outside Applicability Area)
Timescales:
‐ not applicable ‐
Not Applicable
Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ‐
ASP (By:02/2016) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
MIL (By:12/2012) ‐
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐FMTP
Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP)
Timescales:
Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014
[IDP]
Late
The common flight message transfer protocol will be introduced with the SMART system. 31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2014)
The common flight message transfer protocol will be introduced with the SMART system.
Late
31/05/2015
MIL (By:12/2014)
Military has its own network between military sites and there is no plan to upgrade this system. The interface between military/civil sites will be completed once the SMART system is operational.
Late
31/05/2015
ITY‐SPI
Surveillance performance and interoperability
(Outside Applicability Area)
Timescales:
‐ not applicable ‐
Not Applicable
Turkey is not an EU+ State. ‐
REG (By:02/2015) Turkey is not EU+ State.
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:02/2015) Turkey is not EU+ State.
Not Applicable
‐
MIL (By:06/2020) Turkey is not EU+ State.
Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 33 Released Issue
NAV03
Implementation of P‐RNAV
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012
Completed
P‐RNAV SIDs and STARS have been implemented at Istanbul and Antalya. Implementation at other airports will continue in due course.
30/11/2010
ASP (By:12/2012)
P‐RNAV SIDs and STARS have been implemented at Istanbul and Antalya. Implementation at other airports will continue in due course.
Completed
30/11/2010
NAV10
Implement APV procedures
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
[IDP]
Planned
Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO ‐VNAV operations has been published. APV BARO‐VNAV procedures are planned.
31/12/2015
REG (By:04/2016)
Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO ‐VNAV operations has been published. APV BARO‐VNAV procedures are planned.
Planned
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2016)
Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO ‐VNAV operations has been published. APV BARO‐VNAV procedures are planned.
Planned
31/12/2015
SAF10
Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/06/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
Late
Planned for implementation with SMART system by 05/2015. 31/05/2015
REG (By:12/2011) Planned for implementation with SMART system by 05/2015.
Late
31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2011) Planned for implementation with SMART system by 05/2015.
Late
31/05/2015
MIL (By:12/2011) No intention to implement. Not applicable to MIL.
Not Applicable
‐
SAF11
Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018
Planned
Local runway safety teams have been established for each aerodromes. These teams will be responsible for runway excursions.
31/12/2015
REG (By:01/2018)
Necessary actions are planned in accordance with the implementation date.
Planned
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2014)
Local runway safety teams have been established for each aerodromes. These teams will be responsible for runway excursions.
Late
31/12/2015
APO (By:12/2014)
Local runway safety teams have been established for each aerodromes. These teams will be responsible for runway excursions.
Late
31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 34 Released Issue
SRC‐RLMK
Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs)
Timescales:
Entry into force of ESARR 3: 01/07/2000 Entry into force of ESARR 2: 01/11/2000 Entry into force of ESARR 4: 01/04/2001 Entry into force of ESARR 5: 01/04/2002 Entry into force of ESARR 6: 01/11/2003 Entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 550/2004: 20/04/2004 Entry into force of ESARR 1: 01/11/2004 Entry into force of Commission regulation (EC) No 1315/2007 repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011: 09/11/2007 Objective Implementation completion date: 31/12/2010
Completed
ESARR1( SHY‐GOZETIM), ESARR 2 (SHY6502), ESARR3 (SHT 65‐03), ESARR 4 (SHT 65‐04) ESARR 5 (SHY6501) and ESARR 6 (SHY 6) have been enacted.
30/06/2011
REG (By:12/2010)
ESARR1( SHY‐GOZETIM), ESARR 2 (SHY6502), ESARR3 (SHT 65‐03), ESARR 4 (SHT 65‐04) ESARR 5 (SHY6501) and ESARR 6 (SHY 6) have been enacted.
Completed
30/06/2011
SRC‐SLRD
Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies
Timescales:
Entry into force of ESARR1: 01/11/2004 Entry into force of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1315/2007 repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011: 09/11/2007 Objective Implementation completion date: 31/12/2010
Completed
Turkey has adopted the ECAC TLS but will review this in time in order to ensure its validity. The DGCA supports a just culture environment and mechanisms are in place to ensure incidents are both reported and investigated. A process to monitor achieved levels of safety has yet to be implemented. An annual Safety Oversight Report is published and ESARR 1 is enacted.
31/12/2013
REG (By:12/2010)
The DGCA supports a just culture environment and mechanisms are in place to ensure incidents are both reported and investigated.
The military has a mature system to monitor safety levels and resolve deficiencies. The DGCA is informed and involved regarding any incident involving GAT.
Completed
31/12/2013
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 35 Released Issue
6.1 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress
Note that the above picture is based on the Preliminary Deployment Programme V0, published in December 2014 by the Deployment Manager. The full Deployment Programme is foreseen by end June 2015.
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 36 Released Issue
Annexes
Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process
LSSIP Co-ordination
LSSIP Focal Point for Turkey DHMI Cihan Sahin
LSSIP Contact Person for Turkey EUROCONTROL Predrag Vranjkovic
ESSIP Objective Implementation
ESSIP Objective
EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator
National Stakeholder Specialist(s)
AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI (E. REUBER till 02/2015)
A. DYBOWSKA
AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA
AOM21 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA
AOP03 T. LICU P. VRANJKOVIC
AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC
AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC
AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC
ATC02.2 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT
ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT
ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT
ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT
ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO
ATC12 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO
ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO
ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL’ORTO
ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO
COM09 L. POPESCU O. ALFARO
COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA
COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA
ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL
ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL
FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA
FCM03 S. SMIDT O. CIOARA
FCM04 M. RICHARD O. CIOARA
FCM05 P. MATERN O. CIOARA
INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO
INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 37 Released Issue
ESSIP Objective
EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator
National Stakeholder Specialist(s)
ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA
ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO
ITY-AGDL S. DISSING A. KOKONA
ITY-AGVCS2 J. POUZET O. ALFARO
ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO
ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO
ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA
NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA
NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA
SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT
SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT
SRC-RLMK M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA
SRC-SLRD M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 38 Released Issue
Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts
1. DHMI Organisational chart
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 39 Released Issue
2. DGCA Organisational chart
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 40 Released Issue
Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations
ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance System
ACC Area Control Centre
AF ATM Functionality
AIS Aeronautical Information Services
AMC Acceptable means of Compliance
ANS Air Navigation Services
ANSP ANS Provider
AOP Airports Operations (Domain)
APV Approach with Vertical Guidance
ARN ATS Route Network
ATC Air Traffic Control
ATCO Air Traffic Controller
ATFM Air Traffic Flow Management
ATM Air Traffic Management
ATS Air Traffic Services
CAD Civil Aviation Department
CDM Collaborative Decision Making
CEATS Central European Air Traffic Services
CFMU Central Flow Management Unit
CNS Communications, Navigation and Surveillance
COM Communications
CTR Control Zone
DFL Division Flight Level
EAD European AIS Database
eAIP European Aeronautical Information Publication
EATM European Air Traffic Management
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 41 Released Issue
ECAC European Civil Aviation Conference
ESARR EUROCONTROL Safety Regulation Requirement
ESP European Safety Programme
FDP Flight Data Processing
FT Fast Track
FIR Flight Information Region
FL Flight Level
FSQA Flight Safety and Quality Assurance
FUA Flexible Use of Airspace
GBAS Ground Based Augmentation System
GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System
HRS Human Resources
HUM Human (Domain)
ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation
IFPS Initial Flight-plan Processing System
IFR Instrument Flight Rules
ISO International Standards Organisation
JAA Joint Aviation Authorities
kHz Kilohertz
LoA Letters of Agreement
MIL Military
NAV Navigation
NM Nautical Mile
NOTAM Notice To Airmen
OLDI On Line Data Interchange
OPS Operations
PCP Pilot Common Project
PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme
PSR Primary Surveillance Radar
QMS Quality Management System
REG Regulatory Authorities
LSSIP Year 2014 Turkey 42 Released Issue
RNP Required Navigation Performance
RVSM Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum
S-AF Sub ATM Functionality
SAN Sakaeronavigatsia Ltd (ATM of Georgia)
SBAS Satellite-Based augmentation systems (SBAS)
SLOA Stakeholder Line of Action
SMQS Safety Management and Quality System
SMS Safety Management System
SRC Safety Regulation Commission
SSR Secondary Surveillance Radar
STCA Short Term Conflict Alert
SUR Surveillance (Domain)
TAV Tepe Akfen Urben
TMA Terminal Manoeuvring Area; Terminal Control Area