kaust digital communication ee – 242

17
Prepared by: Ahmad Dehwah & Emad Al- Hemyari 1

Upload: nemo

Post on 11-Jan-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

KAUST Digital Communication EE – 242. Outage Models. Prepared by: Ahmad Dehwah & Emad Al- Hemyari. Outline:. Introduction. Approaches of analyzing the outage. Motivation and previous work System Model. Conclusion. References. Q & A. Definition. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

Prepared by: Ahmad Dehwah & Emad Al-Hemyari 1

Page 2: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

Introduction. Approaches of analyzing the outage. Motivation and previous work System Model. Conclusion. References. Q & A.

2

Page 3: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

Outage models are applied in wireless communication systems, which are subjected to ◦ fading ◦ and other interfering signalsto predict their performance. The performance of a given system is considered to be unacceptable when the Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio (SINR) is below a given threshold. i.e,

SINR<z0

3

Page 4: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

Different analysis ways to approach this problem can be followed depending on the way an outage model is defined: 

The simplest definition introduced before: SINR<z0

Interference-limited model: SIRSignal power < defined power protection ratio

neglecting the receiver background noise and the thermal noise Noise-Limited model: where noise is treated as co-channel

interference. Signal power< the powers of (total interference + noise) by

power protection margins Minimum Signal Power Constraint:

signal power< total interference power by a protection ratio andSignal power<minimum power level in the presence of thermal noise.

4

Page 5: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

Such reliability study of outage is conducted in terms of error probability given that the SINR is above the given threshold.

Pr(Error|SINR>z0)

5

Page 6: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

The motivation behind this study of outage models:

No closed form expression of the probability of outage for a sum of K multiple interfering signals with different powers of the same distribution.

Previous work either considered limited number of interferers or numerical approximations.

Different communication systems require different conditions on the definition of the outage to achieve certain reliability.

Performance analysis of BPSK system through a Rayleigh fading channel is conducted in terms of

Pr(Error|SINR>z0)rather than just studying the probability of outage.

6

Page 7: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

7

Page 8: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

The signal at the receiver front is of the following form:

Where ◦ Sk(t): is the kth interfering signal (k=0, 1, …, K).◦ n(t): is a Gaussian noise of two sided power

spectral density N0/Tb.◦ τ: is a uniform time offset of S(t) over [0,2π].

8

Page 9: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

There are three combinations to consider the SINR components according to our system model.

-Signal -Interference - Noise

◦ Each of these parameters can be either deterministic or random.

Signal Random Random Random

Interference

constant Random Random

Noise constant constant Random

9

Page 10: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

The kth interfering signal (k=0, 1, …., K) is:

Where Sk: is the average received power Xk: is the Rayliegh fading level of the kth signal

with . φk: is uniform over [0,2π] and φ0=0. Xk and φk are mutually independent random

variables Ψ(t): is the shaping waveform

10

Page 11: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

Now the decision variable at the output of the correlator is given by:

Where η: is Gaussian Random variable with variance . Ik: is the multiple access interference component

due to the kth signal given by:

11

Page 12: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

12

Page 13: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

13

Page 14: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

14

Page 15: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

15

Page 16: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

Q & A

16

Page 17: KAUST Digital Communication  EE – 242

1. A. Annamalai, C. Tellambura, and V. K. Bhargava, .Simple and accurate methods for outage analysis in cellular mobile radio systems-a uni_ed approach,. IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 49, pp. 303-316, Feb. 2001.

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=905889  2. D. Dardari, V. Tralli, and R. Verdone, .On the capacity of slotted Aloha with

Rayleigh fading: the role played by the number of interferers,. IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 4, pp. 155-157, May 2000.

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=846496  3. K. A. Hamdi, . Exact probability of error of BPSK communication links subjected

to asynchronous interference in Rayleigh fading environment,. IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 50, pp. 1577 - 1579, Oct. 2002

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1044597 4. K. A. Hamdi, On the reliability of outage modelshttp://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=18184207

17