introducing social catalogues and social software into public libraries
DESCRIPTION
This is a presentation that was given at Dalhousie University's School of Information Management. It was presented to the first year students enrolled in the Knowledge Organization class.TRANSCRIPT
Introducing Social Introducing Social Catalogues and Social Catalogues and Social Software into Public Software into Public Libraries Libraries
Laurel TarulliCollection Access Librarian
Halifax Public LibrariesDecember 7, 2009
Exploring the world Exploring the world around usaround usWeb 2.0 User Expectations – Amazon and
Google vs. The Public Library Catalogue
New technologies – *Social interactions and sharing◦RSS feeds, LibraryThing, Facebook,
Twitter Younger, energetic staff with new
ideas about “the library”
The Library Catalogue – Basic The Library Catalogue – Basic HomepageHomepage
Google – It isn’t just about a single search Google – It isn’t just about a single search box, it’s about personalizing your information box, it’s about personalizing your information needsneeds
Amazon.caAmazon.ca
We’re not Amazon or We’re not Amazon or GoogleGoogleNo, we’re not, but what are they doing right?
◦ Recommended reads◦ Ranked results◦ Single search box – pulling all resources together
and letting you “drill down”◦ Easy to use – no training required!
There’s a fear in exploring this:◦ Exposing our weaknesses◦ It’s too expensive to “fix” our current model◦ We don’t have the expertise or resources◦ It demands too much effort – status quo◦ There’s an education component involved
Skills Staff buy-in Focus groups/research
Baby StepsBaby StepsStep-by-step introduction of new
technologies and ideas◦Non-threatening
Job security Fear of technology Fear of change
◦Explaining and showing the benefits◦Fun
Time to play Getting used to the technology and ideas
Halifax Public LibrariesHalifax Public LibrariesIntroducing 2.0 technologies into
cataloguing◦Cataloguing Wiki
Created in late 2007 Resistance/Staff buy-in
◦Staff Side Collective body of cataloguing knowledge
within the department
◦Catawiki “Public” staff side of Catawiki
New Technologies New Technologies throughout HPLthroughout HPLReference blog
Readers’ blog◦ Active Readers’ Advisory Team and RA
movement at HPL
How can we merge our expertise into one source to help our users and enhance our services?
◦ We need to look at what we currently have and what users and staff want
Legacy Library CataloguesLegacy Library Catalogues
Online Catalogues: What Online Catalogues: What Users and Librarians WantUsers and Librarians Want
Users – “Seamless discovery through delivery”
Delivery is more important than discoveryWhere is it? Is it available? Format? How soon can I have it?
Simple search box with option for advanced searching
Easier access to online content and links
Online Catalogues: What Online Catalogues: What Users and Librarians WantUsers and Librarians Want
First attempts to “socialize” First attempts to “socialize” the library cataloguethe library catalogue
Adding enriched content on your ownSummariesTables of contentsAdditional general notes (500s field)ReviewsRSS FeedsRecommended titlesEmbedded live reference/RA chat in the catalogue
Edmonton Public Library http://www.epl.ca David Lee King’s post: Fun with Meebo Widget and the
Library Catalogue http://davidleeking.com/2007/11/30/fun-with-our-meebo-widget-and-the-library-catalog/
Partnering with teams within the library◦ Collection Access and Readers’ Services
◦ Halifax Public Libraries Personalized summaries created by the RST that address
appeals and read-a-likes Embedded reading lists Reading suggestions found within bibliographic records Local genre headings/access points Linking bibs to relevant Readers blog posts and relevant
blog posts to the library catalogue Invites readers’ comments and interaction, event
suggestions
Social Catalogues or Next Social Catalogues or Next Generation CataloguesGeneration Catalogues
Features Single sign on
Federated search interface
Expanded scope Discovery and display of all types of content in the collection and beyond
Allows for easier customization and additional software options and enhancements
Ranked results
User intuitive interfaces Did you mean? Feature No dead ends Search suggestions
HPL Decides on HPL Decides on AquaBrowserAquaBrowser
◦Early 2009 AquaBrowser was purchased
◦May through September Implementation Process
Bibliographic record “clean-up” Faceted navigation rankings Display content Icon creation Format layouts Exporting of records
HPL Decides on AquaBrowserHPL Decides on AquaBrowser
◦October – our first glimpse of HPL’s overlay Review, editing, critiquing Formed a Social Cataloguing group from key
staff members at HPL Updates to Management Team
◦November Reviewing, critiquing Updates to Management Team Ongoing Feedback from Management Communications and Marketing gets involved
HPL Decides on AquaBrowserHPL Decides on AquaBrowserDecember - beta
◦ Staff launch◦ Staff training
January – beta◦ Public launch◦ Research and evaluation of AquaBrowser
begins
February◦ Full public and staff launch◦ Research and evaluation of AquaBrowser
continues for 2010 and beyond?
So, what does it look like?So, what does it look like?
This is what it looks like “out of the box”
After customization...After customization...
My Discoveries AccountAllows you to view your reading listsTags you’ve createdRatings and Reviews
Searching another userSearching another user
Controversies with user Controversies with user taggingtaggingThose opposed say:Tags corrupt the MARC dataAbuse Drain on resources to monitor or
“clean” user-generated materialsNo quality control/uniformityTags aren’t meaningful
◦“Favourites” “To Read” “Research”◦Sarah Palin’s new book
User tag “I can see Russia”
AquaBrowserAquaBrowserTag base has been pulled in from
LibraryThingTags reflect community – they
personalize the library catalogueUser-generated information is
another layer on top of MARC, it is not part of our MARC records
Language control◦“Black list” of terms
Follow-up thoughtsFollow-up thoughtsUser-generated information,
including tags assist in make library catalogues social discovery communities, rather than static item inventories.
◦Reflect different languages, opinions and regional needs/cultures
◦Can be personalized or social/community focussed
◦Reflect new language and trends not yet found in controlled vocabularies
Thank you!Thank you!Laurel TarulliCollection Access LibrarianHalifax Public Libraries(902)[email protected]
The Cataloguing Librarian Bloghttp://laureltarulli.wordpress.com