inspection data summary report prototype · inspection data summary report prototype this is a...
TRANSCRIPT
Inspection Data Summary Report Prototype
This is a prototype of Ofsted's primary Inspection Data
Summary Report (IDSR). This will replace the previous
inspection dashboard. It shows the proposed layout and
content of the new IDSR. The data used is example data and
illustrative only.
The 2017 primary IDSR will be released in Analyse School
Performance in late October/early November.
Floor Coasting
Reading progress -1.1 (-5) (-2.5)
Writing progress 1.8 (-7) (-3.5)
Maths progress 2.5 (-5) (-2.5)
Below floor standards in 2017? No
School coasting as of (date) 2017? No
Coasting elements 2015 2016 2017
Example school URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Areas to investigate
Expected + Reading,
writing and mathematics71% (65%) (85%)
KS2 Reading progress for pupils with low prior attainment was significantly below average in 2017. All of these pupils had special educational needs. Low prior attainers have been in the bottom quintile for reading progress for the last three years.
KS2 middle prior attainers have been in the top quintile for mathematics progress for the last three years.
Phonics: for the last three years the percentage of pupils reaching the expected standard in Year 1 and by the end of Year 2 wasbelow national for all and disadvantaged pupils.
EYFS: for the last three years the percentage of pupils reaching the expected standard in mathematics, reading and writing was below the national.
EYFS: for the last three years the percentage of pupils reaching a good level of development has been below the national.
A school will be identified as coasting if its
performance falls below the definition for three consecutive years (see elements below).
To be above the floor, the school needs to meet
either the attainment or all of the progress element.
For coasting element year definitions see here.
School level trends
Bottom
20%
Top
20%
2015 2016 2017 Q5 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
% girls
School 48 47 47
National 49 49 49
% of pupils known to be eligible for FSM
School 44 44 43
National 27 26 25
% of pupils first language not/believed not to be English
School 62 59 59
National 19 20 20
% of pupils with SEN support
School - 24.3 20.6
National - 13.0 12.1
% of pupils with a SEN statement or EHC plan
School - 2.5 2.1
National - 1.4 1.3
% stability
School 81 81 84
National 86 86 86
School deprivation indicator
School 0.5 0.5 0.3
National 0.2 0.2 0.2
Example school
This school has 19 of the 20 ethnic groups. Those with 5% or
more of the cohort are shown in the pie chart below.
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Whole school context in 2017
2017 Quintile
Ethnicity
Any other White background,
32%
Black African, 17%Black Caribbean, 10%
any other mixed background, 9%
Any other ethnic group, 7%
White Brtish, 7%
Other, 18%
Phase of education: Primary Local authority: Bristol
Headteacher: Julie Smith Admissions policy: non selective
Pupils: 425 Ages: 4 - 11
Gender: Mixed Denomination: NA
Special needs provision: Visual impairment
Year group data% girls Nat % FSM Nat % EAL Nat % SEN Nat
Year 1 62 56 50 33 25 59 20 33 15 -
Year 2 51 41 50 43 25 55 19 28 14 -
Year 3 47 41 50 29 26 57 20 16 14 -
Year 4 60 52 50 47 25 62 19 20 14 -
Year 5 57 48 50 53 26 56 19 20 14 -
Year 6 51 43 50 60 26 62 19 23 15 1
Prior attainment
0
11.7
6.1
1.7
5.7
Reading Mathematics
Underlined once: more than one standard deviation from nationalUnderlined twice: more than two standard deviations from national
0
Year group context in 2017
Example school URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Number on
roll
Writing
Difference from national (early learning goals) %
Number
of CLA
-0.7
-0.5
0.2
0.1
-0.6
-1.1
Year 6
Year 5
Year 4
Year 3
Year 2
Year 1
-1.2
-1.0
-0.2
0.1
-2.8
3.0
Year 6
Year 5
Year 4
Year 3
Year 2
Year 1Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6 -0.7
-0.5
0.0
0.1
-5.3
8.3
Year 6
Year 5
Year 4
Year 3
Year 2
Year 1
Difference from national APS % pupils with no prior attainment
% pupils with no EYFS profile
Absence Persistent absence % sessions missed % pupils who missed 10% or more sessions
Cohort
National %
School % 6.4
8.8
361
School %
National %
Cohort
6.3
8.7
365
Key stage 2
Example schoolURN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
4.6 3.9 4.1
3.9 4 3.9
- - 361
1
2
3
4
5
6
2015 2016 2017
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Perisitant absence 2016
Fixed term exclusions Permanent exclusions% of pupils excluded
Nat2016 (1)
2015 (1)
2
0.5 0.2
Key stage 2
Example school
School % 0.8 1.20.0
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
National % 0.5 0.2
5 2
0.9
01Number
4.3 0.2
1.1 0.5
5
0
1
2
2014 2015 2016
National
= 1 pupil
Key stage 2
separate keys for 2015 and 16/17 to reflect shading/sigs?
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Trends over timeProgress quintiles displaying percentile rank
Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1* Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1* Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1*
2015 (30) 64 2015 (30) 28 2015 (30) 11
2016 (30) 55 2016 (30) 24 2016 (30) 22
2017 (30) 62 2017 (30) 21 2017 (30) 21
2015 (30) 89 2015 (30) 75 2015 (30) 77
2016 (30) 78 2016 (30) 79 2016 (30) 75
2017 (30) 84 2017 (30) 81 2017 (30) 73
2015 (30) 33 2015 (30) 21 2015 (30) 19
2016 (30) 24 2016 (30) 19 2016 (30) 11
2017 (30) 29 2017 (30) 8 2017 (30) 3
2015 (30) 58 2015 (30) 25 2015 (30) 25
2016 (30) 59 2016 (30) 19 2016 (30) 27
2017 (30) 57 2017 (30) 22 2017 (30) 25
2015 (30) 47 2015 (30) 59 2015 (30) 21
2016 (30) 59 2016 (30) 55 2016 (30) 29
2017 (30) 43 2017 (30) 37 2017 (30) 28
Note: 2015 quintiles and percentiles are based on value added meaures; 2016 and 2017 quintiles and percentiles are based on progress measures.
*Quintile 1 and 5 have a broader range of scores, see here for quintile boundaries
() Cohort
Disadvantaged
Significantly below national Significantly above national
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Middle at KS1
High at KS1
Overall
Low at KS1
Example school
Reading Writing
Bottom 20% Top 20% Bottom 20% Top 20% Bottom 20% Top 20%
Mathematics
Change in methodology or calculations
Reading progress Reading progress scatterplot
Bottom 10% Top 10%
Key stage 2
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567Example school
All
Low at KS1
Middle at KS1
-1.6 0.0/0.5
High at KS1
Disadvantaged
1.2 0.0
0.5 0.0
-8.9 0.0 11
33
25
15
Number of
pupils
included
Progress National
-1.3 0.0 51
-15.0 -10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0
Ke
y S
tag
e 2
pro
gre
ss
Key Stage 1 prior attainment
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 5 10 15 20 25
Other national
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Significantly above national and in top 10% Significantly below national and in bottom 10% Girls SEN = bold black borderBoys OtherDisadvantaged
Reading attainment Reading attainment scatterplot
School % National %
Key stage 2
Example school
Average
scaled
score
Diff no Cohort
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Low at KS11 1 11
2All
72 66 51
18 18 11
11 19 -4 51
High at KS1
Disadvantaged
Middle at KS182 64
100 97
4 19/24
34 49
65 66/75
-5/-7 33
96
103
-1 15
-1/-3 33
0 15
103
2 9 -2 2595
25
96
4
0
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Ke
y S
tag
e 2
Key Stage 1 prior attainment
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
0 5 10 15 20 25
National for all
pupils
Prior attainment
nationalOther nationalExpected+ %
High
standard %
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Girls SEN = bold black borderBoys OtherDisadvantaged National
Writing (teacher assessment) progress Writing (teacher assessment) progress scatterplot
Bottom 10% Top 10%
Writing data is based on teacher assessments. Users should be cautious when using this data.
Key stage 2
Example school URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Number of
pupils
included
NationalProgress
1.8 0.0 50
-5.6 0.0 26
3.7 0.0
3.2 0.0
32
10
1.1 0.0/0.6 14
All
Low at KS1
Middle at KS1
High at KS1
Disadvantaged
-15.00 -10.00 -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 Key Stage 1 prior attainment
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 5 10 15 20 25
Girls SEN = bold black borderBoys OtherDisadvantaged
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Other national
Significantly below national and in bottom 10%Significantly above national and in top 10%
Ke
y S
tag
e 2
pro
gre
ss
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Writing (teacher assessment) attainment Writing (teacher assessment) attainment scatterplot
School % National %
Writing data is based on teacher assessments. Users should be cautious when using this data.
Cohort
6
3
Diff no
Key stage 2
Example school
81 74 52
27 15 52
27 25 0 11
0 0 0 11
94 82 3 32
22 11 3 32
100 99 0 7
100 54 3 7
75 74/80 -1/-3 32
13 15/20 -1/-3 32
All
Low at KS1
Middle at KS1
High at KS1
Disadvantaged
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Key Stage 1 prior attainment
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
0 5 10 15 20 25
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
National for all
pupils
Prior attainment
nationalOther nationalExpected+ %
Greater depth
%
Ke
y S
tag
e 2
Girls SEN = bold black borderBoys OtherDisadvantaged National
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Mathematics progress
Bottom 10% Top 10%
2.5 0.0 49
Number of
pupils
included
NationalProgress
Key stage 2
Example school
Mathematics progress scatterplot
All
Low at KS1
Middle at KS1
High at KS1
Disadvantaged
26
1.9 0.0/0.5 31
-2.2 0.0 9
4.2 0.0
2.5 0.0 14
-15.00 -10.00 -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00
Key Stage 1 prior attainment
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 5 10 15 20 25
Other national
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Significantly above national and in top 10% Significantly below national and in bottom 10%
Ke
y S
tag
e 2
pro
gre
ss
Girls SEN = bold black borderBoys OtherDisadvantaged
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Mathematics attainment Mathematics attainment scatterplot
School % National %
Key stage 2
Example school
0
Average
scaled
score
106.2
101.014 -1 9
0
Cohort
6All
83 70 52
25 17 4 52
Diff no
9Low at KS1
Middle at KS1
High at KS1
32
9
Disadvantaged
0
100 69 9
100 98 0
75 70/80 0/-1
0
106.116 8 2 32
108.189 51 3 9
32104.6
13 17/25 -2/-1 32
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Key Stage 1 prior attainment
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
0 5 10 15 20 25Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
National for all pupils
Prior attainment national
Other nationalExpected+ %High
standard %
Ke
y S
tag
e 2
Girls SEN = bold black borderBoys OtherDisadvantaged National
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
English grammar, punctuation and spelling (EGPS)
15/16 15
10
16 14 26
18 18 14
16
1711 9
All
Low at KS1
Middle at KS1
High at KS1
92 73 32
23
22/26 32
Low at KS1
Middle at KS1
High at KS1
Disadvantaged
79 55 9
75 72/76 32
4 12 32
100 98 9
20
0 1 9
16Disadvantaged
9
22 52
Example school
National Cohort
Key stage 2
Spelling
% National Cohort Mark
All 16 15 5281 72 52
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 5 10 15 20
0 5 10 15 20
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
National for all pupils
Prior attainment national
Other nationalExpected+ %Greaterdepth %
National for all pupils
Prior attainment national
Other nationalAverage mark
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Science
Science data is based on teacher assessments. Users should be cautious when using this data.
Key stage 2
All 85 81 52
% National Cohort
Example school
100 84 36
100 99 14
96 81/85 26
20 29 10
High at KS1
Disadvantaged
Low at KS1
Middle at KS1
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
National for all
pupils
Prior attainment
nationalOther national
Expected+ %
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Reading
11
11
0
0
-3/-3
-3/-3
19
0
2
-2/-3
-3/-3
89
65
4
74
Emerging
Expected at EYFS
Exceeding at EYFS
Disadvantaged
85
Cohort
Key stage 1
Writing
National Cohort %
Overall68
22
Diff no
-9
-2
% Diff no
4
-2
Example school
National
68 65 208
12
94
16
0
Overall
Emerging at EYFS
Expected at EYFS
Exceeding at EYFS
Disadvantaged69 74/80 26
15 24/26
97
56
2
13
0
10
9
206
24 206
36 75
2 75
13/20 26
100 98 3
13 208
51 51 78
0 0 78
94
26
41 20 89
99 99 9
89 67 52 3
58 65/80 26
94
24 24 94
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
National for all pupils
Prior attainment national
Other nationalExpected+ %Greaterdepth %
National for all pupils
Prior attainment national
Other nationalExpected+ %Greaterdepth %
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Mathematics
Key stage 1
Science
Cohort
82 208
Example school
NationalDiff no
-1
-2
% National Cohort %
90
36
Overall
Disadvantaged
72 73 208
16 18 208
54
3 2 65
Overall
Emerging at EYFS
Expected at EYFS
Exceeding at EYFS
6511
1
Disadvantaged8 18/20 26
-2/-4
-3/-3
93 86 109
10928 18 10
7
96 82/85 26
65 73/80 26
100 99 1
100 59 1
0
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
National for all pupils Other nationalExpected+ %
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
National for all
pupils
Prior attainment
nationalOther nationalExpected+ %
Greaterdepth %
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Phonics
Proportion meeting the expected standard
Year 1 By end of Year 2
Example school
%
National
Cohort
77
15
63
74
Key stage 1
2015 2016 2017 2015 2016
87
90
15
2017
15 10
87
90
12
62 64 84
91
%
National
Cohort
81
10
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
All pupils National All pupils National
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Early Years Foundation Stage Profile
% good level of development Mathematics % expected +
Exceeding
51 53 32 20 61 62 35 30 55 46 32 31 % 63 58 31 30 67 63 32 33 61 54 35 36
69 69 32 31 76 76 33 33 75 75 35 35 National all 73 73 34 34 76 76 31 31 77 77 32 32
- 71 - 40 - 81 - 42 - 79 - 46 National other - 74 - 37 - 80 - 35 - 81 - 30
198 19 198 19 200 21 200 21 207 13 207 13 Cohort 198 19 198 19 21 200 21 207 207 13 207 13
Expected
2014 2015 2016
Key stage 1
2014 2015 2016
%
Expected Exceeding Expected
Example school
Exceeding
Cohort
National all
National other
ExceedingExpected Exceeding Expected Exceeding Expected
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
All pupils Disadvantaged National for all pupils Other national All pupils Disadvantaged National for all pupils Other national
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Early Years Foundation Stage Profile
Reading % expected + Writing % expected +
56 52 30 32 61 62 31 32 58 54 35 34 54 53 34 33 59 48 31 30 58 46 31 29
74 74 26 26 76 76 27 27 77 77 29 29 67 67 35 35 71 71 36 36 73 73 38 38
- 75 - 26 - 79 - 40 - 82 - 41 - 76 - 40 - 75 - 40 - 79 - 41
198 19 198 19 200 21 200 21 207 13 207 13 198 19 198 19 200 21 200 21 207 13 207 13
Key stage 1
expected high expected high
Example school
highhighexpected
2014 2015 2016 2014 2015
expected high expected high expected
% %
2016
National all National all
Cohort
National other National other
Cohort
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
All pupils Disadvantaged National for all pupils Other national All pupils Disadvantaged National for all pupils Other national