gri nw transparency project
DESCRIPTION
GRI NW TRANSPARENCY PROJECT. Olaf Islei OFGEM RCC 13 May 2009. PHASE ONE. OUTSTANDING ACTIONS. PHASE TWO. NETWORK USERS’ COMMON POSITION. THE PRIORITIES. Information on Capacity availability. Gas Flow Information. Gas Quality Information. Balancing and Security of Supply Information. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
GRI NWTRANSPARENCY PROJECT
Olaf IsleiOFGEM
RCC13 May 2009
2
PHASE ONE
3
E.ON GT
Fluxys
Svenska
Kraftnät
RWE TNG
National
GridIUK
Gas-link
WIN-GAS
OntrasGRT-gaz
Energinet.dk
Gasunie DT
DEPSwede
gasGRT-
gaz DTGTS BBL
(C1) Max technical capacity
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place in place in placein place
in place
in place
in place
(C2) Interruption in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
April 2009
in place
in place in place in placein place
in place
in place
(C3) Daily commercial firm and interruptible capacity
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place in place in placein place
in place
in place
in place
(F1) Daily flow / aggregated Allocation
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
Oct 2009
April 2009
in place
March 2009
in place in placein place
in place
in place
May 2009
(F2) Daily prompt allocation information
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place in place in place in place
in place
in place
(F3) Daily aggregate day-ahead nominations
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
Oct 2009
April2009
July 2009
March 2009
Dec 2009
March 2009
No date
in place
Dec 2009
(F4) Historic gas flow information database
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
April 2009
in place
in place in place in placein place
in place
in place
May 2009
Number of IPs 22 19 1 5 8 4 1 8 3 9 6 7 2 1 5 25 43 minus rule IPs 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0
TSOs report published Specific date Less than three shippers Not committed to dateNot applicable
4
TSO ISSUE COMPLETION DATE
BBL IT issues delayed expected release date (F1, F4, F3)
May 2009 &Dec. 2009
DEP IT issues (F3) Dec 2009
Energienet.dk IT issues (F3) April 2009 (?)
Ontras New IT system, -3 shipper rule(C2, F1, F3, F4)
April 2009 (?)
GRTgaz Shipper consultation (F3) July 2009
Gasunie DT IT issues (F3) Dec 2009
WINGAS Shipper concerns (F1, F3) October 2009
GRTgaz DT Resource constraints (F3) (?)
OUTSTANDING ACTIONS
5
PHASE TWO
6
NETWORK USERS’ COMMON POSITION
Gas Quality Information
Information on Capacity
availability
Gas Flow Information
Balancing and Security of Supply
Information
THE PRIORITIES
Why these priorities?
EFET Eurogas IFIEC
GEODE eurelectric OGP
“common position on minimum transparency
requirements”
1. Harmonisation of existing informationTwo proposed workstreams 2. Incremental release of new information
7
Network User Requirement
1.Daily aggregate demand forecast for each balancing zone D-1 at 08:00
Third Package Requirement
TSO to publish ex-ante and ex-post supply and demand information based on nominations, forecasts and realised flows
Market participants shall provide the TSO with the required information
DEMAND INFORMATION
BENEFIT SECURITY OF SUPPLY AND REDUCE SYSTEM BALANCING COSTS
8
POSSIBLE INFORMATION?
(D1) Day-ahead aggregate demand forecast (D-1)
• Detail…
(D2) Actual aggregate system demand (D+1)
• Detail…
(D3) Historic system demand database
• Detail…
(D4) Annual average demand profile
• Detail…
9
NATIONAL GRID: DEMAND INFORMATION
LDZ Cold Demand - Energy
Demand Actual LDZ D+1
National Cold Demand - Energy
Demand Forecast Error D-4
Demand Forecast NTS
LDZ Cold Demand - Volume
Demand Actual LDZ D+6
National Cold Demand - Volume
Demand Forecast Error D-3
Demand Forecast NTS
Hourly
LDZ SND - Energy
Demand Actual LDZ DM M+15
National SND - Energy
Demand Forecast Error D-2
Demand Actual NTS D+1
LDZ SND - Volume
Demand Actual LDZ NDM M+15
National SND - Volume
Demand Forecast NTS D-5
Demand Actual NTS D+6
LDZ Warm Demand - Energy
Demand Forecast NTS Cold
National Warm Demand - Energy
Demand Forecast NTS D-4
Demand Actual Historical
LDZ Warm Demand - Volume
Demand Forecast NTS SND
National Warm Demand - Volume
Demand Forecast NTS D-3
Demand Forecast LDZ
Demand Forecast NTS Warm
Demand Forecast Error D-5
Demand Forecast NTS D-2
*Source: National Grid data dictionary
10
TSO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE
GRI Country TSO
Daily aggregate demand forecasts for each balancing zone (D-1 at 08:00)
GRI Country TSO
Daily aggregate demand forecasts for each balancing zone (D-1 at 08:00)
SWEDENSwedegas No
GERMANY
DEP No
Svenska Kraftnät
No Gasunie DT No
E.ON GTNoIRELAND Gaslink Yes (in part) †
GREAT BRITAIN
National Grid Yes (fully) RWE TNG No
Interconnector NA WINGAS TRAN. No
DENMARK Energinet.dk No** Ontras No
NETHERLANDSGTS No GdF DT No
BBL NA FRANCE GRTgaz Yes (fully) ††
BELGIUM Fluxys No
11
BALANCING INFORMATION
Network User Requirement
1. Real time information on imbalance charges
2. Linepack information (ex-ante, ex-post, historical)
3. Details of TSO balancing actions (nature, timing, volume and cost information)
Third Package Requirement
The TSO shall make public measures taken as well as costs incurred and revenue generated to balance the system
To enable network users to take timely corrective action, the TSO shall publish sufficient, well-timed and reliable information on the balancing status of network users
12
POSSIBLE INFORMATION?
(B1) Physical balancing action report (D+1)
• Detail…
(B2) Market based balancing action report (D+1)
• Detail…
(B3) Physical balancing action alert (D–1)
• Detail…
(B4) Linepack information (D+1)
• Detail…
(B5) Real time information on imbalance charges
• Detail…
MINIMISE INDIVIDUAL SHIPPER AND TOTAL SYSTEM BALANCING COSTS
13
TSO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE
TSO P1 P1 P2Calculation method for imbalance quantity and charges (B1)
Imbalance charges per balancing period – real time (B2)
Linepack information
SWSwedegas NA NA NASvenska Kraftnät Yes (fully) †† NA†† NA††
IE Gaslink Yes (fully) Yes (fully) NA
GBNational Grid Yes (fully) Yes (fully) Yes (fully)Interconnector NA† NA† NA†
DK Energinet.dk Yes (fully) Yes (in part)* NA
NLGTS Yes (fully) Yes (fully) NABBL NA† NA† NA†
BE Fluxys Yes (fully) Yes (fully) NA
DE
DEP Yes (fully) Yes (in part)** NAGasunie DT Yes (fully) Yes (in part)** NAE.ON GT Yes (fully) Yes (in part)** NARWE TNG Yes (fully) Yes (in part)** NAWINGAS TRAN. Yes (fully) Yes (in part)** NAOntras Yes (fully) Yes (in part)** NAGdF DT Yes (fully) Yes (in part)** NA
FR GRTgaz Yes (fully) Yes (in part)*** NA
14
GAS QUALITY INFORMATION
Network User Requirement
1. Full specification of gas quality parameters
2. Procedures for dealing with off-specification gas and costs
3. Daily actual measured values of key parameters (D+1)
Third Package Requirement
Publication of information on gas quality and pressure requirements
15
TSO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSESTSO P3 P3 P3
Full specification of gas quality parameters (Q1)
Procedures for dealing with off-spec gas and conversion costs (Q2)
Daily actual measured values of key parameters at D+3 (Q3)
SWSwedegas Yes (in part) Yes (in part) Yes (in part)†
Svenska Kraftnät NA NA NAIE Gaslink Yes (fully) Yes (fully) Yes (in part)†
GBNational Grid Yes (fully) Yes (fully) Yes (fully)Interconnector Yes (fully) Yes (fully) Yes (in part)†
DK Energinet.dk Yes (fully) Yes (fully) Yes (in part)†
NL GTS Yes (fully) Yes (fully) Yes (in part)††
BEBBL Yes (in part)* Yes (in part)* NoFluxys Yes (fully) Yes (fully) Yes (in part)††
DE
DEP No** Yes (in part) NoGasunie DT No** Yes (in part) NoE.ON GT No** Yes (in part) NoRWE TNG No** Yes (in part) NoWINGAS TRAN. No** Yes (in part) NoOntras No** Yes (in part) NoGdF DT No** Yes (in part) No
FR GRTgaz Yes (fully) Yes (fully) Yes (in part)†††
16
TRANSMISSION TRANSPARENCY MEETING31 MARCH
• TSO initial proposal1. Identify different balancing regimes2. Required information in each regime identified by NRA and network users3. TSO to commit to project plan to publish information
• No proposal on demand forecasts• No proposal on gas quality• Network User concern that proposal will not meet minimum
transparency requirements
No agreement on way forward
17
GAS STORAGE TRANSPARENCY
Network User Requirement
1. Improved transparency
Third Package Requirement
Each storage system operator shall make public the amount of gas in each storage facility (…) inflows and outflows, and available storage capacity, including for those facilities exempted from third party access (…) at least every day
18
STORAGE TRANSPARENCY MEETING20 APRIL
• GRI NW regulators, EFET, Eurogas, GSE, European Commission
• Project proposal• Daily publication information at hub level:
– Aggregated storage stocks– Aggregated storage inflows– Aggregated storage outflows
• Preliminary dates: 1 October 2009
30 November 2009SUPPORTED BY ALL PRESENT AT THE MEETING
19
• Third package – proposed Gas Regulation amendments
TIMELINE
18 MONTHINTERIM PERIOD
Enter into force summer
2009
Legal requirement
2011
Agree deliverables
summer 2009
12 to 18 MONTHIMPLEMENTATION
Complete implementation
2011
• GRI NW – estimated project implementation timeline
Third package: the national regulatory authority shall ensure that all such information is made public
20
CONCLUSION
• Programme board supported proposal to use GRI NW as platform for early and coordinated implementation of new third package requirements
• Implementation where there is a clear legal requirement, avoid policy issues like linepack
• Over to the TSOs to make a sensible recommendation– New third package requirements– Commissions proposed guidelines
21