gri nw transparency project
DESCRIPTION
GRI NW Transparency Project. Pamela Taylor Head of European Strategy 9 June 2009. PROJECT STATUS: JANUARY 2008. PROJECT STATUS: MAY 2009. REGIONAL INITIATIVES AS FRAMEWORK FOR COORDINATED IMPLEMENTATION. WHAT NEXT FOR PHASE TWO?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
GRI NW Transparency Project
Pamela TaylorHead of European Strategy
9 June 2009
2
PROJECT STATUS: JANUARY 2008
E.ON GT
Fluxys
Svenska
Kraftnät
RWE TNG
National
GridIUK
Gas-link
WIN-GAS
On-tras
GRT gaz
Energinet.dk
Gas-unie DT
DEPSwede-
gasGRT-
gaz DTGTS BBL
(C1) Max technical capacity
in place earlierin
placein
placein
placeearlier in place
in place
in place
earlier in place in place earlier in placein
placein
place
(C2) Interruption later final finalin
placein
placelater earlier
in place
earlier later later earlier in placein
placefinal
(C3) Daily commercial firm and interruptible capacity
in place earlier laterin
placein
placeearlier in place
in place
in place
earlier in place in place later in placein
placein
place
(F1) Daily flow / aggregated Allocation
earlier earlier final laterin
placein
placelater earlier earlier
in place
earlier earlier earlier earlier earlierin
placefinal
(F2) Daily prompt allocation information
earlier in place finalin
placein
placein
placein
placein place
in place
in place
in place in place in place in placein
placein
place
(F3) Daily aggregate day-ahead nominations
later final final later finalin
placelater earlier earlier later earlier
in place
(F4) Historic gas flow information database
later in place final laterin
placein
placelater earlier earlier
in place
in place earlier later later in placein
placefinal
April 2008 earlier Existing before project start in place
October 2008 later no answer
December 2008 final
3
PROJECT STATUS: MAY 2009
E.ON GT
Fluxys
Svenska
Kraftnät
RWE TNG
National
GridIUK
Gas-link
WIN-GAS
OntrasGRT-gaz
Energinet.dk
Gasunie DT
DEPSwede
gasGRT-
gaz DTGTS BBL
(C1) Max technical capacity
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place in place in placein place
in place
in place
in place
(C2) Interruption in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
In place
in place
in place in place in placein place
in place
in place
(C3) Daily commercial firm and interruptible capacity
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place in place in placein place
in place
in place
in place
(F1) Daily flow / aggregated Allocation
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
Oct 2009
In place
in place
In place in place in placein place
in place
in place
In place
(F2) Daily prompt allocation information
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place in place in place in place
in place
in place
(F3) Daily aggregate day-ahead nominations
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
Oct 2009
In place
July 2009
May2009
Dec 2009
Dec 2009
No date
in place
Dec 2009
(F4) Historic gas flow information database
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
in place
In place
in place
in place in place in placein place
in place
in place
In place
Number of IPs 22 19 1 5 8 4 1 8 3 9 6 7 2 1 5 25 43 minus rule IPs 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0
TSOs report published Specific date Less than three shippers Not committed to dateNot applicable
REGIONAL INITIATIVES AS FRAMEWORK FOR COORDINATED IMPLEMENTATION
4
WHAT NEXT FOR PHASE TWO?
• 14 November network users priorities: balancing and demand and supply information
• 31 March no agreement reached• 20 April SSOs agree to improve storage
transparency • 23 April programme board endorse focus on 3rd
package• 05 May GSE plenary approve storage project• 13 May regional regulators support 3rd package
implementation
5
STORAGE TRANSPARENCY
Updated weekly Volume of gas in
storage Eight hub areas
Some major storage operators missing
1 October and30 November
2009
Updated daily Volume of gas in storage
Aggregated inflows Aggregated outflows
Eight hub areas Including all major storage
operators
• Ukraine/Russia dispute highlighted transparency issue
• Step toward early implementation of 3rd package• Quick win ahead of winter
6
THIRD PACKAGE REQUIREMENTSSUPPLY AND DEMAND
Network User Requirement
1.Daily aggregate demand forecast for each balancing zone D-1 at 08:00
Third Package Requirement
TSO to publish ex-ante and ex-post supply and demand information based on nominations, forecasts and realised flows
Market participants shall provide the TSO with the required information
7
THIRD PACKAGE REQUIREMENTSBALANCING INFORMATION
Network User Requirement
1. Real time information on imbalance charges
2. Linepack information (ex-ante, ex-post, historical)
3. TSO balancing actions (nature, timing, volume and cost information)
Third Package Requirement
Measures taken as well as costs incurred and revenue generated to balance the system
well-timed and reliable information on the balancing status of network users
8
THIRD PACKAGE REQUIREMENTSGAS QUALITY
Network User Requirement
1. Full specification of gas quality requirements
2. Procedures for dealing with off-spec gas
3. Actual measured values of gas quality parameters (D+2)
Third Package Requirement
Publication of information on gas quality and pressure requirements
9
PROPOSED COMITOLOGY GUIDELINES
• Endorsement of good progress achieved by stakeholders in GRI NW
• Includes new requirements:– real time information on gas flows and capacity
availability and interruptions– historic information on system use– long-term outlook of sold and available capacity
for all years where capacity is contracted
10
CONCLUSIONS
• Good progress achieved by all stakeholders in phase one!
• Storage operators already agreed to early 3rd package implementation
• Further improvements necessary:
– 3rd package
– Comitology guidelines
URGE TSOs TO BRING FORWARD PROPOSALS
11