final report of group 6 sundarijal hpp

57
FINAL REPORT ON RUM OF SUNDARIJAL HYDOPOWER PLANT A fourth year mini project for the partial fulfillment of requirement of Bachelors Degree in Civil Engineering (CIEG 406) PROJECT MEMBERS: GROUP: 6 Biplav Acharya (Roll No. 01) Ashish Dangal (Roll No. 12) Mingma Lama (Roll No. 31) Radheshyam Mandal (Roll No. 32) Rishab Nakarmi (Roll No. 33) Pratik Shahi (Roll No. 47) Sagun Shrestha (Roll No. 53) SUBMITTED TO: DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND GEOMATICS ENGINEERING Prof. Dr. Ing. Ramesh Kumar Maskey Project In-charge January 4, 2014 KATHMANDU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND GEOMATICS ENGINEERING

Upload: pratikshahithakuri

Post on 14-Dec-2015

51 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

FINAL REPORT ON

RUM OF SUNDARIJAL HYDOPOWER PLANT

A fourth year mini project for the partial fulfillment of requirement of Bachelor’s Degree in

Civil Engineering (CIEG 406)

PROJECT MEMBERS:

GROUP: 6

Biplav Acharya (Roll No. 01)

Ashish Dangal (Roll No. 12)

Mingma Lama (Roll No. 31)

Radheshyam Mandal (Roll No. 32)

Rishab Nakarmi (Roll No. 33)

Pratik Shahi (Roll No. 47)

Sagun Shrestha (Roll No. 53)

SUBMITTED TO:

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND GEOMATICS ENGINEERING

Prof. Dr. Ing. Ramesh Kumar Maskey

Project In-charge

January 4, 2014

KATHMANDU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND GEOMATICS

ENGINEERING

Page 2: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

2

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Ramesh Kumar Maskey, for providing us an opportunity to

work on this project and helping in various aspects during consultation. We would also like to

thank the staffs of DOCGE and friends for their unending support and encouragement.

Page 3: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

3

ABSTRACT

Sundarijal Hydropower Plant, although being an old plant is generating 640kW, its installed capacity. The

plant is already in the process of RUM by NEA which is on its way for increase in power generation. The

RUM project carried out by us, a team of 7 students of Fourth Year Civil Engineering program has

detected some components that have degraded and has given suitable design, drawings and suggestions.

The hydropower plant is found to be optimistic in terms of further development and more hydropower

generation.

Page 4: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

4

Table of Contents ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................. 3

ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................................................... 7

1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 8

2. PROJECT AREA ................................................................................................................................................... 9

2.1 History ......................................................................................................................................................... 9

2.2 Geography ................................................................................................................................................. 10

2.3 Climate ...................................................................................................................................................... 10

3. THEORY ........................................................................................................................................................... 11

3.1 Rehabilitation ............................................................................................................................................ 11

3.2 The Bathtub Curve .................................................................................................................................... 12

3.3 Levelling: ................................................................................................................................................... 12

3.4 Bowditch Rule: .......................................................................................................................................... 13

3.5 Penstocks: ................................................................................................................................................. 14

3.6 Penstock Alignment .................................................................................................................................. 14

3.7 Gross Head (H) and Net Head (h): ............................................................................................................ 15

3.8 Firm Power and Secondary Power: ........................................................................................................... 15

3.9 Flow Duration Curve: ................................................................................................................................ 15

3.10 Mass Flow Curve ..................................................................................................................................... 16

3.11 Support Piers ........................................................................................................................................... 16

3.12 Energy and Hydraulic Grade Lines: ......................................................................................................... 16

The Bernoulli Equation ............................................................................................................................... 17

4. RATIONALE ...................................................................................................................................................... 17

5. SCOPE OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................................................................. 18

6. OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................................................... 18

7. METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................. 18

8. Field Measurement Of Head Of Sundarijal HPP .......................................................................................... 19

8.1 Height Difference From Powerhouse To Dam Site ................................................................................... 19

8.2 Height Difference From Dam Site To Powerhouse ................................................................................... 22

8.3 Correction By Bowditch’s Method ............................................................................................................ 25

9. FIELD MEASUREMENT OF DISCHARGE............................................................................................................ 30

Page 5: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

5

9.1 Determination of Cross Section ................................................................................................................ 30

9.2 Determination of Velocity ......................................................................................................................... 32

9.3 Discharge .................................................................................................................................................. 32

9.4 Measurement of discharge from canal ..................................................................................................... 32

9.5 Flow Duration Curve ................................................................................................................................. 33

9.5.1 MIP Method ....................................................................................................................................... 33

9.5.2 Flow Duration Curve .......................................................................................................................... 34

9.6 Total Discharge ......................................................................................................................................... 35

10. FINDING HYDROPOWER POTENTIAL USING OBTAINED FIELD INFORMATION ............................................. 36

10.1 Design of penstock for that hydropower potential ................................................................................ 36

10.2 Penstock Alignment ................................................................................................................................ 37

10.3 Calculation of major and minor losses .................................................................................................... 38

10.3.1 Calculation of friction factor ............................................................................................................ 38

10.3.1 Calculation of head loss ................................................................................................................... 39

10.4 Remarks .............................................................................................................................................. 39

11 CALCULATION OF FIRM POWER AND SECONDARY POWER .......................................................................... 40

12. CALCULATION OF FLOW MASS CURVE ......................................................................................................... 42

13 .DESIGN OF SUPPORT PIER ............................................................................................................................ 43

13.1 Design ..................................................................................................................................................... 43

13.2 Stability Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 47

13.3 Cost Estimation ....................................................................................................................................... 48

14. INSPECTION WORKS...................................................................................................................................... 49

15. PUBLIC CONSULTATION ................................................................................................................................ 50

16. PROJECT SCHEDULE ...................................................................................................................................... 51

17. OUTCOMES ................................................................................................................................................... 52

18. LIMITATIONS OF THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................................... 52

19. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................... 52

20. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 53

PICTORIAL HIGHLIGHTS ....................................................................................................................................... 54

Page 6: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

6

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 Location of Sundarijal in Nepal ............................................................................................................... 9

Figure 2 View of Bagmati from Sundarijal Source: Wikipedia.org ...................................................................... 10

Figure 3 The figure illustrates how energy production is lost over time. The Upgrade vs Life extension .......... 11

Figure 4 Bathtub Curve ....................................................................................................................................... 12

Figure 5 Differential Levelling ............................................................................................................................. 13

Figure 6 Cross Section A-A of river...................................................................................................................... 30

Figure 7 Cross Section B-B of River ..................................................................................................................... 31

Figure 8 Flow Duration Curve ............................................................................................................................. 34

Figure 9 Penstock Alignment .............................................................................................................................. 37

Figure 10 Moody Diagram .................................................................................................................................. 38

Figure 11 Flow Mass Curve ................................................................................................................................. 42

Figure 12 Cross Section of Penstock ................................................................................................................... 44

Figure 13 Support pier elevation with saddle and penstock .............................................................................. 45

Figure 14 Cross section of penstock resting on support pier ............................................................................. 46

Page 7: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

7

ACRONYMS ASME – American Society of Mechanical Engineers

BM – Bench Mark

HPP – Hydropower Power Plant

JNN – Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology

MIP – Medium Irrigation Project

RUM – Rehabilitation Upgradation and Modernization

USBR – The United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR)

VDC – Village Development Committee

Page 8: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

8

1. INTRODUCTION Sundarijal HPP is the second oldest hydropower established in Nepal which lies in Sundarijal VDC named

after Hindu goddess ‘Sundarimai’. The VDC touches Nuwakot and Sindhupalchowk district and is located

in Shivapuri National Park at the north of Kathmandu Valley. It is 15 km northeast from the centre of

Kathmandu. The climate is of Temperate type. During summer, the temperature is 25.5 ˚ C in average and

temperature drops down to 0 ˚ C during winter. Tamangs, Chheteris and Brahmins are the major ethnic

group of this region. The major religion here is Buddhism.

With installed capacity of 640 kW and annual design generation of 4.77 GWh was commissioned in 1934

AD in a grant from British government.The powerhouse lies near Sundarijal Buspark. Initially, there were

three units of turbines; one of 600kW and two of 320kW. Due to mechanical failure, the larger one was

shut down.

The salient features of Sundarijal HPP is listed below:

Type Run of River

Location Sundarijal, Kathmandu

Installed capacity 640 kW

Annual average energy 4.77 GWh

Maximum net head 750 ft. (228.6m)

Penstock 1700 m long, 0.61 m dia.

Turbine

Number and Type

Rated output

Rated Speed

2, Horizontal Pelton

485 kW

900 rpm

Generator

Rated output

Rated voltage

Rated frequency

Power factor

377 kVA

3.3 kV

50 Hz

0.85

Power transformer 3.3/11 kVA, 2 Nos.

Transmission line 11 kV

Table 1: SAILENT FEATURES OF SUNDARIJAL HYDROPOWER STATION

Page 9: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

9

2. PROJECT AREA

Figure 1 Location of Sundarijal in Nepal

Country: Nepal

Zone Bagmati Zone

District: Kathmandu District

Area

Total: 5.18 km2 (2.00 sq mi)

Population (2001)

Total: 2,586

Density: 500/km2 (1,300/sq mi)

Time zone: Nepal Time (UTC+5:45)

Postal code: 44603 Area code(s): 01

Sundarijal is a village development committee in Kathmandu District in the Bagmati Zone of central

Nepal.

2.1 History The VDC was named after the Hindu goddess, Sundarimai. A temple is dedicated to the deity in

Sundarijal. In 1960, the Sundarijal Military Detention Camp was the location of Nepali Congress leaders

B.P. Koirala (the Prime Minister), Ganesh Man Singh, Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, Diwan Singh Rai, Ram

Narayan Mishra, Yogendra Man Sherchan, and Jaman Singh Gurung. They were held without trial for

eight years due to their participation in a 1960 coup.

Page 10: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

10

2.2 Geography Sundarijal is located 15 kilometres (9 mi) northeast of Nepal's capital, Kathmandu. It is west of

Gagalphedi, east of Nayapati and Baluwa, and north of Aalapot. The VDC touches Nuwakot and

Sindhulpalchok Districts to the north.

Sundarijal covers an area of 5.18 square kilometres (2 sq mi). The Bagmati River flows through the VDC,

where it is joined by the Shyalmati and Nagmati Rivers. Largely hilly in its terrain with few flat areas, the

VDC is covered by forests. Shivapuri National Park covers large amounts of the Sundarijal.

Figure 2 View of Bagmati from Sundarijal Source: Wikipedia.org

2.3 Climate The climate of Sundarijal is temperate. The average for the summer is 25.5˚C while that for the winter is

0˚C.

Page 11: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

11

3. THEORY

3.1 Rehabilitation

Hydroelectric station rehabilitation covers a broad set of activities, including repairing/replacing

components, upgrading generating capability and availability, realigning services to meet market

opportunities and new market requirements and modifying the management of water resources to enhance

ecosystems. In the current study, rehabilitation is focused on the major electrical and mechanical

equipment associated with power generation, namely the turbine and generator. Other components would

be included in most rehabilitation projects and would contribute to the overall cost but major civil works

changes (with the possible exception of

draft tube modifications) are excluded.

Rehabilitation can start with the

replacement of equipment on a “like for

like” basis where there is minimum effort

to enhance the overall output of the station.

The primary objective of this is to provide

“life extension” to the existing facilities

and restore their initial performances. In

contrast it can often be justified to include

an “upgrade” of the equipment (efficiency,

output) which yields greater output but at

increased costs which is justified by the

additional revenue over service life of the

equipment. This study examines both of

these investment scenarios. Non-structural

optimization, such as improved operation rules based on improved hydrology, timing of releases in

cascades etc has not been considered.

Project Expansion

Hydroelectric generating stations have been known to have service lives of up to 100 years and in some

instances even longer. Where the service life is long then it is quite likely that the station may not be

developed to its economic potential based on today’s energy and capacity values and equipment cost and

performance. In such instances an increase in station capacity (Project Expansion) by installing

additional generating units can be justified. In most cases significant increases in station capacity will

require installation of additional units, which if not foreseen and prepared for in the original

design/construction will likely require major civil works. Such cases of project expansion are not

covered (except in passing) in this report.

Project Redevelopment

In projects where the residual service life is too short to justify Rehabilitation or Project Expansion,

Project Redevelopment can be considered. In this scenario the civil works (potentially a dam and power

facilities) is redeveloped with completely new generating equipment. This scenario is not considered in

this study since it, in most cases, requires extensive site-specific engineering studies including

environmental and sustainability assessments which cannot be treated in a broad based manner as is being

done for the current study. (Goldberg & Lier)

Figure 3 The figure illustrates how energy production is lost over time. The Upgrade vs Life extension

Page 12: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

12

3.2 The Bathtub Curve

The bathtub curve is widely used in reliability engineering. It describes a particular form of the hazard

function which comprises three parts. The first part is a decreasing failure rate, known as early failures. The

second part is a constant failure rate, known as random failures. The third part is an increasing failure rate,

known as wear-out failures. In less technical terms, in the early life of a product adhering to the bathtub

curve, the failure rate is high but rapidly decreasing as defective products are identified and discarded, and

early sources of potential failure such as handling and installation error are surmounted. In the mid-life of

a product—generally, once it reaches consumers—the failure rate is low and constant. In the late life of the

product, the failure rate increases, as age and wear take their toll on the product. Many consumer product

life cycles strongly exhibit the bathtub curve, such as computer processors.

(Bathtub curve, 2014)

3.3 Levelling:

Direct leveling

This method of leveling uses the measuredvertical distance to carry elevation from a knownpoint to an

unknown point. Direct leveling is themost precise method of determining elevation andyields accuracies

of third or higher orders. Whenthis method is specified for lower accuracysurveys, direct leveling is

sometimes referred toas “spirit” or “fly” levels. Fly levels are levelingoperations used to rerun original

levels to makesure that no mistake has been made. Fly levelsuse a shorter route and smaller number of

turningpoints than the original survey. Let’s take a lookat some of the processes involving direct leveling.

Figure 4 Bathtub Curve

Page 13: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

13

Differential Leveling

Differential leveling (also called direct leveling) is generally used in determining elevations of points to

establish a chain or network of BMs for future use. It requires a series of instrument setups along the

survey route; and for setup, a horizontal line of sight is established, using a sensitive level.

Some terminology used in Levelling:

Set: The location of the level. (where it is set-up)

Bench Mark (BM): A permanent point of known elevation.

Temporary Bench Mark (TBM): A point of known elevation.

Turning Point (TP): An intervening point between BMs or TBMs upon which a backsight and a foresight

are taken.

Backsight (BS): A rod reading taken by "looking back" at a point of known elevation such as a BM or TP.

Foresight (FS): A rod reading taken when "looking ahead" at a point where you want to determine its

elevation, such as a TP, TBM or BM.

Height of Instrument (HI): The elevation of the line of sight in the telescope of the level.

Balancing of Sights: The rod person keeps track of the distance of each FS and BS taken and tries to keep

them equal.

Closed Circuit: A complete trace of the line of sight of the instrument back to the beginning point.

Closure: The difference between beginning and ending elevations.

3.4 Bowditch Rule:

The Bowditch's method is used when both the linear and angular measurements are compatible to each

other, i.e., they are of equal precision. The corrections may be applied either analytically or may be

carried out graphically. This method of balancing of traverse is widely prevalent and most commonly

used. It is based on the assumption that angles (bearings) are observed to the same degree of precision

that distances can be measured.

Where, l=length of the current time,

∑l=sum of the traverse line lengths

∆L=latitude of the current line

Where, ∆D=departure of the current line

Figure 5 Differential Levelling

Ll

lCorrLat

Dl

lCorrDep

Page 14: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

14

3.5 Penstocks: A penstock is a pipe that conveys the flow from the forebay or surge tank to the turbine. Penstocks are

designed to carry water to the turbines with the least possible loss of head consistent with the overall

economy of the project. These are pressurized water conduits which convey water to the turbines from

free surfaces.

Design of penstock pipe:

Using USBR formula,

Veco=0.125√2gH

D=√(4Q/πv)

Sarkaria Formula,

D = 0.62 P0.35

H0.65

From JNN Guideline, D=(5.2Q3/H)1/7

For thickness of penstock pipe:

Pressure inside Penstock (p) = ρg (H+H0) = kg/cm2

Where, H = static head ; H0= dynamic head = v2/2g

t= pD/2σaη + ε

As per ASME code:

t= pR/(σaη-0.6 p) + 0.15

tmin= D/ 288

tmin= (D+200)/400

3.6 Penstock Alignment For the most economical alignment of pipeline, investigation of site must be done and make various

layouts on topographic maps. Estimate materials quantities for each layout and evaluation of its

constructability must be done.

When making the layouts, the penstock should e located on stale foundation sites such as along a ridge or

a bench that has been cut into the mountainside, avoiding of troublesome sites such as underground water

courses, landfill, fault zones and potential slide area is quite important. To minimize costly anchors and

costly pipe transitions sections, vertical bends, horizontal ends, and changes in diameter should be

combined in a way to have them at the same location.

Selection of the alignment at site should be based on the following criteria:

Forebay/ surge tank location

Ground slope

Minimum number of bends

Space for powerhouse area

Stability

Other site specific conditions

Page 15: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

15

3.7 Gross Head (H) and Net Head (h): The gross head is the difference between the water level in the headrace and the water level in the tailrace.

For storage plant, gross head (H) is the difference in water level in the reservoir and the water level in the

tailrace. For run-of river plant, it is a difference in water level in the point of diversion of water and water

level at the point where the water is returned back to river.

Net head is the head available for the turbine. It is equal to the difference of total head at the point of

entry and at the point of exit of the turbine. This includes the respective pressure and velocity pressure

and velocity head at both places.

For impulse turbine, Net head, h=H-Z-hf ; where, hf is headloss

3.8 Firm Power and Secondary Power:

The power, which is insured to a consumer at any time of the day, is known as firm power. Firm power is

completely dependable and available 100% of time. Such power corresponds to minimum stream flow.

Such power can e increased by the use of pondage so that greater minimum flow is available for 100% of

time.

The secondary power is the amount of power, which is excess of the firm power. It is also called surplus

or non-firm power. The plant can deliver the secondary power only for a part of a year. It is

comparatively less valuable and useful in an interconnected system of power plants.

3.9 Flow Duration Curve:

A graphical representation of runoff is the flow duration curve. It has discharge plotted on the Y-axis and

the percentage of time duration for which that magnitude (or move) is available on X-axis.

Flow duration curve are used in assessing the dependability of the discharge and also used in assessing

dependable power in runoff river plant with or without pondage.

Flow –duration curves find considerable use in water resources planning and development activities.

Some of the important uses are:

In evaluating various dependable flows in the planning of water resources engineering projects.

Evaluating the characteristics of the hydro power potential of a river

Designing of the drainage system.

In flood-control studies.

Computing the sediment load and dissolved solid load od stream.

Comparing the adjacent catchment with the view to extend the stream flow data.

Page 16: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

16

3.10 Mass Flow Curve

The flow mass curve is a plot of the cumulative discharge volume against time plotted in chronological

order. The ordinate of the mass curve, V at any time t is thus

V=∫ 𝑄 𝑑𝑡𝑡

0

Where t0 is the time at the beginning of the curve and Q is the discharge rate. The slope of the mass curve

at any point represents 𝑑𝑉

𝑑𝑡=Q=rate of flow at that instant.

3.11 Support Piers

Support piers are required along the straight sections of exposed penstock between anchor blocks.

The maximum spacing of support piers to avoid overstressing the pipe is generally 5m. Thin-wall plain

pipe can buckle at the support piers with relatively short spans. In this case the permissile span can be

increased by welding a wear plate to the pipe at each support. This may be economical for pipes larger

than 300 mm diameter. Corners of wear plates should e cut with a radius, to avoid stress concentrations.

Note that a wear plates is also required where the pipe leaves an anchor lock, if the span to the first

support pier exceeds that allowed for plain pipe. It is usually not economical to increase the pipe wall

thickness in order to increase the support pier spacing, but this should be considered where the cost of

support piers is significant.

A 1400 bearing area from the centre of the penstock diameter should be provided to support the penstock

pipe. Placing a steel saddle plate above the support pier where the penstock pipe rests along with a 3mm

thick tar paper minimizes frictional effect and increases the useful life of the pipe. C- clamps may also be

provided to protect the pipe from vandalism and a sideways movement, but there must be a gap between

the surface of the pipe and the C- clamp, so that axial forces are not transferred to the support pier.

3.12 Energy and Hydraulic Grade Lines:

The energy grade line (EGL) and the hydraulic grade line (HGL) provide a graphical interpretation of

Bernoulli's equation. The EGL represents the total head available with respect to a chosen datum.

The EGL is a constant for frictionless flow where no work or heat is associated with the process. On the

other hand, the HGL is the sum of static pressure and elevation head.

Sometimes, this is also referred as the piezometric head and is the height a fluid column would rise in a

piezometer.

Page 17: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

17

The Bernoulli Equation

For steady, inviscid, incompressible flow the total energy remains constant along a stream line as

expressed through the Bernoulli Equation:

p + 1/2 v2 + h = constant along a streamline

where:

p = static pressure (relative to the moving fluid)

ρ = density

ϒ= specific weight

v = flow velocity

g = acceleration of gravity

h = elevation height

Each term of this equation has the dimension force per unit area - psi, lb/ft2 or N/m2.

For a fluid flowing without any losses due to friction (major losses) or components (minor losses) - the

energy line would be at a constant level. In a practical world the energy line decreases along the flow due

to losses.

4. RATIONALE The efficiency of all structures and machines decrease after they’ve been used for a long time. Ignoring

this aspect will not only decrease the performance of the power plant but the risk of the plant will start to

increase exponentially at a certain time and the plant may shut down due to uncontrollable problems in

the future. Therefore, rehabilitation of the components of the power plant has to be done while the risk

doesn’t escalate.

Sundarijal Hydropower Plant has been in operation since 1934 AD and has had minor upgrades to some

electrical and mechanical components during its operational life. The penstock and station flows are part

of the water supply system to Kathmandu Valley and are looked after by Kathmandu Upatyaka Khanepai

Limited (KUKL). Therefore, it is a good idea to examine the civil components if they need rehabilitation

or upgrades before the risks escalate.

Page 18: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

18

5. SCOPE OF THE PROJECT The scope of this project is to study Sundarijal HPP under the constraints of hydrology, engineering

survey and civil engineering under hydropower engineering. However, the study of catchment area and

the its basin isn’t studied. Similarly, the study of rocks, mines, minerals and other geological aspects are

out of the scope.

6. OBJECTIVES 1. To study the hydropower systems of Sundarijal HPP

2. To identify the components of Sundarijal Hydropower Plant this needs Rehabilitation, Maintenance

and Up gradation (RUM)

3. Recommend RUM measures and design/redesign necessary structures

4. To check the hydropower potential of the HPP

7. METHODOLOGY Desk Study

Desk study covers various literature reviews, project planning etc. Required information was

gathered via various sources and results from it were implemented at various steps of our

project implementation.

Consultation and field visits

After consultation with faculties, friends, local people and information gathered from the

desk study and the site we planned the project.

Design

Based on our survey and requirements, we made calculations of head of the hydropower,

discharge, flow duration curve and designed alternate alignment of penstock. Support pier

was designed which can be used to construct in place of the displaced piers at the site.

Page 19: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

19

8. Field Measurement of Head of Sundarijal HPP

8.1 HEIGHT DIFFERENCE FROM POWERHOUSE TO DAM SITE

WL-M 0.885

SN BS FS RISE FALL RL HD CD

T M B T M B 999.015

1 1.155 1.105 1.055 1000.000 30 30

2 1.165 0.94 0.715 2.29 2.19 2.09 0 1.085 998.915 89 119

3 1.435 1.395 1.355 1.895 1.675 1.455 0 0.735 998.180 31 150

4 1.69 1.61 1.53 1.22 1.105 0.99 0.29 0 998.470 25 175

5 3.99 3.91 3.83 1.15 1.105 1.06 0.505 0 998.975 21 196

6 3.18 3.15 3.12 0.87 0.845 0.82 3.065 0 1002.040 9 205

7 2.67 2.645 2.62 0.525 0.51 0.495 2.64 0 1004.680 8 213

8 3.235 3.205 3.175 0.25 0.235 0.22 2.41 0 1007.090 9 222

9 3.94 3.905 3.87 0.33 0.315 0.3 2.89 0 1009.980 11 233

10 3.41 3.375 3.34 0.245 0.225 0.205 3.68 0 1013.660 10 243

11 3.855 3.82 3.785 0.305 0.29 0.275 3.085 0 1016.745 11 254

12 3.55 3.435 3.32 0.61 0.59 0.57 3.23 0 1019.975 59 313

13 3.37 3.31 3.25 1.7 1.52 1.34 1.915 0 1021.890 14 327

14 3.6 3.56 3.52 0.75 0.74 0.73 2.57 0 1024.460 11 338

15 3.485 3.445 3.405 0.585 0.57 0.555 2.99 0 1027.450 12 350

16 3.63 3.59 3.55 0.23 0.21 0.19 3.235 0 1030.685 12 362

17 3.62 3.58 3.54 0.24 0.22 0.2 3.37 0 1034.055 11 373

18 3.545 3.505 3.465 0.24 0.225 0.21 3.355 0 1037.410 14 387

19 3.32 3.275 3.23 0.47 0.44 0.41 3.065 0 1040.475 14 401

20 3.235 3.195 3.155 0.22 0.195 0.17 3.08 0 1043.555 14 415

21 3.455 3.405 3.355 0.27 0.24 0.21 2.955 0 1046.510 14 429

22 3.26 3.21 3.16 0.53 0.51 0.49 2.895 0 1049.405 15 444

23 3.37 3.315 3.26 0.32 0.295 0.27 2.915 0 1052.320 20 464

24 3.81 3.735 3.66 0.46 0.415 0.37 2.9 0 1055.220 22 486

25 3.02 2.97 2.92 0.31 0.275 0.24 3.46 0 1058.680 17 503

26 3.565 3.505 3.445 0.665 0.63 0.595 2.34 0 1061.020 24 527

27 2.915 2.775 2.635 0.395 0.335 0.275 3.17 0 1064.190 37 564

28 3.88 3.805 3.73 0.16 0.115 0.07 2.66 0 1066.850 23 587

29 3.33 3.25 3.18 0.13 0.09 0.05 3.715 0 1070.565 22 609

30 2.8 2.75 2.7 0.52 0.49 0.45 2.76 0 1073.325 17 626

31 2.84 2.82 2.8 0.575 0.54 0.505 2.21 0 1075.535 9 635

32 2.56 2.495 2.43 0.275 0.25 0.225 2.57 0 1078.105 16 651

33 2.78 2.73 2.68 0.235 0.22 0.205 2.275 0 1080.380 18 669

34 3.335 3.305 3.275 0.28 0.24 0.2 2.49 0 1082.870 9 678

35 3.755 3.675 3.595 0.11 0.095 0.08 3.21 0 1086.080 27 705

Page 20: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

20

36 3.145 3.075 3.005 0.2 0.145 0.09 3.53 0 1089.610 26 731

37 1.955 1.855 1.755 0.265 0.205 0.145 2.87 0 1092.480 28 759

38 2.84 2.8 2.76 0.44 0.4 0.36 1.455 0 1093.935 15 774

39 2.95 2.92 2.89 0.325 0.29 0.255 2.51 0 1096.445 10 784

40 2.92 2.89 2.86 0.365 0.345 0.325 2.575 0 1099.020 12 796

41 2.97 2.94 2.91 0.23 0.2 0.17 2.69 0 1101.710 12 808

42 3.185 3.15 3.115 0.1 0.07 0.04 2.87 0 1104.580 13 821

43 3.665 3.615 3.565 0.17 0.14 0.11 3.01 0 1107.590 15 836

44 2.54 2.49 2.44 0.06 0.035 0.01 3.58 0 1111.170 20 856

45 3.42 3.37 3.32 0.46 0.41 0.36 2.08 0 1113.250 14 870

46 3.66 3.63 3.6 0.3 0.28 0.26 3.09 0 1116.340 56 926

47 3.615 3.58 3.545 0.75 0.5 0.25 3.13 0 1119.470 9 935

48 3.38 3.355 3.33 0.23 0.22 0.21 3.36 0 1122.830 12 947

49 3.16 3.115 3.08 0.145 0.11 0.075 3.245 0 1126.075 11 958

50 2.685 2.645 2.605 1.2 1.185 1.17 1.93 0 1128.005 12 970

51 2.89 2.865 2.84 0.22 0.2 0.18 2.445 0 1130.450 8 978

52 2.86 2.845 2.83 0.16 0.145 0.13 2.72 0 1133.170 5.5 983.5

53 3.76 3.705 3.65 0.155 0.145 0.13 2.7 0 1135.870 15 998.5

54 3.99 3.945 3.9 0.31 0.29 0.27 3.415 0 1139.285 14 1012.5

55 3.735 3.69 3.645 0.15 0.125 0.1 3.82 0 1143.105 12 1024.5

56 3.735 3.695 3.655 0.42 0.405 0.39 3.285 0 1146.390 10 1034.5

57 3.9 3.865 3.83 0.455 0.445 0.435 3.25 0 1149.640 10 1044.5

58 3.025 3 2.975 0.37 0.355 0.34 3.51 0 1153.150 10 1054.5

59 3.795 3.77 3.745 0.165 0.14 0.115 2.86 0 1156.010 9 1063.5

60 2.63 2.615 2.6 0.14 0.12 0.1 3.65 0 1159.660 6 1069.5

61 3.95 3.915 3.88 0.11 0.095 0.08 2.52 0 1162.180 11 1080.5

62 3.37 3.34 3.31 0.24 0.22 0.2 3.695 0 1165.875 9 1089.5

63 3.625 3.59 3.555 0.19 0.175 0.16 3.165 0 1169.040 12 1101.5

64 3.985 3.935 3.885 0.24 0.215 0.19 3.375 0 1172.415 15 1116.5

65 3.615 3.53 3.445 0.085 0.06 0.035 3.875 0 1176.290 22 1138.5

66 3.83 3.795 3.76 0.09 0.065 0.04 3.465 0 1179.755 10 1148.5

67 3.41 3.38 3.35 0.2 0.185 0.17 3.61 0 1183.365 10 1158.5

68 3.465 3.43 3.395 0.1 0.08 0.06 3.3 0 1186.665 10 1168.5

69 3.835 3.795 3.755 0.23 0.215 0.2 3.215 0 1189.880 11 1179.5

70 3.36 3.335 3.31 0.11 0.095 0.08 3.7 0 1193.580 10 1189.5

71 3.39 3.345 3.3 0.075 0.05 0.025 3.285 0 1196.865 15 1204.5

72 3.715 3.675 3.635 0.11 0.08 0.05 3.265 0 1200.130 12 1216.5

73 3.815 3.77 3.725 0.205 0.185 0.165 3.49 0 1203.620 14 1230.5

74 3.3 3.255 3.21 0.195 0.17 0.145 3.6 0 1207.220 18 1248.5

75 3.055 2.96 2.865 0.285 0.24 0.195 3.015 0 1210.235 25 1273.5

76 3.665 3.64 3.615 0.25 0.22 0.19 2.74 0 1212.975 9 1282.5

Page 21: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

21

77 3.57 3.54 3.51 0.255 0.235 0.215 3.405 0 1216.380 20 1302.5

78 0.31 0.24 0.17 0.53 0.46 0.39 3.08 0 1219.460 47 1349.5

79 1.525 1.405 1.285 2.165 2 1.835 0 1.76 1217.700 45 1394.5

80 2.995 2.93 2.865 0.3 0.195 0.09 1.21 0 1218.910 34 1428.5

81 3.04 2.93 2.82 0.68 0.575 0.47 2.355 0 1221.265 28 1456.5

82 3.655 3.62 3.585 0.215 0.185 0.155 2.745 0 1224.010 12 1468.5

83 3.625 3.585 3.545 0.15 0.125 0.1 3.495 0 1227.505 24 1492.5

84 2 1.865 1.73 1.165 1.085 1.005 2.5 0 1230.005 45 1537.5

85 2.82 2.685 2.55 0.39 0.3 0.21 1.565 0 1231.570 53 1590.5

86 0.495 0.435 0.375 0.97 0.84 0.71 1.845 0 1233.415 29 1619.5

87 0.46 0.385 0.31 3.55 3.465 3.38 0 3.03 1230.385 23 1642.5

88 0.36 0.34 0.32 3.85 3.81 3.77 0 3.425 1226.960 10 1652.5

89 0.34 0.32 0.3 2.73 2.7 2.67 0 2.36 1224.600 19 1671.5

90 0.66 0.625 0.59 3.775 3.7 3.625 0 3.38 1221.220 17 1688.5

91 3.39 3.34 3.29 0 2.715 1218.505 1688.5

TOT 268.72 50.215 236.995 18.49 1689

WL 4.155 4.105 4.055 19.255 1217.735 218.7 Gross

ARITHMETIC CHECK

BM

ΣB.S.-ΣF.S 218.51 ΣRISE -ΣFALL 218.505 218.505

Page 22: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

22

8.2 HEIGHT DIFFERENCE FROM DAM SITE TO POWERHOUSE

WL BM 0.77

SN BS FS RISE FALL RL HD CD

T M B T M B 999.23

1 3.39 3.34 3.29 1000 14 14

2 2.89 2.81 2.73 0.585 0.565 0.545 2.775 0 1002.775 19 33

3 3.25 3.2 3.15 0.19 0.175 0.16 2.635 0 1005.41 14 47

4 3.805 3.765 3.725 0.2 0.18 0.16 3.02 0 1008.43 23 70

5 0.375 0.245 0.115 0.28 0.205 0.13 3.56 0 1011.99 32 102

6 2.59 2.525 2.46 0.485 0.455 0.425 0 0.21 1011.78 36 138

7 0.9 0.785 0.67 2.87 2.755 2.64 0 0.23 1011.55 49 187

8 1.31 1.22 1.13 2.97 2.84 2.71 0 2.055 1009.495 39 226

9 0.475 0.45 0.425 3.755 3.65 3.545 0 2.43 1007.065 13 239

10 0.24 0.22 0.2 3.755 3.715 3.675 0 3.265 1003.8 24 263

11 0.95 0.87 0.79 3.34 3.24 3.14 0 3.02 1000.78 28 291

12 0.35 0.3 0.25 2.38 2.32 2.26 0 1.45 999.33 33 324

13 1.44 1.36 1.28 2.675 2.56 2.445 0 2.26 997.07 40 364

14 2.9 2.775 2.65 1.34 1.22 1.1 0.14 0 997.21 47 411

15 0.55 0.53 0.51 3.98 3.87 3.76 0 1.095 996.115 8.5 419.5

16 0.56 0.545 0.53 3.745 3.725 3.7 0 3.195 992.92 19 438.5

17 0.845 0.805 0.765 2.945 2.865 2.785 0 2.32 990.6 21 459.5

18 0.95 0.93 0.91 1.13 1.115 1 0 0.31 990.29 14 473.5

19 0.4 0.205 0.17 2.84 2.79 2.74 0 1.86 988.43 30 503.5

20 0.895 0.875 0.855 3.665 3.63 3.595 0 3.425 985.005 15 518.5

21 0.085 0.055 0.025 3.76 3.705 3.65 0 2.83 982.175 15 533.5

22 0.455 0.435 0.415 3.54 3.435 3.45 0 3.38 978.795 13 546.5

23 0.43 0.41 0.39 3.87 3.825 3.78 0 3.39 975.405 9.001 555.5

24 0.3 0.28 0.26 3.575 3.55 3.525 0 3.14 972.265 12 567.5

25 0.26 0.245 0.23 3.765 3.75 3.685 0 3.47 968.795 10 577.5

26 0.49 0.47 0.45 3.56 3.525 3.49 0 3.28 965.515 11 588.5

27 0.205 0.18 0.155 3.795 3.76 3.725 0 3.29 962.225 12 600.5

28 0.31 0.29 0.27 2.805 2.77 2.735 0 2.59 959.635 11 611.5

29 1.04 1 0.96 3.54 3.505 3.47 0 3.215 956.42 18 629.5

30 0.44 0.425 0.41 3.31 3.26 3.21 0 2.26 954.16 11 640.5

31 0.09 0.065 0.04 3.51 3.47 3.43 0 3.045 951.115 12 652.5

32 0.5 0.485 0.47 3.955 3.92 3.885 0 3.855 947.26 10 662.5

33 0.135 0.115 0.095 3.655 3.62 3.585 0 3.135 944.125 9 671.5

34 0.22 0.2 0.18 3.73 3.705 3.68 0 3.59 940.535 10 681.5

35 0.39 0.37 0.35 3.41 3.38 3.35 0 3.18 937.355 9.001 690.5

36 0.17 0.15 0.13 3.14 3.115 3.09 0 2.745 934.61 11 701.5

37 0.31 0.29 0.27 3.82 3.785 3.75 0 3.635 930.975 9.001 710.5

Page 23: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

23

38 0.365 0.345 0.325 3.62 3.595 3.57 0 3.305 927.67 12 722.5

39 0.36 0.345 0.33 3.5 3.46 3.42 0 3.115 924.555 12 734.5

40 0.64 0.625 0.61 3.43 3.385 3.34 0 3.04 921.515 11 745.5

41 0.24 0.23 0.22 3.72 3.68 3.64 0 3.055 918.46 9.001 754.5

42 0.75 0.735 0.72 3.93 3.895 3.86 0 3.665 914.795 7.001 761.5

43 0.54 0.525 0.51 3.5 3.48 3.46 0 2.745 912.05 11 772.5

44 0.52 0.485 0.45 3.75 3.71 3.67 0 3.185 908.865 17 789.5

45 0.35 0.305 0.26 2.49 2.44 2.39 0 1.955 906.91 15 804.5

46 0.405 0.395 0.385 3.83 3.8 3.77 0 3.495 903.415 9.001 813.5

47 0.52 0.51 0.5 3.66 3.625 3.59 0 3.23 900.185 10 823.5

48 0.66 0.65 0.64 3.65 3.61 3.57 0 3.1 897.085 9 832.5

49 0.6 0.575 0.55 3.435 3.4 3.365 0 2.75 894.335 22 854.5

50 0.48 0.455 0.43 3.515 3.43 3.345 0 2.855 891.48 14 868.5

51 0.57 0.545 0.52 3.605 3.56 3.515 0 3.105 888.375 14 882.5

52 0.78 0.745 0.71 3.55 3.505 3.46 0 2.96 885.415 16 898.5

53 0.755 0.735 0.715 3.64 3.595 3.55 0 2.85 882.565 12 910.5

54 0.45 0.43 0.41 3.67 3.63 3.59 0 2.895 879.67 12 922.5

55 0.48 0.44 0.44 3.95 3.91 3.87 0 3.48 876.19 17 939.5

56 1.195 1.105 1.015 3.64 3.575 3.51 0 3.135 873.055 32 971.5

57 0.65 0.6 0.55 2.885 2.815 2.745 0 1.71 871.345 24 995.5

58 0.36 0.325 0.29 3.09 3.02 2.95 0 2.42 868.925 21 1017

59 0.125 0.105 0.085 3.83 3.76 3.69 0 3.435 865.49 14 1031

60 0.765 0.745 0.725 3.795 3.745 3.695 0 3.64 861.85 21.5 1052

61 0.565 0.55 0.535 3.7 3.615 3.525 0 2.87 858.98 8.001 1060

62 0.585 0.555 0.525 2.785 2.76 2.735 0 2.21 856.77 22 1082

63 0.565 0.535 0.505 3.96 3.88 3.8 0 3.325 853.445 15 1097

64 0.7 0.68 0.66 2.945 2.9 2.855 0 2.365 851.08 18 1115

65 0.955 0.93 0.905 3.42 3.35 3.28 0 2.67 848.41 17 1132

66 0.91 0.87 0.83 3.67 3.61 3.55 0 2.68 845.73 32 1164

67 0.82 0.78 0.74 2.76 2.64 2.52 0 1.77 843.96 22 1186

68 0.555 0.51 0.465 3.83 3.76 3.69 0 2.98 840.98 23 1209

69 0.21 0.165 0.12 0.905 0.835 0.765 0 0.325 840.655 26 1235

70 0.56 0.535 0.51 3.775 3.695 3.605 0 3.53 837.125 18 1253

71 0.48 0.46 0.44 3.9 3.835 3.77 0 3.3 833.825 12 1265

72 0.325 0.295 0.265 3.24 3.2 3.16 0 2.74 831.085 14 1279

73 0.53 0.51 0.49 3.465 3.425 3.385 0 3.13 827.955 13 1292

74 0.525 0.505 0.485 3.48 3.435 3.39 0 2.925 825.03 15 1307

75 0.36 0.34 0.32 3.72 3.665 3.61 0 3.16 821.87 13 1320

76 0.56 0.54 0.52 3.99 3.945 3.9 0 3.605 818.265 9 1329

77 0.3 0.28 0.26 2.885 2.86 2.835 0 2.32 815.945 13 1342

78 0.5 0.485 0.47 3.81 3.765 3.72 0 3.485 812.46 13 1355

Page 24: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

24

79 0.645 0.625 0.605 3.98 3.93 3.88 0 3.445 809.015 12 1367

80 0.57 0.54 0.51 3.37 3.33 3.29 0 2.705 806.31 29 1396

81 0.85 0.735 0.62 1.35 1.235 1.12 0 0.695 805.615 39 1435

82 0.62 0.6 0.58 3.45 3.37 3.29 0 2.635 802.98 12 1447

83 0.4 0.385 0.37 3.76 3.72 3.68 0 3.12 799.86 12 1459

84 0.53 0.52 0.51 3.855 3.81 3.765 0 3.425 796.435 8 1467

85 0.42 0.4 0.38 3.8 3.77 3.74 0 3.25 793.185 12 1479

86 0.735 0.73 0.725 3.795 3.755 3.715 0 3.355 789.83 2.001 1481

87 0.4 0.39 0.38 3.665 3.625 3.655 0 2.895 786.935 17 1498

88 0.285 0.255 0.225 3.655 3.58 3.505 0 3.19 783.745 34 1532

89 1.21 1.1 0.99 3.3 3.16 3.02 0 2.905 780.84 42 1574

90 1.69 1.405 1.12 1.26 1.16 1.06 0 0.06 780.78 76 1650

91 2.53 2.42 2.316 1.175 1.08 0.985 0.325 0 781.105 41.4 1691

92 1.25 1.15 1.05 1.27 0 782.375

TOTAL 64.805 282.43 13.725 231.35 1691

WL 2.26 2.16 2.06 0.26

12.715 781.49 217.7

ARITHMETIC CHECK

ΣB.S.-ΣF.S 217.625 ΣRISE -ΣFALL 217.625

Page 25: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

25

8.3 CORRECTION BY BOWDITCH’S METHOD

RISE(m) FALL(m) RL(m) correction

adjusted

RL distance(m) C.D.

1000 0 1000.000 0 0

0 1.085 998.915 0.000355 998.915 30 30

0 0.735 998.18 0.001408 998.179 89 119

0.29 0 998.47 0.001775 998.468 31 150

0.505 0 998.975 0.002071 998.973 25 175

3.065 0 1002.04 0.00232 1002.038 21 196

2.64 0 1004.68 0.002426 1004.678 9 205

2.41 0 1007.09 0.002521 1007.087 8 213

2.89 0 1009.98 0.002627 1009.977 9 222

3.68 0 1013.66 0.002757 1013.657 11 233

3.085 0 1016.745 0.002876 1016.742 10 243

3.23 0 1019.975 0.003006 1019.972 11 254

1.915 0 1021.89 0.003704 1021.886 59 313

2.57 0 1024.46 0.00387 1024.456 14 327

2.99 0 1027.45 0.004 1027.446 11 338

3.235 0 1030.685 0.004142 1030.681 12 350

3.37 0 1034.055 0.004284 1034.051 12 362

3.355 0 1037.41 0.004414 1037.406 11 373

3.065 0 1040.475 0.00458 1040.470 14 387

3.08 0 1043.555 0.004746 1043.550 14 401

2.955 0 1046.51 0.004911 1046.505 14 415

2.895 0 1049.405 0.005077 1049.400 14 429

2.915 0 1052.32 0.005255 1052.315 15 444

2.9 0 1055.22 0.005491 1055.215 20 464

3.46 0 1058.68 0.005752 1058.674 22 486

2.34 0 1061.02 0.005953 1061.014 17 503

3.17 0 1064.19 0.006237 1064.184 24 527

2.66 0 1066.85 0.006675 1066.843 37 564

3.715 0 1070.565 0.006947 1070.558 23 587

2.76 0 1073.325 0.007207 1073.318 22 609

2.21 0 1075.535 0.007408 1075.528 17 626

2.57 0 1078.105 0.007515 1078.097 9 635

2.275 0 1080.38 0.007704 1080.372 16 651

2.49 0 1082.87 0.007917 1082.862 18 669

3.21 0 1086.08 0.008024 1086.072 9 678

3.53 0 1089.61 0.008343 1089.602 27 705

2.87 0 1092.48 0.008651 1092.471 26 731

1.455 0 1093.935 0.008982 1093.926 28 759

Page 26: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

26

2.51 0 1096.445 0.00916 1096.436 15 774

2.575 0 1099.02 0.009278 1099.011 10 784

2.69 0 1101.71 0.00942 1101.701 12 796

2.87 0 1104.58 0.009562 1104.570 12 808

3.01 0 1107.59 0.009716 1107.580 13 821

3.58 0 1111.17 0.009894 1111.160 15 836

2.08 0 1113.25 0.01013 1113.240 20 856

3.09 0 1116.34 0.010296 1116.330 14 870

3.13 0 1119.47 0.010959 1119.459 56 926

3.36 0 1122.83 0.011065 1122.819 9 935

3.245 0 1126.075 0.011207 1126.064 12 947

1.93 0 1128.005 0.011338 1127.994 11 958

2.445 0 1130.45 0.01148 1130.439 12 970

2.72 0 1133.17 0.011574 1133.158 8 978

2.7 0 1135.87 0.011639 1135.858 5.5 983.5

3.415 0 1139.285 0.011817 1139.273 15 998.5

3.82 0 1143.105 0.011983 1143.093 14 1012.5

3.285 0 1146.39 0.012125 1146.378 12 1024.5

3.25 0 1149.64 0.012243 1149.628 10 1034.5

3.51 0 1153.15 0.012361 1153.138 10 1044.5

2.86 0 1156.01 0.01248 1155.998 10 1054.5

3.65 0 1159.66 0.012586 1159.647 9 1063.5

2.52 0 1162.18 0.012657 1162.167 6 1069.5

3.695 0 1165.875 0.012787 1165.862 11 1080.5

3.165 0 1169.04 0.012894 1169.027 9 1089.5

3.375 0 1172.415 0.013036 1172.402 12 1101.5

3.875 0 1176.29 0.013213 1176.277 15 1116.5

3.465 0 1179.755 0.013474 1179.742 22 1138.5

3.61 0 1183.365 0.013592 1183.351 10 1148.5

3.3 0 1186.665 0.01371 1186.651 10 1158.5

3.215 0 1189.88 0.013829 1189.866 10 1168.5

3.7 0 1193.58 0.013959 1193.566 11 1179.5

3.285 0 1196.865 0.014077 1196.851 10 1189.5

3.265 0 1200.13 0.014255 1200.116 15 1204.5

3.49 0 1203.62 0.014397 1203.606 12 1216.5

3.6 0 1207.22 0.014563 1207.205 14 1230.5

3.015 0 1210.235 0.014776 1210.220 18 1248.5

2.74 0 1212.975 0.015071 1212.960 25 1273.5

3.405 0 1216.38 0.015178 1216.365 9 1282.5

3.08 0 1219.46 0.015415 1219.445 20 1302.5

0 1.76 1217.7 0.015971 1217.684 47 1349.5

Page 27: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

27

1.21 0 1218.91 0.016503 1218.893 45 1394.5

2.355 0 1221.265 0.016906 1221.248 34 1428.5

2.745 0 1224.01 0.017237 1223.993 28 1456.5

3.495 0 1227.505 0.017379 1227.488 12 1468.5

2.5 0 1230.005 0.017663 1229.987 24 1492.5

1.565 0 1231.57 0.018196 1231.552 45 1537.5

1.845 0 1233.415 0.018823 1233.396 53 1590.5

0 3.03 1230.385 0.019166 1230.366 29 1619.5

0 3.425 1226.96 0.019438 1226.941 23 1642.5

0 2.36 1224.6 0.019557 1224.580 10 1652.5

0 3.38 1221.22 0.019782 1221.200 19 1671.5

0 2.715 1218.505 0.019983 1218.485 17 1688.5

2.775 0 1221.28 0.020148 1221.260 14 1702.5

2.635 0 1223.915 0.020373 1223.895 19 1721.5

3.02 0 1226.935 0.020539 1226.914 14 1735.5

3.56 0 1230.495 0.020811 1230.474 23 1758.5

0 0.21 1230.285 0.02119 1230.264 32 1790.5

0 0.23 1230.055 0.021616 1230.033 36 1826.5

0 2.055 1228 0.022196 1227.978 49 1875.5

0 2.43 1225.57 0.022657 1225.547 39 1914.5

0 3.265 1222.305 0.022811 1222.282 13 1927.5

0 3.02 1219.285 0.023095 1219.262 24 1951.5

0 1.45 1217.835 0.023427 1217.812 28 1979.5

0 2.26 1215.575 0.023817 1215.551 33 2012.5

0.14 0 1215.715 0.024291 1215.691 40 2052.5

0 1.095 1214.62 0.024847 1214.595 47 2099.5

0 3.195 1211.425 0.024947 1211.400 8.5 2108

0 2.32 1209.105 0.025172 1209.080 19 2127

0 0.31 1208.795 0.025421 1208.770 21 2148

0 1.86 1206.935 0.025586 1206.909 14 2162

0 3.425 1203.51 0.025942 1203.484 30 2192

0 2.83 1200.68 0.026119 1200.654 15 2207

0 3.38 1197.3 0.026297 1197.274 15 2222

0 3.39 1193.91 0.02645 1193.884 13 2235

0 3.14 1190.77 0.026557 1190.743 9.001 2244.001

0 3.47 1187.3 0.026699 1187.273 12 2256.001

0 3.28 1184.02 0.026817 1183.993 10 2266.001

0 3.29 1180.73 0.026947 1180.703 11 2277.001

0 2.59 1178.14 0.02709 1178.113 12 2289.001

0 3.215 1174.925 0.02722 1174.898 11 2300.001

0 2.26 1172.665 0.027433 1172.638 18 2318.001

Page 28: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

28

0 3.045 1169.62 0.027563 1169.592 11 2329.001

0 3.855 1165.765 0.027705 1165.737 12 2341.001

0 3.135 1162.63 0.027823 1162.602 10 2351.001

0 3.59 1159.04 0.02793 1159.012 9 2360.001

0 3.18 1155.86 0.028048 1155.832 10 2370.001

0 2.745 1153.115 0.028155 1153.087 9.001 2379.002

0 3.635 1149.48 0.028285 1149.452 11 2390.002

0 3.305 1146.175 0.028391 1146.147 9.001 2399.003

0 3.115 1143.06 0.028533 1143.031 12 2411.003

0 3.04 1140.02 0.028675 1139.991 12 2423.003

0 3.055 1136.965 0.028806 1136.936 11 2434.003

0 3.665 1133.3 0.028912 1133.271 9.001 2443.004

0 2.745 1130.555 0.028995 1130.526 7.001 2450.005

0 3.185 1127.37 0.029125 1127.341 11 2461.005

0 1.955 1125.415 0.029326 1125.386 17 2478.005

0 3.495 1121.92 0.029504 1121.890 15 2493.005

0 3.23 1118.69 0.02961 1118.660 9.001 2502.006

0 3.1 1115.59 0.029729 1115.560 10 2512.006

0 2.75 1112.84 0.029835 1112.810 9 2521.006

0 2.855 1109.985 0.030096 1109.955 22 2543.006

0 3.105 1106.88 0.030261 1106.850 14 2557.006

0 2.96 1103.92 0.030427 1103.890 14 2571.006

0 2.85 1101.07 0.030616 1101.039 16 2587.006

0 2.895 1098.175 0.030758 1098.144 12 2599.006

0 3.48 1094.695 0.0309 1094.664 12 2611.006

0 3.135 1091.56 0.031102 1091.529 17 2628.006

0 1.71 1089.85 0.03148 1089.819 32 2660.006

0 2.42 1087.43 0.031764 1087.398 24 2684.006

0 3.435 1083.995 0.032013 1083.963 21 2705.006

0 3.64 1080.355 0.032178 1080.323 14 2719.006

0 2.87 1077.485 0.032433 1077.453 21.5 2740.506

0 2.21 1075.275 0.032528 1075.242 8.001 2748.507

0 3.325 1071.95 0.032788 1071.917 22 2770.507

0 2.365 1069.585 0.032965 1069.552 15 2785.507

0 2.67 1066.915 0.033179 1066.882 18 2803.507

0 2.68 1064.235 0.03338 1064.202 17 2820.507

0 1.77 1062.465 0.033758 1062.431 32 2852.507

0 2.98 1059.485 0.034019 1059.451 22 2874.507

0 0.325 1059.16 0.034291 1059.126 23 2897.507

0 3.53 1055.63 0.034599 1055.595 26 2923.507

0 3.3 1052.33 0.034812 1052.295 18 2941.507

Page 29: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

29

0 2.74 1049.59 0.034954 1049.555 12 2953.507

0 3.13 1046.46 0.035119 1046.425 14 2967.507

0 2.925 1043.535 0.035273 1043.500 13 2980.507

0 3.16 1040.375 0.035451 1040.340 15 2995.507

0 3.605 1036.77 0.035605 1036.734 13 3008.507

0 2.32 1034.45 0.035711 1034.414 9 3017.507

0 3.485 1030.965 0.035865 1030.929 13 3030.507

0 3.445 1027.52 0.036019 1027.484 13 3043.507

0 2.705 1024.815 0.036161 1024.779 12 3055.507

0 0.695 1024.12 0.036504 1024.083 29 3084.507

0 2.635 1021.485 0.036966 1021.448 39 3123.507

0 3.12 1018.365 0.037108 1018.328 12 3135.507

0 3.465 1014.9 0.03725 1014.863 12 3147.507

0 3.25 1011.65 0.037344 1011.613 8 3155.507

0 3.555 1008.095 0.037486 1008.058 12 3167.507

0 2.895 1005.2 0.03751 1005.162 2.001 3169.508

0 3.19 1002.01 0.037711 1001.972 17 3186.508

0 3.505 998.505 0.038114 998.467 34 3220.508

0 0.06 998.445 0.038611 998.406 42 3262.508

0.325 0 998.77 0.03951 998.730 76 3338.508

1.27 0 1000.0400 0.04 1000.000 41.4 3379.908

difference 0.0400 M 3379.908

40 Mm k 3.3799

permissable error 45.96 Mm

Therefore, the head was found to be 218.635 meters.

Page 30: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

30

9. FIELD MEASUREMENT OF DISCHARGE

9.1 Determination of Cross Section Two Cross sections of the river were taken. Breadth of the river (length perpendicular to the span of river)

and depth at every 1m gap were taken.

Section A-A

Distance(m) RL

depth

(m)

Distance X

Depth

0 100.596 -0.049 0.0965

1 100.501 -0.144 0.164

2 100.461 -0.184 0.2545

3 100.320 -0.325 0.37

4 100.230 -0.415 0.4095

5 100.241 -0.404 0.231

6 100.587 -0.058 0.029

7 100.645 0.000 0.09106

8.256 100.500 -0.145

∑ 1.64556

Figure 6 Cross Section A-A of river

Page 31: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

31

Section B-B

Distance(m) RL(m) Depth(m)

Distance X

Depth

0 99.960 0.000 0.041

1 99.878 -0.082 0.127

2 99.788 -0.172 0.182

3 99.768 -0.192 0.212

4 99.728 -0.232 0.356

5 99.480 -0.480 0.3295

6 99.781 -0.179 0.19764

7.22 99.815 -0.145

∑ 1.44514

Figure 7 Cross Section B-B of River

9.2 Determination of Velocity Current meter could not be used to measure velocity of the river since the depth was too less. Therefore,

float method was applied.

Distance(m) Time taken (sec) Velocity(m/s)

Section A-A

2.9 2.59 1.120

2.9 3.81 0.761

2.9 4.5 0.644

AVG 0.842

Section B-B

5 10 0.500

5 6.29 0.795

5 6.6 0.758

AVG 0.684

Page 32: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

32

9.3 Discharge Discharge = Cross Section Area X Velocity

Discharge at Section A-A = 1.64556 X 0.684 = 1.1256 m3/s

Discharge at Section B-B = 1.44514 X 0.842 = 1.2168 m3/s

Average = 1.171 m3/s

9.4 Measurement of discharge from canal Width = 0.6 m

Wetted depth = 0.3 m

Wetted area = 0.18

Distance(m) Time taken (sec) Velocity(m/s)

13 7.84 1.658

13 7.66 1.697

13 8.57 1.517

13 7.83 1.660

13 8.87 1.466

AVG 1.600

Page 33: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

33

9.5 Flow Duration Curve

9.5.1 MIP METHOD

Using MIP method to get discharge values for Flow Duration Curve

Month of Field observation of discharge = November = 1.171 m3/s

Converting this into discharge at April 15 = 0.234 m3/s

Months Factor Discharge(m3

/s)

January 2.71 0.635

February 1.88 0.440

March 1.38 0.323

April 1 0.234

May 1.88 0.440

June 3.13 0.733

July 13.54 3.172

August 25 5.856

September 20.83 4.879

October 10.42 2.441

November 5 1.171

December 3.75 0.878

Page 34: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

34

9.5.2 Flow Duration Curve

Rank

Probality of

exceedence % Discharge (m3

/s)

1 8.333 5.856

2 16.667 4.879

3 25.000 3.172

4 33.333 2.441

5 41.667 1.171

6 50.000 0.878

7 58.333 0.733

8 66.667 0.635

9 75.000 0.440

10 83.333 0.440

11 91.667 0.323

12 100.000 0.234

Figure 8 Flow Duration Curve

By interpolation, Q65 =0.654 m3/s

Page 35: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

35

9.6 TOTAL DISCHARGE

Total Discharge that can be utilized

= Discharge from river + 2 canals

= 0.654 + 0.216 + 0.216 m3/s

=1.086 m3/s

Page 36: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

36

10. FINDING HYDROPOWER POTENTIAL USING OBTAINED FIELD INFORMATION

10.1 Design of penstock for that hydropower potential

Using USBR formula,

Veco=0.125√2gH = 8.187 m/sec

D=√(4Q/πv) = 0.411 m

Using Sarkaria Formula,

Power (P) = γQHη = 1980.6 kW = 2654.96 HP

D = 0.62 P0.35= 0.295 m

H0.65

From JNN Guidelines,

D=√5.2Q3

H

7 = 0.61 m

Pressure inside Penstock (p) = ρg (H+H0) where, Dynamic head (H0)= v2/2g

Therefore, ρg (H+H0) = 22.2051 kg/cm2

t= pD/2σaη + ε (ε: Corrosion allowance 0.2 cm)

= 0.861 cm

As per ASME code:

t= pR/(σaη-0.6 p) + 0.15 = 0.82 cm

tmin= D/ 288 = 0.211 cm

tmin= (D+200)/400 = 0.652 cm

Page 37: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

37

10.2 Penstock Alignment

Due to lack of topographic map of the exact location and scale of Sundarijal HPP available to us, we used a

Google Maps service provided by Google Inc. as it readily provides satellite images and elevation contours.

The aim of taking this image is to get an idea of the length of the penstock that can be put so as to check the

hydropower potential of the river. The accuracy of this method can be in doubt however, the scope is to find

the length only so it is preferable.

Figure 9 Penstock Alignment

The alignment is shown by the straight lines enclosed within small square boxes. The total length of the

alignment was found to be 1.41 km.

Page 38: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

38

10.3 Calculation of major and minor losses

10.3.1 Calculation of friction factor Relative roughness = 0.00004167

Reynold’s number (Re) = ρvD/μ = 2.263x106

From Moody Chart, friction factor (f) = 0.0116

Figure 10 Moody Diagram

Page 39: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

39

10.3.1 Calculation of head loss

• Major loss (Darcy Wiesbach Formula)

fLv2/2gD

= 19.149 m

• Minor loss

(v2/2g) (kentrance+kbend+kexit)

= 1.268 m

Total loss (HL) = 19.149+1.268 = 20.417 m

10.4 REMARKS

Taking losses into account, Power = γQη(H-HL) = 1795.65 kW ~1.8 MW

(taking overall efficiency of turbine and generator 85%)

This power is calculated using Q65

Whereas Q40 is used in the original design and it produced 1.24 MW

REMARKS: The HPP still has more potential.

Page 40: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

40

11 CALCULATION OF FIRM POWER AND SECONDARY POWER Table 1 Calculation of power and

energy Calculate the wet firm and secondary power and energy

Calculate the dry firm and secondary power and energy

Design QD at

Wet period Dry period

Q65%

M No. of days

Flow m3/s

m3/s Power [kW] Energy [kWh]

Firm Sec Firm Sec Firm Sec Firm Sec

Pow. [kW] Pow. [kW] Ener [kWh]. Ener. [kWh]

Pow. [kW]

Pow. [kW]

Ener. [kWh]

Ener. [kWh]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

J 31 0.63 1.04 1720.76 1280243.12 1060.17

660.58 788769.01

491474.11

F 28 0.44 0.85 1400.12 940882.51 1060.17

339.95 712436.52

228445.98

M 31 0.32 0.73 1206.97 897985.46 1060.17

146.80 788769.01

109216.45

A 30 0.23 0.64 1060.17 763324.82 1060.17 0.00 763324.85 0.00

M 31 0.44 0.85 1400.12 1041691.35 1060.17 339.95 788769.01 252922.34

J 30 0.65 1.06 1752.45 1261764.39 1060.17 692.28 763324.85 498439.55

J 31 0.65 1.06 1752.45 1303823.21 1060.17 692.28 788769.01 515054.20

A 31 0.65 1.06 1752.45 1303823.21 1060.17 692.28 788769.01 515054.20

S 30 0.65 1.06 1752.45 1261764.39 1060.17 692.28 763324.85 498439.55

O 31 0.65 1.06 1752.45 1303823.21 1060.17 692.28 788769.01 515054.20

N 30 0.65 1.06 1752.45 1261764.39 1060.17 692.28 763324.85 498439.55

D 31 0.65 1.06 1752.45 1303823.21 1060.17

692.28 515054.20

788769.01

J 365 13924713.25

8481.39 4493.61 6208375.43 3293403.56

4240.69

1839.61 2805028.74

1617905.55

Page 41: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

41

REMARKS:

1 Installed Capacity Pinst, kW 1933.36

2 Firm Capacity, Pfirm, kW 1169.62

3 Total Wet Energy [kWh] 9501778.99

4 Total Dry Energy [kWh] 4422934.29

5 Annual Energy Consumed [kWh] 13924713.28

6 Total Annual Energy Could be Produced [kWh] 16936224.31

7 Annual Plant Factor 0.8222

8 Annual Load Factor 0.8222

9 Annual Utilization Factor 1

10 Total cost of Hydropower 290003841

11 Total annual benefit from hydropower 82761187.2

12 Total annual cost of hydropower installation and operat. for 30 years 30740407.14

13 Benefit -cost ratio 2.6923

14 Your candid conclusion Economically Feasible

(Taking the cost of hydropower into annuity taking interest is equal to 10)

Page 42: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

42

12. CALCULATION OF FLOW MASS CURVE

S.N. Months Factor Discharge(m3/s) Days Volume (m3/day)

Cumulative volume (m3-

day)

1 January 2.71 0.635 31 19.678 19.678

2 February 1.88 0.440 28 12.330 32.008

3 March 1.38 0.323 31 10.021 42.029

4 April 1 0.234 30 7.027 49.056

5 May 1.88 0.440 31 13.651 62.708

6 June 3.13 0.733 30 21.995 84.702

7 July 13.54 3.172 31 98.319 183.021

8 August 25 5.856 31 181.534 364.555

9 September 20.83 4.879 30 146.375 510.930

10 October 10.42 2.441 31 75.663 586.593

11 November 5 1.171 30 35.136 621.728

12 December 3.75 0.878 31 27.230 648.959

Figure 11 Flow Mass Curve

From the curve plotted, it is assumed that the reservoir is full at the beginning of a dry period i.e. when

the inflow rate is less than the demand rate, the maximum amount of water drawn from the storage is the

cumulative difference between supply and demand volumes from the beginning of the dry season.

Therefore the storage required, S = Maximum of ∑Vd - ∑Vs where, Vd is Demand Volume and Vs is

supply volume.

The estimated capacity for which the reservoir is to be designed is 84 cumec-day

i.e 84 X 24 X 60 X60 = 7.256 million cubic meter per second.

13 .DESIGN OF SUPPORT PIER

13.1 Design Support piers are required along the straight sections of exposed penstock between anchor blocks. The

maximum spacing of support piers to avoid overstressing the pipe is generally 5.

Design considerations:

1. Component of the weight of pipe and enclosed water

2. Frictional force of pipe on support piers

3. Force on the anchor blocks on support piers due to the soil pressure acting on the upstream face

Factors not included in the design:

1. Since there is only one minor bend, the hydrostatic pressure within the bend was neglected.

2. Thermal expansion and contraction effects.

Page 43: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

43

3. Pipe diameter reduction

To find total force acting on support piers:

Span of penstock supported by support pier = 5m

Internal Diameter of penstock = 0.6m

Thickness of penstock = 9.00mm

Thickness of saddle plate = 18.00mm

Density of steel taken = 8050 kg/m3

Density of water = 1000 kg/m3

Span of steel saddle plate resting on pier = 1.12m + 0.5d + 0.5d = 2.12 m

Weight in kilograms = Density X Volume

Wpenstock= 8050 X 5 X (2 π r X t) =683.1 kg

Wsaddle= 8050 X (1.25 X π r X 2t) = 235.17 kg

Wwater enclosed = 5 X π r2 X 1000 = 1414.286 kg

Total Force due to weight of penstock, saddle and water enclosed, F1=2332.56kg

Friction co-efficient, f = 0.57

Frictional force, F2=fXF1=1329.557706

Unit weight of soil = 16 kN/m3

Friction angle, ø = 22°

Thrust acting on the face of pier, F4= 153.34 kg

Weight of pier, F3= 19224.99 kg

This weight is calculated after determining the dimension of the pier.

Page 44: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

44

Figure 12 Cross Section of Penstock

Page 45: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

45

Figure 13 Support pier elevation with saddle and penstock

Page 46: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

46

Figure 14 Cross section of penstock resting on support pier

Page 47: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

47

After several iteration, the following dimension yield safe remarks on all three checks.

L = 2.2m, B = 2.0 m, H = 2m,

Sum of moments about bottom right end of the pier, ∑M = 23595.33 kg m

Sum of vertical forces,∑V =21299.30 kg

Sum of horizontal forces, ∑H = 1150.90 kg

13.2 Stability Analysis Checking of conditions of stability is required and an iterative process was done to determine the safe

dimension of support pier.

SAFETY ON OVERTURNING

The forces acting on the structure should not overturn the block. For structures that have rectangular

bases, this condition is met if the resultant acts within the middle third of the base.

Distance at which the resultant acts, d= ∑M / ∑V = 1.11 m

where,

∑M = sum of moments acting about the chosen point of the block

Eccentricity, e = │0.5 L - d│ < allowable eccentricity = L/6 i.e 0.0078 < 0.3667

SAFE ON BEARING

The load transmitted to the foundation must be within the safe bearing capacity limit of the foundation

material. If the transmitted load exceeds the bearing capacity limit of the foundation, the structure will

sink. The bearing pressure at the base is checked using the following equations:

Pbase= ∑V/Abase(1+ 6e/L) = 4943.7 kg/m2

where Pbase= maximum pressure transmitted to the foundation

V = the sum of vertical forces acting on the block

L = length of the base

A = base area of the block

The allowable bearing pressure of soft clays and silts = 5000 kg/m2> Pbase

SAFE AGAINST SLIDING

The structure should not slide over its foundation which is checked as:

µ ∑V / ∑H ≥ 1.5

7.48 ≥ 1.5

µ = Friction co-efficient between the block and the foundation = tanø

The dimension taken was taken so that they satisfy safety on all three cases which can be built to replace

the degraded ones at the site.

Page 48: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

48

13.3 Cost Estimation

Total Volume = 3.125 m3

This is the volume of PCC used to construct the support pier.

Analysis of Rates of PCC (1:2:4) in foundation and super-structure

Particulars Quantity or Nos. Rate Cost

Excavation 2.42 m3 NRs. 180 per cu.m NRs. 435.60

Materials

Cement

Sand

Aggregate

13.5 bags

9.75 cu.ft

17.7 cu.ft

NRs. 800 per bag

NRs. 90 per cu.ft

NRs. 81 per cu.ft

NRs. 10,800.00

NRs. 900.00

NRs. 1,430.00

Manpower

Skilled

Unskilled

1 for 2 days

4 for 2 days

NRs. 530 per Manday

NRs. 320 per Manday

NRs.1,060.00

NRs.2,560.00

Total NRs.17,185.60

Add 1.5% for water charges = NRs. 257.78

Add 10% Contractor’s profit = NRs. 1,718.56

Total = NRs. 19,161.34

Three such piers need to be constructed, hence Grand Total = NRs. 57,484.02

Page 49: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

49

14. INSPECTION WORKS

The power house has a 5 ton lifting crane working properly and staffs are positioned which take

required data at regular intervals.

The turbines which were kept for repair had large eroded parts. So, a valuable decision will be

cleaning the reservoir so that the silts can settle down and prevented from getting into the penstock.

There are also possibilities of bringing more water from rivers to the reservoir; that is mainly from

Nagmati as very less water is diverted. Using this extra amount of collected water new set of

equipments can be set up in the powerhouse.

The canal of Shayalmati has also to be rennovated as at many places the walls have been collapsed.

There are some leakages in penstock but these can be sealed off.

The anchor blocks along the penstock have deteriorated and are at the verge of collapse (See pictoral

highlights fig.2 and fig.3) which need to be repaired.

Huge amounts of sediments were found at the reservoir. As a temporary solution, some lumps of silt

were manually taken out to the bank of the reservoir. Necessary flushing mechanism need to be put

into operation.

The rehabilitation of this power station is underway under the joint assistance from ADB, GON and

NEA. NEA has received loan from ADB towards the cost of Power Efficiency Improvement as part of

Electricity Transmission Expansion and Supply Improvement Project. NEA intends to apply a portion

of the proceeds of this loan for Rehabilitation of Sundarijal HPP. The proposed rehabilitation works

largely consists of electro-mechanical rehabilitation and recruitment of international individual

consultant in intermittent assignment for design and implementation support for Part C: Rehabilitation

of small HPP.

Mechanical Works:

a. Repair and maintenance of runner buckets in both units.

b. Penstock repair and maintenance works.

c. Repair oil cooler of turbines

Electrical works:

a. Rewinding of excitor of turbines

b. Replacement of 3.3 kV XPLE cable from generator to step-up transformer and 11 kV cable

from switchyard to pole with cable termination kit.

Civil Maintenance Works:

a. Repair of canal from Nagmati to Bagmati Forebay.

b. Cleaning of Balancing Reservoir.

c. Construction of four numbers of penstock support pillars near Bhatte Danda.

d. Construction of single storey new staff quarter.

Page 50: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

50

15. PUBLIC CONSULTATION The dam site of Sundarijal HPP lies at Shivapuri National park which makes it a very busy domestic and

tourist site especially at weekends. The natural beauty, picnic spots, rivers and pond to swim makes it a

very important place to be with family and friends. This had led to an increase the value of this place in

commercial terms as well. Sundarijal HHP adds an intake, reservoir and dam sites which makes the place

beautiful in aesthetic sense.

Local people are conscious about the maintenance of the civil structures, i.e. penstock and support piers

mainly. They face the normal loadshedding schedule although 1 hour less each day.

The people in the locality whose houses are nearby along the penstock length have stated their

dissatisfaction regarding the regular maintenance. The public showed interest in the upgradation as well,

i.e. upgradation from 640kW to 1.2 MW.

In the past, tenders for maintenance and operation were given to the local by NEA which accumulated a

budget enough to employ certain manpower of the society. |However, currently, the tender has been given

to others besides the local; this change in procurement of services had upset the local. Their claim is that

the lack of rehabilitation detected at the site was due to this conflict.

Page 51: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

51

16. PROJECT SCHEDULE

Page 52: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

52

17. OUTCOMES

The outcomes of this project are as follows:

i. Head of the hydropower was determined by field work which was then compared with the recent

measurement done by NEA and was found to be nearly equal.

ii. Degraded civil components were detected.

iii. Data collection and calculation of various hydropower parameters can be utilized in development

works

iv. Design and suggestions made in this report can be a motivation for rehabilitation of this HPP in future.

18. LIMITATIONS OF THE PROJECT The whole span of the penstock alignment could not be inspected since some part were

inaccessible.

Inspection of the total quantity of silt deposited in the reservoir was not determined.

19. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS This mini-project was successful to achieve its objectives. Regarding RUM, several degradations have

been put into highlights in this report and suitable suggestions have been provided. With the regular RUM

works done by NEA, Sundarijal HPP has more potential to develop and increase its power generation.

This report can be very useful as a reference whenever head, discharge, flow duration curve, flow mass

curve, check for power potential, design of support piers, etc. will be of need to be referred to in the

future.

Page 53: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

53

20. REFERENCES Bathtub curve. (2014, March 3). Retrieved from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathtub_curve

Authority, N. E. (n.d.). TERMS OF REFERENCE. Nepal: Electricity Transmission Expansion and Supply

Improvement Project. Kathmandu University, Nepal: Nepal Electricity Authority.

Dutts, B. N. (2013). Estimating and Costing in Civil Engineering. New Delhi: UBS Publishers' Distributors Pvt.

Ltd.

Goldberg, J., & Lier, O. E. (n.d.). REHABILITATION OF HYDROPOWER - An introduction to economic and

technical issues. worldbank.org.

Subramanya, K. (n.d.). Engineering Hydrology. Tata McGraw Hill.

Page 54: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

54

PICTORIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Photo: 3 Dam

Photo: 1 Penstock resting on support pier Photo: 2 Displaced Anchor Block

Page 55: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

55

Photo: 4 Reservoir

Photo: 5 River Stretch

Page 56: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

56

Photo: 6 Canal Section

Photo: 7 Trash Rack at Canal

Page 57: Final Report of Group 6 Sundarijal HPP

57

Photo: 8 Source of Canal

Photo: 9 Team performing Fly Levelling