feasibility studies of oil & gas upstream projects · facilities design / facilities capex...
TRANSCRIPT
Feasibility Studies of Oil & Gas Upstream Projects
2
2
INGENIX GROUP - ABOUT US
5+ years / 120+ projects screened & evaluated
in oil&gas upstream in Russia
Prescreening of assets / Finding attractive targets
Detailed multi-scenario feasibility studies
CAPEX/OPEX evaluation using unique cost databases
Deep Analysis of Reserves / Development
Scenarios
2D/3D seismic and well data interpretation
Geological modeling. Reserves evaluation. Assessment of geological
risks
Reservoir development scenarios
Know-how in Project Evaluation / Cost
Engineering
Own software specially developed by Ingenix Group for
screening / feasibility studies incl. detailed cost evaluation
(Ingenix Cost Manager ®, Ingenix Cost Evaluator ®, Ingenix
Cost Viewer ®)
3
3
OUR MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM
ECONOMICS DRILLING/ FACILITIES / OPERATIONS DEVELOPMENT GEOLOGY PETROPHYSICS SEISMICS
2D/3D seismic
data processing
supervision and
interpretation
Well survey data
interpretation
Geological
modeling /
Reserves
evaluation
Reservoir modeling
/ Development
scenarios
Well
construction /
Drilling and
well completion
cost evaluation
Facilities design /
Facilities CAPEX
evaluation
OPEX evaluation DCF-analysis (NPV
/ IRR / PBP, etc.) /
Sensitivity
analysis / Risk
analysis
• > 20 professionals
• With average experience in industry– 15 years
• 4 PhDs
Membership in Professional Societies Previous Employers
4
Engaging one company instead of a pool of consultants helps you to match your
investment decision gates
ONE TEAM IS MORE EFFICIENT
5
FEASIBILITY STUDY PF GREENFIELDS – THAT’S WHERE
TEAMWORK WINS
6 Initial data analysis is carried out in *sgy , las-formats; geological model analysis is done
in Petrel and Irap RMS
Expertise of Results of Structural and Dynamic Interpretation of Real Data
Allows you to confirm the accuracy or identify mistakes in picking of horizons, fault tracking, mapping, reservoir properties prediction Makes it possible to take into account new geological and geophysical data
Expertise of 3D Geological Models
Allows to confirm accuracy or identify
mistakes in modeling results Makes it possible to take into account new geological and geophysical data
«Live»
Data
Expertise of Results of Well Log Interpretation
Allows to confirm accuracy or identify
mistakes in interpretation results
Makes it possible to take into account new geological and petrophysical data, including data for analogue fields
6
GEOSCIENCE SOLUTIONS – WE DO NOT RELY ON PDF REPORTS
7
Expertize of structural and dynamic interpretation results on real data
«Live»
Data Ingenix
group 2011
Структурная карта по кровле продуктивного пласта
As a result of seismic cube analysis, incorrect positioning of 3D data in the process of re-
interpretation in 2011 was demonstrated. On the basis of incorrect structural interpretation later
was generated and approved an official reserve audit.
Structural map Structural map
GEOSCIENCE SOLUTIONS – WE DO NOT RELY ON PDF REPORTS (2)
8
«Live»
Data
Expertize of well log interpretation data
Overestimation
pf Phi to oil-gas
contact
Additional shift of
related to depth
core
As a result of real data analysis, overestimation of weighted average Phi value was
shown. It happened due to incorrect selection of intervals with high porosity and core
location was shifted on purpose.
Existence of collector with Phi
more than 15% can not be proved
with core data
GEOSCIENCE SOLUTIONS – WE DO NOT RELY ON PDF REPORTS (3)
9 Express interpretation with use of Paradigm and ffA software
Changing
Focus
Regional information analysis
Reginal sedimentation data analysis
Use of analogue field data and statistics analysis of
filtration-capacitive properties, properties of fluids
and etc.
ЛУ
Modern technologies
Implementation of automatic classification for
seismic data, spectral decomposition + RGB
summation, different algorithms for coherency
estimation allows to develop alternative more
detailed geological models
Detection of inconsistencies in valuation parameters
used in reserves audit report with core reports and
well tests data
Detection fop errors in valuation parameters
connected with arithmetic, misspelling and etc.
Detection of errors and inconsistencies in reports
GEOSCIENCE SOLUTIONS – DETAILS ARE IMPORTANT
10
Block В
Block А
6 открытых
месторождений
УВ
Changing
Focus
Analysis of regional information
As a result of regional geological data analysis (development history of the
region, tectonics, lithostratigraphical cut), conclusion on low probability of
new discoveries on Block B was made. And also on low probability of high
well production rates as on Block A.
Block B
Block А
GEOSCIENCE SOLUTIONS – REGIONAL DATA IS VALUE
11
Changing
Focus
Modern technologies
As a result of express re-interpretation of 3D seismic data new alternative
tectonic model was developed, which later was used for reserve evaluation.
2009
2013
Ingenix Group
Spectral decomposition
RGB-summation
16-24-32 Hz
Spectral decomposition
RGB-summation
16-24-32 Hz
GEOSCIENCE SOLUTIONS – STATE-OF-THE-ART SERVICES
12 Reserves evaluation with soft-ware: Petrel (Schlumberger), Irap (Roxar), Isoline,
Crystal Ball
Independent
View
Depend on quality and quantity of input data
selection of proper method for reserves
evaluation
max
aver
min
Probabilistic and scenarios approaches
Multivariate evaluation of geological success rate
probability
Project rating according to risk
Identification of main geological risks and
recommendation for risk mitigation activities
Risk and contingencies valuation
Exploration Planning
Recommendation on further exploration
activities and methods of exploration in
accordance with modern approaches and
technologies
GEOSCIENCE SOLUTIONS – RISKS ARE UNDER CONTROL
13
Exploration Planning
S 3D=900 км2
Exploration activities planning are based on license obligations and/ or Company
working plans with consideration of geological risks/ success and expenditures.
S 3D=550 км2
S 3D=250 км2
Independent
View
GEOSCIENCE SOLUTIONS – WE HELP TO PLAN EXPLORATION
WORKS
14
Monthly production reports, flow tests, well history
Analysis of inputs allows to determine data validity,
uncertainties, estimate problems of development and
define key tasks of production increase
Индикаторная диаграмма. Пласт Д5-2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Дебит нефти т/сут
Деп
ресси
я, М
Па
Скв. 285 (инт. 4252-4260 м)
Скв. 299 (инт. 4292-4295 м)
Скв. 288 (инт. 4256-4262 м)
Скв. 300 (инт. 4357-4364 м)
Скв. 293 (инт. 4244-4253 м)
Кпрод=9,8 т/сут*МПа
Кпрод=3,8 т/сут*МПа
Кпрод=3,5 т/сут*МПа
Кпрод=1,7 т/сут*МПа
Кпрод=1,5 т/сут*МПа
Selection of analogues
Selection of analogues to define similar
development conditions, examine possible
scenarios, decline rates and identify border
conditions for parameters and uncertainties
Probabilistic estimate
Use of probabilistic approach based on statistics on
analogues fields to provide clarification of inputs:
uncertainties of porosity, viscosity, saturation
pressure etc.
«Живые»
данные
“Live” Data
Results of analysis: inputs clarification, development of structured database,
determination of uncertainties and probabilistic estimate of key uncertainties
RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT - WE DO NOT RELY ON PDF REPORTS
15
Selection of development target and scenarios
Selection of development target based on in-house
estimation taking into account various field
development technologies
Development scenarios are selected depending on
chosen criteria, development rates and border
conditions (minimal, optimal, maximal)
Variation and
Optimization
Selection and justification of development system
Development system planning, taking into account
probabilistic estimation of input parameters for
each scenario by means of 2D/3D simulators
Selection of development system is based on
feasibility studies
Optimization of estimated figures taking into
account new technologies
Description of risks to mitigate probable
negative impact
Optimization and risk assessment
Selection of development target is based on in-house estimation taking into account use
of new technologies. Field development scenarios are defined. For development targets
are calculated cost effective net oil pay, well spacing, initial flow etc. Forecasting of
performance indicators and optimization of scenarios. Risk assessment.
RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT – THE BEST OPTION IS TO BE CHOSEN
16
Selection of development target and development scenario
Вариативность
и оптимизация
Variation and
Optimization
Overlaid Contour Map
Geological profile
RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT – THE BEST OPTION IS TO BE CHOSEN
(2)
17
Variation and
Optimization
Algorithm of development system selection
Calculation of development elements with use of 2D/ 3D simulators
Selection of a development system
1. Justification of development system
2. Justification of well profile
3. Justification of horizontal section
length
NPV (@12%), mln RUR
NPV (@12%), mln RUR
RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT – THE BEST OPTION IS TO BE CHOSEN
(3)
18
Variation and
Optimization
Calculation of initial pay ratio
Selection and validation of a field development system
RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT – THE BEST OPTION IS TO BE CHOSEN
(4)
19
Variation and
Optimization
Decline rates forecast (fluid and oil)
нефти
Selection and validation of a field development system
Oil decline rate
Decline rates are calculated by
means of 2D simulator (injection
wells work as producing for 9
months)
RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT – THE BEST OPTION IS TO BE CHOSEN
(5)
20
Variation and
Optimization
Well production profile
Selection and validation of field development system
RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT – THE BEST OPTION IS TO BE CHOSEN
(6)
21
Variation and
Optimization
Optimization and risk assessment
Selection of optimum well spacing
Calculation of cost efficient oil net pays depending on development plan
Object U2-6. NPV depending on oil net pays and
probabilities (directional wells)
Object U2-3. NPV depending on oil net pays and
probabilities (horizontal wells)
RISKS ARE UNDER CONTROL
RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT – RISKS ARE UNDER CONTROL
22
Variation and
Optimization
Optimization based on cost efficient oil net pays
Optimization and risk assessment
Risk assessment
Risk Description Activities on risk mitigation
Developme
nt risks
Initial flows are not confirmed.
Production profiles are not
confirmed.
Retesting of exploratory wells with
fracking, early drilling, well performance
with fracking, organization of pilot areas to
test petroleum recovery techniques.
Oil net pay, m
Case NPV, mln RUR
18 m oil net pay
RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT – RISKS ARE UNDER CONTROL (2)
23
“Live” Data
Review of existing infrastructure
Prospects of existing infrastructure use,
including energy supply, roads, pipelines,
pits etc.
Validation of transport scheme
Analysis of possible transportation
routes by all available means
Selection and validation of well pad distribution pattern
Variation of transportation routes, pipeline
connection points, estimation of amount and
objects construction time
DRILLING AND FACILITIES – ALL INPUT INFORMATION IS VERIFIED
24
Variation and
Optimization
Justification of well design
Justification of well design based on data from
petroleum engineers
Estimate of well construction costs
Justification and process design
Hydraulic calculations of oil, gas and condensate
transportation systems, pipeline diameter and
wall thickness
Process design of processing and transportation
objects if necessary
Alternatives of field infrastructure development
Alternatives of field infrastructure development for
their economic efficiency evaluation
DRILLING AND FACILITIES – THE BEST OPTION IS TO BE CHOSEN
25
Unique Software
Solutions
OPEX estimation
OPEX estimation with use of standard cost methods
(proprietary technology). Depending on project
technical parameters demand for personnel,
materials and services is calculated
CAPEX estimation
CAPEX estimation is based on technical and
economic modelling - cost is defined through
analogue objects with the most appropriate technical
parameters.
In-house Database
Multilevel database of more than 1800 typical oil & gas
objects (technical & cost parameters) in 18 regions of
Russia
Database is structured and provides information from
object to unit of equipment
Processes are automatized by means of own Ingenix Cost Manager software
CAPEX AND OPEX EVALUATION – DETAILED DOWN TO EQUIPMENT
UNITS
26
Variation and
Optimization
Analysis of applicable tax benefits
Depending on geological parameters of fields
recommendations about applicable tax benefits
are provided (according to the latest changes
of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation)
Sensitivity analysis
Defining of sensibility towards main project
factors (capital expenditures, operational
expenditures, prices, production)
Identification of key project risks
Identification, description and evaluation of
risks having critical impact on the project
NPV EVALUATION – SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR BETTER RESULT
27
OUR ADVANTAGES
An integrated approach to services in oil & gas upstream allows
our clients to keep deadlines and reach efficiency targets
Our team has a profound experience in different fields of
expertise, having performed evaluation of 120+ oil&gas projects
in Russia and abroad
We try our best to use best practices and develop our own
know-how to provide our clients with the state-of-the-art
solutions
03.09.2018
Ingenix Group LLC
Ulitsa Bolshaya Tatarskaya, 9
Moscow, 115184, Russia
+7 (495) 783-00-09
www. ingenix-group.ru