ece 802-604: nanoelectronics
DESCRIPTION
ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics. Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University [email protected]. Lecture 14, 15 Oct 13. In Chapters 02 and 03 in Datta: How to correctly measure I = GV Brief discussion: Roukes article Two typo correction HW02 Pr. 2.3 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ECE 802-604:Nanoelectronics
Prof. Virginia AyresElectrical & Computer EngineeringMichigan State [email protected]
![Page 2: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lecture 14, 15 Oct 13
In Chapters 02 and 03 in Datta:
How to correctly measure I = GVBrief discussion: Roukes articleTwo typo correction HW02 Pr. 2.3
Add scattering to Landauer-ButtikerCaveat: when Landauer-Buttiker doesn’t workWhen it does: Sections 2.5 and 2.6: motivation: why:
2.5: Probes as scatterers especially at high bias/tempsButtiker approach for dealing with incoherent scatterers
2.6 occupied states as scatterers
3.1 scattering/S matrix
![Page 3: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Roukes article:
![Page 4: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Roukes article:
![Page 5: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Roukes article: TR possibilities:
F = q(v x B) = -|e| (v X B)
rebound directrebound direct
+ seems to be X B
![Page 6: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Roukes article: TL possibilities:
F = q(v x B) = -|e| (v X B)
rebounddirect
rebounddirect
![Page 7: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Roukes article:
HW01 VA Pr.01: x = 0.4, here it is x = 0.3
HW01 Datta E1.1Find f
HW01 Datta E1.2Find n and
![Page 8: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Two typos Pr. 2.3:
Roukes article: TR
rebound direct
Roukes article: TL
rebounddirect
![Page 9: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Two typos Pr. 2.3, marked in magenta:
Datta Pr. 2.3, p. 113: TL Datta Pr. 2.3, p. 113: TR
T2
1 X B
![Page 10: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lecture 14, 15 Oct 13
In Chapters 02 and 03 in Datta:
How to correctly measure I = GVBrief discussion: Roukes article: HW02 Pr. 2.3:
Add scattering to Landauer-ButtikerCaveat: when Landauer-Buttiker doesn’t workWhen it does: Sections 2.5 and 2.6: motivation: why:
2.5: Probes as scatterers especially at high bias/tempsButtiker approach for dealing with incoherent scatterers
3.1 scattering/S matrix
![Page 11: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
In Section 2.5:2-t example: with broadened Fermi f0
Lec13:
Practical example: Roukes
![Page 12: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
If T = T’, can get to Landauer-Buttiker but no reason why T should = T’.Especially if energies from probes took e- far from equilibrium.
i as a function of how much energy E/what channel M the e- is in
Lec13:
![Page 13: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Can expect T = T’ at equilibrium.Consider: if energies from probes don’t take e- far from equilibrium:
Lec13:
![Page 14: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
New useful G:
Lec13:
![Page 15: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
E
Ef )(0
Basically I = G^V = G^ (1-2) ethat works when probes hotted things up but not too far from equilibrium
Lec13:
![Page 16: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Example: does the figure shown appear to meet the linear (I = G^ V) regime criteria?
Criteria is: 1-2 << kBT
FWHM shown is kBT
Answer: No, they appear to be about the same (red and blue).
However, part of FT(E) is low value. Comparing an ‘effective’ 1-2 (green)
maybe it’s OK.
Lec13:
![Page 17: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lec13: If T(E) changes rapidly with energy, the “correlation energy” c is said to be small.
E
T(E)
0.85
0.09
5 eV 5.001 eV
A very minimal change in e- energy and you are getting a different and much worse transmission probability.
![Page 18: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
2-DEG
![Page 19: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Example: in HW01 Pr. 1.1 you solved for for a 2-DEG in GaAs @ 1 K using the graph shown in Figure 1.3.2 .
Estimate the corresponding correlation energy c
![Page 20: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Answer:
Estimate the corresponding correlation energy c
![Page 21: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lecture 14, 15 Oct 13
In Chapters 02 and 03 in Datta:
How to correctly measure I = GVBrief discussion: Roukes articleTwo typo correction HW02 Pr. 2.3
Add scattering to Landauer-ButtikerCaveat: when Landauer-Buttiker doesn’t workWhen it does: Sections 2.5 and 2.6: motivation: why:
2.5: Probes as scatterers especially at high bias/temps Buttiker approach for dealing with incoherent scatterers
3.1 scattering/S matrix
![Page 22: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lec10: Scattering: Landauer formula for R for 1 coherent scatterer X:
Reflection = resistance
![Page 23: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
E > barrier height V0
E < barrier height V0
Lec 10: Coherent scattering means that phases of both transmitted and reflected e- waves are related to the incoming e- wave in a known manner
![Page 24: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Lec 10: Transmission probability for 2 scatterers: T => T12:
That’s interesting. That Ratio is additive:
Assuming that the scatterers are identical:
![Page 25: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Therefore: Resistance for two coherent scatterers is:
![Page 26: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
![Page 27: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
![Page 28: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
![Page 29: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
![Page 30: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Resistance is due to partially coherent /partially incoherent transmission
![Page 31: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
1 Deg, M = 1
Example:probe
LR
X XO
![Page 32: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
probe
LR
1 Deg, M = 1
X XO
![Page 33: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Model the phase destroying impurity as two channels attached to an energy reservoir
![Page 34: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Influence of the incoherent impurity can be described using a Landauer approach as:
![Page 35: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
![Page 36: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
![Page 37: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
![Page 38: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
![Page 39: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
Landauer-Buttiker treats all “probes” equally: what is going into “probe” 3:
![Page 40: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
L R
Landauer-Buttiker treats all “probes” equally: what is going into “probe” 4:
![Page 41: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Outline of the solution:
Goal: V = IR, solve for R
What is V: A – B
What is I: I = I1 = I2
![Page 42: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
probe
LR
A B
1 Deg, M = 1
X XO
![Page 43: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
![Page 44: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
![Page 45: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
![Page 46: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Condition: net current I3 + I4 = 0
![Page 47: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
![Page 48: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Condition: net current I3 + I4 = 0
![Page 49: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
Condition: net current I3 + I4 = 0
![Page 50: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
![Page 51: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
![Page 52: ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051820/56813b7c550346895da48e10/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13
LR