E-PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW

Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education

“The growing public demand for increased accountability, quality and transparency coupled with the changing structure and globalization of higher education requires a transformation of accreditation.”

A TEST OF LEADERSHIP: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher EducationA Report of the Commission Appointed by Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings - 2006

Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education

“Higher education institutions should measure student learning using quality assessment data from instruments such as, for example, the Collegiate Learning Assessment, which measures the growth of student learning taking place in colleges, and the Measure of Academic Proficiency and Progress, which is designed to assess general education outcomes for undergraduates in order to improve the quality of instruction and learning.”

A TEST OF LEADERSHIP: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education - 2006

What is an E-Portfolio?

Digital archive of multimedia work arranged for specific audiences

Process

Graphic from Indiana University

What is an E-Portfolio?

• Product - the website, the CD-ROM or DVD and the technologies used to create the portfolio-as-product (blog, wiki, course management system, software, etc.)

-Helen Barrett, Ph.D.

Benefits

• For students, e-Portfolios provide a means to reflect on their educational experiences, make connections and showcase their best work in an accessible digital format.

Benefits

• For institutions, e-Portfolios are used to evaluate progress on meeting institutional goals.

Types of E-portfolios

Teaching & Learning

Assessment & Accreditation

Personal Representati

on

Types of E-portfolios

• Teaching and Learning–Developmental completion of program

requirements with student reflection - Example: Virginia Tech

–Chronicle of student growth; “story of learning”

Considerations – Learning E-Portfolios

Integrated Learning ModelCourse Assignment Grading/Reflection

Artifact

Learning/Developmen

t

Showcase/Personal, Program

Assessment/Accreditation

Considerations – Learning E-Portfolio Pilots

• Integrated CMS and E-Portfolio• Ease-of-use for students and

faculty• Flexibility/adaptability of tools• Faculty control• Required file formats• Cost/funding models

Considerations – Learning E-Portfolios

Blackboard - Sakai/Bridges

• Learning Curve - Blackboard 9 versus Sakai 2.6

• Portability of content• Training and Support options

Types of E-portfolios

• Personal Representation–Enhanced resume -

Example – Northeastern University Student Portfolio

–Final Achievement Showcase – Example: LaGuardia CC Capstone

–Visual Showcase/Gallery – Example: University of Denver

Types of E-portfolios

• Assessment & Accreditation– Curriculum assessment – associate

artifacts with assessment rubrics– Aggregate student work for comparison

using defined criteria for external reviewers– Demonstrate student mastery of specific

competencies/standards for course, program, institution, graduation, etc. Examples: Indiana University; Virginia Tech; U Wisconsin

Considerations – Assessment E-Portfolios

• Data aggregation and reporting• Security• Access for multiple reviewers/peers• Archiving/ data storage• Required file formats• Cost/funding models

Stages of Learning Portfolio Development

• Defining Portfolio’s Context and Goals–Program–Course

• Archive Creation and Digital Conversion• Reflection• Connection• Presentation

-Helen Barrett, Ph.D.

Types of Evidence for Academic E-Portfolio

• Course Submissions

• Co-curricular Artifacts

• Attestations

Types of Evidence for Academic E-Portfolio

Productions: • Goal Statements• Reflective Statements• Captions

-Barton & Collins (1997)

E-Portfolio Adoption for GenEd

INSTITUTION•NEASC Standards•RWU Mission and Goals

• General Education• Technology Resources

GENERAL ED PROGRAM•Learning Outcomes/ Accreditation Standards•Mapping Outcomes/Standards by Course

COURSES•Syllabi with Learning Outcomes•Mapping Outcomes by Activities•Common Grading Rubrics for Activities

Kapi’olani Community College – U of Hawaii system General Education Program Portfolio - 2005

RWU General Education Learning Outcomes

Communications Creativity Global Perspectives Human Connections Inquiry Social Responsibility Systems Thinking

FYS

Course 1

Course 2

Course 3

Course 4

Course 5

Capstone

Legend: Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Sample Course Matrix – FYS

Assignment 1 Assignment 2 Assignment 3 Assignment 4 Assignment 5

Communication

Creativity

Global Perspectives

Human Connections

Inquiry

Social Responsibility

Systems Thinking

Legend: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Sample Assignment Submissions

John Smith B View

Ann Taylor C View

Jim Woods A View

Sue Wilson F View

Jackie Chen A View

Laura Bard D View

Assignment description – instructions, outcome(s), rubric, etc/

Capstone Milestones Benchmark 4 3 2 1Determine the Extent of Information Needed

Effectively defines the scope of the research question or thesis. Effectively determines key concepts. Types of information (sources) selected directly relate to concepts or answer research question.

Defines the scope of the research question or thesis completely. Can determine key concepts. Types of information (sources) selected relate to concepts or answer research question.

Defines the scope of the research question or thesis incompletely (parts are missing, remains too broad or too narrow, etc.). Can determine key concepts. Types of information (sources) selected partially relate to concepts or answer research question.

Has difficulty defining the scope of the research question or thesis. Has difficulty determining key concepts. Types of information (sources) selected do not relate to concepts or answer research question.

Access the Needed Information

Accesses information using effective, well-designed search strategies and most appropriate information sources.

Accesses information using variety of search strategies and some relevant information sources. Demonstrates ability to refine search.

Accesses information using simple search strategies, retrieves information from limited and similar sources.

Accesses information randomly, retrieves information that lacks relevance and quality.

Evaluate Information and its Sources Critically

Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others' assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position.

Identifies own and others' assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position.

Questions some assumptions. Identifies several relevant contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of others' assumptions than one's own (or vice versa).

Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position.

Use Information Effectively to Accomplish a Specific Purpose

Communicates, organizes and synthesizes information from sources to fully achieve a specific purpose, with clarity and depth

Communicates, organizes and synthesizes information from sources. Intended purpose is achieved.

Communicates and organizes information from sources. The information is not yet synthesized, so the intended purpose is not fully achieved.

Communicates information from sources. The information is fragmented and/or used inappropriately (misquoted, taken out of context, or incorrectly paraphrased, etc.), so the intended purpose is not achieved.

Access and Use Information Ethically and Legally

Students use correctly all of the following information use strategies (use of citations and references; choice of paraphrasing, summary, or quoting; using information in ways that are true to original context; distinguishing between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution) and demonstrate a full understanding of the ethical and legal restrictions on the use of published, confidential, and/or proprietary information.

Students use correctly three of the following information use strategies (use of citations and references; choice of paraphrasing, summary, or quoting; using information in ways that are true to original context; distinguishing between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution) and demonstrates a full understanding of the ethical and legal restrictions on the use of published, confidential, and/or proprietary information.

Students use correctly two of the following information use strategies (use of citations and references; choice of paraphrasing, summary, or quoting; using information in ways that are true to original context; distinguishing between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution) and demonstrates a full understanding of the ethical and legal restrictions on the use of published, confidential, and/or proprietary information.

Students use correctly one of the following information use strategies (use of citations and references; choice of paraphrasing, summary, or quoting; using information in ways that are true to original context; distinguishing between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution) and demonstrates a full understanding of the ethical and legal restrictions on the use of published, confidential, and/or proprietary information.

VALUE RUBRIC – INFORMATION LITERACY

Information LiteracyVALUE Rubric

Capstone Milestones Benchmark 4 3 2 1Access the Needed Information

Accesses information using effective, well-designed search strategies and most appropriate information sources.

Accesses information using variety of search strategies and some relevant information sources. Demonstrates ability to refine search.

Accesses information using simple search strategies, retrieves information from limited and similar sources.

Accesses information randomly, retrieves information that lacks relevance and quality.

VALUE RUBRICS: http://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/

Getting Started

Step 1: Define the goal

Determine what a portfolio means to your program.

Step 2: Set objectivesIdentify what we want students to learn

– Align with mission– Look at institutional, state, and national standards– Research other programs

Seton Hall

Getting Started

Step 3: Develop curriculum & activities

Describe content and tasks – Map Curriculum– Learn and integrate new teaching practices– Revise syllabi

Step 4: Assess & revise learning

Determine whether objectives were met – Develop evaluation instruments; Create rubrics– Analyze results– Revise curriculum based on results

Seton Hall

Considerations – E-portfolio as Assessment

• Consistency of e-portfolios throughout GenEd program/courses

• Negotiating common learning goals across sections of a course

• Identifying, adopting, building and collecting common learning assignments that reflect mastery of learning goals

• Integration of e-portfolios with other technologies, file formats

• Support and training

E-PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW