dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

22
Director-General, The Energy and Resources Institute Chairman, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1 R. K. Pachauri 12 August 2013 Joensuu, Finland Climate Change and Bio-economy Challenges and Opportunities

Upload: koliforum

Post on 08-Jul-2015

118 views

Category:

News & Politics


1 download

DESCRIPTION

"Changing climate - Is resource efficiency a way out of crisis?" All countries must take more action. Otherwise the climate change will continue steadily. As a result, there is a growing risk that different types of crisis and the struggle for increasingly scarce natural resources, such as clean water, will become more common. Could resource efficiency boost growth at country level and, in this way, prevent conflicts? And what would be the role of resource efficiency in the recovery from conflicts? What are the challenges and opportunities of the bioeconomy in the slowing down of climate change? This topical morning seminar studied the relationship between resource efficiency, development and conflicts on the one hand and the relationship between climate change and bioeconomy on the other. Speeches were given by Doctor Rajendra K. Pachauri, Chairman of IPCC and Heidi Hautala, Finland’s Minister for International Development. The audience was provided with an opportunity to discuss the issues concerned with the speakers. The seminar, organised by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, TERI and the Nordic office of TERI, will serve as an introduction to the Koli Forum that will take place between 17 and 19 September. www.koliforum.fi

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Director-General, The Energy and Resources Institute

Chairman, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

1

R. K. Pachauri

12 August 2013

Joensuu, Finland

Climate Change and Bio-economy –

Challenges and Opportunities

Page 2: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

The tragedy of the commons develops in this way. Picture a

pasture open to all. It is to be expected that each herdsman

will try to keep as many cattle as possible on the commons.

Such an arrangement may work reasonably satisfactorily for

centuries because tribal wars, poaching, and disease keep

the numbers of both man and beast well below the carrying

capacity of the land. Finally, however, comes the day of

reckoning, that is, the day when the long-desired goal of

social stability becomes a reality. At this point, the inherent

logic of the commons remorselessly generates tragedy.

-Garrett Hardin

Page 3: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

In the 1970s, Georgescu-Roegen coined theterm bioeconomics for a new approach ineconomics: "The term is intended to make usbear in mind continuously the biological originof the economic process and thus spotlight theproblem of mankind's existence with a limitedstore of accessible resources, unevenly locatedand unequally appropriated"

Page 4: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Sustainable development

4

“Sustainable development

is development that meets

the needs of the present

without compromising the

ability of future generations

to meet their own needs.”

Source : Brundtland Report, 1987, UN

Page 5: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

5

125,000 years ago…

The polar regions were

significantly warmer

than present for an

extended period

… which led to

reductions in polar ice

volume and sea level

rise of 4 to 6 m .

Palaeoclimatic information supports the interpretation that the warmth of the last

half century is unusual in at least the previous 1,300 years.

Warming Of The Climate System Is Unequivocal

Source : IPCC

Page 6: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Understanding climate change

6

Causes of change

Global GHG emissions due to human activities

have grown since pre-industrial times, with an

increase of 70% between 1970 and 2004

CO2 annual emissions grew by about 80%

between 1970 and 2004

Most of the observed increase in temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due

to the increase in anthropogenic GHG concentrations

Source : IPCC

Page 7: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Global anthropogenic GHG emissions from 1970 to 2004

7Source : IPCC

Page 8: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Some key findings of the SREX

Source: IPCC

Changes in extreme events:

heavy precipitation

Warm/cold daily temperature

extremes

Heat waves

Sea level rise

Some scenarios show that a 1-in-20 year hottest day is likely to become a 1-in-2 year event

by the end of the 21st century in most regions.

Page 9: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

9

Abrupt And Irreversible Impacts

Partial loss of ice sheets on polar land could imply meters of sea

level rise, major changes in coastlines and inundation of low-lying

areas

20-30% of species are likely to be at risk of extinction if increases in

warming exceed 1.5-2.5°C

Large scale and persistent changes in Meridional Overturning

Circulation would have impacts on marine ecosystem productivity,

fisheries, ocean CO2 uptake and terrestrial vegetation

Source: IPCC

Abrupt And Irreversible Impacts

Page 10: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Fatalities are higher in developing countries

10Source : IPCC

From 1970-2008, over 95% of natural-disaster-related deaths occurred in

developing countries

Page 11: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

11

Adaptation and Mitigation

“Neither adaptation nor

mitigation alone can avoid

all climate change impacts;

however, they can

complement each other and

together can significantly

reduce the risks of climate

change”

- IPCC Fourth Assessment

Report

Source : IPCC

Page 12: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

“There is substantial […] potential for the mitigation of global GHG emissions over the coming decades that

could […] reduce emissions below current levels”

12

Page 13: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

What is REDD Plus?

REDD + is a financial instrument to incentivize conservation and sustainable management of forests and thereby reducing GHG emissions from deforestation and forest degradationUnderlying objectives:

Compensating the forest owners in developing countries for conserving forests by putting a value on the forest carbon stocks

The countries conserving forests forgo the economic gain of harvesting them as well as the benefits from alternative land use and hence need to be compensated for the same

Costs involved in conservation and SMF needs to be shared by other countries as the forests provide a range of offsite ecosystem services that benefit all

Given the livelihood linkage of forests in many developing countries, forest conservation imposes several direct and indirect costs

13

Page 14: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Co-benefits of mitigation

Common drivers lie

behind mitigation

policies and policies

addressing economic

development, poverty,

health, employment,

energy security, and

local environmental

protection

Linking policies provide

the opportunity for no-

regrets policies reducing

greenhouse gases

mitigation costs

Source : IPCC

Page 15: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Development And Mitigation

15

Health co-benefits from

reduced air pollution

Increased energy

security

More rural employment

Increased agricultural

production

Reduced pressure on

natural ecosystems

Promising policies will capitalize on synergies between climate protection and development

priorities to advance both simultaneously.

Page 16: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

16

Rio +20 and climate change mitigation

The Future We Want

§191 “ […] Significant gap between the aggregate effect of Parties’ mitigation pledges in

terms of glob annual emissions of greenhouse gases by 2020 and aggregate emission

pathways consistent with having a likely chance of holding the increase in global average

temperature below 2 °C or 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels.”

Heads of State and Government at Rio +20 :

• call for the widest possible cooperation by all

countries for an effective and appropriate

international response, to reduce global GHGs

• Recognize the importance of mobilizing funding to

support:

• nationally appropriate mitigation actions

(NAMAs),

• adaptation measures,

• technology development and transfer and

• capacity building in developing countries.

Source : UN

Page 17: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

17

Rio +20 critical issue: Energy

The Future We Want

§128 “[…] We recognize that

improving energy efficiency,

increasing the share of

renewable energy, cleaner

and energy-efficient

technologies are important for

sustainable development,

including in addressing climate

change.”

Source : UN

Page 18: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Overcoming barriers

18

A significant increase in the deployment

of RE by 2030, 2050 and beyond is

indicated in the majority of the 164

scenarios reviewed in this SRREN.

However:

A transition to higher shares of RE

would imply increasing investments in

technologies and infrastructure

Policies play a crucial role in accelerating the deployment of RE technologies.

Policies include regulations, financial incentives, public finance mechanisms and carbon pricing mechanisms.

Source : IPCC SRREN

‘Enabling’ policies support RE development and deployment

Page 19: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Systemic Overview of Bio-energy

Production

Page 20: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Schematic View of Commercial

Bio-energy Routes

Page 21: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Processing

of

Bio-fuels

Page 22: Dr pachauris bio economy presentation aug12 2013

Problems Can’t Be Solved At The Level of Awareness That Created Them

- Albert Einstein

The difficulty, is not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones

-John Maynard Keynes