Facu

Receive

doi 10

Abstra

Educatithere iseffectivevaluatioccurreoutcomThese sschool ceffectivthe impoutcomstandardevaluatiFor thisbeen co

A MoEduca

PO Box

Tel 30-69

ulty of Soci

ed Decemb

5296irev8

ct

ional leaders a broad sveness Manion process

ed and the ismes of educastake holdercommunity

veness can blementation

mes in budgeds The purion model fs purpose aonducted in

odel forational

x 3118 Fra

936346617

Andre

PhD

ial Political

Panep

ber 30 2019

8i116341

ship has beescope for fny attempts t

for educatissue remainational leadrs according students l

be also assen of nationaleting handlirpose of thisfor assessingn extensive

n order to ex

r EvaluLeader

Andr

gma Therm

E-mail job

eas Dimopo

D Candidate

l and Econo

pistimioupo

E-mail

9 Accept

UR

en studied infurther resethrow the yeonal leaderss timeless Tership cons

g to literaturlocal societyssed againsl educationaing and overs research ig educationae relative litxplore in d

70

uating thrship T

reas Dimop

mis Post Cod

b1jyahoo

oulos (Corre

e Departmen

omics Scien

oli Komotin

secrecon

ted January

RL https

n depth so farch in terears were unship many This study asidering the re review in y and admist their acadal policy adrcoming mais to design al leadershipterature rev

depth the mo

In

he EffeThe Ca

oulos

de 57001 T

ogr infoa

esponding a

nt of Econom

nces Demo

ni 69100 G

nduthgr

y 25 2020

doiorg10

far worldwidrms of meandergone inreactions raaims to intromost impobroader cat

inistrative pdemic and odministrativanagerial ob

a comprehp based on t

view in educost signific

nternational R

ectivenese of G

hessaloniki

andreasdimo

author)

mics

critus Univ

Greece

Published

5296irev8

de Howeveasuring edun Greece in oaised continoduce a mo

ortant stake tegories are

personnel Eoperational dve tasks and bstacles meeensive appthe results ocational leaant recipien

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

ess of Greece

i Greece

opoulosgr

versity of Th

d January 2

8i116341

er to our knoucational leaorder to estanuous chang

odel of assesholders tha

e the academEducational duty resultsrelative opeeting the leg

plicable andon the aboveadership stunts that edu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

hrace

27 2020

owledge adership ablish an ges have ssing the at affect mic staff

leaderrsquos s such as erational gislation

d holistic e criteria

udies has ucational

leadershinfluencthe resuwho affwhich istudy aeducatioevaluatiimpact manageIt is of aeffectivEducaticommuthese stinfluenclearningcivilizatof schoeducatioto facilimprove

Keywo

1 Intro11 StatMany aeducatiosecondahave bethis situcompreaims toobjectiv12 MeaThe conacademSchoolsthat plaSleegerleadershsignificand ov

hip influencced recipienults of it Thfected by eis structureda relative lonal leaderion model of educati

erial staff ana great impo

veness for aional leader

unity Hencetake holderce in severag outcomestion and ev

ool leaders onal leaderlitate criterie education

rds Educat

oduction tement of thattempts thonal leaderary and higheen raised fruation contiehensive wao create an ave measuraasuring the ncept of ed

mics researcs in order toay a substars 2012) Nhip with an

cant efforts wer-time acc

ce and affecnts by educhus has beeducational d with particliterature rership presento be impleonal leader

nd students ortance to hall levels ofrs affect mae a broaders due to the

al micro and school cli

ventually nacould prov

to recognisia for impr

nal efficienc

tional leade

he Problem ahrow yearsrship effecther educati

rom academinues The may to measuappropriate able and com

Effectiveneducational lchers and edo check impantial role everthelessn acceptablwere made ceptable ev

ct direct or cational leaden designed leaders comcular questieview and nting whilemented in rship effectof an educa

have an evaluf education

any recipienr evaluatione fact that d macroeconimate localational econvide better use competenrovement oy

ership Mana

and Purposhave tried

tiveness inon Several

mic communmain issue iure the effec

assessmentmparative cress of Educaleadership aducational oprovement pin school many remale objectivin the direc

valuation m

71

indirect resdership coua model ba

mplimentedions for eac

a draft ofle the ultim

n real sampltiveness wiational orgaluation modn such as pnts such as sn model shoeducationalnomic criticl society bonomy compeunderstandi

nces to discovercome o

agement Ev

se of the Stud to evalu

n Greece inl evaluation

nity many chis if there cctiveness oft model of riteria ational Leadand its effeorganizationprocess ofteeffectiveneains to be de and effecction of this

model resul

In

spectively uld be the mased on the d with a quch broad catf a pilot evmate target le of particith respect nization

del for assesrimary secstudents facould involvl leadershipcal results sonds teacheetiveness Aing of the j

close weaknobstacles an

valuation m

udy uate and asn all level

n systems hahanges and ould be a trf educationeducational

dership ectiveness hns over timen examineess (Bruggeone in Greective systems however lting in ma

nternational R

The core idmost approp

most signifestionnaire tegory of stvaluation m

is in a focipants in oto subordin

sing the educondary andculty membve assessmep has a greasuch as studers behaviouA transparenjob left to esses in ord

nd eventual

model Effici

ssess educas of educaave organizfailures havransparent al leadershil leadership

has been stume from pas

the variousencate Luyece in assessm since dedid not resu

any reaction

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

dea is that tpriate evaluaficant stakeas evaluati

take holdersmodel in aollowing storder to prenates of ac

ucational lead higher edbers academent criteria at direct or dents achievurs ethics nt evaluatiobe done fo

der to work olly to prom

iency Effec

ational resuation particzed many rve been realstructured ip Thus th

p effectiven

udied by scst years untis leadership

yten Scheesing the eduespite the fult in a conns being r

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

the most ators for e holders ion tool s In this assessing tudy the esent the cademic

adership ducation mics and from all indirect

vements culture n model or every on them

mote and

ctiveness

ults and cular in

reactions ized and fair and

his study ess with

cientists il today p factors erens amp ucational fact that sistently aised in

particulsituationfaces a historicevaluatiand disdevelopissue ofeducatiomeasuraand its accountleadersh13 EduMany tiwhat arwhen aeffectivpossiblethese cathese in2 ReseThe genleadershquantitatry to prelevantResearcleadershand leadResearcobjectivResearcquantita21 InteAccordconstaneducatioon themhas becleadersfurther

lar with regan in such anmajor chal

cally been dion culture tstribution op reflectionf evaluatingonal managable concreevaluation it the overallhip defininucational Leimes there are those critea leader is veness of ee in order an be set fondividual criearch Questneral researhip is a resuative criteriaprovide a rt literature rch question hip Can thdership ch question ve and clearch questionative manneerest in Educing to Leith

ntly growinonal proces

m is sought ome deman The contininvolvemen

ard to the obn important llenge in dedistrusted that takes ref responsib draw conc

g the effectivgement andte criteria Mis studied thl educationa

ng specific eeadership Efare a varietyeria which d

effective ducational to realize w

or assessing iteria tions rch hypotheult which coa and indicaesponse thrreview 1 Who are

hey be credib

2 Could tr criteria andn 3 Can ther and evalucational Lehwood and

ng In theirss are systemAlso anoth

nding there nuous flow nt with it an

bjectivity ofissue is flui

eveloping aparticularly

esults as the bility (OECclusions andveness of edd leadershipMore specifhrough the dal environmefficacy criteEffectivenessy of questiondetermine leor not Thleadership

whether in ethe effectiv

esis in this sould be meaators Thererough the p

the most apble judges o

the outcomed which arehese criteriuated objectadership anRiehl (200view this

matically inher reason foare constanof the resu

d its results

72

f the assessmid and often

a culture ofy by the te first criterio

CD 2011 pd finally foducational lp correlatinfically the edesign of a

ment in all itseria accordis A Term Wns about leaeadership ashis study awith as cl

education cveness of ed

study is whasurable ade are three mprovision o

ppropriate raof the effec

es of the ede these ia be creditively nd Its Impor03) interests is becausnvestigatedor the intensntly changesults of varios On the oth

In

ment methon changeablf evaluationeaching proon or the bap 45) Thisormulate coeadership Ang the effeeffectivenesstandard ev

s dimensioning to those

With Several adership fors effective attempts toearly and a

can be estabducational l

hether the efdequately demain researf informati

aters of the tiveness of

ducational l

ible identif

rtance t in the fielse on the on the othe

se interest ins resulting ious researchher hand th

nternational R

ods and the ce Accordin

n as externaofession Oasis for imprs research ncrete propAim of this ectiveness oss of the eduvaluation mns and all poe recipients

Meanings r example ifor in a more

describe adequately blished objeleadership a

ffectivenessefined by relch questionon that wil

educationalthe educati

leadership b

fied set w

ld of educatone hand er hand then the field ofin new challhes on leadeis results in

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

criteria and ng to OECDal evaluatio

Overall therprovement st

was carriedposals on thwork is to fof leadershucational lea

model that taotential recip

f this is effee simplifiedand delinedefined cri

ective criterand which c

s of the edulative quali

ns on whichll emerge f

l administraional admin

be measurab

with qualitat

ational leadethe results

e leadersrsquo inf education lenges emer

dership reignn increased c

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

thus the D Greece ons have re is no trategies d out to he major focus on hip with adership akes into pients of

ective or d version eate the iteria as ria how could be

ucational tative or

h we will from the

ation and nistration

ble with

tive and

ership is s of the nfluence is that it

rging for nites the criticism

of schooexecutivsuccessthey doadminisevaluateSchool key rolteachersto imprleadershone of tof the m(Cohenthat a prsatisfachas veryinfluencworkingthat pri(Halling2008) Tthe schosmooth involveparentsthe listi22 EvaCriteriaThe pheof achieeducatiothereforto all oschool cfor all undergoimproveand perwhich mhead mOn the behave

ol educatioves Accor

sfully to the o not adequstrative strued-accountaleadership h

le in impros as well asrove the effhip is considthe success most influe McCabe rincipalrsquos le

ction and effy high impace the motivg environmincipal leadger amp HeckThe role of tool unit theoperation

ed or are r depend to ng of the re

aluation of Ea of Effectivenomenon oeving the reonal leadersre its effectof them Focommunityof them A

one which ement evalrformancerdquomakes senseay identify other sideat home a

onal leaders ding to theguidance of

uately explouctures do nable to a shas become

oving schoos the school ficiency anddered very ifactors of th

ential factorMichelli amp

eadership styficacy to levact on the imvation and p

ment (Pont Ndership cank 1996 Mathe leader ine creation of

constitute recipients oa large exte

elevant bibliEducationaveness of leadershiesults whichship in an etiveness muor example educationaA number frequently luation mo All these te to be connschools eff parentsrsquo cand their p

and findinge school lef their suboroit new technot provide atisfactory

e a priority iol outcomesclimate andd equity ofimportant fohe schools (rs in the deamp Pickeral yle and skillvels of engamprovemenperformancNusche amp M

have indirarzano Wan education f a vision inan importanf any form ent on the diography l Leadership

p and its efh in turn reladucational o

ust be studie pupils or al policy ouof terms anamong othenitoring reterms makenected with fectiveness could underperformance

73

gs which foceadership crdinates in thnologies othe requiredextent acco

in educations by influed environmef schooling for the prom(Edmonds

evelopment 2009) Mucls impact a agement andnt of the resce of teacherMoorman 2rect but a aters amp Mcis importan

n this humant mission

m of educatidecisions of

ip Is a Matt

ffects are ineate to a set oorganizationed in the ligstudents te

utcomes andnd concepter include ldquo

eviewing ske the concepeffort and aas the pupirstand schoe at nation

In

cus mainly oriticism sc

terms of impof it do notd services toording to tn policy ageencing the ment Effectiv

(OECD 2motion of the

1979) Schoof the qua

ch of the pvariety of ted academic sults of the rs by creatin

2008) Moresignificant

cNulty 200nt and the acan potential

In additionional leaderthe educati

ter of Relat

evitably intof criteria ann undoubtedght of the peachers admd the role ofts regardingldquocompetentkilled appropt of effectaccomplishmls performa

ools effectinal examina

nternational R

on the deficchool leadeproving theit revise-chao all studentthe standardendas internmotivations

ve school lea008) The r

e objectives ool leader ility and chrevious reseeacher charaemphasis (Bschool havng the appreover resea

impact on5 Robinsonchievement and the furt

n the differrship such aonal leader

tive but Con

erconnectednd parametedly has mulositive andministrativef educationag education accountabopriatenessiveness a vments For ance in the veness in tations Soc

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

ciency of eders do not ir teaching pange their o

nts while finds (Elmorenationally Its and capacadership is erole of edu of educatio

is considereharacter of aearch demoacteristics fBird et al 2

ving the potropriate climarch has detn student ouon Lloyd ampt of the objecther planninrent groups as teachersas we can s

ncurrently D

d with the ners The exeltiple recipi

dor negativee staff the al leader arenal effectivbility devel efficiency

very broad mexample thfinal examithe way thciety possib

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ducation respond

practices outdated nally not 2002) t plays a cities of essential ucational on and is d as one a school onstrates from job 2009) It tential to mate and termined utcomes

amp Rows ctives of ng for its

that are pupils see from

Different

necessity ercise of ents and e effects broader

e crucial eness is lopment

y quality meaning e school inations e pupils bly will

observeCommomarkersspecificstaff byteachersmaximuparentaproductnever pand sucMany omissionStrongeeducatioin relatiGrigsbyespeciaMapp 22015 PAlso othschool u(Catanoexperienof strateperceptsmooth materiacollaborthrough(1999) learningmutual confideof the influencinformaEducatiof systethroughperformmemberinforma

e the schoolonwealth Ses of interncally describy the heads structuredum communl and comtive divisionpossible for ccessful (Drof the internn and achieve 2006) Thonal schooion to many y Peters 20lly in relati2002 Leith

Portin et alher researchunit (Macbeo amp Strongnce in matteegies and mion of scho

operation al-Guide to eration inter

hout the eduan effectiveg opportunirespect set

ence createsschool hasce the memation collabional leaderems that enshout a set ofmance evalurs of work fation to info

ls effectiveecretariat (1nal performbes the indi the involvd lessons inication betmmunity inn of laboura school w

rucker 2012ationally ac

vement of ghe role of ll and the endifferent pa

015) creatinion to studehwood 200 2009) and hers looked eath 2001)ge 2006) ers of admin

methods and ool as a livi

as well aeducationalrest that conucational ce director mities It hasts goals ands positive ps the ability

mbers of theborate with rship and msure the impf integrated puation can onfit into the worm educati

eness in term1993) in its mance worcators of Sc

vement of tntellectuallytween teachnvolvementr among teawhich does 2) ccepted charoals are theleadership intire educatiarameters sng a sense ent outcom2 Leithwoteachers exat the effec the correlaThe effec

nistration anexpertise inng organism

as to the p act c) to juntribute to tommunity

motivates stus a stable ad conducts pleasant andy to guide school com

pupils paremanagement plementatiopractices innly be optimwhole organonal policy

74

ms of the g report descrking extechool Effecthe heads oy challengi

hers and pupt positive achers and not meet th

racteristics oe product ofin educatioion systemsuch as the sof commun

mes for exaood et al 20xpectations ctiveness ofation betwective directnd educationn economicm where thperception ustice undethe developm(Stravakou

udents and eadministrativ

them has d creative cstudents an

mmunity anents teachinprocesses

on of educatn order to acmised throunization sys

y and strateg

In

good moral cribes the sernal concectiveness asof departmeng teaching

pils efficienclimate c

good parenhe expectati

of school eff an effectivn is of cata and its effe

school climanity in schoample pupil004 OECDfrom the sch

f leadership een evaluatitor possessn and skills cs constructe human faof the ana

erstanding lment of stro 2003) Aseducators anve path crflexibility limate rationd enforce

nd to lead thng staff andinvolve the

tional policihieve speci

ugh a clear ustem It lookgy and invol

nternational R

mannersrsquo ochool effec

erns and s ldquoPurposefuent the invg work-cennt and accurconsistency

ntal reportrdquoions of soc

fficiency sucve school leaalytic imporectiveness hate (Cliffordol (Beck amps achievem

D 2013 Allehool leader through sel

ion and perfes profounconsisting otion and othactor is the alytical proleniency apong interpers they say nd promoteedibility crand takes ionally mana

disciplinehem to posiother bodie

e arrangemeies strategiefic educatiounderstandinks at how mlves the app

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of the childrctiveness asstaff outputful leadershivolvement ntered envirrate record ky among t Nevertheleciety to be e

uch as sharedadership (C

ortance for bhas been resd et al 2012

amp Foster 19ment (Henden Grigsby(Thompson

lf-assessmenformance stnd knowledof a) the poher matters bkey to bala

ogram as appreciation rsonal relatEverard amp

es the offer reates a cliinitiatives Iages the eco has the abitive resultses ent and depes and actio

onal targetsng of how d

managementplication of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ren The general t More ip of the of other ronment keeping teachers ess it is effective

d vision Catano amp both the searched 2 Allen 999) and erson amp

y Peters n 2017) nt of the tandards dge and ssession b) in the

ance and a single respect

ionships Morris

of equal imate of It shows onomics bility to

s collect

loyment on plans Process different t gathers systems

standardprocesswith debe effedecisionfurther Hence quantitasuch as could b23 ThePoints 231 ScUntil th1967-741980s school awere mimplemevaluatipedagogeducatioand evenon-impforms self-eva2017 pit was vas puniautonom232 SeStartingself-evaschoolsDecisiois requi233 TeIn paralteacher their tensubject relevant

ds coverings performanesirable resuectively hanns at all m(Schoderbean evaluati

ative criteriaacademic ae more effee Evaluatio

chool and The 1980s tea4 military rand againstadvisors wa

meant to unmented A la

ion was nogical guidaonal evaluaen some stuplementatioof educatioaluation of 56) But ac

very hard to itive and comy (IEP 20elf-Evaluatig from the 2aluation becs The legislon 30972Γ1red to set iteacher Apprllel to schoappraisal s

nure in posto appraisa

t education

g quality mnce is well dults then genndled and c

management ek Cosier ampion of leadea of achieveand adminisective objecon of Educa

Teacher Evaacher evaluaregime inst this historas introducendertake thater law (Lat implemen

ance and sution in schoudents and on in practional evaluaschool unit

ccording to Idevelop a c

ontrolling m016) ion of Schoo201314 schcame complation (Circu105-03-201ts own educraisal ol self-evalystem to be

sts of respoal by their advisors on

management documentednerates factcontinuousllevels that

amp Aplin 198er effectiveement towarstrative stafctively accoational Syst

luation in Gation was thpection becrical backgred Accordihe evaluatiow 1566 of

nted during tupport to teools were me

parents leaice In the ation focuss rather thaInstitute of Eculture of evmeans jeop

ols hool year anpulsory for ulars 3097314) states thational goal

uation a pre implemennsibility Arespective

n education

75

systems (Ld and analyss on the basly improvet in turn im88) eness based rds targets wff students ountable mtem in Gre

Greece he job of schcame assocround insping to the thon of the e1985) whicthe 1980s Seachers Sevet with fiercading eithe2000s the sing on than on indivEducationalvaluation ofpardising ra

nd followinr all types C105-03-

hat at the bels and plan

residential dnted from 20According to

line managnal matters

In

Lewis Goosed with a msis of whichd This fun

mprove edu

in transparwhich have b

school commetricate andeece A Sho

hool inspectciated with pection washen law (Leducationalch also incluSchool adviveral attemce oppositior to their foemphasis c

he evaluatiovidual teachl Policy the f them and aather than r

ng a two-yeof pre-prim2013 1900ginning of ehow to reac

decree (PD01415 linko this propogers on admso a teache

nternational R

odman amp Fmethodical h the procesnctional infucational pr

rent objectibeen set fro

mmunity incd broader acort Retrospe

tors and parpolitical coabolished

1304 of 198l system buded referesors concenpts in the

on by teacheormal invalchanged to on of educhers (Verdis

context remassessment einforcing

ar pilot promary prima89C110-1each schoolch them (OE

D 1522013ked to teachosal educatministrativeerrsquos appraisa

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Fandt 1995)way and co

sses in quesformation srocess perfo

ive qualitaom all stake corporating ccepted modection and

rticularly duontrol In th and the sy82) school but this waences to eduntrated on pr1990s to in

ersrsquo unions lidation or more parti

cational wos 2002) in mained one i

as it was ofschool and

oject annuaary and se2-2013 Mil year everyECD 2017

3) introducehersrsquo promotion staff w

e matters aal would be

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

) When ompared stion can supports ormance

tive and holders parents

del Critical

uring the he early ystem of advisors

as never ucational roviding ntroduce teachers to their

icipative ork and (OECD in which ften seen d teacher

al school econdary inisterial y school p 56)

ed a new tion and

would be and their e carried

out by tthe direform ofoppositreductioprocessevaluati56) Over threformsoften famajor gobjectivreliableeffectivmeasurilearningnationaOECD In Greesystemshave thStrengthRecentllow in Gschool school accountof respoand deeducatiocooperaconfirmmainly To thisadminisinvited 234 EdAt this leadershlegislatievaluatiincludin

the school hector of eduf the appraision by manons due to ts of school sion process

he past years in educatioailed to makglobal resulves are conce indicatorsveness of Ging the qualg outcomes l assessmen 2017 p 9

ece accordis in Europehe least auhening scholy there havGreece eduleaders in Gself-evalua

tability (OEonsibility asevelopment onal leaderation with

med also by a recipient

s point it istration is sto lead (Muducational Lpoint howehip in Greeion Accordion of the ng the exe

head and reucation and sal report weny teachers athe crisis) Tself-evaluaties includin

rs Greek goon effectiveke a real imlts as far ascerned News are in plGreek educality and effeas there are

nts nor exte 53) ng to OECD

e which funuthority comool leadersh

ve been moducational ouGreece curration shoul

ECD 2017 s key to inc

of teacher itself 3) other schoo Papanaoumand executois worth m

sometimes nulford 2003Leadership ever it is aece is definding to the Pdirectors oercise of a

levant schothe relevanere defined and by teachThe teacherion previou

ng school se

overnmentseness Howe

mpact on thes the perforw laws havlace to proation systemectiveness oe neither external evalua

D (2011 pctions ineffmpared to hip is one odest moves utcomes remrently haveld be reinp 7) The a

creasing theer quality

strategic mols The abm (1995) wor of circulamentioning not due to i3) Evaluation

appropriate tned throughPresidential of school unadministrativ

76

ool advisor rnt educationcentrally Thersrsquo unionrsrsquo unions thusly perceivlf-evaluatio

s have sougever wheree quality andrmance of sve often beeovide inform The sysof the educaternal assesations of sc

p 24) we hafectively Oother coun

of the mosttowards de

main weak e limited resntroduced agencys OE

e effectivene2) objecti

managemenbove claim which statesars and orde

that to a its leaders

to mentionh the perspeDecree (PD

nits is carrve and org

In

respectivelyn advisor ThThis teacher ns (in the cohen reacted

ved in position were lsquofro

ght to addree reforms had efficiencystudents anden enacted brmation onstem cannoation systemssments of lechools and t

ave one of tOne of the antries is in t crucial chacentralizatioand the syssponsibilitietogether w

ECD (2011)ess of the Dives evalunt of financ

on the ces that the ders for all th

large extebut to the v

how the efective by thD 1522013ied out in ganisational

nternational R

y and that ohe criteria appraisal syntext of edu

d against theve terms Aozenrsquo in 201

ss a numbeave been inty of the systd the achievbut not fullyn the qualit rely on c

m and the actearning basteaching (O

the most cereas in whimanaging

allenges foron but whistem is still es and there

with some ) research id

Director 1) ation and cial and huntralized edirector at the main issue

ent the defvery system

ffectivenesshe framewo3 FEK Α 2five categol work wit

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of a school proceduresystem was mucation expe newly est

All these edu15 (OECD

er of issues troduced thtem and to vement of y implemenity efficienconsistent ttual achievesed on stand

OECD 2011

entralized edich school d

human rer education ile dropout r

highly cenre is consen

form of dentified fosupport evaccountabi

uman resouducation syhe Greek Ses of responficiency in

m in which

s of the eduork of the

24005-11-2ories of parthin the leg

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

head by and the met with enditure ablished

ucational 2017 p

through hey have produce learning nted No ncy and ools for ement of dardized 1 p 14

ducation directors esources

reform rates are

ntralized nsus that external

our areas valuation ility for urces 4) ystem is chool is

nsibility n school they are

ucational relevant 013) the rameters gislative

framewclimate conductAccordprocessits objecperformstandardeffectivfor eachof the sregionaevaluatiand stuintegratevaluatisystem 24 ConSo far iidentifieparametdetermito take that it aand thoeducatioresponsas well defines educatioIn summdirectorthe relework Tand in tof climachievinschool effectivproceduother wshould characte

work the exeand pedag

ting teachiing to Saϊti

s of evaluatinctives and t

mance standds and d) co

veness OECh region to ischool netwal director foion and assudent assesting studention school of assessme

nsiderationsit is understed with sufters and cerining the criinto accoun

affects in ororough as ponal leaderssibilities as as from theclear criter

onal adminimary we crs of school evant legislaThe effectivethe level of

mate and atting the objecleaders and

veness of higures as well

words whenconsider theristics of th

ercise of thegogy of theing and ev (2008 p ng the qualitargets and tdards (b) morrecting de

CD (2011 pimprove the

work to estaor making ssessment frassment balt formative aself evaluatent and evas About Dratood that thefficient objertainly not aiteria for thnt as far as rder procespossible Alship we musthey raised e Greek mairia of effectiistration and

can observeunits has b

ation makeseness also hdevelopmenitudes It isctives that ad their leadgh-level eduas common

n we refer tohis as a dyhe personal

e work of sue school unvaluating s15) the eva

ity of the edthe process

measuring peviations Am 43) recom

e efficiency ablish perfostep-by-stepamework stlancing extassessment tion with a vluation base

awing the Ase effectivenectively to a

a concept whe effectivenpossible obs off assesslso in the st take into afrom both tinly legislativeness whid less as crithat the ev

een done bos it clear thhas to do wint of the hums understoore come witdership stylucation pren acceptableo the concepynamic comity of the le

77

upervision annit planningstudents scaluation of

ducation proof such con

performancemong other

mmended toof the use o

ormance agp progress totudent asseternal and in the evalu

view to desied on resultssessment o

ness of educa large extehich is non-ness of the ebjective andsing leadersh

criticism waccount boththe various tion governich are set miteria evaluavaluation anoth at adminhat the direcith meeting

uman resourd from the th appropriale which isesuppose thee criteria forpt of effectmplex funceader and hi

In

nd evaluatiog organizecientific anthe educativided and thntrol consise (c) compar measures i Greece wa

of human regreements boward agreessment by ateacher-bas

uation and aigning and its and outcoof Educationcational leadent compar-measurableeducationald measurablhip to be as

we can exerh the admindefinitions

ning the opemore as objeation nd assessmenistrative anctor provideobjectives bces of educabove that

ate behavious exercisede existencer assessing thtive educatioction basedis team cult

nternational R

on the evalu and prepa

nd professioonal projecthe degree ofts of four staring the mn order to e

as to set goaesources andetween the ed goals imaligning edused assessmassessment mplementin

omes nal Leadersdership is a rative and me theoretica

administrale criteria os meritocratrt on the e

nistrative sidwe have seration of edectives and

ent of the end teaching es administrboth at the aational unitt effectivenurs particul Maintaininof commonhe quality aonal leaders

d on foundature and ma

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

uation of tharation of teonal devel

ct is the conf implementages a) Se

measuremenenhance eduals and bencd the rationa Ministry a

mplementatiducational stments of lframeworkng a compre

ship Effectivconcept tha

multiple crital and subjeation it is neof all the adtic fair meeffectivenesde off the leaet for the leaducational ucompetence

effectiveneslevel provi

trative and tadministratits and the foness is the rlar characterng the qua

nly acceptedand effectiveship evaluaations suchaturity of th

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

he school eaching lopment ntinuous tation of tting the

nt to the ucational chmarks alization and each on of an tandards learning teacher ehensive

veness at can be teria and ctive In ecessary dressees asurable s of the adership adership

units and es of the

ss of the ided that teaching ive level ormation result of ristics of

ality and d control eness In

ation we h as the

he group

with a sa constr3 Meth31 A SuAssessistakehoaffects into accother pafollowsbe holisand recspecificconcernthe recithereforeach of be muchwill incand shomulti-shoutside multitudThe evadirectioobjectivMore spexamplcriteria performsuch as of rightA seconthe genperformwith thsynergistrengthsuitablewith otprofessi

set specific ructive objehodology uggestion foing the effecolders Whe

then the procount all thearties and ths that a modstic and muipients that

c quantitativning the respipients of thre be differe

f them accorh more effe

clude the criortcomings hareholding

of the edude and divealuation of

on of a sve-directionpecifically e students of the pe

mance of pupanalytical

t attitudes annd goal in a

neral schoolmance or effhe local comes with othehening of re school climther interesional bodies

targets and ectively and

for a Holisticctiveness ofn the evaluocess is incoe addresseeshe respectiv

del of evaluaultifaceted it the educatve and qualipective recihe educatioent as well rding to the rective objecisis concurrof leadersh

g assessmenucational e

ersity of the effectivenepecific obj

n a first goastudent com

erformance pils in the vasynthetic cnd the shapianother direl communityfectiveness ommunity aner schools crelations anmate engagsted schools organizat

the objectivd defined pr

c Educationf educationaation relies omplete uns and does nve objectiveation of the ie to includional leaderitative criteripient and b

onal leadersas the criterespective octive meritently of ma

hip on focunt At the sanvironmentparties and

ess in educajective and

al in a specmmunity In

or effectivarious courscritical thinking of a cultction of eduy In this dof the educand the insticreation of

nd cooperatgement in exs or grouptions

78

ves pursuedrocess

nal Leadersal leadership

only to onenambiguousnot consideres and targeteducationalde to the furship influeria for the ebring about ship are maeria of effecobjectives thtocratic muany differenused issues ame time itt possible i

d evaluation ational leadd subseque

cific directin this directiveness of ses and finaking and abture ucational le

direction theational leadeitutions thea climate of

tion with thxtracurricul

ps such as

In

d respectivel

ship Evaluatp is a procese aspect wh

s and contror the implicts set by thel leadership

ullest extentences and frffectivenesssignificant

any and diffctiveness of hat will putulti-faceted int sides will

and will lim will operatinterventionmembers w

dership is a ent to the

ion of educion the indivthe educati

al exams theility knowl

adership cae individualership can be associatiof cooperatiohe parents lar activitiesthe structu

nternational R

ly in a give

tion Model ss that involhich the eduversial becaations effecem In the li to be fair apossible a

rom each ins of the eduresults to e

ferent fromf the educati Such an evintegrated al highlight smit biased cte in a restrn effort duwhich are ac

function ofe individua

cational leadvidual objecional leadee developmeledge acquis

an be for exl objectivesbe the develon of parenton the visioof pupils ts the netwoures of the

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

en time peri

lves many d

ucational leaause it does cts of leadeight of the aand effectivall interestednterested siducational leaeach of them

m each otherional leader

valuation moand functionspecific weacriticism durictive formue preciselyctively invof the generaal criteria

dership canctives and thership may ent of specifsition deve

xample pars and criterilopment of r

nts networkon of the schthe formati

orking of th local com

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

od with

different adership not take

ership on above it e should d parties de to set adership m Since r it will rship for odel will nal as it aknesses ue to its

m in any y to the

olved al initial of this

n be for herefore

be the fic skills

elopment

ents and ia of the relations king and hool the ion of a e school

mmunity

A third and admindividuleadershattitudeadminisleadershefficienparticipattainmA fourthcurrentindividuleadershapplicatthis theplanninthe limi4 DesigThe prothe effIndicatothis resAdminiadvancidevelopconstrumeaninThis wosupportthey leaand opethe jobthe mosThe evaweightiholistic educatiocommucommuwith intof onlyevaluati

goal in anoministrative ual objectivhip can be

es and behastrative pership is exer

ncy the reipation of th

ment of the ph goal in an regulated ual objectivhip can betion of the ee fulfilment ng organisaitation and egning the Eoposed modfectiveness ors amp Standspectively istration (20ing school p and supporct approprigful work oork requiretsmdashthe profarn and worerations of th educationast productivaluation moiness factorsmodel of e

onal community ie stunity ie parternal or exty a few coion of scho

ther directiocommunity

ves and crithe developaviours thsonnel are sarcised the inforcementhem in takpedagogical nother direceducation

ves and crie the unhinexisting eduof the organ

ation coordielimination Evaluation del should in

of the edudards) depen

Besides a015) whichleadership

rt teachers iate organizoutside of ths education

fessional caprk family anhe school T

al leaders neve and benefdel can alsos in each indvaluation o

munity ie tudents or rents assocternal evalu

ountries in ools and tea

on of educay ie teacheiteria of thpment of teeir empowatisfied by tstrengtheni

t of teamwking decisio

and operatiction of edupolicy of t

iteria of thndered funcucational legnisational aination and of any formModel of Enclude clearucational l

nding on theaccording th is a cons educationcreate positzational pol

he classroomnal leaders tpacity of teand communThus given teed new stanficial to studo be flexibledividual dirf educationateachers anpupils depiation of pa

uators BesidEurope wi

aching or in

79

ational leadeers and admhe performaachers skil

werment thetheir work ting of thei

work and coons accordiional goals

ucational leathe Ministr

he performactional orggislation wi

and other objd operation om of delinquEducationar objectivesleadership e particular to USA Nsortium of nal leaders tive workinglicies and

m that has a pto build anachers and snity engagemthis growingndards to gudents e and adjustrection or gral leadershind or profending on

arents and tdes accordiithout externdeed any

In

ership can bministrative pance or efflls the creae extent tothe degree or knowledgooperation ing to the respectively

adership canry and the ance or effanizational ith the minijectives setof the schoouency al Leadershs and corres(EKPIS Eeducational

National Poprofessionaduties and

g conditionssystems anpowerful imd strengthestaff the proment and eg knowledguide their pr

table enabliroup of criteip will be abfessors adm

the educatthe structuring to OECrnal assessmother comp

nternational R

e for examppersonnel Ifectiveness tion and cu

o which boof satisfactioge the impbetween thleadership

y n be the impcountry In

fectiveness structure o

mum possib the observol within th

hip Effectivponding cri

Educational l level and tholicy Boardal organizatd actions ins effectivelynd engage

mpact on whn a networkofessional cffective effe and the ch

ractice in dir

ing it to regueria Accordble to includministrative tional levele of the MiD (2011 pment of le

parative me

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

mple the eduIn this direcof the edu

ultivation ofoth academon from theprovement hem the in

style appl

plementation this direcof the eduof the schble deviatio

vance of prohe financial

veness iteria for ev

Key Perfohe specific nd for Edutions commnvolve reley allocate rein other d

hat happens rk of organicommunity ificient manahanging demrections tha

gulate and foding to the de as evalua staff the l the localinistry of Ed 14) Greecearning or echanism of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ucational tion the

ucational f correct

mics and way the of their

ncreased lied the

on of the ction the ucational ool the

ons from cedures budget

valuating ormance needs of

ucational mitted to entlessly esources eep and inside it

izational in which agement

mands of at will be

ormulate above a

ators the student

l school ducation ce is one external

f quality

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

leadershinfluencthe resuwho affwhich istudy aeducatioevaluatiimpact manageIt is of aeffectivEducaticommuthese stinfluenclearningcivilizatof schoeducatioto facilimprove

Keywo

1 Intro11 StatMany aeducatiosecondahave bethis situcompreaims toobjectiv12 MeaThe conacademSchoolsthat plaSleegerleadershsignificand ov

hip influencced recipienults of it Thfected by eis structureda relative lonal leaderion model of educati

erial staff ana great impo

veness for aional leader

unity Hencetake holderce in severag outcomestion and ev

ool leaders onal leaderlitate criterie education

rds Educat

oduction tement of thattempts thonal leaderary and higheen raised fruation contiehensive wao create an ave measuraasuring the ncept of ed

mics researcs in order toay a substars 2012) Nhip with an

cant efforts wer-time acc

ce and affecnts by educhus has beeducational d with particliterature rership presento be impleonal leader

nd students ortance to hall levels ofrs affect mae a broaders due to the

al micro and school cli

ventually nacould prov

to recognisia for impr

nal efficienc

tional leade

he Problem ahrow yearsrship effecther educati

rom academinues The may to measuappropriate able and com

Effectiveneducational lchers and edo check impantial role everthelessn acceptablwere made ceptable ev

ct direct or cational leaden designed leaders comcular questieview and nting whilemented in rship effectof an educa

have an evaluf education

any recipienr evaluatione fact that d macroeconimate localational econvide better use competenrovement oy

ership Mana

and Purposhave tried

tiveness inon Several

mic communmain issue iure the effec

assessmentmparative cress of Educaleadership aducational oprovement pin school many remale objectivin the direc

valuation m

71

indirect resdership coua model ba

mplimentedions for eac

a draft ofle the ultim

n real sampltiveness wiational orgaluation modn such as pnts such as sn model shoeducationalnomic criticl society bonomy compeunderstandi

nces to discovercome o

agement Ev

se of the Stud to evalu

n Greece inl evaluation

nity many chis if there cctiveness oft model of riteria ational Leadand its effeorganizationprocess ofteeffectiveneains to be de and effecction of this

model resul

In

spectively uld be the mased on the d with a quch broad catf a pilot evmate target le of particith respect nization

del for assesrimary secstudents facould involvl leadershipcal results sonds teacheetiveness Aing of the j

close weaknobstacles an

valuation m

udy uate and asn all level

n systems hahanges and ould be a trf educationeducational

dership ectiveness hns over timen examineess (Bruggeone in Greective systems however lting in ma

nternational R

The core idmost approp

most signifestionnaire tegory of stvaluation m

is in a focipants in oto subordin

sing the educondary andculty membve assessmep has a greasuch as studers behaviouA transparenjob left to esses in ord

nd eventual

model Effici

ssess educas of educaave organizfailures havransparent al leadershil leadership

has been stume from pas

the variousencate Luyece in assessm since dedid not resu

any reaction

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

dea is that tpriate evaluaficant stakeas evaluati

take holdersmodel in aollowing storder to prenates of ac

ucational lead higher edbers academent criteria at direct or dents achievurs ethics nt evaluatiobe done fo

der to work olly to prom

iency Effec

ational resuation particzed many rve been realstructured ip Thus th

p effectiven

udied by scst years untis leadership

yten Scheesing the eduespite the fult in a conns being r

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

the most ators for e holders ion tool s In this assessing tudy the esent the cademic

adership ducation mics and from all indirect

vements culture n model or every on them

mote and

ctiveness

ults and cular in

reactions ized and fair and

his study ess with

cientists il today p factors erens amp ucational fact that sistently aised in

particulsituationfaces a historicevaluatiand disdevelopissue ofeducatiomeasuraand its accountleadersh13 EduMany tiwhat arwhen aeffectivpossiblethese cathese in2 ReseThe genleadershquantitatry to prelevantResearcleadershand leadResearcobjectivResearcquantita21 InteAccordconstaneducatioon themhas becleadersfurther

lar with regan in such anmajor chal

cally been dion culture tstribution op reflectionf evaluatingonal managable concreevaluation it the overallhip defininucational Leimes there are those critea leader is veness of ee in order an be set fondividual criearch Questneral researhip is a resuative criteriaprovide a rt literature rch question hip Can thdership ch question ve and clearch questionative manneerest in Educing to Leith

ntly growinonal proces

m is sought ome deman The contininvolvemen

ard to the obn important llenge in dedistrusted that takes ref responsib draw conc

g the effectivgement andte criteria Mis studied thl educationa

ng specific eeadership Efare a varietyeria which d

effective ducational to realize w

or assessing iteria tions rch hypotheult which coa and indicaesponse thrreview 1 Who are

hey be credib

2 Could tr criteria andn 3 Can ther and evalucational Lehwood and

ng In theirss are systemAlso anoth

nding there nuous flow nt with it an

bjectivity ofissue is flui

eveloping aparticularly

esults as the bility (OECclusions andveness of edd leadershipMore specifhrough the dal environmefficacy criteEffectivenessy of questiondetermine leor not Thleadership

whether in ethe effectiv

esis in this sould be meaators Thererough the p

the most apble judges o

the outcomed which arehese criteriuated objectadership anRiehl (200view this

matically inher reason foare constanof the resu

d its results

72

f the assessmid and often

a culture ofy by the te first criterio

CD 2011 pd finally foducational lp correlatinfically the edesign of a

ment in all itseria accordis A Term Wns about leaeadership ashis study awith as cl

education cveness of ed

study is whasurable ade are three mprovision o

ppropriate raof the effec

es of the ede these ia be creditively nd Its Impor03) interests is becausnvestigatedor the intensntly changesults of varios On the oth

In

ment methon changeablf evaluationeaching proon or the bap 45) Thisormulate coeadership Ang the effeeffectivenesstandard ev

s dimensioning to those

With Several adership fors effective attempts toearly and a

can be estabducational l

hether the efdequately demain researf informati

aters of the tiveness of

ducational l

ible identif

rtance t in the fielse on the on the othe

se interest ins resulting ious researchher hand th

nternational R

ods and the ce Accordin

n as externaofession Oasis for imprs research ncrete propAim of this ectiveness oss of the eduvaluation mns and all poe recipients

Meanings r example ifor in a more

describe adequately blished objeleadership a

ffectivenessefined by relch questionon that wil

educationalthe educati

leadership b

fied set w

ld of educatone hand er hand then the field ofin new challhes on leadeis results in

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

criteria and ng to OECDal evaluatio

Overall therprovement st

was carriedposals on thwork is to fof leadershucational lea

model that taotential recip

f this is effee simplifiedand delinedefined cri

ective criterand which c

s of the edulative quali

ns on whichll emerge f

l administraional admin

be measurab

with qualitat

ational leadethe results

e leadersrsquo inf education lenges emer

dership reignn increased c

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

thus the D Greece ons have re is no trategies d out to he major focus on hip with adership akes into pients of

ective or d version eate the iteria as ria how could be

ucational tative or

h we will from the

ation and nistration

ble with

tive and

ership is s of the nfluence is that it

rging for nites the criticism

of schooexecutivsuccessthey doadminisevaluateSchool key rolteachersto imprleadershone of tof the m(Cohenthat a prsatisfachas veryinfluencworkingthat pri(Halling2008) Tthe schosmooth involveparentsthe listi22 EvaCriteriaThe pheof achieeducatiothereforto all oschool cfor all undergoimproveand perwhich mhead mOn the behave

ol educatioves Accor

sfully to the o not adequstrative strued-accountaleadership h

le in impros as well asrove the effhip is considthe success most influe McCabe rincipalrsquos le

ction and effy high impace the motivg environmincipal leadger amp HeckThe role of tool unit theoperation

ed or are r depend to ng of the re

aluation of Ea of Effectivenomenon oeving the reonal leadersre its effectof them Focommunityof them A

one which ement evalrformancerdquomakes senseay identify other sideat home a

onal leaders ding to theguidance of

uately explouctures do nable to a shas become

oving schoos the school ficiency anddered very ifactors of th

ential factorMichelli amp

eadership styficacy to levact on the imvation and p

ment (Pont Ndership cank 1996 Mathe leader ine creation of

constitute recipients oa large exte

elevant bibliEducationaveness of leadershiesults whichship in an etiveness muor example educationaA number frequently luation mo All these te to be connschools eff parentsrsquo cand their p

and findinge school lef their suboroit new technot provide atisfactory

e a priority iol outcomesclimate andd equity ofimportant fohe schools (rs in the deamp Pickeral yle and skillvels of engamprovemenperformancNusche amp M

have indirarzano Wan education f a vision inan importanf any form ent on the diography l Leadership

p and its efh in turn reladucational o

ust be studie pupils or al policy ouof terms anamong othenitoring reterms makenected with fectiveness could underperformance

73

gs which foceadership crdinates in thnologies othe requiredextent acco

in educations by influed environmef schooling for the prom(Edmonds

evelopment 2009) Mucls impact a agement andnt of the resce of teacherMoorman 2rect but a aters amp Mcis importan

n this humant mission

m of educatidecisions of

ip Is a Matt

ffects are ineate to a set oorganizationed in the ligstudents te

utcomes andnd concepter include ldquo

eviewing ske the concepeffort and aas the pupirstand schoe at nation

In

cus mainly oriticism sc

terms of impof it do notd services toording to tn policy ageencing the ment Effectiv

(OECD 2motion of the

1979) Schoof the qua

ch of the pvariety of ted academic sults of the rs by creatin

2008) Moresignificant

cNulty 200nt and the acan potential

In additionional leaderthe educati

ter of Relat

evitably intof criteria ann undoubtedght of the peachers admd the role ofts regardingldquocompetentkilled appropt of effectaccomplishmls performa

ools effectinal examina

nternational R

on the deficchool leadeproving theit revise-chao all studentthe standardendas internmotivations

ve school lea008) The r

e objectives ool leader ility and chrevious reseeacher charaemphasis (Bschool havng the appreover resea

impact on5 Robinsonchievement and the furt

n the differrship such aonal leader

tive but Con

erconnectednd parametedly has mulositive andministrativef educationag education accountabopriatenessiveness a vments For ance in the veness in tations Soc

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

ciency of eders do not ir teaching pange their o

nts while finds (Elmorenationally Its and capacadership is erole of edu of educatio

is considereharacter of aearch demoacteristics fBird et al 2

ving the potropriate climarch has detn student ouon Lloyd ampt of the objecther planninrent groups as teachersas we can s

ncurrently D

d with the ners The exeltiple recipi

dor negativee staff the al leader arenal effectivbility devel efficiency

very broad mexample thfinal examithe way thciety possib

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ducation respond

practices outdated nally not 2002) t plays a cities of essential ucational on and is d as one a school onstrates from job 2009) It tential to mate and termined utcomes

amp Rows ctives of ng for its

that are pupils see from

Different

necessity ercise of ents and e effects broader

e crucial eness is lopment

y quality meaning e school inations e pupils bly will

observeCommomarkersspecificstaff byteachersmaximuparentaproductnever pand sucMany omissionStrongeeducatioin relatiGrigsbyespeciaMapp 22015 PAlso othschool u(Catanoexperienof strateperceptsmooth materiacollaborthrough(1999) learningmutual confideof the influencinformaEducatiof systethroughperformmemberinforma

e the schoolonwealth Ses of interncally describy the heads structuredum communl and comtive divisionpossible for ccessful (Drof the internn and achieve 2006) Thonal schooion to many y Peters 20lly in relati2002 Leith

Portin et alher researchunit (Macbeo amp Strongnce in matteegies and mion of scho

operation al-Guide to eration inter

hout the eduan effectiveg opportunirespect set

ence createsschool hasce the memation collabional leaderems that enshout a set ofmance evalurs of work fation to info

ls effectiveecretariat (1nal performbes the indi the involvd lessons inication betmmunity inn of laboura school w

rucker 2012ationally ac

vement of ghe role of ll and the endifferent pa

015) creatinion to studehwood 200 2009) and hers looked eath 2001)ge 2006) ers of admin

methods and ool as a livi

as well aeducationalrest that conucational ce director mities It hasts goals ands positive ps the ability

mbers of theborate with rship and msure the impf integrated puation can onfit into the worm educati

eness in term1993) in its mance worcators of Sc

vement of tntellectuallytween teachnvolvementr among teawhich does 2) ccepted charoals are theleadership intire educatiarameters sng a sense ent outcom2 Leithwoteachers exat the effec the correlaThe effec

nistration anexpertise inng organism

as to the p act c) to juntribute to tommunity

motivates stus a stable ad conducts pleasant andy to guide school com

pupils paremanagement plementatiopractices innly be optimwhole organonal policy

74

ms of the g report descrking extechool Effecthe heads oy challengi

hers and pupt positive achers and not meet th

racteristics oe product ofin educatioion systemsuch as the sof commun

mes for exaood et al 20xpectations ctiveness ofation betwective directnd educationn economicm where thperception ustice undethe developm(Stravakou

udents and eadministrativ

them has d creative cstudents an

mmunity anents teachinprocesses

on of educatn order to acmised throunization sys

y and strateg

In

good moral cribes the sernal concectiveness asof departmeng teaching

pils efficienclimate c

good parenhe expectati

of school eff an effectivn is of cata and its effe

school climanity in schoample pupil004 OECDfrom the sch

f leadership een evaluatitor possessn and skills cs constructe human faof the ana

erstanding lment of stro 2003) Aseducators anve path crflexibility limate rationd enforce

nd to lead thng staff andinvolve the

tional policihieve speci

ugh a clear ustem It lookgy and invol

nternational R

mannersrsquo ochool effec

erns and s ldquoPurposefuent the invg work-cennt and accurconsistency

ntal reportrdquoions of soc

fficiency sucve school leaalytic imporectiveness hate (Cliffordol (Beck amps achievem

D 2013 Allehool leader through sel

ion and perfes profounconsisting otion and othactor is the alytical proleniency apong interpers they say nd promoteedibility crand takes ionally mana

disciplinehem to posiother bodie

e arrangemeies strategiefic educatiounderstandinks at how mlves the app

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of the childrctiveness asstaff outputful leadershivolvement ntered envirrate record ky among t Nevertheleciety to be e

uch as sharedadership (C

ortance for bhas been resd et al 2012

amp Foster 19ment (Henden Grigsby(Thompson

lf-assessmenformance stnd knowledof a) the poher matters bkey to bala

ogram as appreciation rsonal relatEverard amp

es the offer reates a cliinitiatives Iages the eco has the abitive resultses ent and depes and actio

onal targetsng of how d

managementplication of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ren The general t More ip of the of other ronment keeping teachers ess it is effective

d vision Catano amp both the searched 2 Allen 999) and erson amp

y Peters n 2017) nt of the tandards dge and ssession b) in the

ance and a single respect

ionships Morris

of equal imate of It shows onomics bility to

s collect

loyment on plans Process different t gathers systems

standardprocesswith debe effedecisionfurther Hence quantitasuch as could b23 ThePoints 231 ScUntil th1967-741980s school awere mimplemevaluatipedagogeducatioand evenon-impforms self-eva2017 pit was vas puniautonom232 SeStartingself-evaschoolsDecisiois requi233 TeIn paralteacher their tensubject relevant

ds coverings performanesirable resuectively hanns at all m(Schoderbean evaluati

ative criteriaacademic ae more effee Evaluatio

chool and The 1980s tea4 military rand againstadvisors wa

meant to unmented A la

ion was nogical guidaonal evaluaen some stuplementatioof educatioaluation of 56) But ac

very hard to itive and comy (IEP 20elf-Evaluatig from the 2aluation becs The legislon 30972Γ1red to set iteacher Apprllel to schoappraisal s

nure in posto appraisa

t education

g quality mnce is well dults then genndled and c

management ek Cosier ampion of leadea of achieveand adminisective objecon of Educa

Teacher Evaacher evaluaregime inst this historas introducendertake thater law (Lat implemen

ance and sution in schoudents and on in practional evaluaschool unit

ccording to Idevelop a c

ontrolling m016) ion of Schoo201314 schcame complation (Circu105-03-201ts own educraisal ol self-evalystem to be

sts of respoal by their advisors on

management documentednerates factcontinuousllevels that

amp Aplin 198er effectiveement towarstrative stafctively accoational Syst

luation in Gation was thpection becrical backgred Accordihe evaluatiow 1566 of

nted during tupport to teools were me

parents leaice In the ation focuss rather thaInstitute of Eculture of evmeans jeop

ols hool year anpulsory for ulars 3097314) states thational goal

uation a pre implemennsibility Arespective

n education

75

systems (Ld and analyss on the basly improvet in turn im88) eness based rds targets wff students ountable mtem in Gre

Greece he job of schcame assocround insping to the thon of the e1985) whicthe 1980s Seachers Sevet with fiercading eithe2000s the sing on than on indivEducationalvaluation ofpardising ra

nd followinr all types C105-03-

hat at the bels and plan

residential dnted from 20According to

line managnal matters

In

Lewis Goosed with a msis of whichd This fun

mprove edu

in transparwhich have b

school commetricate andeece A Sho

hool inspectciated with pection washen law (Leducationalch also incluSchool adviveral attemce oppositior to their foemphasis c

he evaluatiovidual teachl Policy the f them and aather than r

ng a two-yeof pre-prim2013 1900ginning of ehow to reac

decree (PD01415 linko this propogers on admso a teache

nternational R

odman amp Fmethodical h the procesnctional infucational pr

rent objectibeen set fro

mmunity incd broader acort Retrospe

tors and parpolitical coabolished

1304 of 198l system buded referesors concenpts in the

on by teacheormal invalchanged to on of educhers (Verdis

context remassessment einforcing

ar pilot promary prima89C110-1each schoolch them (OE

D 1522013ked to teachosal educatministrativeerrsquos appraisa

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Fandt 1995)way and co

sses in quesformation srocess perfo

ive qualitaom all stake corporating ccepted modection and

rticularly duontrol In th and the sy82) school but this waences to eduntrated on pr1990s to in

ersrsquo unions lidation or more parti

cational wos 2002) in mained one i

as it was ofschool and

oject annuaary and se2-2013 Mil year everyECD 2017

3) introducehersrsquo promotion staff w

e matters aal would be

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

) When ompared stion can supports ormance

tive and holders parents

del Critical

uring the he early ystem of advisors

as never ucational roviding ntroduce teachers to their

icipative ork and (OECD in which ften seen d teacher

al school econdary inisterial y school p 56)

ed a new tion and

would be and their e carried

out by tthe direform ofoppositreductioprocessevaluati56) Over threformsoften famajor gobjectivreliableeffectivmeasurilearningnationaOECD In Greesystemshave thStrengthRecentllow in Gschool school accountof respoand deeducatiocooperaconfirmmainly To thisadminisinvited 234 EdAt this leadershlegislatievaluatiincludin

the school hector of eduf the appraision by manons due to ts of school sion process

he past years in educatioailed to makglobal resulves are conce indicatorsveness of Ging the qualg outcomes l assessmen 2017 p 9

ece accordis in Europehe least auhening scholy there havGreece eduleaders in Gself-evalua

tability (OEonsibility asevelopment onal leaderation with

med also by a recipient

s point it istration is sto lead (Muducational Lpoint howehip in Greeion Accordion of the ng the exe

head and reucation and sal report weny teachers athe crisis) Tself-evaluaties includin

rs Greek goon effectiveke a real imlts as far ascerned News are in plGreek educality and effeas there are

nts nor exte 53) ng to OECD

e which funuthority comool leadersh

ve been moducational ouGreece curration shoul

ECD 2017 s key to inc

of teacher itself 3) other schoo Papanaoumand executois worth m

sometimes nulford 2003Leadership ever it is aece is definding to the Pdirectors oercise of a

levant schothe relevanere defined and by teachThe teacherion previou

ng school se

overnmentseness Howe

mpact on thes the perforw laws havlace to proation systemectiveness oe neither external evalua

D (2011 pctions ineffmpared to hip is one odest moves utcomes remrently haveld be reinp 7) The a

creasing theer quality

strategic mols The abm (1995) wor of circulamentioning not due to i3) Evaluation

appropriate tned throughPresidential of school unadministrativ

76

ool advisor rnt educationcentrally Thersrsquo unionrsrsquo unions thusly perceivlf-evaluatio

s have sougever wheree quality andrmance of sve often beeovide inform The sysof the educaternal assesations of sc

p 24) we hafectively Oother coun

of the mosttowards de

main weak e limited resntroduced agencys OE

e effectivene2) objecti

managemenbove claim which statesars and orde

that to a its leaders

to mentionh the perspeDecree (PD

nits is carrve and org

In

respectivelyn advisor ThThis teacher ns (in the cohen reacted

ved in position were lsquofro

ght to addree reforms had efficiencystudents anden enacted brmation onstem cannoation systemssments of lechools and t

ave one of tOne of the antries is in t crucial chacentralizatioand the syssponsibilitietogether w

ECD (2011)ess of the Dives evalunt of financ

on the ces that the ders for all th

large extebut to the v

how the efective by thD 1522013ied out in ganisational

nternational R

y and that ohe criteria appraisal syntext of edu

d against theve terms Aozenrsquo in 201

ss a numbeave been inty of the systd the achievbut not fullyn the qualit rely on c

m and the actearning basteaching (O

the most cereas in whimanaging

allenges foron but whistem is still es and there

with some ) research id

Director 1) ation and cial and huntralized edirector at the main issue

ent the defvery system

ffectivenesshe framewo3 FEK Α 2five categol work wit

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of a school proceduresystem was mucation expe newly est

All these edu15 (OECD

er of issues troduced thtem and to vement of y implemenity efficienconsistent ttual achievesed on stand

OECD 2011

entralized edich school d

human rer education ile dropout r

highly cenre is consen

form of dentified fosupport evaccountabi

uman resouducation syhe Greek Ses of responficiency in

m in which

s of the eduork of the

24005-11-2ories of parthin the leg

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

head by and the met with enditure ablished

ucational 2017 p

through hey have produce learning nted No ncy and ools for ement of dardized 1 p 14

ducation directors esources

reform rates are

ntralized nsus that external

our areas valuation ility for urces 4) ystem is chool is

nsibility n school they are

ucational relevant 013) the rameters gislative

framewclimate conductAccordprocessits objecperformstandardeffectivfor eachof the sregionaevaluatiand stuintegratevaluatisystem 24 ConSo far iidentifieparametdetermito take that it aand thoeducatioresponsas well defines educatioIn summdirectorthe relework Tand in tof climachievinschool effectivproceduother wshould characte

work the exeand pedag

ting teachiing to Saϊti

s of evaluatinctives and t

mance standds and d) co

veness OECh region to ischool netwal director foion and assudent assesting studention school of assessme

nsiderationsit is understed with sufters and cerining the criinto accoun

affects in ororough as ponal leaderssibilities as as from theclear criter

onal adminimary we crs of school evant legislaThe effectivethe level of

mate and atting the objecleaders and

veness of higures as well

words whenconsider theristics of th

ercise of thegogy of theing and ev (2008 p ng the qualitargets and tdards (b) morrecting de

CD (2011 pimprove the

work to estaor making ssessment frassment balt formative aself evaluatent and evas About Dratood that thefficient objertainly not aiteria for thnt as far as rder procespossible Alship we musthey raised e Greek mairia of effectiistration and

can observeunits has b

ation makeseness also hdevelopmenitudes It isctives that ad their leadgh-level eduas common

n we refer tohis as a dyhe personal

e work of sue school unvaluating s15) the eva

ity of the edthe process

measuring peviations Am 43) recom

e efficiency ablish perfostep-by-stepamework stlancing extassessment tion with a vluation base

awing the Ase effectivenectively to a

a concept whe effectivenpossible obs off assesslso in the st take into afrom both tinly legislativeness whid less as crithat the ev

een done bos it clear thhas to do wint of the hums understoore come witdership stylucation pren acceptableo the concepynamic comity of the le

77

upervision annit planningstudents scaluation of

ducation proof such con

performancemong other

mmended toof the use o

ormance agp progress totudent asseternal and in the evalu

view to desied on resultssessment o

ness of educa large extehich is non-ness of the ebjective andsing leadersh

criticism waccount boththe various tion governich are set miteria evaluavaluation anoth at adminhat the direcith meeting

uman resourd from the th appropriale which isesuppose thee criteria forpt of effectmplex funceader and hi

In

nd evaluatiog organizecientific anthe educativided and thntrol consise (c) compar measures i Greece wa

of human regreements boward agreessment by ateacher-bas

uation and aigning and its and outcoof Educationcational leadent compar-measurableeducationald measurablhip to be as

we can exerh the admindefinitions

ning the opemore as objeation nd assessmenistrative anctor provideobjectives bces of educabove that

ate behavious exercisede existencer assessing thtive educatioction basedis team cult

nternational R

on the evalu and prepa

nd professioonal projecthe degree ofts of four staring the mn order to e

as to set goaesources andetween the ed goals imaligning edused assessmassessment mplementin

omes nal Leadersdership is a rative and me theoretica

administrale criteria os meritocratrt on the e

nistrative sidwe have seration of edectives and

ent of the end teaching es administrboth at the aational unitt effectivenurs particul Maintaininof commonhe quality aonal leaders

d on foundature and ma

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

uation of tharation of teonal devel

ct is the conf implementages a) Se

measuremenenhance eduals and bencd the rationa Ministry a

mplementatiducational stments of lframeworkng a compre

ship Effectivconcept tha

multiple crital and subjeation it is neof all the adtic fair meeffectivenesde off the leaet for the leaducational ucompetence

effectiveneslevel provi

trative and tadministratits and the foness is the rlar characterng the qua

nly acceptedand effectiveship evaluaations suchaturity of th

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

he school eaching lopment ntinuous tation of tting the

nt to the ucational chmarks alization and each on of an tandards learning teacher ehensive

veness at can be teria and ctive In ecessary dressees asurable s of the adership adership

units and es of the

ss of the ided that teaching ive level ormation result of ristics of

ality and d control eness In

ation we h as the

he group

with a sa constr3 Meth31 A SuAssessistakehoaffects into accother pafollowsbe holisand recspecificconcernthe recithereforeach of be muchwill incand shomulti-shoutside multitudThe evadirectioobjectivMore spexamplcriteria performsuch as of rightA seconthe genperformwith thsynergistrengthsuitablewith otprofessi

set specific ructive objehodology uggestion foing the effecolders Whe

then the procount all thearties and ths that a modstic and muipients that

c quantitativning the respipients of thre be differe

f them accorh more effe

clude the criortcomings hareholding

of the edude and divealuation of

on of a sve-directionpecifically e students of the pe

mance of pupanalytical

t attitudes annd goal in a

neral schoolmance or effhe local comes with othehening of re school climther interesional bodies

targets and ectively and

for a Holisticctiveness ofn the evaluocess is incoe addresseeshe respectiv

del of evaluaultifaceted it the educatve and qualipective recihe educatioent as well rding to the rective objecisis concurrof leadersh

g assessmenucational e

ersity of the effectivenepecific obj

n a first goastudent com

erformance pils in the vasynthetic cnd the shapianother direl communityfectiveness ommunity aner schools crelations anmate engagsted schools organizat

the objectivd defined pr

c Educationf educationaation relies omplete uns and does nve objectiveation of the ie to includional leaderitative criteripient and b

onal leadersas the criterespective octive meritently of ma

hip on focunt At the sanvironmentparties and

ess in educajective and

al in a specmmunity In

or effectivarious courscritical thinking of a cultction of eduy In this dof the educand the insticreation of

nd cooperatgement in exs or grouptions

78

ves pursuedrocess

nal Leadersal leadership

only to onenambiguousnot consideres and targeteducationalde to the furship influeria for the ebring about ship are maeria of effecobjectives thtocratic muany differenused issues ame time itt possible i

d evaluation ational leadd subseque

cific directin this directiveness of ses and finaking and abture ucational le

direction theational leadeitutions thea climate of

tion with thxtracurricul

ps such as

In

d respectivel

ship Evaluatp is a procese aspect wh

s and contror the implicts set by thel leadership

ullest extentences and frffectivenesssignificant

any and diffctiveness of hat will putulti-faceted int sides will

and will lim will operatinterventionmembers w

dership is a ent to the

ion of educion the indivthe educati

al exams theility knowl

adership cae individualership can be associatiof cooperatiohe parents lar activitiesthe structu

nternational R

ly in a give

tion Model ss that involhich the eduversial becaations effecem In the li to be fair apossible a

rom each ins of the eduresults to e

ferent fromf the educati Such an evintegrated al highlight smit biased cte in a restrn effort duwhich are ac

function ofe individua

cational leadvidual objecional leadee developmeledge acquis

an be for exl objectivesbe the develon of parenton the visioof pupils ts the netwoures of the

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

en time peri

lves many d

ucational leaause it does cts of leadeight of the aand effectivall interestednterested siducational leaeach of them

m each otherional leader

valuation moand functionspecific weacriticism durictive formue preciselyctively invof the generaal criteria

dership canctives and thership may ent of specifsition deve

xample pars and criterilopment of r

nts networkon of the schthe formati

orking of th local com

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

od with

different adership not take

ership on above it e should d parties de to set adership m Since r it will rship for odel will nal as it aknesses ue to its

m in any y to the

olved al initial of this

n be for herefore

be the fic skills

elopment

ents and ia of the relations king and hool the ion of a e school

mmunity

A third and admindividuleadershattitudeadminisleadershefficienparticipattainmA fourthcurrentindividuleadershapplicatthis theplanninthe limi4 DesigThe prothe effIndicatothis resAdminiadvancidevelopconstrumeaninThis wosupportthey leaand opethe jobthe mosThe evaweightiholistic educatiocommucommuwith intof onlyevaluati

goal in anoministrative ual objectivhip can be

es and behastrative pership is exer

ncy the reipation of th

ment of the ph goal in an regulated ual objectivhip can betion of the ee fulfilment ng organisaitation and egning the Eoposed modfectiveness ors amp Standspectively istration (20ing school p and supporct approprigful work oork requiretsmdashthe profarn and worerations of th educationast productivaluation moiness factorsmodel of e

onal community ie stunity ie parternal or exty a few coion of scho

ther directiocommunity

ves and crithe developaviours thsonnel are sarcised the inforcementhem in takpedagogical nother direceducation

ves and crie the unhinexisting eduof the organ

ation coordielimination Evaluation del should in

of the edudards) depen

Besides a015) whichleadership

rt teachers iate organizoutside of ths education

fessional caprk family anhe school T

al leaders neve and benefdel can alsos in each indvaluation o

munity ie tudents or rents assocternal evalu

ountries in ools and tea

on of educay ie teacheiteria of thpment of teeir empowatisfied by tstrengtheni

t of teamwking decisio

and operatiction of edupolicy of t

iteria of thndered funcucational legnisational aination and of any formModel of Enclude clearucational l

nding on theaccording th is a cons educationcreate positzational pol

he classroomnal leaders tpacity of teand communThus given teed new stanficial to studo be flexibledividual dirf educationateachers anpupils depiation of pa

uators BesidEurope wi

aching or in

79

ational leadeers and admhe performaachers skil

werment thetheir work ting of thei

work and coons accordiional goals

ucational leathe Ministr

he performactional orggislation wi

and other objd operation om of delinquEducationar objectivesleadership e particular to USA Nsortium of nal leaders tive workinglicies and

m that has a pto build anachers and snity engagemthis growingndards to gudents e and adjustrection or gral leadershind or profending on

arents and tdes accordiithout externdeed any

In

ership can bministrative pance or efflls the creae extent tothe degree or knowledgooperation ing to the respectively

adership canry and the ance or effanizational ith the minijectives setof the schoouency al Leadershs and corres(EKPIS Eeducational

National Poprofessionaduties and

g conditionssystems anpowerful imd strengthestaff the proment and eg knowledguide their pr

table enabliroup of criteip will be abfessors adm

the educatthe structuring to OECrnal assessmother comp

nternational R

e for examppersonnel Ifectiveness tion and cu

o which boof satisfactioge the impbetween thleadership

y n be the impcountry In

fectiveness structure o

mum possib the observol within th

hip Effectivponding cri

Educational l level and tholicy Boardal organizatd actions ins effectivelynd engage

mpact on whn a networkofessional cffective effe and the ch

ractice in dir

ing it to regueria Accordble to includministrative tional levele of the MiD (2011 pment of le

parative me

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

mple the eduIn this direcof the edu

ultivation ofoth academon from theprovement hem the in

style appl

plementation this direcof the eduof the schble deviatio

vance of prohe financial

veness iteria for ev

Key Perfohe specific nd for Edutions commnvolve reley allocate rein other d

hat happens rk of organicommunity ificient manahanging demrections tha

gulate and foding to the de as evalua staff the l the localinistry of Ed 14) Greecearning or echanism of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ucational tion the

ucational f correct

mics and way the of their

ncreased lied the

on of the ction the ucational ool the

ons from cedures budget

valuating ormance needs of

ucational mitted to entlessly esources eep and inside it

izational in which agement

mands of at will be

ormulate above a

ators the student

l school ducation ce is one external

f quality

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

particulsituationfaces a historicevaluatiand disdevelopissue ofeducatiomeasuraand its accountleadersh13 EduMany tiwhat arwhen aeffectivpossiblethese cathese in2 ReseThe genleadershquantitatry to prelevantResearcleadershand leadResearcobjectivResearcquantita21 InteAccordconstaneducatioon themhas becleadersfurther

lar with regan in such anmajor chal

cally been dion culture tstribution op reflectionf evaluatingonal managable concreevaluation it the overallhip defininucational Leimes there are those critea leader is veness of ee in order an be set fondividual criearch Questneral researhip is a resuative criteriaprovide a rt literature rch question hip Can thdership ch question ve and clearch questionative manneerest in Educing to Leith

ntly growinonal proces

m is sought ome deman The contininvolvemen

ard to the obn important llenge in dedistrusted that takes ref responsib draw conc

g the effectivgement andte criteria Mis studied thl educationa

ng specific eeadership Efare a varietyeria which d

effective ducational to realize w

or assessing iteria tions rch hypotheult which coa and indicaesponse thrreview 1 Who are

hey be credib

2 Could tr criteria andn 3 Can ther and evalucational Lehwood and

ng In theirss are systemAlso anoth

nding there nuous flow nt with it an

bjectivity ofissue is flui

eveloping aparticularly

esults as the bility (OECclusions andveness of edd leadershipMore specifhrough the dal environmefficacy criteEffectivenessy of questiondetermine leor not Thleadership

whether in ethe effectiv

esis in this sould be meaators Thererough the p

the most apble judges o

the outcomed which arehese criteriuated objectadership anRiehl (200view this

matically inher reason foare constanof the resu

d its results

72

f the assessmid and often

a culture ofy by the te first criterio

CD 2011 pd finally foducational lp correlatinfically the edesign of a

ment in all itseria accordis A Term Wns about leaeadership ashis study awith as cl

education cveness of ed

study is whasurable ade are three mprovision o

ppropriate raof the effec

es of the ede these ia be creditively nd Its Impor03) interests is becausnvestigatedor the intensntly changesults of varios On the oth

In

ment methon changeablf evaluationeaching proon or the bap 45) Thisormulate coeadership Ang the effeeffectivenesstandard ev

s dimensioning to those

With Several adership fors effective attempts toearly and a

can be estabducational l

hether the efdequately demain researf informati

aters of the tiveness of

ducational l

ible identif

rtance t in the fielse on the on the othe

se interest ins resulting ious researchher hand th

nternational R

ods and the ce Accordin

n as externaofession Oasis for imprs research ncrete propAim of this ectiveness oss of the eduvaluation mns and all poe recipients

Meanings r example ifor in a more

describe adequately blished objeleadership a

ffectivenessefined by relch questionon that wil

educationalthe educati

leadership b

fied set w

ld of educatone hand er hand then the field ofin new challhes on leadeis results in

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

criteria and ng to OECDal evaluatio

Overall therprovement st

was carriedposals on thwork is to fof leadershucational lea

model that taotential recip

f this is effee simplifiedand delinedefined cri

ective criterand which c

s of the edulative quali

ns on whichll emerge f

l administraional admin

be measurab

with qualitat

ational leadethe results

e leadersrsquo inf education lenges emer

dership reignn increased c

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

thus the D Greece ons have re is no trategies d out to he major focus on hip with adership akes into pients of

ective or d version eate the iteria as ria how could be

ucational tative or

h we will from the

ation and nistration

ble with

tive and

ership is s of the nfluence is that it

rging for nites the criticism

of schooexecutivsuccessthey doadminisevaluateSchool key rolteachersto imprleadershone of tof the m(Cohenthat a prsatisfachas veryinfluencworkingthat pri(Halling2008) Tthe schosmooth involveparentsthe listi22 EvaCriteriaThe pheof achieeducatiothereforto all oschool cfor all undergoimproveand perwhich mhead mOn the behave

ol educatioves Accor

sfully to the o not adequstrative strued-accountaleadership h

le in impros as well asrove the effhip is considthe success most influe McCabe rincipalrsquos le

ction and effy high impace the motivg environmincipal leadger amp HeckThe role of tool unit theoperation

ed or are r depend to ng of the re

aluation of Ea of Effectivenomenon oeving the reonal leadersre its effectof them Focommunityof them A

one which ement evalrformancerdquomakes senseay identify other sideat home a

onal leaders ding to theguidance of

uately explouctures do nable to a shas become

oving schoos the school ficiency anddered very ifactors of th

ential factorMichelli amp

eadership styficacy to levact on the imvation and p

ment (Pont Ndership cank 1996 Mathe leader ine creation of

constitute recipients oa large exte

elevant bibliEducationaveness of leadershiesults whichship in an etiveness muor example educationaA number frequently luation mo All these te to be connschools eff parentsrsquo cand their p

and findinge school lef their suboroit new technot provide atisfactory

e a priority iol outcomesclimate andd equity ofimportant fohe schools (rs in the deamp Pickeral yle and skillvels of engamprovemenperformancNusche amp M

have indirarzano Wan education f a vision inan importanf any form ent on the diography l Leadership

p and its efh in turn reladucational o

ust be studie pupils or al policy ouof terms anamong othenitoring reterms makenected with fectiveness could underperformance

73

gs which foceadership crdinates in thnologies othe requiredextent acco

in educations by influed environmef schooling for the prom(Edmonds

evelopment 2009) Mucls impact a agement andnt of the resce of teacherMoorman 2rect but a aters amp Mcis importan

n this humant mission

m of educatidecisions of

ip Is a Matt

ffects are ineate to a set oorganizationed in the ligstudents te

utcomes andnd concepter include ldquo

eviewing ske the concepeffort and aas the pupirstand schoe at nation

In

cus mainly oriticism sc

terms of impof it do notd services toording to tn policy ageencing the ment Effectiv

(OECD 2motion of the

1979) Schoof the qua

ch of the pvariety of ted academic sults of the rs by creatin

2008) Moresignificant

cNulty 200nt and the acan potential

In additionional leaderthe educati

ter of Relat

evitably intof criteria ann undoubtedght of the peachers admd the role ofts regardingldquocompetentkilled appropt of effectaccomplishmls performa

ools effectinal examina

nternational R

on the deficchool leadeproving theit revise-chao all studentthe standardendas internmotivations

ve school lea008) The r

e objectives ool leader ility and chrevious reseeacher charaemphasis (Bschool havng the appreover resea

impact on5 Robinsonchievement and the furt

n the differrship such aonal leader

tive but Con

erconnectednd parametedly has mulositive andministrativef educationag education accountabopriatenessiveness a vments For ance in the veness in tations Soc

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

ciency of eders do not ir teaching pange their o

nts while finds (Elmorenationally Its and capacadership is erole of edu of educatio

is considereharacter of aearch demoacteristics fBird et al 2

ving the potropriate climarch has detn student ouon Lloyd ampt of the objecther planninrent groups as teachersas we can s

ncurrently D

d with the ners The exeltiple recipi

dor negativee staff the al leader arenal effectivbility devel efficiency

very broad mexample thfinal examithe way thciety possib

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ducation respond

practices outdated nally not 2002) t plays a cities of essential ucational on and is d as one a school onstrates from job 2009) It tential to mate and termined utcomes

amp Rows ctives of ng for its

that are pupils see from

Different

necessity ercise of ents and e effects broader

e crucial eness is lopment

y quality meaning e school inations e pupils bly will

observeCommomarkersspecificstaff byteachersmaximuparentaproductnever pand sucMany omissionStrongeeducatioin relatiGrigsbyespeciaMapp 22015 PAlso othschool u(Catanoexperienof strateperceptsmooth materiacollaborthrough(1999) learningmutual confideof the influencinformaEducatiof systethroughperformmemberinforma

e the schoolonwealth Ses of interncally describy the heads structuredum communl and comtive divisionpossible for ccessful (Drof the internn and achieve 2006) Thonal schooion to many y Peters 20lly in relati2002 Leith

Portin et alher researchunit (Macbeo amp Strongnce in matteegies and mion of scho

operation al-Guide to eration inter

hout the eduan effectiveg opportunirespect set

ence createsschool hasce the memation collabional leaderems that enshout a set ofmance evalurs of work fation to info

ls effectiveecretariat (1nal performbes the indi the involvd lessons inication betmmunity inn of laboura school w

rucker 2012ationally ac

vement of ghe role of ll and the endifferent pa

015) creatinion to studehwood 200 2009) and hers looked eath 2001)ge 2006) ers of admin

methods and ool as a livi

as well aeducationalrest that conucational ce director mities It hasts goals ands positive ps the ability

mbers of theborate with rship and msure the impf integrated puation can onfit into the worm educati

eness in term1993) in its mance worcators of Sc

vement of tntellectuallytween teachnvolvementr among teawhich does 2) ccepted charoals are theleadership intire educatiarameters sng a sense ent outcom2 Leithwoteachers exat the effec the correlaThe effec

nistration anexpertise inng organism

as to the p act c) to juntribute to tommunity

motivates stus a stable ad conducts pleasant andy to guide school com

pupils paremanagement plementatiopractices innly be optimwhole organonal policy

74

ms of the g report descrking extechool Effecthe heads oy challengi

hers and pupt positive achers and not meet th

racteristics oe product ofin educatioion systemsuch as the sof commun

mes for exaood et al 20xpectations ctiveness ofation betwective directnd educationn economicm where thperception ustice undethe developm(Stravakou

udents and eadministrativ

them has d creative cstudents an

mmunity anents teachinprocesses

on of educatn order to acmised throunization sys

y and strateg

In

good moral cribes the sernal concectiveness asof departmeng teaching

pils efficienclimate c

good parenhe expectati

of school eff an effectivn is of cata and its effe

school climanity in schoample pupil004 OECDfrom the sch

f leadership een evaluatitor possessn and skills cs constructe human faof the ana

erstanding lment of stro 2003) Aseducators anve path crflexibility limate rationd enforce

nd to lead thng staff andinvolve the

tional policihieve speci

ugh a clear ustem It lookgy and invol

nternational R

mannersrsquo ochool effec

erns and s ldquoPurposefuent the invg work-cennt and accurconsistency

ntal reportrdquoions of soc

fficiency sucve school leaalytic imporectiveness hate (Cliffordol (Beck amps achievem

D 2013 Allehool leader through sel

ion and perfes profounconsisting otion and othactor is the alytical proleniency apong interpers they say nd promoteedibility crand takes ionally mana

disciplinehem to posiother bodie

e arrangemeies strategiefic educatiounderstandinks at how mlves the app

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of the childrctiveness asstaff outputful leadershivolvement ntered envirrate record ky among t Nevertheleciety to be e

uch as sharedadership (C

ortance for bhas been resd et al 2012

amp Foster 19ment (Henden Grigsby(Thompson

lf-assessmenformance stnd knowledof a) the poher matters bkey to bala

ogram as appreciation rsonal relatEverard amp

es the offer reates a cliinitiatives Iages the eco has the abitive resultses ent and depes and actio

onal targetsng of how d

managementplication of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ren The general t More ip of the of other ronment keeping teachers ess it is effective

d vision Catano amp both the searched 2 Allen 999) and erson amp

y Peters n 2017) nt of the tandards dge and ssession b) in the

ance and a single respect

ionships Morris

of equal imate of It shows onomics bility to

s collect

loyment on plans Process different t gathers systems

standardprocesswith debe effedecisionfurther Hence quantitasuch as could b23 ThePoints 231 ScUntil th1967-741980s school awere mimplemevaluatipedagogeducatioand evenon-impforms self-eva2017 pit was vas puniautonom232 SeStartingself-evaschoolsDecisiois requi233 TeIn paralteacher their tensubject relevant

ds coverings performanesirable resuectively hanns at all m(Schoderbean evaluati

ative criteriaacademic ae more effee Evaluatio

chool and The 1980s tea4 military rand againstadvisors wa

meant to unmented A la

ion was nogical guidaonal evaluaen some stuplementatioof educatioaluation of 56) But ac

very hard to itive and comy (IEP 20elf-Evaluatig from the 2aluation becs The legislon 30972Γ1red to set iteacher Apprllel to schoappraisal s

nure in posto appraisa

t education

g quality mnce is well dults then genndled and c

management ek Cosier ampion of leadea of achieveand adminisective objecon of Educa

Teacher Evaacher evaluaregime inst this historas introducendertake thater law (Lat implemen

ance and sution in schoudents and on in practional evaluaschool unit

ccording to Idevelop a c

ontrolling m016) ion of Schoo201314 schcame complation (Circu105-03-201ts own educraisal ol self-evalystem to be

sts of respoal by their advisors on

management documentednerates factcontinuousllevels that

amp Aplin 198er effectiveement towarstrative stafctively accoational Syst

luation in Gation was thpection becrical backgred Accordihe evaluatiow 1566 of

nted during tupport to teools were me

parents leaice In the ation focuss rather thaInstitute of Eculture of evmeans jeop

ols hool year anpulsory for ulars 3097314) states thational goal

uation a pre implemennsibility Arespective

n education

75

systems (Ld and analyss on the basly improvet in turn im88) eness based rds targets wff students ountable mtem in Gre

Greece he job of schcame assocround insping to the thon of the e1985) whicthe 1980s Seachers Sevet with fiercading eithe2000s the sing on than on indivEducationalvaluation ofpardising ra

nd followinr all types C105-03-

hat at the bels and plan

residential dnted from 20According to

line managnal matters

In

Lewis Goosed with a msis of whichd This fun

mprove edu

in transparwhich have b

school commetricate andeece A Sho

hool inspectciated with pection washen law (Leducationalch also incluSchool adviveral attemce oppositior to their foemphasis c

he evaluatiovidual teachl Policy the f them and aather than r

ng a two-yeof pre-prim2013 1900ginning of ehow to reac

decree (PD01415 linko this propogers on admso a teache

nternational R

odman amp Fmethodical h the procesnctional infucational pr

rent objectibeen set fro

mmunity incd broader acort Retrospe

tors and parpolitical coabolished

1304 of 198l system buded referesors concenpts in the

on by teacheormal invalchanged to on of educhers (Verdis

context remassessment einforcing

ar pilot promary prima89C110-1each schoolch them (OE

D 1522013ked to teachosal educatministrativeerrsquos appraisa

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Fandt 1995)way and co

sses in quesformation srocess perfo

ive qualitaom all stake corporating ccepted modection and

rticularly duontrol In th and the sy82) school but this waences to eduntrated on pr1990s to in

ersrsquo unions lidation or more parti

cational wos 2002) in mained one i

as it was ofschool and

oject annuaary and se2-2013 Mil year everyECD 2017

3) introducehersrsquo promotion staff w

e matters aal would be

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

) When ompared stion can supports ormance

tive and holders parents

del Critical

uring the he early ystem of advisors

as never ucational roviding ntroduce teachers to their

icipative ork and (OECD in which ften seen d teacher

al school econdary inisterial y school p 56)

ed a new tion and

would be and their e carried

out by tthe direform ofoppositreductioprocessevaluati56) Over threformsoften famajor gobjectivreliableeffectivmeasurilearningnationaOECD In Greesystemshave thStrengthRecentllow in Gschool school accountof respoand deeducatiocooperaconfirmmainly To thisadminisinvited 234 EdAt this leadershlegislatievaluatiincludin

the school hector of eduf the appraision by manons due to ts of school sion process

he past years in educatioailed to makglobal resulves are conce indicatorsveness of Ging the qualg outcomes l assessmen 2017 p 9

ece accordis in Europehe least auhening scholy there havGreece eduleaders in Gself-evalua

tability (OEonsibility asevelopment onal leaderation with

med also by a recipient

s point it istration is sto lead (Muducational Lpoint howehip in Greeion Accordion of the ng the exe

head and reucation and sal report weny teachers athe crisis) Tself-evaluaties includin

rs Greek goon effectiveke a real imlts as far ascerned News are in plGreek educality and effeas there are

nts nor exte 53) ng to OECD

e which funuthority comool leadersh

ve been moducational ouGreece curration shoul

ECD 2017 s key to inc

of teacher itself 3) other schoo Papanaoumand executois worth m

sometimes nulford 2003Leadership ever it is aece is definding to the Pdirectors oercise of a

levant schothe relevanere defined and by teachThe teacherion previou

ng school se

overnmentseness Howe

mpact on thes the perforw laws havlace to proation systemectiveness oe neither external evalua

D (2011 pctions ineffmpared to hip is one odest moves utcomes remrently haveld be reinp 7) The a

creasing theer quality

strategic mols The abm (1995) wor of circulamentioning not due to i3) Evaluation

appropriate tned throughPresidential of school unadministrativ

76

ool advisor rnt educationcentrally Thersrsquo unionrsrsquo unions thusly perceivlf-evaluatio

s have sougever wheree quality andrmance of sve often beeovide inform The sysof the educaternal assesations of sc

p 24) we hafectively Oother coun

of the mosttowards de

main weak e limited resntroduced agencys OE

e effectivene2) objecti

managemenbove claim which statesars and orde

that to a its leaders

to mentionh the perspeDecree (PD

nits is carrve and org

In

respectivelyn advisor ThThis teacher ns (in the cohen reacted

ved in position were lsquofro

ght to addree reforms had efficiencystudents anden enacted brmation onstem cannoation systemssments of lechools and t

ave one of tOne of the antries is in t crucial chacentralizatioand the syssponsibilitietogether w

ECD (2011)ess of the Dives evalunt of financ

on the ces that the ders for all th

large extebut to the v

how the efective by thD 1522013ied out in ganisational

nternational R

y and that ohe criteria appraisal syntext of edu

d against theve terms Aozenrsquo in 201

ss a numbeave been inty of the systd the achievbut not fullyn the qualit rely on c

m and the actearning basteaching (O

the most cereas in whimanaging

allenges foron but whistem is still es and there

with some ) research id

Director 1) ation and cial and huntralized edirector at the main issue

ent the defvery system

ffectivenesshe framewo3 FEK Α 2five categol work wit

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of a school proceduresystem was mucation expe newly est

All these edu15 (OECD

er of issues troduced thtem and to vement of y implemenity efficienconsistent ttual achievesed on stand

OECD 2011

entralized edich school d

human rer education ile dropout r

highly cenre is consen

form of dentified fosupport evaccountabi

uman resouducation syhe Greek Ses of responficiency in

m in which

s of the eduork of the

24005-11-2ories of parthin the leg

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

head by and the met with enditure ablished

ucational 2017 p

through hey have produce learning nted No ncy and ools for ement of dardized 1 p 14

ducation directors esources

reform rates are

ntralized nsus that external

our areas valuation ility for urces 4) ystem is chool is

nsibility n school they are

ucational relevant 013) the rameters gislative

framewclimate conductAccordprocessits objecperformstandardeffectivfor eachof the sregionaevaluatiand stuintegratevaluatisystem 24 ConSo far iidentifieparametdetermito take that it aand thoeducatioresponsas well defines educatioIn summdirectorthe relework Tand in tof climachievinschool effectivproceduother wshould characte

work the exeand pedag

ting teachiing to Saϊti

s of evaluatinctives and t

mance standds and d) co

veness OECh region to ischool netwal director foion and assudent assesting studention school of assessme

nsiderationsit is understed with sufters and cerining the criinto accoun

affects in ororough as ponal leaderssibilities as as from theclear criter

onal adminimary we crs of school evant legislaThe effectivethe level of

mate and atting the objecleaders and

veness of higures as well

words whenconsider theristics of th

ercise of thegogy of theing and ev (2008 p ng the qualitargets and tdards (b) morrecting de

CD (2011 pimprove the

work to estaor making ssessment frassment balt formative aself evaluatent and evas About Dratood that thefficient objertainly not aiteria for thnt as far as rder procespossible Alship we musthey raised e Greek mairia of effectiistration and

can observeunits has b

ation makeseness also hdevelopmenitudes It isctives that ad their leadgh-level eduas common

n we refer tohis as a dyhe personal

e work of sue school unvaluating s15) the eva

ity of the edthe process

measuring peviations Am 43) recom

e efficiency ablish perfostep-by-stepamework stlancing extassessment tion with a vluation base

awing the Ase effectivenectively to a

a concept whe effectivenpossible obs off assesslso in the st take into afrom both tinly legislativeness whid less as crithat the ev

een done bos it clear thhas to do wint of the hums understoore come witdership stylucation pren acceptableo the concepynamic comity of the le

77

upervision annit planningstudents scaluation of

ducation proof such con

performancemong other

mmended toof the use o

ormance agp progress totudent asseternal and in the evalu

view to desied on resultssessment o

ness of educa large extehich is non-ness of the ebjective andsing leadersh

criticism waccount boththe various tion governich are set miteria evaluavaluation anoth at adminhat the direcith meeting

uman resourd from the th appropriale which isesuppose thee criteria forpt of effectmplex funceader and hi

In

nd evaluatiog organizecientific anthe educativided and thntrol consise (c) compar measures i Greece wa

of human regreements boward agreessment by ateacher-bas

uation and aigning and its and outcoof Educationcational leadent compar-measurableeducationald measurablhip to be as

we can exerh the admindefinitions

ning the opemore as objeation nd assessmenistrative anctor provideobjectives bces of educabove that

ate behavious exercisede existencer assessing thtive educatioction basedis team cult

nternational R

on the evalu and prepa

nd professioonal projecthe degree ofts of four staring the mn order to e

as to set goaesources andetween the ed goals imaligning edused assessmassessment mplementin

omes nal Leadersdership is a rative and me theoretica

administrale criteria os meritocratrt on the e

nistrative sidwe have seration of edectives and

ent of the end teaching es administrboth at the aational unitt effectivenurs particul Maintaininof commonhe quality aonal leaders

d on foundature and ma

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

uation of tharation of teonal devel

ct is the conf implementages a) Se

measuremenenhance eduals and bencd the rationa Ministry a

mplementatiducational stments of lframeworkng a compre

ship Effectivconcept tha

multiple crital and subjeation it is neof all the adtic fair meeffectivenesde off the leaet for the leaducational ucompetence

effectiveneslevel provi

trative and tadministratits and the foness is the rlar characterng the qua

nly acceptedand effectiveship evaluaations suchaturity of th

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

he school eaching lopment ntinuous tation of tting the

nt to the ucational chmarks alization and each on of an tandards learning teacher ehensive

veness at can be teria and ctive In ecessary dressees asurable s of the adership adership

units and es of the

ss of the ided that teaching ive level ormation result of ristics of

ality and d control eness In

ation we h as the

he group

with a sa constr3 Meth31 A SuAssessistakehoaffects into accother pafollowsbe holisand recspecificconcernthe recithereforeach of be muchwill incand shomulti-shoutside multitudThe evadirectioobjectivMore spexamplcriteria performsuch as of rightA seconthe genperformwith thsynergistrengthsuitablewith otprofessi

set specific ructive objehodology uggestion foing the effecolders Whe

then the procount all thearties and ths that a modstic and muipients that

c quantitativning the respipients of thre be differe

f them accorh more effe

clude the criortcomings hareholding

of the edude and divealuation of

on of a sve-directionpecifically e students of the pe

mance of pupanalytical

t attitudes annd goal in a

neral schoolmance or effhe local comes with othehening of re school climther interesional bodies

targets and ectively and

for a Holisticctiveness ofn the evaluocess is incoe addresseeshe respectiv

del of evaluaultifaceted it the educatve and qualipective recihe educatioent as well rding to the rective objecisis concurrof leadersh

g assessmenucational e

ersity of the effectivenepecific obj

n a first goastudent com

erformance pils in the vasynthetic cnd the shapianother direl communityfectiveness ommunity aner schools crelations anmate engagsted schools organizat

the objectivd defined pr

c Educationf educationaation relies omplete uns and does nve objectiveation of the ie to includional leaderitative criteripient and b

onal leadersas the criterespective octive meritently of ma

hip on focunt At the sanvironmentparties and

ess in educajective and

al in a specmmunity In

or effectivarious courscritical thinking of a cultction of eduy In this dof the educand the insticreation of

nd cooperatgement in exs or grouptions

78

ves pursuedrocess

nal Leadersal leadership

only to onenambiguousnot consideres and targeteducationalde to the furship influeria for the ebring about ship are maeria of effecobjectives thtocratic muany differenused issues ame time itt possible i

d evaluation ational leadd subseque

cific directin this directiveness of ses and finaking and abture ucational le

direction theational leadeitutions thea climate of

tion with thxtracurricul

ps such as

In

d respectivel

ship Evaluatp is a procese aspect wh

s and contror the implicts set by thel leadership

ullest extentences and frffectivenesssignificant

any and diffctiveness of hat will putulti-faceted int sides will

and will lim will operatinterventionmembers w

dership is a ent to the

ion of educion the indivthe educati

al exams theility knowl

adership cae individualership can be associatiof cooperatiohe parents lar activitiesthe structu

nternational R

ly in a give

tion Model ss that involhich the eduversial becaations effecem In the li to be fair apossible a

rom each ins of the eduresults to e

ferent fromf the educati Such an evintegrated al highlight smit biased cte in a restrn effort duwhich are ac

function ofe individua

cational leadvidual objecional leadee developmeledge acquis

an be for exl objectivesbe the develon of parenton the visioof pupils ts the netwoures of the

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

en time peri

lves many d

ucational leaause it does cts of leadeight of the aand effectivall interestednterested siducational leaeach of them

m each otherional leader

valuation moand functionspecific weacriticism durictive formue preciselyctively invof the generaal criteria

dership canctives and thership may ent of specifsition deve

xample pars and criterilopment of r

nts networkon of the schthe formati

orking of th local com

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

od with

different adership not take

ership on above it e should d parties de to set adership m Since r it will rship for odel will nal as it aknesses ue to its

m in any y to the

olved al initial of this

n be for herefore

be the fic skills

elopment

ents and ia of the relations king and hool the ion of a e school

mmunity

A third and admindividuleadershattitudeadminisleadershefficienparticipattainmA fourthcurrentindividuleadershapplicatthis theplanninthe limi4 DesigThe prothe effIndicatothis resAdminiadvancidevelopconstrumeaninThis wosupportthey leaand opethe jobthe mosThe evaweightiholistic educatiocommucommuwith intof onlyevaluati

goal in anoministrative ual objectivhip can be

es and behastrative pership is exer

ncy the reipation of th

ment of the ph goal in an regulated ual objectivhip can betion of the ee fulfilment ng organisaitation and egning the Eoposed modfectiveness ors amp Standspectively istration (20ing school p and supporct approprigful work oork requiretsmdashthe profarn and worerations of th educationast productivaluation moiness factorsmodel of e

onal community ie stunity ie parternal or exty a few coion of scho

ther directiocommunity

ves and crithe developaviours thsonnel are sarcised the inforcementhem in takpedagogical nother direceducation

ves and crie the unhinexisting eduof the organ

ation coordielimination Evaluation del should in

of the edudards) depen

Besides a015) whichleadership

rt teachers iate organizoutside of ths education

fessional caprk family anhe school T

al leaders neve and benefdel can alsos in each indvaluation o

munity ie tudents or rents assocternal evalu

ountries in ools and tea

on of educay ie teacheiteria of thpment of teeir empowatisfied by tstrengtheni

t of teamwking decisio

and operatiction of edupolicy of t

iteria of thndered funcucational legnisational aination and of any formModel of Enclude clearucational l

nding on theaccording th is a cons educationcreate positzational pol

he classroomnal leaders tpacity of teand communThus given teed new stanficial to studo be flexibledividual dirf educationateachers anpupils depiation of pa

uators BesidEurope wi

aching or in

79

ational leadeers and admhe performaachers skil

werment thetheir work ting of thei

work and coons accordiional goals

ucational leathe Ministr

he performactional orggislation wi

and other objd operation om of delinquEducationar objectivesleadership e particular to USA Nsortium of nal leaders tive workinglicies and

m that has a pto build anachers and snity engagemthis growingndards to gudents e and adjustrection or gral leadershind or profending on

arents and tdes accordiithout externdeed any

In

ership can bministrative pance or efflls the creae extent tothe degree or knowledgooperation ing to the respectively

adership canry and the ance or effanizational ith the minijectives setof the schoouency al Leadershs and corres(EKPIS Eeducational

National Poprofessionaduties and

g conditionssystems anpowerful imd strengthestaff the proment and eg knowledguide their pr

table enabliroup of criteip will be abfessors adm

the educatthe structuring to OECrnal assessmother comp

nternational R

e for examppersonnel Ifectiveness tion and cu

o which boof satisfactioge the impbetween thleadership

y n be the impcountry In

fectiveness structure o

mum possib the observol within th

hip Effectivponding cri

Educational l level and tholicy Boardal organizatd actions ins effectivelynd engage

mpact on whn a networkofessional cffective effe and the ch

ractice in dir

ing it to regueria Accordble to includministrative tional levele of the MiD (2011 pment of le

parative me

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

mple the eduIn this direcof the edu

ultivation ofoth academon from theprovement hem the in

style appl

plementation this direcof the eduof the schble deviatio

vance of prohe financial

veness iteria for ev

Key Perfohe specific nd for Edutions commnvolve reley allocate rein other d

hat happens rk of organicommunity ificient manahanging demrections tha

gulate and foding to the de as evalua staff the l the localinistry of Ed 14) Greecearning or echanism of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ucational tion the

ucational f correct

mics and way the of their

ncreased lied the

on of the ction the ucational ool the

ons from cedures budget

valuating ormance needs of

ucational mitted to entlessly esources eep and inside it

izational in which agement

mands of at will be

ormulate above a

ators the student

l school ducation ce is one external

f quality

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

of schooexecutivsuccessthey doadminisevaluateSchool key rolteachersto imprleadershone of tof the m(Cohenthat a prsatisfachas veryinfluencworkingthat pri(Halling2008) Tthe schosmooth involveparentsthe listi22 EvaCriteriaThe pheof achieeducatiothereforto all oschool cfor all undergoimproveand perwhich mhead mOn the behave

ol educatioves Accor

sfully to the o not adequstrative strued-accountaleadership h

le in impros as well asrove the effhip is considthe success most influe McCabe rincipalrsquos le

ction and effy high impace the motivg environmincipal leadger amp HeckThe role of tool unit theoperation

ed or are r depend to ng of the re

aluation of Ea of Effectivenomenon oeving the reonal leadersre its effectof them Focommunityof them A

one which ement evalrformancerdquomakes senseay identify other sideat home a

onal leaders ding to theguidance of

uately explouctures do nable to a shas become

oving schoos the school ficiency anddered very ifactors of th

ential factorMichelli amp

eadership styficacy to levact on the imvation and p

ment (Pont Ndership cank 1996 Mathe leader ine creation of

constitute recipients oa large exte

elevant bibliEducationaveness of leadershiesults whichship in an etiveness muor example educationaA number frequently luation mo All these te to be connschools eff parentsrsquo cand their p

and findinge school lef their suboroit new technot provide atisfactory

e a priority iol outcomesclimate andd equity ofimportant fohe schools (rs in the deamp Pickeral yle and skillvels of engamprovemenperformancNusche amp M

have indirarzano Wan education f a vision inan importanf any form ent on the diography l Leadership

p and its efh in turn reladucational o

ust be studie pupils or al policy ouof terms anamong othenitoring reterms makenected with fectiveness could underperformance

73

gs which foceadership crdinates in thnologies othe requiredextent acco

in educations by influed environmef schooling for the prom(Edmonds

evelopment 2009) Mucls impact a agement andnt of the resce of teacherMoorman 2rect but a aters amp Mcis importan

n this humant mission

m of educatidecisions of

ip Is a Matt

ffects are ineate to a set oorganizationed in the ligstudents te

utcomes andnd concepter include ldquo

eviewing ske the concepeffort and aas the pupirstand schoe at nation

In

cus mainly oriticism sc

terms of impof it do notd services toording to tn policy ageencing the ment Effectiv

(OECD 2motion of the

1979) Schoof the qua

ch of the pvariety of ted academic sults of the rs by creatin

2008) Moresignificant

cNulty 200nt and the acan potential

In additionional leaderthe educati

ter of Relat

evitably intof criteria ann undoubtedght of the peachers admd the role ofts regardingldquocompetentkilled appropt of effectaccomplishmls performa

ools effectinal examina

nternational R

on the deficchool leadeproving theit revise-chao all studentthe standardendas internmotivations

ve school lea008) The r

e objectives ool leader ility and chrevious reseeacher charaemphasis (Bschool havng the appreover resea

impact on5 Robinsonchievement and the furt

n the differrship such aonal leader

tive but Con

erconnectednd parametedly has mulositive andministrativef educationag education accountabopriatenessiveness a vments For ance in the veness in tations Soc

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

ciency of eders do not ir teaching pange their o

nts while finds (Elmorenationally Its and capacadership is erole of edu of educatio

is considereharacter of aearch demoacteristics fBird et al 2

ving the potropriate climarch has detn student ouon Lloyd ampt of the objecther planninrent groups as teachersas we can s

ncurrently D

d with the ners The exeltiple recipi

dor negativee staff the al leader arenal effectivbility devel efficiency

very broad mexample thfinal examithe way thciety possib

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ducation respond

practices outdated nally not 2002) t plays a cities of essential ucational on and is d as one a school onstrates from job 2009) It tential to mate and termined utcomes

amp Rows ctives of ng for its

that are pupils see from

Different

necessity ercise of ents and e effects broader

e crucial eness is lopment

y quality meaning e school inations e pupils bly will

observeCommomarkersspecificstaff byteachersmaximuparentaproductnever pand sucMany omissionStrongeeducatioin relatiGrigsbyespeciaMapp 22015 PAlso othschool u(Catanoexperienof strateperceptsmooth materiacollaborthrough(1999) learningmutual confideof the influencinformaEducatiof systethroughperformmemberinforma

e the schoolonwealth Ses of interncally describy the heads structuredum communl and comtive divisionpossible for ccessful (Drof the internn and achieve 2006) Thonal schooion to many y Peters 20lly in relati2002 Leith

Portin et alher researchunit (Macbeo amp Strongnce in matteegies and mion of scho

operation al-Guide to eration inter

hout the eduan effectiveg opportunirespect set

ence createsschool hasce the memation collabional leaderems that enshout a set ofmance evalurs of work fation to info

ls effectiveecretariat (1nal performbes the indi the involvd lessons inication betmmunity inn of laboura school w

rucker 2012ationally ac

vement of ghe role of ll and the endifferent pa

015) creatinion to studehwood 200 2009) and hers looked eath 2001)ge 2006) ers of admin

methods and ool as a livi

as well aeducationalrest that conucational ce director mities It hasts goals ands positive ps the ability

mbers of theborate with rship and msure the impf integrated puation can onfit into the worm educati

eness in term1993) in its mance worcators of Sc

vement of tntellectuallytween teachnvolvementr among teawhich does 2) ccepted charoals are theleadership intire educatiarameters sng a sense ent outcom2 Leithwoteachers exat the effec the correlaThe effec

nistration anexpertise inng organism

as to the p act c) to juntribute to tommunity

motivates stus a stable ad conducts pleasant andy to guide school com

pupils paremanagement plementatiopractices innly be optimwhole organonal policy

74

ms of the g report descrking extechool Effecthe heads oy challengi

hers and pupt positive achers and not meet th

racteristics oe product ofin educatioion systemsuch as the sof commun

mes for exaood et al 20xpectations ctiveness ofation betwective directnd educationn economicm where thperception ustice undethe developm(Stravakou

udents and eadministrativ

them has d creative cstudents an

mmunity anents teachinprocesses

on of educatn order to acmised throunization sys

y and strateg

In

good moral cribes the sernal concectiveness asof departmeng teaching

pils efficienclimate c

good parenhe expectati

of school eff an effectivn is of cata and its effe

school climanity in schoample pupil004 OECDfrom the sch

f leadership een evaluatitor possessn and skills cs constructe human faof the ana

erstanding lment of stro 2003) Aseducators anve path crflexibility limate rationd enforce

nd to lead thng staff andinvolve the

tional policihieve speci

ugh a clear ustem It lookgy and invol

nternational R

mannersrsquo ochool effec

erns and s ldquoPurposefuent the invg work-cennt and accurconsistency

ntal reportrdquoions of soc

fficiency sucve school leaalytic imporectiveness hate (Cliffordol (Beck amps achievem

D 2013 Allehool leader through sel

ion and perfes profounconsisting otion and othactor is the alytical proleniency apong interpers they say nd promoteedibility crand takes ionally mana

disciplinehem to posiother bodie

e arrangemeies strategiefic educatiounderstandinks at how mlves the app

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of the childrctiveness asstaff outputful leadershivolvement ntered envirrate record ky among t Nevertheleciety to be e

uch as sharedadership (C

ortance for bhas been resd et al 2012

amp Foster 19ment (Henden Grigsby(Thompson

lf-assessmenformance stnd knowledof a) the poher matters bkey to bala

ogram as appreciation rsonal relatEverard amp

es the offer reates a cliinitiatives Iages the eco has the abitive resultses ent and depes and actio

onal targetsng of how d

managementplication of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ren The general t More ip of the of other ronment keeping teachers ess it is effective

d vision Catano amp both the searched 2 Allen 999) and erson amp

y Peters n 2017) nt of the tandards dge and ssession b) in the

ance and a single respect

ionships Morris

of equal imate of It shows onomics bility to

s collect

loyment on plans Process different t gathers systems

standardprocesswith debe effedecisionfurther Hence quantitasuch as could b23 ThePoints 231 ScUntil th1967-741980s school awere mimplemevaluatipedagogeducatioand evenon-impforms self-eva2017 pit was vas puniautonom232 SeStartingself-evaschoolsDecisiois requi233 TeIn paralteacher their tensubject relevant

ds coverings performanesirable resuectively hanns at all m(Schoderbean evaluati

ative criteriaacademic ae more effee Evaluatio

chool and The 1980s tea4 military rand againstadvisors wa

meant to unmented A la

ion was nogical guidaonal evaluaen some stuplementatioof educatioaluation of 56) But ac

very hard to itive and comy (IEP 20elf-Evaluatig from the 2aluation becs The legislon 30972Γ1red to set iteacher Apprllel to schoappraisal s

nure in posto appraisa

t education

g quality mnce is well dults then genndled and c

management ek Cosier ampion of leadea of achieveand adminisective objecon of Educa

Teacher Evaacher evaluaregime inst this historas introducendertake thater law (Lat implemen

ance and sution in schoudents and on in practional evaluaschool unit

ccording to Idevelop a c

ontrolling m016) ion of Schoo201314 schcame complation (Circu105-03-201ts own educraisal ol self-evalystem to be

sts of respoal by their advisors on

management documentednerates factcontinuousllevels that

amp Aplin 198er effectiveement towarstrative stafctively accoational Syst

luation in Gation was thpection becrical backgred Accordihe evaluatiow 1566 of

nted during tupport to teools were me

parents leaice In the ation focuss rather thaInstitute of Eculture of evmeans jeop

ols hool year anpulsory for ulars 3097314) states thational goal

uation a pre implemennsibility Arespective

n education

75

systems (Ld and analyss on the basly improvet in turn im88) eness based rds targets wff students ountable mtem in Gre

Greece he job of schcame assocround insping to the thon of the e1985) whicthe 1980s Seachers Sevet with fiercading eithe2000s the sing on than on indivEducationalvaluation ofpardising ra

nd followinr all types C105-03-

hat at the bels and plan

residential dnted from 20According to

line managnal matters

In

Lewis Goosed with a msis of whichd This fun

mprove edu

in transparwhich have b

school commetricate andeece A Sho

hool inspectciated with pection washen law (Leducationalch also incluSchool adviveral attemce oppositior to their foemphasis c

he evaluatiovidual teachl Policy the f them and aather than r

ng a two-yeof pre-prim2013 1900ginning of ehow to reac

decree (PD01415 linko this propogers on admso a teache

nternational R

odman amp Fmethodical h the procesnctional infucational pr

rent objectibeen set fro

mmunity incd broader acort Retrospe

tors and parpolitical coabolished

1304 of 198l system buded referesors concenpts in the

on by teacheormal invalchanged to on of educhers (Verdis

context remassessment einforcing

ar pilot promary prima89C110-1each schoolch them (OE

D 1522013ked to teachosal educatministrativeerrsquos appraisa

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Fandt 1995)way and co

sses in quesformation srocess perfo

ive qualitaom all stake corporating ccepted modection and

rticularly duontrol In th and the sy82) school but this waences to eduntrated on pr1990s to in

ersrsquo unions lidation or more parti

cational wos 2002) in mained one i

as it was ofschool and

oject annuaary and se2-2013 Mil year everyECD 2017

3) introducehersrsquo promotion staff w

e matters aal would be

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

) When ompared stion can supports ormance

tive and holders parents

del Critical

uring the he early ystem of advisors

as never ucational roviding ntroduce teachers to their

icipative ork and (OECD in which ften seen d teacher

al school econdary inisterial y school p 56)

ed a new tion and

would be and their e carried

out by tthe direform ofoppositreductioprocessevaluati56) Over threformsoften famajor gobjectivreliableeffectivmeasurilearningnationaOECD In Greesystemshave thStrengthRecentllow in Gschool school accountof respoand deeducatiocooperaconfirmmainly To thisadminisinvited 234 EdAt this leadershlegislatievaluatiincludin

the school hector of eduf the appraision by manons due to ts of school sion process

he past years in educatioailed to makglobal resulves are conce indicatorsveness of Ging the qualg outcomes l assessmen 2017 p 9

ece accordis in Europehe least auhening scholy there havGreece eduleaders in Gself-evalua

tability (OEonsibility asevelopment onal leaderation with

med also by a recipient

s point it istration is sto lead (Muducational Lpoint howehip in Greeion Accordion of the ng the exe

head and reucation and sal report weny teachers athe crisis) Tself-evaluaties includin

rs Greek goon effectiveke a real imlts as far ascerned News are in plGreek educality and effeas there are

nts nor exte 53) ng to OECD

e which funuthority comool leadersh

ve been moducational ouGreece curration shoul

ECD 2017 s key to inc

of teacher itself 3) other schoo Papanaoumand executois worth m

sometimes nulford 2003Leadership ever it is aece is definding to the Pdirectors oercise of a

levant schothe relevanere defined and by teachThe teacherion previou

ng school se

overnmentseness Howe

mpact on thes the perforw laws havlace to proation systemectiveness oe neither external evalua

D (2011 pctions ineffmpared to hip is one odest moves utcomes remrently haveld be reinp 7) The a

creasing theer quality

strategic mols The abm (1995) wor of circulamentioning not due to i3) Evaluation

appropriate tned throughPresidential of school unadministrativ

76

ool advisor rnt educationcentrally Thersrsquo unionrsrsquo unions thusly perceivlf-evaluatio

s have sougever wheree quality andrmance of sve often beeovide inform The sysof the educaternal assesations of sc

p 24) we hafectively Oother coun

of the mosttowards de

main weak e limited resntroduced agencys OE

e effectivene2) objecti

managemenbove claim which statesars and orde

that to a its leaders

to mentionh the perspeDecree (PD

nits is carrve and org

In

respectivelyn advisor ThThis teacher ns (in the cohen reacted

ved in position were lsquofro

ght to addree reforms had efficiencystudents anden enacted brmation onstem cannoation systemssments of lechools and t

ave one of tOne of the antries is in t crucial chacentralizatioand the syssponsibilitietogether w

ECD (2011)ess of the Dives evalunt of financ

on the ces that the ders for all th

large extebut to the v

how the efective by thD 1522013ied out in ganisational

nternational R

y and that ohe criteria appraisal syntext of edu

d against theve terms Aozenrsquo in 201

ss a numbeave been inty of the systd the achievbut not fullyn the qualit rely on c

m and the actearning basteaching (O

the most cereas in whimanaging

allenges foron but whistem is still es and there

with some ) research id

Director 1) ation and cial and huntralized edirector at the main issue

ent the defvery system

ffectivenesshe framewo3 FEK Α 2five categol work wit

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of a school proceduresystem was mucation expe newly est

All these edu15 (OECD

er of issues troduced thtem and to vement of y implemenity efficienconsistent ttual achievesed on stand

OECD 2011

entralized edich school d

human rer education ile dropout r

highly cenre is consen

form of dentified fosupport evaccountabi

uman resouducation syhe Greek Ses of responficiency in

m in which

s of the eduork of the

24005-11-2ories of parthin the leg

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

head by and the met with enditure ablished

ucational 2017 p

through hey have produce learning nted No ncy and ools for ement of dardized 1 p 14

ducation directors esources

reform rates are

ntralized nsus that external

our areas valuation ility for urces 4) ystem is chool is

nsibility n school they are

ucational relevant 013) the rameters gislative

framewclimate conductAccordprocessits objecperformstandardeffectivfor eachof the sregionaevaluatiand stuintegratevaluatisystem 24 ConSo far iidentifieparametdetermito take that it aand thoeducatioresponsas well defines educatioIn summdirectorthe relework Tand in tof climachievinschool effectivproceduother wshould characte

work the exeand pedag

ting teachiing to Saϊti

s of evaluatinctives and t

mance standds and d) co

veness OECh region to ischool netwal director foion and assudent assesting studention school of assessme

nsiderationsit is understed with sufters and cerining the criinto accoun

affects in ororough as ponal leaderssibilities as as from theclear criter

onal adminimary we crs of school evant legislaThe effectivethe level of

mate and atting the objecleaders and

veness of higures as well

words whenconsider theristics of th

ercise of thegogy of theing and ev (2008 p ng the qualitargets and tdards (b) morrecting de

CD (2011 pimprove the

work to estaor making ssessment frassment balt formative aself evaluatent and evas About Dratood that thefficient objertainly not aiteria for thnt as far as rder procespossible Alship we musthey raised e Greek mairia of effectiistration and

can observeunits has b

ation makeseness also hdevelopmenitudes It isctives that ad their leadgh-level eduas common

n we refer tohis as a dyhe personal

e work of sue school unvaluating s15) the eva

ity of the edthe process

measuring peviations Am 43) recom

e efficiency ablish perfostep-by-stepamework stlancing extassessment tion with a vluation base

awing the Ase effectivenectively to a

a concept whe effectivenpossible obs off assesslso in the st take into afrom both tinly legislativeness whid less as crithat the ev

een done bos it clear thhas to do wint of the hums understoore come witdership stylucation pren acceptableo the concepynamic comity of the le

77

upervision annit planningstudents scaluation of

ducation proof such con

performancemong other

mmended toof the use o

ormance agp progress totudent asseternal and in the evalu

view to desied on resultssessment o

ness of educa large extehich is non-ness of the ebjective andsing leadersh

criticism waccount boththe various tion governich are set miteria evaluavaluation anoth at adminhat the direcith meeting

uman resourd from the th appropriale which isesuppose thee criteria forpt of effectmplex funceader and hi

In

nd evaluatiog organizecientific anthe educativided and thntrol consise (c) compar measures i Greece wa

of human regreements boward agreessment by ateacher-bas

uation and aigning and its and outcoof Educationcational leadent compar-measurableeducationald measurablhip to be as

we can exerh the admindefinitions

ning the opemore as objeation nd assessmenistrative anctor provideobjectives bces of educabove that

ate behavious exercisede existencer assessing thtive educatioction basedis team cult

nternational R

on the evalu and prepa

nd professioonal projecthe degree ofts of four staring the mn order to e

as to set goaesources andetween the ed goals imaligning edused assessmassessment mplementin

omes nal Leadersdership is a rative and me theoretica

administrale criteria os meritocratrt on the e

nistrative sidwe have seration of edectives and

ent of the end teaching es administrboth at the aational unitt effectivenurs particul Maintaininof commonhe quality aonal leaders

d on foundature and ma

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

uation of tharation of teonal devel

ct is the conf implementages a) Se

measuremenenhance eduals and bencd the rationa Ministry a

mplementatiducational stments of lframeworkng a compre

ship Effectivconcept tha

multiple crital and subjeation it is neof all the adtic fair meeffectivenesde off the leaet for the leaducational ucompetence

effectiveneslevel provi

trative and tadministratits and the foness is the rlar characterng the qua

nly acceptedand effectiveship evaluaations suchaturity of th

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

he school eaching lopment ntinuous tation of tting the

nt to the ucational chmarks alization and each on of an tandards learning teacher ehensive

veness at can be teria and ctive In ecessary dressees asurable s of the adership adership

units and es of the

ss of the ided that teaching ive level ormation result of ristics of

ality and d control eness In

ation we h as the

he group

with a sa constr3 Meth31 A SuAssessistakehoaffects into accother pafollowsbe holisand recspecificconcernthe recithereforeach of be muchwill incand shomulti-shoutside multitudThe evadirectioobjectivMore spexamplcriteria performsuch as of rightA seconthe genperformwith thsynergistrengthsuitablewith otprofessi

set specific ructive objehodology uggestion foing the effecolders Whe

then the procount all thearties and ths that a modstic and muipients that

c quantitativning the respipients of thre be differe

f them accorh more effe

clude the criortcomings hareholding

of the edude and divealuation of

on of a sve-directionpecifically e students of the pe

mance of pupanalytical

t attitudes annd goal in a

neral schoolmance or effhe local comes with othehening of re school climther interesional bodies

targets and ectively and

for a Holisticctiveness ofn the evaluocess is incoe addresseeshe respectiv

del of evaluaultifaceted it the educatve and qualipective recihe educatioent as well rding to the rective objecisis concurrof leadersh

g assessmenucational e

ersity of the effectivenepecific obj

n a first goastudent com

erformance pils in the vasynthetic cnd the shapianother direl communityfectiveness ommunity aner schools crelations anmate engagsted schools organizat

the objectivd defined pr

c Educationf educationaation relies omplete uns and does nve objectiveation of the ie to includional leaderitative criteripient and b

onal leadersas the criterespective octive meritently of ma

hip on focunt At the sanvironmentparties and

ess in educajective and

al in a specmmunity In

or effectivarious courscritical thinking of a cultction of eduy In this dof the educand the insticreation of

nd cooperatgement in exs or grouptions

78

ves pursuedrocess

nal Leadersal leadership

only to onenambiguousnot consideres and targeteducationalde to the furship influeria for the ebring about ship are maeria of effecobjectives thtocratic muany differenused issues ame time itt possible i

d evaluation ational leadd subseque

cific directin this directiveness of ses and finaking and abture ucational le

direction theational leadeitutions thea climate of

tion with thxtracurricul

ps such as

In

d respectivel

ship Evaluatp is a procese aspect wh

s and contror the implicts set by thel leadership

ullest extentences and frffectivenesssignificant

any and diffctiveness of hat will putulti-faceted int sides will

and will lim will operatinterventionmembers w

dership is a ent to the

ion of educion the indivthe educati

al exams theility knowl

adership cae individualership can be associatiof cooperatiohe parents lar activitiesthe structu

nternational R

ly in a give

tion Model ss that involhich the eduversial becaations effecem In the li to be fair apossible a

rom each ins of the eduresults to e

ferent fromf the educati Such an evintegrated al highlight smit biased cte in a restrn effort duwhich are ac

function ofe individua

cational leadvidual objecional leadee developmeledge acquis

an be for exl objectivesbe the develon of parenton the visioof pupils ts the netwoures of the

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

en time peri

lves many d

ucational leaause it does cts of leadeight of the aand effectivall interestednterested siducational leaeach of them

m each otherional leader

valuation moand functionspecific weacriticism durictive formue preciselyctively invof the generaal criteria

dership canctives and thership may ent of specifsition deve

xample pars and criterilopment of r

nts networkon of the schthe formati

orking of th local com

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

od with

different adership not take

ership on above it e should d parties de to set adership m Since r it will rship for odel will nal as it aknesses ue to its

m in any y to the

olved al initial of this

n be for herefore

be the fic skills

elopment

ents and ia of the relations king and hool the ion of a e school

mmunity

A third and admindividuleadershattitudeadminisleadershefficienparticipattainmA fourthcurrentindividuleadershapplicatthis theplanninthe limi4 DesigThe prothe effIndicatothis resAdminiadvancidevelopconstrumeaninThis wosupportthey leaand opethe jobthe mosThe evaweightiholistic educatiocommucommuwith intof onlyevaluati

goal in anoministrative ual objectivhip can be

es and behastrative pership is exer

ncy the reipation of th

ment of the ph goal in an regulated ual objectivhip can betion of the ee fulfilment ng organisaitation and egning the Eoposed modfectiveness ors amp Standspectively istration (20ing school p and supporct approprigful work oork requiretsmdashthe profarn and worerations of th educationast productivaluation moiness factorsmodel of e

onal community ie stunity ie parternal or exty a few coion of scho

ther directiocommunity

ves and crithe developaviours thsonnel are sarcised the inforcementhem in takpedagogical nother direceducation

ves and crie the unhinexisting eduof the organ

ation coordielimination Evaluation del should in

of the edudards) depen

Besides a015) whichleadership

rt teachers iate organizoutside of ths education

fessional caprk family anhe school T

al leaders neve and benefdel can alsos in each indvaluation o

munity ie tudents or rents assocternal evalu

ountries in ools and tea

on of educay ie teacheiteria of thpment of teeir empowatisfied by tstrengtheni

t of teamwking decisio

and operatiction of edupolicy of t

iteria of thndered funcucational legnisational aination and of any formModel of Enclude clearucational l

nding on theaccording th is a cons educationcreate positzational pol

he classroomnal leaders tpacity of teand communThus given teed new stanficial to studo be flexibledividual dirf educationateachers anpupils depiation of pa

uators BesidEurope wi

aching or in

79

ational leadeers and admhe performaachers skil

werment thetheir work ting of thei

work and coons accordiional goals

ucational leathe Ministr

he performactional orggislation wi

and other objd operation om of delinquEducationar objectivesleadership e particular to USA Nsortium of nal leaders tive workinglicies and

m that has a pto build anachers and snity engagemthis growingndards to gudents e and adjustrection or gral leadershind or profending on

arents and tdes accordiithout externdeed any

In

ership can bministrative pance or efflls the creae extent tothe degree or knowledgooperation ing to the respectively

adership canry and the ance or effanizational ith the minijectives setof the schoouency al Leadershs and corres(EKPIS Eeducational

National Poprofessionaduties and

g conditionssystems anpowerful imd strengthestaff the proment and eg knowledguide their pr

table enabliroup of criteip will be abfessors adm

the educatthe structuring to OECrnal assessmother comp

nternational R

e for examppersonnel Ifectiveness tion and cu

o which boof satisfactioge the impbetween thleadership

y n be the impcountry In

fectiveness structure o

mum possib the observol within th

hip Effectivponding cri

Educational l level and tholicy Boardal organizatd actions ins effectivelynd engage

mpact on whn a networkofessional cffective effe and the ch

ractice in dir

ing it to regueria Accordble to includministrative tional levele of the MiD (2011 pment of le

parative me

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

mple the eduIn this direcof the edu

ultivation ofoth academon from theprovement hem the in

style appl

plementation this direcof the eduof the schble deviatio

vance of prohe financial

veness iteria for ev

Key Perfohe specific nd for Edutions commnvolve reley allocate rein other d

hat happens rk of organicommunity ificient manahanging demrections tha

gulate and foding to the de as evalua staff the l the localinistry of Ed 14) Greecearning or echanism of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ucational tion the

ucational f correct

mics and way the of their

ncreased lied the

on of the ction the ucational ool the

ons from cedures budget

valuating ormance needs of

ucational mitted to entlessly esources eep and inside it

izational in which agement

mands of at will be

ormulate above a

ators the student

l school ducation ce is one external

f quality

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

observeCommomarkersspecificstaff byteachersmaximuparentaproductnever pand sucMany omissionStrongeeducatioin relatiGrigsbyespeciaMapp 22015 PAlso othschool u(Catanoexperienof strateperceptsmooth materiacollaborthrough(1999) learningmutual confideof the influencinformaEducatiof systethroughperformmemberinforma

e the schoolonwealth Ses of interncally describy the heads structuredum communl and comtive divisionpossible for ccessful (Drof the internn and achieve 2006) Thonal schooion to many y Peters 20lly in relati2002 Leith

Portin et alher researchunit (Macbeo amp Strongnce in matteegies and mion of scho

operation al-Guide to eration inter

hout the eduan effectiveg opportunirespect set

ence createsschool hasce the memation collabional leaderems that enshout a set ofmance evalurs of work fation to info

ls effectiveecretariat (1nal performbes the indi the involvd lessons inication betmmunity inn of laboura school w

rucker 2012ationally ac

vement of ghe role of ll and the endifferent pa

015) creatinion to studehwood 200 2009) and hers looked eath 2001)ge 2006) ers of admin

methods and ool as a livi

as well aeducationalrest that conucational ce director mities It hasts goals ands positive ps the ability

mbers of theborate with rship and msure the impf integrated puation can onfit into the worm educati

eness in term1993) in its mance worcators of Sc

vement of tntellectuallytween teachnvolvementr among teawhich does 2) ccepted charoals are theleadership intire educatiarameters sng a sense ent outcom2 Leithwoteachers exat the effec the correlaThe effec

nistration anexpertise inng organism

as to the p act c) to juntribute to tommunity

motivates stus a stable ad conducts pleasant andy to guide school com

pupils paremanagement plementatiopractices innly be optimwhole organonal policy

74

ms of the g report descrking extechool Effecthe heads oy challengi

hers and pupt positive achers and not meet th

racteristics oe product ofin educatioion systemsuch as the sof commun

mes for exaood et al 20xpectations ctiveness ofation betwective directnd educationn economicm where thperception ustice undethe developm(Stravakou

udents and eadministrativ

them has d creative cstudents an

mmunity anents teachinprocesses

on of educatn order to acmised throunization sys

y and strateg

In

good moral cribes the sernal concectiveness asof departmeng teaching

pils efficienclimate c

good parenhe expectati

of school eff an effectivn is of cata and its effe

school climanity in schoample pupil004 OECDfrom the sch

f leadership een evaluatitor possessn and skills cs constructe human faof the ana

erstanding lment of stro 2003) Aseducators anve path crflexibility limate rationd enforce

nd to lead thng staff andinvolve the

tional policihieve speci

ugh a clear ustem It lookgy and invol

nternational R

mannersrsquo ochool effec

erns and s ldquoPurposefuent the invg work-cennt and accurconsistency

ntal reportrdquoions of soc

fficiency sucve school leaalytic imporectiveness hate (Cliffordol (Beck amps achievem

D 2013 Allehool leader through sel

ion and perfes profounconsisting otion and othactor is the alytical proleniency apong interpers they say nd promoteedibility crand takes ionally mana

disciplinehem to posiother bodie

e arrangemeies strategiefic educatiounderstandinks at how mlves the app

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of the childrctiveness asstaff outputful leadershivolvement ntered envirrate record ky among t Nevertheleciety to be e

uch as sharedadership (C

ortance for bhas been resd et al 2012

amp Foster 19ment (Henden Grigsby(Thompson

lf-assessmenformance stnd knowledof a) the poher matters bkey to bala

ogram as appreciation rsonal relatEverard amp

es the offer reates a cliinitiatives Iages the eco has the abitive resultses ent and depes and actio

onal targetsng of how d

managementplication of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ren The general t More ip of the of other ronment keeping teachers ess it is effective

d vision Catano amp both the searched 2 Allen 999) and erson amp

y Peters n 2017) nt of the tandards dge and ssession b) in the

ance and a single respect

ionships Morris

of equal imate of It shows onomics bility to

s collect

loyment on plans Process different t gathers systems

standardprocesswith debe effedecisionfurther Hence quantitasuch as could b23 ThePoints 231 ScUntil th1967-741980s school awere mimplemevaluatipedagogeducatioand evenon-impforms self-eva2017 pit was vas puniautonom232 SeStartingself-evaschoolsDecisiois requi233 TeIn paralteacher their tensubject relevant

ds coverings performanesirable resuectively hanns at all m(Schoderbean evaluati

ative criteriaacademic ae more effee Evaluatio

chool and The 1980s tea4 military rand againstadvisors wa

meant to unmented A la

ion was nogical guidaonal evaluaen some stuplementatioof educatioaluation of 56) But ac

very hard to itive and comy (IEP 20elf-Evaluatig from the 2aluation becs The legislon 30972Γ1red to set iteacher Apprllel to schoappraisal s

nure in posto appraisa

t education

g quality mnce is well dults then genndled and c

management ek Cosier ampion of leadea of achieveand adminisective objecon of Educa

Teacher Evaacher evaluaregime inst this historas introducendertake thater law (Lat implemen

ance and sution in schoudents and on in practional evaluaschool unit

ccording to Idevelop a c

ontrolling m016) ion of Schoo201314 schcame complation (Circu105-03-201ts own educraisal ol self-evalystem to be

sts of respoal by their advisors on

management documentednerates factcontinuousllevels that

amp Aplin 198er effectiveement towarstrative stafctively accoational Syst

luation in Gation was thpection becrical backgred Accordihe evaluatiow 1566 of

nted during tupport to teools were me

parents leaice In the ation focuss rather thaInstitute of Eculture of evmeans jeop

ols hool year anpulsory for ulars 3097314) states thational goal

uation a pre implemennsibility Arespective

n education

75

systems (Ld and analyss on the basly improvet in turn im88) eness based rds targets wff students ountable mtem in Gre

Greece he job of schcame assocround insping to the thon of the e1985) whicthe 1980s Seachers Sevet with fiercading eithe2000s the sing on than on indivEducationalvaluation ofpardising ra

nd followinr all types C105-03-

hat at the bels and plan

residential dnted from 20According to

line managnal matters

In

Lewis Goosed with a msis of whichd This fun

mprove edu

in transparwhich have b

school commetricate andeece A Sho

hool inspectciated with pection washen law (Leducationalch also incluSchool adviveral attemce oppositior to their foemphasis c

he evaluatiovidual teachl Policy the f them and aather than r

ng a two-yeof pre-prim2013 1900ginning of ehow to reac

decree (PD01415 linko this propogers on admso a teache

nternational R

odman amp Fmethodical h the procesnctional infucational pr

rent objectibeen set fro

mmunity incd broader acort Retrospe

tors and parpolitical coabolished

1304 of 198l system buded referesors concenpts in the

on by teacheormal invalchanged to on of educhers (Verdis

context remassessment einforcing

ar pilot promary prima89C110-1each schoolch them (OE

D 1522013ked to teachosal educatministrativeerrsquos appraisa

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Fandt 1995)way and co

sses in quesformation srocess perfo

ive qualitaom all stake corporating ccepted modection and

rticularly duontrol In th and the sy82) school but this waences to eduntrated on pr1990s to in

ersrsquo unions lidation or more parti

cational wos 2002) in mained one i

as it was ofschool and

oject annuaary and se2-2013 Mil year everyECD 2017

3) introducehersrsquo promotion staff w

e matters aal would be

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

) When ompared stion can supports ormance

tive and holders parents

del Critical

uring the he early ystem of advisors

as never ucational roviding ntroduce teachers to their

icipative ork and (OECD in which ften seen d teacher

al school econdary inisterial y school p 56)

ed a new tion and

would be and their e carried

out by tthe direform ofoppositreductioprocessevaluati56) Over threformsoften famajor gobjectivreliableeffectivmeasurilearningnationaOECD In Greesystemshave thStrengthRecentllow in Gschool school accountof respoand deeducatiocooperaconfirmmainly To thisadminisinvited 234 EdAt this leadershlegislatievaluatiincludin

the school hector of eduf the appraision by manons due to ts of school sion process

he past years in educatioailed to makglobal resulves are conce indicatorsveness of Ging the qualg outcomes l assessmen 2017 p 9

ece accordis in Europehe least auhening scholy there havGreece eduleaders in Gself-evalua

tability (OEonsibility asevelopment onal leaderation with

med also by a recipient

s point it istration is sto lead (Muducational Lpoint howehip in Greeion Accordion of the ng the exe

head and reucation and sal report weny teachers athe crisis) Tself-evaluaties includin

rs Greek goon effectiveke a real imlts as far ascerned News are in plGreek educality and effeas there are

nts nor exte 53) ng to OECD

e which funuthority comool leadersh

ve been moducational ouGreece curration shoul

ECD 2017 s key to inc

of teacher itself 3) other schoo Papanaoumand executois worth m

sometimes nulford 2003Leadership ever it is aece is definding to the Pdirectors oercise of a

levant schothe relevanere defined and by teachThe teacherion previou

ng school se

overnmentseness Howe

mpact on thes the perforw laws havlace to proation systemectiveness oe neither external evalua

D (2011 pctions ineffmpared to hip is one odest moves utcomes remrently haveld be reinp 7) The a

creasing theer quality

strategic mols The abm (1995) wor of circulamentioning not due to i3) Evaluation

appropriate tned throughPresidential of school unadministrativ

76

ool advisor rnt educationcentrally Thersrsquo unionrsrsquo unions thusly perceivlf-evaluatio

s have sougever wheree quality andrmance of sve often beeovide inform The sysof the educaternal assesations of sc

p 24) we hafectively Oother coun

of the mosttowards de

main weak e limited resntroduced agencys OE

e effectivene2) objecti

managemenbove claim which statesars and orde

that to a its leaders

to mentionh the perspeDecree (PD

nits is carrve and org

In

respectivelyn advisor ThThis teacher ns (in the cohen reacted

ved in position were lsquofro

ght to addree reforms had efficiencystudents anden enacted brmation onstem cannoation systemssments of lechools and t

ave one of tOne of the antries is in t crucial chacentralizatioand the syssponsibilitietogether w

ECD (2011)ess of the Dives evalunt of financ

on the ces that the ders for all th

large extebut to the v

how the efective by thD 1522013ied out in ganisational

nternational R

y and that ohe criteria appraisal syntext of edu

d against theve terms Aozenrsquo in 201

ss a numbeave been inty of the systd the achievbut not fullyn the qualit rely on c

m and the actearning basteaching (O

the most cereas in whimanaging

allenges foron but whistem is still es and there

with some ) research id

Director 1) ation and cial and huntralized edirector at the main issue

ent the defvery system

ffectivenesshe framewo3 FEK Α 2five categol work wit

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of a school proceduresystem was mucation expe newly est

All these edu15 (OECD

er of issues troduced thtem and to vement of y implemenity efficienconsistent ttual achievesed on stand

OECD 2011

entralized edich school d

human rer education ile dropout r

highly cenre is consen

form of dentified fosupport evaccountabi

uman resouducation syhe Greek Ses of responficiency in

m in which

s of the eduork of the

24005-11-2ories of parthin the leg

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

head by and the met with enditure ablished

ucational 2017 p

through hey have produce learning nted No ncy and ools for ement of dardized 1 p 14

ducation directors esources

reform rates are

ntralized nsus that external

our areas valuation ility for urces 4) ystem is chool is

nsibility n school they are

ucational relevant 013) the rameters gislative

framewclimate conductAccordprocessits objecperformstandardeffectivfor eachof the sregionaevaluatiand stuintegratevaluatisystem 24 ConSo far iidentifieparametdetermito take that it aand thoeducatioresponsas well defines educatioIn summdirectorthe relework Tand in tof climachievinschool effectivproceduother wshould characte

work the exeand pedag

ting teachiing to Saϊti

s of evaluatinctives and t

mance standds and d) co

veness OECh region to ischool netwal director foion and assudent assesting studention school of assessme

nsiderationsit is understed with sufters and cerining the criinto accoun

affects in ororough as ponal leaderssibilities as as from theclear criter

onal adminimary we crs of school evant legislaThe effectivethe level of

mate and atting the objecleaders and

veness of higures as well

words whenconsider theristics of th

ercise of thegogy of theing and ev (2008 p ng the qualitargets and tdards (b) morrecting de

CD (2011 pimprove the

work to estaor making ssessment frassment balt formative aself evaluatent and evas About Dratood that thefficient objertainly not aiteria for thnt as far as rder procespossible Alship we musthey raised e Greek mairia of effectiistration and

can observeunits has b

ation makeseness also hdevelopmenitudes It isctives that ad their leadgh-level eduas common

n we refer tohis as a dyhe personal

e work of sue school unvaluating s15) the eva

ity of the edthe process

measuring peviations Am 43) recom

e efficiency ablish perfostep-by-stepamework stlancing extassessment tion with a vluation base

awing the Ase effectivenectively to a

a concept whe effectivenpossible obs off assesslso in the st take into afrom both tinly legislativeness whid less as crithat the ev

een done bos it clear thhas to do wint of the hums understoore come witdership stylucation pren acceptableo the concepynamic comity of the le

77

upervision annit planningstudents scaluation of

ducation proof such con

performancemong other

mmended toof the use o

ormance agp progress totudent asseternal and in the evalu

view to desied on resultssessment o

ness of educa large extehich is non-ness of the ebjective andsing leadersh

criticism waccount boththe various tion governich are set miteria evaluavaluation anoth at adminhat the direcith meeting

uman resourd from the th appropriale which isesuppose thee criteria forpt of effectmplex funceader and hi

In

nd evaluatiog organizecientific anthe educativided and thntrol consise (c) compar measures i Greece wa

of human regreements boward agreessment by ateacher-bas

uation and aigning and its and outcoof Educationcational leadent compar-measurableeducationald measurablhip to be as

we can exerh the admindefinitions

ning the opemore as objeation nd assessmenistrative anctor provideobjectives bces of educabove that

ate behavious exercisede existencer assessing thtive educatioction basedis team cult

nternational R

on the evalu and prepa

nd professioonal projecthe degree ofts of four staring the mn order to e

as to set goaesources andetween the ed goals imaligning edused assessmassessment mplementin

omes nal Leadersdership is a rative and me theoretica

administrale criteria os meritocratrt on the e

nistrative sidwe have seration of edectives and

ent of the end teaching es administrboth at the aational unitt effectivenurs particul Maintaininof commonhe quality aonal leaders

d on foundature and ma

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

uation of tharation of teonal devel

ct is the conf implementages a) Se

measuremenenhance eduals and bencd the rationa Ministry a

mplementatiducational stments of lframeworkng a compre

ship Effectivconcept tha

multiple crital and subjeation it is neof all the adtic fair meeffectivenesde off the leaet for the leaducational ucompetence

effectiveneslevel provi

trative and tadministratits and the foness is the rlar characterng the qua

nly acceptedand effectiveship evaluaations suchaturity of th

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

he school eaching lopment ntinuous tation of tting the

nt to the ucational chmarks alization and each on of an tandards learning teacher ehensive

veness at can be teria and ctive In ecessary dressees asurable s of the adership adership

units and es of the

ss of the ided that teaching ive level ormation result of ristics of

ality and d control eness In

ation we h as the

he group

with a sa constr3 Meth31 A SuAssessistakehoaffects into accother pafollowsbe holisand recspecificconcernthe recithereforeach of be muchwill incand shomulti-shoutside multitudThe evadirectioobjectivMore spexamplcriteria performsuch as of rightA seconthe genperformwith thsynergistrengthsuitablewith otprofessi

set specific ructive objehodology uggestion foing the effecolders Whe

then the procount all thearties and ths that a modstic and muipients that

c quantitativning the respipients of thre be differe

f them accorh more effe

clude the criortcomings hareholding

of the edude and divealuation of

on of a sve-directionpecifically e students of the pe

mance of pupanalytical

t attitudes annd goal in a

neral schoolmance or effhe local comes with othehening of re school climther interesional bodies

targets and ectively and

for a Holisticctiveness ofn the evaluocess is incoe addresseeshe respectiv

del of evaluaultifaceted it the educatve and qualipective recihe educatioent as well rding to the rective objecisis concurrof leadersh

g assessmenucational e

ersity of the effectivenepecific obj

n a first goastudent com

erformance pils in the vasynthetic cnd the shapianother direl communityfectiveness ommunity aner schools crelations anmate engagsted schools organizat

the objectivd defined pr

c Educationf educationaation relies omplete uns and does nve objectiveation of the ie to includional leaderitative criteripient and b

onal leadersas the criterespective octive meritently of ma

hip on focunt At the sanvironmentparties and

ess in educajective and

al in a specmmunity In

or effectivarious courscritical thinking of a cultction of eduy In this dof the educand the insticreation of

nd cooperatgement in exs or grouptions

78

ves pursuedrocess

nal Leadersal leadership

only to onenambiguousnot consideres and targeteducationalde to the furship influeria for the ebring about ship are maeria of effecobjectives thtocratic muany differenused issues ame time itt possible i

d evaluation ational leadd subseque

cific directin this directiveness of ses and finaking and abture ucational le

direction theational leadeitutions thea climate of

tion with thxtracurricul

ps such as

In

d respectivel

ship Evaluatp is a procese aspect wh

s and contror the implicts set by thel leadership

ullest extentences and frffectivenesssignificant

any and diffctiveness of hat will putulti-faceted int sides will

and will lim will operatinterventionmembers w

dership is a ent to the

ion of educion the indivthe educati

al exams theility knowl

adership cae individualership can be associatiof cooperatiohe parents lar activitiesthe structu

nternational R

ly in a give

tion Model ss that involhich the eduversial becaations effecem In the li to be fair apossible a

rom each ins of the eduresults to e

ferent fromf the educati Such an evintegrated al highlight smit biased cte in a restrn effort duwhich are ac

function ofe individua

cational leadvidual objecional leadee developmeledge acquis

an be for exl objectivesbe the develon of parenton the visioof pupils ts the netwoures of the

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

en time peri

lves many d

ucational leaause it does cts of leadeight of the aand effectivall interestednterested siducational leaeach of them

m each otherional leader

valuation moand functionspecific weacriticism durictive formue preciselyctively invof the generaal criteria

dership canctives and thership may ent of specifsition deve

xample pars and criterilopment of r

nts networkon of the schthe formati

orking of th local com

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

od with

different adership not take

ership on above it e should d parties de to set adership m Since r it will rship for odel will nal as it aknesses ue to its

m in any y to the

olved al initial of this

n be for herefore

be the fic skills

elopment

ents and ia of the relations king and hool the ion of a e school

mmunity

A third and admindividuleadershattitudeadminisleadershefficienparticipattainmA fourthcurrentindividuleadershapplicatthis theplanninthe limi4 DesigThe prothe effIndicatothis resAdminiadvancidevelopconstrumeaninThis wosupportthey leaand opethe jobthe mosThe evaweightiholistic educatiocommucommuwith intof onlyevaluati

goal in anoministrative ual objectivhip can be

es and behastrative pership is exer

ncy the reipation of th

ment of the ph goal in an regulated ual objectivhip can betion of the ee fulfilment ng organisaitation and egning the Eoposed modfectiveness ors amp Standspectively istration (20ing school p and supporct approprigful work oork requiretsmdashthe profarn and worerations of th educationast productivaluation moiness factorsmodel of e

onal community ie stunity ie parternal or exty a few coion of scho

ther directiocommunity

ves and crithe developaviours thsonnel are sarcised the inforcementhem in takpedagogical nother direceducation

ves and crie the unhinexisting eduof the organ

ation coordielimination Evaluation del should in

of the edudards) depen

Besides a015) whichleadership

rt teachers iate organizoutside of ths education

fessional caprk family anhe school T

al leaders neve and benefdel can alsos in each indvaluation o

munity ie tudents or rents assocternal evalu

ountries in ools and tea

on of educay ie teacheiteria of thpment of teeir empowatisfied by tstrengtheni

t of teamwking decisio

and operatiction of edupolicy of t

iteria of thndered funcucational legnisational aination and of any formModel of Enclude clearucational l

nding on theaccording th is a cons educationcreate positzational pol

he classroomnal leaders tpacity of teand communThus given teed new stanficial to studo be flexibledividual dirf educationateachers anpupils depiation of pa

uators BesidEurope wi

aching or in

79

ational leadeers and admhe performaachers skil

werment thetheir work ting of thei

work and coons accordiional goals

ucational leathe Ministr

he performactional orggislation wi

and other objd operation om of delinquEducationar objectivesleadership e particular to USA Nsortium of nal leaders tive workinglicies and

m that has a pto build anachers and snity engagemthis growingndards to gudents e and adjustrection or gral leadershind or profending on

arents and tdes accordiithout externdeed any

In

ership can bministrative pance or efflls the creae extent tothe degree or knowledgooperation ing to the respectively

adership canry and the ance or effanizational ith the minijectives setof the schoouency al Leadershs and corres(EKPIS Eeducational

National Poprofessionaduties and

g conditionssystems anpowerful imd strengthestaff the proment and eg knowledguide their pr

table enabliroup of criteip will be abfessors adm

the educatthe structuring to OECrnal assessmother comp

nternational R

e for examppersonnel Ifectiveness tion and cu

o which boof satisfactioge the impbetween thleadership

y n be the impcountry In

fectiveness structure o

mum possib the observol within th

hip Effectivponding cri

Educational l level and tholicy Boardal organizatd actions ins effectivelynd engage

mpact on whn a networkofessional cffective effe and the ch

ractice in dir

ing it to regueria Accordble to includministrative tional levele of the MiD (2011 pment of le

parative me

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

mple the eduIn this direcof the edu

ultivation ofoth academon from theprovement hem the in

style appl

plementation this direcof the eduof the schble deviatio

vance of prohe financial

veness iteria for ev

Key Perfohe specific nd for Edutions commnvolve reley allocate rein other d

hat happens rk of organicommunity ificient manahanging demrections tha

gulate and foding to the de as evalua staff the l the localinistry of Ed 14) Greecearning or echanism of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ucational tion the

ucational f correct

mics and way the of their

ncreased lied the

on of the ction the ucational ool the

ons from cedures budget

valuating ormance needs of

ucational mitted to entlessly esources eep and inside it

izational in which agement

mands of at will be

ormulate above a

ators the student

l school ducation ce is one external

f quality

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

standardprocesswith debe effedecisionfurther Hence quantitasuch as could b23 ThePoints 231 ScUntil th1967-741980s school awere mimplemevaluatipedagogeducatioand evenon-impforms self-eva2017 pit was vas puniautonom232 SeStartingself-evaschoolsDecisiois requi233 TeIn paralteacher their tensubject relevant

ds coverings performanesirable resuectively hanns at all m(Schoderbean evaluati

ative criteriaacademic ae more effee Evaluatio

chool and The 1980s tea4 military rand againstadvisors wa

meant to unmented A la

ion was nogical guidaonal evaluaen some stuplementatioof educatioaluation of 56) But ac

very hard to itive and comy (IEP 20elf-Evaluatig from the 2aluation becs The legislon 30972Γ1red to set iteacher Apprllel to schoappraisal s

nure in posto appraisa

t education

g quality mnce is well dults then genndled and c

management ek Cosier ampion of leadea of achieveand adminisective objecon of Educa

Teacher Evaacher evaluaregime inst this historas introducendertake thater law (Lat implemen

ance and sution in schoudents and on in practional evaluaschool unit

ccording to Idevelop a c

ontrolling m016) ion of Schoo201314 schcame complation (Circu105-03-201ts own educraisal ol self-evalystem to be

sts of respoal by their advisors on

management documentednerates factcontinuousllevels that

amp Aplin 198er effectiveement towarstrative stafctively accoational Syst

luation in Gation was thpection becrical backgred Accordihe evaluatiow 1566 of

nted during tupport to teools were me

parents leaice In the ation focuss rather thaInstitute of Eculture of evmeans jeop

ols hool year anpulsory for ulars 3097314) states thational goal

uation a pre implemennsibility Arespective

n education

75

systems (Ld and analyss on the basly improvet in turn im88) eness based rds targets wff students ountable mtem in Gre

Greece he job of schcame assocround insping to the thon of the e1985) whicthe 1980s Seachers Sevet with fiercading eithe2000s the sing on than on indivEducationalvaluation ofpardising ra

nd followinr all types C105-03-

hat at the bels and plan

residential dnted from 20According to

line managnal matters

In

Lewis Goosed with a msis of whichd This fun

mprove edu

in transparwhich have b

school commetricate andeece A Sho

hool inspectciated with pection washen law (Leducationalch also incluSchool adviveral attemce oppositior to their foemphasis c

he evaluatiovidual teachl Policy the f them and aather than r

ng a two-yeof pre-prim2013 1900ginning of ehow to reac

decree (PD01415 linko this propogers on admso a teache

nternational R

odman amp Fmethodical h the procesnctional infucational pr

rent objectibeen set fro

mmunity incd broader acort Retrospe

tors and parpolitical coabolished

1304 of 198l system buded referesors concenpts in the

on by teacheormal invalchanged to on of educhers (Verdis

context remassessment einforcing

ar pilot promary prima89C110-1each schoolch them (OE

D 1522013ked to teachosal educatministrativeerrsquos appraisa

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Fandt 1995)way and co

sses in quesformation srocess perfo

ive qualitaom all stake corporating ccepted modection and

rticularly duontrol In th and the sy82) school but this waences to eduntrated on pr1990s to in

ersrsquo unions lidation or more parti

cational wos 2002) in mained one i

as it was ofschool and

oject annuaary and se2-2013 Mil year everyECD 2017

3) introducehersrsquo promotion staff w

e matters aal would be

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

) When ompared stion can supports ormance

tive and holders parents

del Critical

uring the he early ystem of advisors

as never ucational roviding ntroduce teachers to their

icipative ork and (OECD in which ften seen d teacher

al school econdary inisterial y school p 56)

ed a new tion and

would be and their e carried

out by tthe direform ofoppositreductioprocessevaluati56) Over threformsoften famajor gobjectivreliableeffectivmeasurilearningnationaOECD In Greesystemshave thStrengthRecentllow in Gschool school accountof respoand deeducatiocooperaconfirmmainly To thisadminisinvited 234 EdAt this leadershlegislatievaluatiincludin

the school hector of eduf the appraision by manons due to ts of school sion process

he past years in educatioailed to makglobal resulves are conce indicatorsveness of Ging the qualg outcomes l assessmen 2017 p 9

ece accordis in Europehe least auhening scholy there havGreece eduleaders in Gself-evalua

tability (OEonsibility asevelopment onal leaderation with

med also by a recipient

s point it istration is sto lead (Muducational Lpoint howehip in Greeion Accordion of the ng the exe

head and reucation and sal report weny teachers athe crisis) Tself-evaluaties includin

rs Greek goon effectiveke a real imlts as far ascerned News are in plGreek educality and effeas there are

nts nor exte 53) ng to OECD

e which funuthority comool leadersh

ve been moducational ouGreece curration shoul

ECD 2017 s key to inc

of teacher itself 3) other schoo Papanaoumand executois worth m

sometimes nulford 2003Leadership ever it is aece is definding to the Pdirectors oercise of a

levant schothe relevanere defined and by teachThe teacherion previou

ng school se

overnmentseness Howe

mpact on thes the perforw laws havlace to proation systemectiveness oe neither external evalua

D (2011 pctions ineffmpared to hip is one odest moves utcomes remrently haveld be reinp 7) The a

creasing theer quality

strategic mols The abm (1995) wor of circulamentioning not due to i3) Evaluation

appropriate tned throughPresidential of school unadministrativ

76

ool advisor rnt educationcentrally Thersrsquo unionrsrsquo unions thusly perceivlf-evaluatio

s have sougever wheree quality andrmance of sve often beeovide inform The sysof the educaternal assesations of sc

p 24) we hafectively Oother coun

of the mosttowards de

main weak e limited resntroduced agencys OE

e effectivene2) objecti

managemenbove claim which statesars and orde

that to a its leaders

to mentionh the perspeDecree (PD

nits is carrve and org

In

respectivelyn advisor ThThis teacher ns (in the cohen reacted

ved in position were lsquofro

ght to addree reforms had efficiencystudents anden enacted brmation onstem cannoation systemssments of lechools and t

ave one of tOne of the antries is in t crucial chacentralizatioand the syssponsibilitietogether w

ECD (2011)ess of the Dives evalunt of financ

on the ces that the ders for all th

large extebut to the v

how the efective by thD 1522013ied out in ganisational

nternational R

y and that ohe criteria appraisal syntext of edu

d against theve terms Aozenrsquo in 201

ss a numbeave been inty of the systd the achievbut not fullyn the qualit rely on c

m and the actearning basteaching (O

the most cereas in whimanaging

allenges foron but whistem is still es and there

with some ) research id

Director 1) ation and cial and huntralized edirector at the main issue

ent the defvery system

ffectivenesshe framewo3 FEK Α 2five categol work wit

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of a school proceduresystem was mucation expe newly est

All these edu15 (OECD

er of issues troduced thtem and to vement of y implemenity efficienconsistent ttual achievesed on stand

OECD 2011

entralized edich school d

human rer education ile dropout r

highly cenre is consen

form of dentified fosupport evaccountabi

uman resouducation syhe Greek Ses of responficiency in

m in which

s of the eduork of the

24005-11-2ories of parthin the leg

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

head by and the met with enditure ablished

ucational 2017 p

through hey have produce learning nted No ncy and ools for ement of dardized 1 p 14

ducation directors esources

reform rates are

ntralized nsus that external

our areas valuation ility for urces 4) ystem is chool is

nsibility n school they are

ucational relevant 013) the rameters gislative

framewclimate conductAccordprocessits objecperformstandardeffectivfor eachof the sregionaevaluatiand stuintegratevaluatisystem 24 ConSo far iidentifieparametdetermito take that it aand thoeducatioresponsas well defines educatioIn summdirectorthe relework Tand in tof climachievinschool effectivproceduother wshould characte

work the exeand pedag

ting teachiing to Saϊti

s of evaluatinctives and t

mance standds and d) co

veness OECh region to ischool netwal director foion and assudent assesting studention school of assessme

nsiderationsit is understed with sufters and cerining the criinto accoun

affects in ororough as ponal leaderssibilities as as from theclear criter

onal adminimary we crs of school evant legislaThe effectivethe level of

mate and atting the objecleaders and

veness of higures as well

words whenconsider theristics of th

ercise of thegogy of theing and ev (2008 p ng the qualitargets and tdards (b) morrecting de

CD (2011 pimprove the

work to estaor making ssessment frassment balt formative aself evaluatent and evas About Dratood that thefficient objertainly not aiteria for thnt as far as rder procespossible Alship we musthey raised e Greek mairia of effectiistration and

can observeunits has b

ation makeseness also hdevelopmenitudes It isctives that ad their leadgh-level eduas common

n we refer tohis as a dyhe personal

e work of sue school unvaluating s15) the eva

ity of the edthe process

measuring peviations Am 43) recom

e efficiency ablish perfostep-by-stepamework stlancing extassessment tion with a vluation base

awing the Ase effectivenectively to a

a concept whe effectivenpossible obs off assesslso in the st take into afrom both tinly legislativeness whid less as crithat the ev

een done bos it clear thhas to do wint of the hums understoore come witdership stylucation pren acceptableo the concepynamic comity of the le

77

upervision annit planningstudents scaluation of

ducation proof such con

performancemong other

mmended toof the use o

ormance agp progress totudent asseternal and in the evalu

view to desied on resultssessment o

ness of educa large extehich is non-ness of the ebjective andsing leadersh

criticism waccount boththe various tion governich are set miteria evaluavaluation anoth at adminhat the direcith meeting

uman resourd from the th appropriale which isesuppose thee criteria forpt of effectmplex funceader and hi

In

nd evaluatiog organizecientific anthe educativided and thntrol consise (c) compar measures i Greece wa

of human regreements boward agreessment by ateacher-bas

uation and aigning and its and outcoof Educationcational leadent compar-measurableeducationald measurablhip to be as

we can exerh the admindefinitions

ning the opemore as objeation nd assessmenistrative anctor provideobjectives bces of educabove that

ate behavious exercisede existencer assessing thtive educatioction basedis team cult

nternational R

on the evalu and prepa

nd professioonal projecthe degree ofts of four staring the mn order to e

as to set goaesources andetween the ed goals imaligning edused assessmassessment mplementin

omes nal Leadersdership is a rative and me theoretica

administrale criteria os meritocratrt on the e

nistrative sidwe have seration of edectives and

ent of the end teaching es administrboth at the aational unitt effectivenurs particul Maintaininof commonhe quality aonal leaders

d on foundature and ma

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

uation of tharation of teonal devel

ct is the conf implementages a) Se

measuremenenhance eduals and bencd the rationa Ministry a

mplementatiducational stments of lframeworkng a compre

ship Effectivconcept tha

multiple crital and subjeation it is neof all the adtic fair meeffectivenesde off the leaet for the leaducational ucompetence

effectiveneslevel provi

trative and tadministratits and the foness is the rlar characterng the qua

nly acceptedand effectiveship evaluaations suchaturity of th

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

he school eaching lopment ntinuous tation of tting the

nt to the ucational chmarks alization and each on of an tandards learning teacher ehensive

veness at can be teria and ctive In ecessary dressees asurable s of the adership adership

units and es of the

ss of the ided that teaching ive level ormation result of ristics of

ality and d control eness In

ation we h as the

he group

with a sa constr3 Meth31 A SuAssessistakehoaffects into accother pafollowsbe holisand recspecificconcernthe recithereforeach of be muchwill incand shomulti-shoutside multitudThe evadirectioobjectivMore spexamplcriteria performsuch as of rightA seconthe genperformwith thsynergistrengthsuitablewith otprofessi

set specific ructive objehodology uggestion foing the effecolders Whe

then the procount all thearties and ths that a modstic and muipients that

c quantitativning the respipients of thre be differe

f them accorh more effe

clude the criortcomings hareholding

of the edude and divealuation of

on of a sve-directionpecifically e students of the pe

mance of pupanalytical

t attitudes annd goal in a

neral schoolmance or effhe local comes with othehening of re school climther interesional bodies

targets and ectively and

for a Holisticctiveness ofn the evaluocess is incoe addresseeshe respectiv

del of evaluaultifaceted it the educatve and qualipective recihe educatioent as well rding to the rective objecisis concurrof leadersh

g assessmenucational e

ersity of the effectivenepecific obj

n a first goastudent com

erformance pils in the vasynthetic cnd the shapianother direl communityfectiveness ommunity aner schools crelations anmate engagsted schools organizat

the objectivd defined pr

c Educationf educationaation relies omplete uns and does nve objectiveation of the ie to includional leaderitative criteripient and b

onal leadersas the criterespective octive meritently of ma

hip on focunt At the sanvironmentparties and

ess in educajective and

al in a specmmunity In

or effectivarious courscritical thinking of a cultction of eduy In this dof the educand the insticreation of

nd cooperatgement in exs or grouptions

78

ves pursuedrocess

nal Leadersal leadership

only to onenambiguousnot consideres and targeteducationalde to the furship influeria for the ebring about ship are maeria of effecobjectives thtocratic muany differenused issues ame time itt possible i

d evaluation ational leadd subseque

cific directin this directiveness of ses and finaking and abture ucational le

direction theational leadeitutions thea climate of

tion with thxtracurricul

ps such as

In

d respectivel

ship Evaluatp is a procese aspect wh

s and contror the implicts set by thel leadership

ullest extentences and frffectivenesssignificant

any and diffctiveness of hat will putulti-faceted int sides will

and will lim will operatinterventionmembers w

dership is a ent to the

ion of educion the indivthe educati

al exams theility knowl

adership cae individualership can be associatiof cooperatiohe parents lar activitiesthe structu

nternational R

ly in a give

tion Model ss that involhich the eduversial becaations effecem In the li to be fair apossible a

rom each ins of the eduresults to e

ferent fromf the educati Such an evintegrated al highlight smit biased cte in a restrn effort duwhich are ac

function ofe individua

cational leadvidual objecional leadee developmeledge acquis

an be for exl objectivesbe the develon of parenton the visioof pupils ts the netwoures of the

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

en time peri

lves many d

ucational leaause it does cts of leadeight of the aand effectivall interestednterested siducational leaeach of them

m each otherional leader

valuation moand functionspecific weacriticism durictive formue preciselyctively invof the generaal criteria

dership canctives and thership may ent of specifsition deve

xample pars and criterilopment of r

nts networkon of the schthe formati

orking of th local com

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

od with

different adership not take

ership on above it e should d parties de to set adership m Since r it will rship for odel will nal as it aknesses ue to its

m in any y to the

olved al initial of this

n be for herefore

be the fic skills

elopment

ents and ia of the relations king and hool the ion of a e school

mmunity

A third and admindividuleadershattitudeadminisleadershefficienparticipattainmA fourthcurrentindividuleadershapplicatthis theplanninthe limi4 DesigThe prothe effIndicatothis resAdminiadvancidevelopconstrumeaninThis wosupportthey leaand opethe jobthe mosThe evaweightiholistic educatiocommucommuwith intof onlyevaluati

goal in anoministrative ual objectivhip can be

es and behastrative pership is exer

ncy the reipation of th

ment of the ph goal in an regulated ual objectivhip can betion of the ee fulfilment ng organisaitation and egning the Eoposed modfectiveness ors amp Standspectively istration (20ing school p and supporct approprigful work oork requiretsmdashthe profarn and worerations of th educationast productivaluation moiness factorsmodel of e

onal community ie stunity ie parternal or exty a few coion of scho

ther directiocommunity

ves and crithe developaviours thsonnel are sarcised the inforcementhem in takpedagogical nother direceducation

ves and crie the unhinexisting eduof the organ

ation coordielimination Evaluation del should in

of the edudards) depen

Besides a015) whichleadership

rt teachers iate organizoutside of ths education

fessional caprk family anhe school T

al leaders neve and benefdel can alsos in each indvaluation o

munity ie tudents or rents assocternal evalu

ountries in ools and tea

on of educay ie teacheiteria of thpment of teeir empowatisfied by tstrengtheni

t of teamwking decisio

and operatiction of edupolicy of t

iteria of thndered funcucational legnisational aination and of any formModel of Enclude clearucational l

nding on theaccording th is a cons educationcreate positzational pol

he classroomnal leaders tpacity of teand communThus given teed new stanficial to studo be flexibledividual dirf educationateachers anpupils depiation of pa

uators BesidEurope wi

aching or in

79

ational leadeers and admhe performaachers skil

werment thetheir work ting of thei

work and coons accordiional goals

ucational leathe Ministr

he performactional orggislation wi

and other objd operation om of delinquEducationar objectivesleadership e particular to USA Nsortium of nal leaders tive workinglicies and

m that has a pto build anachers and snity engagemthis growingndards to gudents e and adjustrection or gral leadershind or profending on

arents and tdes accordiithout externdeed any

In

ership can bministrative pance or efflls the creae extent tothe degree or knowledgooperation ing to the respectively

adership canry and the ance or effanizational ith the minijectives setof the schoouency al Leadershs and corres(EKPIS Eeducational

National Poprofessionaduties and

g conditionssystems anpowerful imd strengthestaff the proment and eg knowledguide their pr

table enabliroup of criteip will be abfessors adm

the educatthe structuring to OECrnal assessmother comp

nternational R

e for examppersonnel Ifectiveness tion and cu

o which boof satisfactioge the impbetween thleadership

y n be the impcountry In

fectiveness structure o

mum possib the observol within th

hip Effectivponding cri

Educational l level and tholicy Boardal organizatd actions ins effectivelynd engage

mpact on whn a networkofessional cffective effe and the ch

ractice in dir

ing it to regueria Accordble to includministrative tional levele of the MiD (2011 pment of le

parative me

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

mple the eduIn this direcof the edu

ultivation ofoth academon from theprovement hem the in

style appl

plementation this direcof the eduof the schble deviatio

vance of prohe financial

veness iteria for ev

Key Perfohe specific nd for Edutions commnvolve reley allocate rein other d

hat happens rk of organicommunity ificient manahanging demrections tha

gulate and foding to the de as evalua staff the l the localinistry of Ed 14) Greecearning or echanism of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ucational tion the

ucational f correct

mics and way the of their

ncreased lied the

on of the ction the ucational ool the

ons from cedures budget

valuating ormance needs of

ucational mitted to entlessly esources eep and inside it

izational in which agement

mands of at will be

ormulate above a

ators the student

l school ducation ce is one external

f quality

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

out by tthe direform ofoppositreductioprocessevaluati56) Over threformsoften famajor gobjectivreliableeffectivmeasurilearningnationaOECD In Greesystemshave thStrengthRecentllow in Gschool school accountof respoand deeducatiocooperaconfirmmainly To thisadminisinvited 234 EdAt this leadershlegislatievaluatiincludin

the school hector of eduf the appraision by manons due to ts of school sion process

he past years in educatioailed to makglobal resulves are conce indicatorsveness of Ging the qualg outcomes l assessmen 2017 p 9

ece accordis in Europehe least auhening scholy there havGreece eduleaders in Gself-evalua

tability (OEonsibility asevelopment onal leaderation with

med also by a recipient

s point it istration is sto lead (Muducational Lpoint howehip in Greeion Accordion of the ng the exe

head and reucation and sal report weny teachers athe crisis) Tself-evaluaties includin

rs Greek goon effectiveke a real imlts as far ascerned News are in plGreek educality and effeas there are

nts nor exte 53) ng to OECD

e which funuthority comool leadersh

ve been moducational ouGreece curration shoul

ECD 2017 s key to inc

of teacher itself 3) other schoo Papanaoumand executois worth m

sometimes nulford 2003Leadership ever it is aece is definding to the Pdirectors oercise of a

levant schothe relevanere defined and by teachThe teacherion previou

ng school se

overnmentseness Howe

mpact on thes the perforw laws havlace to proation systemectiveness oe neither external evalua

D (2011 pctions ineffmpared to hip is one odest moves utcomes remrently haveld be reinp 7) The a

creasing theer quality

strategic mols The abm (1995) wor of circulamentioning not due to i3) Evaluation

appropriate tned throughPresidential of school unadministrativ

76

ool advisor rnt educationcentrally Thersrsquo unionrsrsquo unions thusly perceivlf-evaluatio

s have sougever wheree quality andrmance of sve often beeovide inform The sysof the educaternal assesations of sc

p 24) we hafectively Oother coun

of the mosttowards de

main weak e limited resntroduced agencys OE

e effectivene2) objecti

managemenbove claim which statesars and orde

that to a its leaders

to mentionh the perspeDecree (PD

nits is carrve and org

In

respectivelyn advisor ThThis teacher ns (in the cohen reacted

ved in position were lsquofro

ght to addree reforms had efficiencystudents anden enacted brmation onstem cannoation systemssments of lechools and t

ave one of tOne of the antries is in t crucial chacentralizatioand the syssponsibilitietogether w

ECD (2011)ess of the Dives evalunt of financ

on the ces that the ders for all th

large extebut to the v

how the efective by thD 1522013ied out in ganisational

nternational R

y and that ohe criteria appraisal syntext of edu

d against theve terms Aozenrsquo in 201

ss a numbeave been inty of the systd the achievbut not fullyn the qualit rely on c

m and the actearning basteaching (O

the most cereas in whimanaging

allenges foron but whistem is still es and there

with some ) research id

Director 1) ation and cial and huntralized edirector at the main issue

ent the defvery system

ffectivenesshe framewo3 FEK Α 2five categol work wit

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

of a school proceduresystem was mucation expe newly est

All these edu15 (OECD

er of issues troduced thtem and to vement of y implemenity efficienconsistent ttual achievesed on stand

OECD 2011

entralized edich school d

human rer education ile dropout r

highly cenre is consen

form of dentified fosupport evaccountabi

uman resouducation syhe Greek Ses of responficiency in

m in which

s of the eduork of the

24005-11-2ories of parthin the leg

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

head by and the met with enditure ablished

ucational 2017 p

through hey have produce learning nted No ncy and ools for ement of dardized 1 p 14

ducation directors esources

reform rates are

ntralized nsus that external

our areas valuation ility for urces 4) ystem is chool is

nsibility n school they are

ucational relevant 013) the rameters gislative

framewclimate conductAccordprocessits objecperformstandardeffectivfor eachof the sregionaevaluatiand stuintegratevaluatisystem 24 ConSo far iidentifieparametdetermito take that it aand thoeducatioresponsas well defines educatioIn summdirectorthe relework Tand in tof climachievinschool effectivproceduother wshould characte

work the exeand pedag

ting teachiing to Saϊti

s of evaluatinctives and t

mance standds and d) co

veness OECh region to ischool netwal director foion and assudent assesting studention school of assessme

nsiderationsit is understed with sufters and cerining the criinto accoun

affects in ororough as ponal leaderssibilities as as from theclear criter

onal adminimary we crs of school evant legislaThe effectivethe level of

mate and atting the objecleaders and

veness of higures as well

words whenconsider theristics of th

ercise of thegogy of theing and ev (2008 p ng the qualitargets and tdards (b) morrecting de

CD (2011 pimprove the

work to estaor making ssessment frassment balt formative aself evaluatent and evas About Dratood that thefficient objertainly not aiteria for thnt as far as rder procespossible Alship we musthey raised e Greek mairia of effectiistration and

can observeunits has b

ation makeseness also hdevelopmenitudes It isctives that ad their leadgh-level eduas common

n we refer tohis as a dyhe personal

e work of sue school unvaluating s15) the eva

ity of the edthe process

measuring peviations Am 43) recom

e efficiency ablish perfostep-by-stepamework stlancing extassessment tion with a vluation base

awing the Ase effectivenectively to a

a concept whe effectivenpossible obs off assesslso in the st take into afrom both tinly legislativeness whid less as crithat the ev

een done bos it clear thhas to do wint of the hums understoore come witdership stylucation pren acceptableo the concepynamic comity of the le

77

upervision annit planningstudents scaluation of

ducation proof such con

performancemong other

mmended toof the use o

ormance agp progress totudent asseternal and in the evalu

view to desied on resultssessment o

ness of educa large extehich is non-ness of the ebjective andsing leadersh

criticism waccount boththe various tion governich are set miteria evaluavaluation anoth at adminhat the direcith meeting

uman resourd from the th appropriale which isesuppose thee criteria forpt of effectmplex funceader and hi

In

nd evaluatiog organizecientific anthe educativided and thntrol consise (c) compar measures i Greece wa

of human regreements boward agreessment by ateacher-bas

uation and aigning and its and outcoof Educationcational leadent compar-measurableeducationald measurablhip to be as

we can exerh the admindefinitions

ning the opemore as objeation nd assessmenistrative anctor provideobjectives bces of educabove that

ate behavious exercisede existencer assessing thtive educatioction basedis team cult

nternational R

on the evalu and prepa

nd professioonal projecthe degree ofts of four staring the mn order to e

as to set goaesources andetween the ed goals imaligning edused assessmassessment mplementin

omes nal Leadersdership is a rative and me theoretica

administrale criteria os meritocratrt on the e

nistrative sidwe have seration of edectives and

ent of the end teaching es administrboth at the aational unitt effectivenurs particul Maintaininof commonhe quality aonal leaders

d on foundature and ma

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

uation of tharation of teonal devel

ct is the conf implementages a) Se

measuremenenhance eduals and bencd the rationa Ministry a

mplementatiducational stments of lframeworkng a compre

ship Effectivconcept tha

multiple crital and subjeation it is neof all the adtic fair meeffectivenesde off the leaet for the leaducational ucompetence

effectiveneslevel provi

trative and tadministratits and the foness is the rlar characterng the qua

nly acceptedand effectiveship evaluaations suchaturity of th

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

he school eaching lopment ntinuous tation of tting the

nt to the ucational chmarks alization and each on of an tandards learning teacher ehensive

veness at can be teria and ctive In ecessary dressees asurable s of the adership adership

units and es of the

ss of the ided that teaching ive level ormation result of ristics of

ality and d control eness In

ation we h as the

he group

with a sa constr3 Meth31 A SuAssessistakehoaffects into accother pafollowsbe holisand recspecificconcernthe recithereforeach of be muchwill incand shomulti-shoutside multitudThe evadirectioobjectivMore spexamplcriteria performsuch as of rightA seconthe genperformwith thsynergistrengthsuitablewith otprofessi

set specific ructive objehodology uggestion foing the effecolders Whe

then the procount all thearties and ths that a modstic and muipients that

c quantitativning the respipients of thre be differe

f them accorh more effe

clude the criortcomings hareholding

of the edude and divealuation of

on of a sve-directionpecifically e students of the pe

mance of pupanalytical

t attitudes annd goal in a

neral schoolmance or effhe local comes with othehening of re school climther interesional bodies

targets and ectively and

for a Holisticctiveness ofn the evaluocess is incoe addresseeshe respectiv

del of evaluaultifaceted it the educatve and qualipective recihe educatioent as well rding to the rective objecisis concurrof leadersh

g assessmenucational e

ersity of the effectivenepecific obj

n a first goastudent com

erformance pils in the vasynthetic cnd the shapianother direl communityfectiveness ommunity aner schools crelations anmate engagsted schools organizat

the objectivd defined pr

c Educationf educationaation relies omplete uns and does nve objectiveation of the ie to includional leaderitative criteripient and b

onal leadersas the criterespective octive meritently of ma

hip on focunt At the sanvironmentparties and

ess in educajective and

al in a specmmunity In

or effectivarious courscritical thinking of a cultction of eduy In this dof the educand the insticreation of

nd cooperatgement in exs or grouptions

78

ves pursuedrocess

nal Leadersal leadership

only to onenambiguousnot consideres and targeteducationalde to the furship influeria for the ebring about ship are maeria of effecobjectives thtocratic muany differenused issues ame time itt possible i

d evaluation ational leadd subseque

cific directin this directiveness of ses and finaking and abture ucational le

direction theational leadeitutions thea climate of

tion with thxtracurricul

ps such as

In

d respectivel

ship Evaluatp is a procese aspect wh

s and contror the implicts set by thel leadership

ullest extentences and frffectivenesssignificant

any and diffctiveness of hat will putulti-faceted int sides will

and will lim will operatinterventionmembers w

dership is a ent to the

ion of educion the indivthe educati

al exams theility knowl

adership cae individualership can be associatiof cooperatiohe parents lar activitiesthe structu

nternational R

ly in a give

tion Model ss that involhich the eduversial becaations effecem In the li to be fair apossible a

rom each ins of the eduresults to e

ferent fromf the educati Such an evintegrated al highlight smit biased cte in a restrn effort duwhich are ac

function ofe individua

cational leadvidual objecional leadee developmeledge acquis

an be for exl objectivesbe the develon of parenton the visioof pupils ts the netwoures of the

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

en time peri

lves many d

ucational leaause it does cts of leadeight of the aand effectivall interestednterested siducational leaeach of them

m each otherional leader

valuation moand functionspecific weacriticism durictive formue preciselyctively invof the generaal criteria

dership canctives and thership may ent of specifsition deve

xample pars and criterilopment of r

nts networkon of the schthe formati

orking of th local com

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

od with

different adership not take

ership on above it e should d parties de to set adership m Since r it will rship for odel will nal as it aknesses ue to its

m in any y to the

olved al initial of this

n be for herefore

be the fic skills

elopment

ents and ia of the relations king and hool the ion of a e school

mmunity

A third and admindividuleadershattitudeadminisleadershefficienparticipattainmA fourthcurrentindividuleadershapplicatthis theplanninthe limi4 DesigThe prothe effIndicatothis resAdminiadvancidevelopconstrumeaninThis wosupportthey leaand opethe jobthe mosThe evaweightiholistic educatiocommucommuwith intof onlyevaluati

goal in anoministrative ual objectivhip can be

es and behastrative pership is exer

ncy the reipation of th

ment of the ph goal in an regulated ual objectivhip can betion of the ee fulfilment ng organisaitation and egning the Eoposed modfectiveness ors amp Standspectively istration (20ing school p and supporct approprigful work oork requiretsmdashthe profarn and worerations of th educationast productivaluation moiness factorsmodel of e

onal community ie stunity ie parternal or exty a few coion of scho

ther directiocommunity

ves and crithe developaviours thsonnel are sarcised the inforcementhem in takpedagogical nother direceducation

ves and crie the unhinexisting eduof the organ

ation coordielimination Evaluation del should in

of the edudards) depen

Besides a015) whichleadership

rt teachers iate organizoutside of ths education

fessional caprk family anhe school T

al leaders neve and benefdel can alsos in each indvaluation o

munity ie tudents or rents assocternal evalu

ountries in ools and tea

on of educay ie teacheiteria of thpment of teeir empowatisfied by tstrengtheni

t of teamwking decisio

and operatiction of edupolicy of t

iteria of thndered funcucational legnisational aination and of any formModel of Enclude clearucational l

nding on theaccording th is a cons educationcreate positzational pol

he classroomnal leaders tpacity of teand communThus given teed new stanficial to studo be flexibledividual dirf educationateachers anpupils depiation of pa

uators BesidEurope wi

aching or in

79

ational leadeers and admhe performaachers skil

werment thetheir work ting of thei

work and coons accordiional goals

ucational leathe Ministr

he performactional orggislation wi

and other objd operation om of delinquEducationar objectivesleadership e particular to USA Nsortium of nal leaders tive workinglicies and

m that has a pto build anachers and snity engagemthis growingndards to gudents e and adjustrection or gral leadershind or profending on

arents and tdes accordiithout externdeed any

In

ership can bministrative pance or efflls the creae extent tothe degree or knowledgooperation ing to the respectively

adership canry and the ance or effanizational ith the minijectives setof the schoouency al Leadershs and corres(EKPIS Eeducational

National Poprofessionaduties and

g conditionssystems anpowerful imd strengthestaff the proment and eg knowledguide their pr

table enabliroup of criteip will be abfessors adm

the educatthe structuring to OECrnal assessmother comp

nternational R

e for examppersonnel Ifectiveness tion and cu

o which boof satisfactioge the impbetween thleadership

y n be the impcountry In

fectiveness structure o

mum possib the observol within th

hip Effectivponding cri

Educational l level and tholicy Boardal organizatd actions ins effectivelynd engage

mpact on whn a networkofessional cffective effe and the ch

ractice in dir

ing it to regueria Accordble to includministrative tional levele of the MiD (2011 pment of le

parative me

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

mple the eduIn this direcof the edu

ultivation ofoth academon from theprovement hem the in

style appl

plementation this direcof the eduof the schble deviatio

vance of prohe financial

veness iteria for ev

Key Perfohe specific nd for Edutions commnvolve reley allocate rein other d

hat happens rk of organicommunity ificient manahanging demrections tha

gulate and foding to the de as evalua staff the l the localinistry of Ed 14) Greecearning or echanism of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ucational tion the

ucational f correct

mics and way the of their

ncreased lied the

on of the ction the ucational ool the

ons from cedures budget

valuating ormance needs of

ucational mitted to entlessly esources eep and inside it

izational in which agement

mands of at will be

ormulate above a

ators the student

l school ducation ce is one external

f quality

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

framewclimate conductAccordprocessits objecperformstandardeffectivfor eachof the sregionaevaluatiand stuintegratevaluatisystem 24 ConSo far iidentifieparametdetermito take that it aand thoeducatioresponsas well defines educatioIn summdirectorthe relework Tand in tof climachievinschool effectivproceduother wshould characte

work the exeand pedag

ting teachiing to Saϊti

s of evaluatinctives and t

mance standds and d) co

veness OECh region to ischool netwal director foion and assudent assesting studention school of assessme

nsiderationsit is understed with sufters and cerining the criinto accoun

affects in ororough as ponal leaderssibilities as as from theclear criter

onal adminimary we crs of school evant legislaThe effectivethe level of

mate and atting the objecleaders and

veness of higures as well

words whenconsider theristics of th

ercise of thegogy of theing and ev (2008 p ng the qualitargets and tdards (b) morrecting de

CD (2011 pimprove the

work to estaor making ssessment frassment balt formative aself evaluatent and evas About Dratood that thefficient objertainly not aiteria for thnt as far as rder procespossible Alship we musthey raised e Greek mairia of effectiistration and

can observeunits has b

ation makeseness also hdevelopmenitudes It isctives that ad their leadgh-level eduas common

n we refer tohis as a dyhe personal

e work of sue school unvaluating s15) the eva

ity of the edthe process

measuring peviations Am 43) recom

e efficiency ablish perfostep-by-stepamework stlancing extassessment tion with a vluation base

awing the Ase effectivenectively to a

a concept whe effectivenpossible obs off assesslso in the st take into afrom both tinly legislativeness whid less as crithat the ev

een done bos it clear thhas to do wint of the hums understoore come witdership stylucation pren acceptableo the concepynamic comity of the le

77

upervision annit planningstudents scaluation of

ducation proof such con

performancemong other

mmended toof the use o

ormance agp progress totudent asseternal and in the evalu

view to desied on resultssessment o

ness of educa large extehich is non-ness of the ebjective andsing leadersh

criticism waccount boththe various tion governich are set miteria evaluavaluation anoth at adminhat the direcith meeting

uman resourd from the th appropriale which isesuppose thee criteria forpt of effectmplex funceader and hi

In

nd evaluatiog organizecientific anthe educativided and thntrol consise (c) compar measures i Greece wa

of human regreements boward agreessment by ateacher-bas

uation and aigning and its and outcoof Educationcational leadent compar-measurableeducationald measurablhip to be as

we can exerh the admindefinitions

ning the opemore as objeation nd assessmenistrative anctor provideobjectives bces of educabove that

ate behavious exercisede existencer assessing thtive educatioction basedis team cult

nternational R

on the evalu and prepa

nd professioonal projecthe degree ofts of four staring the mn order to e

as to set goaesources andetween the ed goals imaligning edused assessmassessment mplementin

omes nal Leadersdership is a rative and me theoretica

administrale criteria os meritocratrt on the e

nistrative sidwe have seration of edectives and

ent of the end teaching es administrboth at the aational unitt effectivenurs particul Maintaininof commonhe quality aonal leaders

d on foundature and ma

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

uation of tharation of teonal devel

ct is the conf implementages a) Se

measuremenenhance eduals and bencd the rationa Ministry a

mplementatiducational stments of lframeworkng a compre

ship Effectivconcept tha

multiple crital and subjeation it is neof all the adtic fair meeffectivenesde off the leaet for the leaducational ucompetence

effectiveneslevel provi

trative and tadministratits and the foness is the rlar characterng the qua

nly acceptedand effectiveship evaluaations suchaturity of th

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

he school eaching lopment ntinuous tation of tting the

nt to the ucational chmarks alization and each on of an tandards learning teacher ehensive

veness at can be teria and ctive In ecessary dressees asurable s of the adership adership

units and es of the

ss of the ided that teaching ive level ormation result of ristics of

ality and d control eness In

ation we h as the

he group

with a sa constr3 Meth31 A SuAssessistakehoaffects into accother pafollowsbe holisand recspecificconcernthe recithereforeach of be muchwill incand shomulti-shoutside multitudThe evadirectioobjectivMore spexamplcriteria performsuch as of rightA seconthe genperformwith thsynergistrengthsuitablewith otprofessi

set specific ructive objehodology uggestion foing the effecolders Whe

then the procount all thearties and ths that a modstic and muipients that

c quantitativning the respipients of thre be differe

f them accorh more effe

clude the criortcomings hareholding

of the edude and divealuation of

on of a sve-directionpecifically e students of the pe

mance of pupanalytical

t attitudes annd goal in a

neral schoolmance or effhe local comes with othehening of re school climther interesional bodies

targets and ectively and

for a Holisticctiveness ofn the evaluocess is incoe addresseeshe respectiv

del of evaluaultifaceted it the educatve and qualipective recihe educatioent as well rding to the rective objecisis concurrof leadersh

g assessmenucational e

ersity of the effectivenepecific obj

n a first goastudent com

erformance pils in the vasynthetic cnd the shapianother direl communityfectiveness ommunity aner schools crelations anmate engagsted schools organizat

the objectivd defined pr

c Educationf educationaation relies omplete uns and does nve objectiveation of the ie to includional leaderitative criteripient and b

onal leadersas the criterespective octive meritently of ma

hip on focunt At the sanvironmentparties and

ess in educajective and

al in a specmmunity In

or effectivarious courscritical thinking of a cultction of eduy In this dof the educand the insticreation of

nd cooperatgement in exs or grouptions

78

ves pursuedrocess

nal Leadersal leadership

only to onenambiguousnot consideres and targeteducationalde to the furship influeria for the ebring about ship are maeria of effecobjectives thtocratic muany differenused issues ame time itt possible i

d evaluation ational leadd subseque

cific directin this directiveness of ses and finaking and abture ucational le

direction theational leadeitutions thea climate of

tion with thxtracurricul

ps such as

In

d respectivel

ship Evaluatp is a procese aspect wh

s and contror the implicts set by thel leadership

ullest extentences and frffectivenesssignificant

any and diffctiveness of hat will putulti-faceted int sides will

and will lim will operatinterventionmembers w

dership is a ent to the

ion of educion the indivthe educati

al exams theility knowl

adership cae individualership can be associatiof cooperatiohe parents lar activitiesthe structu

nternational R

ly in a give

tion Model ss that involhich the eduversial becaations effecem In the li to be fair apossible a

rom each ins of the eduresults to e

ferent fromf the educati Such an evintegrated al highlight smit biased cte in a restrn effort duwhich are ac

function ofe individua

cational leadvidual objecional leadee developmeledge acquis

an be for exl objectivesbe the develon of parenton the visioof pupils ts the netwoures of the

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

en time peri

lves many d

ucational leaause it does cts of leadeight of the aand effectivall interestednterested siducational leaeach of them

m each otherional leader

valuation moand functionspecific weacriticism durictive formue preciselyctively invof the generaal criteria

dership canctives and thership may ent of specifsition deve

xample pars and criterilopment of r

nts networkon of the schthe formati

orking of th local com

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

od with

different adership not take

ership on above it e should d parties de to set adership m Since r it will rship for odel will nal as it aknesses ue to its

m in any y to the

olved al initial of this

n be for herefore

be the fic skills

elopment

ents and ia of the relations king and hool the ion of a e school

mmunity

A third and admindividuleadershattitudeadminisleadershefficienparticipattainmA fourthcurrentindividuleadershapplicatthis theplanninthe limi4 DesigThe prothe effIndicatothis resAdminiadvancidevelopconstrumeaninThis wosupportthey leaand opethe jobthe mosThe evaweightiholistic educatiocommucommuwith intof onlyevaluati

goal in anoministrative ual objectivhip can be

es and behastrative pership is exer

ncy the reipation of th

ment of the ph goal in an regulated ual objectivhip can betion of the ee fulfilment ng organisaitation and egning the Eoposed modfectiveness ors amp Standspectively istration (20ing school p and supporct approprigful work oork requiretsmdashthe profarn and worerations of th educationast productivaluation moiness factorsmodel of e

onal community ie stunity ie parternal or exty a few coion of scho

ther directiocommunity

ves and crithe developaviours thsonnel are sarcised the inforcementhem in takpedagogical nother direceducation

ves and crie the unhinexisting eduof the organ

ation coordielimination Evaluation del should in

of the edudards) depen

Besides a015) whichleadership

rt teachers iate organizoutside of ths education

fessional caprk family anhe school T

al leaders neve and benefdel can alsos in each indvaluation o

munity ie tudents or rents assocternal evalu

ountries in ools and tea

on of educay ie teacheiteria of thpment of teeir empowatisfied by tstrengtheni

t of teamwking decisio

and operatiction of edupolicy of t

iteria of thndered funcucational legnisational aination and of any formModel of Enclude clearucational l

nding on theaccording th is a cons educationcreate positzational pol

he classroomnal leaders tpacity of teand communThus given teed new stanficial to studo be flexibledividual dirf educationateachers anpupils depiation of pa

uators BesidEurope wi

aching or in

79

ational leadeers and admhe performaachers skil

werment thetheir work ting of thei

work and coons accordiional goals

ucational leathe Ministr

he performactional orggislation wi

and other objd operation om of delinquEducationar objectivesleadership e particular to USA Nsortium of nal leaders tive workinglicies and

m that has a pto build anachers and snity engagemthis growingndards to gudents e and adjustrection or gral leadershind or profending on

arents and tdes accordiithout externdeed any

In

ership can bministrative pance or efflls the creae extent tothe degree or knowledgooperation ing to the respectively

adership canry and the ance or effanizational ith the minijectives setof the schoouency al Leadershs and corres(EKPIS Eeducational

National Poprofessionaduties and

g conditionssystems anpowerful imd strengthestaff the proment and eg knowledguide their pr

table enabliroup of criteip will be abfessors adm

the educatthe structuring to OECrnal assessmother comp

nternational R

e for examppersonnel Ifectiveness tion and cu

o which boof satisfactioge the impbetween thleadership

y n be the impcountry In

fectiveness structure o

mum possib the observol within th

hip Effectivponding cri

Educational l level and tholicy Boardal organizatd actions ins effectivelynd engage

mpact on whn a networkofessional cffective effe and the ch

ractice in dir

ing it to regueria Accordble to includministrative tional levele of the MiD (2011 pment of le

parative me

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

mple the eduIn this direcof the edu

ultivation ofoth academon from theprovement hem the in

style appl

plementation this direcof the eduof the schble deviatio

vance of prohe financial

veness iteria for ev

Key Perfohe specific nd for Edutions commnvolve reley allocate rein other d

hat happens rk of organicommunity ificient manahanging demrections tha

gulate and foding to the de as evalua staff the l the localinistry of Ed 14) Greecearning or echanism of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ucational tion the

ucational f correct

mics and way the of their

ncreased lied the

on of the ction the ucational ool the

ons from cedures budget

valuating ormance needs of

ucational mitted to entlessly esources eep and inside it

izational in which agement

mands of at will be

ormulate above a

ators the student

l school ducation ce is one external

f quality

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

with a sa constr3 Meth31 A SuAssessistakehoaffects into accother pafollowsbe holisand recspecificconcernthe recithereforeach of be muchwill incand shomulti-shoutside multitudThe evadirectioobjectivMore spexamplcriteria performsuch as of rightA seconthe genperformwith thsynergistrengthsuitablewith otprofessi

set specific ructive objehodology uggestion foing the effecolders Whe

then the procount all thearties and ths that a modstic and muipients that

c quantitativning the respipients of thre be differe

f them accorh more effe

clude the criortcomings hareholding

of the edude and divealuation of

on of a sve-directionpecifically e students of the pe

mance of pupanalytical

t attitudes annd goal in a

neral schoolmance or effhe local comes with othehening of re school climther interesional bodies

targets and ectively and

for a Holisticctiveness ofn the evaluocess is incoe addresseeshe respectiv

del of evaluaultifaceted it the educatve and qualipective recihe educatioent as well rding to the rective objecisis concurrof leadersh

g assessmenucational e

ersity of the effectivenepecific obj

n a first goastudent com

erformance pils in the vasynthetic cnd the shapianother direl communityfectiveness ommunity aner schools crelations anmate engagsted schools organizat

the objectivd defined pr

c Educationf educationaation relies omplete uns and does nve objectiveation of the ie to includional leaderitative criteripient and b

onal leadersas the criterespective octive meritently of ma

hip on focunt At the sanvironmentparties and

ess in educajective and

al in a specmmunity In

or effectivarious courscritical thinking of a cultction of eduy In this dof the educand the insticreation of

nd cooperatgement in exs or grouptions

78

ves pursuedrocess

nal Leadersal leadership

only to onenambiguousnot consideres and targeteducationalde to the furship influeria for the ebring about ship are maeria of effecobjectives thtocratic muany differenused issues ame time itt possible i

d evaluation ational leadd subseque

cific directin this directiveness of ses and finaking and abture ucational le

direction theational leadeitutions thea climate of

tion with thxtracurricul

ps such as

In

d respectivel

ship Evaluatp is a procese aspect wh

s and contror the implicts set by thel leadership

ullest extentences and frffectivenesssignificant

any and diffctiveness of hat will putulti-faceted int sides will

and will lim will operatinterventionmembers w

dership is a ent to the

ion of educion the indivthe educati

al exams theility knowl

adership cae individualership can be associatiof cooperatiohe parents lar activitiesthe structu

nternational R

ly in a give

tion Model ss that involhich the eduversial becaations effecem In the li to be fair apossible a

rom each ins of the eduresults to e

ferent fromf the educati Such an evintegrated al highlight smit biased cte in a restrn effort duwhich are ac

function ofe individua

cational leadvidual objecional leadee developmeledge acquis

an be for exl objectivesbe the develon of parenton the visioof pupils ts the netwoures of the

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

en time peri

lves many d

ucational leaause it does cts of leadeight of the aand effectivall interestednterested siducational leaeach of them

m each otherional leader

valuation moand functionspecific weacriticism durictive formue preciselyctively invof the generaal criteria

dership canctives and thership may ent of specifsition deve

xample pars and criterilopment of r

nts networkon of the schthe formati

orking of th local com

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

od with

different adership not take

ership on above it e should d parties de to set adership m Since r it will rship for odel will nal as it aknesses ue to its

m in any y to the

olved al initial of this

n be for herefore

be the fic skills

elopment

ents and ia of the relations king and hool the ion of a e school

mmunity

A third and admindividuleadershattitudeadminisleadershefficienparticipattainmA fourthcurrentindividuleadershapplicatthis theplanninthe limi4 DesigThe prothe effIndicatothis resAdminiadvancidevelopconstrumeaninThis wosupportthey leaand opethe jobthe mosThe evaweightiholistic educatiocommucommuwith intof onlyevaluati

goal in anoministrative ual objectivhip can be

es and behastrative pership is exer

ncy the reipation of th

ment of the ph goal in an regulated ual objectivhip can betion of the ee fulfilment ng organisaitation and egning the Eoposed modfectiveness ors amp Standspectively istration (20ing school p and supporct approprigful work oork requiretsmdashthe profarn and worerations of th educationast productivaluation moiness factorsmodel of e

onal community ie stunity ie parternal or exty a few coion of scho

ther directiocommunity

ves and crithe developaviours thsonnel are sarcised the inforcementhem in takpedagogical nother direceducation

ves and crie the unhinexisting eduof the organ

ation coordielimination Evaluation del should in

of the edudards) depen

Besides a015) whichleadership

rt teachers iate organizoutside of ths education

fessional caprk family anhe school T

al leaders neve and benefdel can alsos in each indvaluation o

munity ie tudents or rents assocternal evalu

ountries in ools and tea

on of educay ie teacheiteria of thpment of teeir empowatisfied by tstrengtheni

t of teamwking decisio

and operatiction of edupolicy of t

iteria of thndered funcucational legnisational aination and of any formModel of Enclude clearucational l

nding on theaccording th is a cons educationcreate positzational pol

he classroomnal leaders tpacity of teand communThus given teed new stanficial to studo be flexibledividual dirf educationateachers anpupils depiation of pa

uators BesidEurope wi

aching or in

79

ational leadeers and admhe performaachers skil

werment thetheir work ting of thei

work and coons accordiional goals

ucational leathe Ministr

he performactional orggislation wi

and other objd operation om of delinquEducationar objectivesleadership e particular to USA Nsortium of nal leaders tive workinglicies and

m that has a pto build anachers and snity engagemthis growingndards to gudents e and adjustrection or gral leadershind or profending on

arents and tdes accordiithout externdeed any

In

ership can bministrative pance or efflls the creae extent tothe degree or knowledgooperation ing to the respectively

adership canry and the ance or effanizational ith the minijectives setof the schoouency al Leadershs and corres(EKPIS Eeducational

National Poprofessionaduties and

g conditionssystems anpowerful imd strengthestaff the proment and eg knowledguide their pr

table enabliroup of criteip will be abfessors adm

the educatthe structuring to OECrnal assessmother comp

nternational R

e for examppersonnel Ifectiveness tion and cu

o which boof satisfactioge the impbetween thleadership

y n be the impcountry In

fectiveness structure o

mum possib the observol within th

hip Effectivponding cri

Educational l level and tholicy Boardal organizatd actions ins effectivelynd engage

mpact on whn a networkofessional cffective effe and the ch

ractice in dir

ing it to regueria Accordble to includministrative tional levele of the MiD (2011 pment of le

parative me

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

mple the eduIn this direcof the edu

ultivation ofoth academon from theprovement hem the in

style appl

plementation this direcof the eduof the schble deviatio

vance of prohe financial

veness iteria for ev

Key Perfohe specific nd for Edutions commnvolve reley allocate rein other d

hat happens rk of organicommunity ificient manahanging demrections tha

gulate and foding to the de as evalua staff the l the localinistry of Ed 14) Greecearning or echanism of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ucational tion the

ucational f correct

mics and way the of their

ncreased lied the

on of the ction the ucational ool the

ons from cedures budget

valuating ormance needs of

ucational mitted to entlessly esources eep and inside it

izational in which agement

mands of at will be

ormulate above a

ators the student

l school ducation ce is one external

f quality

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

A third and admindividuleadershattitudeadminisleadershefficienparticipattainmA fourthcurrentindividuleadershapplicatthis theplanninthe limi4 DesigThe prothe effIndicatothis resAdminiadvancidevelopconstrumeaninThis wosupportthey leaand opethe jobthe mosThe evaweightiholistic educatiocommucommuwith intof onlyevaluati

goal in anoministrative ual objectivhip can be

es and behastrative pership is exer

ncy the reipation of th

ment of the ph goal in an regulated ual objectivhip can betion of the ee fulfilment ng organisaitation and egning the Eoposed modfectiveness ors amp Standspectively istration (20ing school p and supporct approprigful work oork requiretsmdashthe profarn and worerations of th educationast productivaluation moiness factorsmodel of e

onal community ie stunity ie parternal or exty a few coion of scho

ther directiocommunity

ves and crithe developaviours thsonnel are sarcised the inforcementhem in takpedagogical nother direceducation

ves and crie the unhinexisting eduof the organ

ation coordielimination Evaluation del should in

of the edudards) depen

Besides a015) whichleadership

rt teachers iate organizoutside of ths education

fessional caprk family anhe school T

al leaders neve and benefdel can alsos in each indvaluation o

munity ie tudents or rents assocternal evalu

ountries in ools and tea

on of educay ie teacheiteria of thpment of teeir empowatisfied by tstrengtheni

t of teamwking decisio

and operatiction of edupolicy of t

iteria of thndered funcucational legnisational aination and of any formModel of Enclude clearucational l

nding on theaccording th is a cons educationcreate positzational pol

he classroomnal leaders tpacity of teand communThus given teed new stanficial to studo be flexibledividual dirf educationateachers anpupils depiation of pa

uators BesidEurope wi

aching or in

79

ational leadeers and admhe performaachers skil

werment thetheir work ting of thei

work and coons accordiional goals

ucational leathe Ministr

he performactional orggislation wi

and other objd operation om of delinquEducationar objectivesleadership e particular to USA Nsortium of nal leaders tive workinglicies and

m that has a pto build anachers and snity engagemthis growingndards to gudents e and adjustrection or gral leadershind or profending on

arents and tdes accordiithout externdeed any

In

ership can bministrative pance or efflls the creae extent tothe degree or knowledgooperation ing to the respectively

adership canry and the ance or effanizational ith the minijectives setof the schoouency al Leadershs and corres(EKPIS Eeducational

National Poprofessionaduties and

g conditionssystems anpowerful imd strengthestaff the proment and eg knowledguide their pr

table enabliroup of criteip will be abfessors adm

the educatthe structuring to OECrnal assessmother comp

nternational R

e for examppersonnel Ifectiveness tion and cu

o which boof satisfactioge the impbetween thleadership

y n be the impcountry In

fectiveness structure o

mum possib the observol within th

hip Effectivponding cri

Educational l level and tholicy Boardal organizatd actions ins effectivelynd engage

mpact on whn a networkofessional cffective effe and the ch

ractice in dir

ing it to regueria Accordble to includministrative tional levele of the MiD (2011 pment of le

parative me

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

mple the eduIn this direcof the edu

ultivation ofoth academon from theprovement hem the in

style appl

plementation this direcof the eduof the schble deviatio

vance of prohe financial

veness iteria for ev

Key Perfohe specific nd for Edutions commnvolve reley allocate rein other d

hat happens rk of organicommunity ificient manahanging demrections tha

gulate and foding to the de as evalua staff the l the localinistry of Ed 14) Greecearning or echanism of

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ucational tion the

ucational f correct

mics and way the of their

ncreased lied the

on of the ction the ucational ool the

ons from cedures budget

valuating ormance needs of

ucational mitted to entlessly esources eep and inside it

izational in which agement

mands of at will be

ormulate above a

ators the student

l school ducation ce is one external

f quality

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

assurandespite consensbecauseassessmconsensoutcomevaluatiself-assThe pro

Accordthe findNationaevaluatiand mayof effecThe sughave beand hasthroughto be aConcurreducatioThus w

nce except fothe fact th

sus in Greee it is believ

ment (IEP 2sus on natio

mes framewoion model

sessment prooposed ratin

ing to the adings and sual Policy Boion framewy include anctiveness usggested modeen selecteds three evahout this speable to asserently this onal leaderwhen teach

or its particihat the procce that it shved that ca016) The a

onal standardork for all s

should alsocess and a

ng agencies

above mentiuggestions ooard for Edork should tn external evsing relativedel is compld from the daluation parecific questiess educatio

questionna provided thers stude

ipation in Pcess of schhould be re

an help to leavailability ods for differschools shoso include also includeare reflecte

Figure 1 T

ioned the pof (OECD 2ducational Atake into accvaluator Th

e criteria forlemented addepartment orts for teachionnaire eaconal leaderaire can bethat the saments paren

80

PISA and unhool self-eve-introducedead to a chof better datrent educatiould help tthe educat

e an externaed in the Fig

The evaluat

proposed ev2011 OECDAdministraticount the tohus the mor each stakedditionally wof quality ahers studench stake holdrship based e used and

me content nts or min

In

niversity entvaluation wd as it coulhange of attta on studenonal levelso facilitate ional leade

al certifiedgure 1 below

tion model

valuation moD 2017 IEPion 2015)

otal share hodel has form

e holder as wwith relativeassurance ofnts and parder as a reci

on its owd work asis adapted t

nistry asses

nternational R

trance examwas frozen i

d be a gooditudes towa

nt learning o as well as areintroduct

er itself as independenw

odel was deP 2016 WO

According olders of edumulated withwell for the e specific quf Malta Minrents respecipient of edu

wn relative self-evalu

to the leades the educ

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

minations Hin 2015 thd practice ards evaluatoutcomes ala school quation Theref an assesso

ent evaluatio

esigned basORLD BAN

to these stuucational leath specific m

educationauestionnairenistry of Edctively Theucational leasignificant

uation tool er as self-evcational lea

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

However here is a but also tion and longside ality and fore the or in as on body

ically in NK 2017

udies an adership

measures al leader e which

ducation e aim is adership criteria for the

valuator adership

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

effectivaccuratecriteriameasurathe issuThe evamodel timportaagainst have a seach difleadershrepresenobjectivbetweenclimate of job mThe evaspeciallclear madequatwill be objectivproposeto six tocommue) The eindepen

veness towae and fair Thereforeable showin

ues to be addaluation mothere is also ance that eathe objectiv

specific weifferent educhip may be nt respectivves and then primary and some d

market absoaluation mely designedmeasurable tely definedspecific to

ves and goaed model ofotal evaluat

unity c) the educational ndent body e

ards particulthe educatie the comng the relatidressed hanodel with ththe provisio

ach interestve that servighting factocational tierto a certain

vely the releerefore the secondary

different as orption betwethod may bd for each in

quantitativd reports and

each educals that the e

f evaluation tors a) the aenlarged scleadership evaluator (T

lar objectiveional leader

mparison wive deviationdled and whe indicativon for the ded party att

ves this criteor to be counr the criterin extent comvant generacriteria for and higher it is the diff

ween pupils be annual annterested sidve and quad examples ational tier ducational lof the effec

academic techool commitself with thTable 1)

81

es and certars to evalu

will be objons among twhich need ive criteria idifferent weitaches to therion In ot

unted in the oia for evalummon but al and specif

evaluatingeducation

ferent expecand graduatnd shall takde and for alitative pefor each onand each inleadership sctiveness ofeachers and

munity d) thhe self-asse

In

ain criteria-ate themseljectively athe ratters dimprovemenis reflected ighting of eahe criterionther words overall outc

uating the efin some cafic objective the educatshould be

cted educatites respectiv

ke advantageach educa

erformance ne The critenterested sidshould achief the educatid administrahe state throuessment proc

nternational R

-standards tlves againstaccountabledisagreemennt in the Tab

ach criterionof effectiv

each assesscome of the ffectivenessses should es of this tietional leadesome commonal outcomvely e of a structional tier objectives

eria for assede accordineve for themional leadertive staff bugh the Mincess and f) a

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

then it comst the same e comparabnts among th

ble 1 belown on the bas

veness that sment criterevaluation s of the edube differen

er For examership effecmon as it ismes-effects

ctured questand shouldand criter

essing effecng to the p

m Summarirship can incb) the pupilnistry of Edan external

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

mes easy exactly

ble and hem and

w In this sis of the it raises

rion will Also in

ucational nt as will mple the ctiveness s school in terms

tionnaire d contain ria with ctiveness articular izing the clude up student

ducation certified

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

Table 1

Evaluators

Members

Student Pupil

Graduates

Community

Educational

Teachers

Community

amp

Administrative

Staff

A holistic

Strategic

Objectives

s

Learning

Teaching

Outcomes

Students

Performan

and

achieveme

e

Leadership

Manageme

Style

Outcomes

Profession

developme

Integration

academic

administra

personnel

educational

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

amp

nce

ents

Safe

access

people

diversi

resourc

Studen

develo

Forma

behavi

gradua

Perform

for ex

Excell

day

phenom

p amp

ent

nal

ent

n of

and

ative

Missio

Ethics

Profes

and

Develo

Opport

Effecti

Integri

equal

Influen

manag

Stimul

Empat

Teamw

l leadership

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

and functi

ibility and supp

e with disabili

ity Utilizatio

ces Distinction

nt perform

opment Knowl

tion of attitu

iors Degree o

ates in the

mance of excel

xaminations

ence Preparat

Elimination

mena

on Vision an

and Profe

sional Commu

Staff Work

opment of

tunities for tr

ive leadership

ity Responsive

treatment

nce Persuasio

gement Suppo

lation Prob

thy Encourage

work amp collabor

82

p evaluation

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

ional faciliti

port structures

ities Respect

on of availa

ns and excellen

mance Sk

ledge acquisiti

udes perceptio

of absorption

labour mark

llence preparat

Distinctions a

tion for the n

of delinqu

nd Core Valu

essional Norm

unity for Teach

king conditio

f executiv

raining Initiati

skills and sty

eness Fairness

Meritocra

on Participat

ortive leadersh

blem solvi

ement Guidan

ration

In

n model

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ies

for

for

able

nce

kills

ion

ons

of

ket

tion

and

next

uent

1-5

ues

ms

hers

ons

ves

ive

yle

s amp

acy

ory

hip

ing

nce

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pu

Gr

Qu

Te

Sa

Su

Qu

Ad

Pe

Sa

Su

Qu

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

upil-Student

raduates

uestionnaire

eachersrsquo

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

dministrative

rsonnel

tisfaction

urvey

uestionnaire

n

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

Evaluators

Members

Broader Schoo

Local

Community amp

Parents

Ministry

of Education

Strategic

Objectives

ol

amp

School Cl

outcomes

Diverse

perspective

School

Communit

Relations

Operationa

Outcomes

Educationa

level g

Schools

standards

assessmen

School

improveme

Organizati

Resources

School

Policies

Distinction

Excellence

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Individ

criteria

imate

esrsquo

ty

Equity

Comm

Studen

Famili

inform

parents

with d

Pleasan

extrov

Develo

networ

amp loc

environ

Specia

al

al

goals

and

nts

ent

ion

and

ns amp

e

Curricu

Assess

School

Improv

Manag

utilizat

of lost

Partici

confer

progra

Utiliza

Implem

framew

proced

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary H

dual indicator

a-measures by e

y and Cultural

munity of Care

nts Meaningfu

es and Com

mation and co

s Support stru

disabilities Resp

nt School clim

ersion amp

opment of c

rking relations w

cal communit

nment Person

al case managem

ulum Inst

sment Professi

l Personn

vement Op

gement Deg

tion Efficiency

t hours Scient

pation in

ences Particip

ammes To

ation of

mentation

work amp Gov

dures

83

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

Higher Educati

rs and effica

educational leve

l Responsivene

and Support

ul Engagement

mmunity regu

ommunication

uctures for peo

pect for divers

mate- Degree

innovati

cooperative a

with other scho

ty Safe sch

nal interest a

ment

truction a

ional Capacity

nel Sch

perations a

gree of I

y Replenishm

ntific publicatio

internatio

pation in resea

otal citatio

infrastructur

of legislat

vernment Pol

In

a of

on

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ess

for

of

ular

of

ople

ity

of

ion

and

ools

hool

and

1-5

and

of

hool

and

CT

ment

ons

onal

arch

ons

res

tive

licy

1-5

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Pa

Sa

Qu

Ta

Ac

Ap

As

the

ach

Me

Sta

Ob

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

rents

tisfaction

uestionnaire

arget

chievement

ppraisal

ssessing

e degree of

hievement

eeting

andards amp

bjectives

n

f

amp

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

Evaluators

Members

External

Independent

Certified

Evaluator

Self-Evaluatin

Educational

Leadership

FINALE

EVALUATIO

N= TOTAL

OF STAKE

HOLDERS

Total eachieve Each grthem a significcriterionoverall results multiplithe impinteractto institleadershenvironwellbein5 Conc

The effecommu

Strategic

Objectives

Overall a

criteria

compariso

with Me

Standards

Best Practi

ng Overall A

Criteria

O

E

evaluation= ement)

roup of evaweighting

cance of thisn on a Likeperformanfrom the pied by the rportance oftion betweentute any eduhip skills

nment and ng (Gjoshi clusions

fectiveness ounity of educ

s

Profes

Effect

Primar

Higher

Individ

criteria

above

plus

ns

eeting

amp

ices

Compa

of oth

institut

Above Self-as

leader

evalua

Total

evalua

educat

Sum of

aluators sidefactor of 1

s criterion fert Scale froce and degartial sum relevant wef managerian teachers p

ucational refwhich alsoquality of

amp Kume 2

of leadershipcators resea

ssional Standar

iveness Educa

ry Secondary

r Education

dual indicator

a-measures by e

arative perform

her similar e

tions different

ssessment of

in each of th

ation

of selected

ation group an

tion

selected

e selects th1= minimumfor that grou

om 1 = zero gree of evaof the degrighting of tal capacitiepupils pareform and also impact tf learning 014)

p in the eduarchers pare

84

rds amp Criteria

ation Level

rs and effica

educational leve

mance and resu

educational un

states ie PISA

the educatio

he criteria set

d set criteria

nd per level

criteria X

he most repum up to 5up and assachieveme

aluation effree which athat criteriones of schooents and locaso studentsrsquothe self-effaccording

ucation sectoents studen

In

a of

acy

el

Weightin

Coefficie

Criterion

ults

nits

1-5

onal

for

1-5

per

of

1-5

1-5 (weig

resentative 5 = maximusesses the deent up to 5 =fectiveness attributed ton Besides ol leaders ial governme success is l

ficacy of tto their r

or is an issunts educatio

nternational R

ness

ent

n

Achie

Grad

Crite

1-5

1-5

Total

Achie

htiness fac

criteria for um weightegree of ach= maximumof the eduo each of taccording t

in leading ent is valuedlinked with eachers Furesearch in

ue that increaon in genera

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

evement

de

erion

De

the

me

Be

Int

Sta

Eff

Be

Se

Qu

Final

evement

Th

ass

sum

eva

ctor) X 1-5

r this gives dependinghievement

m achievemucational leathe criteria to another sschool effed as crucial the effectivurthermorenfluences s

asingly engal and many

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

escription of

e evaluation

ethod

enchmarking

ternational

andards of

ffectiveness amp

est Practices

lf Evaluation

uestionnaire

he overall

sessment is the

m of all

aluations

5 (grade

each of g on the for each

ment The adership adopted

study on ectively in order

veness of school studentsrsquo

gages the y studies

n

f

amp

n

l

e

l

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

have beAydin eto contreffectivobjectivwhich eWith reand arisof the ethese arand the Regardiof the measuraand meaAs for trelevantcredibleand muRegardiemergeand assemore acjudged and targthe objethey cadifferen51 PoliAccorda meanschallengframewassessmassessmimprovesystemassessmclassroocomponlevels (goals of

een done on et al 2013 ribute to the

veness Empve and qualientails all thegard to the ses through effectivenesre the acadeeducationa

ing the secorelevant litable with obasures accothe third rest literature e put with

ulti-factorialing the concd in principess the effecccountable objectively

gets which aectives At tan be manynt recipientsicy Recomming to OECs to assess sges in devel

work such aments and tments basede the provis Thus OEC

ments that com the schnents and is (teacher schf reform an

the issue ofThompson e commentphasis was pitative criter

he major staresearch quthe quotati

ss of the eduemic and adal policy thrond researchterature thabjective and

ording to theearch questthat the cr

quantifiablel based on thcept of effe

ple in determctiveness ofway the ef

y on the basiare initially this point it different s mendations aD a key elemstudent learloping an efs aligning eteacher-based on results sion of educCD recommcan be usedool the rega requiremhool admin

nd for establ

f its effect on2017 Allenary and meplaced on thria of educa

ake holdersrsquouestions andon of the reucational ledministrativow the minih question at indeed thd clear critee interest of tion it is undriteria for ee qualitativhe main recectiveness omining the cf leadershipffectivenessis of the reshave been sis understooquantitative

and Researcment of an erning outcomffective studeducational ed assessmand outcom

cation and tmends that Gd as appropgion and theent not onlynistration) blishing a reg

85

n the varioun Grigsby aeanings of the correlatiational lead interests

d more specelevant litereadership arve staff off istry of eduit is unders

he outcomeeria and thef each stake derstood andevaluation cve and quancipients of thof educationconcept of p with specifs of an educsults producset The critod that the oe and qualit

rch Contribuevaluation smes throughdent assessmstandards a

ments of leames (more to promote aGreece neepriate at me system Ay for the devbut also forgime of acc

In

us addresseeand Peters 2the conceptsion interactership effec

cifically to thrature that thre the main school orga

ucation stood and pees of the ese can be seholder

d documentcan identifi

ntitative manhe education

nal leadershieffectivenefic criteria cational leadced as compterion here iobjectives atative depen

ution system whih a nationalment withinand student aarning and than on inpaccountabilds to design

multiple leveA comprehenvelopment or measuringcountability

nternational R

es of this (M2015) This s of school tion and intctiveness in

he first queshe most apprecipients t

anization th

erceived threducational et by differe

ed through ied with relnner and evnal leadership importanss and alsoparametersdership canpared to theis the degreeare not alwanding on di

ch is now m student ass

n the evaluatassessmentintegrating

put and proity across thn a nationalels the indinsive systemof improvemg the succesy Evaluation

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

McCarty et awork has atleadership

tegration ofn a functiona

stion is undpropriate evthat this imphe students

rough the qleadership

ent goals st

the quotatiolative accur

valuated objhip nt conclusio

o in how to m Eventually

n be interpree objectivese of achieve

ays the sameifferent inte

missing in Gsessment Ttion and ass balancing g student-foocedure) in he whole ed

al system ofividual studm involves mment strategss in achievns and asse

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

al 2014 ttempted and itsrsquo

f relative al model

derstood valuators pact and parents

quotation can be

tandards

on of the racy be jectively

ons have measure y with a eted and criteria ement of e in fact erests of

Greece is There are sessment external

ormative order to ducation f student dent the multiple

gies at all ving the essments

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

are requdecentrBesidesintentiofor estaattemptthe pedaThis stuPolicy teachersleadershoutcomleaders results teachersparents provideanticipaLeadersresults current differenfairnesscompar52 FurFurther relevantto be asfollowestudy shsimilar of impoadopt theducatiosociety howevemeritocshould educatio

uirements falisation as a self-evaon off reformablishing a ted for the fagogical au

udy could co(IEP) Mins and schohip and the

mes The sugand adminThese are

srsquo performaand overal

e concurrenated targets s will becomto upliftingchanges of

nt evaluatorss and focurable sufficirther Resear

studies sht assessmen

s objective aed on the dehould undemodel in o

ortance of suhe importanonal leaderswith critica

er this shoulcracy and t

lead to donal policy

for an equitand for devaluation frams of Greek

frameworkfirst time wutonomy of ontribute to

nistry of Edool leaders significant

ggested intenistrators toe for examance persol school op

ntly clear and standar

me aware tog and improf the times s integratedus on speient standardrch

hould be carnt criteria foand mainly megree of accergo to checother wordsuch an evalunce of evaluaship in part

al direct andld not deviattransparenc

directions aoutcomes

table regimvolution of amework fok educationak for evaluill contributschools (HeGreek auth

ducation in in better role of an

egrated evao learn the

mple studennnel satisfaerational peinformatio

rds that havo cope withoving schoolthrough thi

d in the modecific areasds

rried out inor each intermore represceptance ofck the desir the same duation modeating the effticular as thlong-term r

te from its fucy and throand opportu

86

me of accounf autonomyor the educal system in uating educte to the decellenic Repu

horities for etheir effor

understandiintegrated e

aluation moway that thntsrsquo achievaction relaerformancen regardin

ve been set rh the challenl effectivenis contributiel can estab

s for leade

n order to rested side osentative as f this modelrability and direct recipieel of the edufectiveness hey have a mresults Whi

fundamentalough the emunities for

In

ntability ef to individcational ouwhich the s

cational stafcentralizatioublic 2018education surts for reforing the exievaluation model may heheir leaders

vement schtions with The propo

ng leadershrelatively frnges of the

ness to be cion The mu

blish its tranership effec

finalise theof evaluator

possible Itl for each elevel of us

ents as evaluucational leaof the educmulti-faceteichever assel objectives

mergence ofthe impro

nternational R

fficient mandual schooltcomes of scheme propff executiveon of the ed p 63) uch as Institrms and assisting effecmodel in imelp head teahip affects

hool climateteachers a

osed model ip effectiverom the difftime with ompetitive ultiple assesparency sactiveness im

e exclusive s in order tht is also impeducation tisefulness ofuators shouadership Poation systemed influenceessment mo which musf weakness

ovement an

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

nagement els (OECD each schoo

poses species These r

ducation sys

tute for Edusist policy

ctiveness ofmproving leaachers eduschool com

e learning administrativ

is unique aeness towaferent stake regards to and adoptiv

essment critafeguard evimprovemen

objectives he evaluatioportant a stuier Finally f adopting tuld judge tholicy makerm in generale on a large

odel will be ast be the objses that wilnd optimiza

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

effective 2011a)

ol is an fic ways reforms stem and

ucational makers

f school adership

ucational mmunity

results ve staff as it can ards the holders improve ve to the teria and valuation nt with

and the on model udy to be

another this or a e degree

rs should l and the e part of adopted ectivity ll result ation of

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

Referen

Allen RelationNCPEAAvci Aprincipa10(20) Ayhan Styles oTheory Beck LexplorinEducatiBird Jleadersh153-171Bruggenschool Educati436272CatanoBetweehttpsdCliffordClimatePubliclye57217Cohen policy DruckerReviewInvestigevaluati10(20) Edmond15-18 2ElmoreEverardOpen U

nces

N Grigsbnship Amon

A InternatioA (2015) Inals and eva2758-2767A YIlma

on Teachersamp Practice

L G amp Fong possibilional Admin Wang Chip and tea1 httpsdoncate G Lleaders on

ional Admin2 N amp Str

en Principaldoiorg101d Μ Menoe for Gaugiy Accessib2012-001 J McCabepractice anr P F (2

wrsquoden en kagation of traion of them2758-2767

ds R (19720-24 R F (200

d K B ampUniversity)

by B amp ng Transfornal Journal

nvestigationaluation of t7 httpsdoiaz S amp Şesrsquo Organizae 13(2) 806oster W (1ities In J nistration (p Watson Jacher trust oiorg1011Luyten H n student nistration Q

ronge J Hl Evaluation117701926on R Ganing Princip

ble Measure

e EM Mind teacher e2012) Kenlıcı youmlnetimansformatio

m in terms of7 httpsdoi79) Effectiv

02) Bridginamp Morris G

Patra (in Gr

Peters L mational Lel of Educati

n of transformhem in termiorg10589enguumll U (2tional Com

6-811 1999) Adm

Murphy amppp 337-358 amp Murrayand engage771052684Scheerens achievemen

Quarterly 4

H (2006) Wn and Perfo365062922

ngi T Conpal Performes America

ichelli M Nducation T

ndini youmlnetm fikirleri İonal and tranf educationaiorg10589ve Schools

g the Gap BG (1999) E

reek)

87

(2015) Deadership Sional Leademational an

ms of educat97err201522013) The

mmitment an

ministration amp K S L8) San Frany L (2009)ement level4609019002J amp Sleeg

nt How c48(4) 699-7

What Are Pormance Sta211 ndon C amp

mance A Rean Institute

N amp PickeTeachers Cotmek (Ccedilevİstanbul Onsactional lal administra97ERR201for the Urb

Between StaEfficient Ed

In

Does leaderSchool Climership Prepand transactiotional admi2483 Effect of S

nd Job Satis

and commuLouis (Edsncisco Josse Relationshls Journal 202 gers P (201can school 732 https

Principals Eandards NA

amp Hornung eview of thes for Rese

eral T (200ollege Recor İnan M)

Optimist Yayleadership sation Educ52483

ban Poor E

andards andducational A

nternational R

rship mattemate and Stuaration 10(onal leadersnistration A

School Prinfaction Ed

unity Cons) Handbooey-Bass hips among of School

12) Modelileaders m

doiorg10

Expected toASSP Bullet

K (2012) he Validity earch https

09) School rd 111(1) 1) Esaslar yınlar In Astyles of schational Res

Educational

d AchievemeAdministrati

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

er Examinudent Achie(2) ship styles oAcademic J

ncipalsrsquo Leaducational S

sidering chaok of Rese

g principal aLeadership

ing the influmake a diff011770013

o Do Contin 90(3) 2

Measuringand Reliab

sdoiorg1

l climate R180-213

Harvard BAhmet Avcihool principsearch and R

Leadership

ent ion EAP (H

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

ning the evement

of school Journals

adership Sciences

allenges arch on

authentic p 19(2)

uence of fference 161X11

ngruence 221-237

g School bility of 101037

Research

Business i (2015) pals and Reviews

p 37(1)

Hellenic

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

Gjoshi in the imof ReseaHallingreview httpsdHelleniHenderfamily EducatiIEP (InacademLeithwoPhiladeLeithwoPress Leithwostudent EducatiLewis centuryMacbeaMalta MMarzanResearcDevelopMcCartSchoolsAdminisMulfordEffectivfor the AhttpsdNationaEducatiOECD OECD TraininOECD Reform

R amp Kummplementatarch and D

ger P amp Hof empiricadoiorg101c Republic son A T

and comional Develnstitute of E

mic experts food K A

elphia PA Lood K (200

ood K Lolearning r

ional ImproP S Good

y New Yorkath J (2001Ministry of Eno R J Wch to Respment ty D Walls Principal stration andd B (2003veness A PaActivity ldquoAdoiorg101al Policy Bional Leade (2017) Ed (2008) Img Policy Di (2011) Eers in Educ

me K (2014tion of educ

DevelopmentHeck R (19al research 117700131(2018) Greamp Mapp K

mmunity coopment Lab

Educational for the OEC amp Riehl Laboratory 02) Organi

ouis S Andreview of rvement Undman S Hk USA We1) Self-asseEducation

Waters T ampsults Alexa

lin P amp Band Couns

d Supervisio3) School Laper CommAttracting D1076lpos2

Board for Eers 2015 Reducation Polmproving Sivision

Education Pcation OEC

) Research ational instit 1(1) 26-3996) Reasse

1980-199561X960320eece A GroK L (2002

onnections boratory Policy) (20

CD review teC (2003)for Studentizational lea

derson S ampresearch Mniversity of amp Fandt est Publishinessment at sQuality Ass

amp McNultyandria VA

Boggan Mselor Collabon Journal Leaders C

missioned byDeveloping 21091554

Educational eston VA Alicy in GreeSchool Lea

Policy AdviCD Publishin

88

h on the admitutions refo

30 essing the p Education001002 owth Strateg2) A new won studen

16) Experteam MarchWhat we k

t Success Tarning and

amp WahlstroMinneapolis

MinnesotaP M (199

ng school Utopsurance B A (200A Associa

(2014) Shborative Lea32(4)

Changing Roy the Educatand Retaini

46 Administra

Author ece A Prelimadership D

ice for Greng

In

ministrator prorms in Kos

principalrsquos rnal Adminis

gy for the Fwave of ev

nt achievem

srsquo Reports h 2016 know about Temple Univ

school impr

om K (200 MN Cent

95) Manag

pia and deed

05) School ation for S

hared Leadeadership N

oles and Imtion and Traing Effectiv

ation (2015

minary Assirectorate F

eece Strong

nternational R

rofessional sovo Interd

role in schotration Qua

Future idence The

ment Austin

report prepa

successful versity rovement G

04) How leater for App

gement Cha

d Athens E

LeadershipSupervision

ership ModeNational For

mpact on Teaining Policve Teachersrdquo

5) Professi

essment For Educati

g Performe

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

training anddisciplinary

ool effectivearterly 32(1

e impact ofn TX So

ared by the

school lea

Greenwich

adership inplied Resea

allenges in

Ellinika Gra

p that Workn and Cur

del for 21st rum of Edu

Teacher andcy Divisionrdquo Paris Apr

ional Stand

ion Educat

ers and Su

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

d its role Journal

eness A 1) 5-44

f school outhwest

IEP and

adership

CT JAI

fluences arch and

the 21st

ammata

ks From rriculum

Century cational

d School OECD ril 2003

dards for

tion and

uccessful

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

OECD assessm178797PapanaoinvestigPont BpracticePortin BT (20WashinRobinsoAn anaQuarterSaϊti AAthens-SchoderHarcourStravakempiricThe CoDevelopThe WoStrategiThompsLeadersParadigVerdis the Uni

Glossar

IEP Inst

PD Pres

OECD

EKPIS

(2013) Synment OECD7892641906oum Z (

gation ThesB Nusche e (Vol 1) PB S Knap009) Leadngton on V Lloyalysis of thrly 44(5) 6A (2008)-ASPETE rbek P Prt Brace Jov

kou P (20cal researchommonwealpment Grouorld Bank (ies that Worson Canuteship Approagms for the 2

A (2002) versity of L

ry

titute of Edu

sidential De

Organizatio

Educationa

nergies for BD reviews 658-sum-de1995) Thessaloniki K

D amp MoParis OECDpp M S Dadership for

yd C amp Rhe differen635-674 htt) Educatio Cosier Rvanovich Pu03) The d

h Thessalonlth Secretarup Marlboro(2017) Edurk e Sylvesterach and Per21st CenturSchool Eff

London Inst

ucational P

egree

on for Econ

al Key Perfo

Better Learof evaluatio

e e school ad

Kyriakidesoorman HD areff S Fe

Learning

Rowe K (20ntial effectstpsdoiorgonal evalua

R A amp Apublishers

director of niki Kyriakriat Reportough Houseucation Glob

r Dr (2017rspectives ory Journal ofectiveness atitute of Edu

olicy

omic Coope

ormance Ind

89

rning An Inon and ass

dministratio

(2008) Im

eldman S RImprovem

008) The ims of leaderg1011770ation Nati

plin J C

the Primarkidi Brothert (1993) Ee Pall Mall bal Practice

7) Teacherson the Princof Organizaand Educatucation Un

eration and

dicators and

In

nternationalsessment in

on Theore

mproving s

Russell F Ament in Ur

mpact of lership types013161X08ional and

(1988) Ma

ry school us

Education PLondon Building C

srsquo Expectatcipalship Iational amp Eional Evalu

nited Kingdo

Developme

d Standards

nternational R

l perspectiven education

tical analy

chool leade

A Samuelsrban Schoo

adership on Education8321509

Kapodistri

anagement

unit as its

Programme

Capacity of

tions of Eddentifying C

Educational uation in Grom

ent

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

e on evalua httpsdoi

ysis and em

dership Pol

son C amp Lols Univer

n student ounal Admini

ian Univer

San Diego

operating f

Human R

f School Lea

ducational LCritical LeaLeadership

reece PhD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

tion and iorg10

mpirical

licy and

Ling Yeh rsity of

utcomes istration

rsity of

o USA

force-an

Resource

aders

Leadersrsquo adership

p 2(2) thesis at

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

Append

Append

httpseMPROV

Append

Educationa

1 The

2 The

and

3 The

4 I ha

5 The

prac

6 The

feed

7 The

plan

8 The

reco

9 The

bein

10 I fee

11 The

indi

12 The

way

13 The

Plan

14 I am

Dev

15 Pers

actio

dix

dix 1 Evalu

educationgVEMENT3

dix I Teache

al Leadership a

e Head of Schoo

e Head of Schoo

challenges of t

e Senior Manag

ave the opportun

e Senior Man

ctices among st

e Senior Mana

dback on my pe

e Senior Manag

n in advance

e Senior Mana

ords of assessm

e Senior Manag

ng

el involved in th

e school uses th

icate priority ar

e School Develo

y forward for th

e implementati

nrsquos action plans

m involved in

velopment Plan

sons responsib

on plans

uation Quest

ovmtened320Appe

er Question

and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ol consults the

the school

ement Team pr

nity to take lead

nagement Tea

aff

agement Team

erformance in c

gement Team e

agement Team

ment

gement Team c

he schoolrsquos self

he self-evaluati

eas for improve

opment Plan do

he school comm

ion of the S

s is manageable

the implemen

rsquos action plans

ble monitor the

tionnaire

ducationquaendices20

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

staff about the

omotes teamwo

dership roles

am promotes

gives me eff

lass

ensures that te

m monitors tea

cares about my

f-evaluation pro

on process to c

ement

ocument indicat

munity

School Develo

tation of the S

e implementati

90

ality-assura-20questi

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

hool SA

needs SA

ork SA

SA

good SA

ffective SA

eachers SA

achersrsquo SA

y well SA

ocess SA

clearly SA

tes the SA

opment SA

School SA

ion of SA

In

anceDocumionnairesdo

gy

g

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

mentsQADocx

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

20SCHOO

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

OL20I

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

16 I fee

17 I ha

the

18 The

effe

19 Exis

20 The

are

21 New

indu

22 Prof

of th

Learning an

23 The sc

Nation

a L

b D

c L

d E

e E

innova

f E

24 The sc

potenti

25 The sc

26 The s

activiti

27 The sc

28 Collea

29 I feel

el supported in

ave sufficient o

Senior Manage

e Senior Ma

ectively with the

sting school po

e roles and duti

clearly defined

w members of

uction process

fessional Deve

he staff in line w

nd Teaching

chool caters for

nal Curriculum F

Literacy

Digital literacy

Learning to lear

Education for su

Education for

ation

Education for d

chool supports

ial as lifelong le

hool helps learn

school enhanc

ies

hool has links w

agues willingly

confident in im

my role as a tea

opportunities to

ement Team

anagement Te

e teaching staff

licies are effect

es of the differ

f staff benefit

lopment sessio

with the school

r these cross-cu

Framework

rn and cooperat

ustainable deve

entrepreneurs

iversity

s learners in d

earners

ners develop as

es learning th

with the commu

share their reso

mplementing d

acher

o communicate

eam commun

f

tive

rent members o

t from an eff

ns address the

development n

rricular themes

tive learning

elopment

ship creativity

developing the

s democratic cit

hrough co-cur

unity

ources with me

differentiated te

91

SA

e with SA

nicates SA

SA

of staff SA

ffective SA

needs

needsSA

St

rong

lyA

gree

s of the

SA

SA

SA

SA

y and SA

SA

eir full SA

tizens SA

rricular SA

SA

SA

eaching SA

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

St

rong

ly A

gree

Agr

ee

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Not

Sur

e

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

gy

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

method

30 Learne

31 Learne

32 Learne

33 LSAs

learner

34 The sc

35 Our le

scripts

36 The sc

mean m

37

I am

annual

consid

School Clim

38 The sc

39 The sc

a G

b L

c L

d L

40 The sc

41 Resour

42 The sc

guidan

43 Individ

statem

44 The sc

good b

45 The sc

ds

ers participate a

ers participate in

ers are capable o

and teachers w

rs

hool has an app

arners benefit f

chool sets real

marks to raise p

satisfied with

l examinatio

deration our part

mate

hool promotes

hool addresses

Gifted and talen

Learners with sp

Learner from dis

Learners from d

hool has approp

rces are fairly d

chool provides

nce

dual education

ent of needs are

choolrsquos behavio

behaviour

hool handles di

actively in the le

n child-centred

of self-assessm

work in synergy

propriate assess

from the analy

listic targets b

performance

the performan

onsSEC exa

ticular context

confidence and

the needs of

nted learners

pecial education

sadvantaged so

diverse cultural

priate resources

distributed amon

s learners wit

nal programme

e updated regul

our managemen

isciplinary prob

esson

learning

ment

y for the benefi

sment policy

sis of corrected

ased on the n

nce of our sch

ams taking

d self-esteem of

nal needs

cial background

and linguistic b

s to support all

ngst staff

h effective pe

es (IEPs) for

larly

nt policy is effe

blems in a firm

92

SA

SA

SA

it of all SA

SA

d exam SA

national SA

hool in

into SA

f learners

nds

backgrounds

learners

ersonal and ca

r learners wit

ective in promo

but caring man

In

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A St

rong

ly A

gree

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

areer SA A

th a SA A

oting SA A

nner SA A

nternational R

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stl

Di

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

D NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

46 The sc

47 I feel v

48 I am sa

49 The sta

50 I feel s

51 Learne

52 The sc

53 The sc

54 Parents

55 Parents

56 Parents

57 Parents

58 I feel f

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

3 I fee

need

4 The

5 The

6 Exis

7 I kno

Learning a

8 We

hool deals with

valued at school

atisfied with the

aff supports sch

supported by my

ers participate a

hool fosters mu

hool fosters mu

s regularly follo

s readily coope

s attend parents

s participate in

fulfilled workin

dix II Stude

nal Leadership

Head andor A

Head andor A

el comfortable

ded

Head andor A

school values m

sting school pol

ow who to appr

and Teaching

practice democ

h cases of bullyi

l

e schoolrsquos effor

hool initiatives

y colleagues

actively in schoo

utual respect am

utual respect am

ow their childrsquos

rate with the sc

srsquo day

activities organ

ng in my school

ent Question

and Managem

ssistant Head k

ssistant Head v

approaching th

ssistant Head a

my opinion

licies are effecti

roach in differe

cracy in school

ing immediately

rts to tackle abse

ol organised act

mong staff mem

mong learners

s educational pr

chool

nised by the sch

nnaire

ment

know me person

visit our class re

he Head ando

re fair when tak

ive

nt situations

93

y and effectivel

enteeism

tivities

mbers

rogress

hool

nally

egularly

or Assistant He

king decisions

In

ly SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA A

SA ASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

ead when SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

Not

Sure

A A NS

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Not

Sur

e

Disa

gree

Stro

ngl

Disa

gree

S D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

9 The

10 I am

scho

11 My

12 I lik

13 All

less

14 Dur

15 The

16 The

17 The

18 The

19 I fe

diff

20 I am

21 The

22 I am

School Cli

23 I fe

trou

24 The

25 The

26 I fe

27 The

serv

28 I pa

29 I fe

30 My

scho

31 My

hom

e school organis

m given the op

ool

y classmates beh

ke the way my c

learners are g

son

ring some lesso

e teachers make

e teachers ask u

e teachers teach

e teachers tell m

eel confident to

ficulty

m given homew

e homework is a

m encouraged to

imate

eel confident to

ubled

e school handle

e school deals w

el happy at sch

e school provid

vice

articipate active

el respected by

y parents are in

ool

y parents help

mework

ses various acti

pportunity to pa

have well durin

class is decorat

given the opp

ons we are given

e lessons interes

us questions to s

h in a way I und

me how to impro

ask the Learni

work regularly

always correcte

o do well

o go to the guid

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

ool

des learners w

ely in school org

y the other stude

nformed regular

me when I h

vities

articipate in ac

ng lessons

ed

ortunity to pa

n the opportuni

sting by using d

see what we hav

derstand

ove my work

ing Support As

ed by the teache

dance teacher w

problems effecti

ullying effective

ith an effective

ganised activitie

ents

rly of what I am

have difficultie

94

ctivities organis

articipate active

ity to work in gr

different resour

ve understood

ssistant [LSA] i

er

when I feel SA

ively SA

ely SA

SA

e guidance SA

es SA

SA

m doing in SA

s with my SA

In

SA

sed by the SA

SA

SA

ely in the SA

roups SA

ces SA

SA

SA

SA

if I have a SA

SA

SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

Agr

ee

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

nternational R

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

A A NS

Not

Sur

e

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

NS D

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

S D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

Append

Education

1 The

2 The

cha

3 The

4 The

rele

5 I am

6 I ha

Ass

7 The

8 Exi

Learning

9 The

10 The

11 The

12 Lea

ben

13 Tea

14 Hom

15 Tea

16 My

imp

17 I re

18 I am

School Cli

dix III Pare

nal Leadership

e Head of Schoo

e Head and A

anges in the sch

e Head andor A

e Head andor

evant for me as

m asked for my

ave sufficient o

sistant Heads

e Head andor A

isting school po

and Teaching

e school suppor

e school helps l

e school enhanc

arning Support

nefit of all learn

achers provide r

mework is suite

achers regularly

y child is give

prove

eceive regular fe

m satisfied with

imate

ent Question

p and Managem

ol has a clear vi

ssistant Heads

ool

Assistant Heads

Assistant Head

a person

views about th

opportunities to

Assistant Heads

olicies are effect

rts learners in d

earners develop

ces learning thro

Assistants (LSA

ners

reasonable amo

ed for my child

y correct my chi

en feedback on

eedback on the

h the academic p

nnaire

ment

ision for the sch

are doing the

are available to

ds organise reg

he school at leas

o communicate

communicate e

tive

eveloping their

p as democratic

ough co-curricu

As) and teacher

unt of homewo

rsquos ability

ildrsquos homework

n hisher work

academic perfo

performance of

95

hool

eir best to brin

o listen to my c

gular meetings

st once a year

e with the Hea

effectively with

r full potential

c citizens

ular activities

rs work togethe

ork

k

k to enable him

ormance of my

f my child

In

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

SA

ng about SA

concerns SA

that are SA

SA

ad andor SA

h me SA

SASt

rong

ly A

gree

SA

SA

SA

er for the SA

SA

SA

SA

mher to SA

child SA

SA

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee

nternational R

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS A

gree

Not

Sur

e

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

Agr

ee

Not

Sur

e

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

Disa

gree

Stro

ngly

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

Stro

ngly

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Disa

gree

Not

App

licab

le

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the

19 The

20 The

a

b

c

21 The

guid

22 Ind

stat

23 The

goo

24 The

25 The

26 The

27 I am

28 My

29 The

30 I re

31 Par

32 I re

33 I am

34 I re

35 The

36 I wo

Copyri

Copyrig

This arCreativ

e school promot

e school addres

Gifted and ta

Learners wit

Learners from

e school provi

dance

dividual educat

tement of needs

e schoolrsquos beha

od behaviour

e school handle

e school deals w

e school values

m satisfied with

y child participa

e school encour

egularly follow

rents readily coo

egularly attend p

m invited to tak

egularly take pa

e school addres

ould recommen

ight Disclai

ght reserved

rticle is ane Commons

tes studentsrsquo se

ses the needs o

alented learners

th special educa

m diverse cultu

ides learners w

tional program

s are updated re

aviour managem

s disciplinary p

with cases of bu

parentsrsquo contrib

h the schoolrsquos ef

ates actively in s

rages respect am

my childrsquos educ

operate with the

parentsrsquo day

ke part in school

rt in school eve

ses problems I

nd the school to

imer

d by the auth

n open-acces Attribution

lf-esteem

f

s

ational needs

ural andor lingu

with effective

mmes (IEPs)

egularly

ment policy is e

problems in a fir

ullying immedia

bution

fforts to tackle a

school organise

mong parents

cational progres

e school

l events

ents

raise in a timely

o other parents

hors

ess article dn license (h

96

uistic backgrou

personal and

for learners w

effective in pro

rm but caring m

ately and effect

absenteeism

ed activities

ss

y manner

distributed httpcreativ

In

SA

SA

SA

nds SA

career SA

with a SA

omoting SA

manner SA

tively SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

SA

under the vecommons

nternational R

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

A NS

terms and sorglicense

Research in EISSN 2

2020 Vol

httpiremacr

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

D SD

d conditionsesby30)

Education 2327-5499

8 No 1

rothinkorg

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

s of the