arctel-cplp recent developments - itu: committed to ... · •part i –introduction and framework...
TRANSCRIPT
0. Resume 1. Introduction: Digital Agenda 2. Indicators
3. In the path of a Digital Agenda 4. Recommended
Strategies
Presentation Index
• Became Consultive member of the CPLP (IO);
• Organized the IX Ministerial Meeting of CPLP (1st in the last 12 years)
• Assumed the Permanent Secretariat fo the Ministerial Meeting;
• Developed a study on Universal Service in the CPLP (with ITU);
• Is starting 2 other studies:
– e-commerce (with ITU and UNCITRAL);
– Smart Harbors (with ITU and APLOP)
• Initiated the Digital Agenda Study for CPLP
Since the last participation in RAS:
• Part I – Introduction and Framework
• Part II – CPLP: its Macroeconomic Indicators and Relevant ICT’s
• Part III – Main trends in the Digital World
• Part IV – Digital Strategies and Iniciatives in CPLP
• Part V – In the path of a Digital Agenda for CPLP
The study is organized in five parts:
Digital Agenda: Structure
• IX CPLP Ministers of Communications Meeting – Maputo, 19-08-2016
• Recognized the need to work on a Digital Agenda for the CPLP
• Acknowledgment that we live on a new paradigm in the Communications framework on which ICT’s can
boost growth , generate wealth and surpass time and space barriers. Therefore, this Digital Agenda shall
be a common agenda serving the collective interests of the Community and the individual priorities of
each Member State at the same time.
1. Introduction
• The Digital Agenda aims to stablish, at a medium and long term, a core strategy, a common and
central guide to allow that, in a period of 10 years, the Members become:
o A reference in broadband access and coverage in the CPLP space;
o A role model in the ICT’s use;
o A example on Information Society and Eletronic Governance;
o A reference in the use of the eletronic commerce in the CPLP market;
o A reference in the implementation of the UN’s Sustainable Development Agenda for 2030;
These are the drivers for the ellaboration of a Digital Agenda for the CPLP
1. Introduction
The project has the support of ITU and will be divided in two phases:
The first phase will focus on assessment
The second phase will be splitted in three different sections:
i) creation of a framework based on common issues;
ii) definition of a project structure to each Member;
iii) definition of plans to implement the Digital Agenda adapted to each Member State;
This Study is focused on the Phase 1
(PHASE 1)
Preparatory Study
(PHASE 2)
Create a Digital Agenda model for theCPLP
(EXECUTION PHASE)
Approval of the Agenda by each MemberState
Project approved by ITU
1. Introduction
The aim is to create a Digital Agenda FOR the CPLP and not TO the CPLP – which means that the effortsand responsibility to implement the proposals included in the Digital Agenda for the CPLP will rely oneach Member State
The goal is not to define a single Digital Agenda to be adopted by the Member States, since it’sperceived that each Member has a different socio-economic reality.
We take into account that macroeconomic elements and ICT’s levels of evolution are different in eachcountry.
Considering this, the proposal is to create a common set of recommendations and orientations for theCPLP, that can be used by each country according to their national priorities.
This Study can and should be used by the Members as a reference, so that their national agendas can be based in common guidelines and experiences within the CPLP space.
1. Introduction
Conceptualization
FIXED TELEPHONY PENETRATION RATE
45.3%
18.1%11.1%
3.4% 1.1% 0.3% 0.2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Portugal Brasil Cabo Verde S. Tomé ePríncipe
Angola Moçambique Timor Leste G. Bissau* G. Equatorial*
2. Indicators
*No data available
MOBILE TELEPHONE SERVICE PENETRATION RATE
162.4%
126.1% 123.2%
97.4%
75.0% 74.8%
55.8% 54.3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Portugal Brasil Cabo Verde S. Tomé ePríncipe
G. Bissau Moçambique Timor Leste* Angola G. Equatorial**
2. Indicators
**No data available
INTERNET USERS (%)
3.5%
9.0%
12.4%
13.4%
21.3%
25.8%
43.0%
59.1%
68.6%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
G. Bissau
Moçambique
Angola
Timor Leste
G. Equatorial
S. Tomé e Príncipe
Cabo Verde
Brasil
Portugal
2. Indicators
HOUSES WITH COMPUTERS AND/OR INTERNET ACCESS (%)
11%
54%
34%
3%
19%
6%
71%
7%
19%
10%
55%
27%
2%9%
13%
70%
0%
22%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Angola Brasil Cabo Verde G. Bissau G. Equatorial Moçambique Portugal S. Tomé ePríncipe*
Timor Leste
Houses w/computer
Houses w/computer andinternet access
2. Indicators
MOBILE BROADBAND SERVICE PENETRATION RATE
88.3%
58.9%53.4%
20.9% 18.9% 17.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Brasil Cabo Verde Portugal Moçambique S. Tomé ePríncipe
Angola Timor Leste* G. Bissau* G. Equatorial*
2. Indicators
*No data available
29.1%
12.5%
2.9% 1.2% 0.6% 0.1% 0.1%0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Portugal Brasil Cabo Verde S. Tomé ePríncipe
Angola G. Bissau Moçambique Timor Leste* G. Equatorial*
FIXED BROADBAND SERVICE PENETRATION RATE
2. Indicators
*No data available
4.7
7.7
4.7
2.8
5.5
3.2
8.9
4.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
Angola Brasil Cabo Verde G. Bissau G. Equatorial Moçambique Portugal S. Tomé ePríncipe*
Timor Leste
Years
2. Indicators
AVERAGE PERIOD OF SCHOOLING / YEARS
*No data available
32%
106%
93%
35%28% 25%
120%
73%
10%
26% 23%
3% 3% 6%
66%
18%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
Angola Brasil Cabo Verde G. Bissau G. Equatorial Moçambique Portugal S. Tomé ePríncipe*
Timor Leste
High School
University
2. Indicators
INDEX OF SCHOOLING: HIGH SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITY
*No data available
2.0
5.7
4.2
1.31.8 1.6
6.6
2.9
2.0
6.0
4.6
1.41.9 1.8
6.9
3.1
Angola Brasil Cabo Verde G. Bissau G. Equatorial Moçambique Portugal S. Tomé ePríncipe*
Timor Leste
2015 2016
2. Indicators
IDI 2015 VS 2016
*No data available
Africa Europe Americas
Country Regional Ranking
Cabo Verde 4
Angola 21
G. Equatorial 26
Moçambique 28
G. Bissau 37
S. Tomé e Príncipe* -
Total 39 Countries
Country Regional Ranking
Portugal 29
Total 40 Countries
Country Regional Ranking
Brasil 9
Total 34 Countries
2. Indicators
REGIONAL RANKING 2016
*No data available
Asia
Country Regional Ranking
East Timor 24
Total 50 Countries
Country World Ranking
Portugal 44
Brasil 63
Cabo Verde 97
Angola 128
Timor Leste 154
G. Equatorial 160
Moçambique 163
G. Bissau 173
S. Tomé e Príncipe* -
Total 175 Countries
2. Indicators
WORLD RANKING 2016
*No data available
The CPLP’s Member States present substantial diferences in macroeconomic and ICT Indicators, whichdemonstrates the diversity of realities lived withitn the community space
There is a group of countries more advanced in the digital domain, namely Brazil, Cape Verde andPortugal
In the remaining countries it isn’t possible to identify common tendencies to form heterogeneousgroups, but even though, with the indicators available, we can assume that Angola, Equatorial Guinea, Mozambique and East Timor could form a secondary group in digital development terms.
Concluding, and even though this analysis had some lack of information sources available, it looks possible to conclude that Guinea Bissau and Sao Tome and Principe present the major needs at thislevel.
2. Indicators
GRAPHICS ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS
27
COMMON DIGITAL STRENGTHS
Common language and similar culture
Similar Legal Regulatory Framework
Similar Policies
MAJOR POINTS OF DIFFERENCE
Different stages in terms of ICT Indicators
No common market (freedom of circulation)
Different Digital Competences (absence ofenforcement)
The implementation of a Digital Agenda for CPLP shall be divided in three levels:
Agenda
Strategies
Measures
3. Digital Agenda
PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL MODEL
It will be a document of programatic nature, macro-objective, of strategic policies,
that will define the fundamental pillars to the construction of a Digital Society and
Economy in each Member State;
The strategies shall work on and detail further what is conceived in each
pillar, identifying at the same time particular goals and key areas of
intervention. These will constitute documents of political character, that
shall elaborate the vision of each Member State to the implementation of
the pillars on the agenda;
The measures shall result in concrete actions to execute
the above mentioned strategies approved and the vision
adopted in the agenda. Here, it will be essential to draw on
goals, responsabilities, monitorization measures, as well as
evaluation measures
Rise the population’sDigital Literacy and reduce
the Digital Divide
Promote the evolution ofbroadband networks
Promote access to electronic
communications andInformation Society in
remote areas
Ensure the proximitybetween the citizen and
the Public Administrationand increase efficiency in
Public Administration
Promote the economicDevelopment of key-sectors through ICT
Increase quality in healthservices and other basic
services for the Populationand local economy
through the use of ICT
Develop Investigation & Science
Promote the use of ICT in the Education System
Promote cooperation and digital approximation
between CPLP countries
Promote
Sustainable Development
Foster
Entrepreneurship
Increase
Competitiveness
3. Digital Agenda
GUIDELINES
InformationTechnology
InformationSecurity
E-CommerceDigital Literacy
and Capacitation
ElectronicCommunications
3. Digital Agenda
DIGITAL AGENDA MAIN PILLARS
DIGITAL AGENDA TREE
Digital Agenda
Electronic Communications
Submarine Cables Strategy
Connectivity/Broadband Strategy
Spacial Strategy
Information
Technology
e-Gov Strategy
e-Health Strategy
I&D and Innovation Strategy
Electronic Commerce
Electronic commerce and Digital entertainment
Strategy
Postal strategy
Information Security
Cibersecurity Strategy
Privacy and Personal Data Strategy
Digital Literacy
Literacy and Digital Citizenship Strategy
Submarine Cables Strategy
Broadband/Connectivity Strategy
Spacial Strategy
eGovernment Strategy
eHealth Strategy
I&D and Innovation Strategy
Electronic commerce and Digital EntertainmentStrategy
Cibersecurity Strategy
Data Protection and Privacy Strategy
Literacy and Digital Citizenship Strategy
4. Strategies
STRATEGIES TO IMPLEMENT