arctel-cplp recent developments - itu: committed to ... · •part i –introduction and framework...

34
ARCTEL-CPLP Recent developments

Upload: nguyenminh

Post on 12-Dec-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

ARCTEL-CPLP

Recent developments

0. Resume 1. Introduction: Digital Agenda 2. Indicators

3. In the path of a Digital Agenda 4. Recommended

Strategies

Presentation Index

0. RESUME

3

• Became Consultive member of the CPLP (IO);

• Organized the IX Ministerial Meeting of CPLP (1st in the last 12 years)

• Assumed the Permanent Secretariat fo the Ministerial Meeting;

• Developed a study on Universal Service in the CPLP (with ITU);

• Is starting 2 other studies:

– e-commerce (with ITU and UNCITRAL);

– Smart Harbors (with ITU and APLOP)

• Initiated the Digital Agenda Study for CPLP

Since the last participation in RAS:

1. INTRODUCTION: DIGITAL AGENDA

5

• Part I – Introduction and Framework

• Part II – CPLP: its Macroeconomic Indicators and Relevant ICT’s

• Part III – Main trends in the Digital World

• Part IV – Digital Strategies and Iniciatives in CPLP

• Part V – In the path of a Digital Agenda for CPLP

The study is organized in five parts:

Digital Agenda: Structure

• IX CPLP Ministers of Communications Meeting – Maputo, 19-08-2016

• Recognized the need to work on a Digital Agenda for the CPLP

• Acknowledgment that we live on a new paradigm in the Communications framework on which ICT’s can

boost growth , generate wealth and surpass time and space barriers. Therefore, this Digital Agenda shall

be a common agenda serving the collective interests of the Community and the individual priorities of

each Member State at the same time.

1. Introduction

• The Digital Agenda aims to stablish, at a medium and long term, a core strategy, a common and

central guide to allow that, in a period of 10 years, the Members become:

o A reference in broadband access and coverage in the CPLP space;

o A role model in the ICT’s use;

o A example on Information Society and Eletronic Governance;

o A reference in the use of the eletronic commerce in the CPLP market;

o A reference in the implementation of the UN’s Sustainable Development Agenda for 2030;

These are the drivers for the ellaboration of a Digital Agenda for the CPLP

1. Introduction

The project has the support of ITU and will be divided in two phases:

The first phase will focus on assessment

The second phase will be splitted in three different sections:

i) creation of a framework based on common issues;

ii) definition of a project structure to each Member;

iii) definition of plans to implement the Digital Agenda adapted to each Member State;

This Study is focused on the Phase 1

(PHASE 1)

Preparatory Study

(PHASE 2)

Create a Digital Agenda model for theCPLP

(EXECUTION PHASE)

Approval of the Agenda by each MemberState

Project approved by ITU

1. Introduction

The aim is to create a Digital Agenda FOR the CPLP and not TO the CPLP – which means that the effortsand responsibility to implement the proposals included in the Digital Agenda for the CPLP will rely oneach Member State

The goal is not to define a single Digital Agenda to be adopted by the Member States, since it’sperceived that each Member has a different socio-economic reality.

We take into account that macroeconomic elements and ICT’s levels of evolution are different in eachcountry.

Considering this, the proposal is to create a common set of recommendations and orientations for theCPLP, that can be used by each country according to their national priorities.

This Study can and should be used by the Members as a reference, so that their national agendas can be based in common guidelines and experiences within the CPLP space.

1. Introduction

Conceptualization

2. INDICATORS:ACCESS & USE

11

FIXED TELEPHONY PENETRATION RATE

45.3%

18.1%11.1%

3.4% 1.1% 0.3% 0.2%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Portugal Brasil Cabo Verde S. Tomé ePríncipe

Angola Moçambique Timor Leste G. Bissau* G. Equatorial*

2. Indicators

*No data available

MOBILE TELEPHONE SERVICE PENETRATION RATE

162.4%

126.1% 123.2%

97.4%

75.0% 74.8%

55.8% 54.3%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

180%

200%

Portugal Brasil Cabo Verde S. Tomé ePríncipe

G. Bissau Moçambique Timor Leste* Angola G. Equatorial**

2. Indicators

**No data available

INTERNET USERS (%)

3.5%

9.0%

12.4%

13.4%

21.3%

25.8%

43.0%

59.1%

68.6%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

G. Bissau

Moçambique

Angola

Timor Leste

G. Equatorial

S. Tomé e Príncipe

Cabo Verde

Brasil

Portugal

2. Indicators

HOUSES WITH COMPUTERS AND/OR INTERNET ACCESS (%)

11%

54%

34%

3%

19%

6%

71%

7%

19%

10%

55%

27%

2%9%

13%

70%

0%

22%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Angola Brasil Cabo Verde G. Bissau G. Equatorial Moçambique Portugal S. Tomé ePríncipe*

Timor Leste

Houses w/computer

Houses w/computer andinternet access

2. Indicators

MOBILE BROADBAND SERVICE PENETRATION RATE

88.3%

58.9%53.4%

20.9% 18.9% 17.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Brasil Cabo Verde Portugal Moçambique S. Tomé ePríncipe

Angola Timor Leste* G. Bissau* G. Equatorial*

2. Indicators

*No data available

29.1%

12.5%

2.9% 1.2% 0.6% 0.1% 0.1%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Portugal Brasil Cabo Verde S. Tomé ePríncipe

Angola G. Bissau Moçambique Timor Leste* G. Equatorial*

FIXED BROADBAND SERVICE PENETRATION RATE

2. Indicators

*No data available

2. INDICATORS:EDUCATION

18

4.7

7.7

4.7

2.8

5.5

3.2

8.9

4.4

0

2

4

6

8

10

Angola Brasil Cabo Verde G. Bissau G. Equatorial Moçambique Portugal S. Tomé ePríncipe*

Timor Leste

Years

2. Indicators

AVERAGE PERIOD OF SCHOOLING / YEARS

*No data available

32%

106%

93%

35%28% 25%

120%

73%

10%

26% 23%

3% 3% 6%

66%

18%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

Angola Brasil Cabo Verde G. Bissau G. Equatorial Moçambique Portugal S. Tomé ePríncipe*

Timor Leste

High School

University

2. Indicators

INDEX OF SCHOOLING: HIGH SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITY

*No data available

2. INDICATORS:ICT DEVELOPMENTINDEX (IDI)

21

2.0

5.7

4.2

1.31.8 1.6

6.6

2.9

2.0

6.0

4.6

1.41.9 1.8

6.9

3.1

Angola Brasil Cabo Verde G. Bissau G. Equatorial Moçambique Portugal S. Tomé ePríncipe*

Timor Leste

2015 2016

2. Indicators

IDI 2015 VS 2016

*No data available

Africa Europe Americas

Country Regional Ranking

Cabo Verde 4

Angola 21

G. Equatorial 26

Moçambique 28

G. Bissau 37

S. Tomé e Príncipe* -

Total 39 Countries

Country Regional Ranking

Portugal 29

Total 40 Countries

Country Regional Ranking

Brasil 9

Total 34 Countries

2. Indicators

REGIONAL RANKING 2016

*No data available

Asia

Country Regional Ranking

East Timor 24

Total 50 Countries

Country World Ranking

Portugal 44

Brasil 63

Cabo Verde 97

Angola 128

Timor Leste 154

G. Equatorial 160

Moçambique 163

G. Bissau 173

S. Tomé e Príncipe* -

Total 175 Countries

2. Indicators

WORLD RANKING 2016

*No data available

The CPLP’s Member States present substantial diferences in macroeconomic and ICT Indicators, whichdemonstrates the diversity of realities lived withitn the community space

There is a group of countries more advanced in the digital domain, namely Brazil, Cape Verde andPortugal

In the remaining countries it isn’t possible to identify common tendencies to form heterogeneousgroups, but even though, with the indicators available, we can assume that Angola, Equatorial Guinea, Mozambique and East Timor could form a secondary group in digital development terms.

Concluding, and even though this analysis had some lack of information sources available, it looks possible to conclude that Guinea Bissau and Sao Tome and Principe present the major needs at thislevel.

2. Indicators

GRAPHICS ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS

3. IN THE PATH OF A DIGITAL AGENDA FOR CPLP

26

27

COMMON DIGITAL STRENGTHS

Common language and similar culture

Similar Legal Regulatory Framework

Similar Policies

MAJOR POINTS OF DIFFERENCE

Different stages in terms of ICT Indicators

No common market (freedom of circulation)

Different Digital Competences (absence ofenforcement)

The implementation of a Digital Agenda for CPLP shall be divided in three levels:

Agenda

Strategies

Measures

3. Digital Agenda

PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL MODEL

It will be a document of programatic nature, macro-objective, of strategic policies,

that will define the fundamental pillars to the construction of a Digital Society and

Economy in each Member State;

The strategies shall work on and detail further what is conceived in each

pillar, identifying at the same time particular goals and key areas of

intervention. These will constitute documents of political character, that

shall elaborate the vision of each Member State to the implementation of

the pillars on the agenda;

The measures shall result in concrete actions to execute

the above mentioned strategies approved and the vision

adopted in the agenda. Here, it will be essential to draw on

goals, responsabilities, monitorization measures, as well as

evaluation measures

Rise the population’sDigital Literacy and reduce

the Digital Divide

Promote the evolution ofbroadband networks

Promote access to electronic

communications andInformation Society in

remote areas

Ensure the proximitybetween the citizen and

the Public Administrationand increase efficiency in

Public Administration

Promote the economicDevelopment of key-sectors through ICT

Increase quality in healthservices and other basic

services for the Populationand local economy

through the use of ICT

Develop Investigation & Science

Promote the use of ICT in the Education System

Promote cooperation and digital approximation

between CPLP countries

Promote

Sustainable Development

Foster

Entrepreneurship

Increase

Competitiveness

3. Digital Agenda

GUIDELINES

InformationTechnology

InformationSecurity

E-CommerceDigital Literacy

and Capacitation

ElectronicCommunications

3. Digital Agenda

DIGITAL AGENDA MAIN PILLARS

DIGITAL AGENDA TREE

Digital Agenda

Electronic Communications

Submarine Cables Strategy

Connectivity/Broadband Strategy

Spacial Strategy

Information

Technology

e-Gov Strategy

e-Health Strategy

I&D and Innovation Strategy

Electronic Commerce

Electronic commerce and Digital entertainment

Strategy

Postal strategy

Information Security

Cibersecurity Strategy

Privacy and Personal Data Strategy

Digital Literacy

Literacy and Digital Citizenship Strategy

4. RECOMMENDEDSTRATEGIES

32

Submarine Cables Strategy

Broadband/Connectivity Strategy

Spacial Strategy

eGovernment Strategy

eHealth Strategy

I&D and Innovation Strategy

Electronic commerce and Digital EntertainmentStrategy

Cibersecurity Strategy

Data Protection and Privacy Strategy

Literacy and Digital Citizenship Strategy

4. Strategies

STRATEGIES TO IMPLEMENT

Thank you all,

Filipe Baptista

[email protected]