aravind mamidi presentation on energy saving...

30
Aravind Mamidi 30 th Aug 2017 Honeywell Internal Presentation on Energy saving Projects

Upload: trandang

Post on 23-May-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Aravind Mamidi30 th Aug 2017

Honeywell Internal

Presentation on Energy saving Projects

Honeywell Confidential - © 2017 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Honeywell Technology Solutions - Global Presence

2

ChinaShanghai

Beijing

Other locations

IndiaBengaluru

Hyderabad

Madurai

Guru gram

Czech

RepublicPrague

Brno

MexicoMexico City

Chihuahua

Juarez

Tijuana

1994Established in India

+9,000Employees globally

50%+Engineers focused on software

100%CMMI Maturity Level 5 certified

Businesses We Serve

Aerospace Home and Building Technologies

Performance Materials and Technologies

Safety and Productivity Solutions

PRESENTATION ON

CII NATIONAL AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN ENERGY MANAGEMENT

30th August to 1st Sep 2017

BYReshmi ShankarAravind Mamidi

Sholapur Vijay Kumar

Building 1 Building 2 RemarksNo of Floors G+4 G+2

Area 125733 Sq. ft. 28000 Sq. ft.

Year of operation 2008 2016

Contracted demand 1550 kva

MAX Demand 1163 kva

DG capacity 1055 X2 Kva ,380 Kva 1 no's

Occupancy 90% ( 1250 )

Operating Hours 9 hours 5 days week 9 Hours 5 days week Labs(12000 sq ft area), Go Direct Flight services and server rooms operates 24X7

Annual energy use is around 34 lakh KWH with the spend of 2.75 crores , including diesel cost

Site profile -- HTS Hyderabad, Telangana

5

Installation of solar water heater (2014)

Investment –Rs 70000

Savings – 14151 KWh -INR 1,20,280

ROI - 0.6 years

Timer for street lights (2015)

Investment – INR 45000

Savings -4908 Kwh –INR 41,788

ROI – 0.9 years

LED street lights , cove lighting parking lighting (2016)

Investment –Rs 685000

Savings – 61762 kwh , INR 5,24,927

ROI – 1.1 years

Installation of adiabatic system (2015)

Investment : INR 10.08 lakhs

Savings : 43334 Kwh INR 3,68,333

ROI 2.5 years

Installation new aerators for Taps (2016)Investment – Rs 22 000Savings – 1141 Kwh Rs 9,700 ROI – 2.5 years

Energy Projects completed Years 2014-17

6

EC Fan installation for AHU (2017 WIP)

Investment – 25 lakhs

Saving Kwh - 70588 KWh INR 6,00.000

ROI -4.5 years

Status- In progress

Installation of PAC unit for server room (2016)

Investment :INR 16 lakhs

Savings : 84902 Kwh INR 5,15,000

ROI -3.1 years

Replacement of UPS 60 kva to 10 kva(2016)

Investment : INR 5.4 lakhs

Savings : 14227 Kwh INR 1,28,000

ROI : 3.4 years

Solar thermal system (2014)Investment : INR 2.6 crores Savings 1.33 lakh units INR 11,96,000ROI 12 years

Energy Projects completed Years 2014-17

Total energy saving achieved 5,69,580 kwh INR 48.42 lacs

Energy Projects Planned in the years 2018

7

Solar PV 100 kW

Investment :INR 55 lacs

Savings : 155000 Kwh INR 13.17 lacs

ROI -4.2 years - On Hold due to Phase III construction on Hold .

Occupancy control for conference room AC units.

Investment : INR 1.2 lacs

Savings : App 4500 kwh INR 38250

ROI : 4 years planned in 2018

Wheeling energy PPAInvestment TBD ROI – TBD Principally got clearance from management

8

170072

254508

145000

569580

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

Energy saving KWH

2014 2015 2016 Total

THE

GREEN

METRICS

455.7 tons

48.42

lakhsINR

$71.201 K

Co2 Mitigation

Monetary Saving

569680kWh

Power Saving

Energy saving Trend – HTS HYD year 2014-16

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Disclaimers As Needed (Consult Legal)

ENERGY SAVINGS TREND

2014 compared to 2013 – Saving 170,072 kWh

9

Baseline-2013 KWH 2,481,349

2014 Actual Consumption in KWH 2,875,177

2014 Normalized consumption in KWH 2,311,277

Savings Achieved in KWH 170,072

% of savings achieved in 2014 compared to 2013 7%

2,481,349 2,311,277

2,875,177

-

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

Baseline-2013 KWH 2014 Normalizedconsumption in KWH

2014 Actual Consumptionin KWH

Increase in working days

Increase in Occupancy

Increase in Operational hours

Weather ImpactLoad Addition

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Disclaimers As Needed (Consult Legal)

ENERGY SAVINGS TREND

2015 compared to 2014 – 254,508 kWh

10

Baseline-2014 KWH 2,875,177

2015 Actual Consumption in KWH 3,200,945

2015 Normalized consumption in KWH 2,605,673

Savings Achieved in KWH 254,508

% of savings achieved in 2015 compared to 2014 9.37%

2,875,177

2,605,673

3,200,945

-

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

Baseline-2014 KWH 2015 Normalizedconsumption in KWH

2015 ActualConsumption in KWH

Increase in

Occupancy

Increase in operational hours

Load Addition

Weather Impact

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Disclaimers As Needed (Consult Legal)

ENERGY SAVINGS TREND

2016 compared to 2015 145,308 KWH

kWh

11

Baseline-2015 KWH 3,200,945

2016 Actual Consumption in KWH 3,384,374

2016 Normalized consumption in KWH 3,055,637

Savings Achieved in KWH 145,308

% of savings achieved in 2016 compared to 2015 4.54%

3050000

3100000

3150000

3200000

3250000

3300000

3350000

3400000

2015 Actual 2016 Normalized 2016 Actual

Load Addition

Increase in operational hours

Increase in

Occupancy

Weather Impact

3,200,945 3,055,637

3,384,374

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Disclaimers As Needed (Consult Legal)

SEC 2014 -2016

12

258

289

241

202

228218

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2014 2015 2016

SEC 2014-2016

Actual SEC Normalized SEC

13

HVAC46%

UPS21%

Lighting 7%

Raw power 16%

UTILITY

10%

HVAC UPS Lighting Raw power UTLTY

AREA KWH /Year 2016

HVAC 1368127

UPS 637212

Raw power 479320

UTILITY 294684

Lighting 222661

Energy Distribution- Year 2016 HTS Hyderabad

Highest power consumption in HAVC and UPS loads

14

HVAC

BMS integration

Ambient air supply in winter

Adiabatic system

Capacity optimization

Solar VAM

system

EC Fans for AHU

Energy saving projects In HVAC area

THE

GREEN

METRICS

174.9 tons

18.58 Lakh

INR

$27329

Co2 Mitigation

Monetary Saving

218635kWh

Power Saving

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Disclaimers As Needed (Consult Legal)

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Disclaimers As Needed (Consult Legal)

Savings achieved 2016 –Rs 515100 ($7575) – Investment Rs 16 lacs ROI 3.1 years

15

KAIZEN

CAMPUS : HTSL - HYDERABAD KAIZEN AREA :

TARGET

KAIZEN START

KAIZEN FINISH

BENEFITS: 1. Phase out of

R-22 refrigerant, ECO

friendly gas

2. Energy savings – 84902

KWH

KAIZEN .No:

02

PROBLEM / PRESENT STATUS:

BEFORE COUNTER MEASURE :

AFTER

RESULTS: 1. Phase out of R-22 refrigerant and using

eco- friendly refrigerant

2. Cost savings due to lesser capacity of PAC

(existing 16.5TRx2 Nos package AC

replaced with 9TRx2 Nos Precision AC

resulting in energy saving of $18 K so far

$8k per year

3. Investment INRS 1025 lacs

KAIZEN THEME: Safety, Cost IDEA: Phasing out of R-22 refrigerant to achieve energy savings

by replacing Packaged AC (16HP)with Precision AC(7.5HP) with

ECO friendly Gas

TEAM MEMBERS: Venkat

Rao, Sivakumar, A.

Suresh, G. Suresh

RESULT AREA

Server room AC system S Q D C P

Server room AC

15-12-15

17-7-16

1st PAC

unit

installed

2nd APC

Installatio

n Packag

ed unit

only

used

Energy saving &

Eco friendly gas

Idea implemented on server room AC system

Before

Month KWH

15-Apr 8274

15-May 8651

15-Jun 8510

16-Feb 6460

16-Mar 7791

16-Apr 9350

Total 49036

Avg 8173

After

Month KWH

15-Jul 2895

15-Aug 2782

15-Sep 2190

16-Jul 3520

16-Aug 3651

16-Sep 3698

Total 18736

Avg 3123

16

Work station UPS Lab UPS Server UPS FOC UPS PHASE-2 FOC UPS

120KVA-1 120KVA-2120KVA-5

120KVA-3 120KVA-4 40KVA-1 40KVA-2 60KVA-1 60KVA-2 80KVA 10KVA-1 10KVA-2

2016 21.70% 23% 23% 27.10% 26.90% 19% 18.60% 3.60% 0.00% - - -

2017 20.60% 22%22.00

%27.20% 27.40% 15.90% 15.70% - - 6.80% 9% 14.70%

UPS load sharing details 2

1.7

0%

23

%

23

% 27

.10

%

26

.90

%

19

%

18

.60

%

3.6

0%

0.0

0%

0 0 020

.60

%

22

%

22

.00

%

27

.20

%

27

.40

%

15

.90

%

15

.70

%

0 0 6.8

0%

9%

14

.70

%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

120KVA-1 120KVA-2 120KVA-5 120KVA-3 120KVA-4 40KVA-1 40KVA-2 60KVA-1 60KVA-2 80KVA 10KVA-1 10KVA-2

Work station UPS Lab UPS Server UPS FOC UPS PHASE-2 FOC UPS

UPS Max load Recorded

2016 2017

UPS NO LOAD POWER CONSUMPTION DETAILS

Load Per hour Per day consumption Per month Kwh Per yearKwh Cost /year INR

120KVA UPS 10 Amps 6.2534 150.0816 4502.4 54028.8 459244.8 459244 saving

80KVA UPS 8 Amps 5.0027 120.0648 3601.944 43223.328 367398.288

60 KVA 6 Amps 3.752 90.048 2161.152 25933.824 220437.504

40 KVA UPS 4 Amps 2.501 60.024 1800.72 21608.64 183673.44

10KVA UPS 2 Amps 1.2507 30.0168 900.504 10806.048 91851.408 128586.1 Saving

Note : consumption considered based on input from OEM

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Disclaimers As Needed (Consult Legal)

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Disclaimers As Needed (Consult Legal)

Redundancy improvement resulted zeroing down the failure ,one time cost avoidance Rs 5 .14 lacs

additional UPS running cost ($8092)

17

KAIZEN

CAMPUS : HTSL - HYDERABAD KAIZEN AREA : Ground floor UPS Room for Lab UPS

TARGET

KAIZEN START

KAIZEN FINISH

4th Jan-16

BENEFITS: Zero down

time of UPS power to lab by

increased redundancy and cost

avoidance , elimination of

additional running cost of UPS

KAZN.No:03

PROBLEM / PRESENT STATUS: Before COUNTER MEASURE : After

RESULTS:

1.Improve redundancy to Lab UPS.

2 INR Rs 5,14,000/($8092) (- cost avoidance by avoiding procurement of new

UPS to facilitate N+1+1 redundancy.

3 Saved energy INR 4,58,244

4)Avoidance of AMC cost on one 120 Kva UPS year

KAIZEN THEME: Delivery, Cost IDEA: Increased redundancy for 2x120KVA Lab UPS in

Hyderabad, Avoid additional running cost of 120 kva UPS

TEAM MEMBERS:-Aravind Mamidi Venkat rao ,

A. Suresh, Sivakumar, Durga

Rao

Zero Down time

RESULT AREA

UPS Room - G floor S Q D C P

19th Jun-16

Lab UPS 2 Nos and Work space UPS 3 Nos

inter connected each other such way lab UPS

circuit trips workspace UPS take up the load.

120 Kva 120 Kva

Lab

120

120

120

120 120

Lab

Lab loads are connected with N+1 configuration

There was an incident happened while changeover the

load other UPS , stand by UPS fail to take load resulted

failure of power supply at lab resulted failure of Life cycle

teat.

Idea to Improve in redundancy of UPS for lab loads

Key take away-Always ensure Gemba

before conclusion of decision , consult

all stake holders with the solution to

adopt , Provide confidence and

empower to team

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Disclaimers As Needed (Consult Legal)

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Disclaimers As Needed (Consult Legal)

Energy saving 1.28 lacs/year ( $1128) and one time cost avoidance of Rs 6,00,000($9000) ROI 3.4

years

18

KAIZEN

CAMPUS : HTSL - HYDERABAD KAIZEN AREA :Flight Operation Services area

TARGET

KAIZEN START

KAIZEN FINISH

Sep 2016

BENEFITS: Reduction in

energy consumption by

optimizing UPS capacity.

Key take away : Ensure right

capacity based business dynamics ,

always consult business for right

solution

KAZN.No:05

PROBLEM / PRESENT STATUS: Before COUNTER MEASURE : After

RESULTS:

1)Optimized load , energy saving & cost avoidance

3) Project cost Rs 5.40 lacs

4) One time cost avoidance Rs 6.0 lacs. By using removed UPS to other block.

5) Energy saving Rs 1.28 lacs /annum

6)Reduction in AMC cost first year 2nd year onwards Rs 25000

KAIZEN THEME: Energy saving IDEA: Replacement of overrated UPS 60 kva with 10KVA UPS

TEAM MEMBERS:-

Aravind Vukatal

sona.Lokesh, Venkat rao

,Sivakumar

Reduction in energy

consumption

RESULT AREA – FOC

center S Q D C P

31st Dec-16

Procured 2 Nos of 10 Kva UPS replaced with 60

Kva UPS to keep optimized load.& to achieve

energy saving

60 Kva 60 Kva

FOC

10

kav

a

10

kva

FOC

Constantly UPS load found not more than 3.55 ( 60 Kva)

Observed load never go increase & explored business

dynamics there is no increase of loads in future

Idea implemented on UPS capacity Optimization for FOC

19

Energy Meters online monitoring

UPS Online monitoring DG Online monitoring

Chiller online monitoring

Monitoring , Command Control & Data reporting

20

Monitoring , command control & Data reporting

Location: Power Failure Status 0 Baseline KWH/Month:

Date: Ambient Temperature in °C 28.2 Baseline Unit/SFT/Month:

Allotted Demand in KVA 1550 Target KWH/Month:

Day ConsumptionPrevious day cum

ConsumptionCurrent cumulative Recorded Demand in KVA 810.9 Target Unit/SFT/Month:

EB in KWH 7077 236416 243493 % of demand Used in KVA 52.3 Target Unit/SFT/day:

DG in KWH 0 6944 6944 Power Factor of the day 1 Present day Unit/SFT:

Capacity in KVA Output Voltage % of Load on Transformer Winding Temperature Frequency

T/F#1 1500 408 20.99 50°C 50Hz

T/F#2 1500 0 0.00 0°C 0Hz

T/F#3 NA

T/F#4 NA

T/F#5 NA

Run hours Units Generated HSD Consumption Units/Ltr

DG-1 1055KVA 0.1 0 3 0.00

DG-2 1055KVA 0.1 0 3 0.00

DG-3 380KVA 0.1 0 1 0

DG-4

DG-5

Capacity in TRAverage Condenser

approach

Average Evaporator

approach

Average CHW Temperature

inlet

Average CHW

Temperature Outlet

Chiller #1 120TR NA NA 0 0

Chiller #2 120TR NA NA 0 0

Chiller #3 NA NA NA NA NA

Chiller #4 NA NA NA NA NA

Chiller #5 NA NA NA NA NA

Opening Reading Closing Reading Consumption in

33270.1 33291.048 20.948 0 0 18.272

HYD EMERALD

15.8.2017

Energy Consumption in KWH

Transformer Details

DG Details

CapacityPresent day details

Chiller Details

Water Consumption details in KL

Government Water SupplyTanker Water Consumption Borewell Water Consumption Total Water Consumption

Addition/Deletion of the Loads; MOC details or Any additional information from the Facility

Daily reporting sheet

Total Area app 1200 sq mtrs

21

System Specification No Of Parabolic Troughs (PT) 128 No’s Thermax Solpac -

P60

Reflector area of each PT 6.41 Sq M

Total area of Reflectors 820 Sq M

VAM Capacity 100 TR

Inlet to VAM – 165 Degrees Celsius

Outlet From VAM – 145 Degrees

Celsius

PROCHILL B4K

Project Financial

Total Investment 153.2 lac’s

MNRE Grant /Subsidy 44.28 lac’s

UNDP /MNRE additional sanction 22.50 lacs

Renewable Energy project – Solar Thermal System

Schematic Details -integration of VAM with Air cooled chiller

At peak VAM shares 40%of AC load of building

22

145 ̊C

30 ̊C

12 ̊C9.55 ̊C

Hot water fired VAM

Cooling Tower

Make Up Water

Pump & TankSolar Field of SolPac™ P60

Parabolic Trough : 128 Nos.

Nitrogen Blanketing

165 ̊C

34.6 ̊C

Existing Chilled Water Line

Electric Chiller

AHU

23

THE

GREEN

METRICS

106 tons

11.36 Lakh

INR

$16.968 K

Co2 Mitigation

Monetary Saving

133733.6kWh

Power Saving

Solar thermal System Performance

28

74

5

25

07

0

39

48

9 28

27

2

12

15

76

31

61

9.5

27

57

7

43

43

7.9

31

09

9.2

13

37

33

.6

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

2013 2014 2015 2016 Total

Solar VAM system performance data

Total TR Hours Total KWH

App 106 Tons of Co2 mitigation achieved thru the system since 2013

24Total 269 running hours of Air Cooled chiller avoided since last 2 years

469.06…

631TRH

1106TRH

AC Load sharing TRH on Dt 7th Feb 2017

VAM Air Cooled Total load

VAM

Air CooledChiller

Load sharing details of existing chiller

Months

2015 Actual TR

Hour

2016 Actual TR

Hour

2017 Actual TR

HourTarget TRH

chiller running hrs. avoidance

Jan 5776.5 0 1046 15517Feb 7975.8 5287.4 5505.01 13380Mar 5440.4 5654.8 2442.01 13661Apr 5189.18 4422 0 12246May 4925.27 5103 0 9640Jun 0 0 0 4192Jul 1293 0 0 0

Aug 284.39 0 0Sep 1267.7 0 3708Oct 1856.18 1783 8997Nov 2127 4286 10322Dec 3354 1736 12463Total 39489.42 28272.2 8993.02

25

NABERS

Global SEC

26

Scope 1 Diesel consumed for electricity 0.38 Mt CO2e

Year Fuel consumed in litersEmission factor

(CO2e/unit)Total GHG emission in Mt CO2e

2013 31000 0.00268963 0.08

2014 33583 0.00268963 0.09

2015 39520 0.00268963 0.11

2016 35604 0.00268963 0.10

Scope 2 Indirect Emissions from Electricity 10.09 Mt CO2e

Year Energy consumption in KWHEmission factor

(CO2e/unit)Total GHG emission in Mt CO2e

2013 2542745 0.00082839 2.11

2014 2943785 0.00082839 2.44

2015 3305427 0.00082839 2.74

2016 3384112 0.00082839 2.80

Scope 3 Fleet Vehicle Emissions 0.5 Mt CO2e

Year Fuel consumed in litersEmission factor

(CO2e/unit)GHG emission CO2 (M t CO2e)

2013 44400 0.00269 0.119

2014 44489 0.00269 0.120

2015 46713 0.00269 0.126

2016 49049 0.00269 0.132

GHG Inventorisation

Honeywell Confidential - © 2017 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Employee engagement

27

Safety week quiz

Ergo workout session

Stress management

ERT Training

First aid training

Health talk

Quiz on Energy awareness

Training on energy Awareness

Poster representation to encourage avoid lift usage

Honeywell Confidential - © 2017 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2015 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Organic Waste Converter Process

28

Types of wet waste (NH) in hyderabad: Process optimization

Currently 1 operator working on 8hrs basis.

Expected 100kgs of composting /day.

AMC by Vennar Organic composting

Food waste – 78 kgs/day Garden Waste – 300 kgs/day

Cost saving and ROI

Garden waste generated in site per month approx. - 10 tractor tripsPer trip cost is Rs.850/-Approx. cost per month is 10*850 = 8,500/-Approx. cost per annum is 8,500*12 = 102,000/-Composting Manure generation – 400 kg /month –Rs 10 kg –4000, Per year Rs 48000Investment Rs 8.25 lacsROI – 4.8 years

Benefits of organic waste converters

• Large quantity of solid waste is converted to fertilizer in a very short period. • Fertilizers can be used for gardening in site.• Machine requires less space and the efficiency is high • Manpower and maintenance is very less • This is one of the latest techniques of managing solid waste.

Honeywell Confidential - © 2017 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

Awards and Recognition- HTS India - Hyderabad

29

Best Development Centre for HTS,

Hyderabad by Hyderabad Software

Enterprises Association, India

Solar Thermal System Installation

recognition for best

demonstration project HTS,

Hyderabad campus

Energy Efficient Unit

Certification By CII for HTS,

Hyderabad campus in the year

2016

Honeywell HYD Wins Best

CSR award at 25th HYSEA

Awards;

HTS HYD wins The golden Peacock

Award in the Event of 19th July 2017

World Congress Environmental.

Honeywell Confidential - © 2017 by Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

30

Honeywell is building a smarter, safer,

and more sustainable world.

THAT’S THE POWER OF CONNECTED.

THAT’S THE POWER OF HONEYWELL.

Connected Aircraft | Connected Automobile | Connected Home | Connected BuildingConnected Plant | Connected Supply Chain | Connected Worker

This document contains certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments that we or our management intends, expects, projects, believes or anticipates

will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Such statements are based upon certain assumptions and assessments made by our management in light of their experience and their perception of historical trends, current economic and industry conditions, expected future developments and other factors they believe to be appropriate.

The forward-looking statements included in this release are also subject to a number of material risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to economic, competitive, governmental, and technological factors affecting our operations, markets, products, services and prices. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance,

and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ from those envisaged by such forward-looking statements. We identify the principal risks and uncertainties that affect our performance in our Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.