apollo tyres final)

Upload: mitisha-gaur

Post on 07-Apr-2018

261 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    1/65

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    2/65

    Introduction

    Established in 1976,Appolo Tyres Ltd. is Indias leadingtyres manufacturer with operation in three continents andheadquarter at Gurgaon .

    Key people of the firm are Onkar S Kanwar as CMD andNeeraj R S Kanwar as JMD and COO.

    Traded in India on the Bombay, National and Kochi StockExchanges, with 61% of shares held by the public,government entities, banks and financial institutions

    Manpower: Over 10,000 employees based across India,

    Southern Africa and Europe

    Product portfolio: The entire range of passenger car,SUV, MUV, light truck, truck-bus, agriculture,industrial

    and off-the-road tyres; retreading material, retreaded

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    3/65

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    4/65

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    5/65

    Key markets of operation: India is the largestmarket accounting for nearly 70% of revenues.Exportsreach 70+ countries from the threedomestic markets of India, Europe and South

    Africa Turnover: FY09 Rs 49.8 billion / US$ 1.1 billion /

    Euro 754 million (March 31, 2009, exchangerates)

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    6/65

    Financial StatementAnalysis

    (2004-2009)

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    7/65

    On Proper analysis and interpretation, financialstatements can provide valuable insights into afirms performance.

    There are four basic ways of analysing financialstatements

    Ratio analysis

    Comparative analysis Common size statement analysis

    Du Pont analysis.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    8/65

    1. RATIO ANALYSIS

    Broadly financial ratios are categorised into fivecategories

    Liquidity ratios Leverage ratios

    Turnover ratios

    Profitability ratios

    Valuation ratios

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    9/65

    1. Liquidity Ratio :Liquidity refers to the ability of afirm to meet current/short-term obligations when

    they become due for payment .It is generally based on current assets and current

    liabilities.

    i) Current Ratio : it is defined as Current Assets.

    Current Liabilities

    Higher the ratio better is the liquidity position of thefirm.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    10/65

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Current ratio

    Current ratio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    11/65

    Comment:-

    From the graph it is clear that firm is able to meetcurrent obligations and the safety of funds ofshort term creditors is good

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    12/65

    ii) Acid Test Ratio (Quick Ratio) :defined asQuick Assets .

    Current Liabilities

    Quick assets refer to those which can be convertedto cash immediately or at a short notice without

    diminition of value.

    Quick Assets are CA excluding inventories,WIP,andpre-paid expenses.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    13/65

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Quick Ratio

    Quick Ratio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    14/65

    Comment:-

    From the graph we can say that firms quick ratio

    was beat in 2005 and then it declined to 0.6 in2008 but recovered to 0.7 in 2009.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    15/65

    2. Leverage Ratios (Capital Structure) :

    The first type of leverage ratio is based on therelationship between borrowed funds & owners

    capital.

    These ratios are computed from balance sheets,Such as

    Debt-equity ratio

    Debt-asset ratio

    Equity-asset ratio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    16/65

    i) Debt-Equity Ratio : it shows the relative contributions

    of creditors and owners. It is defined asD / E ratio = Debt

    Equity

    It is the ratio of the amount invested by outsiders to

    the amount invested by the owners of business.Lower the ratio higher will be the margin of safety for

    creditors.

    A high debt-equity ratio will lead to inflexibility in the

    operation of the firm and frequent interference will be therefrom creditors side.

    But shareholders will be benefited with high debt-equity ratio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    17/65

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Debt-Equity Ratio

    Debt-Equity Ratio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    18/65

    Comments:-

    Since the ratio is around 0.8 the long termlenders are more secure which is good for longterm position of the firm.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    19/65

    ii) Debt-Asset Ratio :it measures the extent towhich borrowed funds support the firms assets.

    It is defined as

    . Debt .

    Assets

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    20/65

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Debt Asset Ratio

    Debt Asset Ratio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    21/65

    Comment:-

    Debt-assset ratio of the firm is around 0.25 whichindicates use of lower debt in financing the assetswhich means a larger safety margin for lender.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    22/65

    iii) Equity-Asset Ratio :it measures the extent towhich owners funds support the firms assets. It

    isdefined as

    Equity-Asset Ratio= Equity

    Assets

    Here equity means equity capital of the firm (i.e.,net worth).

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    23/65

    0

    0.050.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.250.3

    0.35

    0.4

    0.45

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Equity-Asset Ratio

    Equity-Asset Ratio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    24/65

    Comment:- The equity-asset ratio is very less so the firm is

    more dependent on external sources of financeand it is a dangerous signal for long term leadersas it indicates a lower level of safety available to

    them.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    25/65

    The second category of leverage ratios arecoverage ratios.

    These ratios are computed from informationavailable in the profit and loss account.

    These are important because, in the ordinarycourse of business,the claims of creditors are not

    met out of the sale proceeds of the permanentassets.

    The coverage ratio measure the relationshipbetween what is normally available from

    operations of the firm and the claims of theoutsiders.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    26/65

    Important coverage ratios are

    i) Interest Coverage Ratio : it is also known astime interest earned ratio. It is defined as

    EBIT (Earning before interest and taxes)

    Interest

    This ratio measures the debt servicing capacity ofa firm.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    27/65

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Interest Coverage Ratio

    Interest CoverageRatio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    28/65

    Comment:- In the year 2008 the ratio is satisfactory which

    implies assured payment of interest to them butfor other years ratio is low and it is a dangersignal that firm is using excessive debt

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    29/65

    3. Turnover / Activity / Asset Management Ratio:

    It measures how efficiently the assets areemployed by the firm.

    These ratios are also called as efficiency ratios.

    The efficiency of assets would be reflected in thespeed with which it is converted into sales. Thegreater is the rate of turnover, the efficient is theutilization / management.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    30/65

    i) Inventory (Stock) Turnover Ratio :itmeasures how fast the inventory is movingthrough the firm and generating sales. It is

    defined as

    COGS

    Average inventory

    Cost of goods sold may be obtained by deductinggross profit from net sales.

    Average inventory may be calculated as

    - average of opening stocks of a year ; or -(opening stock + closing stock) / 2

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    31/65

    0

    12

    3

    4

    56

    7

    8

    9

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Inventory Turnover Ratio

    Inventory TurnoverRatio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    32/65

    Comment:- Higher the ratio better it is as it indicates that

    stock is selling quickly. However this was thecase in the year 2004 only. After that the ratio isdeclining.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    33/65

    ii) Debtors (Receivables) Turnover Ratio :itshows how many times accounts receivables(debtors) turn over during the year. It is defined

    as

    . Net Credit Sales .

    Average accounts receivables(i.e., Av. debtors + Av. B/R)

    The denominators can be calculated as in the

    case of inventory turnover ratio.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    34/65

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Debtors Turnover Ratio

    Debtors TurnoverRatio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    35/65

    Comment:- From the graph it is clear that the firm has a

    higher debtors turnover ratio in the subsequentyears which is good for the firm as it indicates thatamount from debtors is being collected more

    quickly.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    36/65

    iii) Average Collection Period :this is anotherway of measuring the liquidity of a firms debtor. It

    represents the number days worth of credit sales

    that is locked in debtors (a/c receivables).It is defined as

    . Average debtors .Average daily credit sales OR

    Months (days) in a year

    Debtors turnover

    Normally, higher the ratio better is the creditmanagement policy of the firm.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    37/65

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    2530

    35

    40

    45

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Average Collection Period(in days)

    Average CollectionPeriod(in days)

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    38/65

    Comment:-

    From the graph it is clear that the creditmanagement policy of the firm has been goodover the years.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    39/65

    4. Profitabilty ratios:

    i) Profit margin ratios:

    It measures the relationship between profit and sales. Differenttypes of profit margin ratios are:

    a) Gross Profit Margin Ratio:gross profit means difference

    between net sales and cost ofgoods sold. It is defined as

    Gross ProfitNet Sales

    This ratio shows the margin left after meeting manufacturingcost . It measures efficiency of production as well as pricing.Higher the ratio, better is the condition.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    40/65

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Gross Profit Ratio(in %)

    Gross Profit Ratio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    41/65

    Comment:-

    Gross profit margin ratio of the firm is around 40%which indicates good management, low cost ofproduction and higher sales.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    42/65

    b) Net Profit Margin Ratio :it measures the relationship between

    net profit and sales of the firm. It can

    be measured in two ways

    Operating profit ratio = EBITSales

    Net profit ratio = EAT

    Sales

    This ratio shows the earnings left for shareholders (both equity and

    preference) as a percentage of net sales.

    It measures the overall efficiency of the production, administration,

    selling, financing, pricing and tax management.

    Higher the ratio, better for owners.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    43/65

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    56

    7

    8

    910

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Operating ProfitRatio

    Net Profit Ratio

    Net profit margin ratio(in%)

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    44/65

    Comment:-

    We can see that the net profit margin ratio is fairlygood it would ensure adequate return to theowners as well as enable a firm to withstandadverse economic conditions when selling price is

    declining ,cost of production is rising and demandof product is falling.

    ii) Rate of return ratios :

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    45/65

    ii) Rate of return ratios :

    It reflects the relationship between profit and investment.The important ratios are

    a) Return on total asset (ROTA):also called as return oninvestment (ROI). Defined

    as

    Net profit after taxes (PAT / EAT)Average total asset

    It shows how efficiently the asset of the firm is utilized.

    Higher the ratio, better utilization of asset will be.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    46/65

    0

    12

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    ROTA( in %)

    ROTA( in %)

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    47/65

    Comment:-

    As from graph ROTA is high implies the netearnings of owners and intrest for creditors is highwhich indicate strong financial position of thecompany.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    48/65

    b) Return on capital employed (ROCE) :similar to ROTA except

    in one respect. Here profits

    are related to total capital

    employed. Defined as

    Net profit after tax (EAT) OR [ EAT + Interest .

    Av. total capital employed Av. total capital employed

    Capital employed is equal to long term liabilities + ownersequity.

    OR it is equal to net working capital + fixed assets.

    Higher the ratio, more efficient is the use of capital employed.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    49/65

    0

    24

    6

    8

    1012

    14

    16

    18

    20

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    ROCE( in %)

    ROCE( in %)

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    50/65

    Comment:-

    Good value of ROCE implies efficient use ofcapital employed.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    51/65

    c) Earning power ratio:it measures operatingprofitability. It is defined as

    Profit before interest and taxes

    Average total assets

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    52/65

    0

    12

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Earning power ratio

    Earning power ratio

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    53/65

    Index Analysis :

    In index analysis, the items in comparative financialstatements(balance sheets and income statements)

    are expressed as an index relative to the base year.

    All items in the base year naturally assume a valueof 100.

    INDEX ANALYSIS

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    54/65

    Liabilities 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Net worth 100 99.83226 105.2947 153.3075 195.632 224.1501

    reserves and surplus 100 99.82085 105.6548 155.5014 200.2714 230.4521

    total borrowings 100 129.0453 177.9763 198.1206 154.4078 211.3713

    current liabilities and

    provisions 100 86.39497 129.6276 226.9617 239.4863 224.4303

    deferred tax liability 100 108.8622 116.7694 202.0025 203.2656 221.6266

    total liabilities 100 104.084 132.252 189.987 198.2292 220.4519

    INDEX ANALYSIS

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    55/65

    Assets 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    gross fixed

    assets 100 117.8724 126.183 186.6214 188.2925 235.2732

    net fixed

    assets 100 116.6882 121.3308 181.2553 174.5562 225.4332

    investments 100 19.32059 3.043171 38.28733 36.73036 33.68719

    deferred tax

    assets 100 101.8018 381.982 1198.198 1007.658 975.6757

    current

    assets 100 94.20742 143.9649 198.1923 220.7464 217.4909

    total assets 100 104.084 132.252 189.9907 198.2292 220.4519

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    56/65

    Common Size Statement Analysis

    In common size analysis, the items in the balancesheet are expressed as percentage of totalassets and the items in the income statement areexpressed as percentage of total sales.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    57/65

    COMMON SIZE ANALYSIS

    Liabilities 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Net worth 15.95496 15.40224 13.0892 13.22637 15.7135 16.10502

    reserves

    and surplus 14.93901 14.41983 12.29765 12.56138 15.06184 15.50349

    totalborrowings 11.1667 13.93427 15.48452 11.96288 8.68023 10.62913

    current

    liabilities

    and

    provisions 12.80218 10.69521 12.92982 15.7115 15.43483 12.93874

    deferredtax liability 2.580416 2.716339 2.347629 2.818562 2.640527 2.575362

    total

    liabilities 42.55673 42.83211 43.85118 43.71931 42.46908 42.24826

    100 100 100 100 100 100

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    58/65

    Assets 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    gross fixed

    assets 25.52693 27.95491 24.63579 25.17913 24.55287 26.77383

    net fixed

    assets 17.56341 19.04071 16.29848 16.82598 15.66083 17.65087

    investments 0.327783 0.058837 0.007629 0.066332 0.061501 0.049226

    deferred tax

    assets 0.051499 0.048708 0.150455 0.326142 0.265082 0.223997

    currentassets 19.2747 16.87019 21.22323 20.19088 21.73461 18.68822

    total assets 37.25567 36.02664 37.68441 37.41154 37.7251 36.61386

    100 100 100 100 100 100

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    59/65

    SWOT Analysis

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    60/65

    Strengths:-

    Continued market leadership in the dominant industry

    segment of truck and bus tyres

    Global presence with the acquisition of Apollo Tyres

    South Africa (Pvt) Ltd. (Formerly known as DunlopTyres International (Pvt) Ltd.)

    Extensive distribution network in India and South

    Africa

    Strongbrand recall in a price sensitive Indian market Responsive to changes in market conditions and

    product profiles

    Globalquality standards, international process and

    system certifications

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    61/65

    High usage of information technology systems tohasten the flow of information and leverageopportunities across 140 locations in India

    Dynamic and progressive leadership, willing to

    implement change Globalsourcing of raw materials

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    62/65

    Weakness:-

    No presence in two and three-wheeler segments

    Capital-intensive business :-

    A business is capital-intensive if it requires heavycapital investment in buying assets relative to thelevel of sales or profits that those assets cangenerate.

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    63/65

    Opportunities:-

    Leadership position in the commercial vehicle

    segment will enable the Company to leveragenew and related business opportunities

    New product segments like Truck/Bus Radial(TBR), Off The Road tyres (OTR), retreading andallied automotive services

    Growth in overseas markets like Europe

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    64/65

    Threats:-

    Imports from neighbouring countries atcompetitive prices

    Raw material price volatility ( frequent changes in

    price of raw materials).

  • 8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)

    65/65