apollo tyres final)
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
1/65
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
2/65
Introduction
Established in 1976,Appolo Tyres Ltd. is Indias leadingtyres manufacturer with operation in three continents andheadquarter at Gurgaon .
Key people of the firm are Onkar S Kanwar as CMD andNeeraj R S Kanwar as JMD and COO.
Traded in India on the Bombay, National and Kochi StockExchanges, with 61% of shares held by the public,government entities, banks and financial institutions
Manpower: Over 10,000 employees based across India,
Southern Africa and Europe
Product portfolio: The entire range of passenger car,SUV, MUV, light truck, truck-bus, agriculture,industrial
and off-the-road tyres; retreading material, retreaded
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
3/65
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
4/65
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
5/65
Key markets of operation: India is the largestmarket accounting for nearly 70% of revenues.Exportsreach 70+ countries from the threedomestic markets of India, Europe and South
Africa Turnover: FY09 Rs 49.8 billion / US$ 1.1 billion /
Euro 754 million (March 31, 2009, exchangerates)
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
6/65
Financial StatementAnalysis
(2004-2009)
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
7/65
On Proper analysis and interpretation, financialstatements can provide valuable insights into afirms performance.
There are four basic ways of analysing financialstatements
Ratio analysis
Comparative analysis Common size statement analysis
Du Pont analysis.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
8/65
1. RATIO ANALYSIS
Broadly financial ratios are categorised into fivecategories
Liquidity ratios Leverage ratios
Turnover ratios
Profitability ratios
Valuation ratios
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
9/65
1. Liquidity Ratio :Liquidity refers to the ability of afirm to meet current/short-term obligations when
they become due for payment .It is generally based on current assets and current
liabilities.
i) Current Ratio : it is defined as Current Assets.
Current Liabilities
Higher the ratio better is the liquidity position of thefirm.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
10/65
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Current ratio
Current ratio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
11/65
Comment:-
From the graph it is clear that firm is able to meetcurrent obligations and the safety of funds ofshort term creditors is good
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
12/65
ii) Acid Test Ratio (Quick Ratio) :defined asQuick Assets .
Current Liabilities
Quick assets refer to those which can be convertedto cash immediately or at a short notice without
diminition of value.
Quick Assets are CA excluding inventories,WIP,andpre-paid expenses.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
13/65
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Quick Ratio
Quick Ratio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
14/65
Comment:-
From the graph we can say that firms quick ratio
was beat in 2005 and then it declined to 0.6 in2008 but recovered to 0.7 in 2009.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
15/65
2. Leverage Ratios (Capital Structure) :
The first type of leverage ratio is based on therelationship between borrowed funds & owners
capital.
These ratios are computed from balance sheets,Such as
Debt-equity ratio
Debt-asset ratio
Equity-asset ratio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
16/65
i) Debt-Equity Ratio : it shows the relative contributions
of creditors and owners. It is defined asD / E ratio = Debt
Equity
It is the ratio of the amount invested by outsiders to
the amount invested by the owners of business.Lower the ratio higher will be the margin of safety for
creditors.
A high debt-equity ratio will lead to inflexibility in the
operation of the firm and frequent interference will be therefrom creditors side.
But shareholders will be benefited with high debt-equity ratio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
17/65
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Debt-Equity Ratio
Debt-Equity Ratio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
18/65
Comments:-
Since the ratio is around 0.8 the long termlenders are more secure which is good for longterm position of the firm.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
19/65
ii) Debt-Asset Ratio :it measures the extent towhich borrowed funds support the firms assets.
It is defined as
. Debt .
Assets
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
20/65
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Debt Asset Ratio
Debt Asset Ratio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
21/65
Comment:-
Debt-assset ratio of the firm is around 0.25 whichindicates use of lower debt in financing the assetswhich means a larger safety margin for lender.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
22/65
iii) Equity-Asset Ratio :it measures the extent towhich owners funds support the firms assets. It
isdefined as
Equity-Asset Ratio= Equity
Assets
Here equity means equity capital of the firm (i.e.,net worth).
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
23/65
0
0.050.1
0.15
0.2
0.250.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Equity-Asset Ratio
Equity-Asset Ratio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
24/65
Comment:- The equity-asset ratio is very less so the firm is
more dependent on external sources of financeand it is a dangerous signal for long term leadersas it indicates a lower level of safety available to
them.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
25/65
The second category of leverage ratios arecoverage ratios.
These ratios are computed from informationavailable in the profit and loss account.
These are important because, in the ordinarycourse of business,the claims of creditors are not
met out of the sale proceeds of the permanentassets.
The coverage ratio measure the relationshipbetween what is normally available from
operations of the firm and the claims of theoutsiders.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
26/65
Important coverage ratios are
i) Interest Coverage Ratio : it is also known astime interest earned ratio. It is defined as
EBIT (Earning before interest and taxes)
Interest
This ratio measures the debt servicing capacity ofa firm.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
27/65
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Interest Coverage Ratio
Interest CoverageRatio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
28/65
Comment:- In the year 2008 the ratio is satisfactory which
implies assured payment of interest to them butfor other years ratio is low and it is a dangersignal that firm is using excessive debt
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
29/65
3. Turnover / Activity / Asset Management Ratio:
It measures how efficiently the assets areemployed by the firm.
These ratios are also called as efficiency ratios.
The efficiency of assets would be reflected in thespeed with which it is converted into sales. Thegreater is the rate of turnover, the efficient is theutilization / management.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
30/65
i) Inventory (Stock) Turnover Ratio :itmeasures how fast the inventory is movingthrough the firm and generating sales. It is
defined as
COGS
Average inventory
Cost of goods sold may be obtained by deductinggross profit from net sales.
Average inventory may be calculated as
- average of opening stocks of a year ; or -(opening stock + closing stock) / 2
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
31/65
0
12
3
4
56
7
8
9
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Inventory TurnoverRatio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
32/65
Comment:- Higher the ratio better it is as it indicates that
stock is selling quickly. However this was thecase in the year 2004 only. After that the ratio isdeclining.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
33/65
ii) Debtors (Receivables) Turnover Ratio :itshows how many times accounts receivables(debtors) turn over during the year. It is defined
as
. Net Credit Sales .
Average accounts receivables(i.e., Av. debtors + Av. B/R)
The denominators can be calculated as in the
case of inventory turnover ratio.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
34/65
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Debtors Turnover Ratio
Debtors TurnoverRatio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
35/65
Comment:- From the graph it is clear that the firm has a
higher debtors turnover ratio in the subsequentyears which is good for the firm as it indicates thatamount from debtors is being collected more
quickly.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
36/65
iii) Average Collection Period :this is anotherway of measuring the liquidity of a firms debtor. It
represents the number days worth of credit sales
that is locked in debtors (a/c receivables).It is defined as
. Average debtors .Average daily credit sales OR
Months (days) in a year
Debtors turnover
Normally, higher the ratio better is the creditmanagement policy of the firm.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
37/65
0
5
10
15
20
2530
35
40
45
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Average Collection Period(in days)
Average CollectionPeriod(in days)
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
38/65
Comment:-
From the graph it is clear that the creditmanagement policy of the firm has been goodover the years.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
39/65
4. Profitabilty ratios:
i) Profit margin ratios:
It measures the relationship between profit and sales. Differenttypes of profit margin ratios are:
a) Gross Profit Margin Ratio:gross profit means difference
between net sales and cost ofgoods sold. It is defined as
Gross ProfitNet Sales
This ratio shows the margin left after meeting manufacturingcost . It measures efficiency of production as well as pricing.Higher the ratio, better is the condition.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
40/65
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Gross Profit Ratio(in %)
Gross Profit Ratio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
41/65
Comment:-
Gross profit margin ratio of the firm is around 40%which indicates good management, low cost ofproduction and higher sales.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
42/65
b) Net Profit Margin Ratio :it measures the relationship between
net profit and sales of the firm. It can
be measured in two ways
Operating profit ratio = EBITSales
Net profit ratio = EAT
Sales
This ratio shows the earnings left for shareholders (both equity and
preference) as a percentage of net sales.
It measures the overall efficiency of the production, administration,
selling, financing, pricing and tax management.
Higher the ratio, better for owners.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
43/65
0
1
2
3
4
56
7
8
910
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Operating ProfitRatio
Net Profit Ratio
Net profit margin ratio(in%)
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
44/65
Comment:-
We can see that the net profit margin ratio is fairlygood it would ensure adequate return to theowners as well as enable a firm to withstandadverse economic conditions when selling price is
declining ,cost of production is rising and demandof product is falling.
ii) Rate of return ratios :
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
45/65
ii) Rate of return ratios :
It reflects the relationship between profit and investment.The important ratios are
a) Return on total asset (ROTA):also called as return oninvestment (ROI). Defined
as
Net profit after taxes (PAT / EAT)Average total asset
It shows how efficiently the asset of the firm is utilized.
Higher the ratio, better utilization of asset will be.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
46/65
0
12
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
ROTA( in %)
ROTA( in %)
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
47/65
Comment:-
As from graph ROTA is high implies the netearnings of owners and intrest for creditors is highwhich indicate strong financial position of thecompany.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
48/65
b) Return on capital employed (ROCE) :similar to ROTA except
in one respect. Here profits
are related to total capital
employed. Defined as
Net profit after tax (EAT) OR [ EAT + Interest .
Av. total capital employed Av. total capital employed
Capital employed is equal to long term liabilities + ownersequity.
OR it is equal to net working capital + fixed assets.
Higher the ratio, more efficient is the use of capital employed.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
49/65
0
24
6
8
1012
14
16
18
20
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
ROCE( in %)
ROCE( in %)
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
50/65
Comment:-
Good value of ROCE implies efficient use ofcapital employed.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
51/65
c) Earning power ratio:it measures operatingprofitability. It is defined as
Profit before interest and taxes
Average total assets
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
52/65
0
12
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Earning power ratio
Earning power ratio
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
53/65
Index Analysis :
In index analysis, the items in comparative financialstatements(balance sheets and income statements)
are expressed as an index relative to the base year.
All items in the base year naturally assume a valueof 100.
INDEX ANALYSIS
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
54/65
Liabilities 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Net worth 100 99.83226 105.2947 153.3075 195.632 224.1501
reserves and surplus 100 99.82085 105.6548 155.5014 200.2714 230.4521
total borrowings 100 129.0453 177.9763 198.1206 154.4078 211.3713
current liabilities and
provisions 100 86.39497 129.6276 226.9617 239.4863 224.4303
deferred tax liability 100 108.8622 116.7694 202.0025 203.2656 221.6266
total liabilities 100 104.084 132.252 189.987 198.2292 220.4519
INDEX ANALYSIS
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
55/65
Assets 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
gross fixed
assets 100 117.8724 126.183 186.6214 188.2925 235.2732
net fixed
assets 100 116.6882 121.3308 181.2553 174.5562 225.4332
investments 100 19.32059 3.043171 38.28733 36.73036 33.68719
deferred tax
assets 100 101.8018 381.982 1198.198 1007.658 975.6757
current
assets 100 94.20742 143.9649 198.1923 220.7464 217.4909
total assets 100 104.084 132.252 189.9907 198.2292 220.4519
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
56/65
Common Size Statement Analysis
In common size analysis, the items in the balancesheet are expressed as percentage of totalassets and the items in the income statement areexpressed as percentage of total sales.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
57/65
COMMON SIZE ANALYSIS
Liabilities 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Net worth 15.95496 15.40224 13.0892 13.22637 15.7135 16.10502
reserves
and surplus 14.93901 14.41983 12.29765 12.56138 15.06184 15.50349
totalborrowings 11.1667 13.93427 15.48452 11.96288 8.68023 10.62913
current
liabilities
and
provisions 12.80218 10.69521 12.92982 15.7115 15.43483 12.93874
deferredtax liability 2.580416 2.716339 2.347629 2.818562 2.640527 2.575362
total
liabilities 42.55673 42.83211 43.85118 43.71931 42.46908 42.24826
100 100 100 100 100 100
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
58/65
Assets 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
gross fixed
assets 25.52693 27.95491 24.63579 25.17913 24.55287 26.77383
net fixed
assets 17.56341 19.04071 16.29848 16.82598 15.66083 17.65087
investments 0.327783 0.058837 0.007629 0.066332 0.061501 0.049226
deferred tax
assets 0.051499 0.048708 0.150455 0.326142 0.265082 0.223997
currentassets 19.2747 16.87019 21.22323 20.19088 21.73461 18.68822
total assets 37.25567 36.02664 37.68441 37.41154 37.7251 36.61386
100 100 100 100 100 100
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
59/65
SWOT Analysis
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
60/65
Strengths:-
Continued market leadership in the dominant industry
segment of truck and bus tyres
Global presence with the acquisition of Apollo Tyres
South Africa (Pvt) Ltd. (Formerly known as DunlopTyres International (Pvt) Ltd.)
Extensive distribution network in India and South
Africa
Strongbrand recall in a price sensitive Indian market Responsive to changes in market conditions and
product profiles
Globalquality standards, international process and
system certifications
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
61/65
High usage of information technology systems tohasten the flow of information and leverageopportunities across 140 locations in India
Dynamic and progressive leadership, willing to
implement change Globalsourcing of raw materials
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
62/65
Weakness:-
No presence in two and three-wheeler segments
Capital-intensive business :-
A business is capital-intensive if it requires heavycapital investment in buying assets relative to thelevel of sales or profits that those assets cangenerate.
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
63/65
Opportunities:-
Leadership position in the commercial vehicle
segment will enable the Company to leveragenew and related business opportunities
New product segments like Truck/Bus Radial(TBR), Off The Road tyres (OTR), retreading andallied automotive services
Growth in overseas markets like Europe
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
64/65
Threats:-
Imports from neighbouring countries atcompetitive prices
Raw material price volatility ( frequent changes in
price of raw materials).
-
8/4/2019 Apollo Tyres Final)
65/65