annual meeting presentation 06.17.16
TRANSCRIPT
By: Anirban BasuSage Policy Group, Inc.
June 17th, 2016
The Economist Who Loved Me
On Behalf of
Susquehanna Workforce Network, Inc. Annual Meeting 2016
The World is Not (Growing) Enough
*1999: Pierce Brosnan; Sophie Marceau
BrazilMexico
Latin America & the CaribbeanMiddle East, North Africa, Afghanistan, & Pakistan
India (1)China
Emerging & developing AsiaRussia
Emerging & developing EuropeSub-Saharan Africa
Emerging market & developing economiesUnited States
AustraliaCanada
United KingdomJapanSpain
ItalyGermany
FranceEuro area
Advanced economies
-6.0% -4.0% -2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0%-3.8%
2.4%-0.5%
3.1%7.5%
6.5%6.4%
-1.8%3.5%
3.0%4.1%
2.4%2.5%
1.5%1.9%
0.5%2.6%
1.0%1.5%
1.1%1.5%1.9%
Annual % Change
Estimated Growth in Output by Select Global Areas2016 Projected
Notes: 1. For India, data and forecasts are presented on a fiscal year basis and GDP from 2011 onward is based on GDP at market prices with fiscal year 2011/12 as a base year. 2. For World Output, the quarterly estimates and projections account for approximately 90 percent of annual world output at purchasing-power-parity weights. For Emerging Market and Developing Economies, the quarterly estimates and projections account for approximately 80 percent of annual emerging market and developing economies’ output at purchasing-power-parity weights.
2016 Proj. Global Output Growth: 3.2%Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2016.
May-01Jan
-02
Sep-0
2
May-03Jan
-04
Sep-0
4
May-05Jan
-06
Sep-0
6
May-07Jan
-08
Sep-0
8
May-09Jan
-10
Sep-1
0
May-11Jan
-12
Sep-1
2
May-13
Jan-14
Sep-1
4
May-15Jan
-16$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$/B
arre
l
May 2016:$46.79 /Bar-
rel
NYMEX Crude Oil Future Prices in U.S. DollarsMay 2001 through May 2016
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration
World Oil Demand Growth2007Q1 through 2016Q1*
Source: The World Bank; International Energy Agency
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0 Other Non-OECDOECDChina
mb/
d, g
row
th y
ear
over
yea
r
*2016Q1 is an estimate
Moneypenny—Metal Price IndicesMay 2007 through May 2016
Source: The World Bank
US$ NominalBase metals include aluminum, copper, lead, nickel, tin and zinc.Precious metals include gold, platinum, and silver.
May-07
Jan-08
Sep-08
May-09
Jan-10
Sep-10
May-11
Jan-12
Sep-12
May-13
Jan-14
Sep-14
May-15
Jan-16
25
45
65
85
105
125
145
165
Base Metals
Iron Ore
Precious Metals
2010
=10
0
Source: Quandl.com
Baltic Dry IndexJune 2009 through June 2016
Jun-09
Oct-09
Feb-10
Jun-10
Oct-10
Feb-11
Jun-11
Oct-11
Feb-12
Jun-12
Oct-12
Feb-13
Jun-13
Oct-13
Feb-14
Jun-14
Oct-14
Feb-15
Jun-15
Oct-15
Feb-16
Jun-16
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
Jan. 4, 1985: 1,000
June 10th 610
The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) is a measure of the price of shipping major raw materials such as metals, grains, and fossil fuels by sea. The BDI is a composite of 3 sub-indices, each covering a different carrier size: Capesize, Panamax, and Supramax.
Quantum of Solace
*2008: Daniel Craig; Olga Kurylenko
1990Q1 1993Q1 1996Q1 1999Q1 2002Q1 2005Q1 2008Q1 2011Q1 2014Q1-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Perc
ent
Cha
nge
from
Pre
cedi
ng P
erio
d (S
AAR
)
2016Q1: +0.8%
Gross Domestic Product1990Q1 through 2016Q1*
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis * 2nd Estimate
Contributions to GDP Growth by Component 2015Q2 – 2016Q1*
Personal Consumption
Government Spending
Net Exports Gross Invest-ment
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.02.4
0.50.2
0.9
2.0
0.3
-0.3 -0.1
1.7
0.0
-0.1 -0.2
1.29
0.20
-0.21-0.45
Q2-15 Q3-15 Q4-15
SAA
R (
%)
GDP0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
3.9
2.0
1.4
0.8
Perc
ent
Cha
nge
from
Pre
cedi
ng P
erio
d (S
AAR
)
2016Q1: +0.8%
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis * 2nd Estimate
May-02
Jan-03
Sep-0
3
May-04
Jan-05
Sep-0
5
May-06
Jan-07
Sep-0
7
May-08
Jan-09
Sep-0
9
May-10
Jan-11
Sep-1
1
May-12
Jan-13
Sep-1
3
May-14
Jan-15
Sep-1
5
May-16
-1,000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
Thou
sand
s
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
May 2016: +38K
Net Change in U.S. Jobs, BLSMay 2002 through May 2016
National Nonfarm Employmentby Industry SectorMay 2015 v. May 2016
Mining and Logging
Manufacturing
Information
Other Services
Government
Financial Activities
Construction
Leisure and Hospitality
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities
Professional and Business Services
Education and Health Services
-300 -100 100 300 500 700 900
-129
-39
4
63
101
157
219
394
425
525
678Chart Title
Thousands, SA
All told 2,398K Jobs gained
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Maryland Nonfarm Employmentby Industry Sector Groups (SA)April 2015 v. April 2016Absolute Change
Information
Government
Manufacturing
Financial Activities
Other Services
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities
Education and Health Services
Professional and Business Services
Mining, Logging, and Construction
Leisure and Hospitality
-5,000 0 5,000 10,000 15,000
-1,000
-700
2,000
3,000
3,300
6,300
8,900
9,100
10,500
14,500
MD Total: +55.9K; +2.1%US Total (SA): +2,633K; +1.9%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
*According to the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) series MD added 53,266 jobs between April 2015 and April 2016.
Government
Information
Financial Activities
Other Services
Manufacturing
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities
Mining, Logging, and Construction
Education and Health Services
Leisure and Hospitality
Professional and Business Services
-5,000 0 5,000 10,000 15,000
-2,100
200
400
1,200
1,600
2,100
3,300
3,800
7,200
12,500Chart Title
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson MSA Nonfarm Employmentby Industry Sector Groups (NSA)April 2015 v. April 2016Absolute Change
Baltimore MSA Total: +30.2K; +2.2%MD Total (SA): +55.9K; +2.1%US Total (SA): +2,633K; +1.9%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Apr-02
Apr-03
Apr-04
Apr-05
Apr-06
Apr-07
Apr-08
Apr-09
Apr-10
Apr-11
Apr-12
Apr-13
Apr-14
Apr-15
Apr-16
-2,500
-1,500
-500
500
1,500
2,500
12-M
onth
Net
Cha
nge
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Cecil County EmploymentApril 2002 – April 2016 (NSA)
April 2015 v. April 2016: +1,341; +2.7%
Apr-02
Apr-03
Apr-04
Apr-05
Apr-06
Apr-07
Apr-08
Apr-09
Apr-10
Apr-11
Apr-12
Apr-13
Apr-14
Apr-15
Apr-16
-5,000
-4,000
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
12-M
onth
Net
Cha
nge
April 2015 v. April 2016:
+1,791; +1.4%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Harford County EmploymentApril 2002 – April 2016 (NSA)
Employment Growth, U.S. States (SA) April 2015 v. April 2016 Percent Change
RANK STATE % RANK STATE % RANK STATE %
1 IDAHO 3.8 17 MARYLAND 2.1 32 MONTANA 1.32 DELAWARE 3.7 17 MASSACHUSETTS 2.1 32 NEW HAMPSHIRE 1.33 OREGON 3.5 20 HAWAII 2.0 32 OHIO 1.34 UTAH 3.4 21 KENTUCKY 1.9 38 CONNECTICUT 1.25 GEORGIA 3.3 21 VERMONT 1.9 39 ILLINOIS 1.15 WASHINGTON 3.3 23 INDIANA 1.6 39 RHODE ISLAND 1.17 FLORIDA 3.2 23 NEW JERSEY 1.6 41 SOUTH DAKOTA 1.08 ARIZONA 3.1 23 TEXAS 1.6 42 PENNSYLVANIA 0.99 TENNESSEE 2.9 26 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1.5 43 MAINE 0.5
10 CALIFORNIA 2.8 26 NEBRASKA 1.5 44 NEW MEXICO 0.211 COLORADO 2.7 26 WISCONSIN 1.5 45 KANSAS 0.011 SOUTH CAROLINA 2.7 29 MINNESOTA 1.4 46 OKLAHOMA -0.113 NEVADA 2.6 29 MISSISSIPPI 1.4 47 LOUISIANA -0.614 MICHIGAN 2.5 29 NEW YORK 1.4 47 WEST VIRGINIA -0.615 NORTH CAROLINA 2.3 32 ALABAMA 1.3 49 ALASKA -1.016 VIRGINIA 2.2 32 IOWA 1.3 50 WYOMING -3.717 ARKANSAS 2.1 32 MISSOURI 1.3 51 NORTH DAKOTA -3.8
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
U.S. Year-over-year Percent ChangeApril: +1.9%May: +1.7%
Source: Moody’s Economy
Recession Watchas of March 2016
U.S. Unemployment Rate April: 5.0%May: 4.7%
Unemployment Rates, U.S. States (SA) April 2016
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
RANK STATE % RAN
K STATE % RANK STATE %
1 SOUTH DAKOTA 2.5 16 MONTANA 4.2 32 RHODE ISLAND 5.32 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.6 19 MISSOURI 4.3 36 NORTH CAROLINA 5.43 NEBRASKA 3.0 19 TENNESSEE 4.3 37 ARIZONA 5.54 COLORADO 3.1 21 TEXAS 4.4 37 GEORGIA 5.55 HAWAII 3.2 21 WISCONSIN 4.4 37 WYOMING 5.55 NORTH DAKOTA 3.2 23 OKLAHOMA 4.5 40 CONNECTICUT 5.75 VERMONT 3.2 23 OREGON 4.5 41 NEVADA 5.88 MAINE 3.4 25 MARYLAND 4.6 41 SOUTH CAROLINA 5.89 IDAHO 3.7 26 NEW JERSEY 4.7 41 WASHINGTON 5.89 UTAH 3.7 27 FLORIDA 4.8 44 MISSISSIPPI 6.011 KANSAS 3.8 27 MICHIGAN 4.8 45 ALABAMA 6.111 MINNESOTA 3.8 29 NEW YORK 4.9 46 NEW MEXICO 6.213 ARKANSAS 3.9 30 INDIANA 5.2 47 LOUISIANA 6.313 IOWA 3.9 30 OHIO 5.2 48 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 6.413 VIRGINIA 3.9 32 CALIFORNIA 5.3 48 WEST VIRGINIA 6.416 DELAWARE 4.2 32 KENTUCKY 5.3 50 ALASKA 6.616 MASSACHUSETTS 4.2 32 PENNSYLVANIA 5.3 50 ILLINOIS 6.6
Unemployment Rates, 20 Largest Metros (NSA)April 2016
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Rank MSA UR Rank MSA UR1 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
Metropolitan Statistical Area 3.4 7 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area 4.5
2 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Statistical Area 3.5 7 St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical
Area (1) 4.5
2 Boston-Cambridge-Nashua, MA-NH Metropolitan NECTA 3.5 13 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Metropolitan
Statistical Area 4.6
2 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area 3.5 14 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan
Statistical Area 4.7
5 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area 3.7 15 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
Metropolitan Statistical Area 4.8
6 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area 4.3 15 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX
Metropolitan Statistical Area 4.8
7 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD Metropolitan Statistical Area 4.5 15 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
Metropolitan Statistical Area 4.8
7 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area 4.5 18 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-
MD Metropolitan Statistical Area 4.9
7 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area 4.5 19 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
Metropolitan Statistical Area 5.6
7 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA Metropolitan Statistical Area 4.5 20 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI
Metropolitan Statistical Area 6.2
1. Area boundaries do not reflect official OMB definitions.
MD County Unemployment RatesApril 2016
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Rank Jurisdiction UR Rank Jurisdiction UR1 Howard County 3.2 13 Prince George's County 4.52 Montgomery County 3.3 14 Baltimore County 4.73 Carroll County 3.5 14 Caroline County 4.74 Anne Arundel County 3.7 16 Cecil County 5.04 Frederick County 3.7 16 Washington County 5.04 Queen Anne's County 3.7 18 Garrett County 5.77 Calvert County 3.8 19 Wicomico County 6.08 Talbot County 4.0 20 Allegany County 6.39 St. Mary's County 4.1 21 Dorchester County 6.6
10 Harford County 4.2 21 Baltimore City 6.611 Charles County 4.3 23 Somerset County 7.011 Kent County 4.3 24 Worcester County 9.4
Harford County Unemployment RateApril 2002 – April 2016 (NSA)
Apr-02
Apr-03
Apr-04
Apr-05
Apr-06
Apr-07
Apr-08
Apr-09
Apr-10
Apr-11
Apr-12
Apr-13
Apr-14
Apr-15
Apr-16
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Une
mpl
oym
ent
Rat
e
April 2016: 4.2%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Cecil County Unemployment RateApril 2002 – April 2016 (NSA)
Apr-02
Apr-03
Apr-04
Apr-05
Apr-06
Apr-07
Apr-08
Apr-09
Apr-10
Apr-11
Apr-12
Apr-13
Apr-14
Apr-15
Apr-16
0123456789
1011
Une
mpl
oym
ent
Rat
e
April 2016: 5.0%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Jan-90 Jan-95 Jan-00 Jan-05 Jan-10 Jan-1525 Year
Compositional Change
Mining and Logging 0.7% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% -0.1%
Construction 5.0% 4.5% 5.2% 5.3% 4.3% 4.5% -0.4%
Manufacturing 16.3% 14.8% 13.2% 10.7% 8.8% 8.8% -7.5%Trade, Transportation, and Utilities
20.8% 20.3% 19.9% 19.4% 18.9% 19.0% -1.8%
Information 2.4% 2.4% 2.7% 2.3% 2.1% 1.9% -0.5%
Financial Activities 6.0% 5.9% 5.9% 6.1% 6.0% 5.7% -0.3%Professional and Business Services 9.9% 10.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.7% 13.8% 3.9%Education and Health Services 9.9% 11.3% 11.5% 13.2% 15.3% 15.5% 5.6%Leisure and Hospitality 8.5% 8.9% 8.9% 9.5% 10.0% 10.6% 2.1%
Other Services 3.9% 3.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 4.0% 0.1%
Government 16.6% 16.7% 15.7% 16.4% 17.3% 15.6% -1.0%
National Nonfarm Employment, Sectoral Composition
Maryland Nonfarm EmploymentSectoral Composition
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Jan-90 Jan-95 Jan-00 Jan-05 Jan-10 Jan-1525 Year Change
Compositional Change
Mining, Logging, and Construction
7.5% 6.2% 6.5% 7.2% 5.8% 5.8% -1.8%
Manufacturing 9.1% 8.1% 7.1% 5.6% 4.6% 3.9% -5.2%Trade, Transportation, and Utilities
20.6% 19.8% 19.2% 18.4% 17.3% 17.4% -3.2%
Information 2.2% 2.1% 2.3% 2.0% 1.8% 1.5% -0.7%Financial Activities 6.3% 6.2% 6.0% 6.2% 5.7% 5.5% -0.8%Professional and Business Services
11.8% 12.8% 15.0% 15.2% 15.3% 16.1% 4.4%Education and Health Services 10.2% 12.2% 12.5% 13.8% 15.8% 16.4% 6.1%Leisure and Hospitality 8.5% 8.6% 8.3% 8.9% 9.1% 10.1% 1.6%
Other Services 4.4% 4.5% 4.6% 4.6% 4.6% 4.3% -0.1%
Government 19.4% 19.5% 18.4% 18.3% 19.9% 19.1% -0.3%
People Persons will Persist through AutomationAdvantage: Women
Source: Fivethirtyeight.com, David J. Deming, “The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market
• Interpersonal skills are increasingly a requirement of top jobs;
• While STEM skills are still desirable, they are more likely to be assumed by computers;
• A 2013 study by Oxford researchers estimated half of U.S jobs would be vulnerable to automation by 2033;
• Cognitive skills don’t vary by gender, but women perform better on tests of social perceptiveness and emotional intelligence.
Tomorrow Never Dies
*1997: Pierce Brosnan; Michelle Yeoh; Teri Hatcher
Gasoline StationsElectronics & Appliance Stores
General Merchandise StoresClothing & Clothing Accessories Stores
Furniture & Home Furn. StoresMotor Vehicle & Parts Dealers
Food & Beverage StoresBuilding Material & Garden Supplies Dealers
Miscellaneous Store RetailersSporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores
Food Services & Drinking PlacesHealth & Personal Care Stores
Internet, etc. Retailers
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%
-9.5%-3.1%
-0.7%-0.5%
0.2%2.1%2.6%
3.6%4.5%5.2%
6.5%8.3%
12.2%
12-month % change
Sales Growth by Type of Business May 2015 v. May 2016*
Source: U.S. Census Bureau *May 2016 advanced estimate
Total Retail Sales: +2.5% YOY
Conference Board Leading Economic Indicators IndexAugust 2007 through April 2016
Source: Conference Board
Aug-07
Apr-08
Dec-08
Aug-09
Apr-10
Dec-10
Aug-11
Apr-12
Dec-12
Aug-13
Apr-14
Dec-14
Aug-15
Apr-16
-1.5%
-1.0%
-0.5%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
One
-mon
th P
erce
nt C
hang
e
April 2016: 123.9 where 2010: 100
Dr. Know
• Not a Happy New Year so far. Everyone knows about China and N. Korea, but we have problems right here;
• Corporate profit margins are slipping and inflationary pressures are building – does not sound like a great recipe for stock prices or for corporate investment;
• Only the consumer is really contributing significantly to growth, with state and local government spending playing a supporting role;
• Job growth should remain decent in the near-term – we ended 2015 with a near-record in total job openings and recent JOLTS data have indicated high demand for human capital;
• It’s really about meaningful credentials – that’s just the way it is – here are some of the areas of focus – health, homebuilding, logistics, IT, finance, equipment repair/maintenance and assembly;
• We may be transitioning very quickly from the mid-cycle stage of the recovery to the late-stage: 2017-18 outlook very murky.
*1962: Sean Connery; Ursula Andress
Thank YouFollow us on Twitter
@SagePolicyGroupYou can always reach me at
[email protected] look for updates of
information at www.sagepolicy.com.Also, if you need us in a hurry, we
are at 410.522.7243 (410.522.SAGE)Please contact us when you require
economic research & policy analysis.