www.kennisnet.nl edrene barcelona - updates from nl march 2010 wim de boer (slo) & henk nijstad...

www.kennisnet.nl

Edrene Barcelona- updates from NL

March 2010Wim de Boer (SLO) & Henk Nijstad (Kennisnet)

Themes

• Commercial educational publishers

• Learning lines

• Results on teacher survey on LO-use

Commercial publishers enter the Educational Content Chain

Drivers:• Pressure of Wikiwijs / open content ?• Shrinking sales -20% ?• Leadership of the (secundary) school’s management ?• New business ?

Commercial publishers – discussion themes

• Granularity; (Folio) Methods vs. Learning objects• Findeability vs. metadata quality• Identity based search• Measuring ‘distribution channel’ indicators (leads, clicks, orders)• Business case:

• Investments in ICT, in personnel, in processes• How can we make money from this new distribution channel

Insight: teacher do need learning lines, not single learning objects (LO)

• the ‘good-old’ folio method is the ‘learning line’

• Digital LO are additional

Folio-era

• Learning line will be the backbone• Folio and LO mixed in an optimum mixture• Freedom for the teacher to replace parts of the learning

line

Digital age

tdtd

td

tdtd

td

td curr goal

td

td

tdtd

td

tdtd

td

td curr goal

td

td

td

tdtdtd

td

tdtd

td

tdtd

td

td curr goal

td

td

td

tdtdtd

td

tdtd

td

tdtd

td

td curr goal

td

td

td

tdtdtd

td

tdtd

td

tdtd

td

td curr goal

td

td

open resources

textbooks

tdtd

td

tdtd

td

td curr goal

td

td

textbooks

open resources

tdtd

td

tdtd

td

td curr goal

td

td

textbooks

open resources

only coherent textbook packages

mainly coherent textbook packages

mostly self made or other materials

prim ed

sec ed

do teachers share their resources?

• 90% develop (sometimes) rescourses

• reason: differentiate & extra content/activities

• mostly by themselves, 50% with close colleagues, < 10% with collegues from other schools

• 90% shares most of their resources• almost exclusevily with near colleagues• <5% through dedicated sites/services

www.slo.nl/downloads/2010/Leermiddelenmonitor-09-10.pdf/download or in English

Questions

what is the reason to use open/flexible learning resources?• explaining, excercicing (remediating, testing)

Why?• it is are more fun• connects beter to the interest of students• are more “in depth”

How?• are used in projects, are often digital• adaptebility is of importance

how do we label the materials in a way that will help answering the design need of a teacher? (-> metadata & interface)

In form prim ed sec ed

goal 94% 89%

form (pdf / ppt / paper / animation / etc) 92% 88%

experiences in the classroom 84% 80%

use with / without a PC 81% 77%

number of hours 63% 73%

mentioning source 26% 41%

Content differentiation possibilities 96% 79%

variation in pedagigical approaches 94% 84%

fits in a curricululum of a year for a course 91% 78%

(partial) replacement textbook 85% 82%

relates to general curriculum goals 78% 67%

continue the good worka decent proposal

Thank you …

April 2010Wim de Boer (SLO) & Henk Nijstad (Kennisnet)

Wim de Boer (SLO) w.deboer@slo.nl Henk Nijstad (Kennisnet) H.Nijstad@kennisnet.nl