ranking factors on the nordics
Post on 08-May-2015
1.974 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Ranking Factors Of The Nordics SWE, NOR, FIN, DK
Marcus Tober
Stockholm
10/15/2013
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 1
Founder of
Searchmetrics
I‘m in love with SEO
and search since
2001
Study of computer
science in Berlin, so
I’m the techie
Made with Love in
Berlin
120 passionate
People
Innovator in SEO
Software since 2007
Follow us
twitter.com/searchmetrics
facebook.com/Searchmetrics
If you want to get the deck send an email to
marcus@searchmetrics.com with “Deck
SMX Stockholm”
Business
Product
Website
World Wide Web
Ranking S
Ranking Factors – 2013
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 13
• Basis:
• google.se / google.no / google.fi / google.dk
• Top 3 SERPs
• 10.000 Keywords
• Organic search results (no paid search)
• Average Values according to the respective Position/s in the SERPs
• Correlation ≠ Causation
Google Ranking Factors US 2013
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 14
Google Ranking Factors US 2013 vs 2012
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 15
Change
Google Ranking Factors US 2013 vs 2012
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 16
EMD
Panda
Penguin
GOOGLEvolution
Aug./Sept 2013
SEOvolution
Ø
=
Ranking Factors – SWE 2013: Onpage
Keyword in Description
A low correlation does not necessarily mean low ranking factor
Ranking Factors – SWE 2013: Onpage
BRANDS
Low/near-zero Correlation
BUT: ~45% have that Feature
Keyword in Description
Quality over quantity
Don‘t overuse ads!
Focus on content
Link Features
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 38
Anchor Text!
Ranking Factors – US 2013: Links
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 39
Ranking Factors – SWE 2013: Links
Ranking Correlations: Backlinks
Number of Backlinks
Ranking Correlations: Backlinks
Much more Backlinks on foremost Positions!
Number of Backlinks
Ranking Correlations: Backlinks
Ø SEO Visibility of backlinking URL
Ranking Correlations: Backlinks
High SEO Visibility of Link Source on foremost Positions!
Ø SEO Visibility of backlinking URL
Ranking Correlations: Backlinks
% Backlinks with Stopword
Ranking Correlations: Backlinks
More Stopwords in Anchortext on foremost Positions!
% Backlinks with Stopword
Ranking Correlations: Backlinks
BRANDS
More Nofollow Links on SERP 1!
% Backlinks rel=nofollow
Ranking Correlations: Backlinks
% Backlinks rel=nofollow
Ranking Correlations: Backlinks
More Nofollow Links on SERP 1!
BRANDS
% Backlinks rel=nofollow
Anchor Texts
Ranking Correlation – Keyword Links
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 50
Ranking Correlation – Keyword Links
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 51
Rest In Peace
Mr. „Lin-K-Farm“
If this was part of your strategy
building business, good night!!!
It‘s really hard to perform
continously good!
But too much lazyness
And you become a loser.
Be laser sharp and focused
all the time.
SEOs are always looking for a single strong
signal that they can focus on. This is a
behavior since the beginning of SEO.
If you still think this is the key to success,
you‘ll always fear the next update!
Penguin 2.0 – Loser reeds.com
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 59
Penguin 2.0
Penguin 2.0 – Loser reeds.com
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 61
Penguin 2.0 – Loser reeds.com
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 62
!
Mr. „Lin-K-Farm“
Penguin 2.0 – Loser reeds.com
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 65
Penguin 2.0
Recovered!
Penguin 2.0 – Loser reeds.com
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 66
Penguin 2.0 – Loser reeds.com
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 67
Anchor Texts - Evolution
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 68
Brand Link
www.domain.com
„Domain“ / Company, Product
Diluted Anchor
DO:
More (Stop)Words
in Anchor Text
DON‘T:
„Hard“
Anchor Texts
Neutral Anchor
here
Generic
Terms
Over-optimized…?
Over-optimized…?
„Elegant“ appearance?
Let‘s talk about awesome
Penguin recovery stories.
Penguin Recovery: skyscanner.se
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 74
Recent Recovery
Penguin 1
Recovery
took 18 Months to recover
Penguin Recovery: skyscanner.se
Drop on Keyword Level
Loser: Week after Penguin
Penguin Recovery skyscanner.se
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 76
#7 ~#7
Complete Recovery
Penguin Recovery skyscanner.se
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 77
#1
~#3
Better than before
Penguin Recovery: skyscanner.se
Page 78
Winner: Last week
Penguin Recovery: skycanner.se
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 79
Top Anchor Texts of Backlinks (October 2013)
Fewer „hard“ Anchor Texts more NEW Brandlinks
They build a lot of links in the past months
They build a lot of links in the past months
Penguin Recovery: check24.de
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 83
True Recovery
Penguin
Recovery
ca. 03/25/2012
took 6 Months to recover
Penguin Recovery: check24.de
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 84
Drop on Keyword Level
Loser: Week after Penguin
Penguin Recovery: check24.de
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 85
New vs Lost Backlinks –6 Months after Penguin
Very good Strategy concerning new Linkbuilding + Removal of bad quality Links.
Penguin Recovery: check24.de
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 86
Top Anchor Texts of Backlinks (Around Penguin)
„Hard“ Keyword Links
Penguin Recovery: check24.de
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 87
Top Anchor Texts of Backlinks (October 2013)
Fewer „hard“ Anchor Texts more NEW Brandlinks
Onpage (technical) Features
Ranking Factors – SWE 2013: Onpage
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Onpage
Keyword in URL
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Onpage
Keyword in URL
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Onpage
Keyword in Domain
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Onpage
Keyword in Domain
EMD is still working in the Nordics.
Social Signals and
Social Graph
Test #2
Search Engines want to deliver the best
results, fresh and relevant to the user.
Hundred of millions of people share content
every day in social networks.
Could there be a reason why search engines
wont be interested in this data?
Where is the value? A fresco from the
19th century
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent
making great content.
Matt Cutts - 08/20/2013 (Head of Google Webspam Team)
What do users click, like, share…?
Relevant Content!
World Wide Web
Relevant Content!
Click!
Social Signals
User Signals
3 2 1
Ranking Factors – US 2013 Social
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 101
Ranking Factors – SWE 2013 Social
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 102
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Social
Google Plusones
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Social
Google Plusones
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Social
BRANDS
Much more Social Signals on foremost Positions!
Google Plusones
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Social
Facebook Total
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Social
Facebook Total
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Social
BRANDS
Much more Social Signals on foremost Positions!
Facebook Total
Just trying to decide the
politest way to debunk the
idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings. […] Suffice it to say that I would be
very skeptical of anyone
who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
Matt Cutts - 08/20/2013 (Head of Google Webspam Team)
Test Procedure of Tests #1 / #2
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 110
Topic
Issue 1
Text 1a
Text 1b
Issue 2
Text 2a
Text 2b
Identic Keyword Set
Identic Keyword Set
Network Signal Takeaways
1.Number of Shares does not influence indexation
2.Shares alone do not necessarily effect indexation
1.PlusOnes nearly instantly effect indexation
2.44 / 48 keywords indexed and ranked on high(est) positions
Test #1
Network Signal Takeaways
1.Number of shares does not influence ranking
2.Shares alone can effect good rankings, but not in the long term
1.PlusOnes effect better rankings in average
2.Few PlusOnes are enough to outperform FB-rankings on the same keyword set
Test #2
Click!
Integration of Social Buttons
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 114
32,4%
17,5%
Google+
16,6%
Pinterest 4,5%
Share This 2,7%
Addthis 9,8%
16,1%
13,1%
7,9%
7,5%
Integration of Social Buttons
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 115
34,5%
17,5%
Google+
17,9%
Pinterest 3,5%
Share This 1,6%
Addthis 11,8%
15,6%
13,1%
7,9%
7,4%
Integration of Social Buttons
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 116
36,1%
20,5%
Google+
17,4%
Pinterest 3,1%
Share This 1,6%
Addthis 10,3%
17,9%
12,8%
7,9%
8,6%
Users are looking for great content/products.
Users want to have their problems solved.
Users don’t like distraction, salesyness, thin me
too stuff. They want to be impressed!
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 119
Ranking Factors – SWE 2013: Content
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Content
Number of Words in Text
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Content
Slightly more Words on better Positions
BRANDS
Number of Words in Text
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Content
Number of Images on Site
Ranking Correlations – 2013: Content
More Images on foremost Positions
BRANDS
Number of Images on Site
What is relevant content? What‘s the user intention? What does the user really need?
Query: Chicken Marsala Recipe
http://www.olivegarden.com/Recipes/Main-Dishes/Chicken-Marsala/
They rank on #13
Content Optimization
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 128
Content Optimization
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 129
Page 130
Content Optimization
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 131
Content Optimization
Page 132 10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │
Ranking Factors – SWE 2013: Content
Ranking Correlation – 2013: Content
Proof Keywords
Ranking Correlation – 2013: Content
Proof Keywords
Ranking Correlation – 2013: Content
Relevant Keywords
Ranking Correlation – 2013: Content
Relevant Keywords
Your turn…
10/16/2013 ® Searchmetrics Inc. 2013 │ Page 138
Searchmetrics – leading vendor of search an social analytics software with international focus
top related