1. what are the overall objectives 2.where are we now 3.what follows 4.evolution of design/ current...

1. What Are The Overall Objectives2. Where Are We Now 3. What Follows4. Evolution Of Design/ Current Size, Etc.5. Details Of Design Options6. Budget7. Staff Recommendation8. Where Do We Go From Here

OVER VIEW

QUALITY

- QUALITY, ROBUST, ACCESSIBLE FACILITY THAT MEETS THE SPACE AND PROGRAM NEEDS OF USERS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE. POSITIVE EXPERIENCES OF USERS AND GENERATES REVENUE.

SCHEDULE

- MEET A TIMELINE IMPOSED BY FUNDING PROGRAM.

WHAT ARE THE OVERALL OBJECTIVES?

BUDGET

- GET AS MUCH AS WE CAN IN THE BUILDING WITHIN A REASONABLE AND AFFORDABLE COST

SUSTAINABILITY

- MAKE SENSIBLE CHOICES ON EQUIPMENT, DESIGN AND BUILDING ENVELOPE TO REDUCE LONG TERM COSTS/CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT.

WHAT ARE THE OVERALL OBJECTIVES?

- KEY POINT WHERE THE DESIGN ELEMENTS ARE BEING FIXED

- FOOTING DETAILS ARE MORE SIGNIFICANTLY ADVANCED BECAUSE OF ACCELERATED

SCHEDULE AND WILL DEFINE FOOTPRINT.

- FIRST COST ESTIMATE PREPARED. CLASS “D” TO “TEST” THE DESIGN.

- KEY DECISIONS MADE NOW, THEN ADVANCE TO MORE DETAILED, TENDER READY

DOCUMENT.

WHERE ARE WE NOW?

- FURTHER DESIGN DEVELOPMENT ON ALL BUILDING DETAILS. REFINING DESIGN.

- FURTHER CLASS “C”, “B” AND “A” COST.

- WORK WITH THE STEERING COMMITTEE.

- ISSUE GENERAL TENDER FOR BALANCE OF WORK.

WHAT FOLLOWS?

- UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FOOTPRINT AND TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE

- FIELD HOUSE AREA CALCULATION WORK FROM 2008 IS “LIGHT.

- TO ACCOMMODATE GOOD PLAY AND ALL SURFACES, FULL SIZED INDOOR FIELD, IT IS FELT THAT EXTRA SPACE IS NEEDED. THIS IS MOST OF THE FOOTPRINT

GROWTH.

“GROWTH” OF FACILITY

-THERE ARE INTERIOR SPACES THAT HAVE INCREASED IN SIZE. MOST

OFTEN ON SECOND LEVEL AREAS (ASSOCIATION OFFICES, MEZZANINE,

FIELD VIEWING SPACES OR SECOND FLOOR), BUT ALSO IN CIRCULATION AND LOBBY SPACE. THIS IS THE

GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE INCREASE VS FOOTPRINT INCREASE.

“GROWTH” OF FACILITY

- ORIGINAL PROGRAM (2008)- TECHNICAL COMMITTEE WORK- STEERING COMMITTEE WORK- INFORMAL INPUT- PUBLIC INPUT WORKSHOP- STEERING COMMITTEE TOUR OF SIMILAR

FACILITIES GOOD – BAD – EXPERIENCES OF OTHERS

- TRYING TO GET AS MUCH BUILDING AS WE CAN AND ADDRESS ALL OBJECTIVES- BUILDING PROGRAM VS BUDGET

WHAT IS INFLUENCING DESIGN

ALL (INCLUDING USERS)

- BRIGHT AND AIRY

- LIKE KEY FEATURES OF INVISTA CENTRE

- ROBUST, QUALITY, SPACE, ACCESSIBLE

- COST EFFECTIVE TO OPERATE

- SERVE AS A UNIFIED RECREATIONAL COMPLEX

WHAT THE COMMITTEE HEARD FROM USERS

USERS

- ENSURE BIG ENOUGH LOBBY AND CIRCULATION AREA- SPACES TO SET UP REGISTRATION/ CONVENOR AREA, ETC.- STORAGE, STORAGE, STORAGE- DRESSING ROOM BIG ENOUGH (INVISTA

TOO SMALL) AND SHAPED RIGHT.- OFFICES FOR ASSOCIATIONS, GIVEN IT IS

THE COMMUNITY FACILITY AND HOME TO MINOR SPORTS ASSOCIATIONS

- VIEWING FOR SOCCER (SECOND FLOOR)- SOCCER DRESSING ROOMS NOT TO ACCESS

FIELD DIRECTLY

WHAT THE COMMITTEE HEARD FROM USERS (cont’d)

ADJUSTED CLASS D BUDGET ESTIMAGE

$28,751,000

AVAILABLE CONSTRUCTION BUDGET

$25,369,000 (CITY’S BUDGET)

COST ESTIMATES

1- REDUCE NORTH PARKING $80,000

2- REDUCE WEST PARKING $110,000

3-REDUCE BACK OF HOUSE $120,000

4-ELIMINATE MULTIPURPOSE/OFFICE RM $380,000

5-REDUCE SOCCER WALKING TRACK $200,000

6- REDUCE SIZE OF RINK 1 $280,000*

7-REDUCE THE TENNIS COURT SIZE $100,000

8-DEFERMENT OF UPPER FLOOR LOUNGE AT PADS 1

AND 2- $400,000*

Options:

North Parking Lot Reduction #1

West Parking Lot Reduction #2

Axonometric Plan Area Reduction #3

First Floor Plan Area Reduction #3

Axonometric Plan Area Reduction #4

First Floor Plan Area Reduction #4

Axonometric Plan Area Reduction #5

First Floor Plan Area Reduction #5

Axonometric Plan Area Reduction #6

First Floor Plan Area Reduction #6a

Second Floor Plan Area Reduction #6a

Building Sections Area Reduction #6a

First Floor Plan Area Reduction #6b

Second Floor Plan Area Reduction #6b

Building Sections Area Reduction #6b

Axonometric Plan Area Reduction #7

First Floor Plan Area Reduction #7

Axonometric Plan Area Reduction #8

First Floor Plan Area Reduction #8

1- REDUCE NORTH PARKING $80,000

2- REDUCE WEST PARKING $110,000

3-REDUCE BACK OF HOUSE $120,000

4-ELIMINATE MULTIPURPOSE/OFFICE RM $380,000

5-REDUCE SOCCER WALKING TRACK $200,000

6- REDUCE SIZE OF RINK 1 $280,000*

7-REDUCE THE TENNIS COURT SIZE $100,000

8-DEFERMENT OF UPPER FLOOR LOUNGE AT PADS 1 AND 2- $400,000*

Options 1-7 Total= $1,270,000

FROM THE REPORT

- CONSIDER REMOVAL OF OPTIONS 1-4

- STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS PROCEEDING WITH PROJECT AS

DESIGNED

STAFF RECOMMENDATION