1 assetnet: assets and ethnicity network dr omar khan, head of policy research

1

ASSETnet: Assets and ethnicity network

Dr Omar Khan, Head of Policy Research

2

About Runnymede

The Runnymede Trust is an independent policy research organisation fighting for racial justice through:

High quality research and analysisEngaging communitiesInfluencing policy

3

About ASSETnet

Aim is to spread awareness and raise interest • About asset-building policies among race equality and other organisations• About ethnicity among those already committed to asset-building

Three elements• Social media site (please join!)• National workshops/events (UK, Germany, Hungary, Spain, Belgium)• Policy conference in Brussels (February 2012)

4

Why Assets Matter: Evidence

Assets are far more unevenly distributed in the UK than income• Anywhere from 10–20% of people have no assets at all• Wealthiest 1% owned approximately a fifth of the UK’s marketable wealth... Half

the population shared only 7% of total wealth• Two-thirds of British households in Britain have less than £3000 in non-housing

savings and assets.• Housing:

• 40% of the total wealth in the UK, or £6875 billion, is held in housing.• In 2003, half the UK population owned only 1% of non-housing assets.

• Consequences: less choices, social mobility, ability to provide for children, and social cohesion

5

Why Assets Matter: Ethnicity

• 60% of Asian and Black British people have no savings at all, twice the rate for white people. Less diverse too.

6

Why Assets Matter: Arguments

• Social mobility: fair life chances as well as efficient markets require more people to have assets

• Behavioural: ‘while income feeds people’s stomachs, assets change their minds’ (Sherraden, 1991)

• Freedom: Expands choices

• Citizenship; people hold a ‘stake’ in their society. Integration/Cohesion

Different arguments for asset-building lead to different policies

7

Why Assets Matter: PoliciesPolicies in UK focused on savings and behavioural arguments (start

habit). Not redistributive, citizenship or freedom.• Child Trust Fund, Saving Gateway: scrapped• NEST: auto-enrolled pensions scheme for low-income. Growth and security• Housing: shared ownership, other schemes• Asset inequality and taxation:

• No asset-based tax policies for low-income people; tax incentives on ISAs and pensions as asset-based policies for upper income quintiles

• Inheritance tax and wealth tax?• Council tax or property tax? Revenue used to provide assets for all?

• Shared or collective ownership: a variety of policies for everyone to own in (part-)publicly owned institutions or in public goods. Details important.

8

Ethnicity and asset-holding in the UK

• Evidence that 60% have no savings• Bangladeshi and African with less than one tenth White British

asset-holding• Following slides explain labour market experience• However, might expect migrants to have less

• No intergenerational inheritance• Labour market access: social networks, qualifications, (perceived) language

• But evidence that British-born BME men more likely to be unemployed than foreign born fathers (Heath and Li)

Low income and ethnicity

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Bangladeshi

Pakistani

Black African

Black Caribbean

Indian

White Other

White British

Income poverty rate (%)

• Bangladeshi (65%), Pakistani (55%), White British (20%)• Reflects unemployment but also poor quality work

Income poverty rate by ethnicity, 2002-5

Self-employment and ethnicity• Pakistani and Bangladeshi with highest rates• Most British-born groups lower than migrants, except above• Discrimination as cause? In recruitment (DWP survey), and

progression (RfO research)

Proportion of working population in self-employment

by ethnicity, 2007

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

White

All BME

Pakistani

Bangladeshi

Chinese

Mixed

Indian

Other

Black

Black African

Self-employment (%)

11

Ethnicity and self-employment by sector

• Chinese (72%) and Bangladeshi (63%) much more likely to be in Catering.

• Pakistani (36%) and Black African (17%) much more likely to work in Transport .

• Higher income volatility, greater chance of business failure, and no employer pensions contribution or other benefits

Industry of self-employment by ethnicity (males), 2001

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Chinese

Bangladeshi

Indian

Pakistani

White

Black Caribbean

Black African

DistHotelCater Manufacturing Transport Construction Finance Other

Conclusion: Questions for microfinance• Do we want ‘repeat’ customers? Danger is that lose best clients as they build

up savings or improve credit score or business skills to get ‘mainstream’ loan.

• Why people need microfinance: in part because they have no savings or assets

• Can microfinance institutions develop alternative policies, including short-term AND long-term savings?

• Should all assets be ‘leveraged’• If focus on self-employment and entrepreneurship, how ensure social

protection and rights, in particular pensions?• Are we reaching migrants and ethnic minorities, or are they being channeled

into particular sectors?

12

13

Contact us• To discuss our research and work, please

contact

• Omar Khan• omar@runnymedetrust.org • 020 7377 9222

BME people and pensioner povertyRisk of pensioner poverty by ethnicity, 2007-8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

White Pakistani &

Bangladeshi

Black Caribbean Indian Chinese or other All

Risk

of p

ensio

ner p

over

ty (%

)

• All (18%), Black Caribbean (30%), Pakistani & Bangladeshi (49%)

Why are BME people poor when older?

White Ethnic minorities

% with private pension (in employment) 53 39

All Ethnic minorities

% building entitlement to S2P 75 65

% with no savings

Black or Black British 63

Asian or Asian British 60

All 33

• Less likely to have pensions…

• Less able to compensate with other assets – • Savings• Home ownership

(2005-6)

(2005)