1969 preliminary communications - bmj · by increased granulation of the juxta-glomerular...

3
408 15 November 1969 Preliminary Communications MEDIBALJOURNAL cosactrin (see Table). During this period there was no signi- ficant difference between the response to doses of 0 25 and 15 mg. The high dose, however, gave significantly higher responses at 90, 120, and 180 minutes (P<0 01). The peak of the response was seen at 60 minutes and persisted to 90 minutes with the higher dose. At five hours after zero time the plasma fluorogenic corticosteroids were still significantly higher than the baseline specimens after both 0 25 and 1-5 mg. (P<0 05 and P<0 01 respectively). Levels of Plasma Fluorogenic Corticosteroids After Nasal Insufflation of Tetracosactrin (Results Expressed in u..g./100 ml. of Plasma) Dose of Tetracosactrin Time 0 25 mg. 15 mg. Mean S. E. Mean S.E. Baseline .1 5 0 5 2.0 0 4 15 min. 15 9 2 8 17 3 1 5 30 ,, 242 08 270 14 60 ,, 291 20 336 1-3 90 ,, 21-3 2 3 32-9 1-4 120 , 139 1-3 313 1-4 180 ,, .. 87 10 16 4 1-2 300 ,, 46 10 64 1.2 No side-effects were experienced by any of the subjects, apart from a slight tendency to sneeze. COMMENT These results provide evidence of the efficient nasal absorp- tion of tetracosactrin even at low doses. The duration of the response is equal to that occurring after doses of 025 mg. injected intramuscularly (Greig et al., 1966). It is suggested that administration of the peptide by this route could be used for diagnostic purposes and indeed for therapy if the duration of the rise of the fluorogenic corticosteroids can be prolonged. Work on this and other adrenocorticotrophic p:2ptides is in progress. We should like to thank Dr. T. Binns, of Ciba Laboratories, Horsham, for the tetracosactrin and also Dr. 0. Savage, Professor C. A. Keele, and Professor R. H. S. Thompson for their help and encouragement. M. A. C. was partly financed by the Harold Cooper Trust Fund. J. KEENAN, M.B., B.CHIR., M.R.C.PATH., Lecturer in Chemical Pathology, Courtauld Institute of Biochcmistry. M. A. CHAMBERLAIN, M.B., D.C.H., M.R.C.P., Senior Registrar, Department of Rheumatology and Physical Medicine. Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London W.l. REFERENCES Greig, W. R., Browning, M. C. K., Boyle, J. A., and Maxw 11, J. D. (1966). Yournal of Endocrinology, 34, 411. Mlimica, N., Wegienka, L. C., and Forsham, P. H. (1968). Journal of the American Medical Association, 203, 802. Ritchie, J. M., and Brundell, J. M. (1967). British Aledical Journal, 1, 608. Spencer-Peet, J., Daly, J. R., and Smith, V. (1965). Journal of Endo- crinology, 31, 235. Wormsley, K. G. (1968). Lancet, 1, 57. Medical Memoranda Transient Hypertension Caused by Segmental Renal Artery Occlusion British Medical Journal, 1969, 4, 408-410 It has been well established, both clinically and experimentally, that systemic hypertension can be caused by renal ischaemia resulting from constriction of a renal artery. On the other hand, systemic hypertension caused by local ischaemia resulting from a segmental renal infarct is scarcely mentioned in the literature. It was, however, experimentally evoked in rabbits, where it decreased spontaneously within a few weeks (Alexander et al., 1961). The details of the mechanism relating systemic hypertension to the changes in the kidney are as yet not fully understood, but there are strong indications that the initial phase of reno- vascular hypertension is closely connected with increased activity of the renin-angiotensin system, both in arterial constriction and in infarction caused by occlusion of a branch of the renal artery. In the few publications on segmental infarction as an unequivocal cause of systemic hypertension (Brown ct al., 1960; Stamey, 1963) the patients are reported to have been treated by nephrectomy. To our knowledge there are no reports on patients with acute severe hypertension caused by segmental infarction who were satisfactorily treated by gradually diminish- ing doses of antihypertensive drugs. CASE REPORT The patient, a 35-year-old task analyst, had repeatedly visited his family doctor for minor complaints. At these consultations his blood pressure had always been normal, as it was over a period of four iears when measured by the physician at his place of employ- ment. In November 1965 his blood pressure suddenly rose to 250/150 mm. Hg. He was examined by one of us (H. B. B.) and admitted to our clinic on 13 November. He had no history of acute pain in the loins, nor any symptoms suggesting pre-existent renal disease. His urine had always looked normal. There was no family history of hypertension. On physical examination the only abnormal findings were a blood pressure of 250/150 mm. Hg and a red face. There were no abdominal bruits ; the ocular fundi were normal. INVESTIGATIONS Blood: haemoglobin 16-0 g./100 ml. ; plasma urea 30 and creatinine 1-2 mg./100 ml.; plasma sodium 140, potassium 4-2, chloride 99 0, and bicarbonate 22-5 mEq/l. Urine: highest specific gravity of spontaneously voided urine 1028 ; no albuminuria ; microscopy normal ; vanillyl-mandelic acid 4-4 mg./24 hours (normal). Electro- cardiogram showed only left ventricular strain. X-ray examination showed the heart to be of normal size and configuration. Intra- venous pyelbgrams taken 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes after injection of iopanoic acid (Telepaque) showed normal anatomy and normal arrival and clearance times of the contrast medium. Arteriography of the kidneys by Seldinger's method showed normal main renal arteries and their branches, except in the upper pole of the left kidney, where selective angiography showed occlusion of a branch of a renal artery (Figs. 1A and 2A). Renal Biopsy.-The greater part of the left kidney was inspected directly at operation (Mr. A. Lammers, urologist). In one area the surface of the upper pole showed a bluish-red elevation, measuring 3 cm. in diameter, evidently a fresh infarct. About 2 cm. below this there was a greyish depression 1-5 cm. in diameter, in all likelihood an old infarct. Biopsy specimens were taken from both these areas and from the normal tissue. HISTOLOGY Fresh Infarct.-Haematin-phloxine stain: the glomeruli were normal ; the most striking feature was tubular atrophy (Fig. 3); on 22 January 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://www.bmj.com/ Br Med J: first published as 10.1136/bmj.4.5680.408 on 15 November 1969. Downloaded from

Upload: others

Post on 25-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1969 Preliminary Communications - BMJ · by increased granulation of the juxta-glomerular apparatus. The duration of hypertension was long in compari-son with the periods of only

408 15 November 1969 Preliminary Communications MEDIBALJOURNAL

cosactrin (see Table). During this period there was no signi-ficant difference between the response to doses of 0 25 and15 mg. The high dose, however, gave significantly higherresponses at 90, 120, and 180 minutes (P<0 01). The peakof the response was seen at 60 minutes and persisted to 90minutes with the higher dose. At five hours after zero timethe plasma fluorogenic corticosteroids were still significantlyhigher than the baseline specimens after both 0 25 and 1-5 mg.(P<0 05 and P<0 01 respectively).

Levels of Plasma Fluorogenic Corticosteroids After Nasal Insufflation ofTetracosactrin (Results Expressed in u..g./100 ml. of Plasma)

Dose of Tetracosactrin

Time 0 25 mg. 15 mg.

Mean S. E. Mean S.E.

Baseline .1 5 0 5 2.0 0 415 min. 15 9 2 8 17 3 1 530 ,, 242 08 270 1460 ,, 291 20 336 1-390 ,, 21-3 2 3 32-9 1-4120 , 139 1-3 313 1-4180 ,, .. 87 10 16 4 1-2300 ,, 46 10 64 1.2

No side-effects were experienced by any of the subjects, apartfrom a slight tendency to sneeze.

COMMENT

These results provide evidence of the efficient nasal absorp-tion of tetracosactrin even at low doses. The duration of the

response is equal to that occurring after doses of 025 mg.injected intramuscularly (Greig et al., 1966). It is suggestedthat administration of the peptide by this route could be usedfor diagnostic purposes and indeed for therapy if the durationof the rise of the fluorogenic corticosteroids can be prolonged.Work on this and other adrenocorticotrophic p:2ptides is inprogress.

We should like to thank Dr. T. Binns, of Ciba Laboratories,Horsham, for the tetracosactrin and also Dr. 0. Savage, ProfessorC. A. Keele, and Professor R. H. S. Thompson for their help andencouragement. M. A. C. was partly financed by the Harold CooperTrust Fund.

J. KEENAN, M.B., B.CHIR., M.R.C.PATH.,Lecturer in Chemical Pathology, Courtauld Institute

of Biochcmistry.M. A. CHAMBERLAIN, M.B., D.C.H., M.R.C.P.,Senior Registrar, Department of Rheumatology and

Physical Medicine.Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London W.l.

REFERENCES

Greig, W. R., Browning, M. C. K., Boyle, J. A., and Maxw 11, J. D.(1966). Yournal of Endocrinology, 34, 411.

Mlimica, N., Wegienka, L. C., and Forsham, P. H. (1968). Journal ofthe American Medical Association, 203, 802.

Ritchie, J. M., and Brundell, J. M. (1967). British Aledical Journal, 1,608.

Spencer-Peet, J., Daly, J. R., and Smith, V. (1965). Journal of Endo-crinology, 31, 235.

Wormsley, K. G. (1968). Lancet, 1, 57.

Medical Memoranda

Transient Hypertension Caused bySegmental Renal Artery Occlusion

British Medical Journal, 1969, 4, 408-410

It has been well established, both clinically and experimentally,that systemic hypertension can be caused by renal ischaemiaresulting from constriction of a renal artery. On the otherhand, systemic hypertension caused by local ischaemia resultingfrom a segmental renal infarct is scarcely mentioned in theliterature. It was, however, experimentally evoked in rabbits,where it decreased spontaneously within a few weeks (Alexanderet al., 1961).The details of the mechanism relating systemic hypertension

to the changes in the kidney are as yet not fully understood,but there are strong indications that the initial phase of reno-vascular hypertension is closely connected with increased activityof the renin-angiotensin system, both in arterial constrictionand in infarction caused by occlusion of a branch of the renalartery.

In the few publications on segmental infarction as anunequivocal cause of systemic hypertension (Brown ct al.,1960; Stamey, 1963) the patients are reported to have beentreated by nephrectomy. To our knowledge there are no reportson patients with acute severe hypertension caused by segmentalinfarction who were satisfactorily treated by gradually diminish-ing doses of antihypertensive drugs.

CASE REPORT

The patient, a 35-year-old task analyst, had repeatedly visitedhis family doctor for minor complaints. At these consultations hisblood pressure had always been normal, as it was over a period offour iears when measured by the physician at his place of employ-

ment. In November 1965 his blood pressure suddenly rose to250/150 mm. Hg. He was examined by one of us (H. B. B.) andadmitted to our clinic on 13 November. He had no history ofacute pain in the loins, nor any symptoms suggesting pre-existentrenal disease. His urine had always looked normal. There wasno family history of hypertension. On physical examination theonly abnormal findings were a blood pressure of 250/150 mm. Hgand a red face. There were no abdominal bruits ; the ocular fundiwere normal.

INVESTIGATIONS

Blood: haemoglobin 16-0 g./100 ml. ; plasma urea 30 and creatinine1-2 mg./100 ml.; plasma sodium 140, potassium 4-2, chloride99 0, and bicarbonate 22-5 mEq/l. Urine: highest specific gravityof spontaneously voided urine 1028 ; no albuminuria ; microscopynormal ; vanillyl-mandelic acid 4-4 mg./24 hours (normal). Electro-cardiogram showed only left ventricular strain. X-ray examinationshowed the heart to be of normal size and configuration. Intra-venous pyelbgrams taken 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes after injectionof iopanoic acid (Telepaque) showed normal anatomy and normalarrival and clearance times of the contrast medium. Arteriographyof the kidneys by Seldinger's method showed normal main renalarteries and their branches, except in the upper pole of the leftkidney, where selective angiography showed occlusion of a branchof a renal artery (Figs. 1A and 2A).

Renal Biopsy.-The greater part of the left kidney was inspecteddirectly at operation (Mr. A. Lammers, urologist). In one areathe surface of the upper pole showed a bluish-red elevation,measuring 3 cm. in diameter, evidently a fresh infarct. About2 cm. below this there was a greyish depression 1-5 cm. in diameter,in all likelihood an old infarct. Biopsy specimens were taken fromboth these areas and from the normal tissue.

HISTOLOGY

Fresh Infarct.-Haematin-phloxine stain: the glomeruli werenormal ; the most striking feature was tubular atrophy (Fig. 3);

on 22 January 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.

http://ww

w.bm

j.com/

Br M

ed J: first published as 10.1136/bmj.4.5680.408 on 15 N

ovember 1969. D

ownloaded from

Page 2: 1969 Preliminary Communications - BMJ · by increased granulation of the juxta-glomerular apparatus. The duration of hypertension was long in compari-son with the periods of only

Medical Memoranda

the arterioles had slightly thickened waills. Bowie's stain: thejuxtaglomerular apparatus of many glomeruli showed abundantgranulation (Fig. 4); for proper evaluation of the juxtaglomerularapparatus the patient was infused before operation with a solutioncontaining 10 g. of NaCl.

Old Infarct.-Haematin-phloxine stain: most glomeruli were

BRITISHMEDICAL JOURNAL 409

hyalinized ; in some areas periglomerular fibrosis was observedthe tubules were atrophied.Normal Kidney.-Haematin-phloxine stain: the glomeruli were

normal ; the tubules were not atrophied. Bowie's stain: On closeinspection of the juxtaglomerular apparatus a few granules wereseen.

FIG. 1.-Selective angiogram of left kidney on (A) 25 November 1965, showing segmental infarction ofthe upper lobe: and (B), 14 September 1966, showing clear shrinkage of the upper pole with

hypertrophy of the remaining part.

FIG. 2.-A, venous phase of angiogram shown in Fig. 1 A. B, venous phase of angiogram shownin Fig. B.

cu-b--oi kWA LAI-aiu llcrena

4dIxF L t.UDUupune rixtagipyspecimen ot ICsh imarctaton. ibundaant granulation ofcuboidal epithelium and crenated basal membranes. (Haematin-phloxine. juxtaglomerular apparatus. (Bowie. X 400.)

X 125.)

15 November 1969

on 22 January 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.

http://ww

w.bm

j.com/

Br M

ed J: first published as 10.1136/bmj.4.5680.408 on 15 N

ovember 1969. D

ownloaded from

Page 3: 1969 Preliminary Communications - BMJ · by increased granulation of the juxta-glomerular apparatus. The duration of hypertension was long in compari-son with the periods of only

410 15 November 1969 Medical Memoranda BDICA JOURNALThe secretory rate of aldosterone was 220 pg./24 hours on a

diet containing 160 mEq of sodium per day. This value is abovenormal (60-190 Ag./24 hours at an intake of 100 mEq Na+ perday) for this laboratory.

SUBSEQUENT COURSE AND TREATMENT

The patient received a salt-restricted diet and was treated withantihypertensive drugs. Fig. 5 shows blood pressure readings over

blood pressure (mm.Hq)260

11 ~~hemiparesis kulbr2120200

16011948T[40 -

12011111 9801 1160

nicoumrlonechlorothiazide 50tmg./Z4hour P] frusemride 4O-mg./24hour

N DJ F M A S 0 J F M A M J J A'S 0 N'D J FM A M J .J1965 1966 1967 1968

FIG. 5.-Blood pressure readings before and during medical treatment.

a period of two years, during which gradually diminishing dosesof methyldopa (Aldomet) were administered, together with ninemonths' treatment with natriuretics.On 14 September 1966 the patient was readmitted to our clinic

because of an acute left-sided hemiparesis ; the blood pressure hadnot risen significantly. Cerebral arteriography showed generalizedcerebral arteriosclerosis without any local occlusions. Immediatelyafter this examination selective angiography of both renal arterieswas performed. Figs. 1B and 2B show a clear shrinkage of theupper pole of the left kidney. The arteriograms of the right kidneyshowed no change from the normal picture found in 1965. Thehemiparesis disappeared after two months.

In January 1967 a mild bulbar paralysis was diagnosed; thisdisappeared spontaneously. The secretory rate of aldosterone was406 ,g./24 hours, the patient receiving a salt-restricted (10 mEq)diet ; this value is within the normal range. During the course ofthe disease, when the blood pressure had fallen, the peripheralplasma renin activity in the upright position was twice measuredby Boucher's method. It was within the normal range on a salt-restricted diet: 670 and 1,430 mjg./100 ml./three hours in May1967 and January 1968 respectively. The kidney function did notchange significantly during our three and a half years' observation.In March 1968 the plasma urea was 40 and creatinine 1-2 mg./100 ml. An anticoagulant was administered to reduce the risksof renewed cerebral or renal complications.

At the time of writing the patient felt well and was working.

COMMENT

The case described is that of a patient with acute hyper-tension whose left kidney showed, besides an old infarct, freshlyinfarcted tissue. The granulation of the juxtaglomerularapparatus in the freshly infarcted area was strikingly morethan in the adjacent unaffected tissue. In addition, there wasevidence of mild hyperaldosteronism in the acute phase of thehypertension. These findings suggest that the hypertensionhad been brought on by segmental ischaemia-an assumptionsupported by the course of the disease. After more than a yearthe infarcted area was found to be clearly diminished and theliypertensionr had almost disappeared.

Besides hyperactivity of the juxtaglomerular apparatus thehistopathological examination had shown a second indication

for a renovascular cause of the hypertension. The freshlyinfarcted renal tissue had shown, as in the old infarct, the typeof ischaemic tubular atrophy first described by Fahr (1934)and later by others-for example, Kincaid-Smith (1955),Sheehan and Davis (1959), Brown et al. (1960), Alexander et al.(1961), and Heptinstall (1966). Characteristic of this type ofischaemia are narrowed tubules lined with cuboidal epithelium.Some authors consider this form of atrophy the only morpho-logical lesion typical of renal hvyertension (Howard et al..

1954; Lefebvre and Genest, 1960).These workers make a sharp distinctionbetween this tubular atrophy andatrophy characterized by dilated luminalined with flattened epithelial cells.Thus in cases of pyelonephritis thecuboidal type has been found inpatients with hypertension, and theflattened type in patients withouthypertension. Stamey (1963), in astudy dealing with 30 unquestionablecases of renovascular hypertension,reported the presence of this particularischaemic tubular atrophy in 20 cases,in 10 of which it was not accompaniedby increased granulation of the juxta-glomerular apparatus. The durationof hypertension was long in compari-son with the periods of only a fewweeks reported in experimental studies(Alexander et al., 1961) and in reportsnf assumed infarrctions duie tn ebrnhlism

(Fishberg, 1942 ; Ben-Asher, 1945).In a case of acute severe hypertension brought about by a

small segmental infarction nephrectomy means a serious lossof healthy renal tissue. For this reason, in cases of hyper-tension demonstrably due to segmental renal ischaemia theeffect of conservative treatment with antihypertensive drugsshould be awaited for a considerable period of time beforedeciding on nephrectomy.

The histological investigations were carried out by Dr. J. B. Al.Rensing, pathologist.

H. B. BENRAAD, M.D.,Head of Medical Department A, St. Canisius Hospital,

Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Th. J. BENRAAD, PH.D.,P. W. C. KLOPPFNBORG, M.D.,

Department of Medicine, St. Radboud Hospital, Uni-versity of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

REFERENCES

Alexander, N., Heptinstall, R. H., and Pickering, G. W. (1961). Journalof Pathology and Bacteriology, 81, 225.

Ben-Asher, S. (1945). Annals of Internal Medicine, 23, 431.Brown, J. J., Owen, K., Peart, W. S., Robertson, J. I. S., and Sutton, D.

(1960). British Medical Journal, 2, 327.Fahr, T. (1934). In Handbuch der speziellen pathologischen Anatomie

und Histologie, edited by 0. Lubarsch and F. Henke, vol. 6, part2, p. 809. Berlin, Springer.

Fishberg, A. M. (1942). Journal of the American Medical Association,119, 551.

Heptinstall, R. H. (1966). Pathology of the Kidney, p. 194. London,Churchill.

Howard, J. E., Berthrong, M., Gould, D. M., and Yendt, E. R. (1954).Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 94, 51.

Kincaid-Smith, P. (1955). Lancet, 2, 1263.Lefebvre, R., and Genest, J. (1960). Canadian Medical Association

Yournal, 82, 1249.Sheehan, H. L., and Davis, J. C. (1959). Journal of Pathology and Bac-

teriology, 77, 33.Stamey, T. A. (1963). Renovascular Hypertension, p. 50. Baltimore,

Williams and Wilkins.

on 22 January 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.

http://ww

w.bm

j.com/

Br M

ed J: first published as 10.1136/bmj.4.5680.408 on 15 N

ovember 1969. D

ownloaded from