1

Decentralized Planning Experience in

Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh

M.P. STATE PLANNING COMMISSIONM.P. STATE PLANNING COMMISSION

Overview

2

This presentation provides a This presentation provides a brief overview of sharing the model brief overview of sharing the model designed to rollout the Decentralized designed to rollout the Decentralized

Planning Process in the State Planning Process in the State

Present Status

3

Villages participated in process

Block plans

ULB plans

Districts plan

Remark

52000 313360(+ 6000 wards)

50

Online available in public domain

…….of preparation of various plan through decentralized approach

First ever…… First ever…… • Prioritizing Activities by COMMUNITY themselves .• Beneficiary identification during the planning process by GRAM SABHA.• Assessing status of Basic infrastructure of the state • Assessing status Delivery of services.

Key Sectors involved

4

Departments (No)

Development Schemes (No.)

Community Demands / Activities (No)

Remark

28 18010,00,000(Approx. )

Online available in public domain

Framework, Organizational Structures, Methods, Techniques, Tools Prescribed

5

“MP Model” (DPP structure) of Madhya Pradesh State Planning Commission ( Link A)

Technical Support System for Capacity building of Planning Units . (Link B)

Technical Support Groups for facilitation of planning processes ( Link C)

Methods, techniques, tools prescribed (LINK D)

Outputs of DPP

6

Village Master Plan (52,000 Plans )Village Panchayat Plan(23,000 Plans)Block level Plan (313 Plans)Districts Plan (50 Districts Plans)Rural and Urban Plan (Separate)Scheme specific plan (965 Plans) Example

RKVY-Dist. Morena

Sector Plans (06 Key Sectors )Department Plans (All ) Beneficiary identification.Planning & feedback mechanism (in

process).

Main Advantages of this Exercise

7

Ownership of plans & Involvement of stakeholders

Integrate participatory monitoring, evaluation and learning systems within the planning cycle itself

Prioritize planning in advance for all departments/schemes/sectors especially flagship programmes

Resource matching with “preferences of peoples’ demand” and “Departments’ pre-set targets”

Effective efficient use of through access to untied funds through village level plans like CDAP, NREGA, SSA, BRGF plan etc.

Achievement of sectoral goals (MDGs/ 11th 5yr. Plan) through convergence amongst departments and schemes

… Main Advantages

8

Enhance sensitivity and accountability towards preferences of people Build awareness level on schemesFeedback to improve scheme design

Transparency, Feed-back possible Provide opportunity to build capacities of grassroots level

govt. functionaries Ensure Social Inclusion. Scope of local innovation Identifying champions at every level of

implementation Driving convergences at the district level

Area of further Improvement (Quality issues)

9

Limited communication efforts specially mass communication

Convergence Role of elected representativesManaging and sustaining ChangeUrban Planning Integration of rural and urbanHuman Resources (inadequate)

Area of further Improvement (Quality issues)

10

Limited capacity building efforts : Strengthening of DPCs and District Planning Offices Capacity development of key Stake holders specially

in DPP, Acts, urban planning etc. Data management system Capacity Building in software application E- learning programmes

Empanelment of National experts /Quality Institutes

Inclusion of DPP section in other developmental modules

Way Forward …

11

Community based monitoring system -Social audit

Resource mapping as per the demand GIS based action monitoringAwards and appreciationsPolitical sensitization Strengthening of capacity of DPCs and key

stake holders

Thanks

12