www.tse.fi/pei the future of regions in the perspective of global change how to use the finnish...

74
www.tse.fi/pei THE FUTURE OF REGIONS IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF GLOBAL CHANGE How to use the Finnish inspiration to develop the RegioFutures Programme? Warsaw, June 9, 2008 Valtteri Kaartemo Pan-European Institute Turku School of Economics [email protected] Finland 2050

Upload: warren-alban-webster

Post on 16-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

www.tse.fi/pei

THE FUTURE OF REGIONS IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF GLOBAL CHANGE

How to use the Finnish inspiration to develop the RegioFutures Programme?

Warsaw, June 9, 2008

Valtteri KaartemoPan-European Institute

Turku School of Economics

[email protected]

Finland 2050

www.tse.fi/pei

Presentation outline

• Aim of the presentation

• Global change

• Future challenges of Finland

– Demographic change– Service sector

• Concluding remarks

www.tse.fi/pei

AIM

Dear Mr. Kaartemo,

Welcome to the June conference. Please consider in your presentation the question - how to use the Finnish inspiration to develop the Regio Futures Programme.

Please accept my best regards,

Antoni Kuklinski

www.tse.fi/pei

AIM elaborated

• The perspective of global change– Changes in the global division of labour– Demographic changes– Implications on the industry

www.tse.fi/pei

China and India keep on growing (CIA´s Long Term Growth Model)

www.tse.fi/pei

Projections of Finland and BSR

The role of China in the global change

www.tse.fi/pei

Global division of labour

Flow of low-competence jobs to low-cost and close-to-the-market countries likely to continue

Competition on knowledge-intensive sectors increasing

Global companies create new models for education

www.tse.fi/pei

Ennakointikulttuuri ja Suomi (World Economic Forum 1998-2005)

www.tse.fi/pei

Global crises (Oxford Analytica)Rank Global Stress Point

1 CHINA/TAIWAN: Armed hostilities (x)

2 US/IRAN: US strike on Iran (x)

3 INTERNATIONAL: Human avian flu pandemic (x)

4 UNITED STATES: Deep recession (x)

5 INTERNATIONAL: Oil price shock (x)

6 PAKISTAN: State collapse (x)

7 INTERNATIONAL: Return to protectionism (x)

8 INTERNATIONAL: Terrorist dirty bomb (x)

9 IRAQ: Collapse of state institutions (x)

10 INTERNATIONAL: Chemical/biological attack (x)

11 INDIA/PAKISTAN: Armed hostilities (x)

12 INTERNATIONAL: Commodity price bust (x)

13 RUSSIA: Return to regional ascendancy (x)

14LATIN AMERICA: Disruption to hydrocarbons sector (x)

15 LEBANON: Civil war (x)

16 ARGENTINA: New sovereign default (x)

17 NORTH KOREA: Military conflict (x)

18 NIGERIA: Large-scale disorder in the Delta (x)

19 HORN OF AFRICA: Regional conflagration (x)

20 CENTRAL ASIA: Risk of major disorder (x)

21 BALKANS: Return to serious disruption (x)

www.tse.fi/pei

Finland has three major challenges ahead:

• Globalisation • Competence competition• Ageing

Requires creativity, dynamic willingness and capability to reshaping

(SITRA 2006)

Finland’s challenges

www.tse.fi/pei

Key publications on the future of Finland and BSR

Finland:• Labour 2025• FinnSight 2015• Services 2020

Baltic Sea Region (BSR):• VASAB 2010 + 2030

www.tse.fi/pei

Strategic basic optionsfor Finland

1. Development through crisis

2. Decline without huge crisis

3. Controlled renewal process by exploiting future opportunities and by preventing future threats

SITRA (2005)

www.tse.fi/pei

Opportunities and threats can be found by analysing the changes in the operating environment

1. Trend analysis2. Scenario analysis3. Weak signals/wildcards

www.tse.fi/pei

Three basic methodsin foresight research:

Trend analysisOne or several dominating development process analysed

Scenario analysisSeveral alternatives described and analysed

Weak signal analysisUncertain but potentially high impact

www.tse.fi/pei

Globalistion

Technology waves

Social fragmentationAnd polarisation trends

Demographic changes

Challenges of sustainable development

Multilayered decision-makingin polictics andinternational politics

Economy globalises

Resource allocation changes andthe importance of economies of scale increases

Regional and social system: hierarchical, multi-centred or networked?

Changes in interaction between cities and rural areas (inner-city rural areas, peripheries)

Changes in the shape of cities

Changes in welfare state

Changes in social life

Risk society or ecological modernisation?

Megatrends and development processes

www.tse.fi/pei

Weak signals and wild cards

Weak signals may develop new opportunitieswhich other operators have not yet noticedin “the noise”

Affects companies directly or indirectly viabusiness environment

May provide opportunities and threats

Often underestimated by people who areaware of the phenomenon

Takes time before turns into “mainstream”

www.tse.fi/pei

Global megatrends

1. Economic changes as a result of globalisation and economic integration (impact of network economics)

2. Technological changes (ICT, biotechnology, and nanotechnological revolution as a result of technological convergence)

3. Social and cultural changes (social polarisation, subcultures, mobility, multicultural societies, ”woman power” -movement)

4. Demographical changes such as ageing and migration

5. Environmental changes and challenges

6. Political changes (increasing importance of international decision- making and security policy)

www.tse.fi/pei

Globalisation and economic change

• Hierarchical world cities

• Cross-border growth regions

• Development corridors (e.g. Northern Dimension Growth Triangle, E18, Tallinn-Helsinki)

• Importance of capital region in networking

• Global localisation

• Strategic importance of the growth of network economics

• EU’s region and development policies

• Global institutions and networks

www.tse.fi/pei

4 basic scenarios for Finland

A1: Globalising Finland: Rapid EU enlargement

A2: Finland as an unlimited resource exploiter: Breakdown of semi-federalist EU

B1: Finland of sustainable development:Slow EU enlargement

B2: Finland of local governance: Neglection of EU enlargement

www.tse.fi/pei

What if…

Globalising Finland

Unlimitedresourceexploiter

SustainabledevelopmentFinland

Local governanceFinland

Population

Migration

Labour force

R&D expenditure

Educationexpenditure

www.tse.fi/pei

What if…

GlobalisingFinland

Unlimitedresourceexploiter

SustainabledevelopmentFinland

Local governanceFinland

Population concentration

Mobility of people

Equality

Industrialconcentration

Entrepreneurship

www.tse.fi/pei

What if…

GlobalisingFinland

Unlimited resourceexploiter

SustainabledevelopmentFinland

LocalgovernanceFinland

Unemployment

Regional polarisation

Company taxation

Income taxation

Public health expenditure

www.tse.fi/pei

What if…

GlobalisingFinland

Unlimitedresourceexploiter

SustainableDevelopmentFinland

LocalgovernanceFinland

Socialexpenditure

Securityexpenditure

Public debt

Usage of renewing energy sources

Voting activity

www.tse.fi/pei

What if…

Globalising Finland

Unlimited resourceexploiter

Sustainable developmentFinland

LocalgovernanceFinland

Share of women in labour

Labour participation rate

Networking of people

Coal taxation

www.tse.fi/pei

Finland in structural change

• Structural change is not over after 15 years of drastic changes

• In 2020 less than 25% of labour force in industry, while in 1990 the share over 30%

• The share of service sector as an employer will climb up to 73% in 2020, while in 1990 the share about 60%

• Employment grows in electronics, business services, hotels and restaurants, private services, and health care and social services

• Employment continues to decrease in agriculture, manufacturing industry (apart from electronics), wholesales, finance, and public administration

www.tse.fi/pei

Important pointDecrease in employment is caused also by structural changes in the modes of companies which affects statistics

”Number employed in industry has not decreased significantly when outsourcing to service sector is counted”

”This development is different from may other countries”

Hannu Piekkola, ETLA

www.tse.fi/pei

Wild cards

Events and processes with low probability (often 10-20 %) of occurance but high impact (economic, social, political, ecological) on society and organisations

The following ten wild cards on Finland’s future were presented by Research Director Jari Kaivo-oja in August 2007

www.tse.fi/peiDM 24092204-2007 Copyright © Tekes

10 wild cards affecting Finland’seconomic and political environment

1. Sub-prime crisis into global depression

2. Fast accumulating crises from climate change

3. Russia’s new foreign policy

4. Ecological breakdown of China

5. Chaotic crisis of Pakistan and the involvement of India

www.tse.fi/peiDM 24092204-2007 Copyright © Tekes

10 wild cards affecting Finland’seconomic and political environment

6. Pandemias

7. Acute shortage of labour in Europe and uncontrolled immigration to Europe

8. Global recession caused by speculative money

9. The end of Nokia’s success

10. Crisis of welfare services

www.tse.fi/pei

NOTICE!

There may also be positivewild cards!

www.tse.fi/pei

Demographic change

www.tse.fi/pei

Global and regional competition for talents

www.tse.fi/pei

Decline in young population - loss of dynamic forces

www.tse.fi/pei

Age pyramids in Finland in 2003 and 2030

2003 2030

www.tse.fi/pei

Dependency ratio by 2050

www.tse.fi/pei

Demographic changeand its implications

• Where do aged population settle – cities or rural areas, Finland or migration

• Challenge of securing services for the aged – need for social and technology innovations

• Need for migrant workers in 2010s

• The future of welfare cluster

• Who takes care of the elder and the babies if shortage of labour in Finland?

• Competition for talents

www.tse.fi/pei

Social, health and educational costs

www.tse.fi/pei

Crisis coming before 2050?

The Ministry of Finance’s 2006 Stability Programme:

pensions- related expenditure rises from 11% of GDP in 2010 to 14% in 2030 and stays there until 2050

Public expenditure as a percentage of GDP will increase from 48% in 2010 to 58% in 2050

GDP growth rate that is expected to decline from 2.2% in 2010 to 1.4% by 2030 and stay there until 2050

public debt will rise from 35.8% of GDP in 2010 to an unsustainable 117.5% in 2050.

www.tse.fi/pei

McKinsey’s recipe

survival of the welfare system requires policies that will generate annual economic growth of “well over 2% – closer to 3%”

It is essential to strengthen . . . Finnish companies’ global competitiveness by improving productivity.

Action must be taken to create new jobs in growth sectors.

Financing of the country’s welfare services must be secured by raising the rate of employment.

www.tse.fi/pei

Growth in megacities

Lähde: CIA 2003

www.tse.fi/pei

Population centres in the Baltic Sea Region

www.tse.fi/pei

European engine cities

www.tse.fi/pei

Scenarios for regional structure in Finland

Deeply polarised: Development in favour of large centres and the zones between them. Death of small and mid-sized centres and rural areas

Multi-centred and balanced: More balanced than hierarchically strongly concentrated network of large and mid-sized cities. Successful regions in rural areas concentrate around these various centres

Decentralised regional structure: Activities and people move into small centres and periphery

Mustikkamäki and Viljamaa (2001)

www.tse.fi/pei

Change of population 2003-2030 by region in Finland

www.tse.fi/pei

Labour 2025

• “Full employment, high productivity and good jobs will provide the foundation for well being as the working age population diminishes”

• economic growth rate will slow down – but growth will continue, rise in the standard of

living

• employment in service sector will continue to increase– further decrease in primary production and

industry

www.tse.fi/pei

Labour 2025

• the most important objectives of economic and social policy are to maintain a high employment rate and a low unemployment rate

• balance of labour supply and demand

• in the 2010s the question will not be whether enough jobs can be created for a growing workforce, but whether new jobs can be created elsewhere in the economy as vacancies created by retirement remain unfilled in some businesses or other work communities.

www.tse.fi/pei

Change in labour market until 2050

www.tse.fi/pei

Strength of Europe? (World Bank 2007)

www.tse.fi/pei

Where will the workers come?

www.tse.fi/pei

Population development in Eurasia

www.tse.fi/pei

FinnSight 2015

• project examined the global and social change factors that have impact on Finnish business and society

• also aimed at identifying the future challenges of innovation and research activity

www.tse.fi/pei

FinnSight 2015

• The dynamics in the global division of labour are about to impact all the countries which have opened up to the global economy.

• In traditional industrialist states, the share of conventional industries on production and employment diminishes, and the role of service sector increases.

www.tse.fi/pei

Finnsight 2015

• the market for skilled workers is strongly globalising– possibilities to attract skillful workers to home country – but also raises the threat of braindrain to the countries

with the best working and living environment.

• balance of power within science and technology is shifting towards the emerging economies– the growth in emerging economies is likely to outpace

that of Europe and the United States.

• These issues have significant impact on Finland’s employment and international competitiveness.

• Already by 2015

www.tse.fi/pei

Services 2020

• “to anticipate the changes that will take place in the private service industry and the operational environment of the individual sectors, and to examine how these changes will be reflected in the competence requirements in the sectors being evaluated”

www.tse.fi/pei

Changes in the consumption pattern in Finland in 1900-2002: Towards service economy

59.2

12.9

6.42.9

12.45.3

46.0

8.6

10.2

5.5

19.6

7.3

16.0

28.7

28.7

14.7

3.44.9

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

1900 1913 1925 1938 1950 1964 1975 1990 1998 2002

Terveys

Huonekalut jatarvikkeetVaatteet ja jalkineet

Liikenne

Sekalaiset tarvikkeetja palvelutAsuminen ja energia

Ruoka ja juoma

www.tse.fi/pei

Trend towards service economy

www.tse.fi/pei

Challenges of service sector in Finland…

the share of services in GDP is lower than developed country average

Productivity in services is lower than European average

Less competition in service sector than European average

Higher prices in service sector than European average

Lower level of internationalisation than European average

Lower impact on employment than European average

-Productivity could be improved by developing services-Currently only 12% of R&D investments in services

www.tse.fi/pei

Dilemmas of innovation policy in Finland (service perspective)

Concentration on benchmarking ideas and one model in innovation processes

Technology needed in service innovations before taken seriously

No clear model on cross-border innovations

Not enough market research analysis in the phase of commercialisation

Too slow processes in support and administration

Research and knowledge in immaterial rights poorly developed on int’l level

Service design –knowledge is not on high level

Lack of capability in combining knowledge in franchising and logistics

www.tse.fi/pei

Special challenges (and opportunities) in franchising-business in Finland

Development of high-level research and competence

Combination of technological expertise in franchising

High-level competence in brand strategies

Specialisation in service innovations in franchising

Government support for development of expertise in marketing and customer service

Development of E-commerce models to support Finnish companies

www.tse.fi/peiDM 24092204-2007 Copyright © Tekes

Innovation challenges of service economy in Finland

• Need for regional service sector strategies

• Lack of innovative service firm clusters

• Lack of respect for service culture and service development

• Acceptance for the idea that technology not always needed for service innovation

• Problems in commercialisation of high tech and services

• Internationalisation of service companies must be improved

• Digitalisation and e-commerce should need more attention

• Also services should be able to brand and market

• Global market research should be more used in development of science and technology parks (tech push vs. market pull)

• Lack of understanding on service innovations in the eyes of financers (compared to Sweden and Denmark)

www.tse.fi/pei

Total entrepreneurial activity in 2004

www.tse.fi/pei

Co-operation in Nordic innovation policy

www.tse.fi/pei

1. Consumer Kids

2. Millennials at Work

3. Heteropolitans

4. MABYs

5. Boomers – branding to 60-100 year-olds

Lähde: Anterior Insight 2007

Trends in consumer market

www.tse.fi/pei

Challenges fromthe emergence of new technologies

www.tse.fi/pei

The development of Finlandin the future

• Even more innovation-driven society: vision of large campus – considered the best justified vision

• Finland as a network of science and technology parks,which is linked to global centres of competence

• Technological and social innovations in focus

• Increasing transparency of state borders and the development of the EU towards a federal state

• Finland becoming more multicultural society

• Climate change makes the climate in Finland warmer, more humid and more extreme weather conditions occur –change needed in agriculture and forestry to match the needs, growth in climate and environment business

www.tse.fi/pei

• Level of education further increases

• A part of Finland focuses on recreational services –whereas some focuses on a competence in certain sector

• Russia and the Baltic Sea Region remain important for the economy of Finland

• The development of the EU is crucial for Finland

• If entrepreneurship is not improved nationally, Finland as ”remote desktop”- and ”subsidiary”-economy

• Connections to globalising world increasingly important

• Current welfare state-model changes dynamically towards emphasis on the public-private -partnership

• Competence on nanotechnology and space science are important on a long-term

The development of Finlandin the future

www.tse.fi/pei

Finland is mostly unable to compete in low cost level

Possibilities are in innovation and competence

Finland remains as a home for most demanding goods and services

Finland produces what others can not

Competitiveness of business environment remains crucial to attract new investments

The development of Finlandin the future

www.tse.fi/pei

Summary of key statements in foresight publications

• With the current trend, the question on global division of labour is likely to become even more crucial for Finland.

• Need for RFP from the perspective of global change

www.tse.fi/pei

The importance ofasking the right question

• What is the question we aim at finding the answer?

• Finland 2050:– Economy

• Labour• Services

– Technology – Healthcare– Environment

+ Slovenia 2050 + Italy 2050 + Poland 2050…

• Interrelated but vast!

www.tse.fi/pei

Questions to be solved in the planning process

• Streamlined problematisation with a common vision

• What is the role of comparative studies internal to the study?

• What is the role of comparative studies external to the EuroFutures Programme?

www.tse.fi/pei

Concluding remarks

• What comes beyond service sector?

• We should concentrate on the issues which are likely to matter in 2050and present the ideas clearly

• Imagination needed from 2025 onwards– How can we deploy the best imagination

in Europe?

www.tse.fi/pei

Finnish inspiration for project outcomes

• regional centres for foresight research until 2025

• regional foresight forums (www.ennakointifoorumi.fi)(http://nff.risoe.dk/index.htm)until 2050

• Inter-regional co-operation in resource allocation

www.tse.fi/pei

Loop system

Europe 2050

region 2050 country 2050

region 2050 country 2050

region 2050 country 2050 world 2050

Europe 2050 world 2050

world 2050 Europe 2050

Loop between regions

Loop between methodologies

www.tse.fi/pei

Suggestions for next steps

• Funding instruments• Selection of partners• Concrete research plan

with measurable outcomes• Realistic budget and schedule

WE HAVE AN IMPORTANT PROGRAMMEAND WE SHOULD START ITBEFORE WE LOSE OUR MOMENTUM