wp3: integration of nanophotonics into c-si thin-film solar cells final review – m36 23 october...

55
WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

Upload: lora-maxwell

Post on 18-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36

23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

Page 2: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

2

Outline

confidential

1. Introduction

2. Materials and layer transfer2.1. Thin c-Si materials & properties 2.2. Transfer processes

3. Solar cells3.1. PolySilicon solar cells3.2. Epi-PECVD3.3. Epifoils3.4. Epifree

4. Summary & outlook

Page 3: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

3

WP goals

confidential

o Pattern with various techniques o of litho and etcho periodic and non-periodic

o Characterise the patternso Find how to passivate them

WP2

o Model various nanopatterned structures and extract their Jsc

o Give guidelines of optimal structures

o Gather reliable data for modelso Define benchmark structures

WP1

o Fabricate thin c-Si filmso Integrate nanopatterns into solar cells

and reach record Jsc valueso Demonstrate upscalability

WP3o Evaluate industrialiability of

nanopatterningo Evaluate their costs and footprinto Disseminate results and protect IP

WP4

Page 4: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

4confidential

Reminder WP1 & WP2

But challenging passivation of nanopatterned structures, WP2

Pseudo disorder is good High short circuit current

Good news from WP1

Page 5: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

5confidential

o Task 3.1 Production of thin c-Si absorber layerso Task 3.2 Fabrication of thin c-Si cells with one-side nanopatternso Task 3.3 Fabrication of record c-Si cells with optimal nanopatternso Task 3.4 Large-area nano-patterned solar cells

WP3

WP tasks and people to achieve them

Imec Ounsi, Christos, Islam, Xingyu, Twan, Kris, Jonathan, Hari, Valérie

INL Loic, Regis, Alain, Christian, Emmanuel, Romain, Mustapha

LPICM Romain, Skander, Wanghua, Gennaro, Ismael, Martin, Pere

Obducat Kidong, Babak

Chalmers Vladimir, Ines, Kristof, Sascha

Total Paul

Page 6: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

6

WP3 strategy for record cells

confidential

Get a “flavor”

First optimisation

Focus for record

D3.1

D3.2

D3.3

D3.4, D3.5

Page 7: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

7confidential

Objectives

Cell technology (Si thickness)

Voc(mV)

FF(%)

Jsc(mA/cm2)

Efficiency*(%)

Epifree (1µm) 600 78 30 14.0

PolySi (3µm) 580 77 30 13.4

Epi-PECVD Si films (4-6 µm) 650 78 32 16.2

Epifoils (40µm) 650 78 40 21.3

* Expected efficiencies at the end of the project

Achieved (target) model

Page 8: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

8

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.60

5

10

15

20

Voltage (V)

Current den-sity (mA/cm2)

unpatterned

2D PC

The integration challenge:Increasing Jsc without losing Voc and FF

JscmA/cm2

VocmV

FF%

Eff.%

Flat 12.8 548 66 4.6

2D PC 15.4 403 56 3.5

V. Depauw, IEEE J PV 2014

Page 9: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

2. Materials & layer transfer

confidential

Page 10: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

10confidential

Epifree – 1 µm• Some defects: creases (bumps) or some cracks• Possible development: thickening by epi growth

PolySi – 3 µm• Rough (200-500 nm RMS)• No development possible – using current stock

Epifoil – 40 µm• Issues of cracks when dicing into smaller pieces• Solution found: pick and place on glass when possible

Epi – PECVD @ 175 °C • Thicknesses in the range of 2 – 6 µm• Very smooth RMS of 2 – 4 nm

PECVD Epi-Si

C-Si wafer

Page 11: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

11confidential

Material Process T Pros Cons

Epifree (1µm) 1000 Very interesting optics Too thin ?

PolySi (3µm) 1000No transfer No waferHCL

QualityWet not possible

Epi-PECVD (4-6 µm) 200 Low TH incorporation Current Dep. rate

Epifoils (40µm) 1000 Hig qualityHigh rate

2.1 Thin c-Si Materials & properties

Page 12: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

2.2. Layer-transfer processes

confidential

Page 13: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

13

2.2 Layer-transfer processes= detachment + bonding

confidential

weak layer

Formation of a weak layer

in Si wafer

carrier

Bonding to foreign

substrate

Lift-offThin-film c-Si

or vice-versa

Page 14: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

14

A bonding “tool box”

confidential

Technique Strength Principle Pros Cons

Anodic Very highReaction

between glass and Si

(high V / T)

Easy post-processing

Strong constraints on materials (e.g.

flatness)

Silicone Low Print glue and cure

Transparent, releases

stress

Interferes with cell

processing

Kapton tape Low Sticky substrate

Quick and easy Weak bond

High-temperature

glueHigh Spin glue and

cureHigh T,

conductiveDefected

bonds

Ormostamp High Spin glue and cure

Transparent, resistant

New developmentPeel off issues

Page 15: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

15

DetachmentPorous silicon

confidential

1- Etching

1130°C

2- Annealing

High-T epitaxial Si

3- Film growthPSi

EpifreeEpifoil

Page 16: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

16

New method to produce a fragile interfacehydrogen-rich layer

confidential

Accumulation of H at interface

Page 17: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

17confidential

No detachment @ 400 ˚C

Detachment @ 300 ˚C

5 nm

substrate

epi

substrate

epi

5 nm

TEM -J.L. Maurice, LPICM

Epi-PECVD with porous interface

Correlation between epi-PECVD/c-Si interface porosity and possibility of lift-off

Page 18: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

18

epi-PECVD

confidential

1.5 µm epitaxial silicon bonded to Glass

Epi-Si

Glass

Page 19: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

19

Application of the tool box on films

confidential

Epifree Epifoil PECVD-Si

Anodic Ok, as long as polished, standard method

Ok, as long as polished

Ok, as long as low roughness

SiliconeNot ok, challenging Ok,

standard methodOk for bonding, lift off not successful

Kapton Ok, quality of lifted off layer needs to be kept

Not tested Ok, Transfer needs more development

HT glueNot ok Not tested

Not ok, further development needed

Ormostamp Not tested Not tested Not ok

Page 20: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

20

New materials: a-SiOx: and µc-SiOx:H combine: thermal stability, AR coating & high conductivity

confidential

Influence of Anodic bonding on passivation quality

Anodic bonding 250 C @1000V

Strong degradation for a-Si:H

Stable for a-SiOx

Ag

SubstrateAl

c-Si / p-type

i/n+ a-Si / ITO

µc-SiOxAl

Page 21: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

3 . So l ar C e l l s

3 .1 p o ly S i l i co n 3 .2 ep i -PEC VD 3 .3 ep i fo i l s3 .4 ep i - f ree

confidential

Page 22: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

22

Limitations from practical issues

confidential

Foil delamination at end of NILStrong adhesion between stamp and resist Some epifree stacks or PECVD-Si delaminate

Difficult optimization of wet-NILNIL resist has lower adhesion to sample surface than

hardmasks Reproducibility is needed for reaching high ff

Challenging process of nanopatterned epifoils IBC-cells require samples larger than NIL or HCL Even more complex detachment and processing

Page 23: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

23confidential

3.1. Poly-crystalline SiA rough film of 3-5 µm

Ag

Alumina substrate

p++ c-Sic-Si

a-Si/ITOAl

5 cm x 5 cm

alumina

1.1 cm x 1.1 cm cell

Page 24: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

24

PolySi is the perfect vehicle for HCL

confidential

HCLNIL

~ 75% area nanopatterned 100 % area nanopatterned

270 nm beads

Page 25: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

25

A good vehicle for HCL but the most limited in effi ciency

confidential

Higher absorption converted into higher Jsc

But Voc and FF are limited by polycrystalline nature

Texture Jsc

[mA/cm2]Voc

[mV]FF[%]

η[%]

Flat 10.1 456 57 2.6NIL 14.2 343 46 2.2HCL 16.3 403 46 3

Page 26: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

26confidential

3.2 Epi-PECVDA low temperature approach

PECVD Epi-Si

C-Si wafer

Page 27: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

27confidential

Flow chart for the fabricati on of nanostructured epi-PECVD Si solar cells

Cells on wafer: the easy test bench for material and patterning

Page 28: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

28confidential

First nanopatterned epi-PECVDEpi-PECVD LPICM NIL OBDUCAT wet etch IMEC Cell process LPICM

VOC [mV] Jsc [mA/cm2] FF [%]

Eff[%]

Ref. Flat 490 15.9 74.9 5.9

NIL pattern& wet etch 450 16 75 5.4

► Improvement paths:■ Optimize etching (dry and wet)■ New materials

Wet etch to be improved

Page 29: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

29

emitter etching Voc (mV) Jsc(mA cm-2) FF Eff. (%)

n-a-Siflat 492 15.9 74.9 5.9

dry 394 6.95 57.5 1.5

wet 501 19.93 79.2 7.8

Dry etching 140418-1@6

Wet etching 140418-1@4

Ref. without nanopatterns 140415-1@3

c-Si (p++)

n-a-Si

Al

ITOAg

epi 4 μmi-a-Si

Flat vs nanopatterns (NIL+ etching)

Page 30: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

30confidential

Detachment (450 ˚C; 5 min)

2 µm

Voc (mV)

Jsc

(mA cm-2) FF (%)

Eff.(%)

JV EQE

4 µm epi-Si on glass 342 19,9 18,8 56.2 3.8

(d)

Epi-Si

Al

ITO

Glass

Transferred epi-Si solar cells

Page 31: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

31

3.3 EpifoilA very-high quality “thick” film

confidential

Ti/Al

0.5 um

37 umSilicone

glass

ITO

c-Si:n (epifoil)

i/p+ aSi

Cu

i/n+ aSiITOCu

Page 32: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

32

A solar cell processed at module level, bonded with silicone

confidential

HJ-IBC cells are challenging to pattern first go for two-side contact cells

Ti/Al

Siliconeglass

ITO

c-Si:n (epifoil)

i/p+ aSi

Cu

i/n+ aSiITOCu

Page 33: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

33

Two-side contacted epifoilsEpitaxial foils on parent substrates

Front side processing:1. Texturing2. Passivation/FSF3. ARC4. Metallization

Ti/Pd/Ag

c-Si:n (epifoil)

c-Si (Parent substrate)

porous Si layer

Antireflective coating(nano-)textured surface

Front Surface Field

Bonding and detachmentwith silicone glue

Back side processing:1. Emitter2. Dielectric metal stack

Dicing

Silicone

Ti/Pd/Agglass

c-Si:n (epifoil)

glass

i/p+ aSi ITO

i/p+ aSi

Ti/Pd/Ag

Page 34: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

34

Nanopatterned Epifoil cells

224 nm 420 nm

544 nm

Sample Jsc*

[mA/cm2]Voc

[mV]FF

[%]Eta[%]

Deep Dry NIL 22.6 (30) 618 61 8.6

Medium Dry NIL 25.2 (30.8) 635 73 11.8

Shallow Dry NIL 24.7 (30.9) 670 76 12.5

Wet NIL 25.2 (32.6) 634 72 11.5

Random Pyramids 26.1 (32.6) 675 75 13.2

580 nm

3 um

Decrease in Voc, ff and efficiency

Dec

reas

e in

Voc

,ff a

nd e

ffici

ency

*Current in the parenthesis calculated by integrating the measured EQE

Page 35: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

35

300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 12000

102030405060708090

100

Random Pyramids Dry NILWet-NIL r2d03c03R02D05C04_3 R2D10c09

Wavelength (nm)

EQE,

A (%

)Nanopatterned Epifoil cells:Improved light trapping1) Better UV response for RP 2) Better performance for Wet NIL because of a

better optical vs electrical trade off3) Better light trapping for nanopatterning

13

2

Page 36: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

36

Epifoils into IBC solar cells?Too challenging in this time frame

confidential

Unsuccessful BSF passivation due to

silicone-resist interaction

Shorter term:

Two-side contacted w-NIL: 11.5%

IBC Dec 2014 w-NIL 6.8%

IBC April 2015 w-NIL 5.6%

Free-standing two-side contacted

Longer term: IBC!

Page 37: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

37

3.4 EpifreeThe thinnest crystalline-silicon cell

confidential

5 cm x 5 cm glass substrate

1 cm x 1 cm cell

Al

Ag a-Si/ITO

c-Si

Substrate

1 µm

Page 38: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

38

First integration in epifreeLIL and dry-etching

confidential

Higher absorptance and better trapping

Damage of electrical properties by

dry-etching

Strong losses in non-active layers

Ag

SubstrateAl

Alc-Si / p-type

i/n+ a-Si / ITO

Page 39: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

39

Integrati on of µc-SiOx:H as rear buff erOpti mised NIL with µc-SiOx:H reaches 6.5%

confidential

6.55%

3.98 %

NIL

µc-SiOx:H

Ag

SubstrateAl

c-Si / p-type

i/n+ a-Si / ITO

µc-SiOxAl

Page 40: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

40

µc-SiOx:H improved rear-side and new NIL stamp improved absorptance

confidential

µc-SiOx:H

Optimised NIL

Flat reference ucSiOx 800nm NIL

ucSiOx flat

ucSiOx 680nm NILoptimised

WP1

Page 41: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

41

Last epifree batchHCL or NIL and optimised emitter

confidential

Ag

SubstrateAl

c-Si / p-type

i/n+ a-Si / ITO

µc-SiOxAl

Improved emitter2 different thicknesses

HCL vs. NIL+ try wet-NIL

Rear passivation

Dry-NIL Dry-HCL Wet-NIL (failed)

Page 42: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

42

J-V performancesGood reproducibility and the record cell

confidential

Jsc to be certified

µc-SiOx:H

Wet-NIL

dry-NIL

dry-HCL 9.58 %

Page 43: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

43

Impact of thinner emitter is clear at spectral response

confidential

300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 12000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Wavelength (nm)

EQE,

1--R

(%)

.... but EQE is higher at front

Similar reflectance...

Dry-HCL thin emitterDry-HCL thick emitter

Page 44: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

44

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.60

5

10

15

20

25

Voltage (V)

Current density (mA/cm2)

Successful integration into 1.1 µm c-Siepifreeback side passivati on patt erning emitt er and passivati on

~ modeled max

Softer slopes + µc-SiOx:H rear buffer

Disorder + thinner front a-Si:H

9.6%

3.5%

2D PC

Unpatterned

Page 45: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

45confidential

Summary on solar cells and effi ciencies

Cell technology (Si thickness)

Voc(mV)

FF(%)

Jsc(mA/cm2)

Efficiency*(%)

Epifree (1µm) 600 78 21 (30) 23 9.6 (14)

PolySi (3µm) 580 77 16.3 (30) 13.4

Epi-PECVD Si films (4-6 µm) 650 78 20* (32) 30 16.2

Epifoils (40µm) 650 78 29 (40) 37-39 21.3

* Expected efficiencies achievable at the end of the project

Achieved (target) model

* Non patterned

Page 46: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

46

Summary on Materials and cell effi ciencies

confidential

Effici

ency

(%)

Epifr

ee

Epi-P

ECVD

Epifoil

Page 47: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

47

Higlight (1)

confidential

Developped strong know how on epi-PECVD interface

Correlation between epi-PECVD/c-Si interface porosity and lift-off

Page 48: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

48

Highlight (2)

confidential

a-SiOx:H and µc-SiOx:H layers combine:- good passivation, high thermal stability,- tunable refractive index- high conductivity

Passivation preserved after anodic bonding

Page 49: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

49

Highlight (3)

confidential

Dry NIL 29.2 mA/cm2

Random pyramids 24.1 mA/cm2

Epifoil: successful integration !

Page 50: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

50

Highlight (4)

confidential

Record efficiency for ultrathin nanopatterned epifree solar cell

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.60

5

10

15

20

25

Voltage (V)

9.6%

Cu

rre

nt d

en

sity

(m

A/c

m2 )

Page 51: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

51

Outlook

confidential

Integration of a-SiOx:H and µc-SiOx:H materials in current c-Si solar cells

Further work on epi-PECVD, in particular aiming at higher deposition rates

Continue the development of IBC epifoil solar cells

Epi-PECVD transfer know how for PV and micro-electronics

… and much more to come

Page 52: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

nanophotonics for ultra-thin crystalline silicon photovoltaics

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No 309127

Page 53: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

53confidential

First round of patterned cells: Current status

Cell technology (Si thickness)

Voc(mV)

FF(%)

Jsc(mA/cm2)

Efficiency*(%)

Epifree (1µm) 600 78 16 (30, 25) 24 14.0

PolySi (3µm) 580 77 16.3 (30, 30) 13.4

Epi-PECVD Si films (4-6 µm) 650 78 20 (32, 31) 35 16.2

Epifoils (40µm) 650 78 29 (40, 39) 39 21.3

* Expected efficiencies achievable at the end of the project

Achieved (target, go/no-go) model

MS6 (Month 21). Decision on patterning techniques for each cell techno

Page 54: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

54© IMEC 2012

Surface passivation is critical

V. DEPAUW - SPIE PHOTONICS BRUSSELS 2012

c-Si - τ bulk W

S (Surf. Recom. Velocity)

1/τeff = 1/τbulk + 2S/W

S= 50 cm/s

10 cm/s

5 cm/s

1 µm

10 µ

mW

=10

0 µm

Thin mono c-Si dominated by surface

Nano and micro c-Si

Page 55: WP3: Integration of nanophotonics into c-Si thin-film solar cells Final review – M36 23 October 2015, La Defense, Paris

55confidential