with non-potable ground water, for residential property ... 221747.pdf · certification date...

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 221747

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a

notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own

due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the

Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site

Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry

of the Environment and Climate Change.

Record of Site Condition Number 221747Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2016/03/29Certification Date 2016/02/17Current Property Use ResidentialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Non-potable Ground Water, for Residentialproperty use

Property Municipal Address 1571 LAKESHORE ROAD WEST,MISSISSAUGA, ON, L5J 1J4, 1601LAKESHORE ROAD WEST, MISSISSAUGA,ON, L5J 1J4, 1575 LAKESHORE ROAD WEST,MISSISSAUGA, ON, L5J 1J4

1 of 21Filed Record of Site Condition # 221747 on 2016/03/29

Part 1: Property Ownership, Property Information and Owner’s Certifications

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the record of site condition

Owner name VANDYK-THE CRAFTSMAN LIMITED

Authorized person JOHN C. VANDYK

Mailing address 1944 FOWLER DRIVE, MISSISSAUGAOntario, Canada

Postal Code L5K 0A1

Phone (905) 823-4606

Fax (905) 823-4014

Email address [email protected]


Record of site condition property location information

Municipal address(es) 1601 LAKESHORE ROAD WEST, MISSISSAUGA, ON L5J 1J41575 LAKESHORE ROAD WEST, MISSISSAUGA, ON L5J 1J41571 LAKESHORE ROAD WEST, MISSISSAUGA, ON L5J 1J4

Municipality Mississauga

Legal description See attached Lawyer’s letter

Assessment rollnumber(s)

05020241190000000305020024120000000010502002412100000009

Property identifiernumber(s)

13477-0792 (LT)

Record of site condition property geographical references

Coordinate system UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 611,438.00

Northing 4,819,556.00

Record of site condition property use information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercialuse, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current property use Residential

Intended property use Residential

Certificate of propertyuse has been issuedunder section 168.6 ofthe EnvironmentalProtection Act

No


Please see the signed statements of property owner, or agent,or receiver at the end of this record of site condition

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


Part 2: List of reports, summary of site conditions and qualified person’sstatements and certificationsQualified person's information

Name BENNETT SUN

Type of licence underProfessionalEngineers Act

Licence

Licence number 45032505

Quallified person'semployer name

SOIL ENGINEERS LTD.

Mailing address 100 NUGGET AVENUE, TORONTOOntario, M1S 3A7 Canada

Phone (416) 754-8515

Fax (416) 754-8516

Email address [email protected]

Municipal information

Local or single-tiermunicipality

Mississauga

Upper-tier municipality Peel

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office

District office Halton-Peel District Office

District office address 4145 North Service Road, Suite 300, Burlington ON L7L 6A3


Phase one environmental site assessment reportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updatesin submitting the record of site condition for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissancecomponents of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(yyyy/mm/dd)

2015-09-14

Type of report Report title Date of report(yyyy/mm/dd)

Authorof report

Name of consultingcompany

Phase oneenvironmentalsite assessment

Phase One Environmental Site Assessment,Proposed Mixed-Use 4 Storey Condominiumwith 1-Level Underground Parking, 1601Lakeshore Road West, City of Mississauga,Reference No. 1202-S031E

2012-03-12 Ian Chiu, P.Eng.,Anthony C.K. Ching., P.Eng., andSamuel Lee,B.Sc.

SOIL ENGINEERS LTD.

Update tophase oneenvironmentalsite assessment

Updated Phase One Environmental SiteAssessment, Proposed Residential andCommercial Development, 1571, 1575 and1601 Lakeshore Road West, City ofMississauga, Reference No. 1508-E067

2015-10-09 BennettSun, P.Eng.,QPESA,Samuel Lee,B.Sc., andJennifer Fu,B.A.Sc., E.I.T.,

SOIL ENGINEERS LTD.

Reports and other documents related to the phase one environmental site assessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A orotherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment

Report title Date of report(yyyy/mm/dd)

Authorof report


N/A


Phase two environmental site assessment reportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updatesin submitting the record of site condition for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the siteinvestigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(yyyy/mm/dd)

2016-02-17

Type of report Report title Date of report(yyyy/mm/dd)

Authorof report


Phase twoenvironmentalsite assessment

Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment,Proposed Residential and CommercialDevelopment, 1571, 1575 and 1601Lakeshore Road West, City of Mississauga,Reference No. 1508-E067

2015-10-28 BennettSun, P.Eng.,QPESA andSamuel Lee,B.Sc.

SOIL ENGINEERS LTD.

Update tophase twoenvironmentalsite assessment

Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentUpdate, Proposed Residential andCommercial Development, 1571, 1575 and1601 Lakeshore Road West, City ofMississauga, Reference No. 1508-E067

2016-02-24 BennettSun, P.Eng.,QPESA andSamuel Lee,B.Sc.

SOIL ENGINEERS LTD.

Reports and other documents related to the phase two environmental site assessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the record of site condition for thepurposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report title Date of report(yyyy/mm/dd)

Authorof report


N/A


Environmental condition

Section 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? Yes

Site condition information

Certification date (yyyy/mm/dd) 2016/02/17

Total area of record of site condition property (in hectares) 0.15000

Number of any previously filed record of site condition that applies to anypart of the record of site condition property

Number of any previously filed transition notice that applies to any part of therecord of site condition property

Soil texture

Assessment/restoration approach Full depth generic

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of groundwater?

Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on,in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg.153/04?

Yes

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, inor under the property which is used in the record of site condition?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, groundwater or sediment

AGAT LABORATORIES AND MAXXAMANALYTICS

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable

Applicable site condition standard TABLE 9

Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2016/02/22

Upper-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2016/02/22


Table 1 – Maximum contaminant concentrations compared to applicable site condition standards

Measured concentration for contaminants in soil

Contaminantname

Maximumconcentration

Applicable siteconditionstandard

Unit ofmeasure

1 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

2 Bromoform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

3 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

4 Acetone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

5 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

6 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

7 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

8 Chloroform < 0.04 0.05 µg/g

9 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g



12 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

13 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

14 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.03 0.05 µg/g

15 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

16 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

18 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.03 0.05 µg/g

19 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.04 0.05 µg/g

20 Ethylene dibromide < 0.04 0.05 µg/g

21 Hexane (n) < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

22 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

23 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

24 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

25 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

26 Styrene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

27 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.04 0.05 µg/g

28 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

29 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

30 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

31 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.04 0.05 µg/g

32 Trichloroethylene < 0.03 0.05 µg/g

33 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 0.25 µg/g

34 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

35 Benzene < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

...Continued on next page




Continued from previous page....

Contaminantname



Unit ofmeasure

36 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

37 Toluene < 0.05 0.2 µg/g

38 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

39 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 10 25 µg/g

40 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 10 µg/g



43 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.81 1.5 µg/g

44 Chromium VI < 0.2 0.66 µg/g

45 Cyanide (CN-) 0.03 0.051 µg/g

46 Electrical Conductivity 0.47 0.7 mS/cm

47 Mercury 0.16 0.27 µg/g

48 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 1.2 5

49 Acenaphthene < 0.05 0.072 µg/g

50 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 0.093 µg/g

51 Anthracene < 0.05 0.22 µg/g

52 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.05 0.36 µg/g

53 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.05 0.3 µg/g

54 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.47 µg/g

55 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.05 0.68 µg/g

56 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.48 µg/g

57 Chrysene < 0.05 2.8 µg/g

58 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.1 µg/g

59 Fluoranthene < 0.05 0.69 µg/g

60 Fluorene < 0.05 0.19 µg/g

61 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.05 0.23 µg/g

62 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.05 0.59 µg/g

63 Naphthalene < 0.05 0.09 µg/g

64 Phenanthrene < 0.05 0.69 µg/g

65 Pyrene < 0.05 1 µg/g

66 Aldrin < 0.005 0.05 µg/g

67 Chlordane < 0.007 0.05 µg/g

68 DDD < 0.016 0.05 µg/g

69 DDE < 0.007 0.05 µg/g

70 DDT < 0.005 1.4 µg/g






Contaminantname



Unit ofmeasure

71 Dieldrin < 0.005 0.05 µg/g

72 Endosulfan < 0.005 0.04 µg/g

73 Endrin < 0.005 0.04 µg/g

74 Heptachlor < 0.005 0.05 µg/g

75 Heptachlor Epoxide < 0.005 0.05 µg/g

76 Hexachlorobenzene < 0.005 0.02 µg/g

77 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.01 0.01 µg/g

78 Hexachlorocyclohexane Gamma- < 0.005 0.01 µg/g

79 Hexachloroethane < 0.01 0.01 µg/g

80 Methoxychlor < 0.005 0.05 µg/g

81 Barium 21 220 µg/g

82 Beryllium < 0.5 2.5 µg/g

83 Boron (total) < 5 36 µg/g

84 Cadmium < 0.5 1.2 µg/g

85 Chromium Total 7 70 µg/g

86 Cobalt 3.3 22 µg/g

87 Copper 12 92 µg/g

88 Lead 15 120 µg/g

89 Molybdenum < 0.5 2 µg/g

90 Nickel 6 82 µg/g

91 Silver < 0.2 0.5 µg/g

92 Thallium < 0.4 1 µg/g

93 Uranium < 0.5 2.5 µg/g

94 Vanadium 12 86 µg/g

95 Zinc 25 290 µg/g

96 Antimony < 0.8 1.3 µg/g

97 Arsenic 5 18 µg/g

98 Selenium < 0.5 1.5 µg/g


Table 1 – Maximum contaminant concentrations compared to applicable site condition standards (Continued)

Ground water

Contaminantname



Unit ofmeasure

1 Barium 89.3 23000 µg/L

2 Beryllium 0.5 53 µg/L

3 Boron (total) 7,650 36000 µg/L

4 Cadmium < 0.2 2.1 µg/L

5 Chromium Total 2.8 640 µg/L

6 Cobalt 0.8 52 µg/L

7 Copper 1.7 69 µg/L

8 Lead < 0.5 20 µg/L

9 Molybdenum 177 7300 µg/L

10 Nickel < 1 390 µg/L

11 Silver < 0.2 1.2 µg/L

12 Thallium < 0.3 400 µg/L

13 Uranium 2.9 330 µg/L

14 Vanadium 0.5 200 µg/L

15 Zinc < 5 890 µg/L

16 Antimony < 0.5 16000 µg/L

17 Arsenic < 1 1500 µg/L

18 Selenium 21.7 50 µg/L

19 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 420 µg/L

20 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L



23 Acetone < 1 100000 µg/L

24 Bromomethane < 0.2 5.6 µg/L

25 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L

26 Chlorobenzene < 0.1 500 µg/L

27 Chloroform < 0.2 2.4 µg/L

28 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.1 4600 µg/L



31 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.2 3500 µg/L

32 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.3 320 µg/L

33 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

34 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.3 1.6 µg/L

35 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L




Ground water


Contaminantname



Unit ofmeasure

36 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

37 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.2 16 µg/L

38 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.3 5.2 µg/L

39 Ethylene dibromide < 0.1 0.25 µg/L

40 Hexane (n) < 0.2 51 µg/L

41 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 1 470000 µg/L

42 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 1 140000 µg/L

43 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.2 190 µg/L

44 Methylene Chloride 0.3 610 µg/L

45 Styrene < 0.1 1300 µg/L

46 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.1 3.3 µg/L

47 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.1 3.2 µg/L

48 Tetrachloroethylene 0.2 1.6 µg/L

49 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.3 640 µg/L

50 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.2 4.7 µg/L

51 Trichloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

52 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.4 2000 µg/L

53 Vinyl Chloride < 0.17 0.5 µg/L

54 Benzene < 0.2 44 µg/L

55 Ethylbenzene < 0.1 1800 µg/L

56 Toluene < 0.2 14000 µg/L

57 Xylene Mixture < 0.2 3300 µg/L

58 Acenaphthene < 0.2 600 µg/L

59 Acenaphthylene < 0.2 1.4 µg/L

60 Anthracene < 0.1 1 µg/L

61 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.2 1.8 µg/L

62 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.01 0.81 µg/L

63 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.1 0.75 µg/L

64 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.2 0.2 µg/L

65 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.1 0.4 µg/L

66 Chrysene < 0.1 0.7 µg/L

67 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.2 0.4 µg/L

68 Fluoranthene < 0.2 73 µg/L

69 Fluorene < 0.2 290 µg/L

70 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.2 0.2 µg/L




Ground water


Contaminantname



Unit ofmeasure

71 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.2 1500 µg/L

72 Naphthalene < 0.2 1400 µg/L

73 Phenanthrene < 0.1 380 µg/L

74 Pyrene < 0.2 5.7 µg/L

75 Sodium 30,600 1800000 µg/L

76 Bromodichloromethane < 0.2 67000 µg/L

77 Bromoform < 0.1 380 µg/L

78 Dibromochloromethane < 0.1 65000 µg/L

79 Chloride 17,600 1800000 µg/L

80 Chromium VI < 5 110 µg/L

81 Cyanide (CN-) < 2 52 µg/L

82 Mercury < 0.02 0.29 µg/L


Remedial action and mitigation

Remediated soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the record of site condition property that havebeen remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil.Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identifiedprocess.

Soil remediation process Estimated quantity of soil (in ground-volume in cubic metres)

Description of remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under therecord of site condition property.

Remedial excavation was conducted and the impacted soil was removed from the RSC property

Soil or sediment removed and not returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the record of site condition property.

Estimated quantity of soil (in ground-volume in cubic metres) 1,542.0

Estimated quantity of sediment (in ground-volume in cubic metres)

Soil brought to the property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the record of sitecondition property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the record of sitecondition property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated quantity of soil brought to the property(in ground-volume in cubic metres)


Ground water control or treatment measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the record of site condition property prior to thecertification date for the purpose of submitting the record of site condition for filing.

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the record of site condition property after thecertification date.

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the record of site condition property.

Estimated volume of ground water (in litres)


Other activities including risk management measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the record of site condition for filing,were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the record ofsite condition property.

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release ormovement of known existing contaminants at the record of site condition property.

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or controlworks for known existing contaminants, if any, on the record of site condition property, after the certification date.

Ground water management measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring orcontrol works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the record of site condition property, after the certificationdate.

Remediated or removed soil, sediment or ground water from near property boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the record of site condition property that is or waslocated within 3 metres of the record of site condition property boundary been remediated orremoved for the purpose of remediation?

Yes


D Qualified person’s statements and certifications

As the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the record of site condition property, which includes the evaluationof the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updatesrequired, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualifiedperson as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the record of site condition property, which includes the evaluationof the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updatesrequired, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualifiedperson as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only andthe conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2016/02/17, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment andthe phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of anycontaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the record of site condition property thatwould interfere with the type of property use to which the record of site condition property will be put, asspecified in the record of site condition.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under thesupervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given writtennotice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the localmunicipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which theproperty is located.

As of 2016/02/17, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental siteassessments and any confirmatory sampling, the record of site condition property meets the applicable full depthgeneric site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribedby the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this record of site condition is filed,except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this record of site condition at Table 2, maximum contaminantconcentrations compared to standards specified in a risk assessment.

As of 2016/02/17, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sedimentand ground water at the record of site condition property for which sampling and analysis has been performedis specified in this record of site condition at Table 1, maximum contaminant concentrations compared toapplicable full depth generic site condition standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the record of site condition will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, thatrecords of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that theRegistry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to considerconducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in additionto reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this record of site condition are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordancewith generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineeringor science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer SOIL ENGINEERS LTD.does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the record of site condition property orany property which includes the record of site condition property and was the subject of a phase one orenvironmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based.

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the record of sitecondition are true as of 2016/02/17.

By signing this record of site condition, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, BENNETT SUN,


By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, BENNETT SUN,a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2016/03/18:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I agree


Additional documentation provided by property owner or agent

The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition

Certificate of status or equivalent for the owner

Lawyer's letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the record of site condition property wasacquired

A Current plan of survey

A copy of no objection statement from municipality

Area(s) of potential environmental concern

Table of current and past uses of the phase one property

Phase 2 conceptual site model

Owner or agent certification statements

7.8.3


Request ID: 018680474 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2016/02/29Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le :Transaction ID: 60391351 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 08:26:07Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à :Category ID: CTCatégorie :

CERTIFICATE OF STATUSATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE

This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère desrecords of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestonsServices que la société

V A N D Y K - T H E C R A F T S M A N L I M I T E D

Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)

0 0 2 2 8 6 9 7 4

is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou néeamalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de lathe laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.

The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le

J U N E 0 1 J U I N , 2 0 1 1

and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.

Dated Fait le

F E B R U A R Y 2 9 F É V R I E R , 2 0 1 6

DirectorDirecteur

The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.

La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

Phase Two Property and RSC PropertyPhase One Property

Reference No. 1508-E067

"TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN" (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)

Area of Potential

Environmental

Concern

Location of Area of

Potential

Environmental

Concern on Phase

One Property

Potentially Contaminating

Activity

Location of

PCA (on-site or

off-site)

Contaminants of Potential

Concern

Media Potentially

Impacted (Groundwater,

soil and/or sediment)

APEC1 (Fill Material

of Unknown Quality)

Southern portion of

the subject site

30. Importation of Fill

Material of Unknown

Quality

On-site

Metals, As, Ar, Hg, Cr VI,

CN-, B(HWS), pH, EC and

SAR, Petroleum Hycarbon

(PHCs), Volatile Organic

Compounds (VOCs),

Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbon (PAHs)

Soil and/or Groundwater

APEC 2 (Potential

environmental concern

due to landfill site to

the north of the subject

site)

Northern portion of

the subject site

58. Waste Disposal and

Waste Management,

including transfer of waste,

other than use of biosoils as

soil condition

Off-site

Metals, As, Ar, Hg, Cr VI,

CN-, B(HWS), pH, and

PAHs

Soil and/or Groundwater

APEC 3 (Potential use

of pesticides due to

former orchard activity

at the adjacent property

to the north of the

subject site)

Northeastern portion

of the Phase One

Property

40. Pesticides (including

Herbicides, Fungicides and

Anti-Fouling Agents)

Manufacturing, Processing,

Bulk Storage and Large-

Scale Application

Off-Site

Ar, CN-, Metals and

Organochlorinated

Pesticides (OCPs)

Soil


"TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY" (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)

PIN: part of 13447-0792 (LT) – 1601 Lakeshore Road West (Part 2, Part 3 and Part 15 on plan of survey prepared by Rady-

Pentek & Edward Surveying Ltd., dated October 22, 2015)

Year Name of Owner

Description of

Property Use Property Use

Other Observations from Aerial

Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, etc.

2014 - current Vandyk – The Craftsman Limited

2014 - 2014 Vandyk – Westwind on the Park Ltd.

2009 - 2014 2286974 Ontario Inc.

2008 - 2009 Meridian Credit Union Limited

2005 - 2008 Clarkson Manors Inc.

Vacant land

associated with

construction

activities

Based on 2015 aerial photograph and site

reconnaissance, the subject site is a

construction site with a condominium

sales centre at the southern corner.

Residential

dwellings

Residential

Property Use Based on 1960 aerial photograph, no

farmland was observed at the site. It is

most likely that the property has been

mainly used for residential purposes,

1944 - 2005 J. Ternwith Based on the 1954 aerial photographs,

agricultural land with residential dwellings

were located at the subject site. An

orchard is located at adjacent property to

the northwest.

1921 - 1944 W. S. Davis

1913 - 1921 M. J. Burke

Agricultural

lands with

residential

dwellings

1884 – 1913 A. B. Harries

1837 - 1884 J. B. Harris

1835 – 1837 G. Truscott

1835 - 1835 E. Neave

Prior to 1835 The Crown

Farmland

Agricultural and

other use No aerial photograph or Fire Insurance

Plan is available. Based on 1877 Historical

Map, it is likely that the site was used for

agricultural and residential purposes.




Year Name of Owner

Description of






2009 - 2014 2286974 Ontario Inc.



Vacant land

associated with

construction

activities





1968 - 2005 J. Eby Residential

dwellings

Residential









the northwest.

1921 - 1944 W. S. Davis

1913 - 1921 M. J. Burke

Agricultural

lands with

residential

dwellings

1884 – 1913 A. B. Harries

1837 - 1884 J. B. Harris

1835 – 1837 G. Truscott

1835 - 1835 E. Neave


Farmland

Agricultural and








Year Name of Owner

Description of






2009 - 2014 2286974 Ontario Inc.



Vacant land

associated with

construction

activities





1968 - 2005 I. McArthur Residential

dwellings

Residential









the northwest.

1921 - 1944 W. S. Davis

1913 - 1921 M. J. Burke

Agricultural

lands with

residential

dwellings

1884 – 1913 A. B. Harries

1837 - 1884 J. B. Harris

1835 – 1837 G. Truscott

1835 - 1835 E. Neave


Farmland

Agricultural and





Phase Two Conceptual Site Model Reference No. 1508-E067

1571, 1575 and 1601 Lakeshore Road West Page 1 of 13

City of Mississauga

INTRODUCTION

This Phase Two Conceptual Site Model has been prepared as a part of Phase Two Environmental

Site Assessment (Phase Two ESA) by Soil Engineers Ltd. (SEL) for the RSC Property located at

1571, 1575 and 1601 Lakeshore Road West, in the City of Mississauga (hereinafter referred to as

“subject site”).

The Phase Two Conceptual Site Model is based on the findings of the Phase One ESA by SEL

(Reference No. 1508-E067, dated October 9, 2015). Phase Two ESA (Reference No. 1508-E067,

dated October 28, 2015), and Phase Two ESA Update (Reference No. 1508-E067, dated

February 24, 2016) for the subject site.

6.10 Phase Two Conceptual Site Model

The Phase Two Conceptual Site Model is prepared based on the findings of the Phase One ESA

and this Phase Two ESA.

6.10.1 Description and Assessment

The subject site is irregular in shape and approximately 0.15 ha (0.37 ac) in area. The Property

Identification Number (PIN) is part of 13477-0792 (LT). The municipal address of the subject

site is 1571, 1575 and 1601 Lakeshore Road West. The legal description of the subject site is

Part of Lot 27, Concession 2, South of Dundas Street, Township of Toronto, City of Mississauga,

Regional Municipality of Peel designated as Parts 2, 3 and 15, on plan of survey prepared by

Rady-Pentek & Edward Surveying Ltd., dated October 22, 2015.



City of Mississauga 6.10.1.1 Areas where Potentially Contaminating Activity Has Occurred

Potentially Contaminating Activities (PCAs) were identified at the subject site and in the Phase

One Study Area based on records review, interviews and Site reconnaissance. The areas of

PCAs along with the corresponding list in Table 2 Schedule D of O. Reg. 153/04 are summarized

below:

On-Site PCAs:

• Unknown quality of fill material at the subject site, based on the information from the

previous geotechnical investigation and Phase Two report - #30 Importation of Fill

Material of Unknown Quality.

Off-Site PCAs:

• Potential long-term use of pesticides as part of the former orchard activity at the adjacent

property to the immediate north of the subject site - #40 Pesticides (including Herbicides,

Fungicides and Anti-Fouling Agents) Manufacturing, Processing, Bulk Storage and

Large-Scale Applications.

• Former underground storage tank (UST) for heating fuel oil at 1601 Lakeshore Road

West (approximately 55 m northeast of the subject site, trans-gradient) - #28 Oil Storage

in Fixed Tanks.

• A waste disposal record of a former landfill site located at the adjacent property to the

north of the subject site - #58 Waste Disposal and Waste Management, including thermal

treatment, landfilling and transfer of waste other than use of biosoils as soil conditioners.

• Two (2) records of spill incident located approximately 110 m east of the subject site -

#58 Waste Disposal and Waste Management, including thermal treatment, landfilling and

transfer of waste other than use of biosoils as soil conditioners.



City of Mississauga A total of one (1) on-site PCAs and four (4) off-site PCAs were identified within the Phase One

Study Area, including on-site PCAs for unknown fill quality; the off-site PCA for possible use of

pesticides during former farming activities and former landfill site which might have contributed

to the Areas of Potential Environmental Concerns at the subject site. However, the identified

off-site PCAs for former UST and spill records were not considered to have contributed to the

Area of Potential Environmental Concern at to the subject site due to the relative distance of the

PCA and being located down-gradient or trans-gradient from the subject site. The locations of

the PCAs are shown in the Drawing No. 1.

6.10.1.2 Areas of Potential Environmental Concern

The following Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APECs) were identified at the subject

site:

APEC 1: Potential soil and groundwater impact at the southern section of the subject site

due to fill material of unknown quality.

APEC 2: Potential soil and/or groundwater impact from adjacent property to the north of

the subject site due to former landfill site.

APEC 3: Potential soil impact from the use of pesticides as part of the former orchard

activity at the adjacent property to the north of the subject site.

The APECs are shown on Drawing No. 2.

6.10.1.3 Subsurface Structures and Utilities

At the time of the assessment, the subject site was a vacant land associated with construction

activities and the topsoil layer had been stripped and removed from the subject site.

There is an active stormwater pipeline connecting to Turtle Creek, at the southern section of the

subject site.



City of Mississauga Based on the Phase One ESA record review, no structure was located at the subject site.

Based on the Phase Two ESA findings, the contaminated area is located at the southern section

of the subject site, near the stormwater pipeline. The groundwater flow is generally to the east.

Therefore, this underground utility has the potential to affect contaminants distribution or

transport at the subject site.

6.10.2 Physical Setting

6.10.2.1 Stratigraphy

The subject site is located on the Glaciolacustrine deposits (sandy) where glacial till dominates

the soil stratigraphy. In places the drift has been modified by the water action of Peel Ponding

(glacial lake), partially eroded, and filled with lacustrine sand, silt, clay and/or interglacial out

wash sands. A geological map of the area was located at the Geological Survey of Canada

Website and indicates that the subject site is underlain predominantly by coarse textured soils

(i.e. silty sand) formed on till. The depth to bedrock in the general vicinity of the Phase Two

Property is approximately 10 mbgs.

The drilling investigation for this Phase Two ESA consisted of three (3) boreholes ranging from

depths of 5.3 mbgs to 6.1 mbgs and one hand dug test pit to the depth of 0.4 mbgs. The subsoil

conditions at the boreholes locations indicate that beneath a layer of topsoil/sand fill, the site is

underlain by deposits of fine sand and silty fine sand which overlie deposits of silty clay and silty

clay till. In places, layers of silt were encountered. No bedrock was encountered during the

Phase Two ESA.



City of Mississauga 6.10.2.2 Hydrogeological Characteristics

The subject site is located in the larger hydrogeological region known as Southern Ontario

Lowlands. A watershed map provided by the Credit Valley Conservation Authority (CVC)

shows the subject site is situated in the Credit Valley Watershed. The grade at the subject site

and surrounding areas generally descends towards east/southeast direction. Groundwater is

expected to flow towards the east.

Three (3) monitoring wells were installed at the borehole locations during the field investigation

for this Phase Two ESA. The monitoring wells were installed within the glacial till deposit at the

depths 4.6 mbgs to 5.3 mbgs. Based on the groundwater records, the groundwater flow direction

is to the east. The shallow groundwater contours and interpreted groundwater flow direction are

shown on Drawing No. 5.

Based on the groundwater records of the investigation for the Phase Two ESA, the horizontal

hydraulic gradient for the investigated aquifer within the glacial till at the subject site is 0.01

m/m and 0.03 m/m (average 0.02 m/m).

6.10.2.3 Approximate Depth to Bedrock

Bedrock was not encountered at the subject site during the field investigation within the

maximum drilling depth of 6.1 mbgs. Based on the information from Ontario Geologic Survey’s

Bedrock Cross Section Viewer, 2010, the depth to bedrock in the general vicinity of the subject

site is approximately 10 mbgs.

6.10.2.4 Approximate Depth to Water Table

Based on the groundwater records for this investigation, depth to the water table at the subject

site ranges from 1.4 to 3.2 mbgs.



City of Mississauga 6.10.2.5 Section 41 or 43.1 of the Regulation

The subject site is not within/adjacent/part of an area of natural significance and the analytical

testing indicated the pH of the tested soil samples is between 5 and 9. Therefore, Section 41 of

the regulation (Site Condition Standards, Environmental Sensitive Areas) does not apply to the

subject site.

The property is not a shallow soil property, as the approximate depth to bedrock in the area of

the subject site is 10 mbgs based on the information obtained from the Ontario Geological

Survey’s Bedrock Cross Section Viewer, 2010. However, there is a watercourse located to the

immediate southwest. Therefore, Section 43.1 of the Regulation (Site Condition Standards,

Shallow Soil Property or Water Body) applies to the subject site.

6.10.2.6 Soils Placed On, In or Under the Phase Two Property

The findings of the Phase One ESA indicate fill material at the subject site based on the review

of the previous geotechnical investigation. The field investigation of the Phase Two ESA

indicate sand fill at the subject site. The encountered fill material was assessed during the Phase

Two ESA.

6.10.2.7 Proposed Building and Other Structures

A residential development is being proposed for the subject site. It is anticipated that the new

development will be provided with municipal services meeting urban standards. The location of

proposed building or any other structures was not known at the time of preparation of this report.



City of Mississauga 6.10.3 Contamination In or Under the Phase Two Property

Based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, contaminants of potential concern in the soil and

groundwater with respect to the identified Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APECs) at

the subject site were assessed during the Phase Two ESA.

Based on the information obtained from the Phase One ESA and Phase Two ESA, the Ministry

of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) Table 9, Generic Site Condition Standards

for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition for

Residential/Parkland/Institutional/Industrial/Commercial/Community property use and for coarse

textured soils as published in the “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under

Part XV.1 of the EPA (Table 9 Standards) has been selected for assessing the soil and

groundwater condition at the subject site.

6.10.3.1 Area Where Contaminants are Present

The field investigation of this Phase Two ESA consisted of three (3) boreholes (BH1001,

BH1002 and BH1003) with monitoring wells to depths of 4.6 mbgs and 5.3 mbgs, and one (1)

hand-dug test pit (TP1) to depth of 0.4 mbgs at the subject site. Soil and groundwater samples

were collected during the Phase Two ESA and submitted for chemical analysis of one or more of

the following parameters: petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs), volatile organics compounds

(VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), organochlorinated pesticides (OCPs), and

metals and inorganics parameters (M&I).

The site investigation of the Phase Two ESA identified impacted surface soil with metals and

inorganics exceeding Table 9 Standards, at BH 1001 location (southern section of the subject

site).



City of Mississauga The remaining analysed soil and groundwater samples of the site investigation indicate the tested

parameters meet the Table 9 Standards.

The figure showing the impacted soil locations are given on Drawing No. 6.

6.10.3.2 Contaminants Associated with Each Area

The contaminants, at concentrations above Table 9 Standards, found during the site investigation

for the Phase Two ESA consisted of metals and inorganics (Boron (Hot Water Soluble) and

Molybdenum).

6.10.3.3 Contaminant Medium

Contaminants, boron (hot water soluble) and molybdenum were identified in the soil at a depth

of 0.8 mbgs to 1.5 mbgs for the BH1001 location at concentrations above the Table 9 Standards.

6.10.3.4 Description and Assessment of the Area Where Contaminant Found

During the site investigation of the Phase Two ESA, soil samples retrieved from the boreholes

and test pit conducted at the subject site were analyzed for one or more parameters of petroleum

hydrocarbons (PHCs), volatile organics compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

(PAHs), organochlorinated pesticides (OCPs), metals and inorganics (M&I).

Based on the review of the analytical results of the site investigation, the soil at depth of 0.8 to

1.5 mbgs for BH1001 was found to contain contaminants of metals and inorganics (boron (hot

water soluble) and molybdenum) in excess of the Table 9 Standards. Details of the soil

exceedance are tabulated below:



City of Mississauga

Sample ID Exceeded Parameters Result (ug/g) Table 9

Standards (ug/g)

BH1001/2 Boron (Hot Water

Soluble) 1.55 1.5

BH1001/2 Molybdenum 4 2

The remaining analyzed soil samples of the site investigation for the tested parameters meet

Table 9 Standards. A soil remedial action was required in the vicinity of BH1001 in order to

bring the impacted areas, into compliance with the Table 9 Standards.

Subsequently, Soil Engineers Ltd. conducted a remediation program, commencing on September

9, 2013 and completed on August 4, 2015. The soil remediation consisted of excavating and

removing impacted soil from the vicinity of BH1001 located at the south section of subject site,

and disposing of it off-site. Minor seepage was observed during the excavation. The seepaged

groundwater was removed along with the excavated material. The confirmation sampling

program was conducted concurrently with the delineation program.

The confirmatory soil samples were collected from the walls and floors of the excavated area and

submitted to the laboratory for the analysis of metals and inorganics parameter. On February 17,

2016, an additional confirmatory soil sample was retrieved from the floor of the excavation area,

at the location of BH1001 to verify the environmental quality of the soil in this area. The UTM

coordination of BH1001 was record during the Phase Two ESA first stage investigation, which is

zone 17T, 611449 m East and 4819534 m North. The location of the additional confirmatory

floor soil sample was identified by GPS device, based on the recorded UTM coordinates of the

BH1001. The analytical results of the confirmation testing program from the final margins of the

completed remedial excavation meet the Table 9 Standards.

Approximately 1542 m3 of contaminated soil was removed from the subject site for off-site

disposal.



City of Mississauga The field investigation of this Phase Two ESA did not identify any impacted groundwater at the

subject site. Therefore, no consecutive quarterly groundwater was conducted.

6.10.3.5 Distribution of Contaminants

Contaminants, Boron (Hot Water Soluble) and Molybdenum, were identified in the surface soil

at depths of 0.8 mbgs to 1.5 mbgs at the BH 1001 location (southern section of the subject site)

at concentrations above the Table 9 Standards. Based on the delineation and confirmation soil

testing program, the impacted soil in the vicinity of BH 1001 at the southern section of the

subject site is approximately 16.3 m by 16.6 m in area, extending to a maximum depth of 5.7

mbgs.

The figures showing the estimated lateral and vertical boundary of impacted soil and the

confirmatory soil sample are given on Drawing Nos. 6 and 7.

6.10.3.6 Reasons for Discharge

The contaminants in soil were apparently caused by imported fill material at the subject site.

6.10.3.7 Migration of Contaminants

Based on the Phase One and Two ESA, contaminated fill was located at the southern section of

the subject site. An active stormwater pipeline connected to Turtle Creek is located at the south

section of the subject site. The approximate location of the contaminated fill and stormwater

pipeline are shown in Drawing No. 2.

Based on the findings from the Phase Two ESA, the contaminated area was located at the south

section at the BH1001 location. The area of contaminants at the south section of the subject site

was related to parameters of metals and inorganics and identified in the soil to a maximum depth

of 5.7 mbgs near the stormwater pipeline. The groundwater flow direction is generally east.



City of Mississauga Therefore, the stormwater pipeline may affect the migration of contaminants horizontally and/or

vertically.

6.10.3.8 Climatic or Meteorological Conditions Influencing Contaminant Distribution of

Migration

Based on the groundwater records for this investigation, depth to the water table at the subject

site ranges from 1.4 mbgs to 3.2 mbgs. The impact at the subject site was related to inorganic

parameters identified in the soil layer above and/or below the water table. Water table may be

fluctuated due to climatic or meteorological conditions. Therefore, the groundwater flow

direction and water table fluctuation may affect the transport pathway of the contaminants

horizontally and/or vertically.

6.10.3.9 Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings

No soil vapour intrusion is anticipated at the subject site, as the identified impacted soil was

related to metals and inorganics.

6.10.4 Potential Exposure Pathways and Receptors

The contaminants detected in soil at the subject site including metals and inorganics parameters.

The assumed source of these contaminants is the imported fill material at the subject site. The

contaminant is expected to have several release mechanisms via soil, groundwater and air

causing exposure to human and ecological receptors in the vicinity of the subject site. These

exposure pathways are discussed in details below, and schematically presented in Drawing

No. 8.



City of Mississauga 6.10.4.1 Release Mechanisms

Contaminants, boron (hot water soluble) and molybdenum, in excess of the Table 9 Standards,

were identified in soil layer at the subject site. The release of the identified contaminants was

likely related to contaminated fill material at the subject site.

6.10.4.2 Contaminant Transport Pathway

The impact at the BH 1001 location was identified in the surface/subsurface soil layer near the

surface to a maximum depth of 5.7 mbgs. During the investigation, a stormwater pipeline was

located at the southern section of the subject site. Therefore, it is likely that the contaminant

transport pathways were identified along the underground pipeline or the horizontal hydraulic

gradient (east).

6.10.4.3 Receptors

With respect to the identified impact, potential receptors located on, in or under the subject site

are workers on-site, site vegetation, burrowing animals and soil organisms.

The impacted surface soil has subsequently been remediated; no potential receptors are

anticipated at present.

6.10.4.4 Receptor Exposure Point

Prior to the removal of the impacted soil, the receptor exposure points for the contaminant found

at the subject site is soil based contamination.

The impacted soil has subsequently been remediated; no receptor exposure points are anticipated

at present.



City of Mississauga 6.10.4.5 Routes of Exposure

The routes of exposure for the identified soil impact at the subject site would be dermal contact,

ingestion and/or inhalation. As no significant ecological habitats were identified at the subject

site, the risk to ecological receptors is expected to be minimal. Workers may have come into

contact with soil during remediation excavation, but this is expected to be minimal as excavation

equipment was used to remove the impacted soil from the subject site. Therefore, the exposure

to impacted soil is expected to be minimal. Furthermore, the impacted soil was excavated and

removed from the subject site and no routes of exposure are anticipated at present.

28

40

58

58

30

LAKESHORE

PETRIE

JOHNSONS

PENGILLEY

MEADOW WOOD INGERSOLL

STONEHAVEN

DAVECATH

ZANTE

CLARKSON

ANDROS

STEVELES

BALTIMORETur

tle Cree

kTurtle Creek

CRISTIN

A

611200

611200

611400

611400

611600

611600

611800

611800

4819

400

4819

400

4819

600

4819

600

4819

800

4819

800

Title: Area of Natural Features and Water BodiesProject:

Date: October 23, 2015

Drawing No. 1

Scale:0 40 80 120 16020

Metres

³

Potentially Contaminating Activities (PCAs)

Approximate Boundary ofSubject Site

Major RoadLocal Road

Watercourse

Railway

28

30

40

Importation of Fill Materialof Unknown QualityPesticides Manufacturing, Processing,Bulk Storage and Applications

Gasoline and Associated ProductsStorage in Fixed Tanks

58 Waste Disposal and Waste Management

Source:Water Course, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2015 C Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2015

Source:Water Body, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2015 C Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2015


Proposed Residential Development1571, 1575 and 1601 Lakeshore Road WestCity of Mississauga

C:GI

S201

5/job

s/150

8-E0

67

Source: City of Mississauga Interactive Map, 2015 Air photo C City of Mississauga

Title

Project

Reference No.

Date

Scale

Drawing No.

1508-E067

Soil Engineers Ltd.

Proposed Residential

Development

1571, 1575 and 1601

Lakeshore Road West

City of Mississauga

BH 1001BH 1001

BH 1003BH 1003BH 1002BH 1002

TP1TP1

Source: eMaps - Mississauga Interactive Online Mapping Service

@ 2015 City of Mississauga

Approximate Boundary

of Subject Site

Refer to Drawing

2

Test Pits, Boreholes and

Monitoring Wells Location

Plan

Approximate Location of

Borehole with

Monitoring Well

APEC 3

APEC 1


Test Pits

Underground Pipeline

APEC 2

October 23, 2015

Title

Project

Reference No.

Date

Scale

Drawing No.

1508-E067

Soil Engineers Ltd.


Development

1571, 1575 and 1601

Lakeshore Road West

City of Mississauga

3

Geological Cross-Section

(Key Map)

A

A’

B

B’


Borehole with

Monitoring Well

Cross Section Direction

BH 1001BH 1001



Refer to Drawing

BH 1003BH 1003BH 1002BH 1002


of Subject Site

October 23, 2015

Southwest Northeast

Title

Project

Reference No.

Date

Scale

Drawing No.

1508-E067

Soil Engineers Ltd.


Development

1571, 1575 and 1601

Lakeshore Road West

City of Mississauga

611430.00611435.00

611440.00611445.00

611450.00

4819530.004819535.00

4819540.004819545.00

4819550.004819555.00

4819560.004819565.00

4819570.00

BH 1001/MW 1001BH 1001/MW 1001

(87.72 masl)(87.72 masl)

BH 1003/MW1003BH 1003/MW1003

(88.64 masl)(88.64 masl)

BH 1002/MW 1002BH 1002/MW 1002

(88.11 masl)(88.11 masl)

5

Shallow Groundwater Flow

Pattern Plan

Groundwater Flow

Direction

Groundwater Contour


Borehole with

Monitoring Well

87.95



Refer to Drawing

88.20

88.45


of Subject Site

October 23, 2015

Title

Project

Reference No.

Date

Scale

Drawing No.

1508-E067

Soil Engineers Ltd.


Development

1571, 1575 and 1601

Lakeshore Road West

City of Mississauga



See Drawing

6

Approximate Location

of Soil Confirmatory

Samples

Boundary of Remedial

Excavation


BH 1001

24Molybdenum

BH1001/2 (0.8 – 1.5 mbgs)

1.51.55Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

20.67Molybdenum

BH1001-WALL3 (1.0 – 1.3 mbgs)

1.50.46Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

20.52Molybdenum

BH1001-WALL2 (0.8 – 1.5 mbgs)

1.50.18Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

21.4Molybdenum

BH1001-WALL5 (1.5 – 1.9 mbgs)

NA (below 1.5

mbgs)-Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

23.6Molybdenum

BH1001-WALL6 (1.3 – 1.8 mbgs)

1.51.2Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

C

C’

Lateral Delineation Plan

(BH 1001)

BH 1001BH 1001

2<0.5Molybdenum

BH1001-FLOOR4 (5.3 – 5.7 mbgs)

NA (below 1.5

mbgs)-Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

2<0.5Molybdenum

BH1001-FLOOR2 (4.0 – 4.2 mbgs)

NA (below 1.5

mbgs)-Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

20.86Molybdenum

BH1001-WALL4 (1.3 – 1.6 mbgs)

1.50.81Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

25.9Molybdenum

BH1001-WALL1 (1.2 – 1.6 mbgs)

1.51.4Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

2<0.5Molybdenum

BH1001-FLOOR1 (4.0 – 4.2 mbgs)

NA (below 1.5

mbgs)-Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

D

D’

Cross Section Direction


of Subject Site

2<0. 5Molybdenum

BH1001-Floor Com (2 mbgs)

NA (below 1.5

mbgs)-Boron (HWE)

Table 9

StandardsResult

Chemical

Parameters

February 22, 2016

0.14

0.14 1.5

1

0.52

SOURCE POTENTIAL

CONTAMINANT

RELEASE MECHANISM

AND TRANSPORT

PATHWAYS

MEDIA

IMPACTED

RECEPTOR

EXPOSURE

POINTS

ROUTES OF

EXPOSURE

HUMAN &

ECOLOGICAL

RECEPTORS

Drawing No. 8 - Human and Ecological Receptor Conceptual Site Model

Importation of Fill

Material of

Unknown Quality

Metals and

Inorganics

Spills/leaks

Leaching

Adsorption to

particles

Dissolution

Precipitation

Groundwater

Surface and

subsurface soil

Water wells:

municipal and

domestic drinking

water

Private swimming

pools, lakes or rivers

Irrigation water

Excavation/digging,

gardening

Domestic water

uses: shower,

laundry

Inhalation: air,

dust, vapour gas

Ingestion:

water, crops

Dermal

contact:

soil, air,

water

Accidental

ingestion:

soil, water,

crops

Root adsorption

and deposition:

vegetation,

garden plants

Residents

Excavation

workers

Visitors,

recreational

visitors

Vegetation:

agricultural

crops

Aquatic

wildlife

Terrestrial

wildlife

Livestock

Vegetation:

weeds

Surface run-

off

Reference: Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual (2005 Update). Agency for Toxic Substances and

Disease Registry.<http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hac/PHAManual/toc.html>

The use of metal-

based pesticides

at the orchard

located at the

neighboring

properties

adjacent to the

Phase One

Property

with non-potable ground water, for residential property ... 221747.pdf · certification date...

Documents