william crosson, ashutosh limaye, charles laymon national space science and technology center...
TRANSCRIPT
William Crosson, Ashutosh Limaye, Charles Laymon
National Space Science and Technology CenterHuntsville, Alabama, USA
Soil Moisture Retrievals Using C- andSoil Moisture Retrievals Using C- andX-band Radiometer Observations in X-band Radiometer Observations in
SMEX02: Successes and ChallengesSMEX02: Successes and Challenges
Motivation and ObjectiveMotivation and ObjectiveMotivation: Data from NASA’s Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR) are being used to estimate near-surface soil moisture. Analysis of the retrieval algorithms is needed to better understand the sensitivity of retrieved soil moisture to model parameters.
Objective: To utilize C- and X-band horizontally polarized brightness temperature data collected from an aircraft platform during the SMEX02 field experiment to evaluate the feasibility and limitations of soil moisture retrieval under conditions of significant vegetation biomass.
Soil Moisture Experiments in 2002 (SMEX02)Soil Moisture Experiments in 2002 (SMEX02)Location: Near Ames, Iowa Time: 24 June – 13 July 2002
Regional Area: ~5000 km2
Walnut Creek Watershed Area: ~ 400 km2
• 31 ground sampling sites for measuring gravimetric soil moisture, surface and soil temperatures (daily, AM), and vegetation properties (~weekly)• Surface energy flux stations, lidar, and radiosonde measurements• Aircraft microwave remote sensing data
Iowa Walnut CreekWatershed
Soybeans (40% of area)Corn (50% of area)
Polarimetric Scanning Radiometer (PSR)Polarimetric Scanning Radiometer (PSR)
10 km
Platform: NASA P-3BAltitude: 7300 m regional, 1800 m Walnut Creek Watershed
Incidence angle: 55o
3 dB footprint resolution (watershed): 750 m (C), 500 m (X)C-band frequencies (GHz):5.82 - 6.15, 6.32 - 6.65, 6.75 - 7.10, 7.15 - 7.50X-band frequency (GHz): 10.60 – 10.80
Walnut Creek Watershed coverage
PSR TB measurements
Corn
Soybeans
Daily mean volumetric soil moisture based on field site gravimetric ‘scoop’ measurementswith 2*standard error bars
Vegetation water content based on in situ destructive sampling
Vegetation Water ContentBased on in situ Measurements
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
176 178 180 182 184 186 188 190 1922002 Day of Year
kg
/m2
Corn
Soybeans
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
175 177 179 181 183 185 187 189 191 1932002 Day of Year
VW
C
PSRdays
Daily Soil Moisture and Vegetation Water ContentDaily Soil Moisture and Vegetation Water Content
Soil Moisture Retrieval AlgorithmSoil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm
VolumetricSoil Moisture
VolumetricSoil Moisture
Smooth SurfaceReflectivity
Smooth SurfaceReflectivity
EffectiveDielectricConstant
EffectiveDielectricConstant
VegetationTransmissivity
VegetationTransmissivity
SurfaceTemperature
SurfaceTemperature
SoilProperties
SoilProperties
BrightnessTemperature
BrightnessTemperature
Land CoverType
Land CoverType
SoilTemperature
SoilTemperature
Rough BareSurface Reflectivity
Rough BareSurface Reflectivity
SurfaceRoughness
SurfaceRoughness
Vegetated?Vegetated?
Yes
Apparent ReflectivityApparent Reflectivity
Effective TemperatureEffective TemperatureNo
Veg WaterContent
Veg WaterContent
Parameterizations:
Dobson Mixing Model
Choudhury et al. (1979) surface roughness correction
Choudhury et al. (1982) effective temperature
Jackson and Schmugge (1991) vegetation correction
Fresnel Reflectance
Experiment DesignExperiment Design
• Retrieve soil moisture: Using input data characterizing mean conditions over the SMEX02 Walnut Creek Watershed on each of 7 days, apply the retrieval algorithm for various points across a 3-dimensional parameter space (surface roughness, vegetation B parameter and single scattering albedo)• Validate: Using observed soil moisture conditions for each day, determine the parameter combinations that yield soil moisture estimates within a defined error range about the observed mean
Inputs representing mean conditions for given day:• Brightness temperature – Mean of PSR C- or X-band ‘postings’ • Surface and soil temperatures – Mean of observed temperatures • Vegetation water content – Mean of values measured at field sites (corn and soybeans), interpolated between ~weekly measurements
Veg-B 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.500.070.090.110.130.150.170.190.210.230.25
Parameter Space ComparisonParameter Space ComparisonC-band, H-PolC-band, H-Pol
Single Scattering Albedo = 0.03Single Scattering Albedo = 0.03
Shaded regions indicate combinations of surface roughness and vegetation B parameter that produce soil moisture values within 2 standard errors of the observed mean for the given day. The observed mean is for the 0-1 cm layer, intended to represent the effective C-band emitting depth. There is no overlap in valid soil moisture retrievals for July 9 and July 11.
July 1/July 11 (Wet) Overlap
July 1 (Very Dry) July 1/July 9 (Moderately Wet) Overlap
Roughness (cm)
Veg-B 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.500.070.090.110.130.150.170.190.210.230.25
Parameter Space ComparisonParameter Space ComparisonX-band, H-PolX-band, H-Pol
Single Scattering Albedo = 0.03Single Scattering Albedo = 0.03
Shaded regions indicate combinations of surface roughness and vegetation B parameter that produce soil moisture values within 2 standard errors of the observed mean for the given day. The observed mean is for the 0-1 cm layer, intended to represent the effective X-band emitting depth.
July 1/July 11 (Wet) Overlap
July 1 (Very Dry)
July 1/July 9 (Moderately Wet) Overlap
Roughness (cm)
All Days Overlap
Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface RoughnessSensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface RoughnessC-band, H-polC-band, H-pol
SS Albedo = .03, Vegetation B = 0.16SS Albedo = .03, Vegetation B = 0.16
The range of roughness values for which retrieved soil moisture is within .04 of the observed values for each day is represented here by the horizontal bars.
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.50Roughness (cm)
VW
C
July 1July 11Observed Mean VWC +/- .04
Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface RoughnessSensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface RoughnessC-band, H-polC-band, H-pol
SS Albedo = .03, Vegetation B = 0.16SS Albedo = .03, Vegetation B = 0.16
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.50Roughness (cm)
VW
C
June 25 June 27July 1 July 8July 9 July 11July 12
Soil moisture retrievals for wet, moderate and dry days have distinctly different sensitivity to roughness.
Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface RoughnessSensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface RoughnessC-band, H-polC-band, H-pol
SS Albedo = .03, Various B Parameter ValuesSS Albedo = .03, Various B Parameter Values
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.50Roughness (cm)
VW
C
B = 0.07B = 0.10B = 0.13B = 0.16
Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface RoughnessSensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface RoughnessX-band, H-polX-band, H-pol
SS Albedo = .03, Vegetation B = 0.16SS Albedo = .03, Vegetation B = 0.16
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40Roughness (cm)
VW
C
June 27 July 1
July 9 July 11
Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to VegetationSensitivity of Retrieved VWC to VegetationC-band, H-polC-band, H-pol
SS Albedo = .03, Roughness = 0.05 cmSS Albedo = .03, Roughness = 0.05 cm
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.07 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.19 0.22 0.25Vegetation B Parameter
VW
C
July 1July 11Observed Mean VWC +/- .04
The horizontal bars indicate the range of Vegetation B parameter values for which the retrieved soil moisture is within .04 VWC of the observed value.
Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Single Scatter AlbedoSensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Single Scatter AlbedoC-band, H-polC-band, H-pol
Vegetation B = 0.16, Roughness = 0.05 cmVegetation B = 0.16, Roughness = 0.05 cm
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.00 0.03 0.06
Single Scatter Albedo
VW
C
June 25June 27July 1July 8July 9July 11July 12
Wet
Dry
Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface RoughnessSensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface RoughnessC-band, V-polC-band, V-pol
SS Albedo = .03, Vegetation B = 0.07SS Albedo = .03, Vegetation B = 0.07
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.50Roughness (cm)
VW
C
July 1July 11Observed Mean VWC +/- .04
Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to VegetationSensitivity of Retrieved VWC to VegetationC-band, V-polC-band, V-pol
SS Albedo = .03, Roughness = 0.05 cmSS Albedo = .03, Roughness = 0.05 cm
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.07 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.19 0.22Vegetation B Parameter
VW
C
July 1July 11Observed Mean VWC +/- .04
Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Single Scatter AlbedoSensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Single Scatter AlbedoC-band, V-polC-band, V-pol
Vegetation B = 0.07, Roughness = 0.05 cmVegetation B = 0.07, Roughness = 0.05 cm
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.00 0.03 0.06
Single Scattering Albedo
VW
C
June 25 June 27July 1 July 8July 9 July 11July 12
Soil Moisture Retrievals UsingSoil Moisture Retrievals UsingConstant ParametersConstant Parameters
C-band, H-polC-band, H-pol
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
176 178 182 189 190 192 1932002 Day of Year
VW
C
B = .16, SS Albedo = .03, Roughness = 0.05 cmB = .13, SS Albedo = .03, Roughness = 0.40 cmB = .13, SS Albedo = .06, Roughness = 0.50 cmObserved Mean VWC +/- .04
Soil Moisture Retrievals UsingSoil Moisture Retrievals UsingConstant ParametersConstant Parameters
C-band, V-polC-band, V-pol
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
176 178 182 189 190 192 1932002 Day of Year
VW
C
B = .07, SS Albedo = .03, Roughness = 0.05 cmB = .07, SS Albedo = .00, Roughness = 0.05 cmB = .10, SS Albedo = .00, Roughness = 0.10 cmObserved Mean VWC +/- .04
Soil Moisture Retrievals UsingSoil Moisture Retrievals UsingConstant ParametersConstant Parameters
X-band, H-polX-band, H-pol
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
178 182 190 1922002 Day of Year
VW
C
B = .16, SS Albedo = .03, Roughness = 0.10 cmB = .16, SS Albedo = .03, Roughness = 0.20 cmB = .10, SS Albedo = .06, Roughness = 0.40 cmObserved Mean VWC +/- .04
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Mean VWC
Ran
ge
of
B p
aram
eter
val
ues
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Mean VWC
Ran
ge
of
rou
gh
nes
s va
lues
(cm
)
July 1
July 9
July 8June 25
July 12
July 7
June 25
Acceptable Parameter Ranges asAcceptable Parameter Ranges asFunction of Soil MoistureFunction of Soil Moisture
C-band, H-polC-band, H-pol
Roughness = 0.05 cm
Vegetation B parameter = .16
Due to increasing sensitivity, valid parameter ranges tend to narrow with increasing VWC.
June 27
July 11
July 1July 9 July 12
July 11
June 27
July 8
Illustrations of the range of parameter values that produce retrievals within .04 of the observed VWC.
Single scattering albedo = .03.
Lower roughness values are indicated for wetter soils.
Acceptable Parameter Ranges asAcceptable Parameter Ranges asFunction of Soil MoistureFunction of Soil Moisture
X-band, H-polX-band, H-pol
Due to increasing sensitivity, valid parameter ranges tend to narrow with increasing VWC. 0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Mean VWC
Ran
ge
of
B p
aram
eter
val
ues
Roughness = 0.2 cmJuly 1
July 9 July 11June 27
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Mean VWC
Ran
ge
of
rou
gh
nes
s va
lues
(cm
)
July 1
July 9
Vegetation B parameter = .16
June 27
July 11
Illustrations of the range of parameter values that produce retrievals within .04 of the observed VWC.
Single scattering albedo = .03.
Lower roughness values are indicated for wetter soils.
ConclusionsConclusions
• Using a single-frequency, single-polarization soil moisture retrieval algorithm, there is no parameter vector (surface roughness, vegetation B parameter, single scattering albedo) that produces soil moisture values for aggregate corn and soybean fields that are within two standard errors of the observed values for each of the five days for which complete PALS L-band coverage is available.
• For three days that are relatively wet, excellent retrievals were obtained with a single parameter vector. For each of the two dry days, different sets of parameter vectors were required to produce acceptable results.
• The inability to obtain accurate soil moisture retrievals with a single parameter vector does not appear to be related to errors in brightness temperatures.
• Under wet conditions, retrieved soil moisture for corn is seen to be very sensitive to all three parameters. For dry conditions, sensitivity is lower, but not negligible.