waterloo metro quarter building 3&4
TRANSCRIPT
WATERLOO METRO QUARTERBUILDING 3&4
SSD-10437 - RESPONSES TO DPIE
PREPARED FOR WATERLOO DEVELOPER PTY LTD
DOCUMENT NO. WMQ-BLD34-BSA-AR-RPT-DA211
Revision A
Date of Issue 04.06.2021
Artist’s impression only
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 2 of 15
ITEM 1010. MakerspaceThe layout of the Makerspace is compromised by the addition of the B99 service vehicle space. City staff recommend that any additional space required for servicing to be reallocated from the gym area.
RESPONSESpace on the ground floor is constrained due to the servicing and back house requirements for four building occupants (Student Accommodation, Social Housing, Makerspace, Gym). The B99 space has been co-located with the loading dock to consolidate similar uses and to limit the quantity of vehicular entries on the facade.
Active frontages have been maximised where possible. The gym area on ground floor is relatively modest in space serving as the gym lobby, reception and vertical circulation space. Re-allocating area from the gym for the B99 space would reduce the active street frontages.
The Makerspace plan diagram (right)demonstrates a potential layout that prioritises the active functions along the frontages to Botany Road and Church Yard. We anticipate the Makerspace area behind the B99 parking space will be used for ancillary functions such as toilets and storage.
H FHDG
FCC
UP
C
E
C.B.
C.B
.
1
DA150
BIC
YC
LE L
AN
E
Void Above
Entry
Void Above
1
DA151
Loading Dock
Waste Loading
Bike Store A
Student Accomodation Lobby
DA141
1
DA140
1
DA143
1
RL. 16.550
RL. 16.380RL. 16.380
RL. 16.380
Building 4 Waste Loading
Social Housing Lobby
Commercial Waste Loading
Outline of Awnings Above
Stair from mezzanine
Turntable9.25m Refuse
Gas Meter
Fire
Boo
ster
Stair from mezzanine
RL. 16.380
RL. 16.380
DA142
1
In ground grease arrestor
In ground grease arrestor
+ R
L 15
.340
1 : 16 Ramp
6 Bike Spaces
Outline of Awnings Above
Platform Lift
FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN REFER TO LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTS DRAWINGS
3.5M
PR
IMA
RY
SE
TBA
CK
BO
UN
DA
RY
WE
LLIN
GTO
N S
TRE
ET
BOTANY ROAD
CHURCH YARD
RL. 15.333
RL. 15.590
RL. 15.620
FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN REFER TO LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTS DRAWINGS
Student Accommodation
Switchroom
L01 building outline over
APPROVED BUILDING 3 PODIUM ENVELOPE SSD 9393
METRO SERVICE BOX
WATERLOO CONGREGATIONAL
CHURCH
HYDRANT BOOSTER ASSEMBLY
RL. 16.380
Outline of Awning Above
+ R
L 16
.380
1 : 16 Ramp
Fire Control Room
Substation
Substation
B4 B. Waste
Community Space
Student Bulky Waste15sqm
9m2
NBN
Comm. Bulky Waste8m2
16 Bikes
Gym Lobby
Community WC's
1:20.05
No ma
Contrawork o
Do no
Status
Sheet
Sheet
Projec
Check
Projec
Consu
Client
Notes
# S
Date generated
Key P
WATE
Pha
BIM 360://Sydney Metro - Waterloo Station/WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-MDL-0101-RVT-R20.rvt12/02/2021 9:54:40 AM
WM
JC
GenGro
WM
RTS
• All• Re• Stuchan• Allthe L• Alllevel• Fir• NB• Re• Re• Re• AdAcco• Re• In • Refront• So• Reacco• Re
CDEFG
H
IJKL
B99 SPACE
Indicative Potential Layout for a Makerspace(as presented at DRP Presentation 12 - 28.01.2021)
Proposed Ground Floor Plan
SP SP HDG
FH
FH
FCC
FCC
1
WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA150
BIC
YC
LELA
NE
Void Above
Mai
l box
es
Entry
VoidAbove
+ RL 15.040 (tbc)+ RL 15.210 (tbc)
+ RL 15.200 (tbc)
1
WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA151
198.3m²Loading Dock
80.5m²Waste Loading
23.1m²Substation
21.2m²Substation
35.6m²Bike Store A
31.4m²Switch Room
82.8m²Student Accomodation Lobby
66.6m²Gym Lobby
300.1m²Community Space
WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA141
1
WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA140
1
WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA143
1
RL. 16.550
RL. 16.380RL. 16.380
RL. 16.380
80.9m²Building 4 Waste Loading
72.6m²Social Housing Lobby
23.6m²Commercial Waste Loading
14.9m²Fire Control Room
Outline ofAwningsAbove
Stair from mezzanine
Turntable9.25m Refuse
Bulky Waste15m²
15.44
15.39
7.4m²NBN/PDH
11.4m²Gas Meter
Fire
Boo
ster
Stair from mezzanine
In ground diesel bulk tank 27sqm
RL. 16.380
RL. 16.380
RL. 16.380
WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA142
1
In groundwater tankpump
In ground grease arrestor
In ground grease arrestor
15 bike spaces(15 horizontal)
+ R
L 1
5.66
(tb
c)
+ R
L 1
5.9
30 (t
bc)
+ R
L 1
6.55
0 (t
bc)
1 : 12 Ramp 1 : 20 Ramp
Community Space WC
6 Bike Spaces
Outline ofAwnings Above
PlatformLift
FOR PUBLICDOMAIN REFERTO LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTSDRAWINGS
3.5M
PR
IMA
RY
SE
TBA
CK
BO
UN
DA
RY
WE
LLIN
GTO
NS
TRE
ET
BOTANY ROAD
CHURCHYARD
RL. 15.600
+ R
L 1
6.55
0 (t
bc)
+ R
L 1
6.38
0 (t
bc)
1 : 20 Ramp
Bulky Waste8m²
8m²Bulky Waste
In ground water tank
RL. 15.610
RL. 15.670
FOR PUBLIC DOMAINREFER TO LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTS DRAWINGS
StudentAccommodation
13.0m²Comms
StudentAccommodation
StudentAccommodation
SocialHousing
Bike Store C3 horizontal
bikes spaces
L01 buildingoutline over
APPROVED BUILDING 3 PODIUM ENVELOPE SSD 9393
METRO SERVICE BOX
WATERLOOCONGREGATIONAL
CHURCH
HYDRANTBOOSTER
ASSEMBLY
RL. 16.380
Outline ofAwning Above
No material may be reproduced without prior permission
Contractor must verify all dimensions on site before commencingwork or preparing shop drawings.
Do not scale drawings.
Revision
Status
Sheet number
Sheet title
Scale
Project number
Checked Approved
25mm
Sheet sizeA1
Project
Size check
Consultant
Client
Notes
# Description DateStatusRecent revision history
Date generated
Key Plan
SP
WATERLOO METRO QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
North Point
PRELIMINARYI
1 : 100
BIM 360://Sydney Metro - Waterloo Station/WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-MDL-0101-RVT-R20.rvt26/08/2020 6:09:54 PM
S12398
JC JC
General Arrangement PlanGround Floor Plan
WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA100
MT
A COST PLAN B 30.03.20B ISSUE FOR INFORMATION 17.04.20C ISSUE FOR INFORMATION 24.04.20D ISSUE FOR INFORMATION 15.05.20E ISSUE FOR INFORMATION 01.06.20F DRAFT SSDA ISSUE 15.06.20G SSDA ISSUE - FOR
LANDOWNER'S CONSENT27.07.20
H SSDA ISSUE - FORLANDOWNER'S CONSENT
30.07.20
I SSDA ISSUE 26.08.20
Workshop / Showroom
30sqm
Entry & Common
Room100sqm
Main Entry
Active Frontages to C
hurch Yard
Active Frontages to Botany Road
Loading Dock Access
Workshop15sqm
Workshop15sqm
Wor
ksho
p10
sqm
Wor
ksho
p10
sqm
Workshop / Showroom
25sqm
Workshop35sqm
Amenities / Storage30sqm
B99 Space
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 3 of 15
ITEM 1515. Blank Side WallsThe additional glazing is acceptable, however, there is no variation in the colour of the grid and infill panels of the north or east walls. This monotony could be better treated with some variety in colour. A condition to this effect is recommended.(City of Sydney)
Key Plan
Botany Road
Wel
lingt
on S
tree
t
Chu
rch
Yard
Northern Building End / The built from is articulated into 2 volumes with the corridor expressed as a glass slot/ The light-coloured grid frame creates a legible 2 storey scale. The expressed grid frame gives the elevation depth, and creates shadows on the solid aluminium cladding/ Windows to corner studios further reduces the extent of solid cladding/ Signage is proposed to top of building
Eastern Building End/ The built from is articulated into 2 volumes with the corridor expressed as a glass slot/ The two volumes are stepped in plan and height to emphasise this articulation/ The light-coloured grid frame creates a legible 2-3 storey scale. The expressed grid frame gives the elevation depth, and creates shadows on the solid aluminium cladding/ Window to the NE twin room breaks up the solid cladding/ Signage is proposed to top of building
Artist’s impression onlyArtist’s impression only
Proposed top of building sIgnage
Proposed top of building sIgnage
RESPONSEThe design of the building ends have been developed in response to feedback from the DRP to ensure the facade design to these elevations are highly considered.
We believe the proposed design has a considered balance between built form articulation, fenestration and architectural expression through the expressed grid frame.
We have avoided pattern making through a variety of panel colours, instead favouring a more simple, elegant approach in keeping with the overall building architecture.
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 4 of 15
SP SP H
H
H
H
M
FH KE FH
E
CDG
M
M
H
M
H
H
H
HH
1
DA150
1
DA151
DA141
1
DA140
1
DA143
1
MaintenanceAccess Door
Communal
DA142
1
23.04Studio
23.03Studio
23.02Studio
23.01Studio
23.05Twin
23.07Studio
23.08Twin
23.06Studio
Max. 1500mmH (RL. 88.900) to prevent additional overshadowing
Max. 1000mmH (RL. 88.400) to prevent additional overshadowing
Max. 500mmH (RL. 87.900) to prevent additional overshadowing
RL. 87.350
3.5M
PR
IMA
RY
SE
TBA
CK
BO
UN
DA
RY
2.5M
SE
CO
ND
AR
YS
ETB
AC
K
WATERLOOCONGREGATIONAL
CHURCH
WE
LLIN
GTO
NS
TRE
ET
BOTANY ROAD
CHURCHYARD
Photovoltaic Panel Zone
RL. 87.350
RL. 87.350
GC
Cup'd
APPROVED BUILDING 3 PODIUM ENVELOPE SSD 9393
APPROVED BUILDING 3 TOWER ENVELOPE SSD 9393
Guardrail
Inve
rter
s
Ladder
Comms
No material may be reproduced without prior permission
Contractor must verify all dimensions on site before commencingwork or preparing shop drawings.
Do not scale drawings.
Revision
Status
Sheet number
Sheet title
Scale
Project number
Checked Approved
25mm
Sheet sizeA1
Project
Size check
Consultant
Client
Date generated
Key Plan
SP
WATERLOO METRO QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
North Point
AFT D&C Builder
L
1 : 100
BIM 360://Sydney Metro - Waterloo Station/WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-MDL-0101-RVT-R20.rvt26/03/2021 10:25:29 AM
WMQ-BLD3-BSA
JC JC
General Arrangement PlanLevel 23 Plan
WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA123
MT
RTS Changes
• Comms Room Relocation from Roof toLevel 23• Change to Sun Shades on NorthernFacade• Addition of Guard Rail
ITEM 1616. ParapetThe height of the parapet on Building 3 identified in the image below should be extended from RL 87.35 to RL 88.9 to conceal views of the solar panels from the surrounding area whilst allowing for unobstructed solar access. All other parapets should be raised to a minimum 1.5 metres above the corresponding finished roof level, subject to mitigating any overshadowing impacts on Alexandria Park.(City of Sydney)
RESPONSEThe height of the current Building 3 parapet is designed to minimise overshadowing of Alexandria Park. Any additional height along the building edge above that shown in the SSDA drawings will increase overshadowing to Alexandria Park.
To mitigate visibility from the surrounding area, the solar panel zone is proposed to be adjusted by reducing the overall maximum height from 1.5m to 1m, and increasing the setback to the north, south and east. The diagram on the right illustrates the revised extents.
Given the revised setback and height of the panel zone, the proposed panels are not expected to be highly visible from the surrounding streets. Refer to the images on the following slides for view impact studies from the surrounding area.
Revised maximum 500mm H solar panel zone
Outline of solar panel zone on SSDA drawings
Revised maximum 1000mm H solar panel zone
1m high solar panel zone setback increased by 1m to the south
1m high solar panel zone setback increased by 0.7m to
the north
1m high solar panel zone setback increased by 0.7m
to the east
Solar panel zone maximum height reduced to 1m high
0.7m
1m
0.7m
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 5 of 15
ITEM 1616. ParapetThe height of the parapet on Building 3 identified in the image below should be extended from RL 87.35 to RL 88.9 to conceal views of the solar panels from the surrounding area whilst allowing for unobstructed solar access. All other parapets should be raised to a minimum 1.5 metres above the corresponding finished roof level, subject to mitigating any overshadowing impacts on Alexandria Park.(City of Sydney)
SSDA Solar Panel Zone
PROPOSEDSolar Panel Zone
VIEW IMPACT STUDIESView from Botany Road looking South
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 6 of 15
ITEM 1616. ParapetThe height of the parapet on Building 3 identified in the image below should be extended from RL 87.35 to RL 88.9 to conceal views of the solar panels from the surrounding area whilst allowing for unobstructed solar access. All other parapets should be raised to a minimum 1.5 metres above the corresponding finished roof level, subject to mitigating any overshadowing impacts on Alexandria Park.(City of Sydney)
VIEW IMPACT STUDIESView from Botany Road looking North
SSDA Solar Panel Zone
PROPOSEDSolar Panel Zone
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 7 of 15
ITEM 1616. ParapetThe height of the parapet on Building 3 identified in the image below should be extended from RL 87.35 to RL 88.9 to conceal views of the solar panels from the surrounding area whilst allowing for unobstructed solar access. All other parapets should be raised to a minimum 1.5 metres above the corresponding finished roof level, subject to mitigating any overshadowing impacts on Alexandria Park.(City of Sydney)
VIEW IMPACT STUDIESView from Wellington Street looking West
SSDA Solar Panel Zone
PROPOSEDSolar Panel Zone
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 8 of 15
Proposed Roof PlanProposed Roof Plan (3D)
M
H
H
H
M
M
H
H
4.1 4.3 4.4 4.54.2
A09.004
1
4.6
A09.001
1
A09.002
1
Lift OverrunBuilding 3 Tower (Student Accomabove lift overun
SYDNEY METRO ABOVE GROUND WORKS BOUNDARY
RL. 64.060
WATERLOOCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
COPE STREET
METRO SERVICE BOX BELOW
1900
1900
8075 8400 8400 2500 7550
6195
2955
7950
RL. 64.060
Skylight
2925 9350
3410
Roof Terrace Below
RESPONSE
The Building 4 roof is proposed to have a gravel finish to maintain reasonable visual amenity. A revised setback parapet detail around the building edge to allow for a sufficient gravel depth has been presented to the DRP. Increasing the parapet to 1m high would impact the proposed building form and architectural design whilst increasing overshadowing.
A louvred enclosure over the fire stair houses the stair pressurisation plant equipmentand all other plant equipment is housed in the Level 09 plant room. This plant space has been partially sunken below the roof slab to minimise it’s visual impact.
The proposal and images on this slide were presented at DRP Presentation 13 (19th March 2021) and were accepted by the panel.
ITEM 1717. ParapetThe height of the parapet on Building 4 should be similarly increased by a minimum of 1 metre to obscure any services, exhausts, plant and the like, subject to mitigating any overshadowing impacts. This would result in an exceedance to the stage 1 building envelope but comply with the maximum RL96.9 permitted for the site. (City of Sydney)
Date generated BIM 360://Sydney Metro - Waterloo Station/WMQ-BLD4-BSA-AR-MDL-0101-RVT-R20.rvt12/03/2021 4:15:43 PM
1 : 20
DRP - roof plant addition section1
Indicative section through louvred enclosure plant space
0.96m
Envelope Height RL 64.06m
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 9 of 15
ITEM 1818. MaterialsAny condition of consent regarding materials selection must require specifics including colour, material and where relevant manufacturer. Words such as “or similar” should not be permitted on the drawings. No substitutes should be permitted without the approval of an independent Design Review Panel. (City of Sydney)
RESPONSEThe proposed materials and finishes have been presented at DRP Presentation 12, with the increased level of detail being supported by the panel. The materiality for the Building 3 podium is shown here.
Artist’s impression only
BUILDING 3 MATERIALS BOARD
PODIUM
Building 3 Podium Finishes1/ Brickwork - General podium Dry Pressed Bricks
Colour - Brown/Red
2/ Brick - Soldier Course As above
3/ Brick - Stacked Bond Infill As above
4/ Clear vision glass
Window frames
Double glazed unit with clear performance vision glass with neutral body tint
Aluminium window systemPowdercoat finish “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”
5/ Metal Detailing Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”
6/ Louvres and metalwork to back of house areas
Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”
2 3 4 5 6
9
130 Botany Lane116 Wellington St291 George Street
Materiality of buildings within the immediate vicinity of the southern precinct:
Example: House Lincoln, Those Architects
The bricks for the podium are intended to relate to the materiality of the local context, without trying to mimic it. Dry pressed bricks are proposed for their textural quality and the range of tones that are produced from a single brick type.
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 10 of 15
BUILDING 3 MATERIALS BOARD
TOWER
Building 3 Tower Finishes1/ Horizontal Sunshades to western
volumeSolid AluminiumPowdercoat “matt” finishColour - “Warm Grey”
2/ Cladding to East & West Studios Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Light Bronze”
3/ Perforated Aluminium Sunshades to East & West Studios
Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Light Bronze”
4/ Clear vision glass
Glass spandrels
Window frames
Flush glazed DGU with clear performance vision glass with neutral body tint
Flush glazed DGU with colorback
Aluminium curtain wall systemPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”
5/ Aluminium Spandrel Cladding Panel to North & South Studios
Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”
6/ Cladding / Sunshades to North & South Studios
Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Medium Bronze”
2 3 4 65
ITEM 1818. MaterialsAny condition of consent regarding materials selection must require specifics including colour, material and where relevant manufacturer. Words such as “or similar” should not be permitted on the drawings. No substitutes should be permitted without the approval of an independent Design Review Panel. (City of Sydney)
RESPONSEThe proposed materials and finishes have been presented at DRP Presentation 12, with the increased level of detail being supported by the panel. The materiality for the Building 3 tower is shown here.
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 11 of 15
1
10 112 6
8
4
5
3
10
9
Building 4 Finishes1/ Exposed slab edges Off form concrete
2/ Brickwork - General Dry Pressed BricksColour - Light Cream/Beige
3/ Vertical shading battens Solid AluminiumPowdercoat finish “metallic” finishColour - “Natural Bronze”
4/ Balcony balustrades 40-50% Perforated Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”
5/ Clear vision glass
Window frames
Double glazed unit with clear performance vision glass with neutral body tint
Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”
6/ Acoustic Ventilator Panel Perforated Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Natural Bronze”
7/ Spandrels to Windows Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”
8/ Profiled cladding to Level 9 Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”
9/ Mesh screen to roof terrace “Marine grade” stainless steel woven wire mesh
10/ Vertical sun blades to Apartment type 2D
Solid AluminiumPowdercoat finish “metallic” finishColour - “Natural Bronze”
11/ Brickwork - Level 01 Dry Pressed BricksColour - Dark Grey
BUILDING 4 MATERIALS BOARD
7
ITEM 1818. MaterialsAny condition of consent regarding materials selection must require specifics including colour, material and where relevant manufacturer. Words such as “or similar” should not be permitted on the drawings. No substitutes should be permitted without the approval of an independent Design Review Panel. (City of Sydney)
RESPONSEThe proposed materials and finishes have been presented at DRP Presentation 12, with the increased level of detail being supported by the panel. The materiality for Building 4 is shown here.
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 12 of 15
ITEM 1919. MaterialsThe glazing selection does not appear to be clear and untinted. High performance and heavily tinted glazing is not good urban design and should not be supported(City of Sydney)
RESPONSEIn co-ordination with the facade consultant and ESD consultant, we are currently exploring a range of glass products to meet the desired building aesthetic and the required environmental performance.
Our preference is for high VLT, low reflectivity and a neutral body tint, however these preferences will need to be balanced with the required environmental performance and cost.
Whilst the final glass selection has yet to be determined, the photos and descriptions on this page demonstrate the design intent.
Building 3The glass samples above, that are currently being considered for Building 3, represent a range of tints, VLT’s and reflectivity criteria. The glass samples with X’s were rejected due to being ‘too dark’ and/or ‘too blue’.
Target specification based on glass samples:/ Clear performance vision glass with neutral body tint (not too blue or too green)/ Target range 52-66% VLT (higher VLT preferred)/ Target range 9-17% Reflectivity
Building 4The glass samples above, that are currently being considered for Building 4, represent a range of tints, VLT’s and reflectivity criteria. The glass sample with an X was rejected due to being ‘too dark’ and ‘too blue’.
Target specification based on glass samples:/ Clear performance vision glass with neutral body tint/ Target range 65-72% VLT (higher VLT preferred)/ Target range 13-18% Reflectivity
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 13 of 15
ITEM 2020. MaterialsAwning windows provide substandard amenity for occupants by minimising airflow. It is recommended that sashes or casement windows be provided instead. (City of Sydney)
RESPONSEAwning windows have been typically proposed as they enable occupants to open their windows and experience natural ventilation, whilst maintaining weather protection.
A casement or sash window window does not provide the same level of weather protection.
Sashes (double hung) windows are proposed to the windows on the western elevation of Building 4, where the windows are situated behind vertical louvres, and the operation of an awning window is not possible.
External Elevation
28 of 33SSD-10437 Design Report | Part Three: Building 4
ELEVATIONAL VIEW OF THE TYPICAL BEDROOM FACADE (WEST ELEVATION SHOWN)
Internal grille to acoustic ventilator
Ceiling fan to all bedrooms
Awning window
Insulated spandrel
Perforated aluminium panel to acoustic ventilator
Concrete slab edge provides horizontal sun shading to windows
Vertical aluminium sunblades provide shading & privacy to north facing balcony
Awning window
Insulated spandrel reduces heat gain & heat loss and provides additional privacy
Brick pier provides vertical sun shading to windows
Artist’s impression only
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 14 of 15
ITEM 2323. Solar Access and External Sun Shading (Building 3)Views from the sun diagrams should be provided at the summer solstice from 8am to 5pm to demonstrate the efficacy or otherwise of the design to mitigate the heat gain from the summer sun.(City of Sydney)
Design Responses to External Shading and Thermal Comfort/ The western elevation has a high degree of solidity - the extent of glass to the west elevation is approximately 32%- (i.e the elevation is 2/3 solid)/ An insulated colourback glass spandrel at lower level further reduces the area of vision glass/ The west facade has a considered response to shading with horizontal sunshades for the early afternoon sun and vertical shading for the middle/late afternoon sun. As shown in the plan below, the vertical shading panel extends in front of the window to further assist in shading / All studios will be fitted with an internal pull-down roller blind for students/ Performance double glazing to reduce heat transmission
Thick horizontal sunshade 400mm D x 400mm H aluminium
Colourback glass spandrel
Thin horizontal sunshade 400mm D x 20mm H aluminium
Aluminium frame awning window
Perforated aluminium vertical sunshade
Aluminium spandrel
Solid aluminium panel
3D facade section of the west facing facadePlan detail of west facing facade
SP SP H
H
F KE FH
H
CDG
HH
H
H
H
H H
H HHH
H
16.12Studio
16.11Studio
16.10Studio
16.09Studio
16.08Studio
16.07Studio
16.06Studio
16.05Studio
Communal
GC
Cup'd
RESPONSEThe design of the Building 3 tower facade has been developed through the DRP process to create a highly articulated facade that responds to different the solar conditions on each elevation.
Individually operable shading devices were considered to the western elevation, but were deemed not practically viable for student accommodation for ongoing maintenance and management reasons. Fixed shading was considered to be more appropriate and cost effective solution to shading the building.
SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 15 of 15
ITEM 2323. Solar Access and External Sun Shading (Building 3)Views from the sun diagrams should be provided at the summer solstice from 8am to 5pm to demonstrate the efficacy or otherwise of the design to mitigate the heat gain from the summer sun.(City of Sydney)
RESPONSEThe diagrams below were presented at DRP Presentation 12 on 28th January 2021. The diagrams demonstrate the degree of facade shading to the windows on the west elevation of Building 3.
The ‘Summernox’ (the average of summer solstice and equinox) was considered to be an appropriate method of demonstrating the average efficacy over the full period of summer.
Key Plan
Botany Road
Wel
lingt
on S
tree
t
Chu
rch
Yard
SHADING ANALYSIS February 4th ‘Summernox’(average of Summer Solstice and Equinox)
Extent of vision glass(32% of studio facade)
Line of floor levels1pm Full shade 2pm 80% shade 3pm 55% shade
4pm 40% shade 5pm 35% shade 6pm 25% shade Internal view of a typical studio
Insulated facade walls
Performance double glazed unit
Internal roller blind (Manually operated)
External vertical sunshade extending in front of the window
Artist’s impression only