waterloo metro quarter building 3&4

15
WATERLOO METRO QUARTER BUILDING 3&4 SSD-10437 - RESPONSES TO DPIE PREPARED FOR WATERLOO DEVELOPER PTY LTD DOCUMENT NO. WMQ-BLD34-BSA-AR-RPT-DA211 Revision A Date of Issue 04.06.2021 Artist’s impression only

Upload: others

Post on 29-Dec-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

WATERLOO METRO QUARTERBUILDING 3&4

SSD-10437 - RESPONSES TO DPIE

PREPARED FOR WATERLOO DEVELOPER PTY LTD

DOCUMENT NO. WMQ-BLD34-BSA-AR-RPT-DA211

Revision A

Date of Issue 04.06.2021

Artist’s impression only

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 2 of 15

ITEM 1010. MakerspaceThe layout of the Makerspace is compromised by the addition of the B99 service vehicle space. City staff recommend that any additional space required for servicing to be reallocated from the gym area.

RESPONSESpace on the ground floor is constrained due to the servicing and back house requirements for four building occupants (Student Accommodation, Social Housing, Makerspace, Gym). The B99 space has been co-located with the loading dock to consolidate similar uses and to limit the quantity of vehicular entries on the facade.

Active frontages have been maximised where possible. The gym area on ground floor is relatively modest in space serving as the gym lobby, reception and vertical circulation space. Re-allocating area from the gym for the B99 space would reduce the active street frontages.

The Makerspace plan diagram (right)demonstrates a potential layout that prioritises the active functions along the frontages to Botany Road and Church Yard. We anticipate the Makerspace area behind the B99 parking space will be used for ancillary functions such as toilets and storage.

H FHDG

FCC

UP

C

E

C.B.

C.B

.

1

DA150

BIC

YC

LE L

AN

E

Void Above

Entry

Void Above

1

DA151

Loading Dock

Waste Loading

Bike Store A

Student Accomodation Lobby

DA141

1

DA140

1

DA143

1

RL. 16.550

RL. 16.380RL. 16.380

RL. 16.380

Building 4 Waste Loading

Social Housing Lobby

Commercial Waste Loading

Outline of Awnings Above

Stair from mezzanine

Turntable9.25m Refuse

Gas Meter

Fire

Boo

ster

Stair from mezzanine

RL. 16.380

RL. 16.380

DA142

1

In ground grease arrestor

In ground grease arrestor

+ R

L 15

.340

1 : 16 Ramp

6 Bike Spaces

Outline of Awnings Above

Platform Lift

FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN REFER TO LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECTS DRAWINGS

3.5M

PR

IMA

RY

SE

TBA

CK

BO

UN

DA

RY

WE

LLIN

GTO

N S

TRE

ET

BOTANY ROAD

CHURCH YARD

RL. 15.333

RL. 15.590

RL. 15.620

FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN REFER TO LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECTS DRAWINGS

Student Accommodation

Switchroom

L01 building outline over

APPROVED BUILDING 3 PODIUM ENVELOPE SSD 9393

METRO SERVICE BOX

WATERLOO CONGREGATIONAL

CHURCH

HYDRANT BOOSTER ASSEMBLY

RL. 16.380

Outline of Awning Above

+ R

L 16

.380

1 : 16 Ramp

Fire Control Room

Substation

Substation

B4 B. Waste

Community Space

Student Bulky Waste15sqm

9m2

NBN

Comm. Bulky Waste8m2

16 Bikes

Gym Lobby

Community WC's

1:20.05

No ma

Contrawork o

Do no

Status

Sheet

Sheet

Projec

Check

Projec

Consu

Client

Notes

# S

Date generated

Key P

WATE

Pha

BIM 360://Sydney Metro - Waterloo Station/WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-MDL-0101-RVT-R20.rvt12/02/2021 9:54:40 AM

WM

JC

GenGro

WM

RTS

• All• Re• Stuchan• Allthe L• Alllevel• Fir• NB• Re• Re• Re• AdAcco• Re• In • Refront• So• Reacco• Re

CDEFG

H

IJKL

B99 SPACE

Indicative Potential Layout for a Makerspace(as presented at DRP Presentation 12 - 28.01.2021)

Proposed Ground Floor Plan

SP SP HDG

FH

FH

FCC

FCC

1

WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA150

BIC

YC

LELA

NE

Void Above

Mai

l box

es

Entry

VoidAbove

+ RL 15.040 (tbc)+ RL 15.210 (tbc)

+ RL 15.200 (tbc)

1

WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA151

198.3m²Loading Dock

80.5m²Waste Loading

23.1m²Substation

21.2m²Substation

35.6m²Bike Store A

31.4m²Switch Room

82.8m²Student Accomodation Lobby

66.6m²Gym Lobby

300.1m²Community Space

WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA141

1

WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA140

1

WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA143

1

RL. 16.550

RL. 16.380RL. 16.380

RL. 16.380

80.9m²Building 4 Waste Loading

72.6m²Social Housing Lobby

23.6m²Commercial Waste Loading

14.9m²Fire Control Room

Outline ofAwningsAbove

Stair from mezzanine

Turntable9.25m Refuse

Bulky Waste15m²

15.44

15.39

7.4m²NBN/PDH

11.4m²Gas Meter

Fire

Boo

ster

Stair from mezzanine

In ground diesel bulk tank 27sqm

RL. 16.380

RL. 16.380

RL. 16.380

WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA142

1

In groundwater tankpump

In ground grease arrestor

In ground grease arrestor

15 bike spaces(15 horizontal)

+ R

L 1

5.66

(tb

c)

+ R

L 1

5.9

30 (t

bc)

+ R

L 1

6.55

0 (t

bc)

1 : 12 Ramp 1 : 20 Ramp

Community Space WC

6 Bike Spaces

Outline ofAwnings Above

PlatformLift

FOR PUBLICDOMAIN REFERTO LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECTSDRAWINGS

3.5M

PR

IMA

RY

SE

TBA

CK

BO

UN

DA

RY

WE

LLIN

GTO

NS

TRE

ET

BOTANY ROAD

CHURCHYARD

RL. 15.600

+ R

L 1

6.55

0 (t

bc)

+ R

L 1

6.38

0 (t

bc)

1 : 20 Ramp

Bulky Waste8m²

8m²Bulky Waste

In ground water tank

RL. 15.610

RL. 15.670

FOR PUBLIC DOMAINREFER TO LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECTS DRAWINGS

StudentAccommodation

13.0m²Comms

StudentAccommodation

StudentAccommodation

SocialHousing

Bike Store C3 horizontal

bikes spaces

L01 buildingoutline over

APPROVED BUILDING 3 PODIUM ENVELOPE SSD 9393

METRO SERVICE BOX

WATERLOOCONGREGATIONAL

CHURCH

HYDRANTBOOSTER

ASSEMBLY

RL. 16.380

Outline ofAwning Above

No material may be reproduced without prior permission

Contractor must verify all dimensions on site before commencingwork or preparing shop drawings.

Do not scale drawings.

Revision

Status

Sheet number

Sheet title

Scale

Project number

Checked Approved

25mm

Sheet sizeA1

Project

Size check

Consultant

Client

Notes

# Description DateStatusRecent revision history

Date generated

Key Plan

SP

WATERLOO METRO QUARTER DEVELOPMENT

North Point

PRELIMINARYI

1 : 100

BIM 360://Sydney Metro - Waterloo Station/WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-MDL-0101-RVT-R20.rvt26/08/2020 6:09:54 PM

S12398

JC JC

General Arrangement PlanGround Floor Plan

WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA100

MT

A COST PLAN B 30.03.20B ISSUE FOR INFORMATION 17.04.20C ISSUE FOR INFORMATION 24.04.20D ISSUE FOR INFORMATION 15.05.20E ISSUE FOR INFORMATION 01.06.20F DRAFT SSDA ISSUE 15.06.20G SSDA ISSUE - FOR

LANDOWNER'S CONSENT27.07.20

H SSDA ISSUE - FORLANDOWNER'S CONSENT

30.07.20

I SSDA ISSUE 26.08.20

Workshop / Showroom

30sqm

Entry & Common

Room100sqm

Main Entry

Active Frontages to C

hurch Yard

Active Frontages to Botany Road

Loading Dock Access

Workshop15sqm

Workshop15sqm

Wor

ksho

p10

sqm

Wor

ksho

p10

sqm

Workshop / Showroom

25sqm

Workshop35sqm

Amenities / Storage30sqm

B99 Space

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 3 of 15

ITEM 1515. Blank Side WallsThe additional glazing is acceptable, however, there is no variation in the colour of the grid and infill panels of the north or east walls. This monotony could be better treated with some variety in colour. A condition to this effect is recommended.(City of Sydney)

Key Plan

Botany Road

Wel

lingt

on S

tree

t

Chu

rch

Yard

Northern Building End / The built from is articulated into 2 volumes with the corridor expressed as a glass slot/ The light-coloured grid frame creates a legible 2 storey scale. The expressed grid frame gives the elevation depth, and creates shadows on the solid aluminium cladding/ Windows to corner studios further reduces the extent of solid cladding/ Signage is proposed to top of building

Eastern Building End/ The built from is articulated into 2 volumes with the corridor expressed as a glass slot/ The two volumes are stepped in plan and height to emphasise this articulation/ The light-coloured grid frame creates a legible 2-3 storey scale. The expressed grid frame gives the elevation depth, and creates shadows on the solid aluminium cladding/ Window to the NE twin room breaks up the solid cladding/ Signage is proposed to top of building

Artist’s impression onlyArtist’s impression only

Proposed top of building sIgnage

Proposed top of building sIgnage

RESPONSEThe design of the building ends have been developed in response to feedback from the DRP to ensure the facade design to these elevations are highly considered.

We believe the proposed design has a considered balance between built form articulation, fenestration and architectural expression through the expressed grid frame.

We have avoided pattern making through a variety of panel colours, instead favouring a more simple, elegant approach in keeping with the overall building architecture.

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 4 of 15

SP SP H

H

H

H

M

FH KE FH

E

CDG

M

M

H

M

H

H

H

HH

1

DA150

1

DA151

DA141

1

DA140

1

DA143

1

MaintenanceAccess Door

Communal

DA142

1

23.04Studio

23.03Studio

23.02Studio

23.01Studio

23.05Twin

23.07Studio

23.08Twin

23.06Studio

Max. 1500mmH (RL. 88.900) to prevent additional overshadowing

Max. 1000mmH (RL. 88.400) to prevent additional overshadowing

Max. 500mmH (RL. 87.900) to prevent additional overshadowing

RL. 87.350

3.5M

PR

IMA

RY

SE

TBA

CK

BO

UN

DA

RY

2.5M

SE

CO

ND

AR

YS

ETB

AC

K

WATERLOOCONGREGATIONAL

CHURCH

WE

LLIN

GTO

NS

TRE

ET

BOTANY ROAD

CHURCHYARD

Photovoltaic Panel Zone

RL. 87.350

RL. 87.350

GC

Cup'd

APPROVED BUILDING 3 PODIUM ENVELOPE SSD 9393

APPROVED BUILDING 3 TOWER ENVELOPE SSD 9393

Guardrail

Inve

rter

s

Ladder

Comms

No material may be reproduced without prior permission

Contractor must verify all dimensions on site before commencingwork or preparing shop drawings.

Do not scale drawings.

Revision

Status

Sheet number

Sheet title

Scale

Project number

Checked Approved

25mm

Sheet sizeA1

Project

Size check

Consultant

Client

Date generated

Key Plan

SP

WATERLOO METRO QUARTER DEVELOPMENT

North Point

AFT D&C Builder

L

1 : 100

BIM 360://Sydney Metro - Waterloo Station/WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-MDL-0101-RVT-R20.rvt26/03/2021 10:25:29 AM

WMQ-BLD3-BSA

JC JC

General Arrangement PlanLevel 23 Plan

WMQ-BLD3-BSA-AR-DRG-DA123

MT

RTS Changes

• Comms Room Relocation from Roof toLevel 23• Change to Sun Shades on NorthernFacade• Addition of Guard Rail

ITEM 1616. ParapetThe height of the parapet on Building 3 identified in the image below should be extended from RL 87.35 to RL 88.9 to conceal views of the solar panels from the surrounding area whilst allowing for unobstructed solar access. All other parapets should be raised to a minimum 1.5 metres above the corresponding finished roof level, subject to mitigating any overshadowing impacts on Alexandria Park.(City of Sydney)

RESPONSEThe height of the current Building 3 parapet is designed to minimise overshadowing of Alexandria Park. Any additional height along the building edge above that shown in the SSDA drawings will increase overshadowing to Alexandria Park.

To mitigate visibility from the surrounding area, the solar panel zone is proposed to be adjusted by reducing the overall maximum height from 1.5m to 1m, and increasing the setback to the north, south and east. The diagram on the right illustrates the revised extents.

Given the revised setback and height of the panel zone, the proposed panels are not expected to be highly visible from the surrounding streets. Refer to the images on the following slides for view impact studies from the surrounding area.

Revised maximum 500mm H solar panel zone

Outline of solar panel zone on SSDA drawings

Revised maximum 1000mm H solar panel zone

1m high solar panel zone setback increased by 1m to the south

1m high solar panel zone setback increased by 0.7m to

the north

1m high solar panel zone setback increased by 0.7m

to the east

Solar panel zone maximum height reduced to 1m high

0.7m

1m

0.7m

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 5 of 15

ITEM 1616. ParapetThe height of the parapet on Building 3 identified in the image below should be extended from RL 87.35 to RL 88.9 to conceal views of the solar panels from the surrounding area whilst allowing for unobstructed solar access. All other parapets should be raised to a minimum 1.5 metres above the corresponding finished roof level, subject to mitigating any overshadowing impacts on Alexandria Park.(City of Sydney)

SSDA Solar Panel Zone

PROPOSEDSolar Panel Zone

VIEW IMPACT STUDIESView from Botany Road looking South

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 6 of 15

ITEM 1616. ParapetThe height of the parapet on Building 3 identified in the image below should be extended from RL 87.35 to RL 88.9 to conceal views of the solar panels from the surrounding area whilst allowing for unobstructed solar access. All other parapets should be raised to a minimum 1.5 metres above the corresponding finished roof level, subject to mitigating any overshadowing impacts on Alexandria Park.(City of Sydney)

VIEW IMPACT STUDIESView from Botany Road looking North

SSDA Solar Panel Zone

PROPOSEDSolar Panel Zone

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 7 of 15

ITEM 1616. ParapetThe height of the parapet on Building 3 identified in the image below should be extended from RL 87.35 to RL 88.9 to conceal views of the solar panels from the surrounding area whilst allowing for unobstructed solar access. All other parapets should be raised to a minimum 1.5 metres above the corresponding finished roof level, subject to mitigating any overshadowing impacts on Alexandria Park.(City of Sydney)

VIEW IMPACT STUDIESView from Wellington Street looking West

SSDA Solar Panel Zone

PROPOSEDSolar Panel Zone

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 8 of 15

Proposed Roof PlanProposed Roof Plan (3D)

M

H

H

H

M

M

H

H

4.1 4.3 4.4 4.54.2

A09.004

1

4.6

A09.001

1

A09.002

1

Lift OverrunBuilding 3 Tower (Student Accomabove lift overun

SYDNEY METRO ABOVE GROUND WORKS BOUNDARY

RL. 64.060

WATERLOOCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH

COPE STREET

METRO SERVICE BOX BELOW

1900

1900

8075 8400 8400 2500 7550

6195

2955

7950

RL. 64.060

Skylight

2925 9350

3410

Roof Terrace Below

RESPONSE

The Building 4 roof is proposed to have a gravel finish to maintain reasonable visual amenity. A revised setback parapet detail around the building edge to allow for a sufficient gravel depth has been presented to the DRP. Increasing the parapet to 1m high would impact the proposed building form and architectural design whilst increasing overshadowing.

A louvred enclosure over the fire stair houses the stair pressurisation plant equipmentand all other plant equipment is housed in the Level 09 plant room. This plant space has been partially sunken below the roof slab to minimise it’s visual impact.

The proposal and images on this slide were presented at DRP Presentation 13 (19th March 2021) and were accepted by the panel.

ITEM 1717. ParapetThe height of the parapet on Building 4 should be similarly increased by a minimum of 1 metre to obscure any services, exhausts, plant and the like, subject to mitigating any overshadowing impacts. This would result in an exceedance to the stage 1 building envelope but comply with the maximum RL96.9 permitted for the site. (City of Sydney)

Date generated BIM 360://Sydney Metro - Waterloo Station/WMQ-BLD4-BSA-AR-MDL-0101-RVT-R20.rvt12/03/2021 4:15:43 PM

1 : 20

DRP - roof plant addition section1

Indicative section through louvred enclosure plant space

0.96m

Envelope Height RL 64.06m

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 9 of 15

ITEM 1818. MaterialsAny condition of consent regarding materials selection must require specifics including colour, material and where relevant manufacturer. Words such as “or similar” should not be permitted on the drawings. No substitutes should be permitted without the approval of an independent Design Review Panel. (City of Sydney)

RESPONSEThe proposed materials and finishes have been presented at DRP Presentation 12, with the increased level of detail being supported by the panel. The materiality for the Building 3 podium is shown here.

Artist’s impression only

BUILDING 3 MATERIALS BOARD

PODIUM

Building 3 Podium Finishes1/ Brickwork - General podium Dry Pressed Bricks

Colour - Brown/Red

2/ Brick - Soldier Course As above

3/ Brick - Stacked Bond Infill As above

4/ Clear vision glass

Window frames

Double glazed unit with clear performance vision glass with neutral body tint

Aluminium window systemPowdercoat finish “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”

5/ Metal Detailing Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”

6/ Louvres and metalwork to back of house areas

Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”

2 3 4 5 6

9

130 Botany Lane116 Wellington St291 George Street

Materiality of buildings within the immediate vicinity of the southern precinct:

Example: House Lincoln, Those Architects

The bricks for the podium are intended to relate to the materiality of the local context, without trying to mimic it. Dry pressed bricks are proposed for their textural quality and the range of tones that are produced from a single brick type.

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 10 of 15

BUILDING 3 MATERIALS BOARD

TOWER

Building 3 Tower Finishes1/ Horizontal Sunshades to western

volumeSolid AluminiumPowdercoat “matt” finishColour - “Warm Grey”

2/ Cladding to East & West Studios Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Light Bronze”

3/ Perforated Aluminium Sunshades to East & West Studios

Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Light Bronze”

4/ Clear vision glass

Glass spandrels

Window frames

Flush glazed DGU with clear performance vision glass with neutral body tint

Flush glazed DGU with colorback

Aluminium curtain wall systemPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”

5/ Aluminium Spandrel Cladding Panel to North & South Studios

Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”

6/ Cladding / Sunshades to North & South Studios

Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Medium Bronze”

2 3 4 65

ITEM 1818. MaterialsAny condition of consent regarding materials selection must require specifics including colour, material and where relevant manufacturer. Words such as “or similar” should not be permitted on the drawings. No substitutes should be permitted without the approval of an independent Design Review Panel. (City of Sydney)

RESPONSEThe proposed materials and finishes have been presented at DRP Presentation 12, with the increased level of detail being supported by the panel. The materiality for the Building 3 tower is shown here.

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 11 of 15

1

10 112 6

8

4

5

3

10

9

Building 4 Finishes1/ Exposed slab edges Off form concrete

2/ Brickwork - General Dry Pressed BricksColour - Light Cream/Beige

3/ Vertical shading battens Solid AluminiumPowdercoat finish “metallic” finishColour - “Natural Bronze”

4/ Balcony balustrades 40-50% Perforated Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”

5/ Clear vision glass

Window frames

Double glazed unit with clear performance vision glass with neutral body tint

Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”

6/ Acoustic Ventilator Panel Perforated Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Natural Bronze”

7/ Spandrels to Windows Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”

8/ Profiled cladding to Level 9 Solid AluminiumPowdercoat “metallic” finishColour - “Dark Bronze”

9/ Mesh screen to roof terrace “Marine grade” stainless steel woven wire mesh

10/ Vertical sun blades to Apartment type 2D

Solid AluminiumPowdercoat finish “metallic” finishColour - “Natural Bronze”

11/ Brickwork - Level 01 Dry Pressed BricksColour - Dark Grey

BUILDING 4 MATERIALS BOARD

7

ITEM 1818. MaterialsAny condition of consent regarding materials selection must require specifics including colour, material and where relevant manufacturer. Words such as “or similar” should not be permitted on the drawings. No substitutes should be permitted without the approval of an independent Design Review Panel. (City of Sydney)

RESPONSEThe proposed materials and finishes have been presented at DRP Presentation 12, with the increased level of detail being supported by the panel. The materiality for Building 4 is shown here.

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 12 of 15

ITEM 1919. MaterialsThe glazing selection does not appear to be clear and untinted. High performance and heavily tinted glazing is not good urban design and should not be supported(City of Sydney)

RESPONSEIn co-ordination with the facade consultant and ESD consultant, we are currently exploring a range of glass products to meet the desired building aesthetic and the required environmental performance.

Our preference is for high VLT, low reflectivity and a neutral body tint, however these preferences will need to be balanced with the required environmental performance and cost.

Whilst the final glass selection has yet to be determined, the photos and descriptions on this page demonstrate the design intent.

Building 3The glass samples above, that are currently being considered for Building 3, represent a range of tints, VLT’s and reflectivity criteria. The glass samples with X’s were rejected due to being ‘too dark’ and/or ‘too blue’.

Target specification based on glass samples:/ Clear performance vision glass with neutral body tint (not too blue or too green)/ Target range 52-66% VLT (higher VLT preferred)/ Target range 9-17% Reflectivity

Building 4The glass samples above, that are currently being considered for Building 4, represent a range of tints, VLT’s and reflectivity criteria. The glass sample with an X was rejected due to being ‘too dark’ and ‘too blue’.

Target specification based on glass samples:/ Clear performance vision glass with neutral body tint/ Target range 65-72% VLT (higher VLT preferred)/ Target range 13-18% Reflectivity

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 13 of 15

ITEM 2020. MaterialsAwning windows provide substandard amenity for occupants by minimising airflow. It is recommended that sashes or casement windows be provided instead. (City of Sydney)

RESPONSEAwning windows have been typically proposed as they enable occupants to open their windows and experience natural ventilation, whilst maintaining weather protection.

A casement or sash window window does not provide the same level of weather protection.

Sashes (double hung) windows are proposed to the windows on the western elevation of Building 4, where the windows are situated behind vertical louvres, and the operation of an awning window is not possible.

External Elevation

28 of 33SSD-10437 Design Report | Part Three: Building 4

ELEVATIONAL VIEW OF THE TYPICAL BEDROOM FACADE (WEST ELEVATION SHOWN)

Internal grille to acoustic ventilator

Ceiling fan to all bedrooms

Awning window

Insulated spandrel

Perforated aluminium panel to acoustic ventilator

Concrete slab edge provides horizontal sun shading to windows

Vertical aluminium sunblades provide shading & privacy to north facing balcony

Awning window

Insulated spandrel reduces heat gain & heat loss and provides additional privacy

Brick pier provides vertical sun shading to windows

Artist’s impression only

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 14 of 15

ITEM 2323. Solar Access and External Sun Shading (Building 3)Views from the sun diagrams should be provided at the summer solstice from 8am to 5pm to demonstrate the efficacy or otherwise of the design to mitigate the heat gain from the summer sun.(City of Sydney)

Design Responses to External Shading and Thermal Comfort/ The western elevation has a high degree of solidity - the extent of glass to the west elevation is approximately 32%- (i.e the elevation is 2/3 solid)/ An insulated colourback glass spandrel at lower level further reduces the area of vision glass/ The west facade has a considered response to shading with horizontal sunshades for the early afternoon sun and vertical shading for the middle/late afternoon sun. As shown in the plan below, the vertical shading panel extends in front of the window to further assist in shading / All studios will be fitted with an internal pull-down roller blind for students/ Performance double glazing to reduce heat transmission

Thick horizontal sunshade 400mm D x 400mm H aluminium

Colourback glass spandrel

Thin horizontal sunshade 400mm D x 20mm H aluminium

Aluminium frame awning window

Perforated aluminium vertical sunshade

Aluminium spandrel

Solid aluminium panel

3D facade section of the west facing facadePlan detail of west facing facade

SP SP H

H

F KE FH

H

CDG

HH

H

H

H

H H

H HHH

H

16.12Studio

16.11Studio

16.10Studio

16.09Studio

16.08Studio

16.07Studio

16.06Studio

16.05Studio

Communal

GC

Cup'd

RESPONSEThe design of the Building 3 tower facade has been developed through the DRP process to create a highly articulated facade that responds to different the solar conditions on each elevation.

Individually operable shading devices were considered to the western elevation, but were deemed not practically viable for student accommodation for ongoing maintenance and management reasons. Fixed shading was considered to be more appropriate and cost effective solution to shading the building.

SSD-10437 | Response to Submissions 15 of 15

ITEM 2323. Solar Access and External Sun Shading (Building 3)Views from the sun diagrams should be provided at the summer solstice from 8am to 5pm to demonstrate the efficacy or otherwise of the design to mitigate the heat gain from the summer sun.(City of Sydney)

RESPONSEThe diagrams below were presented at DRP Presentation 12 on 28th January 2021. The diagrams demonstrate the degree of facade shading to the windows on the west elevation of Building 3.

The ‘Summernox’ (the average of summer solstice and equinox) was considered to be an appropriate method of demonstrating the average efficacy over the full period of summer.

Key Plan

Botany Road

Wel

lingt

on S

tree

t

Chu

rch

Yard

SHADING ANALYSIS February 4th ‘Summernox’(average of Summer Solstice and Equinox)

Extent of vision glass(32% of studio facade)

Line of floor levels1pm Full shade 2pm 80% shade 3pm 55% shade

4pm 40% shade 5pm 35% shade 6pm 25% shade Internal view of a typical studio

Insulated facade walls

Performance double glazed unit

Internal roller blind (Manually operated)

External vertical sunshade extending in front of the window

Artist’s impression only