water & sanitation in khyber …puf.urbanunit.gov.pk/presentations/marquee 1/day 2/03kp...water...

Pakistan Urban Forum ‐ Karachi January 10‐12, 2014

______________________________________________________________________________

WATER & SANITATION IN WATER & SANITATION IN KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA

ZubairZubair QureshiQureshi

Executive DirectorExecutive Director

Urban Policy Unit KPKUrban Policy Unit KPKUrban Policy Unit, KPKUrban Policy Unit, KPK


______________________________________________________________________________

• Background and Institutional frameworkB i f f b P h W S l S i i d SWM• Brief facts about Peshawar Water Supply , Sanitation and SWM

• Issues and need for Reforms • Water and Sanitation Company Peshawar • Agenda and Issues for the Company


______________________________________________________________________________

LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

•Up to 1959, District Boards, Municipal Committees and notified Area Committees.Committees. •Basic Democracies (BD) system in 1959. •In 1979 LG Ordinance I 2001 Th t f L l t d d l ti t l l l f•In 2001, The concept of Local government and devolution to lower level of management •Provincial Khyber Pakhtunkwha Local Government Act‐2012 LG Act 2013 with strengthened LGs


______________________________________________________________________________

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

TMAs working under PLGO 2001 (could have been integrated using sec 36). LG Act KPK 2012, which talk of Municipal Corporation in Peshawar City (Mayor)New LG Act 2013, with TMAsOther Departments like Cantonment Board working under CB Act 1924, PDA revived under a notification, PHED building infrastructure in rural areas only Local Area Development Authorities Galliyat, Peshawar Development Authority, Mardan, Swabi, Mansehra, Abbotabad, Kohat, Karak, Bannu, Dera Ismail Khan, Swat KaghanSwat, KaghanThe Only CDG in the country, without a WASA


______________________________________________________________________________

DISTRICT WISE WATER SUPPLY COVERAGE

DistrictPop: served (000) % age Coverage

Total Urban Rural Total Urban Rural

Abbottabad 734 178 556 72 39 90 00 68 05Abbottabad 734 178 556 72.39 90.00 68.05

Bannu 722 35 687 86.05 70.18 87.00D.I.Khan 856 142 713 78.03 97.95 74.97Kohat 555 95 460 76.76 48.61 87.20Mardan 1085 269 816 58.90 70.00 56.00Peshawar ‐ ‐ 1106 ‐ ‐ 79.66Swat 666 108 558 40.85 45.37 40.05


______________________________________________________________________________

WATER SUPPLY

• Over reliance on tubewells and wells

• Greater water supply Peshawar Feasibility study done. Surface water supply system from four possible locations in the vicinity of the city.

• Warsak Dam• Jabba Dam• Barra Dam• Munda Dam (pre-feasibility)Munda Dam (pre feasibility)


______________________________________________________________________________

SEWERAGE & DRAINAGE SYSTEM

• The sanitation & drainage system consists of mostly open/covered drains (in older parts of the city) and combination of collection sewers

d t k (i d l t )and trunk sewers (in new developments).• The system caters to both domestic sewage and sullage as well the

storm water.• Additionally, Irrigation Canals running in various parts of the city have

been turned into sewers, causing water quality issues.• All KPK Sewage is passed on to canals and rivers without treatment


______________________________________________________________________________

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

• There are three wastewater Treatment Plants in PeshawarCity (constructed in 1990’s). These plants were never put tooperation and have since been abandonedoperation and have since been abandoned.

• Primary, secondary and Tertiary Sewers and houseconnections were not completed.p

• Canals passing through Peshawar cannot continue to beused as Sewers.


______________________________________________________________________________

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

• Antiquated departmental arrangements for municipal services, withSWM accorded lowest priority.

• 800 Tons of solid waste is being generated in the city of Peshawar• Landfill site being identified, and new agreement in place by District

Government (with Waste Busters), though that is yet to take off.• WSSP may improve things


______________________________________________________________________________

No Measures Y1‐Y2 Y3‐Y5 Y6‐Y7 Total

1 S t i tit ti ’ t th i d it b ildi 96 144 48 288

COST OF PRIORITY MEASURES IN WATSAN (CDS)

1 Sector institutions’ strengthening and capacity building 96 144 48 288

2 Provincial Drinking Water Supply Strategy 10 0 0 10

3 Supply of water and sanitation to new areas 2,880 2,976 4,512 10,368pp y

4 Rehab of existing water supply schemes 960 1,920 2,880 5,760

5 Incentives program for Sanitation Strategy 96 288 288 672

6 Water saving measures 48 96 48 1926 Water saving measures

7 Drinking water supply regulation including ground water 48 96 48 192

8 Emergency Preparedness & Response 72 144 96 312

9 Greater water supply scheme for Peshawar 480 1,440 960 2,880

10 Abbottabad gravity water supply scheme 2,650 1,459 0 4,109

Total 7,339 8,563 8,880 24,782


______________________________________________________________________________

Peshawar Peshawar i i expansion over expansion over

the years the years


______________________________________________________________________________

PESHAWAR INSTITUTIONS IN WATSAN


______________________________________________________________________________

PESHAWAR URBAN POPULATION

4.19

3 50

4.00

4.50

1.53 1.58

2.13

2.99

1 50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

0.96

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

1998 2010 2011 2020 2030 20401998 2010 2011 2020 2030 2040Year


______________________________________________________________________________

KPK POLICY & VISION IN WSS

To expand the availability of clean water to all, especially in areas especially in areas threatened by conflict, and to ensure that people in Kpkhave access to safe fsanitation.


______________________________________________________________________________

INTRODUCTION TO PESHAWAR WATER SUPPLY

• Peshawar Population 1.60 million• Existing Water Supply System based on ground water, with 477

deep tube wellsdeep tube wells.• Nearly 65.0 MGD water is being supplied• Seven Agencies involved in providing water supply and sanitation

i i F (04) TMA (T 1 t 4) P h D l tservices i.e. Four (04) TMAs (Town 1 to 4), Peshawar DevelopmentAuthority (PDA), Cantonment Board (CB) and Public HealthEngineering Department (PHED)


______________________________________________________________________________WATER DEMAND ANALYSIS

# Y P l iAverage Daily Demand

(M d)Peak Daily

D d (M d)# Year Population (Mgd) Demand (Mgd)

1 1998 964,794 43.76 65.64

2 2010 1 534 731 69 444 104 1662 2010 1,534,731 69.444 104.166

3 2011 1,581,176 71.536 107.304

4 2020 2,134,900 96.487 144.73, ,

5 2030 2,987,770 134.903 202.354

6 2040 4,190,243 189.057 283.585

Peak Daily Demand = 1.5 times the average daily demand

45 gallons per capita per day


______________________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE AND PEAK WATER PRODUCTION RATES

/ f f b llAverage

i h f b Average Pumping Total Quantity of

#

Town / Areas No of UCs No. of Tube Wells Discharge of Tube Wells

Average Pumping Hrs Water

(MGD)

1 TMA Town 1 25 255 10700 13 35.47

2 Town ‐ 2 2 3 12000 10 0.36

3 Town ‐ 3 12 113 10000 10 11.33

4 Town ‐ 4 2 7 6500 6 0.273

5 PDA 2 66 21500 9 12.771

6 C.B 33 14000 10 4.62

Total 43 477 64.824

7 PHED 70 * 8500 12 7.140

G ‐ Total 547 71.964

* 70 No. Tube wells (49 for Town 1 and 21 for Town 3) are under execution by PHED


______________________________________________________________________________

URBAN INSTITUTIONAL REFORM PROGRAMS

Water and Sanitation Services Peshawar

M i i l S i PMunicipal Services Program98mUSD (PKR 8.5bn) (USAID: 84.7m$, GoKP: 12.7m$ ; PKR 1.1bn) in the

Municipal Areas of Peshawar, Malakand & DIK Divisions

The Urban Policy Unit


______________________________________________________________________________

APPROVAL BY CHIEF MINISTER KHYBER APPROVAL BY CHIEF MINISTER KHYBER PAKTUNKHWAPAKTUNKHWA TO TO WSSPPAKTUNKHWAPAKTUNKHWA TO TO WSSP

•Detailed report Feb 2012 and then in Jan 2014 focusing on;• institutional structure• institutional structure, •governance arrangements, •services delivery and technical aspects & human resource•asset acquisition arrangements, •financial forecasting for sustainability •legal and other requirements for incorporation of the company with g q p p ySecurities and Exchange Company of Pakistan (SECP)


______________________________________________________________________________

CRITICAL DIMENSIONS OF UTILITY

reporting & “listening” to customers. Treating them as “clients” not mere consumers

Customer orientation

being answerable to another party for policy decisions, Accountability

being independent to manage professionally

for the use of resources, and for performanceAccountability

Autonomybeing independent to manage professionally without arbitrary interference by others


______________________________________________________________________________

WATER CONNECTIONS

Towns Domestic Commercial Total

T 1 35 688 1 713 37 397Town-1 35,688 1,713 37,397Town-2 655 0 655Town-3 18,399 1,300 19,699Town 4 832 0 832Town-4 832 0 832Hayatabad 14,737 264 15,001Contonment 2,812 1,206 4,018

Total 73 123 4 483 77 602Total 73,123 4,483 77,602


______________________________________________________________________________

CONNECTION : CROSS CHECK

Electricity Connections : 3,64,000Land Parcels (GIS) : 3 50 000Land Parcels (GIS) : 3,50,000Housing Units : 3,54,000

Water connections cannot be 77,000,

but at least 2,50,000but at least 2,50,000


______________________________________________________________________________

Living in 2012 in Provincial HQLiving in 2012 in Provincial HQ


______________________________________________________________________________

Built & abandoned: A case for Institutional ReformsBuilt & abandoned: A case for Institutional Reforms


______________________________________________________________________________

A case for Professionally capacitated institutionsA case for Professionally capacitated institutions


______________________________________________________________________________

REVENUE & EXPENDITURE

•• Sustainable? (ESustainable? (Electricity not included )lectricity not included )

Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures for Four Years

400,000,000

500,000,000

600,000,000 Rupe

Years

‐

100,000,000

200,000,000

300,000,000

8 8

es Revenues

Expenditures

2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 2010‐11

Years


______________________________________________________________________________

REVENUE COLLECTED EXISTING DOCUMENTED CONNECTIONS

Town Connections Potential Collected %age

T-1 47,684 85m 34.6m 38

T-2 615 1.17m 0.91m 78

T-3 19,699 37.95m 37m 98

T-4T-4

PDA 27.8m 26m 94

CB

Total


______________________________________________________________________________

LIABILITIES

• Subsidies annual : Rs 1000 Million •Electricity Bill : 475m


______________________________________________________________________________

SOURCES OF REVENUE

•Tariff•WaterWater•Sewerage•Waste Collection•Recyclables etc

•UIPT Share•Subsidy by TMA / PDA / CBy y•Subsidy by GoKP•Efficiency Gains


______________________________________________________________________________

EMPLOYEES

BPS (Grades) Number

17- 15 1514-10 431 10 36651-10 3665

TOTAL 3723

Staff to be transferred to Company from Seven Organizations


______________________________________________________________________________

STRUCTURE TO MATCH THE VISION

•A legal framework comparable to that of non-government owned commercial companiesP i i f B d f Di t•Provision for Boards of Directors

•Clarity of corporate objectives•Transparency of obligations of each party•Transparency of obligations of each party•Requirement for commercial orientation•External accountability, andy,•Documented targets and performance expectations.


______________________________________________________________________________

REGULATOR

•There is a need for a province wide sector (WATSAN) regulator.

•Can be developed in the next phase, post July 2012


______________________________________________________________________________

ESSENTIAL INGREDIENTS FOR REFORMS

Ingredient Status Remarks

Political Will Yes CM commitment

Vision Excellent WSSP Committee

System Being designed

Infrastructure 50:50 Less than optimum UseInfrastructure 50:50 Less than optimum Use

Human Resource Mid career Managers Gap Workers enough

Best practice Models CB, PDA, TMAs Complaint center, PPP

Demand for Service Yes


______________________________________________________________________________

STAFFING IN WSSP HQ


______________________________________________________________________________

ZONAL OFFICE ZONAL OFFICE


______________________________________________________________________________

TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION WSSP


______________________________________________________________________________

FINANCIAL MODELS


______________________________________________________________________________

FINANCIAL MODELS

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22

(Subsidy Required)/Profit (925) (885) (1,046) (920) (698) (644) 45 621 755 964% to Total Expenditure -81% -62% -62% -47% -31% -25%

Paak Pekhawar: Financial ProjectionsConservative Scenario (Scenario I)

pTotal Revenue 213 534 651 1,039 1,540 1,917 2,976 3,976 4,555 5,270Total Operating Expenditure 1,138 1,419 1,697 1,959 2,238 2,561 2,931 3,355 3,800 4,306

R

Comparison of Revenue and Expenditures

500.001,000.001,500.002,000.002,500.003,000.003,500.00

upees

i

Expenditures

Total Revenues

T t l E dit0.00n

M

Years

Total Expenditure


______________________________________________________________________________

SUPPORT BY DONORS

Water and Sanitation Program (WSP), World BankWater and Sanitation Program (WSP), World Bankg ( )g ( )•In 2009, senior government officers visited Jo water (South Africa)•WSP provided technical assistance to committee

USAID USAID •Funded 9 experts to prepare blue print of company, and appointed coordinator & legal expert to incorporate the company with SECP. •The Municipal Services Program $84.75 million •Water and Sanitation master plan for Peshawar -NDCWater and Sanitation master plan for Peshawar NDC •The Engineering Designs by Halcrow

The Asian Development Bank (ADB)The Asian Development Bank (ADB)•ADB offered in WATSAN $65 million (70%), with $28 million government contribution (30%) PPTA k j(30%). PPTA to work out projects•They have offered $300,000 TA for establishment and operationalization of WSSP, in which Finance, HR, Legal and Institutional support will be provided.


______________________________________________________________________________

WAY FORWARD & POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION

•WSSP registered with SECP. AoA and MoA drafted for the Section 42 Company (non profit)•PC I for Rs 1137.392 million approved. Start up money to be given as Grant to the WSSP, and BOD be empowered to make decisions on utilization. •Interviews have to be arranged for the atleast twenty posts in Senior management •Assets transfer through Services and Asset Management Agreement and staff transfer ( b t 4000) ill b t i hi h PDA d M i i l C ti P h d l t(about 4000) will be next, in which PDA and Municipal Corporation Peshawar, and later District Council Peshawar) staff has to be transferred (77 UCs). •Peshawar MC extended boundary has to include 77 UCs. The new LG act should include the inclusion of peri urban areas in MC limits and should provide for MC andinclude the inclusion of peri urban areas in MC limits, and should provide for MC and other LG institutions to transfer services delivery to corporate entities, and establishment of a Regulator


______________________________________________________________________________

THANKS THANKS & &

GOD BLESSGOD BLESS

water & sanitation in khyber …puf.urbanunit.gov.pk/presentations/marquee 1/day 2/03kp...water...

Documents