us fda food safety modernization act-future impact on asia
DESCRIPTION
Presented at the Conference section of Food & Hotel Singapore, 9 April 2014TRANSCRIPT
The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration’s Food Safety
Modernization Act:
Future Impact on Asia
David Lennarz
Vice President, Registrar Corp
April 2014
1 14/04/2014
2
Current & Future Requirements
Background
Motivation and Concept
Proposed Rules
Effects on Foreign Manufacturers
Questions & Answers
3
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act: Facts
2011
1938
4
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act: Facts
5
U.S. Regulation Overview
6
Federal Register Citation
7
Code of Federal Regulations
The Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act is detailed
in what we call the Code
of Federal Regulations or
“CFR”
The CFR is a codification
of the general and
permanent rules published
in the “Federal Register”
8
Code of Federal Regulations
9
Motivators for FSMA: Facts
48,000,000 Americans get sick
128,000 are hospitalized
3,000 die
High Profile Cases
Imports in the spotlight over past decade:
11
United States Imports
12
Import Statistics
Medical Devices Drugs
Foods
13
Burden on Importers
and Foreign Manufacturers
FSMA makes importers more responsible for quality of
products from foreign manufacturers
14
Vision of FSMA: Prevention
15
Key Components
Prevention
Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food
• Proposed Rule Released January 4, 2013
• Comment period ended on November 22, 2013
Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption
• Proposed Rule Released January 4, 2013
• Comment period until November 22, 2013
Prevention
Mandatory Preventative
Controls for Food
• Two parts –
• New provisions requiring Hazard Analysis and Risk-based
Preventative Controls
• Revises existing CGMPs in 21 CFR part 110 and places
both new requirements into a new Part 117
• Affects all firms required to register under the
Bioterrorism Act, with exemptions
Prevention
16
Hazard Analysis and Risk-
based Preventative Controls
• Science and risk-based to prevent hazards to public
health
• Flexible in that firms develop these to fit their products
and operations in order to significantly minimize or
prevent all food safety hazards reasonably likely to
occur
• Similar to HACCP currently required by FDA for
seafood and juice and is common practice in many
companies worldwide
Prevention
17
How does this differ from
HACCP?
Differs from HACCP in that preventative controls may be required at points other than at critical control points and critical limits would not be required for all preventative controls.
A written Food Safety Plan must be developed and implemented
Prevention
18
What is a Food Safety Plan?
Conduct a Hazard Analysis
Establish Preventative Controls
Monitoring
Corrective Actions
Verification Activities
Recordkeeping
Prevention
19
Components of a
Food Safety Plan
• Must be prepared by a “Qualified Individual”
• “Qualified Individual” has training in standardized curriculum, or be otherwise qualified through job experience to develop and apply a food safety system
• Prepares plan, develops hazard analysis,
validates preventative controls, reviews
records, and conducts reanalysis of food
safety plan
Prevention
20
Mandatory Produce Safety
Standards –Proposed Rule
Establishes science-based standards for growing,
harvesting, packing, and holding produce on domestic
and foreign farms
Identifies routes of microbial contamination
• Agricultural water;
• biological soil amendments of animal origin;
• health and hygiene;
• animals in the growing area;
• equipment, tools, and buildings
Prevention
21
Mandatory Produce Safety
Standards – What’s Covered? Prevention
22
• Covers fruits and vegetables in raw or
natural (unprocessed) state
• Exemptions include agricultural
commodities rarely consumed raw and
products that will be commercially
processed (such as canned)
Mandatory Produce Safety
Standards – When?
Of all FSMA rules, Produce Safety is most contentious
Public meetings with farmers has shed light on practical
problems
FDA itself has publically stated final rule will likely look very
different than proposed rule
Prevention
23
Vision of FSMA: Inspections,
Compliance and Response
24
Key Components
Inspections, Compliance, and Response
• Mandated Inspection Frequency - Immediate
• Records Access – Immediate
• Registration Renewal: Each food facility must renew its U.S. FDA registration every two years -- October 2012 – December 2012 (extended until January 31, 2013)
• Mandatory Recall - Immediate
• Expanded Administrative Detention - Effective July 2011
• Suspension of Registration - Effective June 2011
Inspections, Compliance, & Response
25
Mandated Inspection
Frequency Based on Risk, numbers to increase
Foreign facilities: within one year of the bill’s signing,
FDA is to increase inspections of foreign facilities, and
then increase that number every year for five years.
Inspections, Compliance, & Response
26
Foreign Facility
Inspection Schedule
Inspections, Compliance, & Response
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Insp
ec
tio
ns
Year
27
Registration Renewal
Required for both domestic and foreign facilities
“Facility” is a location that manufactures, processes, packs, or
warehouses food or beverages for human or animal
consumption
Required between October 1st and December 31st of
every even year starting in 2012
Inspections, Compliance, & Response
28
Registration Statistics
Inspections, Compliance, & Response
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
Foreign Facility Domestic Facility
Reg
istr
ati
on
s
Facility Type
Registrations prior to December 31, 2012
29
Registration Statistics 2/19/14
FDA purged database of those that failed to renew in
early 2013
New February 19, 2014 statistics now show:
81,575 US Facilities
115,753 Non-U.S. Facilities
TOTAL: 197,328 versus +/- 430,000 in 2012
Approximately 50% of all registrations were deleted
Inspections, Compliance, & Response
30
Registration Statistics 2/19/14
China: 10,180 USA: 81,575
Japan: 13,296 France: 9,952
Korea: 3,805 Italy: 9,243
India: 3,133 Mexico: 8,465
Taiwan: 1,874 Canada: 6,533
Thailand: 1,555 Spain: 4,426
Vietnam: 1,385 Chile: 2,603
Indonesia: 970 Germany: 2,287
Malaysia: 903 Singapore: 743 (2009)
Inspections, Compliance, & Response
31
Registration Renewal
Facilities that failed to renew must now re-register
A new number is issued
Failure to renew will prevent issuance of a Prior Notice
Confirmation Number, therefore preventing the
submission (the FFRM and PNSI are now linked)
Inspections, Compliance, & Response
32
Suspension of Registration
FDA may by order suspend the
registration of a facility
reasonable probability of causing
serious adverse health consequences
or death to humans or animals
If the registration of a facility
is suspended
no person can import or export food
into the United States from that
facility
Inspections, Compliance, & Response
33
Vision of FSMA: Import Safety
34
Key Components
Import Safety
• Voluntary Qualified Importer Program
• Guidance Document Not Yet Released
• Foreign Supplier Verification Program
• Proposed Rule Released July 26, 2013
• Comment Period ended on January 27, 2014
Import Safety
35
Voluntary Qualified Importer
Program (VQIP)
FDA to establish a Voluntary Qualified Importer Program
(VQIP) to expedite entry into the United States of
imported food from eligible, qualified importers.
FDA will qualify eligible importers to participate in
VQIP based on risk considerations.
Import Safety
36
Voluntary Qualified
Importer Program
FDA will charge a User Fee for importers wishing to
enroll in the program
Guidance document has not yet been issued
Similar to C-TPAT?
Will large importers and retailers embrace VQIP?
Will small importers be excluded by cost or complexities
of the program?
Import Safety
37
Foreign Supplier Verification
Program for Importers of Food Import Safety
All importers must
establish, maintain, and
follow a FSVP
38
Foreign Supplier Verification
Program for Importers of Food
Proposed regulations vary based on type of food
(processed, produce, dietary supplements)
Important: the obligations are placed on the importer,
which in turn will place some obligations on the foreign
manufacturer
Import Safety
39
Foreign Supplier Verification
Program for Importers of Food
Key components:
Importer to maintain list of foreign suppliers
Perform supplier compliance status review
Conduct hazard analysis through verification activities
Conduct investigative & corrective actions (as needed)
Reassess FSVP periodically
Supply importer identification (DUNs Number)
Maintain Records
Import Safety
40
Conduct Compliance Status
Review
Importers required to review compliance status of the
food and foreign supplier before importing.
FDA Warning Letters
Import Alerts
Certification requirements
What does this mean for
you? Importers will be
watching you more closely.
Import Safety
41
Periodic Reassessment of the
FSVP
Importers required to reassess their FSVP within three
years of establishing the plan
Sooner if they become aware of new information about potential
hazards associated with the food
How does that affect you? Importers will look to you for
updated information on hazards
Import Safety
42
Modified FSVP Requirements
Proposed rule defines “very small importer” and “very
small foreign supplier” as having annual food sales of no
more than $500,000
Eligibility would have to be documented annually and
importers would have to obtain written assurances every 2
years that their suppliers are complying
Import Safety
43
Modified FSVP
Requirements
Food from a foreign supplier in good compliance
standing with a food safety system that FDA has officially recognized as comparable or equivalent
New Zealand has been recognized
Perhaps the European Union and Canada next?
Import Safety
44
Modified FSVP
Requirements Modified FSVP requirements for Juice and seafood from facilities compliant with HACCP
Alcoholic beverages
Food imported for research or evaluation purposes;
Food imported for personal consumption; and
Food that is transshipped or imported for further processing and export.
Import Safety
45
46
Vision of FSMA: Enhanced Partnerships
Key Components
Enhanced Partnerships
• Third Party Audits / Certification
• Proposed Rule Released July 26, 2013
• Comment Period ended January 27, 2014
• Capacity Building
• Outreach through training
• Establishment of overseas offices
• China offices of FDA established
Enhanced Partnerships
47
Third Party Audit Concept
Allows FDA to leverage industry audits
A credible third-party program will help to facilitate entry
of certain imported foods under VQIP
A comprehensive third-party program will create a new
path for working with foreign governments
Enhanced Partnerships
48
Third-Party Audits
Proposed Rule covers development of a program to establish Accreditation Bodies and Third Party Auditors seeking recognition by the FDA. Encompasses:
The monitoring and oversight of participating accreditation bodies and auditors
The auditing and certification of foreign food facilities
Notifying the FDA of conditions in an audited facility that could cause or contribute to a serious risk to the public health.
Enhanced Partnerships
49
Capacity Building
FSMA directs FDA to develop a comprehensive plan to
expand the technical, scientific, and regulatory food
safety capacity of foreign governments and their
respective food industries
Enhanced Partnerships
50
New User Fees under
FSMA
New FDA User Fees: October 1, 2011
FDA Hourly Rates for Fiscal Year 2014:
$237 per hour, domestic
$302 per hour, foreign activities
Charged for:
DWPE Petition Review
Reconditioning
Re-Inspections
VQIP
Enhanced Partnerships
51
New User Fees under
FSMA
Re-inspection Fees are calculated for:
Traveling to and from the facility
Preparing reports
Analyzing samples
Examining labels
Thus far, FDA has not issued re-inspection fees
Guidance document pending
Enhanced Partnerships
52
New User Fees under FSMA
Re-inspection Fees Will be charged to the facility’s U.S. Agent listed in Section 7 of
the food facility registration module
An importer who was listed as the U.S. Agent in a foreign registration may be liable even if they were listed in 2003 and no longer conduct business with the foreign facility
Enhanced Partnerships
53
U.S. Agent Responsibilities
US Agent is designated in
Section 7, FFRM
US Agent must:
Reside in USA
Be available 24/7
Answer questions as
though they are
answering for registrant
Should know how to
deal with FDA.
Enhanced Partnerships
54
Takeaways…
FSMA phased in over years
New rules will have a great impact on Asian and firms
worldwide
Final Rules likely to be different than proposed rules,
especially for Produce
Smaller manufacturers who ignore rules will likely face
greater risk of Import Alert
55
In Summary…
U.S. remains a market of volume and high value
Dedicate resources now to food safety to avoid expensive
problems later
FSMA is phased in over time, final rules yet to be
announced.
Once final rules are released, Registrar Corp will offer a
range of services to help foreign manufacturers comply
with FSMA.
56
About Us
Registration & US Agent Service
FDA Prior Notice Submissions
Labeling and Ingredient Reviews
LACF Registration & Process Filing Submissions
Detention Assistance & Removal from DWPE
Mock FDA Inspections
HACCP and Food Safety Plan Development
57
58
Contact Us: USA Office
Registrar Corp Headquarters
144 Research Drive
Hampton, Virginia
USA 23666
P: +757-224-0177
F: +757-224-0179
www.registrarcorp.com
16/10/2013 59
60
Registrar Corp Office in China
Registrar Corp's Office in China
(美国FDA REGISTRAR公司深圳代表处隶属于Registrar Corp公司,负责其在中国境内相关业务。)
Room 606-608, Block A, Rongchao Binhai Building,
No. 5 Xinghua 1st Road, Bao'an CBD
Shenzhen City
People's Republic of China 518101
Phone: 400-860-0210 / +86-755-82070649
Fax: +86-755-82070866
Mobile: +86-18926783540 / 13794462358
Email: [email protected] www.registrarcorp.com
61
Questions?