us doe building windows and envelope r&d - retrofit focus€¦ · us doe building windows and...
TRANSCRIPT
US DOE Building Windows and Envelope R&D - Retrofit Focus
Marc LaFranceTechnology Development ManagerBuilding Technologies ProgramOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyU.S. Department of Energy
EcoBuild December 10th 2009
Joseph DeringerVisiting ResearcherBuilding Technologies DepartmentLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1
Facing our Energy Challenges
President Barack Obama
“We're using 19th and 20th century technologies to battle 21st century problems like climate change and energy security.”
Remarks of President Barack Obama, Signing of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, February 17, 2009
Secretary of Energy Dr. Steven Chu
“Make it white,”Secretary Steven Chu, Daily Show, July 21, 2009
2
Building Technologies Goal
Net-Zero Energy Buildings by 2025Net-Zero Energy Homes by 2020Low incremental cost.
3
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
US$ (
in th
ousa
nds)
$1.0B
$2.2B
In addition to FY09 funding, EERE received $16.8 billion in funding through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
EERE Budget History (2000-2009)
4
EERE Recovery Act Funding
$16.8B EERE Recovery Act Funding
$2.5
$14.35
EERE Discretionary RD&D
EERE Directed Funding
Amounts are in billion US Dollars
5
Coal power plants – CCS rebuilds with EOR
Coal power plant –CCS new builds with EOR
2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.80.6
100
150
0.4
-100
-150
-200
-250
50
-50
Cost$2005/ton CO2e
0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.00.2 2.42.2 2.60.8VolumeGt/year
0
Source: December 2008 analysis conducted by EERE with McKinsey using2008 DOE technology performance projections; mid-range case
EERE Energy efficiency
EERE Transport
EERE Power
DOE Nuclear/CCS
Cars fuel economy packages
Light trucks fuel economy packages
Cars Hybridization
Light Trucks Hybridization
Residential electronics
Commercial electronics
Residential buildings – lighting
Residential buildings –new shell improvements
Commercial LED
Commercial buildings –New shell improvements
Commercial buildings –CFL lighting
Biofuels cellulosic
Control systems
Commercial buildings – combined heat and power
Residential buildings –Shell retrofits
Power plant conversion efficiency improvements
Industry –combined heat and power
Residential water heaters
Industrial process improvement
Coal mining -CH4
Hydro-thermal
Enhanced geothermal systems
Manufacturing -HFCs
Existing hydro efficiency gains
Existing hydro capacity increases
Natural gas and petroleum systems management
Residential windows new build
Nuclear
Cars Plug-In Hybridization
Afforestation -pastureland
Solar CSPLand-based wind
Reforestation
New hydro in existing dams
Biomass cofiring
Afforestation –cropland
Distributed PV
Commercial HVAC equipment efficiency
Coal powerplant – CCS new builds
Industry – CCS new builds on carbon-intensive processes
Offshore wind
Coal powerplant – CCS rebuilds
Residential HVAC equipment efficiency
Coal-to-gas existing plants
Car HydrogenFuel CellVehicles
28
10
17
9
1421
Industrial
TransportPower
DOE Nuclear/CCS
Non-DOEBuildings
Technology Share of Abatement Volume%
Coal power plants – CCS rebuilds with EOR
Coal power plant –CCS new builds with EOR
2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.80.6
100
150
0.4
-100
-150
-200
-250
50
-50
Cost$2005/ton CO2e
0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.00.2 2.42.2 2.60.8VolumeGt/year
0
Source: December 2008 analysis conducted by EERE with McKinsey using2008 DOE technology performance projections; mid-range case
EERE Energy efficiency
EERE Transport
EERE Power
DOE Nuclear/CCS
EERE Energy efficiencyEERE Energy efficiency
EERE TransportEERE Transport
EERE PowerEERE Power
DOE Nuclear/CCSDOE Nuclear/CCS
Cars fuel economy packages
Light trucks fuel economy packages
Cars Hybridization
Light Trucks Hybridization
Residential electronics
Commercial electronics
Residential buildings – lighting
Residential buildings –new shell improvements
Commercial LED
Commercial buildings –New shell improvements
Commercial buildings –CFL lighting
Biofuels cellulosic
Control systems
Commercial buildings – combined heat and power
Residential buildings –Shell retrofits
Power plant conversion efficiency improvements
Industry –combined heat and power
Residential water heaters
Industrial process improvement
Coal mining -CH4
Hydro-thermal
Enhanced geothermal systems
Manufacturing -HFCs
Existing hydro efficiency gains
Existing hydro capacity increases
Natural gas and petroleum systems management
Residential windows new build
Nuclear
Cars Plug-In Hybridization
Afforestation -pastureland
Solar CSPLand-based wind
Reforestation
New hydro in existing dams
Biomass cofiring
Afforestation –cropland
Distributed PV
Commercial HVAC equipment efficiency
Coal powerplant – CCS new builds
Industry – CCS new builds on carbon-intensive processes
Offshore wind
Coal powerplant – CCS rebuilds
Residential HVAC equipment efficiency
Coal-to-gas existing plants
Car HydrogenFuel CellVehicles
28
10
17
9
1421
Industrial
TransportPower
DOE Nuclear/CCS
Non-DOEBuildings
Technology Share of Abatement Volume%
EERE Technologies –Potential Carbon Abatement
Note: Preliminary analysis, under technical review
Energy efficiency measures represent most
of the no-cost options
BTP believes opportunities for Buildings are even greater than predicted
6
Buildings40%
Transport28%
Industry32%
US Energy in Buildings
Electricity – 72% for Buildings
$370 Billion AnnuallyNatural Gas – 55% for Buildings
7
Fenestration Impacts on Building End Use Energy Consumption
Buildings consume 39% of total U.S. energy• 71% of electricity and 54% of natural gas
8
Building Consumption –Envelope Relationship
Heating23%
Cooling13%
Lighting18%
Ventilation3%
Water Heating10%
Electronics7%
Appliances12%
Computers2%
Other12%
Has Impact on 57% of Loads
• 133 Billion $/yr• 13.9% US Energy• 3.5% Global Energy
9
US Window Energy Consumption
• Total Building Energy Use: ~ 40 Quads• Window-Related: 4.1 Q + 1Q Lighting
– includes infiltration losses
“Quad”: 1 quadrillion BTU ≈ 1 EJ ≈ 1% of annual US Energy Consumption
Window-Related Energy Consumption (Quads)
Residential Commercial Heating 1.65 0.96 Cooling 1.02 0.52
Total 2.67 1.48 Daylight: +1 Q
10
1976 Perspective: Code Official’s View of the Ideal Windows
2007 Perspective: Architect’s View of the Ideal Windows
Two Contrasting Views of Energy Efficiency
Window R&D
12
Window R&D – Core Areas
• Commercialize Cost Effective R5 Windows
• Develop Affordable Dynamic Windows
• Develop Next Generation of R10 Windows
• Promote Efficient Products with Enabling Research
• Develop Integrated Daylighting Strategies
• Develop Fenestration Test and Rating Standards Internationally
13
Next Generation of Windows• Highly Insulating
– Goal U value 0.10 (SI U value 0.56)– Possible vacuum glazings
• Dynamic solar control– Passive heating– Dramatic peak cooling reduction– Market ready, prices will drop with more investment
Prototype – Concept Window (Highly Insulating and DynamicU Value 0.18 (SI U value 1.0)SHGC 0.04 – 0.34)Low cost unsealed center lite
14
Vision: Energy Losers --> Neutral --> Net Energy Suppliers
• Heating climates– Reduce heat losses (U) so that ambient solar
energy balances and exceeds loss– Need very low U but moderate solar gain
• Cooling climates– Reduce cooling loads: very low SHGF– Static control -> dynamic control
• Mixed climates– Requires dynamic solar control
• All climates– Replace electric lighting with daylight
• Electricity supply options– Integrate Photovoltaics with Glazing
15
As we move towards ZEB, windows will play an important role and offer a large opportunity for energy savings –Passive Heating
Bars above black line represent window energy loadOutlined in ASHRAE and ACEEE Peer Reviewed Papers
Highly Insulating and Dynamic Windows
16
Single Glazed w/Storm, $1310
Double Glazed, $1218
Double w/Low-E, $1120
“SuperWindow”, $960
House with no windows, $1000
Savings from Better WindowsAnnual Heating Cost simulated for a heating climate
Conclusion: Good windows outperform insulated walls in winter!
17
“Evolution” of Advanced Windows
• Highly insulating systems– Reduces winter heating loads– Multiple technologies for glass
• Aerogel• Vacuum glazing• Multipane, low-E gas fill
– Better Frames– Climate dependence– Cost
• Dynamic windows for solar control– Dynamic optical switch from high transmission to low transmission– Reduces summer cooling load; reduces glare – Multiple technologies
• Electrochromic, thermochromic, photochromic, LCD,…– Integration with window, building– Cost
18
New Sash and Frame Technologies
• “New” Materials– Fiberglass– Thermoset plastics– Foam– Composites - wood fiber and vinyl
• Hybrid Designs– Metal, vinyl clad– Structural reinforcements– Co-extruded– Metal-Plastic-Wood hybrids
19
Storm Windows:Interior and Exterior
20
Next Generation Prototype “Zero Energy” Window
• Current Prototype– Dynamic Glazing; SHGC (0.04 – 0.34)
• Electrochromic glazing– Highly Insulating; U Value 0.18, R 5.6
• Ongoing R&D– Increased dynamic range– Cost-effective production– Frame heat transfer R&D
(50% of heat lost through 20% of area)– Systems benefits:
• Better comfort• No perimeter ducts• No central heating system??
21
Highly Insulating R5 Production Engineering Solicitation
• DOE Selected GED Integrated Solutions in partnership with PPG, and other major window companies
• Goal – Affordable R5 – (U value of 0.22 or less for operable window
and 0.20 or less for fixed window) – with price premium less than $4/ft2 compared
to conventional double pane low e • Multiple paths to market, window
companies and IGU sales– Product availability 12 – 24 months– Second round RFP closed Aug 18th
– 50% cost share requirement– Strong response, evaluation underway
22
Savings with Clear and Low-E Storm Windows
• Whole house heating energy savings over a winter season in Chicago for new storms:– Clear storm windows 8-18%– Low-e storm windows 19-27%
• Estimated U-values:– Clear storm windows: 0.49 Btu/h-ft2-F– Low-e storm windows: 0.36 Btu/h-ft2-F
• Payback: 3-12 years
23
Windows Volume Purchase
www.R-5WindowsVolumePurchase.com
R5 (~U 0.2) and Low E Storm Volume Purchase
Develop Buyer Groups
Develop Draft RFP Specifications with Buyers and Possible Manufacturer Bidders
Issue RFP – Dec 2009
Make Awards for Purchasing Schedule
Promote Winner’s Products with Partners
24
What are the Best Solar Optical Properties for a Window Anywhere in the U.S.?
Varies with Location and Orientation.
Varies with Season and Weather.
Varies with Occupant Use Patterns
So the best solution is a window whose properties are variable.
25
Solar Load Control
• Minimize Cooling Loads but admit Daylight
Conventional Options:• Glass: Clear - Tinted - Reflective• Overhangs, awnings, fins,
vegetation• Shades, blinds, drapes
• Goal: “Cool” Windows and “Smart” Windows
26
Spectrally Selective “Cool” Glazings
• Spectral control- transmit light, reject near-IR heat
• Equal daylight with only 50% of solar gain
• IG to minimize SHGC
Technology:• Selective Absorbers
– blue-green tints• Selective reflectors
– modified low-E coatings– coated glass and plastic– Multilayer dielectric
Transmittance -vs- Wavelength
27
Light to Solar Gain Ratio
Light to Solar Gain Ratio for insulating glass units for all glasses in LBNL IGDB
LSG = 1.0LSG = 2.0
LSG: Light to Solar Gain Ratio = Tvis / SHGC
Tvis
SHGC
28
Smart Coatings for Dynamic Control of Windows Balancing Cooling and Daylighting
• Flexible, optimized control of solar gain and daylight
• Passive control– Photochromic - light sensitive– Thermochromic - heat sensitive
• Active control– Liquid Crystal– Suspended particle display (SPD)
– Electrochromic• Active control preferred; but
requires wiring windows for power and control
“OFF”
“ON”
29
Electrochromic Field Tests 1999
• GSA Building • Performance
assessment -Understand EC operation in a real building:– color – glare– privacy – switching speed– peak load – energy savings– occupant impacts
30
Engineering and Occupant Response Studies with Switchable Electrochromic Windows
• LBNL Façade Field Test Facility (2005-06)
31
FY09 Integrated Daylighting and Smart Window Demonstration in EE-1 Conference Room
32
Characteristics of SuccessfulDaylighting Systems
• Designed as Integrated Building System– Envelope <-> Lighting <-> HVAC
• Provide Daylight Control– Spectral control to reduce cooling loads– Dynamic control of intensity and direction
• Support changing Occupant Needs:– performance, comfort, satisfaction
• Decision support tools for Architects, Engineers,...– design/analysis across life cycle
• Link Design --> Operations and Maintenance
33
Directional Light Control
• Conventional control of direction of light– Glass block– Fritted glass– Shading systems– Light shelves
• New Options– Prismatic glazings – Holographic materials– Laser cut panels– Light pipes– Fiber optics
• Dimmable lighting• Addressable• (Affordable) (1/3 original cost estimate)• (Multifunctional)
Intelligent Lighting and Shade Control
New York Times office with dimmable lights and automated
shading
Occupied 2007
• Automated Shaded
• (Multifunctional)
35
WINDOW6 Software Suite
Design /Simulation Tools
DOE-2, EnergyPlusRadiance
THERM(Window
Frame)
Optics(WindowGlass)
WINDOW(Whole Window)
IGDB(Specular Glass Data Source)
CGDB(Complex Glazing Data Base)
RESFEN(Whole Building
Residential)
COMFEN(Whole Building
Commercial)
http://windows.lbl.gov/software
NFRC Ratings
and Labels
• Design tools for advanced products• ISO 15099 Compliant• NFRC Ratings
36
Commercial Windows Websitewww.commercialwindows.org
37
Window Technical Targets
Characteristics Units Calendar Year
2003Status 2007 Status 2010 Target 2015 Target 2020 Target
Energy Consumption Improvement*
Reduction in Window Energy Use
Base ENERGY STAR (Low
E)20-30% 30-40% 40-50% 40-60%
1. Dynamic Solar Control
Incremental Price ($/ft2) 85-100 50 20 8 5
Size (ft2) 8 16 20-25 25+ 25+
Visual Transmittance 60 to 4% 60 to 4% 65 to 3% 65 to 2% 65 to 2%
SHGC 0.50 to 0.10 0.50 to 0.10 0.53 to 0.09 0.53 to 0.09 0.53 to 0.09
Durability (ASTM Tests) Medium High High High High
Dynamic Response(Speed/Variable Tint) Slow/On-off Slow/
On-offSlow/On-off
Moderate/Variable
Fast/Variable
2. Highly Insulated Windows
U-Value 0.33-0.50 0.20-0.25 0.17 0.10 0.10
Incremental Cost ($/ft2) IG Base Cost: 3 5 6 4 3
3. Daylight Systems
Lighting Energy Savings 40% 50% 50% 60% 60%
Perimeter Zone Depth (ft) 12 15 20 20 30
Incremental Cost ($/ft2) 3 8 8 6 6
4. Enabling Technology Research for Efficient Products
Tool Capability for Residential (R), Commercial (C) and New Technology (N)
R – YesC – NoN – No
R – FullyC – Partial
N – No
R – FullyC – PartialN – Partial
Assess need for
industry support
Assess need for
industry support
38
Goals: Output
• R5 Highly Insulated Windows– Needs to be no more than $2 to $4 per square above double
low e– Available within 12 to 24 months– Need for ZEH in mixed and cold climates, ZEB in cold (maybe
mixed)
• Dynamic Windows– Needs to be no more than $5 to $10 above double pane low e– Affordable products should be available in the 2015 time frame– Dramatic peak cooling load reduction, promotes daylight,
passive heating in mixed climates with double low e now, and in cold climates when combined with vacuum glazing
39
Goals Output (continued)
• R10 Highly Insulated Windows– Until FY10 limited funding received, major at risk item. Minimal effort
in the past due to funding constraints. Smaller market than R5. – Cost needs to be in the $3 to $6 per square foot above double low e.– Anticipate ARRA RFP to provide new project. Old EverSealed
project on hiatus but reinvigorated within last 6 months.– Cannot commit to schedule since just received resources, goal is to
have affordable products in the 2015 to 2018 time frame.– Needed for ZEH/ZEB in cold climates
• Daylighting– Small project prior to FY10, initiating major increase in activity in
collaboration with CEC. – Moving from a 200 to 400K project to a 2.5M project annually. – More planning and coordination required. – Age old opportunity, needs to be fully planned and coordinated with
Commercial Team.
40
Subprogram Status in five years (2015)
• Accomplishments– R5 Windows widely available from multiple sources at cost effective
prices– Dynamic Windows available from multiple sources at affordable prices
for numerous applications but might not yet be fully cost effective for energy efficiency. May be cost effective when full consideration of impacts including increasing value of peak demand.
– Retrofit Products including blinds, awnings, shades, etc are fully rated by NFRC and have greater attention of voluntary programs.
• Remaining Tasks to Achieve ZEB– R10 Windows “truly” commercialized but require greater production
capacity to be cost effective– Daylighting Strategies are much more prevalent but still require more
work to be widely available– Enabling Research – like changing the oil, needs to continue to support
emerging technologies
41
How to Achieve Goals: Critical Paths
• Critical Paths: Residential– Highly insulating – High Solar Gain with Dynamic and Vacuum Glazing (dependent upon
cost compared to other non-window strategies)– R5 low risk, R10 and dynamic cost effective for residential much
higher risk– Conventional multi glazed products reduce solar heat gain potential
• Critical Paths: Commercial– Dynamic windows can provide daylight opportunity that has not yet
become market viable– Peak demand is critical for ZEB
• Why are the selected paths the best way to achieve goals– Windows are the weak link in the building envelope– External shading not fully effective and difficult to maintain/wash
windows, etc– ARPA E just selected and awarded a 4.9M dynamic window project
this is 5 times our previous awards. More funding than the entire windows program prior to FY10.
Envelope R&D
43
Envelope R&D – Core Areas
• Next Generation of Attic/Roof Systems• New Material Development
– Dynamic and Advanced Insulation– Dynamic membranes– Dynamic roof surfaces
• Advanced Walls• Initiate Foundation Systems• Enabling Research
– Cool Roofs– Moisture design, analysis and modeling– Air barrier– Standards development
44
• Advanced walls to reach R20 (U = 0.28 SI) in 3.5” (9cm) cavity, exterior insulation systems, R30 (U = 0.19 SI) total wall
• Next Generation of Attic/Roof System to save 50 Percent Energy
• New Material Development– 100 R&D Award in 2009
for phase change material (PCM) insulation
– Higher performing foams and aerogels
– Dynamic membranes
Thermal Envelope R&D
45
Next Generation of Roofing/Attics
• Integrated solutions for building type and climate• Key elements to develop and integrate
– Cool Roofs (lighter colors and near-infrared (NIR) reflective pigments)
– Thermal Mass– Above Deck Ventilation– Radiant Barriers– Location and Higher Performing Insulations
46
Next Generation Roof/Attic R&D Concepts
ShinglesFoil backed OSBUpperair channelRadiantbarriers
Upperair channel
Lower airchannelInsulation w/ foilGypsum board
PCMs
47
PCM Shaves Peak Demandand Reduces Night Sky Losses
Peak Demand Reduction
Potential to Reduce Peak by 90 Percent – Measured Data
Cost effective solutions for hot climate should achieve 50 percent reduction (residential)
48
What is a Cool Roof?
CRRC only looks at surfaceproperties:
•Solar Reflectance•Thermal Emittance
CRRC does not set minimum requirements
Credit: Significant material in this presentation is from the Cool Roof Rating Council
49
Real World Example
Photos from the CEC’s Consumer Energy Center, courtesy of Hydrostop
81 C 34 C
50
Energy Savings Benefits
• Lower roof top and building temperatures–Less heat transfer–Increased occupant comfort–Reduced AC load
• Lower building occupant’s electricity bills• Reduce peak electricity demand (avoid black-outs)• Through cool roof and other urban heat island
mitigation measures (cool pavement, passive cooling designs), avoid the need for the addition of air conditioning that is driven by increased wealth
LBNL estimates Worldwide energy savings of $27 billion (2008)
51
Environmental Benefits
• Reduced energy consumption means less air pollution from power plants
• Global warming mitigation• Reduce Urban Heat Island Effect
–Lower ambient air temperature –Improves local air quality–Reduction in heat and
smog-related health issues
52
Comparison of Cooling Loads (Heat gain) Relative to White Control System
Garden Roofs Show Improved Performance - Preliminary Results
53
DOE/ORNL Conducting In-depth Air Barrier Research
• Sophisticated energy performance measurements
• Supports real world performance and code activity
• 20 wall panels with 13 manufacturing supplier partners and Syracuse Univ.
• Needed to support higher code levels leading to ZEB
54
Solutions you can install today!
• Cool roof with reflective IR pigments, metal, clay tile, concrete tile, asphalt (still limited)
• Cool wall coatings with reflective IR pigments and new vinyl siding with same surface coatings
• Moisture tolerant Exterior Insulation Finishing Systems (EIFS) with drain plane
• Broad range of insulation systems including new aerogels for stud caps and thermal shorts
55
Application:• Thermal bridge in steel and wood framing• Supplied in strips ⅜” thick x 1 ½” wide x 8’
long• Applied onto a building’s framing, inside or
outside, prior to sheathing. • Applied with a peel-and-stick adhesive
backing or staples• Adds an R-4.0 to standard wall framing• Does not alter standard construction
ASPEN Aerogel Supported by DOE via Competitive Solicitations
56
Envelope Technical Targets
Advanced Attic/Roof Technology TargetsCharacteristics 2009 Status 2010 Target 2015 Target
Advanced attic/roof system
R-30 to R-38 Dynamic annual performance equal to conventional R-45
Improved dynamic annual performance at no extra cost
Enhanced reflectivity on attractive dark-colored roof products
30% solar reflectivity on premium-priced products
40% solar reflectivity Wider color space and increased availability on regular products
Advanced Wall Systems Technology Targets
Characteristics 2009 Status 2010 Target 2015 Target
Advanced wall systems
Static R-20 prototype in 3.5 inches thick space
Dynamic annual performance equal to conventional R-25
Improved dynamic annual performance at reasonable extra cost
Enhanced reflectivity on attractive wall coating products
30% solar reflectivity on premium-priced products
40% solar reflectivity Wider color space and increased availability on regular products
57
Goals: Output • Next Generation of Attic/Roofs
– 50% Final Design for Hot Climate Ready for Building America ($1.00 to $1.50 per square foot)
– Mixed and Cold Climate still in development– More cost effective option than R50/Heel Truss Solutions
• New Materials– Dynamic insulation commercialized, still has cost premium – Cost effective today for some applications, wide spread cost
effective in the 2012 - 2014 time frame– Dynamic membranes – performance fully characterized (perm vs
relative humidity chart) but still have not found viable manufacturer partner
– Dynamic roof surfaces – variable solar reflectivity, prototypes had great performance but low durability, still in development
• Advanced Walls – EIFS research completed, viable solutions for new and retrofit – Advanced SIPS in development for higher performing phenolic
foams– Double stud evaluation
58
Unaddressed Opportunities
• ARRA Funding and Priority Items address most unaddressed opportunities –BUT HOW DOES THIS GET MAINTAINED??
• Greater support for demonstrations/case studies of advanced products
• Growing demand for technical support for retrofit programs – limited resources
• Envelope program has multiple technology paths that reduces risks
59
Contact and Information Resources
Stephen SelkowitzBuilding Technologies DepartmentLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBuilding 90-3111Berkeley, CA 94720 USAE-mail: [email protected]
More Info: http://windows.lbl.govNew York Times projecthttp://windows.lbl.gov/comm_perf/newyo
rktimes.htmAdvanced Facades projecthttp:lowenergyfacades.lbl.govhttp://gaia.lbl.gov/hpbfCommercial Web Sitehttp://www.commercialwindows.umn.edu
P Marc LaFrance, CEMTechnology Development ManagerBuilding Technologies ProgramOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyUS Department of Energy
[email protected] 1-202-586-4617www.eere.doe.gov