total energy for the future

EASTERN ENERGY LIMITEDEASTERN ENERGY LIMITED 11

EASTERN ENERGY LIMITEDEASTERN ENERGY LIMITED

JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDJHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDReplacement, Optimization. Repowering & Replacement, Optimization. Repowering &

Modernization of Existing Old Russian Units Modernization of Existing Old Russian Units at Patratu Thermal Power Station at Patratu, at Patratu Thermal Power Station at Patratu,

Jharkhand StateJharkhand State

TOTAL ENERGY FOR THE FUTURETOTAL ENERGY FOR THE FUTURE

EEL


EASTERN ENERGY LIMITEDEASTERN ENERGY LIMITED

A FULL SERVICE ENERGY COMPANY WHICH A FULL SERVICE ENERGY COMPANY WHICH SPECIALIZES IN SPECIALIZES IN

ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION REPLACEMENT, OPTIMIZATION, REPOWERING REPLACEMENT, OPTIMIZATION, REPOWERING

REFURBISHMENT & MODERNIZATION REFURBISHMENT & MODERNIZATION OPERATION & MAINTENANCEOPERATION & MAINTENANCE

&&ENERGY CONSERVATIONENERGY CONSERVATION


EASTERN ENERGY LIMITED'SEASTERN ENERGY LIMITED'S

PROFESSIONAL STAFF PROVIDES PROFESSIONAL STAFF PROVIDES EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE IN EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE IN

DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN, APPLICATION, DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN, APPLICATION, IMPLEMENTATION,MANAGEMENT, IMPLEMENTATION,MANAGEMENT,

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THERMAL POWER STATIONS, ENERGY THERMAL POWER STATIONS, ENERGY

SYSTEMS AND ENERGY RELATED SYSTEMS AND ENERGY RELATED TECHNOLOGIESTECHNOLOGIES


QUALIFICATIONS OF ENGINEERING STAFFQUALIFICATIONS OF ENGINEERING STAFF

CERTIFIED COGENERATION PROFESSIONALCERTIFIED COGENERATION PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL ENERGY MANAGERPROFESSIONAL ENERGY MANAGER PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER + 75 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN COGENERATION AND ENERGY + 75 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN COGENERATION AND ENERGY

FIELDFIELD + 100 YEARS SENIOR MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE IN THE + 100 YEARS SENIOR MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE IN THE

ENGINEERING FIELDENGINEERING FIELD +50 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN REPLACEMTN. OPTIMIZATION, +50 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN REPLACEMTN. OPTIMIZATION,

REPOWERING, REFURBISHMENT & MODERNIZATION (R&M) REPOWERING, REFURBISHMENT & MODERNIZATION (R&M) OF THERMAL POWER STATIONS (TPS)OF THERMAL POWER STATIONS (TPS)

RECOGNIZED EXPERTS IN REFRIGERATION, STEAM, RECOGNIZED EXPERTS IN REFRIGERATION, STEAM, COGENERATION , RETROFIT & REPOWERING AND ENERGY COGENERATION , RETROFIT & REPOWERING AND ENERGY CONSERVATION AREASCONSERVATION AREAS


Experience & Background of EEL’s Engineering team

Specializingin

Replacement, Refurbishment & Optimization, Repowering,

Modernization & Management ofThermal Power Stations


EXPERTISE OF EEL’s TEAM MEMBERSEXPERTISE OF EEL’s TEAM MEMBERS Power Station ConstructionPower Station Construction Power Station Optimization Power Station Optimization Power Station Operation & MaintenancePower Station Operation & Maintenance Power Station ManagementPower Station Management Condition Assessment Condition Assessment Life Extension AssessmentLife Extension Assessment Rehabilitation AssessmentRehabilitation Assessment Steam & Gas Turbine technologySteam & Gas Turbine technology All types of Boiler systems All types of Boiler systems Fuel Handling SystemsFuel Handling Systems Controls Controls Emissions ControlEmissions Control


One of the key elements for EEL’s success in R&M is that EEL isOne of the key elements for EEL’s success in R&M is that EEL is NOT TIED TO ONLY “ONE” NOT TIED TO ONLY “ONE” type of Technology. EEL will type of Technology. EEL will chose the best technology available based on economics, chose the best technology available based on economics, efficiency, practicality and value engineering. efficiency, practicality and value engineering.

Many companies have an interest to only sell their equipment. An Many companies have an interest to only sell their equipment. An example : A Boiler manufacturers want to sell their boilers & example : A Boiler manufacturers want to sell their boilers & Turbine manufacturers want to sell their turbines etc.Turbine manufacturers want to sell their turbines etc.

EEL will provide the “BEST SELECTION” for the existing EEL will provide the “BEST SELECTION” for the existing conditions.conditions.

On this basis, EEL will conduct “TOTAL R&M PROGRAM” for On this basis, EEL will conduct “TOTAL R&M PROGRAM” for Jharkhand State Electricity Board (JSEB) by Replacement of Jharkhand State Electricity Board (JSEB) by Replacement of existing old Russian Boilers and Optimizing, Repowering & existing old Russian Boilers and Optimizing, Repowering & Modernizing Patratu Thermal Power Station (PTPS). EEL and Modernizing Patratu Thermal Power Station (PTPS). EEL and Alliance partners: Ford, Bacon & Davis (FBD), Alstom Power Alliance partners: Ford, Bacon & Davis (FBD), Alstom Power and General Electric (GE) with JSEB will perfom Feasibility and General Electric (GE) with JSEB will perfom Feasibility Study, Specifications and Detailed project Report. EEL has Study, Specifications and Detailed project Report. EEL has already completed the two Pre-Feasibility Studies and is in already completed the two Pre-Feasibility Studies and is in progress of initiating the Feasibility Study and DPR immediately progress of initiating the Feasibility Study and DPR immediately upon entering Joint Development Agreement (JDA) with JSEB.upon entering Joint Development Agreement (JDA) with JSEB.


PETER J. BILLIAPETER J. BILLIAPROJECT DIRECTORPROJECT DIRECTOR

30 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN THE AREAS OF :30 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN THE AREAS OF :

DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF CORPORATE ENERGY POLICY CORPORATE ENERGY POLICY

MANAGEMENT OF DIVISIONAL MANAGEMENT OF DIVISIONAL MECHANICAL AND MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS.DEPARTMENTS.

DESIGN AND INSTALLATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF COGENERATION OF COGENERATION FACILITIES .FACILITIES .

NEW AND RETROFIT NEW AND RETROFIT REFRIGERATION REFRIGERATION OPTIMIZATION .OPTIMIZATION .

R& M OF THERMAL POWER R& M OF THERMAL POWER STATIONSSTATIONS

CFC REFRIGERANT CFC REFRIGERANT REPLACEMENT .REPLACEMENT .

BOILER OPTIMIZATIONBOILER OPTIMIZATION INDUSTRIAL ENERGY INDUSTRIAL ENERGY

RECOVERY FOR BOILERS, RECOVERY FOR BOILERS, REFRIGERATION, REFRIGERATION, COMPRESSORS, OVEN ,HVAC, COMPRESSORS, OVEN ,HVAC, & PROCESS & PROCESS

EXPERIENCE -EXPERIENCE -DAIRY,BAKERY,LEATHER, DAIRY,BAKERY,LEATHER, CANDY ,FOOD AND POWER CANDY ,FOOD AND POWER INDUSTRIES.INDUSTRIES.

GENERATION OF STEAM AND GENERATION OF STEAM AND ELECTRICITY FROM BIO-ELECTRICITY FROM BIO-MASS AND WASTE MATERIAL MASS AND WASTE MATERIAL ( RDF ). ( RDF ).


JONATHAN P. SIMPSONTURBINE SPECIALIST

Mr.Simpson has over 36 years of experience in Mr.Simpson has over 36 years of experience in engineering, with particular expertise in the design engineering, with particular expertise in the design and operation of turbine generators and their and operation of turbine generators and their auxiliaries.auxiliaries.Mr. Simpson provides expert consulting to projects on steam turbines, combustion turbines, generators, and auxiliaries. Mr. Simpson has been involved in all phases of the design, engineering, application, installation, repair, and maintenance of central station, cogeneration, and industrial turbine generators. Responsibilities have included conceptual design, equipment selection, preparation of specifications, proposal evaluations, system design, client and vendor liaison, performance testing review, refurbishment, vendor design review, and failure analysis.


PETER F. BARTHELO&M / CONDITION ASSESSMENT SPECIALIST

Mr. Barthel has 40 years of experience in the engineering industry. Currently, he is Project Engineer for an on going 4 boiler life extension project in Brazil. His recent experience has been Project Engineering Manager for the storage tank related portion of a grassroots petrochemical plant, Project Engineer for an 18-unit emission reduction program for the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, a two unit life extension program, and a four boiler low NOX burner replacement at a New Hampshire paper mill. He was a member of an assessment team assigned to two Canadian utilities to assess the current operation, maintenance, and capital expenditure plans for 18 coal fired units, Lead Engineer for a 2 unit life extension program and for a 2 unit NOx abatement program.


RICHARD DUNN LIFE EXTENSION / CONDITION ASSESSMENT

SPECIALIST Mr. Dunn has 40 years experience in the power industry,

23 years with a utility in plant operation, engineering and project management and 17 years in consulting engineering. He has led major fossil engineering projects involving both new facilities and rehabilitation. He has also managed a wide range of plant availability and performance improvement projects for coal, oil and gas-fired facilities. He has engineered plant on-line performance monitoring systems and an innovative circulating water spray cooling system. He also has conducted life extension and rehabilitation assessments for a wide range of plants and has been a lecturer on plant rehabilitation for three United Nations seminars for developing countries.


ROSS W. MACDONALDSENIOR ENGINEER

Mr. MacDonald has over 26 years of domestic and foreign power plant construction and maintenance engineering experience. the majority of his assignments have been to assist clients with rehabilitation, overhaul, and retrofit work on gas turbine generators and steam turbine generators both in the U.S. and in foreign countries. The work performed on these units consisted of: Steam turbine purchase for a co-generation plant ,Steam turbine and gas turbine rehabilitation contract management, Steam turbine and gas turbine startups, Fossil steam, nuclear steam, and gas turbine overhaul supervision, Combined cycle power plant testing and due diligence Performance evaluations and test witnessing, Feasibility studies and plant assessments ,Life extension studies, One of his current assignments is to predict the costs of extending the life of 12 steam turbine generators and associated equipment for Trans Alta Utilities in Alberta, Canada.


VINCENT M. LONERGANFUEL HANDLING SPECIALIST

Mr. Lonergan has more than 27 years of experience in the engineering industry.He has been responsible for systems e has been responsible for systems engineering, project work and as Materials Handling engineering, project work and as Materials Handling Equipment Specialist on many projects. This work Equipment Specialist on many projects. This work included the engineering and development of system included the engineering and development of system layouts, preparation of specifications, analysis of bids with layouts, preparation of specifications, analysis of bids with recommendations to purchase, and interfacing with recommendations to purchase, and interfacing with suppliers and contractors, including general approval of suppliers and contractors, including general approval of the contractors' design and engineering. He has been the contractors' design and engineering. He has been involved with coal, coal mining wastes, limestone, peat, involved with coal, coal mining wastes, limestone, peat, refuse derived fuel, biomass, sludge, and ash handling refuse derived fuel, biomass, sludge, and ash handling systems for many projects in the last 14 years.systems for many projects in the last 14 years.

He has been responsible for the independent technical He has been responsible for the independent technical assessment of materials handling systems and equipment assessment of materials handling systems and equipment for a number of cogeneration projects. for a number of cogeneration projects.

In addition, he has worked on various fluidized bed boiler In addition, he has worked on various fluidized bed boiler and fossil-fueled power plants.and fossil-fueled power plants.


WILLIAM A. SMITHPOWER / ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS SPECIALIST

Mr. Smith has more than 19 years of experience in the engineering industry. Currently, Mr. Smith is assigned to a project developing engineering assessments and plant demarcation reports for the divestiture of generating assets of a major utility. Additionally, Mr. Smith is assigned as the Lead Instrumentation & Control Engineer for engineering services in the development and resolution of issues associated with the Republic of Korea’s Korean Next Generation Reactor (KNGR) plant design. While on his current assignment, Mr. Smith has performed short term tasks, including independent review of design assessments at an 850 MW pressurized water reactor plant, technical audit of I&C products for an Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Plant and as a team member providing control system trouble-shooting activities on the Munitions Management Device at the Dugway Proving Grounds.


RICHARD M. GRIEVECONDITION ASSESSMENT SPECIALIST

Mr. Grieve has 24 years of experience in utility and industrial power projects, European heat and power cogeneration plant investment retrofit. Mr. Grieve's assignments have included Project Engineer and Lead Engineer on many projects. In his present position he is responsible for engineering, design, and trouble-shooting for operating coal, oil, and gas fired utility and industrial plants. Currently assigned as Project Engineer for the rehabilitation of power and central heating plants in Lithuania. Also assigned as Project Engineer for selective Non-Catalytic Reduction NOX emission control projects, Lead Engineer for Panther Creek Power Station facility bank reviews, Lead Mechanical Engineer for Canal Electric Unit 2 Gas Conversion, Lead Mechanical Engineer for Consolidated Edison Orimulsion Study, Lead Mechanical Engineer for Eastern study, and Lead Mechanical Engineer for the City of Detroit's Mistersky Station Units 5 and 6 gas conversion and life extension projects.


ROGER H. SIROISBOILER SPECIALIST

Mr. Sirois has over 26 years of experience in power and steam boiler engineering and management. The majority of this experience has been in technical and management positions of increasing responsibility with major boiler manufacturers. He has successfully worked in a team leadership and equipment specialist role on projects related to boiler modifications, boiler mathematical modeling, fuel switching, and NOX and CO emission reduction.

Mr. Sirois is experienced with the design, start-up and troubleshooting of steam boilers applied to numerous processes in the utility, industrial and municipal sectors. He has advanced knowledge in this technology having applied and integrated numerous mechanical engineering principles and industry practices to complete consulting assignments, in the U.S. and overseas, on a broad spectrum of topics and develop boiler performance modeling computer programs. He has applied ASME Code criteria to boiler modification projects requiring pressure part alteration. The successfully completed projects required preparing specifications and bid evaluations, and staying abreast of equipment and system developments.


ENERGY EASTERN LIMITEDENERGY EASTERN LIMITED OFFERS OFFERS

IT’S CUSTOMERS IT’S CUSTOMERS AN EXCITING ARRAY OF INNOVATIVE AN EXCITING ARRAY OF INNOVATIVE ENERGY SYSTEMS AND SERVICESENERGY SYSTEMS AND SERVICES


ENERGY SERVICESENERGY SERVICES

ENERGY AUDITS AND STUDIESENERGY AUDITS AND STUDIES COGENERATIONCOGENERATION : :

--SIMPLE OR COMBINED SIMPLE OR COMBINED CYCLE , DIESELCYCLE , DIESEL

--RANKINE CYCLE (STEAM )RANKINE CYCLE (STEAM )

-REFUSE DERIVED FUEL -REFUSE DERIVED FUEL PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL

ENGINEERING ANDENGINEERING AND

ENERGY CONSERVATION :ENERGY CONSERVATION :

-FOOD INDUSTRY -FOOD INDUSTRY

-DAIRY INDUSTRY -DAIRY INDUSTRY

-LEATHER INDUSTRY-LEATHER INDUSTRY

-CHEMICAL INDUSTRY-CHEMICAL INDUSTRY

-POWER INDUSTRY-POWER INDUSTRY

AREAS OF SPECIALIZATIONAREAS OF SPECIALIZATION-COGENERATION FACILITIES-COGENERATION FACILITIES-BOILER & STEAM SYSTEM S-BOILER & STEAM SYSTEM S- AMMONIA REFRIGERATION - AMMONIA REFRIGERATION

-REFRIGERATION OPTIMIZATION-REFRIGERATION OPTIMIZATION-ENERGY RECOVERY-ENERGY RECOVERY-ENERGY CONSERVATION -ENERGY CONSERVATION

- OPERATION, MAINTENANCE - OPERATION, MAINTENANCE & MANAGEMENT& MANAGEMENT-ALTERNATIVE BOILER FUEL -ALTERNATIVE BOILER FUEL SYSTEMSSYSTEMS-RE-POWERING & -RE-POWERING & REFURBISHMENT OF POWER REFURBISHMENT OF POWER PLANTSPLANTS


EASTERN ENERGY LIMITEDEASTERN ENERGY LIMITEDINCORPORATES INCORPORATES

“ THE TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT ““ THE TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT “ WHICH OPTIMIZE ENERGY UTILIZATIONWHICH OPTIMIZE ENERGY UTILIZATION

THIS CONCEPT IS APPLIED TO ALL THIS CONCEPT IS APPLIED TO ALL OF OUR ENERGY APPLICATIONSOF OUR ENERGY APPLICATIONS


TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPTTOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT

THE TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT IS A VERY THE TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT IS A VERY POWERFUL AND SIMPLE CONCEPT TO POWERFUL AND SIMPLE CONCEPT TO UNDERSTAND :UNDERSTAND :

UTILIZE ENERGY IN A HIGHLY EFFICIENT UTILIZE ENERGY IN A HIGHLY EFFICIENT MANNER AND RECOVER ALL OF THE WASTE MANNER AND RECOVER ALL OF THE WASTE ENERGY IN A PRACTICAL AND ECONOMIC ENERGY IN A PRACTICAL AND ECONOMIC SCHEME.SCHEME.

AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLE WHICH AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLE WHICH DEMONSTRATES THE CONCEPT AND IT’S DEMONSTRATES THE CONCEPT AND IT’S POTENTIAL IS THE ELECTRIC GENERATING POTENTIAL IS THE ELECTRIC GENERATING INDUSTRYINDUSTRY


ENERGY LOSSES

FOR ELECTRIC GENERATING STATIONS

PRIMARY ENERGY

10, 675 BTU

CENTRAL POWER

PLANT

STACK LOSSES TRANSMISSION

LOSSES1 KW

ENERGY USED

RANKINE CYCLE (STEAM) GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY

BTU INPUT = 10.675 BTU

KW OUTPUT = 1 KW =3415 BTU

OVERALL EFFICIENCY = OUTPUT = 3415 = 32%

INPUT 10,675 BTU

32% IS THE U.S.A. NATIONAL AVERAGE OVERALL

AREAS OF ENERGY LOSS

BOILER LOSSES = 15 %

TRANSMISSION LOSSES = 5%

TURBINE CONDENSER LOSSES = 48%

TOTAL ENERGY LOSSES = 68%


BOILER

FUEL 100% INPUT

RANKINE CYCLE

STACK LOSSES 15% DEAERATOR

BFP

ELECTRICITY 32%

TRENSMISSION LOSSES 5%

CONDENSING STEAM TURBINE GENERATOR

CONDENSER

COOLING TOWER

CONDENSER LOSSES 48%


POWER POLICY As per Power Policy mentioned under 4.5 Renovation, As per Power Policy mentioned under 4.5 Renovation,

Modernization and Management of Existing Power Plants:Modernization and Management of Existing Power Plants:4.5.1 An important area which has not received sufficient 4.5.1 An important area which has not received sufficient attention is the upkeep of existing plants. Some of the power attention is the upkeep of existing plants. Some of the power stations in INDIA have outlived their original life span. In the stations in INDIA have outlived their original life span. In the absence of surplus generation capacities, due attention has not absence of surplus generation capacities, due attention has not been paid to scheduled maintenance, renovation and modernization been paid to scheduled maintenance, renovation and modernization of the existing plants. This has resulted in unplanned outages and of the existing plants. This has resulted in unplanned outages and frequent breakdowns. As a result, availability factor and the Plant frequent breakdowns. As a result, availability factor and the Plant Load Factor of a number of plants are below satisfactory level. It is Load Factor of a number of plants are below satisfactory level. It is proposed to increase the operating efficiency of the existing plants proposed to increase the operating efficiency of the existing plants through introduction of professional management and renovation through introduction of professional management and renovation and modernization programs. and modernization programs. The process of renovation and The process of renovation and modernization involves substantial investmentmodernization involves substantial investment.. The State proposes The State proposes to throw open the renovation and modernization of the existing to throw open the renovation and modernization of the existing plants to private sector (joint sector) participation which can help in plants to private sector (joint sector) participation which can help in bringing in more efficient management practices leading to greater bringing in more efficient management practices leading to greater availability of power. availability of power.


4.5.2 In this, the first task is to identify critical components in the 4.5.2 In this, the first task is to identify critical components in the plants that require immediate replacement and renovation. Such plants that require immediate replacement and renovation. Such renovation/extension programs can extend the life by another renovation/extension programs can extend the life by another 20-30 years at a fraction of the cost of a new plant. By 20-30 years at a fraction of the cost of a new plant. By improving the efficiency and utilization of the plant, the Plant improving the efficiency and utilization of the plant, the Plant Load Factor can be increased to 75%. Nearly 5000 million Load Factor can be increased to 75%. Nearly 5000 million additional units can be generated by this method alone in the additional units can be generated by this method alone in the State. Government will encourage the renovation and State. Government will encourage the renovation and modernization of all plants of State Electricity Board. For this modernization of all plants of State Electricity Board. For this purpose help of private sector will be taken on case-to-case and purpose help of private sector will be taken on case-to-case and merit basis. merit basis.

4.5.3 Private Sector will be allowed to operate/manage the plants 4.5.3 Private Sector will be allowed to operate/manage the plants wherever necessary. Such participation by the private sector wherever necessary. Such participation by the private sector may follow the following routes: may follow the following routes:

a) Lease, Rehabilitate, Operate and Transfer (LROT) a) Lease, Rehabilitate, Operate and Transfer (LROT) b) Joint Asset Management with State Electricity Boards;b) Joint Asset Management with State Electricity Boards;c) Sale of existing plants to private sector or to any joint sector c) Sale of existing plants to private sector or to any joint sector

venture. venture.


Patratu Thermal Power Station(Based on the Data submitted by JSEB to High Court –Jharkhand)

Installed Capacity - 10 UNITSInstalled Capacity - 10 UNITS 840 MW (1964)840 MW (1964)

(4 x 50 MW + 2 x 100 MW + 4 x 110 MW)(4 x 50 MW + 2 x 100 MW + 4 x 110 MW) Derated CapacityDerated Capacity 770 MW 770 MW

(4 x 40 MW + 2 x 90 MW + 2 x 105 MW + 2 x 110 MW)(4 x 40 MW + 2 x 90 MW + 2 x 105 MW + 2 x 110 MW) Generation AvailabilityGeneration Availability 150 – 200 MW (2006)150 – 200 MW (2006)

Unit no. 2, 6, 9 and 10 (Available for Generation)Unit no. 2, 6, 9 and 10 (Available for Generation)

Unit no. 2Unit no. 2 40 MW 40 MW

Unit no. 6Unit no. 6 Boiler 6(ii)Boiler 6(ii) 35/40MW - 70 MW 35/40MW - 70 MW

Capital Overhauling of Turbine Generator set has not been done since 1992Capital Overhauling of Turbine Generator set has not been done since 1992

Boiler 6(i)Boiler 6(i)

Out of Service since 2006 ESP Path of Boiler 6(i) is being connected with ESP Path B of Boiler 6(ii) –MECON Consulting Out of Service since 2006 ESP Path of Boiler 6(i) is being connected with ESP Path B of Boiler 6(ii) –MECON Consulting work to be completed by 2006 work to be completed by 2006

Consulting Fees:_____________________Consulting Fees:_____________________

Unit no. 9Unit no. 9 50-60 MW 50-60 MW

This unit has run for about 54,000 Hours after its last Capital Maintenance.This unit has run for about 54,000 Hours after its last Capital Maintenance.

Capital Overhauling Maintenance OVER DUE. COST__________________Capital Overhauling Maintenance OVER DUE. COST__________________

Unit no. 10Unit no. 10 80-90 MW 80-90 MW

AVAILABILITY OF UNITS 40+40+110+110 = 300 MW CapacityAVAILABILITY OF UNITS 40+40+110+110 = 300 MW Capacity

OPTIMUM GENERATION = 300 PRESENTOPTIMUM GENERATION = 300 PRESENT


Patratu Thermal Power Station (Based on the Data submitted by JSEB to High Court –Jharkhand)

Capital Overhauling of Turbine Generator set has not been done since 1992

Boiler 6(i) Out of Service since 2006 ESP Path of Boiler 6(i) is being connected with ESP Path B of Boiler 6(ii) –MECON Consulting work to be completed by 2006

Consulting Fees:_____________________

Unit no. 9 50-60 MWThis unit has run for about 54,000 Hours after its last Capital Maintenance.

Capital Overhauling Maintenance OVER DUE. COST__________________

Unit no. 10 80-90 MWAVAILABILITY OF UNITS 40+40+110+110 = 300 MW CapacityOPTIMUM GENERATION = 300 MW


In support of Power Policy, In support of Power Policy, EEL proposes a program on EEL proposes a program on

Retrofitting, Replacement, Retrofitting, Replacement, Optimization, Renovation, & Optimization, Renovation, &

ModernizationModernization (“Electroplating”) of Power Plant(s)(“Electroplating”) of Power Plant(s)

of of Jharkhand State Electricity BoardJharkhand State Electricity Board


RE-POWERING RE-POWERING &&

MODERNIZATIONMODERNIZATION

OF THEOF THEPATRATU THERMAL POWER STATIONSPATRATU THERMAL POWER STATIONS

(PTPS)(PTPS)IN IN

JHARKHAND , INDIAJHARKHAND , INDIA


OBJECTIVE““EVALUATE THE TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY EVALUATE THE TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY TO RETROFEIT, RENOVATE, REPLACE, REFURBISH AND TO RETROFEIT, RENOVATE, REPLACE, REFURBISH AND MODERNIZE MODERNIZE UNIT NO. 3,4 AND 5 OF OLD EXISTING RUSSIAN UNIT NO. 3,4 AND 5 OF OLD EXISTING RUSSIAN UNITS (PHASE 1) WITHOUT INTREPTING THE CURRENT UNITS (PHASE 1) WITHOUT INTREPTING THE CURRENT ELECTRIC GENERATIONELECTRIC GENERATION, BASED ON IDENTIFYING , BASED ON IDENTIFYING ALTERNATIVE MODIFICATIONS TO THESE PLANTS.” ALTERNATIVE MODIFICATIONS TO THESE PLANTS.”

THE MODIFICATIONS WILL RESULT IN:THE MODIFICATIONS WILL RESULT IN: IMPROVED PLFIMPROVED PLF IMPROVED THERMAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVED THERMAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVED NET PLANT HEAT RATEIMPROVED NET PLANT HEAT RATE IMPROVED UNIT RELIABILITY & AVAILABILITYIMPROVED UNIT RELIABILITY & AVAILABILITY IMPROVED PLANT ECONOMICS IMPROVED PLANT ECONOMICS REDUCED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSREDUCED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS INCREASE OUTPUT CAPACITY INCREASE OUTPUT CAPACITY


Eastern Energy Limited ’s Methodology for successful implementation of the R&M Program for the existing PTPS at Patratu in the State of Jharkhand will be as

follows :1. Pre-feasibility Study2. Feasibility Study3. Detail Project Report (DPR)4. Specifications for Equipment and System5. Preparation of the Tender Documents for

International Competitive Bidding (ICB)-(if required)

6. Finalization of the Tender Documents7. ICB - Evaluation & Selection8. Implementation and Supervision of R&M9. Completion & Evaluation


PRE-FEASIBILITY A Pre-feasibility study will be conducted for Patratu Thermal

Power Station (PTPS) for the R&M on a mutually agreed to schedule. The Pre-Feasibility studies for all of JSEB’s TPS will include the following:

Objective of Refurbishment / Modernization Executive summary Power plant background information Description of power plant major facility

components Identification of existing electric generating line

problems /evaluation / solutions Performance of refurbishment / modernization Benefits of refurbishment / modernization Cost implications (frequent outages, fuel etc.)

The results of the pre-feasibility studies for JSEB’s PTPS will determine the scope of work.


FEASIBILITY STUDY

THE FEASIBILITY STUDIES THE FEASIBILITY STUDIES FOR PATRATU THERMAL FOR PATRATU THERMAL POWER STATION WILL BE POWER STATION WILL BE CONDUCTED BY EASTERN CONDUCTED BY EASTERN

ENERGY LIMITEDENERGY LIMITED


DETAILSDETAILS11 DEVELOP PROJECT DESIGN BASIS

DOCUMENT (TECHNICAL & ECONOMIC)

WILL CONTAIN BASIS OF THE STUDY, ASSUMPTIONS, DATA UTILIZED, OBJECTIVE

ECONOMIC PARAMETERS.

THIS WILL INSURE THAT JSEB & EEL HAVE A DOCUMENTED UNDERSTANDING OF THE DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS UPON WHICH THE FEASIBILITY WILL BE PERFORMED.


THE FOLLOWING IS A PRELIMINARY SUMARY OF THE TWO TECHNOLOGIES BEING CONSIDERED FOR THE PATRATU

THERMAL POWER STATION (PTPS) REPLACEMENTS:

DescriptionDescription CFB Boiler CFB Boiler PC-Fired BoilerPC-Fired Boiler Comments Comments

Fuel SizeFuel Size Size6-12 mm x O Size6-12 mm x O >70%<70 microns >70%<70 microns Crushing Cost Higher in PC-Fired Crushing Cost Higher in PC-Fired Fuel Range Up to 75%Fuel Range Up to 75% Up to 60% Up to 60% PC-Fired has more limited range PC-Fired has more limited range (ash + moisture)(ash + moisture) Sulfur (1% - 6%) Limestone injection FGD plant requiredSulfur (1% - 6%) Limestone injection FGD plant required CFB has less expensive SO2 CFB has less expensive SO2

removal removal Aux. Fuel (Oil/Gas) Up to 20-30%Aux. Fuel (Oil/Gas) Up to 20-30% Up to 60%Up to 60% PC-Fired requires more oil/gas PC-Fired requires more oil/gas Aux. Power Consumption Slightly higherAux. Power Consumption Slightly higher LowerLower Unless FGD is needed; in which Unless FGD is needed; in which

case, PC case, PC is higher is higher

SO2SO2 <200 ppm <250 ppm with FGD <200 ppm <250 ppm with FGD CFB has lower SO2 emissions, less CFB has lower SO2 emissions, less expensive expensive

NOxNOx <100 ppm < 100 with SCR CFB doesn’t require SCR (or SNCR) <100 ppm < 100 with SCR CFB doesn’t require SCR (or SNCR) Boiler EfficiencyBoiler Efficiency Same Same No difference Same Same No difference O&M Cost 5-10% lower 5-10% higher CFB has less moving equipmentO&M Cost 5-10% lower 5-10% higher CFB has less moving equipment Capital Cost 5-10% higher 5-10% lower w/o FGD&SCRCapital Cost 5-10% higher 5-10% lower w/o FGD&SCR

8-13% lower 8-13% higher w/FGD&SCR8-13% lower 8-13% higher w/FGD&SCR w/FGD&SCRw/FGD&SCR

ONCE ALL OF THE PARAMETERS ARE KNOWN THE TECHNOLOGY WILL ONCE ALL OF THE PARAMETERS ARE KNOWN THE TECHNOLOGY WILL BE FINALIZED BETWEEN CFB BOILER AND PC-FIRED BOILER.BE FINALIZED BETWEEN CFB BOILER AND PC-FIRED BOILER.


22 DEVELOP PHYSICAL PLANT SITE DEVELOP PHYSICAL PLANT SITE ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT

THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR USE IN THE FIELD DURING THE PLANT WALK-USE IN THE FIELD DURING THE PLANT WALK-DOWNS, TO INSURE THAT CRITICAL DOWNS, TO INSURE THAT CRITICAL INFORMATION IS OBTAINED FOR ALL MAJOR INFORMATION IS OBTAINED FOR ALL MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS SUBJECT TO EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS SUBJECT TO REFURBISHMENT AND MODERNIZATION.REFURBISHMENT AND MODERNIZATION.


33 DEVELOP PLANT PERSONNEL DEVELOP PLANT PERSONNEL INTERVIEW FORMINTERVIEW FORM

THIS FORM WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR USE IN THIS FORM WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR USE IN OBTAINING INFORMATION FROM PLANT OBTAINING INFORMATION FROM PLANT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL REGARDING :REGARDING :

• ROUTINE OPERATIONAL PRACTICESROUTINE OPERATIONAL PRACTICES• OPERATIONAL, RELIABILITY, AND OPERATIONAL, RELIABILITY, AND

AVAILABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING AVAILABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMSMAJOR EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS

• REPAIR/MAINTENANCE/BREAKDOWN HISTORY REPAIR/MAINTENANCE/BREAKDOWN HISTORY OF MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMSOF MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS


44 DEVELOP PROJECT ECONOMIC DEVELOP PROJECT ECONOMIC PRO-FORMAPRO-FORMA

THIS PRO-FORMA WILL CONTAIN ALL THE THIS PRO-FORMA WILL CONTAIN ALL THE REQUIRED ECONOMIC PARAMETERS TO REQUIRED ECONOMIC PARAMETERS TO ILLUSTRATE THAT THE IMPLEMENTATION IS ILLUSTRATE THAT THE IMPLEMENTATION IS ECONOMICALLY VIABLE AND FINANCEABLE. ECONOMICALLY VIABLE AND FINANCEABLE. THIS PRO-FORMA WILL BE A GENERIC THIS PRO-FORMA WILL BE A GENERIC TEMPLATE TO BE REFINED DURING THE TEMPLATE TO BE REFINED DURING THE COURSE OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY.COURSE OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY.


55 CONDUCT ON-SITE PLANT WALK-DOWNS CONDUCT ON-SITE PLANT WALK-DOWNS

AND PERSONNEL, INTERVIEWSAND PERSONNEL, INTERVIEWS

THIS IS DONE TO PHYSICALLY INSPECT THE THIS IS DONE TO PHYSICALLY INSPECT THE CONDITION OF THE MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND CONDITION OF THE MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS, AND TO OBTAIN OPERATIONAL AND SYSTEMS, AND TO OBTAIN OPERATIONAL AND PROCEDURAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROCEDURAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE FACILITY. THESE PLANT WALK DOWNS WILL BE FACILITY. THESE PLANT WALK DOWNS WILL BE CONDUCTED USING THE PLANT ASSESSMENT CONDUCTED USING THE PLANT ASSESSMENT AND PERSONNEL INTERVIEW FORMS, WITH AND PERSONNEL INTERVIEW FORMS, WITH TECHNICAL PERSONNEL RESIDING IN INDIA.TECHNICAL PERSONNEL RESIDING IN INDIA.


66 IDENTIFY REASONABLY FEASIBLE IDENTIFY REASONABLY FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVE UNIT ALTERNATIVE UNIT MODIFICATIONS FOR EACH UNITMODIFICATIONS FOR EACH UNIT

DURING THIS PHASE OF THE FEASIBILITY DURING THIS PHASE OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY THE APPLICATION OF THE STATE OF STUDY THE APPLICATION OF THE STATE OF THE ART TECHNOLOGIES WILL BE THE ART TECHNOLOGIES WILL BE EVALUATED & CONSIDERED BY EXPERTS IN EVALUATED & CONSIDERED BY EXPERTS IN THE FIELD. THE FIELD.


77 IDENTIFY THE IMPACT TO MAJOR IDENTIFY THE IMPACT TO MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMSEQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS

THIS PART OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY IS THIS PART OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY IS VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE THE VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE THE MODIFICATION OF THE MAJOR SYSTEMS AND MODIFICATION OF THE MAJOR SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT CAN SIGNIFICANTLY EFFECT THE EQUIPMENT CAN SIGNIFICANTLY EFFECT THE OPERATION OF THE REMAINING PARTS OF OPERATION OF THE REMAINING PARTS OF THE ELECTRIC GENERATING LINE. THE END THE ELECTRIC GENERATING LINE. THE END RESULT IS THAT THE TOTAL SYSTEM HAS TO RESULT IS THAT THE TOTAL SYSTEM HAS TO BE IN BALANCE AND OPERATE IN A EFFICIENT BE IN BALANCE AND OPERATE IN A EFFICIENT AND ORDERLY MANNERAND ORDERLY MANNER


88 EVALUATE THE ALTERNATIVE EVALUATE THE ALTERNATIVE MODIFICATIONS TO IDENTIFY A SINGLE MODIFICATIONS TO IDENTIFY A SINGLE PREFERRED APPROACH FOR EACH UNIT, PREFERRED APPROACH FOR EACH UNIT, BASED ON TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC BASED ON TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONSCONSIDERATIONS

ALL OF THE ALTERNATIVES BEING ALL OF THE ALTERNATIVES BEING CONSIDERED UP TO THIS POINT WILL BE CONSIDERED UP TO THIS POINT WILL BE REVIEWED, AND A PREFERRED REVIEWED, AND A PREFERRED APPROACH WILL BE IDENTIFIED FOR APPROACH WILL BE IDENTIFIED FOR EACH OF THE PLANTS.EACH OF THE PLANTS.


99 DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT FOR EACH UNIT, BASED ON THE FOR EACH UNIT, BASED ON THE MODIFICATIONS IDENTIFIEDMODIFICATIONS IDENTIFIED

10 10 DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL INSTALLED INSTALLED PRESENT- DAY CAPITAL PRESENT- DAY CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE FOR EACH PREFERRED COST ESTIMATE FOR EACH PREFERRED APPROACH FOR EACH UNITAPPROACH FOR EACH UNIT

1111 DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL FIRST DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL FIRST YEAR ANNUAL OPERATING COST YEAR ANNUAL OPERATING COST ESTIMATION FOR EACH UNITESTIMATION FOR EACH UNIT


1212 GENERATE THE CONCEPTUAL GENERATE THE CONCEPTUAL

1313 PRO-FORMA FOR EACH UNIT MODIFICATION PRO-FORMA FOR EACH UNIT MODIFICATION SELECTEDSELECTED

THIS CONCEPTUAL PRO-FORMA WILL BE BASED THIS CONCEPTUAL PRO-FORMA WILL BE BASED ON THE GENERIC PRO-FORMA TEMPLATE ON THE GENERIC PRO-FORMA TEMPLATE DESCRIBED IN SLIDE #34. IT WILL INCLUDE THE DESCRIBED IN SLIDE #34. IT WILL INCLUDE THE CONCEPTUAL CAPITAL AND ANNUAL COST CONCEPTUAL CAPITAL AND ANNUAL COST DEVELOPED FOR EACH OF THE TWO DEVELOPED FOR EACH OF THE TWO PREFERRED APPROACHES SELECTED FOR PREFERRED APPROACHES SELECTED FOR IMPLEMENTATION.IMPLEMENTATION.

1414 GENERATE A SUMMARY REPORT PRESENTING GENERATE A SUMMARY REPORT PRESENTING THE ABOVE ACTIVITIESTHE ABOVE ACTIVITIES


ESTIMATED SCHEDULEIt is anticipated that the Feasibility Study can be completed according It is anticipated that the Feasibility Study can be completed according to the following overall milestone schedule to the following overall milestone schedule

Activity Activity Completion Weeks after Completion Weeks after JDA Execution JDA Execution

Develop Design Basis Document FormatDevelop Design Basis Document Format

for Submittal to JSEB/EEL JV Companyfor Submittal to JSEB/EEL JV Company 33

Develop Plant Walk-Down FormsDevelop Plant Walk-Down Forms

& Personnel Interview Forms& Personnel Interview Forms 33

Obtain existing technical parameters of the Obtain existing technical parameters of the

Processes and equipment from GPCL/GEBProcesses and equipment from GPCL/GEB 55

Commence Plant Walk-Downs and InterviewsCommence Plant Walk-Downs and Interviews 88

Identify Potential AlternativesIdentify Potential Alternatives 1414

Evaluate Alternatives and Select Evaluate Alternatives and Select 11

Preferred OptionPreferred Option1717

Provide Draft report of Effort to GPCL/GEBProvide Draft report of Effort to GPCL/GEB 2222

Obtain review comments from GPCL/GEBObtain review comments from GPCL/GEB 2525 Issue Issue

revised final report for Feasibility Studyrevised final report for Feasibility Study 28 28


DETAIL PROJECT REPORT (DPR)

Detail Project Report will include but not limited to the following:

1. Conceptual Design of Refurbishment and Modernization

• 1.1 Lay out• 1.2 Mechanical Systems• 1.3 Electrical Systems• 1.4 Instrumentation &

Control• 1.5 Civil & Structural• 1.6 Support Facilities• 1.7 Construction Facilities• 1.8 Environmental Aspects

2. Project Implementation & Schedule3. Organizational Set-up 4. Capital Cost Estimation and Financial

Analysis5. Drawings


Specifications for equipment and Systems

Detailed specifications and standards will be developed to meet all the required local, State and JSEB codes and standards to insure that a safe, efficient, reliable, cost effective and dependable R&M installation is achieved. The Specification schedule will be finalized once the Feasibility Study is completed.


Preparation of the Tender Documents for International Competitive Bidding

(ICB)(if required) The tender documents will be prepared jointly with JSEB to

insure that the most efficient, cost effective, reliable, dependable and expeditious R&M installation is accomplished.

Building on the data and information already developed and agreed upon, the tender documents will be developed. The tender documents will consist of instructions and information for bidders along with the actual EPC and O&M agreements (if required) that will be completed and executed between the parties. . The schedule for preparation of the Tender Documents will be finalized once the Feasibility Study, DPR and Specifications for Equipment & Systems are completed.


Finalization of the Tender Documents

Subject only to final negotiations, the tender documents developed to this point are intended to be complete, final, and mutually consistent. This is a final in-house step prior to final bidding and negotiations with the service providers. The necessary documents in conjunction with the additional technical and legal support will also be prepared

Among the most critical assumptions made in the financial proforma are the guarantees upon which the facility performance is based. Engineering, heat balance diagrams combined with the experienced estimates of the necessary margins, will indicate the levels at which the EPC contractors can be expected to bid the performance guarantees.


ICB - Evaluation & SELECTION Armed with the detailed financial analysis, assumptions and

anticipated performance data, the JSEB/EEL development team is equipped to intelligently finalize each of the agreements. Interfaces between the contracts are allocated per the responsibility matrix (developed by EEL) and terms are concluded only after comparison to the financial model. Deviations resulting during negotiations are examined for impact on the overall project and adjustments are made to all contracts affected by each deviation.

EEL will prepare the necessary documents and conduct all negotiations with the development guidelines that will be set in place. All negotiations will be conducted in conjunction with the additional technical and legal support required.

As the contracts are negotiated the financial proformas are updated and reviewed. This repetitive process yields a financial indication of the impact of current events throughout the development process. It also assures that a high degree of control is available.


Implementation and Supervision of R&M

The project implementation and supervision phases of the R&M process should be rather anticlimactic if the stage is set prior to its beginning. Still events may occur that result in added cost or time to complete the project. Additionally, the relationship with the community and agencies that form the external environment of the project will be established at this time. These relationships work best if kept on a positive basis. Management of public relations and news releases can set a positive tone for this and future projects under development. The key steps in this phase of the process are:

Active Implementation Plan Monitor Progress and Report Control Changes and Force Majuere Events Manage Political, Legal, and Media Aspects of Project


Completion & Evaluation Several months before completion of construction, members of

the JSEB/EEL construction team will commence planned pre-commissioning activities. Some of the activities are as follows:

Checking of equipment and systems for completeness and operability including safety and mechanical integrity.

System cleaning and any necessary pre-treatment Leak testing Electrical system check-out, including safety checks Instrumentation check-out, including loop checks Checking of machinery and drives, making ready for

operation. Other activities include arranging for vendor specialists to perform their activities at site in accordance with the R&M program requirements

Once the R&M work is completed the entire generating line will be tested to determine if it performs as per the specified performance warranties. At this time an evaluation will be made to determine if all the performance requirements are met and if so the electric generating line will be officially declared ready for Power Generation.


APPLICATION OF THE TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT FORREFURBISHMENT & MODERNIZATION

This concept will be applied to all aspects of the R&M. The main areas that this concept will be applied to but not limited to and how it will be applied will be as follows:

AREA HOW APPLIED Boilers Economizers, Air Pre-heater, Combustion Controls, Blown-Down

Energy Recovery, Automation, Metering of Fuel, etc.

Steam turbine Refurbishment or Replacement (as required) with high efficiency type.

Cooling System Optimize to obtain the best

possible cooling to maximize the output of the steam

turbine generator


Controls & Instrumentation.Install a control system (as required) to

minimize the energy utilized by the electric generating facility.

Recovery of the condenser waste heat which is normally dissipated to the atmosphere via a cooling tower. This is achieved by application of the state of the art technology in the form of HYDROPONIC FARMING and / or FISH FARMING. The application of these types of technologies can potentially raise the overall thermal efficiency of the power plant to above 75 %.

The above is a partial listing of the technologies that will possibly be utilized with the application of the TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT with the R&M, if all of the economic criteria are met. The recovery of the condenser heat load as stated above requires additional time and engineering and will be evaluated and if economically viable and practical will be implemented after the completion of the R&M.


JSEB’s ELECTRICAL ENERGY END USERS

(CUSTOMERS) The TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT can be applied to JSEB’s electrical

energy customers in the form of creating an ENERGY MANAGEMENT and CONSERVATION PROGRAM for JSEB’s customers. The primary reason for this is that energy management and energy conservation is the most economic form of generating electrical energy. That is if electrical energy consumption is reduced by energy conservation, the energy that was conserved can be sold to another one of JSEB’s customers. The average simple payback periods for typical energy conservation projects are usually less than two years. It is significantly less costly to increase your available electrical energy by implementing energy conservation projects which makes electrical energy available than it is to build additional electrical generating facilities. A rule of thumb which clearly illustrates the effectiveness of the TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT is that the average energy conservation project cost about $200.00 to $ 300.00/ KW to conserve the electrical energy and the cost to build additional electric generating capacity is about $ 800.00/KW.


FINANCE OPTIONSFINANCE OPTIONS B.O.O. (BUILD, OWN, OPERATE )B.O.O. (BUILD, OWN, OPERATE ) B.O.T. ( BUILD, OWN, TRANSFER)B.O.T. ( BUILD, OWN, TRANSFER) B.O.O.T. ( BUILD, OWN, OPERATE, B.O.O.T. ( BUILD, OWN, OPERATE,

TRANSFER )TRANSFER ) B.O.O.M. ( BUILD, OWN, OPERATE, B.O.O.M. ( BUILD, OWN, OPERATE,

MAINTAIN )MAINTAIN ) B.O.O.M.T. ( BUILD, OWN, OPERATE, B.O.O.M.T. ( BUILD, OWN, OPERATE,

MAINTAIN, TRANSFER )MAINTAIN, TRANSFER )


EEL can also follow the following routes as per the Power Policy

a) Lease, Rehabilitate, Operate and a) Lease, Rehabilitate, Operate and Transfer (LROT) Transfer (LROT)

b) Joint Asset Management with State b) Joint Asset Management with State Electricity BoardsElectricity Boards

c) Sale of existing plants to private sector c) Sale of existing plants to private sector or to any joint sector ventureor to any joint sector venture


SOURCES OF FINANCINGSOURCES OF FINANCING

MULTI-LATERAL LENDING AGENCIESMULTI-LATERAL LENDING AGENCIES– ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANKASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

– EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION & EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT

– INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANKINTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

– UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMUNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

– UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONUNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION

– WORLD BANKWORLD BANK

– INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATIONINTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION


SOURCES OF FINANCINGSOURCES OF FINANCING BI-LATERAL BANKING INSTITUTIONSBI-LATERAL BANKING INSTITUTIONS

– U. S. EXIM BANKU. S. EXIM BANK

– HERMES (Germany)HERMES (Germany)

– COFACE (France)COFACE (France)

– CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCYAGENCY

– EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (EDC) OF CANADA(EDC) OF CANADA


SOURCES OF FINANCINGSOURCES OF FINANCING

EQUITY PARTNERSEQUITY PARTNERS STOCK EXCHANGESSTOCK EXCHANGES COMMERCIAL DEBTCOMMERCIAL DEBT PRIVATE INVESTORSPRIVATE INVESTORS