tod in hubli-dharwad: possibilities and challenges in hubli-dharwad: possibilities and challenges...
TRANSCRIPT
TOD in Hubli-Dharwad: Possibilities and Challenges
Directorate of Urban Land Transport
�Twin cities
�Single municipal body w.e.f 1962.
�Distinct development:� Hubli: business and industrial hubof the region� Dharwad: educational centre:Karnataka University and Agriculturaluniversity.
Dharwad
�Population : 0.96 million in 2011,�Expected: 1.5 million by 2031.
�Rate of population growth- 1.69 % to 2%CAGR (low population growth in last twodecades1981-2011)
�Density: 4678 persons per sq.km.
Hubli
�Current developed area: 95.18 sq.km out of 202.3 sq.km corporation area.
� Developed area: 45 sq.km in 1986.
� 50 sq.km proposed to be developed in the next decade.
� Navanagar township formed in 1979.
TRANSIT SCENARIO:
� Average trip length, includingwalking : 5.1 km.
� Average trip length of motorised trips: 8.6 km
� PT carries ~ 2.5 lakh passengersevery day.
�Public Transport: LoS 2Organized PT exists; Service coverage and frequency need improvements.
� Pedestrian facilities: LoS 3Need considerable improvements.
� NMT: LoS 4�Between Hubli and Dharwad: 1.7lakhs.
�Expected demand by 2031: 12000pphdt. ~ 4 lakhs.
� NMT: LoS 4The city lacks adequate NMT facilities.
� Road safety: LoS 4Fatality rate per lakh population : 9.54.40% fatalities include pedestrians and cyclists.
Dharwad CBT
Karnataka University
NWKRTC terminal
PROPOSED BRT CORRIDOR: 22.25 Km.
FEEDER SERVICE: 19.7 km
Dedicated Corridor:21.35 KmMixed Traffic: 0.9 km
Hubli CBT
Hubli Rly Station
Airp
ort
TarihalIndustrial area
BRT Phase 1
Terminal
LEGE
ND
N Gopankoppa
Electricity Grid
FEEDER
BRTS- an opportunity to leverage a high-profile project to propel change.
�Master plan revision on the anvil.
�Improvement to last-mile connectivity to transit.
�Route rationalization/trunk-feeder integration.
�Concerned stakeholders on the board of directors of SPV.
Re-imagining Hubli-Dharwad.
�Preparation of master plan under technical assistance ofSUTP.
�EMBARQ study: SHAPING HUBLI-DHARWAD AS A“CONNECTED CITY“-Navanagar as a demonstration project.
NAVANAGAR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Dharwad
Navanagar
Navanagar Location of Navanagar / Study Area
Area- 200 haHubli
Navanagar
�Complete Streets�Cultural Landscapes�Public spaces�Compact Development�Transit Supportive Uses�Integrated Transport�TDM
Existing Road Network COMPLETE STREETS
�Incomplete road stretches.
�Inconsistent road widths.
�No interconnecting network.
�No clear distribution of road hierarchies in existing network.
�Large block sizes need to be broken into smaller sections
using NMT paths.
�No allocation of road space for NMT.
Proposed Complete Streets Proposed Road Hierarchies
3.m wide lane
6.m wide road (Local roads)
9.m wide road (Local roads)
12.m wide road (Neighbourhood Collector)
16.m wide road (Neighbourhood Collector)
18.m wide road (Collector)
24.m wide road (Collector)
30.m wide road (Collector)
44.m wide road (BRT)
A 12m wide neighborhood collector
A 16m wide neighborhood collector
Prohibited zone
Regulated zone
CULTURAL LANDSCAPES
1120 AD
According to the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains(Amendment and Validation) Act- 2010,
�Prohibited zone- 100m from the protected ASI monument. No constructions can bemade. The 100m area in Amargol about 50% of the old village.
�Regulated Zone- 200 m from the prohibited area. Constructions can be made withthe permission of GOI.
This implies that any construction/ modification/ development activities to becarried out in the entire village have to be approved by the ASI.
Guidelines for Historic Settlement of Amargol-
AMARGOL village
Current Issues-
�Predominantly agricultural.�The Station Road through the village connects the NH4 to theAmargol Railway station and many of the other villages beyond.
�Increased traffic and commercial activity
� Household activities including marriages spill out to thestreet and backyards.
� simultaneous rapid development and modernization atone end and severely limited change and growth at theother.
Master Plan, 2021-
�in the Master Plan: Commercial use along the main road(proposed at 24mts) and the interior roads (proposed at12mts).
� Existing road network or plotting within the extents of thevillage ignored: many structures will have to be demolishedto implement the Master Plan.
Proposed Public SpacesExisting Public Spaces
PUBLIC SPACES
Total Open Space- 11.1 ha(parks, natural lakes and a cemetery)
Current Issues-�A very small percentage of the Public Open spaces is usable by the public while the majority of the parks and green areas areneglected.�The strips of land around the lakes, which must be preserved as Riparian areas, are not protected, and hence any development inthis zone will threaten the lakes.�On street informal activities intrude into the pedestrians domain competing for space.
Current Issues-
�Only about 50 % of the plots have been builtupon. The government agencies have largeplots and hence the ratio of built to un-built ontheir properties is very low.
�Most buildings in Navanagar are ground and
COMPACT DEVELOPMENT & TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE USES
Master Plan, 2021-
�Master Plan- FSI is determined byLand Use and width of access road.
1.5 for residential plot on a 9 meteraccess road.2.5 for commercial plot on a 15 meter�Most buildings in Navanagar are ground and
ground plus one (G and G+1) structures.
�Underutilized FSI- Most of the roads are 9 mwide.
�Single commercial axis.
�Lack of mixed use in other areas.
2.5 for commercial plot on a 15 meterroad.
2min
5min
10min
TOD development zones
0 to 100 m zone: High density, highcommercial mixed use development
100 to 250 m zone: Medium density,balanced mixed use development
250 to 500 m zone: Low density, highresidential mixed use development
Identified zone for TOD development
Medium Density ZoneLow Density Zone
Proposed FSI map; EMBARQProposed FSI map; Master Plan 2021
Existing Land Use
High Density Zone
Public
Commercial
Open spaces
Water bodies
Residential
Proposed Land use map; Master Plan 2021 Proposed Land use map; EMBARQ
Create visually attractive building thatenhances the pedestrian environment
Existing typologies
Mixed use-Mid rise –High ground cover
ReferenceImages
• Facing Collector street ( x to y m)• Midrise ( G to g+2)( FSI 2-3)• Mixed-use ( commercial residential)• High ground cover ( 70 to 100%)• Peripherally located vertical access• Single units each floor• Front end open to street
Variations• Larger share of commercial use• Both peripheral and central vertical
access• Mixed use ( commercial –office)• Mixed use ( commercial –office)
Analysis• Good Density achieved (g:300-350,j:
200)• Good mix of land use ( 50-50 to 60-40)• Live edges achieved due to commercial
mix• Variations 1 & 2 achieve job densities of
400 +
Limitations• Light and ventilation is an issue• Ground coverage can be reduced by
modifying setbacks
• Reduce allowable ground coverto 50 %
• Front set back of 2m, Back setback of minimum 5m
• FSI: 2
• Segregated access for residentialand commercial
Navanagar Main road 100 ft. road as a ‘Green Way’
INTEGRATED TRANSPORT
100 ft. road as a ‘Green Way’
Public plaza at Navanagar Bus Stop
Scope for Improvements-
�Improving the feeder network.
�Integrating NMT, IPT facilities with BRT stops.
Existing route 1 (bus)
Proposed feeder routes – 20.1 km
Existing feeder routes
Bus Stop
Existing Bus stop
Feeder Network
BRT corridor
Existing route 2 (bus)
Existing Bus stop
TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT
Current issues
�Most of the private vehicles are parked on-street.(both designated and non-designated). No regulationof on-street parking.
�No special provisions made for parking of goodsvehicles, rickshaws and bicycles.
�No parking place for non-motorised transport.
�Paid parking is applicable at only one road of
Master Plan, 2021
�DCR mention the minimum parking requirement based on theusage type and road width.
�Specifies 1 /5 of the total parking area to be reserved for twowheelers and cycles.
�Cycle provision is optional as it is clubbed with twoWheelers
�Paid parking is applicable at only one road oflength 500m in entire city.
Scope for Improvements-
�Designate on street and off street parking areas.
�Maximum limit should be mentioned in the DCR instead of minimum parking requirements alongthe corridor.
�Parking pricing to be introduced for the twin cities.
Interventions Complete Streets
Integrated Transport
Public Space Cultural Landscapes
Compact Development
TransitSupportive Uses
Travel Demand Management
Project �Completion of DP roads�Design and implementation of NMT networks
�Provision of pedestrian paths between transit stations.�Design of public plazas.
�Design and provision of public space based on topographic features.�Design and implement safe and easy access.
�formulation of guidelines�OperationalizeHeritage cell to address special issues.
�Propose guidelines for special areas in TOD zone.�Develop framework for pedestrian responsive Built-form.
�Develop and implement Rational for mixed land use.�Integration of community facilities in neighborhood as part of TOD.
�Parking norms
Planning �Incorporating �Incorporation �Integrate �Identification of �Incorporate �Provision for �Develop Planning �Incorporating TOD, NMT, BRT in MP.�Formulation of Local Area plans for major TOD zones
�Incorporation of integration of multiple modes, pedestrian zones and pedestrian priority areas within MP.�Formulation of DCRs to support and enable pedestrian zones.
�Integrate public spaces and NMT network.�Legal provision for compensation of open spaces used for TOD development.
�Identification of special heritage areas and inclusion in the MP.�Construction incentives like density bonus, land assembly, remediation, transit integration etc.
�Incorporate new density zones and DCRs for TOD.�Incorporate regulations to encourage subdivisions.�Identification of special areas.�Introduction of Form-Based DCRs in MP.
�Provision for introducing mixed use as a Land use category.
�Develop provisions to support bicycles and pedestrian mobility through enabling strategies in DCRs of TOD zones identified in the MP.
Policy �Legal provision for heritage cell
�Streamlining development approvals/
Thank YouThank You