the use of competitive dialogue for major projects in the uk phd findings 19 october 2011 susie...

10
The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of Nottingham 7038881

Upload: jasmin-mathews

Post on 18-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of

The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UKPhD findings

19 October 2011

Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP

Richard Craven, University of Nottingham

7038881

Page 2: The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of

2

Setting the scene

• Aims of the PhD

• Approach used•Legal analysis•58 interviews (January 2010 – March 2011)

• 14 Procurement officers and in-house lawyers• 41 External legal advisors• 3 Policymakers

• Structure of the PhD – follows the planning and

procurement process

• Publication date

Page 3: The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of

Five areas of interest

• Choosing CD

• Confidentiality and the dialogue phase

• Phased dialogue and the use of award criteria

• How final are final tenders?

• Perceptions of risk of challenge and impact on decision

making

3

Page 4: The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of

Choosing CD

• Grounds for use of CD•Is this considered•Views on the conditions to be satisfied

• Is CD a standard procedure?

• Commoditised procurements

• Other factors influencing choice of CD or choice not to

use CD

4

Page 5: The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of

Confidentiality and the dialogue process

• High level of concern pre 2006 and general finding•Single solution or multiple solutions•Respect for confidential information• Amicable resolution of concerns

5

Page 6: The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of

Phased dialogue and the use of award criteria

• Reduction of solutions or bidders?

• Is a formal bidding process required?

• Same criteria for all stages or different criteria?•Particular issue with pricing at early stages

• Scope for variation of award criteria or weightings

during the CD process

• Uncertainty as to use of award criteria is a major

concern

6

Page 7: The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of

How final are final tenders?

• Theory and practice

7

Page 8: The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of

Perceptions of risk of challenge and impact on decision making

• Legal risk – central role in decision making

• Sources of challenge – Commission and the market

• Rise in bidder queries

• Impact on behaviour

8

Page 9: The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of

Next steps……

9

Page 10: The use of Competitive Dialogue for major projects in the UK PhD findings 19 October 2011 Susie Smith, Bevan Brittan LLP Richard Craven, University of

10

Contact details

Susie Smith 0870 194 [email protected]

Richard Craven

0741 250 5782

[email protected]

For BB procurement updates and alerts go to: www.bevanbrittan.com

For further information on the Public Procurement Research Group at the University of Nottingham go to: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pprg/index.aspx