the thermal expansion and mechanical properties of high reinforcement content sicp/al composites...

Upload: dhanashekar-manickam

Post on 09-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Qiang Zhang, Gaohui Wu, Guoqin Chen, Longtao Jiang, Bofeng Luan

TRANSCRIPT

  • The thermal expansion and mechanical properties of high reinforcement

    content SiCp/Al composites fabricated by squeeze casting technology

    Qiang Zhang*, Gaohui Wu, Guoqin Chen, Longtao Jiang, Bofeng Luan

    School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 92 West Dazhi Street, Harbin 150001, China

    Received 16 November 2002; revised 14 May 2003; accepted 10 July 2003

    Abstract

    With mixing different sized SiC particles, high reinforcement content SiCp/Al composites (Vp 50; 60 and 70%) for electronic packagingapplications were fabricated by squeeze casting technology. The composites were free of porosity and SiC particles distributed uniformly in

    the composite. The mean linear coefficients of thermal expansion (20100 8C) of SiCp/Al composites ranged from 8.3 to 10.8 1026/8C anddecreased with an increase in volume fraction of SiC content. The experimental coefficients of thermal expansion agreed well with predicted

    values based on Kerners model. The Brinell hardness increased from 188.6 to 258.0, and the modulus increased from 148 to 204 GPa for the

    corresponding composites. The bending strengths were larger than 370 MPa, but no obvious trend between bending strength and SiC content

    was observed.

    q 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: A. Metalmatrix composites; A. Particle-reinforcement; B. Coefficient of thermal expansion; B. Mechanical properties; Squeeze casting

    1. Introduction

    Particles reinforced aluminum matrix composites

    (PRAMCs) have received much recognition in electronic

    packaging and thermal management (such as power module

    base plates, printed wiring board cores, microprocessor lids,

    or electric enclosures), for their flexible fabrication

    techniques, tailorable thermo-physical properties and excel-

    lent specific mechanical properties [15]. Because tem-

    perature cycling often exists in the operating environment of

    electronic components, a reinforcement volume fraction of

    .60% is necessary [1,5,6] for coefficient of thermalexpansion (CTE) matching with those of electronic

    components or ceramic substrates to reduce thermally

    induced stresses and increase the reliability of electronic

    devices. The lifetime limitation of hybrid power modules

    can be improved more than 10 times by replacing copper

    with SiCp/Al baseplate [7].

    Composites with 5575 vol% particle reinforcements

    are produced by powder metallurgy [4,8] or pressureless

    infiltration process [9,10]. However, limitations of these two

    techniques include relatively higher cost, complicated

    processing steps, longer production cycles or specific

    protecting atmosphere. In contrast to them, squeeze casting

    technology is believed to be an effective technique because

    of the advantages of higher production rates, elimination of

    expensive equipments, feasibility of mass production and

    near-net products.

    Accordingly, the purposes of present work are two-fold:

    firstly, to produce high reinforcement content SiCp/Al

    composites by squeeze casting process and examine their

    microstructure; secondly, to investigate their thermal

    expansion and mechanical properties, then to further

    understand the feasibility of SiCp/Al composites for

    electronic packaging.

    2. Materials and experimental

    2.1. Materials preparation

    The fabrication of high reinforcement content composite

    is related to the packing fraction of particles. It is believed

    that the packing density of single size spheres is limited and

    0.74 is the largest theoretical packing fraction. But in fact, it

    is difficult to obtain such a higher packing. It was reported

    1359-835X/$ - see front matter q 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00253-7

    Composites: Part A 34 (2003) 10231027

    www.elsevier.com/locate/compositesa

    * Corresponding author. Tel.: 86-451-864-2164; fax: 86-451-864-3922.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (Q. Zhang).

  • that the packing fraction of random arrays of single size

    spheres varied from 0.59 to 0.64, depending on the packing

    conditions [11].

    However, an increased packing fraction can be obtained

    by mixing particles that have a proper particle size

    distribution, because fine particles can pack more efficiently

    around larger ones [1214]. Even a very high packing

    fraction more than 90% could be achieved by mixing the

    proper volume fraction of different particle sizes that

    differed by several orders of magnitude [14].

    On the basis of above analysis, three average particle

    sizes of 20, 40 and 60 mm were used in the present study and

    the particles were divided into three groups: (I) 20 mm SiC;

    (II) 20 and 40 mm SiC with a weight ratio of 3:2; (III) 20 and

    60 mm SiC with a weight ratio of 4:1. The composites of 50,

    60 and 70% were produced by group (I), (II) and (III),

    respectively. The aluminum matrix was an AlSi alloy

    (4032Al) whose nominal compositions were listed in

    Table 1. This alloy was chosen for the purpose of decreasing

    CTE efficiently and of avoiding interfacial reaction between

    aluminum and SiC. Table 2 summarized the properties of

    SiC particle and 4032Al.

    The SiCp/Al composites were fabricated by squeeze

    casting technology, as illustrated in Fig. 1. Firstly, the SiC

    particles with different sizes and weight ratios were mixed

    in distilled water by mechanical stirring for 2 h, and dried

    at 130 8C for 24 h. Then they were filled and pressed into

    a mold to produce a SiC preform according to the given

    volume fraction. After that, the preform was pre-heated in

    a tool steel die. At the same time, the aluminum alloy was

    melt, degassed, cleaned in a graphite crucible and heated

    to 750800 8C. When the preform was heated to 500

    600 8C, the molten aluminum was poured into the tool

    steel die and a vertical pressure up to 100 MPa was

    applied immediately to force molten aluminum to

    infiltrate into SiC preform completely. The pressure was

    maintained for about 5 min until the solidification was

    complete.

    2.2. Testing

    An S-570 scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used

    to examine the microstructure of as-fabricated SiCp/Al

    composites. Prior to the following tests, the composites

    were annealed at 410 8C for 3 h, and then furnace cooled.The CTE was measured on a DIL 402C Dilameter

    (NETZSCH Corp.) with a heating rate of 5 8C/min. And ahelium atmosphere with a flowing rate of 50 ml/min was

    used to keep the chamber temperature consistent. Based on

    the measured curves of relative length changes versus

    temperatures, the CTE was calculated between 20 and

    100 8C. To diminish systematic errors, the dilatometer wascalibrated by measuring an alumina sample under identical

    conditions.

    Brinell hardness (HB) tests were performed on a HBV-30

    double-purpose tester with a 1mm ball indenter. A load of

    30 kgf was applied and maintained for 30 s. Brinell

    hardness, instead of Vickers hardness measurement, was

    used because Vickers hardness would be affected by the

    reinforcements in an uncertain way depending on the

    reinforcement position under and around the indentation.

    Three-point bending tests with 30 mm span were carried out

    at room temperature on an Instron5569 universal electron

    tension testing system. The specimens were all 4 mm wide,

    3 mm thick and 36 mm in length. Fractography observations

    were carried out also on S-570 SEM.

    Table 1

    Chemical compositions of 4032Al (wt%)

    Si Cu Mg Fe Ni Zn Al

    4032Al 11.99 0.51.3 0.81.3 1.0 0.51.3 0.25 Bal.

    Table 2

    Properties of SiC particle [15] and 4032Al [16]

    Density

    (g/cm3)

    CTE

    ( 1026/8C)

    Youngs

    modulus

    (GPa)

    Shear

    modulus

    (GPa)

    Bulk

    modulus

    (GPa)

    Poissions

    ratio

    SiC 3.18 4.7 450 192 225 0.17

    4032Al 2.68 20.8a 69 29.7 77.5 0.33

    a By experiments.

    Fig. 1. Fabrication process of SiCp/Al composites.

    Q. Zhang et al. / Composites: Part A 34 (2003) 102310271024

  • 3. Results and discussion

    3.1. SEM microstructure examination

    Fig. 2 showed the SEM microstructure of as-fabricated

    SiCp/Al composites. It was found that larger SiC particles

    were necessary in larger volume fraction composites.

    Though different SiC particles were used in the different

    composites, SiC particles distributed uniformly in the

    composite and fine SiC particles occupied the interstitial

    positions around coarse particles efficiently. Three SiCp/Al

    composites were all dense and macroscopically homo-

    geneous, and seldom particles cluster was observed. A

    dense microstructure was beneficial to electronic packaging

    applications because of improvement in mechanical

    strength and heat conductivity.

    3.2. Thermal expansion analysis

    The measured CTEs of SiCp/Al composites were 8.3, 9.7

    and 10.8 1026/8C for the 70, 60 and 50% composites,respectively. The CTEs were reduced with an increase in

    volume fraction of SiC. In a SiCp/Al composite, the thermal

    expansion behavior is influenced by the thermal expansion

    of aluminum matrix and the tightened restriction of SiC

    particles. Since the restriction of SiC increased with the

    increasing of particles content, the CTEs of SiCp/Al

    composites were reduced. The CTEs were slightly higher

    than those of ceramic substrates, but the difference in CTE

    was favorable since it would make the substrates in

    compression when cooling from elevated temperature to

    ambient temperature during welding. The compressive

    forces could reduce the probability of component cracking.

    Several theoretical models were proposed to predict the

    CTE of particulate composite. If the matrix modulus is

    much smaller than that of reinforcement, the CTE of a

    composite is expressed as rule-of-mixture [17] (ROM):

    ac amVm apVp 1where a is the CTE, V is the volume fraction, and subscriptsc, m, p refer to the composite, matrix and particle,

    respectively.

    Turners model [18] considers the uniform hydrostatic

    stresses and gives the CTE of a composite as:

    ac amKmVm apKpVp

    KmVm KpVp 2

    where K is the bulk modulus.

    Both the normal and shear stress are taken into account in

    Kerners model [19], and the CTE of a composite is

    expressed as:

    ac amVm apVp VpVmap 2 am Kp 2 Km

    VmKm VpKp 3KpKm=4Gm 3

    where G is shear modulus.

    Fig. 3 shows the comparison between above theoretical

    predictions and experimental data. As could be seen,

    experimental data were in good agreement with the

    predicted values based on Kerners model, but deviated

    from ROM and Turners model. This may be attributed to

    the fact that normal and shear stress were included in

    Kerners model, and ROM or Turners model could not

    describe the complicated internal stresses inside a

    composite.

    Fig. 2. SEM micrographs of SiCp/Al composites. (a) 50% SiCp/Al composite, (b) 60% SiCp/Al composite, (c) 70% SiCp/Al composite.

    Fig. 3. Comparison between theoretical predictions and experimental

    CTEs.

    Q. Zhang et al. / Composites: Part A 34 (2003) 10231027 1025

  • 3.3. Mechanical properties

    The mechanical properties of SiCp/Al composites were

    shown in Table 3. As could be seen, the hardness of SiCp/

    Al composites increased with the increasing of SiC

    content. This could be ascribed to two factors. On one

    hand, the effective loading volume increased as the

    volume fraction of SiC increased. At the same time, SiC

    particles were larger in the higher Vp composites. This

    would enlarge the contact areas between indenter and

    particle, then help to improve the hardness of SiCp/Al

    composites.

    The bending strengths of SiCp/Al composites were larger

    than 370 MPa, with a maximum of 422 MPa. But no

    obvious trend between bending strength and SiC content

    was observed. It is believed that larger SiC particles in the

    higher Vp composites tend to fracture brittly because larger

    SiC particles had many larger defects and the bending stress

    of SiC was dominated by the largest flaw. Therefore, besides

    SiC content concerned, some other factors such as particle

    size and particle defects would influence the bending

    strength of the composite. Fig. 4 shows the bending

    fractographs of SiCp/Al composites. The matrix failed in

    a ductile manner, especially in the 50% SiCp/Al composite,

    as shown in Fig. 4 (b). The SiC particles fractured brittly,

    and some facets were found in the larger SiC particle,

    indicating that fracture propagated through the particles

    with shear mode.

    Table 3

    Mechanical properties of SiCp/Al composites

    Brinell hardness Bending strength (MPa) Modulus (GPa)

    Measured H-S model Measured/H-S model (%)

    50% SiCp/Al 188.8(6.0) 422.0(12.6) 148(10.1) 164.3 90.1

    60% SiCp/Al 208.7(5.5) 371.8(10.1) 165(7.3) 193.8 85.1

    70% SiCp/Al 258.0(7.2) 390.7(10.4) 204(8.9) 231.4 88.2

    Standard deviation was shown in parentheses.

    Fig. 4. SEM bending fractographs of SiCp/Al composites (a) 50% SiCp/Al composite. (b) High magnification image of the framed area in (a). (c) 60% SiCp/Al

    composite, (d) 70% SiCp/Al composite.

    Q. Zhang et al. / Composites: Part A 34 (2003) 102310271026

  • However, the moduli of SiCp/Al composites increased as

    the volume fraction of SiC increased. A Hashin-Shtrikman

    model [17] (H-S model) was used to predict the modulus of

    SiCp/Al composites. In this model, the modulus of a

    composite is expressed as:

    Ec EmEmVm EpVp 1EpVm EmVp 1 4

    where E is the modulus.

    The calculated data were also presented in Table 3. It

    could be found that the measured moduli were lower than

    the theoretical values, but reached their 85% of them,

    indicating that H-S model was valid for the prediction of

    composite modulus.

    The density of SiCp/Al composite was about

    3 103 kg/m3, resulting in a high specific modulus. Fig. 5illustrates the comparison of specific modulus among several

    conventional packaging materials [1,3,5]. As could be seen,

    the specific modulus of 70% SiCp/Al composite was more

    than 3 times higher than those of preferred packaging

    materialsKovar and Copper. A high specific modulus

    would diminish electronic components while maintaining its

    stiffness. Then the electronic devices could be made thinner

    and lighter. Additionally, in cold plate design, the thermal

    resistance was in inverse proportion to the thickness of plate

    [20]. Therefore, the decrease in thickness could reduce

    thermal resistance and enhance thermal diffusivity.

    4. Conclusions

    1. With mixing proper volume fractions of different particle

    sizes, 50, 60 and 70% SiCp/Al composites were

    fabricated by squeeze casting process, then the compo-

    sites were macroscopically dense and homogeneous.

    2. The linear CTEs of SiCp/Al composites ranged from 8.3

    to 10.8 1026/8C, depending on the volume fraction of

    SiC. The experimental CTEs were in good agreement

    with predicted values based on Kerners model.

    3. The Brinell hardness and modulus of SiCp/Al compo-

    sites increased with an increase in the volume fraction of

    SiC, and the bending strengths were larger than

    370 MPa, but no obvious trend between bending strength

    and SiC content was observed.

    References

    [1] Johnston C, Young R. Advanced thermal management materials. Int

    Newslett Microsyst MEMs 2000;2(1):1415.

    [2] Hills D. A metal matrix composite cools avionics. Electron Packaging

    Prod 1994;34(12):21.

    [3] Zweben C. High performance thermal management materials.

    Electron Cooling Mag 1999;5(3):3642.

    [4] Saraswati R, Polese FJ. Aluminum matrix composite heat sinks for

    microchips and microcircuits. In: Proceedings of 1998 International

    Symposium on Microelectronics, California, USA; 14 November

    1998. p. 6816.

    [5] Zweben C. Advances in composite materials for thermal management

    in electronic packaging. JOM 1998;50(6):4751.

    [6] Premkumar MK, Hunt WH, Sawtell RR. Aluminum composite

    materials for multichip modules. JOM 1992;(7):248.

    [7] Azzopardi S, Thebaud JM, Worigard E, Zardini C, Sable P. Al/SiC

    baseplate hybrid power modules: evaluation of the thermomechanical

    performances. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on

    Integrated Power Packaging, Chicago, Illinois, USA; 1820 Septem-

    ber, 1998. p. 748.

    [8] Hunt M. Progress in powder metal composites. SAMPLE J 1990;

    26(1):336.

    [9] Hemambar C, Rao BS, Jayaram V. AlSiC electronic packages with

    controlled thermal expansion coefficient by a new method of

    pressureless infiltration. Mater Manuf Processes 2001;16(6):77988.

    [10] Pech-Canul MI, Makhlouf MM. Processing of AlSiCp metal matrix

    composites by pressureless infiltration of SiCp preforms. J Mater

    Synth Process 2000;8(1):3553.

    [11] Cordovilia CG, Louis E, Narciso J. Pressure infiltration of packed

    ceramic particulates by liquid metals. Acta Mater 1999;47(18):

    446179.

    [12] Bhaskar VV, Fred FL. Effect of interparticle potentials and sedimen-

    tation on particle packing density of bimodal particle distribution during

    pressure filtration. J Am Ceram Soc 1991;74(11):16672.

    [13] Chen C-Y, Chao C-G. Effect of particle-size distribution on the

    properties of high-volume-fraction SiCpAl-based composites.

    Metall Mater Trans 2000;31A(9):23519.

    [14] Mcgeary KR. Mechanical packing of spherical particles. J Am Ceram

    Soc 1961;44(10):51322.

    [15] Lemieux S, Elomari S, Nemes JA, Dkibo MD. Thermal expansion of

    isotropic Duralcan metalmatrix composites. J Mater Sci 1998;34:

    43817.

    [16] Japan Institute of Light Metals, The microstructure and properties of

    aluminum alloys. Japan: Japan Institute of Light Metals; 1991. p.

    4489, in Japanese.

    [17] Geiger L, Jackson M. Low-expansion MMCs boost avionics. Adv

    Mater Process 1989;136(7):238.

    [18] Turner PS. Thermal expansion stresses in reinforced plastics. J Res

    Natl Bureau Standards 1946;37:239.

    [19] Kerner EH. The elastic and thermo-elastic properties of composite

    media. Proc Phys Soc 1956;69:808.

    [20] Howard WM. Cold plate heat sinking for PCBs. Electron Packaging

    Prod 1996;36(7):4651.

    Fig. 5. Specific moduli of conventional packaging materials and SiCp/Al

    composites.

    Q. Zhang et al. / Composites: Part A 34 (2003) 10231027 1027

    The thermal expansion and mechanical properties of high reinforcement content SiCp/Al composites fabricated by squeeze casting IntroductionMaterials and experimentalMaterials preparationTesting

    Results and discussionSEM microstructure examinationThermal expansion analysisMechanical properties

    ConclusionsReferences