the resistand project · §senior advisor at geowise oy, finland §coordinator of resistand project...

INCREASINGDISASTERRESILIENCEBYESTABLISHINGASUSTAINABLEPROCESSTOSUPPORTSTANDARDISATIONOFTECHNOLOGIESANDSERVICES

TheResiStandProjectIMPROVER/ERNCIP2nd JointOperatorsWorkshop

11-12May,2017,Ispra,Italy

P.WoitschGeowise,Finland

§ SeniorAdvisoratGeowiseOy,Finland

§ CoordinatorofResiStandproject

§ 40yearsofworkexperienceservingtheindustryinvariouspositionsinFinlandandabroad

§ SeveralEU-fundedandnationalprojectsinthesecuritydomain

§ ParticipationinEUandinternationalstandardisationsince2002

§ Physics,ComputerScience(UniversityofHelsinki)

TheSpeaker:PerttiWoitsch

§ ResiStandproject

§ Standardisationinanutshell

§ Projectobjectiveandapproach

§ Projectoutcomeandexpectedimpact

§ Enduserpointofview

§ Nextsteps

Contents


TheResiStandProject

§ Call: H2020SecureSocieties2015§ Topic/Type: DRS-6/CSA§ Fullname: Increasingdisasterresilienceby

establishingasustainableprocesstosupportstandardisationoftechnologiesandservices

§ Duration: 24months(May2106– April2018)§ Effort: 185,5personmonths§ Funding: 1,96million€§ Coordinator: GeowiseOy,Finland§ Partners: 14

TheProject

ThePartners


StandardisationinaNutshell

§ Inessence,astandardisanagreedwayofdoingsomething– itisallaboutreachingconsensus.

§ Itcouldbeaboutmakingaproduct,managingaprocess,deliveringaserviceorsupplyingmaterials– standardscancoverahugerangeofactivitiesundertakenbyorganizationsandusedbytheircustomers.

§ Standardsarethedistilledwisdomofpeoplewithexpertiseintheirsubjectmatterandwhoknowtheneedsoftheorganizationstheyrepresent– peoplesuchasmanufacturers,sellers,buyers,customers,tradeassociations,usersorregulators.

WhatisaStandard?

Source: BSI – What is a standard?

TypesofStandards

§ InternationalStandards

§ EuropeanStandards

§ NationalStandards

§ IndustryStandards

LevelsofStandardisation

CommitteesandWorkingGroups

StandardisationofDisasterResilience– Int’lLevel

More information: www.iso.org; www.iec.ch; www.itu.int

StandardisationofDisasterResilience– EuropeanLevel

More information: www.cen.eu; www.cenelec.eu; www.etsi.orgwww.resistand.eu - see deliverable D2.1 Overview of standardisation

§ VeryfewENstandardsdeveloped

§ MainlyISOENstandard

§ Inadequateparticipationofstakeholders

§ Noclearpathfromresearchprojectstostandards

§ Redundancyofworkbetweenlevelsofstandardisation

§ Coordinationofworkbetweencommittees

§ Slowprogressofworkinggroups

EUSecurityStandardisationLandscape– Issues


ProjectObjectiveandApproach

ProjectObjectives

ProjectStructure

TheStakeholderApproach– ResiStandCommunities

• European & International Standardisation committees and working groups

• Provide information on existing standards and forthcoming new work items

• Benefit from increased efficiency in standard development as well as from definition of standardisation needs and opportunities


• Organizations using standards in their work (first responders, law enforcement agencies, non-governmental organizations)

• Identify current and future standardisation needs based on their work experience

• Receive up-to-date information on existing and future standards

• Benefit through increased interoperability and compatibility between systems and services


• Industry, including SMEs and the research community (universities, RTOs)

• Provide understanding of the expectations, drivers and restraints of the community

• Identify potential new technologies, solutions, procedures and practices that can be used as basis for future standardisation

• Benefit from increased efficiency in product development and clear view on standards

ThePre-standardisationApproach


ProjectOutcomeandExpectedImpact

1. Aroadmap forfuturestandardisationactivities§ criticalevaluationofthepotentialofstandards§ identificationofgapsinthestandardisationfunnel§ prioritizationofstandardisationneeds§ standardisationroadmapforimproveddisasterresilience

2. Asustainableprocess toimprovefuturestandardisation§ mappingofdemandandsupply§ assessmentofstandardisation§ successfulapplicationofstandardisationdeliverables§ willbetestedduringtheprojectwithaworkitem§ exploitationstrategyandimplementationplan

TheOutcome

§ Betterassessmentoffeasibilityandimpactofstandardsandmatchingofend-userneedswithopportunities

§ EstablishmentofastandardisationroadmapatEuropean(CEN/CENELEC/ETSI)andinternational(ISO/IEC/ITU)levels,leadingtonewstandards

§ ImprovedcoordinationofactivitiesatEUandinternationallevelsandcross-fertilisationamongdifferentsectors

§ Improvedcontributiontodisasterresilienceofpopulations,crisisanddisaster management,civilprotectionandCBRNEsystems,toolsandservicesthroughnewstandards

TheImpact


End-UserNeeds

§ AnEnd-UserCommunity(E-UC)hasbeencreated§ surveys,workshops,analyses,reports

§ toidentifytheendusers’standardisationneeds

§ tounderstandtheendusers’viewofthestandardisationprocess

§ tounderstandthedriversandrestraintsaffectingtheendusers’participationinstandardisation

§ Enduserrelateddatahasbeencollectedandanalysed

§ AnAssessmentFrameworkhasbeendevelopedtoassessthefeasibilityandimpactofproposedstandards

§ SameactionsalsofortheSUCandSAGCommunities

What’sbeendoneduringthe1st year?

§ Invitationssenttopotentialmembers(partners’ownnetworks,EU-fundedprojects,othernetworkssuchasCoU,TIEMSetc.)

§ Atotalof83expertshaveregisteredasE-UCmembers

§ Representinggovernmentalorganisations(fire,search&rescue,police,healthcare,ministriesetc.)andNGOs

§ From17EUMSand4non-EUcountries

ResiStandEnd-UserCommunity(E-UC)

§ TheE-UCneedswereaddressedthrough§ WebQuestionnaire(35/188answers)

§ FourWorkshops(37participants)

§ DesktopResearch(EU-fundedprojects)

§ Atotalof210end-userstandardisationneedsidentified

End-UserNeeds

End-UserneedsaccordingtoThematicAreas

End-Userneedsaccordingtodisastermgmt phases

Examplesofenduserneeds1

Examplesofenduserneeds2


ResiStandAssessmentFramework

ResiStandAssessmentFramework(RAF)

ResiStandAssessmentFramework(RAF)

Intake

Trends

Impactend-users

Impactindustry/SME/research

Feasibility

Impact overview

RAF– ExampleFeasibility

Foundation Y/N/? ExplanationAllrelevantcategoriesofstakeholdersinvolvedindevelopingthestandard Yes

SufficientSDOsinvolvedindevelopingthestandard Yes

Clearscopeofthestandardamongallstakeholders Yes

Consensusontheoutput(whatshouldbeachieved) No

Respondingtheneedsinthedisasterresiliencedomain Yes

Awarenessamongallstakeholdersabout(quantified)benefits No

Governmental/Toplevelcommitment Yes

Durationofdevelopmentlessorequalthen1.5year Unknown

Costsofdevelopment Mediumlow: itispossibletostarttheprojectbutfundingisdesirablefordeliveringresultsinshorttime.medium: fundingisneededas(1)resultsmaynotbeobtainedwithoutfundingand/orwilltakesubstantiallylonger(e.g.arranginginter-laboratorytesting)and(2)thenumberofavailableexpertswillbelimited.high :Fundingisessentialaswithoutfundingtheprojectwillnotgothroughbecauseresultscannotbeobtained(e.g.financingofinter-laboratorytesting)ornumberofavailableexpertswillbetoolimited.

Developmentperspectives Y/N/? ExplanationCleartime-frame No

Sufficientfundingfordevelopment No

Availabilityofacriticalmassofexpertswithindevelopmentteam Yes

Develomentteamwellbalanced Yes

Backgroundsupportbypractitioners Yes

Backgroundsupportbyrelevantindustry/research No

Implementation/follow-upperspectives Y/N/? ExplanationFundingforimplementationreserved No

Promotionarrangementsinsupportofimplementationforeseen Yes

Measurestakentopreventhighcoststoadapttheproposedstandard No

Ethical,legalandsocialaspectscovered Yes

Drawbacksandconstraints Y/N/? ExplanationDrawbacksofpractitionerstackled? Yes

Drawbacksofindustryandresearchtackled? No

Otherdrawbackstackled? Yes

Butstillsomeadditionalpractitionorswouldbebeneficial.

Notyet.

TRIhasarrangedEurope-widesupportatnationallevels…

Tobedone.

DIN,NENandSFSare…

Allpartnerssignedapre-proposaltextthatsoundsverypromising

Stillsomeminordiscussions.

Itfullyrespondstotheneedexpressedby…intheirmanifest…(2016)

Howeversomeadditionalpractitionersfrom1or2othercountrieswouldbe…

TheResiStandEnd-UserCommunitysupportstheproposedstandard…

Negotiationsareon-going.

Nootherdrawbacksareforeseenbecause…

Notyet.

Quitesomelettersofintenthavebeensigned.

Planningprocessison-going.

…

…

Planningprocessison-going.

Notclearyet.

Sufficientpartnersarefamiliarwithstandardisationdevelopmentand…


BenefitsandChallengesofStandardstoEndUsers

Benefitsofstandardstoendusers

§ Improvedcompatibilityandinteroperability.

§ Improvedcollaborationwithotherstakeholders

§ Buildinginstitutionalresilienceandbestpractices

§ Bottomupinfluencethroughparticipation

§ Increasedefficiency,readinessandoperability

§ Speedupcrisismanagementprocess

§ Exploitationofresearchresultsasstandards

Benefitsdrivingstandardisation

§ Highstandardisationcosts

§ Lackofmandateandresources

§ Lackofunderstandingthebenefits

§ Longstandardisationprojects

§ Complexstandardisationprocedures

§ Standardslackinguser-friendliness

§ Competitioninsteadofcollaboration

§ ConflictbetweentheIndustryandEnd-Users

Challengesinstandardisation


NextSteps

§ Criticalevaluationofstandardsasatoolforimprovingdisasterresilience

§ Identificationofstandardisationgapsanddraftingofaroadmapforthenextyears

§ Developmentofasustainablepre-standardisationprocessandanimplementationplan

§ PlansforcontinuationoftheResiStandcommunitiesandtoolsaftertheprojecthasended(05/2017->)

Nextsteps

§ CommunicationwiththeE-UC

§ Surveys,events,newsletters

§ FurtherdevelopmentoftheE-UC

§ Invitationofnewmembers

§ Developmentofdiscussiongroupsetc.

§ StrategyfortimeafterResiStand

§ Findingapartytotakecareofthecommunity

FurtherdevelopmentoftheE-UC

§ Workshopon11September,2017inBrussels,2017(CoU)

§ ValidationofidentifiedStandardisationGaps

§ Discussiononthepotentialofstandards

§ Finalconferenceon22March,2018Berlin(DIN)

§ PresentationofStandardisationRoadmap

§ IntroductionoftheResiStandProcess

Nextevents

Questions&Answers

www.resistand.eu

the resistand project · §senior advisor at geowise oy, finland §coordinator of resistand project...

Documents