the process of science ideas problem formation goal or hypothesis design conduct/collect analysis...

24
THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE • Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis • Design • Conduct/Collect • Analysis • Interpretation • Report • FEEDBACK

Upload: clare-morrison

Post on 13-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE

• Ideas• Problem Formation• Goal or Hypothesis• Design• Conduct/Collect• Analysis• Interpretation• Report• FEEDBACK

Page 2: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

Psychological Phenomena that are:

• Private

• Sensitive

• Rare

• internal

Page 3: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

SELF-REPORT approaches…….SURVEYS

• What do we want to know

• Construction– Questions– responses

• Who do we want to know about -Administration– sampling

Page 4: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

Population vs. sampleSampling: representation vs bias

• Identification of target population?

• Approach and demeanor of researcher– Simple random sampling– Stratified random sampling– Proportionate sampling– Ecological sampling– Convenience sampling

Sample Size?

Page 5: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

Survey Administration

• Paper

• Interview

• Telephone

• Mail

• Computer

– Return rate issues?

Page 6: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

Final comments on Self-report studies

• ISSUES OF– Reactivity vs Control– Knowledge– Accuracy – Motivation

– Interpretation…relationship to behavior???

Page 7: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

Descriptive approaches: CORRELATION

• Relatedness of different measures

• Allows prediction

Page 8: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

Correlational studies may reveal interesting relationships between different variables

• E.G.

• Traffic Accidents and time of day?

• Age and Aggression

• Internet Dating and Personality factors

• Drug use and social attitudes

• Eye contact and “liking”

Page 9: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

But Correlation does not allow us to make causal conclusions

• Only interesting hypothesis

Page 10: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

The Limits of correlation: 3rd Variables

Let’s consider these ideas:

Does Nicotine cause addiction?

Does Nutra-sweet cause cancer?

Does Social romantic attraction cause/lead to social affiliation?

Page 11: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

• Correlations are Descriptive

• they do not control for 3rd Variables

• or Directionality

• Therefore Scientists refrain from making causal conclusions based on Correlation evidence.

Page 12: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

• The Aspartame Controversy• While questions about saccharin may persist, the safety of another artificial

sweetener, aspartame, is clear cut, say FDA officials. FDA calls aspartame, sold under trade names such as NutraSweet and Equal, one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency has ever approved. The agency says the more than 100 toxicological and clinical studies it has reviewed confirm that aspartame is safe for the general population.

• This message would not necessarily be apparent to consumers surfing the Internet, especially those who use Web-based search engines to find information about sugar substitutes or artificial sweeteners. Websites with screaming headlines and well-written text attempt to link aspartame consumption to systemic lupus, multiple sclerosis, vision problems, headaches, fatigue, and even Alzheimer's disease. One report distributed nationally over e-mail systems claims that aspartame-sweetened soft drinks delivered to military personnel during the Persian Gulf War may have prompted Gulf War syndrome.

• No way, says FDA, along with many other health organizations such as the American Medical Association. David Hattan, Ph.D., acting director of FDA's division of health effects evaluation, says there is no "credible evidence," to support, for example, a link between aspartame and multiple sclerosis or systemic lupus. Some Internet reports claim that patients suffering from both conditions went into remission after discontinuing aspartame use. "Both of these disorders are subject to spontaneous remissions and exacerbation," says Hattan. "So it is entirely possible that when patients stopped using aspartame they might also coincidentally have had remission of their symptoms."

• It is true, says Hattan, that aspartame ingestion results in the production of methanol, formaldehyde and formate--substances that could be considered toxic at high doses. But the levels formed are modest, and substances such as methanol are found in higher amounts in common food products such as citrus juices and tomatoes.

Page 13: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

So why use correlation rather than experimentation?

• Allows study of non-manipulatable variables– Gender, drug use, etc– May identify or discover new relationships– Suggests possible causal relationships

Page 14: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK
Page 15: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

WRTING LAB REPORTS

Page 16: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK
Page 17: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK
Page 18: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK
Page 19: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK
Page 20: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK
Page 21: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

Overview

• Writing Lab Reports• Descriptive Research

Approaches• Descriptive Stats• Research Ideas

Page 22: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

Overview

• The experimental approach

• Variables and terminiology

• Between vs Within Designs

• Issues in Experimental design

• Inferential Stats• Reliability and Validity• Experimental Control

Page 23: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK

Overview

• Factorial Designs• Single-subject

Designs

• Ethics

Page 24: THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE Ideas Problem Formation Goal or Hypothesis Design Conduct/Collect Analysis Interpretation Report FEEDBACK