the pompano canal story

31
Part VIII The Pompano Canal Story TMDL Monitoring & Assessment Report

Upload: 2014-florida-public-works-expo

Post on 29-May-2015

46 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Pompano Canal Story

Part VIII The Pompano Canal Story

TMDL Monitoring & Assessment Report

Page 2: The Pompano Canal Story

Once Upon A Time..There was a Canal

Within the City of

Pompano Beach, in the

County of Broward, with

FDOT District 4 Roadways

3,795 Acres of Urban Living

Page 3: The Pompano Canal Story

In the Land Of the Broward County NPDES MS4 Permit

30 Co-Permittees

50 page long Permit

TMDL Implementation = FDEP BMAP Section

Page 4: The Pompano Canal Story

Then One Day……

Page 5: The Pompano Canal Story

The Cycle 3 Permit Arrived

102 Pages

115 Requirements

SOPs, ERPs, and TMDLs, OH MY!!!

Page 6: The Pompano Canal Story

Part VIII 3 a, the Beginning

Broward County and Co-Permittees

• TMDL Prioritization Report •Two adopted TMDLs in Broward County

•EPA Fecal Coliform •FDEP Nutrient

•Co-permittees went through a joint ranking process •Pompano Canal TMDL selected as the Cycle 3 Priority TMDL

Page 7: The Pompano Canal Story

It’s No Longer Impaired for Nutrients!

FDEP Confirmed: – Delisting for next

assessment cycle based on the annual Chlorophyll-a averages

The TMDL load reductions have been met!

Hydrological conditions a significant contributor!

Page 8: The Pompano Canal Story

The Permit Requires!!

After the TMDL

Prioritization thou shall

move to Part VIII 3 b,

TMDL Monitoring and

Assessment Plan

– Seasonal Loading

– Outfall Ranking

– Storm Event Monitoring

Page 9: The Pompano Canal Story

Storm Event Monitoring!

Multiple Outfalls

Three Co-Permitees

FDEP Required

–Each Agency Monitor an outfall

–No shared monitoring on one single outfall

Page 10: The Pompano Canal Story

Part VIII, Section B

“It is the intent of this section….. to ensure that within watersheds that

discharge to a water body with an EPA-established or DEP-adopted TMDL.”

–Pollutant discharges for those parameters listed in the TMDL are

reduced to the MEP through the implementation of the permittee’s SWMP.

–Adequate progress toward achieving assigned wasteload allocations

(WLAs) will be demonstrated through the implementation of – Structural and nonstructural best management practices (BMPs) and

– Other program activities that are targeted at TMDL-related pollutants

Page 11: The Pompano Canal Story

A Consent Decree TMDL

WMM nutrient output didn’t calibrate well The data did have a relationship with between Stormwater Runoff and Annual Rainfall –Stormwater runoff measured as

flow at the G-57 Control Structure

–G-57 is Canal Discharge Point

Page 12: The Pompano Canal Story

But it Makes Sense!

The FDEP stated that the issues with the long-term data set (Station FLBROW110) necessitated a different TMDL approach because the long term data set:

–Failed to capture information from the area of the drainage

basin that is generating the Chla exceedances,

–Did not recognize its correlation to rain events,

–Failed to provide useable relations between nutrients and Chla.

Page 13: The Pompano Canal Story

It’s a Plane, it’s a Train, It’s a Regression Model

•Loading capacity of the canal was estimated using a single regression model.

•Only two of the four FDEP “Special” sampling sites were used in the regression analysis.

•The furthest most downstream sites along the Pompano Canal and C-1 Canal were chosen because of the better correlation of TN and TP to Chla.

Page 14: The Pompano Canal Story

THE TMDL

•Adopted May 2007 •Impaired for Chlorophyll-a •Co-Limited •WLA Percent Reduction

–15.8% TN –13.6% TP

•Pounds Per Year Reduction –2,174.76 TN – 144.88 TP

TMDL

Page 15: The Pompano Canal Story

Puff the Magic Dragon

Existing Concentration –0.76 mg/L TN

–0.059 mg/L TP

Allowable Concentration –0.640 mg/L TN

–0.051 mg/L TP

The language adopted into Chapter 62-304 F.A.C., requires reductions in the existing load to meet the allowable annual load of 11,590.98 pounds (lbs) of TN and 923.66 lbs of TP.

Page 16: The Pompano Canal Story

Meeting TMDL Load Reductions

Verified Period 1998

SWMP Implementation

Significant Redevelopment –Stormwater Retrofits

•Redevelopment Pollutant Load not higher than previous land use

•Runoff Coefficent not higher because of increased perviousness

Page 17: The Pompano Canal Story
Page 18: The Pompano Canal Story

SWMP Nutrient Reductions

Page 19: The Pompano Canal Story
Page 20: The Pompano Canal Story

Redevelopment Nutrient Reductions

Page 21: The Pompano Canal Story

Bean Counting for Compliance

Page 22: The Pompano Canal Story

This is What Compliance Looks Like?

Page 23: The Pompano Canal Story

The Hydrology Problem

Page 24: The Pompano Canal Story

Looks Like a Canal but it’s really a Linear Pond!

Nutrient Reductions Met

Chla Concentrations

Lowered

TN and TP Concentrations have not Decreased

Page 25: The Pompano Canal Story

Great the Gate is Fixed But it has to Operate

Page 26: The Pompano Canal Story

The Truth Shall Set You Free!

TMDL Load Reductions

Achieved –Structural

–Non-Structural

Ambient Water Quality

Not Impaired

Root Cause Impairment

not from MS4 Discharge

Page 27: The Pompano Canal Story

Everyone Loves a Happy Ending!!

Page 28: The Pompano Canal Story

Happily Ever After?

No, Way!

This is a

Regulatory

Program

Page 29: The Pompano Canal Story

The Delisting

Water Quality Influenced by Gate Operations SFWMD Gate Operation

–Inconsistent –One May be Open and the Other

closed –SFWMD Operational Schedules

not Water Quality Driven

Status: –On Track for Delisting for Chla

(Mostly) –Dissolved Oxygen Continues to

be a Problem

Page 30: The Pompano Canal Story

The Moral of the Story

Before Gate Repair After Gate Repair

Page 31: The Pompano Canal Story

Maria Loucraft City of Pompano Beach Utility Compliance & Efficiency Manager [email protected] Amy Tracy ETM Water Resources Specialist [email protected]

Questions & Contact Information