the perfect storm community service council of greater tulsa
TRANSCRIPT
The Perfect Storm
Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
The Perfect Storm
Key dimensions of change:
Demographic trends
Technology
Globalization and economic shifts
Resources and thinking for investing in new directions
Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
8 Sources of the Perfect Storm
Lack of mass employment with living wage for unskilled/low-skilled persons and linked to growing income inequality
Growing workforce shortage
Rapid aging of the population
Challenges to healthy lifestyles and access to quality health care
Continued growing immigration
Growing challenges to American culture
Changing environmental conditions
Uncertainty of future energy supply
Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
The Perfect Storm…Health Insecurities
Global & U.S. Demographics
and Related Factors
Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Health Insecurities Increase in Developing Countries
Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Infectious Diseases Continue to be Leading Causes of Death Globally
Tuberculosis
Malaria
Hepatitis
HIV/AIDS
Cholera
Diptheria
Dysentery
Heart Disease
Cancer
Diabetes
Tuberculosis
HIV/AIDS
Hepatitis B and C
Source: Central Intelligence Agency, Long Term Global Demographic Trends: Reshaping the Geopolitical Landscape, (July 2001).
Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
In Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries, 30 Percent of All Children Are Underweight
Source: C. Haub, 2007 World Population Data Sheet.
Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
HIV Prevalence Is Highest in Southern Africa
Source: C. Haub, 2007 World Population Data Sheet.
Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Health Insecurities Increase in the United States Driven By High Costs and Lack of Insurance
Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Health Care Expenditures in the U.S. Growing
How much does the US spend on health and how has it changed?
• US spends over $6,500 per person on health care each year.
• 16% of the US economy is devoted to health care. • Health care spending is consuming an increasing share
of economic activity over time and has exceeded economic growth in every recent decade
National Health Care Expenditures and their Percentage of the GDP 1960 to 2005
5Source:CentersforMedicareandMedicaidServices,OfficeoftheActuary,NationalHealthStatisticsGroup,athttp://www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/(seeHistorical;NHEsummaryincludingshareofGDP, CY1960-2005;filenhegdp05.zip).
US Health Care Expenditures Exceed Global Expenditures But Outcomes Do Not Match
How does US spending compare with other countries?• As of 2004, health spending in the US was about 90%
higher than in many other industrialized countries.
US Health Care Expenditures 2004 Greatest in the World with Rank of 32nd in Health Outcomes
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Health Data 2007, from the OECD Internet subscription database updated July 2007. Copyright OECD 2007 ,www.oecd.org/health/healthdata.
US Health Care Expenditures Vary by Age with 50% of Expenditures on 5% of the Population
How does health care spending vary by person?• As of 2004, a small share of people accounts for a
significant share of expenses. Almost half of all health care spending was used to treat just 5% of the population.
• Health care spending varies by factors such as age and sex. Adults aged 65 years and older have the highest health care spending, averaging $8,647 per person.
Health Care Spending is Greatest in the Top 5% of the Population
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation calculations using data from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), 2004.
Health Care Spending is Greatest in Hospitals and Physicians
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation calculations using data from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), 2004.
Relative Expenditures by Source of Care are Increasing for Private Health Insurances
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group, at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalHealthExpendData
Health Insecurities Increase in Oklahoma and Tulsa County
Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Minorities are More At-risk for Health Insecurities
• A higher percentage having no health insurance• Minorities make half as many physician visits for
preventive health• Minority men are employed in the most dangerous
occupations (mining, construction, etc.)• Men and boys are encouraged to more risky behaviors• Research on health responses to specific diseases and
interventions by race are underfunded
Health Care Rx: Access For All The President’s Initiative on Race 1998
Gender Differences in Life Expectancy Favor Women
• Life expectancy for men and women in 1920 was 1 year difference
• Life expectancy for men and women in 2003 is 6 years difference
• Men are more likely to die than women in all the top ten causes of death
• At birth, there are more males than females. By age 36, the trend turns to more females than males. At age 100, women outnumber men by 8 to 1
www.menshealthnetwork.org
Premature Death Greater in Racial and Ethnic Minorities
• The racial and ethnic minorities in Oklahoma are expected to reach 50% of the Oklahoma population by 2010-2015
• Infant mortality is higher in minority populations• Oklahoma exceeds the national average in age adjusted
death rate for heart disease, cancer and stroke with minority populations disproportionately represented
Source: Center for Vital Statistics, Oklahoma State Department of Health
Diminishing Population Increase Health Insecurities in Rural Areas
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupOklahoma, 1970 - 2030
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, & 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.
6.3
6.6
6.8
7.4
7.7
7.7
8.5
16.6
17.1
18.2
18.9
18.4
19.8
25.9
9.2
9.7
10.1
10
10.1
13.5
10.7
47.8
50.5
52.5
51.9
52.2
49.1
46.2
17.5
14.1
10.6
10.4
10.4
9
8.1
2030
2020
2010
2000
1990
1980
1970
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of population
0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+
1.9
1.4
1.2
.9
.6
Pro
ject
ions 2.5
2.1
6.3
6.6
6.8
6.8
7.2
7.7
7.7
16.8
17.3
17.6
19.1
19.4
20.5
25
9.6
9.6
10.4
10.3
10.2
13.3
11.8
47.7
49.9
51.3
50.6
49.6
46
43.9
16.9
14.4
11.9
11.6
12
11.3
10.8
2030
2020
2010
2000
1990
1980
1970
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of population
0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+
Demographics
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupTulsa County, 1970 - 2030
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, & 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.
6.3
6.6
6.8
7.4
7.7
7.7
8.5
16.6
17.1
18.2
18.9
18.4
19.8
25.9
9.2
9.7
10.1
10
10.1
13.5
10.7
47.8
50.5
52.5
51.9
52.2
49.1
46.2
17.5
14.1
10.6
10.4
10.4
9
8.1
2030
2020
2010
2000
1990
1980
1970
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of population
0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+
1.9
1.4
1.2
.9
.6
Pro
ject
ions 2.5
2.1
Demographics
Life Expectancy for Whites and Blacks, 1800 to 2000 in the U.S. Has Grown Equally Dramatically
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
18
00
18
10
18
20
18
30
18
40
18
50
18
60
18
70
18
80
18
90
19
00
19
10
19
20
19
30
19
40
19
50
19
60
19
70
19
80
19
90
20
00
0
20
40
60
80
Life Expectancy
White Black
Note: Data not available for Blacks from 1860 to 1890.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa (1/2004).
Top Risk Factors for Young Children Age 0-4
Low-income and poverty
Teen mother, especially those with more than one child
Absent father
Short spacing between births (less than 24 months)
Parent, especially the mother, without a high school education
Lack of positive emotional, physical and intellectual experiences
>
>
>
>
>
>
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa (1/2004).
Top Risk Factors for Young Children Age 0-4
Low-income and poverty
Teen mother, especially those with more than one child
Absent father
Short spacing between births (less than 24 months)
Parent, especially the mother, without a high school education
Lack of positive emotional, physical and intellectual experiences
>
>
>
>
>
>
Infant Mortality Rates for Whites and Blacks, 1800 to 2000 in the U.S. Have Decreased
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
18
00
18
10
18
20
18
30
18
40
18
50
18
60
18
70
18
80
18
90
19
00
19
10
19
20
19
30
19
40
19
50
19
60
19
70
19
80
19
90
20
00
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Infant Mortality Rate
White Black
Note: Data not available for Blacks from 1860 to 1890.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Tulsa County, 2006 Estimates
Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program, 2006.
77.8%
11.5%
5.2%
2.0%
3.5%
71.1%
14.9%
6.2%2.1%
5.7%
79.0%
10.9%
5.1%2.2%
2.9%87.9%
6.2%
3.4%0.9%1.6%
White Black American Indian Asian & Other 2 or more
Total Population Under age 20
Age 20-64 Age 65 & over
Population by Age and Race and Hispanic Origin
N=577,795
N=69,089N=342,652
N=166,054
Hispanic8.8%
Hispanic8.9%
Hispanic12.1%
Hispanic2.1%
Female-headed Families with Own ChildrenOklahoma, 1980, 1990, 2000 & Estimates for 2006
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1980 Census, 1990 Census, 2000 Census, 2006 American Community Survey.
1980 1990 2000 2006 est.0
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
125,000
Number of families
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%Proportion of all families w/ children
# w/ children <6 22,092 29,682 36,405 44,400
% w/ children <6 11.6% 16.2% 19.7% 23.6%
# w/ children <18 na 87,945 94,403 104,617
% w/ children <18 na 19.8% 21.7% 24.8%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & OlderOklahoma, Tulsa County, & Oklahoma County, 2006 Estimates
Source: US Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey.
Less thanhigh school
High schoolgraduate
Somecollege
Associate'sdegree
Bachelor'sdegree
Master'sdegree
Professionalschool degree
Doctoratedegree
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Percent of persons 25+
Oklahoma
Tulsa County
Oklahoma County
Less thanhigh school
High schoolgraduate
Somecollege
Associate'sdegree
Bachelor'sdegree
Master'sdegree
Professionalschool degree
Doctoratedegree
Oklahoma 15.7% 33.9% 21.7% 6.5% 14.9% 5.1% 1.4% 0.7%
Tulsa County 12.6% 28.6% 22.2% 7.1% 20.2% 6.1% 2.3% 1%
Oklahoma County 16.5% 27% 24.4% 5.1% 17.6% 6.4% 2.1% 0.9%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Health Insurance Status, by AgeOklahoma, 2005-2006
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation.
1,673,131 (48.2%)
141,341 (4.1%)459,315 (13.2%)
553,526 (15.9%)
644,292 (18.6%)
435,497 (50.5%)
312,416 (36.3%)
113,735 (13.2%)
1,240,462 (59.9%)
95,634 (4.6%)117,044 (5.6%)
93,994 (4.5%)
524,480 (25.3%)
3,337 (0.7%)29,855 (5.8%)
473,042 (92.3%) 6,077 (1.2%)
Employer Individual Medicaid Medicare/Other Public Uninsured
Total Population Under Age 19
Age 19-64 Age 65 & over
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Oklahoma's Rankings in Outcomes Associated with Poor Health, 1990 and 2007
According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Source: United Health Foundation.
#31
#27
#31
#24
#27
#47
#47
#48
#40
#50
#43
#43
Overall ranking
Poor mental health days
Poor physical health days
Infant mortality
Cardiovascular deaths
Cancer deaths
Premature death
1990 2007
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Oklahoma's Rankings in Risk Factors Associated with Poor Health, 1990 and 2007
According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Source: United Health Foundation.
#44
#23#31
#24#8
#32#21
#46
#41
#47#12
#44#24
#34#38
#24#42
#42#30
#25
#40#50
#45
Personal BehaviorsPrevalence of smoking
Prevalence of Binge Drinking
Prevalence of obesity
High school graduation
Community EnvironmentViolent crime
Occupational fatalities
Infectious disease
Children in poverty
Public & Health PoliciesLack of health insurance
Per capita public health spending
Immunization coverage
Clinical Care
Adequacy of prenatal care
Primary Care Physicians
Preventable Hospitalizations
1990 2007
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsOklahoma, Tulsa County, and Oklahoma County, 2006
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.
13.4%
40.9%
6.2%
22.7%
6.7%
1.6%
33.5%
19.5%
11%
11.8%
41.5%
7%
24.9%
6.5%
2%
33.4%
18.7%
11.5%
12.5%
46.1%
6.3%
27.2%
7.5%
1.8%
33.5%
19%
10.9%
Teen mother(age 15-19)
Unmarried mother
Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)
Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation
Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)
Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)
Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)
Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)
Premature(<37 weeks gest.)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Percent of Births
Oklahoma
Tulsa Co.
Oklahoma Co.
Oklahoma births: 54,010Tulsa County births: 9,733Oklahoma County births: 12,265
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Age-Adjusted Death Rates for the Leading Causes of DeathUnited States, 2004, Oklahoma, Tulsa County, and Oklahoma County, 2005
Source: National Center for Health Statistics, Health E-Stats; Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.
Heart disease
Cancer
Stroke
Chronic lowerrespiratory diseases
Accidents
Diabetes mettitus
Alzheimer's disease
Influenza & pneumonia
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Rate per 100,000 Persons
U.S.
Oklahoma
Tulsa County
Oklahoma County
Community Profile 2008and Perfect Storm Publications
are available on our website:
www.csctulsa.org
Prepared for the Tulsa Area United Way Community Investments ProcessBy the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
December, 2007