the optimal structural design of qsat fm (flight model) space system dynamics laboratory m2 takafumi...
TRANSCRIPT
THE OPTIMAL STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF QSAT FM (Flight Model)
Space System Dynamics Laboratory
M2 Takafumi ImazuFebruary 27, 2007
2007 Master thesis
2 / 20ContentsContents
BackgroundObjectiveMicro Satellites QSATRequirement for satelliteConfiguration of analysis modelStructural Design
– Structural Analysis– Structural Test
Conclusions QSAT (Qshu SATellite)
3 / 20BackgroundBackground
QSAT
Science InstrumentsScience Instruments plasma probe magnetometer
• Structure subsystem will be critical during launch by H-IIA rocket.
4 / 20ObjectiveObjective
Optimal Structural Design of QSAT
• Based on QTEX-PR, the structural analysis and test are estimated.
Random vibration test is performed on QTEX-PR.
QTEX-PR (Qshu university Tether satellite EXperiments Public Relation)
5 / 20Micro satellite QSATMicro satellite QSAT
QSAT (Polar Plasma Observation Satellite)
OrbitSizeMass
MissionTerm
Depend H-IIA rocket≦ 500 mm Cube
≦ 50 kg
1 year
6 / 20
Directionz axis
x or y axis
Frequency>100Hz> 50Hz
Table.Stiffness Requirement
Requirement for SatelliteRequirement for Satellite
• Satellite Maximum size : 500×500×450mm3
Fig.Satellite Maximum Size
7 / 20Requirement for SatelliteRequirement for Satellite
PressureTension
z axis x or y axis-6G5G ± 5G
± 5G
Table Staic Load Acceleration
z axisx or y axis
5~100Hz5~100Hz
Table Dynamic Load AccelerationDirection Frequency Acceleration
2.5Go-p
2.0Go-p
20~200Hz200~2000Hz
Table Random vibration LevelFrequency range Power Spectral Density
+3dB/oct0.032
7.8GrmsRoot-Mean-Square value
8 / 20Configuration of analysis modelConfiguration of analysis model
①
②
③
③ ③
③
④
④ ④
④
⑤
Analysis model
i) Local partii) Whole satellite
Analysis
TopBottom
SideInsideFrange
Place Material Size (mm) Mass (kg)①②③④⑤
CFRP honeycombCFRP honeycombCFRP laminationCFRP lamination
Al5052
480× 480× 10480× 480× 10479× 180× 1314× 180× 2φ 225× 52
0.550.500.560.770.94
Angle & BoltsBus system
Al5052
Whole mass
1.499.9014.71
Table Element of analysis model
9 / 20Structural AnalysisStructural Analysis
Estimation of local part on analysis model
• CFRP Lam’s Side panel in itself where a unit is attached
f =π2 ρ h
D 1a2 + 1
b2( )i) formula
ii) Nastran (Structural analysis software)
CFRP : (Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic)Lam Lamination⇒
Member Element characteristics Characteristics of figureModel 1Model 2
UnitUnit
MassSHELL & Solid
PointQuad, Tria & Hexa
Table Analysis model
10 / 20Structural AnalysisStructural Analysis
(i) Model 1 (ii) Model 2
• Local side panel analyzed with Nastran
Magnetic torquer
Mass model Surface & Solid model
Analysis model
11 / 20Structural AnalysisStructural Analysis
Results
Fig. Each plates estimatedLocal plate of frequency ≥ 100Hz
Frequency of each plate is estimated
in whole satellite structure.
Platemd_2
Model 1 Model 2formulaFrequency
86.52 Hz 88.28 Hz90.62 Hz
Table Result of Frequency
Requirement
Not enough
12 / 20Structural AnalysisStructural Analysis
CFRP lamination plate in whole satellite structure
(i) Mass model (ii) Surface & Solid modelFig. Analysis model
Member Element Characteristic
UnitSURFACE
SOLIDor Mass
Table Analysis model
13 / 20Structural AnalysisStructural Analysis
Fig . Analysis model
(i) Mass model (ii) Surface & Solid model
(i) Mass model (ii) Surface & Solid model
Fig . Analysis model
Results
The requirement for stiffness is satisfied.
md_2Mass model Surface & Solid modelPlate
125.55 Hz123.09 Hz
FrequencyTable Frequency (local part)
Direction
x or y axis
Mass model Surface & Solid model
69.97 Hz65.23 Hzz axis 146.97 Hz153.99 Hz
Table Frequency (whole)
14 / 20
Table Strength (Mass)
L type Angle
Material Maximum stress6.3
Al5052Top & bottom panel 195 MPaHoneycomb
Allowable stress MS
195 MPa26.71 MPa37.00 MPa 4.3
L type Angle
Material Maximum stress6.4
Al5052Top & bottom panel 195 MPaHoneycomb
Allowable stress MS
195 MPa26.40 MPa66.06 MPa 2.0
Table Strength (Surface & Solid)
Structural AnalysisStructural Analysis
Static load analysisF : allowable stressS.F : margin of safety ratioσmax : stress of analysis
Requirement for H-IIA rocket is satisfied
MS: Margin of safety
MS =F
S.F×σ max- 1
15 / 20
Table Strength analysis
L type Angle
Material Maximum stress4.4
Al5052
Allowable stress MS
195 MPa37.03 MPa36.42 MPa
4.3①②①:Mass model②:Surface & Solid model
Structural AnalysisStructural Analysis
Sine vibration analysis
The satellite structure has no problem in analysis.
z axis
frequency range acceleration
5~100Hz 2.5G× 1.5
Table Requirement
16 / 20Structural testStructural test
Sine vibration test
When frequency is set 177.9Hz, sine vibration test is done with acceleration 0.1, 0.2 and 0.5G.
0.1
0.12
0.08
Acc
eler
atio
n(G
)
170.0 180.0 190.0Frequency (Hz)
177.9Hz 180.2Hz
Fig. frequency of satellite
Table Sweep test
Frequency range
Acceleration
Sweep velocity
100~300Hz
0.1G
4.0 octave/min
17 / 20Structural testStructural test
The analysis’s value is different from the test’s value.
The damping value with Nastran will be related
Comparing analysis with test
Unit
BatteryAttitude control
Camera 1
Top plate
2.5× 1.5GAnalysis
0.1G 0.2G 0.5GTest
1.100.970.37
1.76
0.64 0.91 1.411.00 1.00 1.081.36 1.56 1.89
5.46 3.30 4.15
Direction
YXZ
Z
Table Acceleration ratio
18 / 20
1e-7
1.0
1e-6
1e-5
1e-4
1e-3
0.01
0.1
20.0 100.0 1000.0
Pow
erS
pect
rum
Den
sity
(m/s
2 )/H
z
Frequency (Hz)Fig. result of random test
Structural testStructural test
Random test
19 / 20Structural testStructural test
Cause:Constraint for this panel is light.
rms (root mean square)
Unit
BatteryAttitude control
Camera 1
Top plate
Grms (base:0.078Grms)
0.4860.5461.544
2.618Sun sensor 1
Side plate
1.536
2.795
Direction
YX
ZZ
ZY
Table Acceleration ratio
20 / 20ConclusionsConclusions
Stiffness and strength of QTEX-PR have no problem in analysis.
It is difficult that each unit is attached in side panel of QTEX-PR.
About QSAT’s layout Some measure for side panel must be formulated
Power supplyUnit
TNC
Sun sensor
Sun sensor
Fig. QSAT’s layout (preliminary version)
21 / 20
Thank you very much Thank you very much for your kind attentionfor your kind attention
ご清聴ありがとうございました
22 / 20
AppendixAppendix
23 / 20Micro satellites being developed in Kyushu Micro satellites being developed in Kyushu universityuniversity
QTEX QTEX-PR
Mission RequirementDemonstration of tether deployment
Tether is 2km length
Demonstration of bus units
This size is a half QTEX’s sizeMission
Orbit Altitude : 800km, Sun synchronized orbit
Size
Mass
less than 500×500×500 mm3
less than 50 kg less than 25 kg
MissionTerm 3 months 3 months
24 / 20Requirement for satelliteRequirement for satellite
Mass
Gravity point offset
Moment of inertia
Product of inertia
less than 50 kg
x, y ≦ 25 mm
z ≦ 250 mm
≦ 1 kgm2
≒ 0 kgm2
Table Characteristics of satellite
25 / 20Structural design of QTEX-PRStructural design of QTEX-PR
Based on old QTEX-PR, QTEX-PR was renewed.• Change of L angle’s design• Boring CFRP plate
Fig. QTEX-PR configuration
Fig. L angle type
26 / 20Micro Satellite QSATMicro Satellite QSAT
1) To investigate plasma physics in the Earth’s aurora zone in order to better understand spacecraft charging
2) To conduct a comparison of FAC (Field-Aligned Current) observed in orbit with ground-based observation
Primary Objective
27 / 20Random vibration testRandom vibration test
Frequency of local part
Frequency of satellite
28 / 20Unit attached in satelliteUnit attached in satellite
Attitude controlGyro sensor
Electric power supplyBattery
Magnetic sensorCamera control
TNCCommunication instrument
MainCamera 1Camera 2
Sun sensor 1Sun sensor 2
Magnetic torquer 1Magnetic torquer 2Magnetic torquer 3
Boom
145,92,67145,92,67146,130,95146,92,68145,92,67145,92,67
141.5,92,110141.5,92,16145,92,67
40,60,4240,60,42
84,84,17284,84,172φ 10× 160φ 10× 160φ 10× 160
140,140,180
0.4100.4600.5000.9400.4100.4100.4500.3000.410
0.0300.030
0.9000.900
0.2500.250
0.250
3.000
(-82,-111.5,152)(12,-111.5,152)(111.5,10,152)(111.5,-85,152)(176,111.5,152)(-12,111.5,152)(-111.5,-10,152)
(-87,85,152)(-111.5,190,152)
(158,0,77)(0,158,77)
(197,-197,148)(-197,197,156)(-220,-200,152)
(-200,30,87)(-110,-200,87)
(0,0,123.5)
123456789
10111213141516
17
Unit Size (W,D,H mm) Mass (kg) Gravity Point (mm)
total mass 9.900 (kg)
29 / 20Unit attached in satelliteUnit attached in satellite
Fig. Equipment layout
30 / 20Sine wave vibrationSine wave vibration
31 / 20Random vibration testRandom vibration test