the future of faith session three faith turns into belief
Post on 22-Dec-2015
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
THE FUTURE OF FAITH
SESSION THREE
FAITH TURNS INTO BELIEF
USING THE THREE PART MODEL OF
FAITH – BELIEF – SPIRIT THAT COX
PRESENTS, WE DEAL WITH HOW THE
EARLY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
MOVED FROM LIVING ‘THE WAY’
OF JESUS TO A SYSTEM OF BELIEFS
‘ABOUT’ JESUS
Our Project:
An accurate picture of Christian origins
Clearer understanding of how we are
living in similar times to the early church
Three Characteristics of the Early Church:
Multifaceted
Apostolic authority a fiction
An “alternative” to empire
Three Modern Developments:
Discovery of the Gnostic Gospels (1945) - heresy and orthodoxy questioned
Apostolic Authority – a late invention
Emergence of “a people’s history”
Original Christianity was “anti-imperial”
and “counter-imperial” - Jesus example
As Christianity grew it became consumed
with issues of state
Modern liberationist and feminist theologies
have given us a whole new perspective of
formative Christianity.
- Polymorphic (not united)
- Disparate patterns of authority
- Defiant, not subservient to empire
Erection of hierarchies and the fabrication of belief systemswere imposed on the people
Clergy – shepherds or rulers?
Creeds –“Road markers of faith?” (or)“Imposed for salvation?”
What the church needs now are
“deeds” not “creeds”
- Rick Warren
Early Church:
A clash of loyalties – Caesar or Christ?
Later Church:
A clash of creeds – being “right” triumphs
Creedal statements were a response to:
External and internal threats to Christianity
Do good fences make good neighbors?
What are we walling in or walling out?
(Robert Frost – The Mending Wall)
The Result?
Belief “in Jesus” became beliefs “about him”
“People of the Way” became part of the
“Ecclesial imperium
The Rise of the Clerical Caste
Paul was not interested in uniformity
of belief or behavior – contextual advisor
Ignatius and Irenaeus sought episcopal
Control – uniformity of belief and practice
Case Study:
The Canonical Gospels versus
The Gnostic Gospels
John versus Thomas – Elaine Pagels
Characteristics of the “Jesus Wars”:
(Philip Jenkins)
Winners got to determine truth
Power was identified with orthodoxy
Survivor churches claimed authority
Standard teaching:
Apostolic successionApostolic authority
Christian community becomesCatholic Church
Bishops become rulers who ‘represent’ the people
The result?
Amalgamation of Church and Empire
Religion became political
State became religious
Small Group Discussion:
Why did it take so long for the “truth”
About early Christianity to come out?
Now that we know, so what?
SESSION FIVEHow We Might Move to the
Future
COX CHAPTER NINE
INTERFAITH DIALOGUE
“If you want to make peace,
You don’t talk to your friends,
You talk to your enemies.”
- Moshe Dayan Israeli general and
politician turned peacemaker
Secularization Affects All Faiths
Christianity and Other Faiths
Face a Common Moment of Crisis
We are “in this together”
OPTIONS
Martyrdom and Murder- Die for the Faith- Kill for the Faith
Dialogue- With Those Like Us- With Those Not Like Us
ENGAGING FUNDAMENTALISMS
Within Our Faith Family
Beyond Our Faith Family
“Fire From Heaven”
The Rise of Pentecostal Spirituality and
The Reshaping of Christianity in the
Twenty-First Century, by Harvey Cox
1995.
Cox Examples
Jerry Falwell - Liberty University
Pat Robertson – Regent University
“You just can’t talk to those people.”
“We not only can; we must and we did.”
INTRAFAITH DIALOGUE
Taking “Within” Our Faith Tradition
Commonalities:
Rediscovery of the Biblical Jesus
Emergence of a Post Western Christianity
INTERFAITH DIALOGUE
Talking “Beyond” Our Faith Tradition
Commonalities
Mystery
Justice
Best of Times – Worst of Times
Christian Conservatism is Changing
Can Christian Liberalism Change as Well?
Respect is Essential
SUMMARY
New Directions for the Future:
1. Toward “New Faiths”
2. Toward “Other Wings” of Christianity
3. Working Together for “Justice & Peace”
in a complex political world
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Talk and Action
1. Do you think we are too much “talk”
and not enough “action” - focused?
2. What possibilities exist for young people and not-so-young people today?
PENTECOSTALISM
A Major Sign of Hope for the Future of Faith
Pentecostalism
The fastest growing Christian Movement
of the past century, with every indication
of continuing that trend through the next
“Fire From Heaven”
The Rise of Pentecostal Spirituality and
The Reshaping of Christianity in the
Twenty-First Century
Harvey Cox (1995)
Pentecostalism, not Fundamentalism
At the heart of Christian growth in:
Brazil
Korea
Mainland China
USA (Latino population)
Fundamentalists, Pentecostals and Evangelicals
Fundamentalists:
Text-oriented literalists
Pentecostals:
Biblical authority + Direct H.S. experience
Fundamentalists:
“Sober and rational”
Pentecostals:
“Demonstrative worship; ecstatic praise”
Fundamentalists:Non-negotiable doctrines
Pentecostals:“Resistant” to doctrines, creeds, rituals
*****
Evangelicals tend to support Pentecostals and distance themselves from Fundamentalists
Distinguish:
American Pentecostals “Holiness Tradition”
from
Pentecostals in the Global South and East“Progressive Holiness”
Liberation Theology and Pentecostalism?
A possible future convergence in
Latin America between:
Base communities + Pentecostal (CEBs) Communities
(Catholic) (Protestant)
From Non-Conformityto “In, Not Of, the World”
List-making (organized)
Conscious Choice (individualism)
Decision (required)
Pentecostalism can provide creative soil for:
- democracy
- focus on politics and economics
Two Cautions
“Escapist” (Eschatological) thinking
“Health and Wealth” gospel
Questions for Groups
1. Discuss the pros and cons of
Pentecostalism (local and global)
2. Discuss possible collaboration between Mainline and Pentecostal Protestants