the bug, the drug and the mug dose: how much is enough? · betalactamin-induced central nervous...
TRANSCRIPT
The bug, the drug and the mugThe bug, the drug and the mugThe bug, the drug and the mugThe bug, the drug and the mug
Dose: How much is enough?
1
João Gonçalves Pereira
UCIP
Time
Conc
MIC
Dose: How much is enough?
Antibiotic Goals
• Promote bacteria death
• Prevent the emergence of resistance
• Avoid toxicity
Dose of Antibiotics
How much?
Antibiotic must not only attach to target but must occupy an
João G.P
ereira
• Avoid toxicity
Underdosing
Increase in Volume of distribution
Increase in clearance
adequate number of binding sites
That depends on drug concentration within the organism and also
on bacteria susceptibility – MIC
Usually antibiotic concentration must be over 3-5 times MIC
AminoglycosidesMetronidazol
AzithromycinFluoroquinolones
ConcentrationCmax
Area under the concentration curve
The magnitude required to clinical efficacy relates
Patterns of Antimicrobial Activity
João G.P
ereira
Fluoroquinolones
Beta-lactamsCarbapenemsGlycopeptides
Time (hours)T>MIC
MIC
The magnitude required to clinical efficacy relates with the number of molecules needed to kill bacteria (greater for Gram negative rods)
80
100
Time above MIC and eficcacy (animal model infected with S pneumoniae)
Penicillins
Cephalosporins
Patterns of Antimicrobial Activity
João G.P
ereiraCraig W - Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1996; 25. 213
40
60
T> MIC (%)
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
20
Fluoroquinolones
Clinical nad Microbiological Response (%)
80
100
Patterns of Antimicrobial ActivityClinical response (%)
80
100
6570
8389 92
Aminoglycosides
João G.P
ereira
Forrest Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37. 1073
Clinical nad Microbiological Response (%)
0-62.5 62.5-125125-250 250-500 >500
0
20
40
60
Clinical response (%)
Peak :MIC
0
20
40
60
2 4
55
65
6
70
8 10 12
24-Hr AUC/MIC
Moore J Infect Dis 1987;155. 93
Antibiotics in the critically ill
Increased
cardiac index
Leaky capillaries
and/or altered
protein binding
End organ dysfunction
(eg renal or hepatic)
Increased Increased volume
João G.P
ereira
Decreased
clearance
High serum
concentrations
Increased
clearance
Increased volume
of distribution
Low serum
concentrations
Roberts J – Clin Pharmacokinet 2006; 45; 755
Volume of Distribution (Vd)
••••••••
•••• ••••
Beta-Lactam
500 mg
Fluoroquinolone
500 mgVd (L)=Dose (mg)
Conc (mg/L)
João G.P
ereira
••••
••••
••••
••••
••••
•••• ••••
••••
••••
••••••••
••••
••••••••
••••••••
Vd 15-20 litersVd 80-200 liters
Sépsis
Concentration
Cmax Area under the curve
Pharmacokinetics / Pharmacodynamics
Increased Vd
João G.P
ereira
MIC
Concentration
Time (hours)
T>MIC
MIC
T>MIC
••••
••••
••••••••
••••
••••••••
••••••••
Increased Vd (5-10L)
15,00
20,00
25,00
30,00
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n
Median dose 7,4mg/Kg (n=32)
Pharmacokinetics / Pharmacodynamics
Increased Vd
João G.P
ereira
0,00
5,00
10,00
Time
11 patients maximum concentration less than 16 µg/mL
22 patients less than 20 µg/mL
No relationship with age, renal failure or sepsis severity
Gonçalves Pereira, Clin Microb Infect (e-pub ahead of print)
Pharmacokinetics and efficacy
1111
1,21,21,21,2
1,41,41,41,4
1,61,61,61,6
1,81,81,81,8
2222
VdVdVdVd
First day Vd of meropenem in critically ill patients
60 patients with febrile
Neutropenia
João G.P
ereira
0000
0,20,20,20,2
0,40,40,40,4
0,60,60,60,6
0,80,80,80,8
1111 2222 3333 4444 5555 6666 7777 8888
VdVdVdVd
Median 0,22 l/kg (0,16-1,85)
Data not published
Neutropenia
Meropenem Vd 0,22l/kg
Ariano, Ann Pharm 2005; 39. 3
42 responders – T>MIC 83%
18 failures – T>MIC 59%
0
5
10
15
20
Plasma Muscle Fat
Volunteers
Septic patients
Pharmacokinetics / Pharmacodynamics
Increased Vd
João G.P
ereira
� Piperacillin pharmacokinetics is different in septic shock patients:
� Decrease plasmatic and tissue AUC
� Increase volume of distribution
� Decrease of tissue concentration
Joukhadar - Crit Care Med 2001; 30. 1478
Insufficient concentration (always under MIC) in fat tissue
Piperacillin Tazobactam – Insufficient concentration in ELF of the lung of the critically ill patient (dose of 4,5 g 8-8 h)
Boselli E - Int Care Med 2004; 36. 1500
Continuous infusion of Beta-Lactams
Continuous infusion increase T>MIC either in plasma and tissue
in septic patents
Mean tissue concentration
João G.P
ereira
Piperacillin tazobactam simulated plasma and muscle
concentrations in septic patients
Dose 16g (bolus) or 12g (continuous infusion)
Mean tissue concentration at day 2:
0,8 µg/mL vs 5,2 µg/mL (p=0,45)
Time to plasma-tissue 50% concentration equilibrium – 173h
Roberts Crit Care Med, 2009, 37, 926
Sepsis
Concentration
Pharmacokinetics / Pharmacodynamics
Increased Clearance
Area under the curve
Cmax
João G.P
ereira
MIC
Concentration
Time (hours)
T>MIC
Renal hiperfiltration – 17,5% of patients, mean of 142 mL/min
Fuster-Lluch Anaesth Intensive Care 2008; 36. 674
150
200
250
Drug Clearance (mL/min)
Pharmacokinetics / Pharmacodynamics
Increased Clearance
João G.P
ereira
0
50
100
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Creatinine Clearance (mL/min)
Drug Clearance (mL/min)
Cefepime Cefpirome
Lipman Anesth Analg 2003; 97. 1149
Mean Levofloxacin concentrations:Critically ill patients vs controls
Concentration (mg/mL) ICU patients
Healthy volunteers65
78
João G.P
ereira
Rebuck Pharmacother 2002; 22. 1216
Concentration (mg/mL)
Time (Hours)2 4 6 8 10 12 14
012345
0 16 18 20 22 24
500 mg dose
Magnitude of PK/PD parameter of GemifloxacinS. pneumoniae wild type and mutant in thighs of neutropenic mice
Bacteria
Conc
AUC/MIC
Pharmacokinetics and Susceptibility
João G.P
ereira
BacteriaMIC
Susceptible 0.015
Gyrase, PAR C or E 0.03-2.0
Efflux 0.12-0.25
Craig & Andes ICAAC 2000; Craig NCCLS, 2003
Time
MIC
AUC/MIC
82.3
MIC 31.3
5.8MIC
Pathogen eradication of Levofloxacin against ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae 500 mg versus 750 mg
Levo MIC: 1.8 µg/mL
6
7
8
9
10
CFU/mL
Control
500 mg678
910 Levo MIC: 3.2 µg/mL
João G.P
ereira
Lister Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002; 44. 43
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 4 8 14 16 20 24 28 32Time (Hours)
Log10CFU/mL
500 mg
750 mg
01
234
56
0 4 8 14 16 20 24 28 32
Time (Hours)Cipro MIC: 4µg/mL Cipro MIC: 16µg/mL
Antibiotic Increased Normal Moderately impaired Severely impaired
Piperacillin/tazobatam 16/2 g q24h CI 4/0.5 g q6h 3/0.375 g q6h 2/0.25 g q6h
Cefotaxime 4 to 6 g q24h CI 2 g q6-8h 1 g q6-8h 2 g q4-6h
Ceftazidime 4 to 6 g q24h CI 2 g q8h 1 g q8-12h 0.5 to 1 g q24h
Cefepime 4 to 6 g q24h CI 2 g q8h 2 g q12h 1 g q24h
Imipenem 500 mg q4h 500 mg q6h 250 mg q6h 250 mg q12h
Meropenem 1 g q6h over 6 hours 500 mg q6h 250 mg q6h 250 mg q12h
Recommended dosing regimens
renally excreted antimicrobials
João G.P
ereira
Meropenem 1 g q6h over 6 hours 500 mg q6h 250 mg q6h 250 mg q12h
Ertapenem ND 1 g q24h 1 g q24h 500 mg q24h
Gentamycin 9 to 10 mg/kg q24h 7 mg/kg q24h 7 mg/kg q36-48h 7 mg/kg q48-96h
Tobramycin 9 to 10 mg/kg q24h 7 mg/kg q24h 7 mg/kg q36-48h 7 mg/kg q48-96h
Amikacin 20 mg/kg q24h 15 mg/kg q24h 15 mg/kg q36-48h 15 mg/kg q48-96h
Ciprofloxacin 600 mg q12h 400 mg q12h 400 mg q12h 400 mg q24h
Levofloxacin 500 mg q12h 750 mg q24h 500 mg q24h 500 mg q48h
Vancomycin 30 mg/kg q24h CI 500 mg q6h 500 mg q12h 500 mg q24-72h
Daptomycin ND 6 mg/kg q24h 6 mg/kg q24h 6 mg/kg q48h
Pea Crit Care 2009; 13. 214
Probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment in HAP
OPTAMA Monte Carlo Simulation
Microbiological data from 2007 MYSTIC program
Bacteria prevalence according to 2000 SENTRY Surveillance study
João G.P
ereiraKim Clin Therap 2009; 31. 2765
Bacteria prevalence according to 2000 SENTRY Surveillance study
Pharmacokinetic data from critically ill patients
Accumulation and Toxicity
Ceftriaxone 2 g/d
Accumulation in renal failure
Cr Cl >50 mL/min <50 mL/min
Day 1 19,5 µg/mL 46,5 µg/mL
µg/mL µg/mL
João G.P
ereira
Day7 38,5 µg/mL 125 µg/mL
Heinemeyer Int Care Med 1990; 16; 448
Betalactamin-induced central nervous side effects include
confusion, disturbances of behaviour, hallucinations, asterixis,
myoclonic jerks, and generalised convulsive or nonconvulsive
seizures. Those are probably underreported but may contribute to
morbidity and mortality.
Chatellier Int Care Med 2002; 28. 214
Concentration Cmax
Pharmacokinetics / Pharmacodynamics
Aminoglycosides
CmaxRenal failure
João G.P
ereira
Time (hours)
MIC
�Pharmacodynamic parameter of efficacy: Peak/MIC
�Toxicity (Renal accumulation): Trough concentration
••••••••
••••••••
Optimisation of minimum concentration/MIC ratio
Placebo
T>MIC=84%
T>MIC=100% & Cmin/MIC=6
T>MIC=100% & Cmin/MIC=10
0 1 2 3 4 5
12
8
4
0Time (days)
Log 10 cfu/m
L
10
8
Log 10 cfu/m
L
0 1 2 3 4 5
10
8
4
0
6
2
10
8
Time (days)
Log 10 cfu/m
LLo
g 10 cfu/m
L
João G.P
ereira
T>MIC=100% Cmin/MIC=1.7+ tobramycinT>MIC=100% & Cmin/MIC=1.7
0 1 2 3 4 5
4
0Time (days)
Log 10 cfu/m
L
0 5
10
8
4
0
Log 10 cfu/m
L
Time (days)
2 3 41
0 1 2 3 4 5
8
4
0
6
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
10
8
4
0
6
2
Time (days)
Time (days)
Log 10 cfu/m
LLo
g 10 cfu/m
L
Tam Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49. 4920
Wild type
Amp C mutant
Clinical Application of Pharmacodynamics
High, aggressive dosing should be routinely used for systemic infections� The more severe the infection, the higher the doses that should be used
� Consider patterns of antibiotic activity•Increase peak and AUC of concentration dependent drugs
(higher doses)
João G.P
ereira
(higher doses)•Increase time of exposure of time dependent drugs
(shorter intervals) Risk-versus-benefit considerations are important
–Potential for increased efficacy–Potential for prevention of resistance–Potential for increased toxicity (consider organ failure)
•Monitor MIC and antibiotic concentration(whenever possible)
The person who takes medicine must recover twice, once from the disease and
João G.P
ereira
recover twice, once from the disease and once from the medicine.
- William Osler, M.D.
Porto, 25 de Março de 2010