the big housing review
TRANSCRIPT
8/23/2019 The Big Housing Review
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-big-housing-review 1/6
ig housing review
www.straitstimes.com/archive/saturday/supplements/saturday-special-report/story/the-big-housing-review-20130413[4/18/2013 1:10:44 PM]
Saturday, 13 April 2013 Last updated at 1:03 pm Mobile E-paper Reader E-paper Hello, HC005 My Account L
Saturday Special ReportST Index3,288.92 2.518/04/2013 13:07
Singapore weather
28 °C - 34°C
E AWARD-WINNING WEBSITE: BEST IN ONLINE MEDIA (GOLD) - WAN-IFRA ASIA DIGITAL MEDIA AWARDS 2012
JOBS CARS PROPERTY CLAS
Published onApr 13, 2013
Purchase thisarticle for
republication
Buy SPHphotos
NATIONAL Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan is not one to dither. Now that
he has ticked off one goal of delinking the prices of new HDB flats from the heated
resale market, he is upping the ante on new targets in his sights.
After 18 months of stable Build-To-Order flat prices, Mr Khaw declared inParliament last month that he wanted new flats in non-mature estates to cost four
times the annual median salary of a buyer - down 30 per cent from the current 5.5
times.
This would return prices to what they were before the property bull run of the last
six years, he said.
But in an exclusive interview with The Straits Times on Thursday, the minister-in-
a-hurry picked up the pace even further.
BTO pricing will be brought down to four times annual median incomes "quite
soon", he says. "It's not something for the next century."
The big housing review ational Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan speaks to Rachel Chang and Daryl Chin about his plan to involvengaporeans in designing HDB policies for the future, and what this could mean for home owners and buyers' chief oncern - price.
Ne
Saturday Special Re
The big housing r eview
The changing face of HDB
Back to basics?
Better to tax than curb car loans
No bending 'chope-ing' rule for MP
Little red dot, with a big soul
Thatcher 'death parties' a blight onBritain's image
Why Maggie remains a hate figure Britain
As chants would have it, a sacred
mission for Putin
Briefly
Please 'Like' me
One woman who has chosen to leaback
It's hard work putting yourself, or otfirst
Loneliness won't kill but social isola just might
Shakespeare: Playwright and businmentor
The doctor will see you now... viavideoconference
Could you be happier?
This one's easy to swallow
When less is beautiful: Simply stripaway red tape
Sweet taste of defeat in sake even
The salty taste of lithium
Most Popular
ome Saturday Special Report Story
-- ST PHOTO: KEVIN LIM
0
0
0
The Conversation Parliament Global Perspectives My Tip-Off School Pocket Money Fund ChildAid Motoring Cars Jobs Property Classifieds Newsletter
Breaking News Premium Videos Citizen Journalism Communit ies Photos / Art Straits Times Index
Search StraitsTimes.com
8/23/2019 The Big Housing Review
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-big-housing-review 2/6
ig housing review
www.straitstimes.com/archive/saturday/supplements/saturday-special-report/story/the-big-housing-review-20130413[4/18/2013 1:10:44 PM]
Referring to the just-started latest round of the Our Singapore Conversation, which
will have housing policy as one of the discussion points, he says: "We only have
two months to discuss this thing, otherwise the topic becomes quite stale. And
then we come to a conclusion, so that our lives can move on, can go on to do
something else."
The cheaper flats would have to come with restrictions to differentiate them, so
that current flat owners would not see their values plummet overnight.
In 10 sessions over the next few months, Singaporeans will also be asked to
chime in on the path that the Housing Board should take in the coming decades.
Should flats be an appreciating asset or a public good? How can it meet the silver
tsunami of retiring baby boomers and the higher housing aspirations of younger
Singaporeans at the same time?
In his interview, Mr Khaw did not want to be drawn into discussing the pros and
cons of policy options, for fear of influencing the coming conversations.
They are "very open", he emphasises, with only three criteria: "practicality, viability
and acceptability".
The Straits Times asked observers and analysts which policy options would fit the
bill on tackling affordability and at what cost.
Shorter leases
SELLING a cheaper class of flat on a shorter lease such as 60 years, as opposed
to the current 99 years, would be the easiest way Mr Khaw can deliver on hispromises.
Any impact on the values of existing HDB flats will be minimal as buyers would be
paying 30 per cent less for a flat that is likely 30 per cent less valuable. The idea
has been mooted by MPs like Mr Gan Thiam Poh (Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC) and
Mr Zainudin Nordin (Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC) in the past few years, as a way to
make flats more affordable for low-income families.
But analysts view the move as failing to address the fundamental problem of an
overvalued and rising HDB market, and say that it kicks the affordability can down
the road.
It is also not a practical suggestion, say observers like R'ST Research director
Ong Kah Seng, because of the difficulty of reselling a short-lease flat.
Banks will be unwilling to give large loans for a flat with only 50 years or less on its
lease, thus limiting the amount that resale buyers are willing to pay.
Such flats, due to the ticking time bomb of their shorter leases, will appreciate less
quickly than the rest of the market, or perhaps even depreciate in value, he notes.
Mr Gan himself has had second thoughts since he first mentioned the idea in
Parliament last year.
Residents have overwhelmingly given him feedback that "having shorter leases
doesn't solve the fundamental issue, which is that the price of flats is too high", he
says.
After a while, as the 60-year flats rise with the market, "it's back to square one" in
affordability.
Longer occupation periods
ANOTHER easy option would be for the HDB to extend the number of years that a
buyer has to stay in his new flat before he can sell it. This, say observers, could
stop people from treating flats as asset classes to flip for profit - thus puncturing
the rising market.
The current minimum occupancy period (MOP) for flats is five years.
But observers believe that to "lock in" families to their flats for a period of 10 years,
for example, would be unreasonable. "Over such a long time horizon, a family's
income, affordability and lifestyle requirements might have changed notably," says
1. Back to basics?
2. It's hard work putting yourself, others, first
3. Little red dot, with a big soul
4. Loneliness won't kill but socialisolation just might
5. No bending 'chope-ing' rule for
6. The big housing review
7. The changing face of HDB
8. When less is beautiful: Simplystripping away red tape
9. Why Maggie remains a hate figBritain
10. Better to tax than curb car loan
8/23/2019 The Big Housing Review
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-big-housing-review 3/6
ig housing review
www.straitstimes.com/archive/saturday/supplements/saturday-special-report/story/the-big-housing-review-20130413[4/18/2013 1:10:44 PM]
R'ST's Mr Ong.
Chesterton Suntec International research head Colin Tan says that a longer MOP
could be suitable for centrally located flats in areas like Queenstown, where
families will likely want to stay put.
"But less desirable areas should not have too long a lock-in period, as you are
effectively forcing people to stay when they can upgrade."
Indeed, the suggestion has already drawn objections from the public.
Forum letter writer J ames Oh wrote last month that a longer MOP might inevitably
cause many young Singaporean couples buying their first flat to purchaseunnecessarily large units.
"This results in the economic deadweight loss of empty rooms, over-leveraging
and an even higher national level of housing debt," he said.
Selling back to HDB
BEFORE 1971, Housing Board flats could only be sold back to HDB at pre-
determined prices. There was no such thing as capital gains from public housing.
The astonishing bull run of the resale market since 2007 has led some to hanker
for the old days.
In a policy paper last year, the Singapore Democratic Party proposed a system of
two classes of flats: open-market ones, and non-open-market ones which are
substantially cheaper, but can only be sold back to HDB.
Some worry that creating this new class of flats could lead to the emergence of an
"underclass" of flat owners who lose out on the rise of the property market, said
Nanyang Technological University economist Walter Theseira.
This is because it would be the lower-income who would go for the non-open-
market flats to begin with.
"Public housing which has been regarded as a failure (elsewhere) often
concentrates poorer people who have little to gain from the system," he notes.
"One of the great achievements of public housing in Singapore is that people by
and large do not feel that living in it marks one out as a member of the
underclass."
But despite property appreciation's role in the Singapore dream, MP Gan ThiamPoh says that it is not inevitable that only lower-income families would go for such
flats.
"There are people, even young people, who want just a home to live in, rather
than the capital gains. They will choose this because they can use their money for
other pursuits, or not use up so much of their CPF," he notes.
Many experts believe that some form of control on capital gains from public
housing should be instituted.
International Property Advisor chief executive Ku Swee Yong says flats can be
sold back to the HDB at a price marked up by inflation and gross domestic product
growth during the period of ownership. The control comes from the fact that as the
gain is linked to inflation and GDP growth, whatever capital gains there are never
outpace economic growth.
Assistant Professor Theseira believes that new flats should be allowed to be
resold on the open market only if the HDB owner pays a "top-up fee" - the size of
the discount he got for the new flat. This would allow HDB to "claw back" some of
its subsidies when flat sellers come into capital gains. "For people who intend
never to move, then the top-up fee is just irrelevant for them and they can enjoy
their discounted flat for a long time."
Housing vouchers
SOME argue that new flat prices should be brought down by 30 per cent only for
lower-income buyers. Why should a couple commanding close to the income
ceiling of $10,000 have the same access to cheaper flats as those earning half
8/23/2019 The Big Housing Review
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-big-housing-review 4/6
ig housing review
www.straitstimes.com/archive/saturday/supplements/saturday-special-report/story/the-big-housing-review-20130413[4/18/2013 1:10:44 PM]
that amount?
A housing voucher could be given to certain buyers to effectively waive 30 per
cent of a new flat's price, while the rest continue to pay the standard price.
The HDB already follows this principle in its housing grants, notes Mr Khaw. A
first-time buyer earning $1,500 a month or less gets an Additional CPF Housing
Grant of $40,000, compared to $5,000 for a buyer earning $5,000. "As an
approach, I think there is general acceptance," he says.
Pointing to the failure of the British National Health Service - where the financial
burden to the government has ballooned under its public come-one, come-all
approach - he says it would be a mistake to "treat rich and poor alike".
"If everybody gets the same subsidy, then that subsidy may be too much for the
rich and yet may, because of the heavy (fiscal) burden, end up not being enough
for the poor."
But the creeping nature of the grants system is a perennial issue, he notes. "We
start off looking after just the poor, the bottom 20, 30 per cent. But over the years,
the middle-income are crying out, you have a parent living in a nursing home, it's
not cheap. So we've been stretching this subsidy tier to cover the middle-income,
which I think is correct and fair. But of course, there's a limit. It cannot be stretched
forever." This would be writ large in a housing voucher system, says Chesterton's
Mr Tan: "How do you placate those who just miss out on the housing vouchers?
It's a political problem: Where to cut off?"
This suggestion, notes SLP International research head Nicholas Mak, also
provides the dangerous lure of a "windfall" for buyers when they sell their flats on
the resale market; the voucher must come with conditions, he emphasises.
Land costs
THAT the Housing Board pays market rate for the land it builds flats on has long
been a bugbear in some quarters.
State land belongs to Singaporeans, goes the argument, and should not be
included in the pricing of flats.
Removing or tweaking land costs in the flat price equation is one of the most
popular suggestions.
Omitting land costs could cut prices by half, says Institute of Policy Studies
researcher Tan Meng Wah.
The HDB could then reclaim the land value from the capital gains of the sale of a
flat on the resale market in order to recoup any losses, he argues.
For example, a buyer going for a $410,500 four-room HDB flat could pay about
$163,350 in interest for a 30- year HDB loan. Under the proposed model, the
buyer need only take a 15- year loan and pay only $38,655 in interest, saving
almost $125,000.
Opposition parties have also long advocated for exclusion of land from the
Housing Board's costing.
Since the proceeds from land sales go into the national reserves, removing landcosts would have limited immediate fiscal impact, proponents argue.
But Mr Khaw disputes this, noting that the value of a piece of land is also largely
contingent on its infrastructure.
Land in Tampines for instance, is pricey and popular as the Government has sunk
in billions of dollars into MRT lines, roads and other amenities. "Mature estates are
mature because of the many years of infrastructure building. So it's not an
imaginary cost, but real costs and taxpayers' money that is being put into a piece
of land."
Since there is a definite cost to construction and land, the key question to him,
then, is necessarily a question of how much in subsidy - made up of taxpayers'
8/23/2019 The Big Housing Review
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-big-housing-review 5/6
ig housing review
www.straitstimes.com/archive/saturday/supplements/saturday-special-report/story/the-big-housing-review-20130413[4/18/2013 1:10:44 PM]
NEXT STORY: The changing face of HDB
money - to dish out.
Moving ahead
WHATEVER emerges from the housing conversations of the next few months, Mr
Khaw says that he will, as usual, move with alacrity.
Asked why he is determined to shake up the public housing landscape now after
50 years of unchanging Housing Board philosophy, he says: "HDB is the statutory
board, they have to follow the prevailing rules. I'm in politics. I'm minister. I change
rules. My job is to decide when to change policies.
"Otherwise, why should I be here in this job?"
BACKGROUND STORY
HDB THE PRICE-SETTER
Our public housing is a dominant player. If we are led by the private sector, (it is
like) a tail wagging the dog. We should be the price-setter.
– Mr Khaw, on del inking prices of new Bui ld -To -Order flats from resale
ones
AFFORDABLE BTO PRICES
For a long time, our Build-To-Order prices were about four years. There wasn’t
an issue about affordability. The rapid rise in the bubble in recent years has
pushed it up now beyond five – which I take as unsustainable. (Four years) is
quite a reasonable target to shoot towards.
– Mr Khaw, on pr ic ing new flats in non-mature estates at f our times of
applicants’ annual salary
OPEN TO SUGGESTIONS
I'm reluctant, even before we start Our Singapore Conversation, to begin to
prescribe what is my preference. I'm looking forward to sensible, practical,
viable, acceptable solutions coming out. And (if) they are, I will do it.
– Mr Khaw, on how his minist ry is likely to bring pr ices down
Like
Like You like this.Sign Up to see what your friends like.
comments powered by DISQUS
Grant for R&D
Grant for Research & DevelopmentResearch Grant for All Industries.
www.siird.com/R&D-Grants
8/23/2019 The Big Housing Review
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-big-housing-review 6/6
ig housing review
C HI VE
M T W T F S
08 09 10 11 12 13
15 16 17 18 19 20
LLOW ST
A RCH THE STRA ITS T IMES S T S ECTIONS
Breaking News: •Singapore •SE Asia •Asia •World •Money •Sports • Technology •Lifestyle •Photo galleries
Premium: • Top of The News •Singapore •Asia •World •Money •Sports •Life! •Insight •Opinion •Forum
Letters
Communities: •Blogs •Forum Letters •Polls
Photos / Art: • Through The Lens •News in Pictures •Infographics
Features:
Projects: •Childaid •School Pocket Money Fund •Parliament
NEWS PRODUCTS
•E-paper •iPhone •Android •News Alert
CU STOMER CARE
•Subscribe •About Us •Advertise•FAQ •Mobile app FAQ •Contact Us
The Business Times | BT Inv
RazorTV
STOMP
J obs | Property | Cars | Clas
School Pocket Money Fund
Asia News Network
AsiaOne
Zaobao
Hot FM 91.3
SPH WEBSITES
yright © 2013 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn No. 198402868E. All rights reserved. Terms & C