texas higher education coordinating board webinar april 9, 2014 outcomes-based formula funding for...
TRANSCRIPT
TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD
WEBINARAPRIL 9 , 2014
Outcomes-Based Formula Funding for Universities
3
GAIFAC Recommendation – Funding Totals
$235 million in outcomes-based funding pool
OBF pool is equal to 10% of undergraduate formula funding, but:
Is outside of and in addition to the I&O formula
Fund I&O and Infrastructure at requested amounts first Series1
$0M
$500M
$1,000M
$1,500M
$2,000M
$2,500M
$3,000M
$3,500M
$4,000M
$4,500M
$5,000M
E&G Support; $734M
I&O - Graduate; $1,569M
I&O-Under-graduate,
$2,346
OBF - 5.1% More Funding Equal to
10% of Under-graduate I&O;
$235M
Total; 4884OBF
4
GAIFAC Recommendation– Success Metrics
Total Undergraduate Degrees
• Total number of Bachelor’s Degrees awarded by an institution in a given year.
Total Undergraduate Degrees by Graduation
Rate
• Total Bachelor’s Degrees multiplied by the school’s six-year graduation rate, to incent timely completion.
Total Undergraduate Degrees per 100 FTSE
• Degrees divided by Full Time Student Equivalents (FTSEs) and multiplied by 100. This aggregate measure adjusts for part-time and transfer students, providing a common framework for comparing degree productivity .
At-Risk Undergraduate Degrees
• Degrees awarded to students who meet federal criteria for being at high risk for non-completion.
Retention Metrics
• Points awarded for students who complete their 30th, 60th, or 90th hour at the institution, to incentivize the use of effective persistence policies.
5
GAIFAC Recommendation – Allocation
Allocate Funds based on: Points earned on the 7
success metrics The average of the three
most recent years of data
Points scaled statewide Points weighted by
institutions Phased-in over three
biennia
6
GAIFAC Recommendation- Allocation
Allocation based on each institution’s percent of statewide total points
Points are based on an average of the three most recent years of performance data
Institution Total PointsPercent of
Total PointsFunding (millions)
A 100 25 $58.75
B 125 31 $72.85
C 175 44 $103.4
Total 400 100 $235
9
GAIFAC Recommendation- Point Scales
Scaling adjusts each metrics’ points to ensure comparability and significance in the model
Factor
Three-Year
Average
Percent of Total Scale
Scaled Points
(A)Percent of Total
Total Undergraduate Degrees
5,800
23.0% 1 5,800
7.2%
By Graduation Rate
3,000 11.9% 7
21,000 26.2%
Per 100 FTSE
32 0.1% 25
800 1.0%
At-Risk Degrees
3,500 13.9% 7
24,500 30.5%
Retention to 30
7,000 27.7% 1.5
10,500 13.1%
Retention to 60
4,000 15.9% 2.5
10,000 12.5%
Retention to 90
1,900 7.5% 4
7,600 9.5%
Total
25,232 100.0%
80,200 100.0%
10
GAIFAC Recommendation - Weights
Each institution decides how to weight its metrics from a predetermined set of options
Each option is used once
Each institution’s weights must total 100 percent
Omit 1 metric – a weight of 0%
Remain in place for 3 biennia
100% 25%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5% 0%
Value
Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Option
Weight Factor
5%Total Undergraduate Degrees
25% By Graduation Rate
0% Per 100 FTSE
25% At-Risk Degrees
20% Retention to 30
15% Retention to 60
10% Retention to 90
100% Total
11
Factor
Scaled Points
(A)
Percent of Total
Weight(B)
Scaled and
Weighted Points(A*B)
Percent of Total
Total Undergraduate Degrees
5,800 7.2% 5% 290 1.8%
By Graduation Rate 21,000 26.2% 25% 5,250 32.8%
Per 100 FTSE 800 1.0% 0% 0 0.0%At-Risk Degrees 24,500 30.5% 25% 6,125 38.2%Retention to 30 10,500 13.1% 20% 2,100 13.1%Retention to 60 10,000 12.5% 15% 1,500 9.4%Retention to 90 7,600 9.5% 10% 760 4.7%Total 80,200 100.0% 100% 16,025 100.0%
GAIFAC Recommendation - Weights
Example Institution
13
GAIFAC Recommendation – Phase-in
The difference between an institution’s percent of statewide OBF funding and percent of statewide undergraduate I&O funding can vary no more than 0.5 percent for FY16-17 and 1 percent for FY18-19.
A2.50%
B14.50%
C19.75%
D28.25%
E35.00%
Outcomes-Based Funding (OBF) Percent Funded
A5.00%
B15.00%
C20.00%
D25.00%
E35.00%
Undergraduate Instruction and Operations (UGIO)
Formula Percent Funded
14
GAIFAC Recommendation– Phase-in
A Set-Aside, 2% A, 2.50%
B, 14.50%
C, 19.75%
D, 28.25%
E, 35.00%OBF 98%
15
GAIFAC Recommendation – Point Distribution: Statewide
Total Undergraduate Degrees1.6%
by Graduation Rate30.6%
per 100 FTSE0.5%At-Risk
34.4%
Retention to 30 Hours7.5%
Retention to 60 Hours12.8%
Retention to 90 Hours12.5%
16
GAIFAC Example Point Distribution: Regional Institution
Total Undergraduate Degrees
3.5%by Gradu-ation Rate
15.5%
per 100 FTSE27.9%
At-Risk42.9%
Retention to 30 Hours9.2%
Retention to 60 Hours1.1%
Statewide
17
GAIFAC Example Point Distribution:Research Institution
Statewide
Total Undergraduate Degrees
1.5%
by Graduation Rate
43.5%
At-Risk16.6%
Retention to 30 Hours
4.9%
Retention to 60 Hours
10.8%
Retention to 90 Hours
22.7%
18
GAIFAC Recommendation – Next Steps
Considered by full Coordinating Board on April 25
Request weights from each institutionConduct a study of the At-Risk Degrees
measureSubmit Initial Model to the LBB (November
1)Update with FY 2014 dataSubmit Final Model to the LBB (March 1)
19
Total Undergraduate Degrees
Total number of Bachelor’s Degrees awarded by an institution in a given year.
Accountability measure #10 Number of degrees reported on the CBM009 –
Graduation Report for the fiscal year Fiscal year 2012 includes fall 2011, spring 2012, and summer
2012 reports Multiple degrees earned by a single student are included Double Majors are counted as a single degree Degrees included
Baccalaureate Associate of Applied Science (AAS)
Excludes certificates
20
Total Undergraduate Degrees by 6-Year Graduation RateTotal Bachelor’s Degrees multiplied by the school’s six-year graduation rate
To incent timely completion.
6-Year Graduation Rate – Accountability measure #9 First-time entering degree-seeking students who enrolled in an
minimum of 12 semester credit hours their first fall semester who graduated from the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution after four, five, and six academic years. This metric includes Social Security Number changes submitted on the CBM00N. First-time determined by the first-time student flag on the CBM001. Sources: CBM001, CBM002, CBM009, CBM00N
Same Fiscal Year as degrees reported For fiscal year 2012, cohort started in fall 2006
Includes same and other institutions Upper-Level institutions use 3-Year Completion Rate
First-time junior level students transferring in who graduated from the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution after three academic years.
UT-Brownsville, TAMU-Texarkana, UH-Clear Lake, UH-Victoria, and Sul Ross Rio Grande.
New institutions calculated with parent graduation rate TAMU-Central Texas, TAMU-San Antonio, and UNT-Dallas.
Example
Institution Degrees Rate Points
A 9,000 80% 7,200
B 200 30% 60
21
Total Undergraduate Degrees per 100 FTSEDegrees divided by Full-Time Student Equivalents (FTSEs) and multiplied by 100.
This aggregate measure adjusts for part-time and transfer students, providing a common framework for comparing degree productivity among institutions with different missions and student bodies.
Degrees same as the first factor Undergraduate Full-time student equivalents (FTSE) –
Accountability measure #2 Number of semester credit hours (SCH) reported on the
CBM004 – Class Report for the fall of the fiscal year For fiscal year 2012, fall 2011
Includes state funded undergraduate semester credit hours
Excludes non-state funded and graduate semester credit hours
Undergraduate Semester Credit Hours divided by 15 to convert to FTSE
ExampleDegrees SCH
FTSE (SCH/15)
Points (Degrees/(FTSE/100))
4,930 255,000
17,000 29
22
At-Risk Degrees
Degrees awarded to students who meet federal criteria for being at high risk for non-completion.
Indicators are being a federal Pell Grant recipient, below average SAT/ACT score, part-time student, GED recipient, or entering higher education at age 20 or older.
One point for each student awarded degrees in the first measure that meets one or more of the conditions1. Reported by any institution as a “Pell Grant
recipient” in the Financial Aid Database System (FADS) during the last 10 years
2. Earned an SAT or ACT score below the national average Scores reported on the CBM00B – Admissions Report or by the College
Board National Averages posted on www.collegeboard.org or www.act.org
3. Part-Time (taking less than 12 hours) when reported as first-time in college on the CBM001 – Student Report
4. General Education Degree (GED) recipients for the last six years Data provided by the Texas Education Agency (TEA) upon request
5. 20 or older by date of birth field on the CBM001 – Student Report when reported as first-time in college
Student
Received Pell Grant
Earned a Below Average SAT or
ACT Score
First-Time in College
and Attended less than
12Received a GED
First-Time
in College and 20 or Older Points
A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1
B No No Yes No No 1
C No No No No No 0
23
At-Risk – Data Elements
Degrees awarded to students who meet federal criteria for being at high risk for non-completion.
Indicators are being a federal Pell Grant recipient, below average SAT/ACT score, part-time student, GED recipient, or entering higher education at age 20 or older.
CBM009 - Graduation2 - Institution Code3 - Student Identification Number6 - Date of Birth7 - Degree Conferred8 - Level of Degree or Certificate Conferred9 - Major
CBM001 – Student2 - Institution Code3 - Student Identification Number5 - Classification6 - Date of Birth9 - Transfer Student or First-Time-in-College10A - Semester Credit Hour Load, On-Campus10 - B Semester Credit Hour Load, Off-Campus13 - Semester14 - Year31 - Dual Credit Course Semester Credit Hours
CBM00N – Student Number Change2 - Institution Code 3 - Current Student Identification Number 4 - Current Date of Birth 6 - Prior Student Identification Number7 - Prior Date of Birth
FAD - Financial Aid Database
1B - FICE 1D - Student Social Security Number/ID Number 31A - Federal Pell
CBM00B - Admissions2 - Institution Code3 - Student Identification Number24 - Application Year25 - ACT Composite Score26 - SAT Combined Score
TEA GED DataStudent Identification NumberGED Certification Date
SAT and ACT National Averageswww.collegeboard.orgwww.act.org
24
Retention to 30, 60, and 90 Hours
Points awarded for students who complete their 30th, 60th, or 90th hour at the institution.
To incentivize the use of effective persistence policies.
One point awarded for students successfully completing 30, 60, or 90 hours at the institution as reported on the CBM00S – Student Schedule Report Last five years – FY 2012 includes data from fall 2007 to summer 2012 Successful completion reported as A, B, C, D, or Credit/Passed in 24 Prior to summer 2011, students receiving a failing grade are included in counts
All undergraduate students enrolled at the institution College-level hours earned at the institution currently
enrolled Exclude hours earned at other institutions Exclude developmental education hours
Examples
Student
Hours Earned at the
Institution in prior Fiscal
Years
Hours Earned at
the Institution in current Fiscal Year Total Points
1 0 30 30 1
2 21 24 45 1
3 30 30 60 1
4 45 12 57 0
5 60 30 90 1
6 75 30 105 1
7 90 30 120 0
8 29 45 74 2
25
Retention– Data Elements
Points awarded for students who complete their 30th, 60th, or 90th hour at the institution.
To incentivize the use of effective persistence policies.
CBM001 – Student 2 - Institution Code3 - Student Identification Number5 - Classification6 - Date of birth18 - Semester
CBM00N – Student Number change2 - Institution Code 3 - Current Student Identification Number 4 - Current Date of Birth 6 - Prior Student Identification Number7 - Prior Date of Birth
Prior to summer 2011 CBM002 – Texas Success Initiative
2 - Institution Code3 - Student Identification Number4 - Reporting period5 - Year10A - Semester Credit Hours Completed
Summer 2011 and after CBM00S – Student Schedule
2 - Institution Code3 - Student Identification Number10 - Semester Credit Hour Value19 - Developmental Education Course/Intervention Level (value=0)24 - Course Grade (value=1, 2, 3, 4, 8)29 - Semester