surrey transport plan...1 executive summary extensive consultation and close partnership working are...
TRANSCRIPT
Surrey Transport Plan
Epsom and Ewell Local Transport Strategy & Forward Programme
Consultation Report
September 2014
ITEM 10
Page 171
Blank Page
ITEM 10
Page 172
Alternative formats
Surrey County Council has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document.
We are happy to give information in either large print or in another language. If you want this service please call us on 03456 009 009.
If you have other needs in this regard please contact Surrey County Council in one of the following ways.
In writing Surrey County Council Transport Policy (Room 420) Environment & Infrastructure Directorate County Hall Kingston upon Thames Surrey KT1 2DN By phone 03456 009 009 Minicom: 020 8541 9698 Online Email: [email protected] www.surreycc.gov.uk/
ITEM 10
Page 173
i
Surrey Transport Plan
Local Transport Strategies and Forward Programmes Tranche 1 Consultation Report- Epsom and Ewell
September 2014
Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1
1 Approach to Consultation .......................................................................................... 1
1.1 Consultations undertaken ................................................................................... 2
1.2 Consultation process .......................................................................................... 2
1.3 Wider engagement activities ............................................................................... 3
1.4 Who responded to the consultation ..................................................................... 3
1.5 Key themes of representations and resulting changes ....................................... 6
ITEM 10
Page 174
1
Executive Summary
Extensive consultation and close partnership working are at the heart of the Surrey
Transport Plan and our approach to transport in the county.
This report describes the consultation process for the Epsom and Ewell Local
Transport Strategy and Forward Programme and how this has shaped the Strategy
going forward. All consultation responses received were considered in the revision of
the draft strategy.
The county council has produced a Strategic Environmental Assessment screening
report and an Equalities Impact Assessment.
Consultation and participation will continue to inform the future revisions of the
strategies and the forward programmes, as they are implemented.
1 Approach to Consultation
Extensive consultation and close partnership working are at the heart of the Surrey
Transport Plan and our approach to transport in the county.
This report describes the consultation process for the Local Transport Strategies and
Forward Programmes included in the first tranche of district and borough strategies.
This report summarises who responded to the consultation, the key issues which
emerged from the representations received and how the strategy was revised in
consequence.
The main purpose of consulting and engaging on the draft Local Transport
Strategies (LTSs) was to:
a) inform people
b) get feedback on the Epsom and Ewell Local Transport Strategy and
Forward Programme
c) seek local input on the Epsom and Ewell Local Transport Strategy and
Forward Programme
The county council would like to thank all those who commented on the Local
Transport Strategies and Forward Programmes.
ITEM 10
Page 175
2
1.1 Consultations undertaken
The following Local Transport Strategies were consulted upon as part of Tranche 1
public consultation:
· Elmbridge Local Transport Strategy and Forward Programme
· Epsom and Ewell Local Transport Strategy and Forward Programme
· Mole Valley Local Transport Strategy and Forward Programme
· Spelthorne Local Transport Strategy and Forward Programme
· Woking Borough Local Transport Strategy and Forward Programme
1.2 Consultation process
The strategies were subject to a 6 week online public consultation from 22 May to 2
July 2014. The consultation documents were published on the Surrey County
Council website. The public and stakeholders were asked three key questions in an
online survey in relation to the programme:
1. We have tried to identify the most pressing transport issues impacting the
District/Borough. Are there any other transport problems that we should
consider?
2. The strategy looks to support the planned growth within the District/Borough
and mitigate any negative impacts. Are the aims and objectives of the strategy
right?
3. Are there any other schemes we should consider that we have not included in
the Forward Programme (see Annex)?
The draft local transport strategies and forward programmes were available as hard
copies at the District/Borough Offices and at County Hall. Leaflets and posters were
sent to all Surrey libraries in the relevant districts/boroughs and local council offices.
Information was sent by email to:
· All Surrey Transport Plan consultees
· All County councillors
· All Borough/District councillors
· All Parish councillors where applicable
ITEM 10
Page 176
3
Figure 1-1: The final week of consultation on the Local Transport Strategies
was the headline on the county council’s website
1.3 Wider engagement activities
Various engagement activities were used to inform the development of the Local
Transport Strategies. This included officer workshops, Informal Local Committee,
task groups and partnership working with borough officers.
Consultation and participation will continue to inform the revision of the strategies.
1.4 Who responded to the consultation
The first tranche of LTSs received 46 responses to the online survey as well as a
number of responses by email, split between the five boroughs and districts.
Respondents to the online survey were fairly split between male (43.59%) and
female (43.59%). The most common age range of respondents was 60 and over
(41%).
ITEM 10
Page 177
4
Approximately 72% of respondents to the survey did not consider themselves to
have a disability. The most common disability identified by respondents to the
survey was mobility issues.
ITEM 10
Page 178
5
There were 11 responses to the consultation via the online survey; other responses
were received by email. Responses were received from a wide range of individuals
and organisations, including the Epsom and Ewell Informal Local Committee, Surrey
County Council officers, the Royal Borough of Kingston, Natural England, the
Highways Agency, and the Epsom and Ewell Cycling Action Group.
ITEM 10
Page 179
6
1.5 Key themes of representations and resulting changes
The key themes which came out of the public consultation were cycling, use of public
transport, expansion of Zone 6 and use of London’s Oyster Card.
In response to these themes relevant officers were asked to assist in the
modification of the transport strategy to reflect these concerns. Working with
specialist officers in each area and with the collaboration of other SCC officers, each
concern expressed in the consultation has been responded to in the annex to this
consultation report. Many of the issues raised have been looked into before as part
of previous or ongoing work streams, particularly within the other strategies which
form part of the LTP3.
It was therefore decided to add significantly to Section 6 - Related Workstreams in
order to provide the context of the Local Transport Strategy and to show the reader,
that where their concern may not have been addressed in the LTS, it may have been
addressed as part of one of the other LTP3 strategies or in a related SCC or EEBC
initiative.
Other amendments have been made to the draft Epsom and Ewell Local Transport
Strategy and Forward Programme in response to several of the comments received.
These amendments include:
· Restructuring of document to ensure consistency and improve readability.
· Reference added to the LTP3 and to the priorities of the SCC environment
and infrastructure directorate in section 2 to provide context for the Strategy
and Forward Programme.
· Sections added on access to airports and environmental issues to improve
consistency with LTP3.
· Passenger transport, bus provision section amended in section 3 to reflect
measures SCC will seek to implement to improve bus infrastructure.
· Description of the Surrey transport network added to provide a wider context
of the borough of Epsom and Ewell.
· Minor amendments throughout the document to improve accuracy, readability
and provide up to date information.
ITEM 10
Page 180
7
An
ne
x:
Pu
bli
c C
on
su
lta
tio
n r
es
po
nse
s
Co
mm
en
t
refe
ren
ce
#
Su
rve
y
Re
sp
on
se
#
Re
sp
on
se
to
qu
es
tio
n
Pu
bli
c C
om
me
nt
on
th
e E
ps
om
an
d E
well
LT
S a
nd
Fo
rwa
rd
Pro
gra
mm
e
SC
C r
es
po
ns
e
EE
1
2
2
(oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
Imp
rovin
g p
ub
lic t
ran
sp
ort
fo
r p
eo
ple
with
dis
ab
ilitie
s.
The
DD
A le
gis
latio
n r
equ
ire
s a
ll b
use
s to
be
fu
lly a
cce
ssib
le b
y J
an
ua
ry 2
01
7.
The
act se
ts o
ut tim
elin
es w
he
n v
ario
us c
lasse
s o
f b
use
s n
ee
d to
me
et
the
legis
latio
n;
bu
se
s u
p to 7
.5 to
nn
es b
y 1
Ja
n 2
01
5, sin
gle
de
cks o
ve
r 7
.5 to
nn
es b
y
1 J
an 2
01
6 a
nd d
ou
ble
de
cks b
y 1
Ja
n 2
017
. T
he
DD
A w
ill a
ssis
t a
ll p
assen
ge
rs
bu
t p
rim
arily
fo
cu
sse
d o
n th
ose w
ith
dis
ab
ilitie
s.
As tra
nspo
rt a
uth
ority
SC
C w
ill
se
ek to
en
su
re th
at o
ur
bu
s s
top
infr
astr
uctu
re is a
lso
DD
A c
om
plia
nt.
Te
xt
ha
s b
ee
n r
evis
ed
in
Se
ction
2 t
o r
efle
ct
imp
rove
me
nts
so
ugh
t fo
r b
us
infr
astr
uctu
re,
inclu
din
g a
cce
ssib
ility
im
pro
ve
me
nts
an
d p
rovis
ion
of
Co
mm
un
ity
Tra
nsp
ort
in t
he
are
a to
assis
t w
ith
tra
nsp
ort
fo
r th
ose
wh
o m
ay h
ave
mo
bili
ty
pro
ble
ms o
r o
the
r is
sue
s w
hic
h m
ay m
ea
n the
y c
an
no
t a
cce
ss p
ub
lic t
ran
spo
rt
EE
2
2
2
(oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
The
po
ten
tia
l fo
r E
psom
an
d E
we
ll to
be
nefit fr
om
th
e O
yste
r ca
rd
sch
em
e
All
Lo
nd
on B
use
s o
pe
ratin
g in
E&
E a
lre
ad
y u
se
Oyste
r C
ard
, b
y f
ar
the
gre
ate
st
nu
mb
er
of
bu
s d
ep
art
ure
s f
rom
Ep
so
m. T
he r
ea
lity t
ho
ugh
is th
at o
the
r n
on
-
Lo
nd
on
Bu
s s
erv
ice
s w
ill n
ot
en
joy t
he
con
ve
nie
nce
an
d e
co
no
my o
f th
e O
yste
r
sch
em
e, b
ut m
ay w
ell
use
a S
urr
ey le
d s
ma
rtca
rd. T
he
Me
trob
us 4
60
/480
ne
two
rk
off
ers
a s
ma
rtca
rd (
The
Ke
y).
EE
3
7
2
(oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
no
t b
ein
g a
ble
to u
se a
n o
yste
r ca
rd a
t E
psom
sta
tio
n, d
esp
ite
be
ing
ab
le to
use
it o
n b
use
s h
ead
ing in
to L
on
don
bo
rou
gh
s.
Fo
r th
ose
wh
o t
rave
l re
gu
larl
y o
n p
ub
lic t
ran
sp
ort
in
Lo
nd
on
the
y w
ill b
e a
wa
re o
f
ho
w e
asy it
is t
o u
se t
he
Lon
don
fa
res s
tru
ctu
re a
nd t
he
‘O
yste
r’ s
ma
rtca
rd
syste
m. T
his
Cou
ncil
is k
ee
n t
o b
rin
g s
imila
r be
nefits
to
ou
r re
sid
en
ts,
wh
ere
it
is
co
st
eff
ective
to
do
so
. A
ch
ievin
g t
his
will
ne
ed
co
llabo
rative
wo
rkin
g w
ith
a
nu
mb
er
of
pa
rtn
ers
.
Su
rre
y C
ou
nty
Co
un
cil
su
ppo
rts e
xte
nd
ing t
he
Oyste
r syste
m b
eyo
nd
th
e L
on
do
n
bo
un
da
ry.
Exis
tin
g r
ail
fran
ch
ise
s h
ave
a r
equire
me
nt
to in
tro
du
ce
Oyste
r to
a
wid
er
ma
rke
t. W
e c
on
tin
ue
to
wo
rk w
ith
th
e D
fT a
nd
th
e r
ail
ind
ustr
y o
n e
nh
an
cin
g
rail
tra
ve
l, in
clu
din
g t
icke
tin
g in
itia
tive
s,
to b
ette
r in
tegra
te p
asse
nger
tra
nsp
ort
se
rvic
es a
nd
cre
ate
im
pro
ve
d t
rave
l o
ppo
rtu
nitie
s.
Lo
okin
g s
pe
cific
ally
to
Ep
som
Sta
tion
, w
e h
ave
lo
oke
d a
t th
e c
rite
ria
fo
r its
inclu
sio
n in
to L
ond
on T
rave
lca
rd z
on
e 6
. In
th
e m
id 2
000
s E
psom
Do
wn
s a
nd
Tatt
enh
am
Co
rne
r ra
ilwa
y s
tatio
ns w
ere
adde
d in
to th
e z
on
e 6
. T
his
ra
ise
d th
e
issu
e o
f w
hy c
ou
ld n
ot o
the
r sta
tion
s w
ith
in t
ha
t B
oro
ugh
be
in
clu
ded
with
in z
on
e
6,
with
pa
rtic
ula
r re
fere
nce
giv
en
to
Ep
som
Sta
tio
n.
In p
rin
cip
al th
is is w
elc
om
ed
on
th
e b
asis
of m
akin
g t
rain
tra
ve
l o
n th
ose
lin
es
mo
re a
ttra
ctive
, ho
pefu
lly a
ch
ievin
g m
od
al sh
ift, a
nd
als
o h
op
efu
lly r
ed
ucin
g
railh
ea
din
g -
wh
ere
passe
nge
rs d
rive
to
a d
ista
nt
sta
tion
ra
the
r th
an u
se
th
eir lo
ca
l
sta
tio
n,
be
ca
use
of fa
res o
r th
e le
ve
l of
se
rvic
e o
r bo
th, p
utt
ing t
he
m o
ff t
rave
llin
g
from
th
eir lo
ca
l sta
tion
. T
he
de
cis
ion
to
do
th
is w
as a
pu
rely
co
mm
erc
ial o
ne
on
the
pa
rt o
f S
ou
the
rn R
ailw
ays.
While
lig
htly u
se
d s
tatio
ns lik
e E
psom
Do
wn
s a
nd T
atte
nham
Co
rner
are
not
go
ing t
o c
au
se m
ajo
r da
ma
ge
to
tra
in c
om
pa
ny f
ina
nce
s w
he
n t
icket p
rice
s a
re
red
uced
as a
re
su
lt o
f th
eir in
clu
sio
n w
ith
in z
on
e 6
, th
e in
clu
sio
n o
f E
pso
m s
tatio
n
itse
lf a
s S
urr
ey’s
th
ird
bu
sie
st
sta
tion
, w
ou
ld c
ert
ain
ly h
it t
rain
op
era
tor
fin
an
ce
s.
Un
de
rsta
nd
ab
ly f
or
these
re
ason
s E
psom
could
no
t b
e in
clu
de
d a
s n
o p
ub
lic
ITEM 10
Page 181
8
fun
din
g t
o u
nd
erw
rite
th
e c
ost
wa
s a
va
ilab
le a
nd
it w
as n
ot fin
an
cia
lly v
iab
le t
o t
he
tra
in o
pe
rato
r.
EE
4
7
4
(oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
all
bu
s s
top
s in E
pso
m t
ow
n c
en
tre
sh
ou
ld b
e r
elo
ca
ted
to
ou
tsid
e
Ep
som
sta
tio
n t
o r
ed
uce
co
nge
stion
in
th
e h
igh
str
ee
t.
The
va
st
ma
jority
of
bus u
se
rs b
oa
rdin
g a
nd
alig
htin
g in
Ep
so
m t
ow
n c
en
tre
are
no
t u
sin
g t
rain
s. T
o m
ove
th
e b
us s
top
s in
Epso
m w
ou
ld d
isa
dva
nta
ge
a lo
t of
pa
ssen
ge
rs,
and
cou
ld c
au
se issu
es w
ith
ta
xis
. S
CC
will
se
ek t
o p
rovid
e g
oo
d,
dire
ct,
we
ll-sig
ne
d p
ede
str
ian
rou
tes b
etw
ee
n t
he
tw
o m
ode
s,
with
a h
igh
qu
alit
y
pa
ssen
ge
r w
aitin
g e
nvir
on
me
nt
pro
vid
ing r
ea
l tim
e t
rave
l in
form
atio
n a
nd
co
mp
reh
en
siv
e b
us p
ub
licity.
EE
5
7
4
(oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
Too
ma
ny t
raff
ic lig
hts
/pe
de
str
ian
cro
ssin
gs in E
psom
to
wn
ce
ntr
e tha
t
ca
use
tra
ffic
con
ge
stion
- g
et
rid
of
som
e.
Ju
nction
arr
an
gem
ents
to
be
ad
dre
sse
d th
rough
Pla
n E
hig
hw
ay im
pro
ve
me
nts
sch
em
e (
refe
r to
Fo
rwa
rd P
rogra
mm
e s
ch
em
e id
. 8
).
EE
6
15
2
(oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
Pu
blic
tra
nsp
ort
op
tio
ns t
o S
t H
elie
r ho
sp
ita
l –
v f
ew
and
v s
low
, e
sp
wh
en
yo
u c
on
sid
er
it is t
he
ma
in A
&E
fo
r th
e a
rea
.
No
ted
. T
he S
TP
Bu
s S
tra
tegy s
ets
out
ho
w w
e w
ill c
o-o
rdin
ate
the
pu
blic
tra
nsp
ort
netw
ork
in
Su
rre
y,
wo
rkin
g w
ith
co
mm
erc
ial b
us o
pe
rato
rs a
nd
ma
na
gin
g a
netw
ork
th
at
is a
ffo
rdab
le to
th
e c
ou
nty
co
un
cil.
Acce
ss to
hea
lth
ca
re
pro
vis
ion
is o
ne
of
man
y p
rio
ritie
s h
ow
eve
r w
e n
ee
d to
de
live
r th
is in
pa
rtn
ers
hip
with
th
e h
ea
lth
ca
re a
ge
ncie
s
EE
7
15
3
(aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
The
wo
rdin
g in
th
e d
ocu
men
t sa
ys t
ha
t th
e a
im is t
o "
Ad
dre
ss t
he
exis
tin
g a
nd
fu
ture
...tra
ve
l d
em
an
ds o
f re
sid
en
ts,
vis
ito
rs,
bu
sin
esses
an
d th
rou
gh
tra
ffic
" .
i.e
. ad
dre
ss e
xis
tin
g a
nd
fu
ture
dem
and
s,
no
t ju
st
su
ppo
rt p
lan
ned
gro
wth
and
mitig
ate
ne
ga
tive
im
pa
cts
of
pla
nne
d
gro
wth
. T
he
do
cum
en
t w
ord
ing is m
ore
am
bitio
us a
nd
po
sitiv
e t
han
yo
ur
wo
rdin
g in
th
is q
ue
stio
n. I
agre
e w
ith
the a
ims o
f th
e s
tra
tegy b
ut
no
t a
s t
he
y a
re r
efle
cte
d in
th
e w
ord
ing in
th
is q
ue
stio
n.
No
ted
EE
8
15
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
Pu
blic
tra
nsp
ort
op
tio
ns t
o S
t H
elie
r ho
sp
ita
l?
Se
e E
E6
EE
9
26
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
Co
st
of
pub
lic t
ran
spo
rt.
If y
ou
wa
nt
to s
hift
jou
rne
ys f
rom
ca
r to
tra
in
the
n y
ou
nee
d to
red
uce
the
co
st of
rail
jou
rneys.
Th
ey e
xce
ed
bu
s
tra
ve
l co
nsid
era
bly
. A
lso
de
lay p
urc
ha
sin
g t
icke
ts a
t E
pso
m s
tatio
n -
this
add
s s
eve
ral m
inu
tes t
o jo
urn
eys a
nd
oft
en
hu
ge
qu
eu
es s
o n
eed
s
to b
e f
acto
red in
fo
r tr
ave
l tim
es.
If e
pso
m s
tatio
n w
as in
zo
ne
6 th
en
this
pro
ble
m w
ou
ld g
o a
wa
y. W
hy n
o m
en
tio
n o
f m
ovin
g t
o z
on
e 6
in
the
do
cum
en
t?
Se
e E
E3
EE
10
2
(o
the
r
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
No
men
tion
of
bu
s c
onge
stio
n.
Ma
ny b
use
s a
re f
ull
and
so c
ann
ot ta
ke
mo
re p
assen
ge
rs.
Mo
re im
po
rtan
t to
pu
t on
mo
re b
us c
ap
acity t
han
bu
s info
rmatio
n im
pro
ve
s.
Lo
nd
on
Bu
se
s h
as r
ece
ntly in
cre
ase
d t
he
fre
qu
en
cy o
f som
e r
ou
tes t
o h
elp
pro
vid
e g
rea
ter
ca
pa
city.
Te
nd
s t
o b
e a
pa
rtic
ula
r is
su
e fo
r th
e p
op
ula
r (a
nd
ch
eap
) L
on
don
Bu
s r
ou
tes. P
rovid
ing t
his
add
itio
na
l ca
pa
city r
esp
on
ds to
som
e o
f
the
se issu
es. S
CC
will
wo
rk w
ith
Lo
nd
on
Bu
se
s o
n s
uch m
att
ers
.
ITEM 10
Page 182
9
EE
11
2
(o
the
r
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
Als
o h
ow
abo
ut e
xp
ress b
us s
erv
ice
s t
o p
laces s
uch
as k
ingsto
n.
Bu
se
s ta
ke
lo
t lo
nge
r to
re
ach d
estin
atio
n a
nd
th
is is w
hy p
eo
ple
wo
n't
sw
itch
fro
m c
ar
to b
us. T
he
diffe
ren
ce
in
tra
ve
l tim
es is c
on
sid
era
ble
an
d c
an
be
do
ub
le. L
oo
k a
t b
us r
ou
tes f
or
key jo
urn
eys,
eg e
pso
m to
Su
tton
.
LB
op
era
te r
ela
tive
ly f
ew
exp
ress s
erv
ice
s.
Pa
tro
na
ge
le
ve
ls w
ou
ld im
pa
ct
on
an
y
de
cis
ion
to
op
era
te e
xp
ress s
erv
ice
s a
nd
it is
an
ticip
ate
d t
ha
t pa
trona
ge
le
ve
ls
from
Ep
som
to
wn
ce
ntr
e t
o K
ingsto
n fo
r e
xa
mp
le to
ju
stify
; o
ne
of
the
re
aso
ns
bu
se
s c
an
be
att
ractive
is t
ha
t th
ey s
top
eve
ry 4
00
m o
r so
to
pic
k u
p p
asse
nge
rs -
the
y a
re a
cce
ssib
le.
EE
12
2
(o
the
r
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
Impa
ct
of
cro
ssra
il 2
. N
ot
co
ve
red
by d
ocum
en
t . B
us u
sa
ge
aff
ecte
d b
y
mix
ture
of
pa
ym
ent
meth
od
s.
Som
e o
yste
r o
the
r ca
sh.
Sta
nd
ard
isa
tio
n
wo
uld
be
go
od.
Fe
w o
utle
ts to
to
p u
p O
yste
r ca
rds in
ep
som
. C
ost
of
so
me b
us jo
urn
eys ie
no
n o
yste
r is
dis
pro
po
rtio
na
tely
hig
h.
Po
ints
no
ted
; fa
res o
n L
ond
on
Bu
se
s s
erv
ice
s a
re a
ttra
ctive
ho
we
ve
r in
Su
rre
y
diffe
rent
tran
sp
ort
le
gis
latio
n a
pp
lies -
it's a
dere
gu
late
d b
us m
ark
et.
Lo
nd
on
is
regu
late
d.
EE
13
26
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
Se
e a
nsw
er
to q
2.
Yes p
ut m
on
ey in
to c
om
pe
nsa
tin
g.
Ra
il co
mp
an
ies
to a
llow
ep
som
to
go
into
zo
ne
6. T
his
wo
uld
in
cre
ase
ra
il tr
ave
l
ove
rnig
ht!
!
Se
e E
E3
and
EE
6
EE
14
29
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
Pro
ble
ms n
ot
ide
ntified:
- L
ack o
f e
xp
ress b
us r
ou
tes –
mea
ns b
us journ
eys f
or
po
pu
lar
rou
tes
take
mu
ch
lo
nge
r th
an c
ar.
Th
is is a
ba
rrie
r to
in
cre
asin
g u
pta
ke
of
bu
se
s o
ve
r ca
r in
Ep
som
. B
ette
r to
red
uce
num
be
r of
de
tou
rs o
ff m
ain
rou
te th
an
pro
po
sed
ch
an
ge
s to
bu
s s
he
lte
rs e
tc.
Se
e E
E11
. B
use
s s
top f
requ
en
tly t
o p
ick u
p c
usto
me
rs.
Ho
we
ve
r o
pe
rato
rs a
nd
SC
C c
an
use
pa
ssen
ge
r d
ata
to u
nd
ers
tan
d th
e v
alu
e o
f th
e d
eto
urs
an
d r
evis
ing
rou
tes a
cco
rdin
gly
EE
15
29
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
- O
ve
rcro
wd
ing o
n b
use
s f
rom
Ep
som
. S
om
e k
ey r
ou
tes a
re
ove
rcro
wd
ed
on r
etu
rn jo
urn
ey t
o E
psom
/Ew
ell
an
d s
o p
eop
le n
ot
like
ly
to s
witch
fro
m c
ars
as th
ey d
on
't w
an
t to
sta
nd
, e
g b
us t
o K
ingsto
n o
r
Su
tton
.
Se
e E
E10
EE
16
29
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
-Tic
ke
t p
rob
lem
s a
t E
pso
m s
tation
. O
fte
n v
ery
lo
ng q
ue
ue
s f
or
tickets
an
d a
s n
ot
in z
on
e 6
pe
op
le b
uy t
icke
ts o
n d
aily
/we
ekly
ba
sis
. If
sta
tio
n
wa
s in
zo
ne
6 t
he
n th
ey c
ou
ld u
se
oyste
r ca
rd a
nd
qu
eue
wo
uld
go
aw
ay.
Als
o t
icke
t m
achin
es o
fte
n b
rea
k d
ow
n.
Se
e E
E3
and
EE
6
EE
17
29
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
- N
ot
all
bu
se
s ta
ke
oyste
r ca
rd f
rom
Ep
som
. T
his
is c
onfu
sin
g f
or
pa
ssen
ge
rs a
nd p
uts
pe
op
le o
ff u
sin
g b
use
s. A
lso
not
en
ou
gh
oyste
r
ca
rd o
utle
ts to
to
p u
p o
yste
r ca
rds in
Ep
so
m. T
his
pu
ts p
eo
ple
off
usin
g
bu
se
s. Im
pro
ve
d info
rma
tion
ab
ou
t tickets
for
pa
sse
nge
rs a
t sto
ps
mig
ht
he
lp.
Oyste
r is
a L
ond
on
Buse
s p
rodu
ct.
SC
C c
on
tin
ue
s to
wo
rk w
ith
Lo
ndo
n B
use
s to
se
cu
re a
dd
itio
na
l O
yste
r o
utlets
EE
18
29
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
- H
igh
price
s f
or
tra
in jo
urn
eys f
rom
Ep
so
m a
s n
ot
in o
yste
r ca
rd z
on
e
un
like
Ew
ell
Ea
st e
tc.
Se
e E
E3
and
EE
6.
EE
19
29
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
- H
igh
price
s a
nd
po
or
bu
s s
erv
ice
fro
m E
psom
go
ing in
to s
urr
ey,
eg
Ash
tea
d a
nd b
eyo
nd.
Bu
s p
ricin
g v
ery
old
fash
ion
ed
an
d h
igh
esp
. fo
r
sh
ort
jo
urn
eys.
Co
mm
erc
ially
op
era
ted
se
rvic
es,
an
d f
are
s a
re s
et
by t
he
bu
s o
pe
rato
r. F
are
s
ma
y b
e c
on
sid
ere
d e
xp
en
siv
e in
com
pa
riso
n w
ith
re
gu
late
d L
on
don
fa
res.
EE
20
29
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
Ye
s b
ut
do
es n
ot in
clu
de
aff
ect of
tra
nspo
rt c
ha
nge
s s
uch
as c
rossra
il
2.
Se
e r
evis
ed
pa
ragra
ph 3
.27
fo
r in
form
ation
on
Cro
ssra
il 2
.
Su
rre
y R
ail
Str
ate
gy w
ill c
on
sid
er
eff
ects
of
Cro
ssra
il 2
fu
rth
er.
EE
21
29
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
No
t co
nsid
ere
d:
Imp
rovin
g t
icke
tin
g in
form
atio
n a
t bu
s s
top
s
su
bsid
isin
g m
ove
/pu
ttin
g p
ressu
re o
n t
rain
com
pan
ies fo
r in
clu
sio
n o
f
Ep
som
sta
tio
n in
oyste
r ca
rd z
on
e.
Se
e E
E3
ITEM 10
Page 183
10
EE
22
29
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
red
uced
pa
rkin
g c
osts
fo
r tr
ain
use
rs in
Ep
som
at
we
eke
nd a
s a
t E
we
ll
West
sta
tion
.
All
on
-str
ee
t p
ark
ing t
ha
t e
xis
ts f
or
ge
ne
ral u
se
in
E&
E is c
urr
en
tly f
ree
. S
urr
ey
Co
un
ty C
ou
ncil
do
es n
ot
op
era
te t
he
ca
r p
ark
s in
E&
E.
EE
23
29
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
En
co
ura
gin
g b
us a
nd
tra
in c
han
ge
s a
s p
er
my a
nsw
er
to q
ue
stio
n 2
.
The
pro
po
sed
cha
nge
s t
o b
us s
he
lte
rs a
nd
re
liab
ility
wo
n't
ma
ke
much
diffe
ren
ce
as t
he
y d
on
't ge
t to
th
e k
ey b
arr
iers
to
in
cre
asin
g b
us u
sage
in E
psom
. M
ore
re
sea
rch
on b
us u
sa
ge
is n
ee
ded
- m
ayb
e lo
ca
l fo
cu
s
gro
up
of
bu
s u
se
rs?
SC
C a
ims to
ma
ke u
sin
g b
us s
erv
ice
s m
ore
att
ractive
and
con
ve
nie
nt a
nd t
his
inclu
de
s a
ra
nge
of
activitie
s;
fre
qu
en
cy, fa
res,
rou
tes,
info
rmatio
n a
nd
ma
rke
tin
g,
hig
h q
ua
lity o
ffe
r e
tc. T
he
lo
ca
l fo
cu
s g
rou
p s
ho
uld
be
with
no
n-u
se
rs t
o
un
de
rsta
nd
the
ir n
ee
ds a
nd
exp
ecta
tio
ns, a
s w
ell
as w
ith
exis
tin
g u
se
rs t
o e
nsu
re
the
se c
usto
me
rs a
re r
eta
ined
.
EE
24
30
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
-Hig
h p
rice
s a
nd
po
or
bu
s s
erv
ice
fro
m E
psom
go
ing in
to s
urr
ey,
eg
Ash
tea
d a
nd b
eyo
nd. B
us p
ricin
g v
ery
old
fash
ion
ed
an
d h
igh
esp
. fo
r
sh
ort
jo
urn
eys.
Se
e E
E19
EE
25
30
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
- H
igh
price
s f
or
tra
in jo
urn
eys f
rom
Ep
so
m a
s n
ot
in o
yste
r ca
rd z
on
e
un
like
Ew
ell
Ea
st e
tc.
Se
e E
E3
EE
26
30
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
-No
t a
ll b
use
s t
ake
oyste
r ca
rd f
rom
Ep
som
. T
his
is c
onfu
sin
g f
or
pa
ssen
ge
rs a
nd p
uts
pe
op
le o
ff u
sin
g b
use
s. A
lso
not
en
ou
gh
oyste
r
ca
rd o
utle
ts to
to
p u
p o
yste
r ca
rds in
Ep
so
m. T
his
pu
ts p
eo
ple
off
usin
g
bu
se
s. Im
pro
ve
d info
rma
tion
ab
ou
t tickets
for
pa
sse
nge
rs a
t sto
ps
mig
ht
he
lp.
Se
e E
E17
EE
27
30
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
-Tic
ke
t p
rob
lem
s a
t E
pso
m s
tation
. O
fte
n v
ery
lo
ng q
ue
ue
s f
or
tickets
an
d a
s n
ot
in
zo
ne
6 p
eo
ple
bu
y t
icke
ts o
n d
aily
/we
ekly
ba
sis
.
If s
tatio
n w
as in
zo
ne
6 t
hen
the
y c
ou
ld u
se
oyste
r ca
rd a
nd q
ue
ue
wo
uld
go
aw
ay.
Als
o t
icke
t m
ach
ine
s o
ften
bre
ak d
ow
n.
Se
e E
E3
EE
28
30
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
-Ove
rcro
wd
ing o
n
bu
se
s f
rom
Ep
so
m.
Som
e k
ey r
ou
tes a
re o
ve
rcro
wd
ed
on
re
turn
jou
rne
y t
o E
psom
/Ew
ell
an
d s
o p
eo
ple
no
t lik
ely
to
sw
itch
fro
m c
ars
as t
he
y d
on
't w
an
t to
sta
nd
,
eg b
us to
K
ingsto
n o
r S
utt
on
.
Se
e E
E10
EE
29
30
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
-La
ck o
f e
xp
ress b
us r
ou
tes –
mea
ns b
us journ
eys f
or
po
pu
lar
rou
tes
take
mu
ch
lo
nge
r th
an c
ar.
Th
is is a
ba
rrie
r to
in
cre
asin
g u
pta
ke
of
bu
se
s o
ve
r ca
r in
Ep
som
. B
ette
r to
red
uce
num
be
r of
de
tou
rs o
ff m
ain
rou
te th
an
pro
po
sed
ch
an
ge
s to
bu
s s
he
lte
rs e
tc.
Se
e E
E11
EE
30
30
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
No
t co
nsid
ere
d-
Imp
rovin
g t
icke
tin
g in
form
atio
n a
t bu
s s
top
s.
T
he
Su
rre
y T
ran
spo
rt P
lan
Pa
sse
nge
r T
ran
sp
ort
Str
ate
gy c
ove
rs im
pro
ve
me
nts
to
ticke
tin
g info
rma
tion
at b
us s
top
s; te
xt
ha
s b
ee
n a
dd
ed
to
se
ctio
n 3
an
d s
ectio
n 6
wh
ich
re
fle
cts
th
is.
EE
31
30
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
QR
co
de
s a
t b
us s
top
s w
ith
lin
k t
o t
ime
tab
les.
P
rogra
mm
e in
pla
nn
ing
Im
pro
ve
men
ts to
pa
sse
nge
r in
form
ation
at
bu
s s
top
s a
re
co
ve
red
in
the
Pa
sse
nge
r T
ran
spo
rt Info
rma
tio
n S
tra
tegy,
pa
rt o
f th
e S
urr
ey
Tra
nsp
ort
Pla
n. S
ection
3 o
f LT
S r
evis
ed
to
refle
ct p
ote
ntia
l im
pro
ve
men
ts.
ITEM 10
Page 184
11
EE
32
30
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
Su
bsid
isin
g o
r pu
t p
ressu
re o
n t
rain
co
mp
an
ies f
or
inclu
sio
n o
f E
psom
sta
tio
n in
oyste
r ca
rd z
on
e.
Se
e E
E3
EE
33
30
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
Re
du
ced
pa
rkin
g c
osts
fo
r tr
ain
use
rs in
Ep
som
at
we
eke
nd a
s a
t E
we
ll
West
sta
tion
.
EE
22
EE
34
30
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
Tra
ffic
wa
rde
ns t
o m
onito
r fo
r ca
rs b
lockin
g b
us s
top
s in
Ep
som
. T
his
ha
pp
en
s a
lo
t a
nd
so b
use
s s
top
aw
ay f
rom
bu
s s
top
wh
ich
is s
tre
ssfu
l
for
eld
erly a
nd
dis
ab
led
pa
sse
nge
rs.
Pa
rkin
g e
nfo
rce
me
nt
is m
an
age
d b
y E
&E
BC
.
Su
gge
stio
n t
o b
e p
asse
d to
EE
BC
.
EE
35
30
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
Ta
lk to
bu
s c
om
pa
nie
s a
bou
t in
tro
of
exp
ress b
us s
erv
ice
s f
rom
Ep
so
m
to k
ey d
estin
ation
s,
eg s
utt
on
, che
am
, kin
gsto
n.
Oth
er
po
ints
as p
er
q
2.
Se
e p
revio
us r
esp
on
se (
EE
11
)
EE
36
32
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
Impa
ct
of
an
y p
rop
osed
cycle
la
ne
s o
n t
raff
ic (
lack o
f spa
ce
ge
ne
rally
)
Un
fort
una
tely
in
ma
ny p
lace
s th
ere
is n
ot e
nou
gh
sp
ace f
or
hig
h q
ua
lity c
ycle
rou
tes w
ith
ou
t ta
kin
g s
pa
ce
aw
ay f
rom
re
gu
lar
tra
ffic
. If
we
are
to b
e s
ucce
ssfu
l in
pro
mo
tin
g m
od
al sh
ift w
e w
ill n
ee
d to
co
nsid
er
allo
ca
tin
g r
oad
spa
ce
to
alte
rna
tive
mo
de
s in
pre
fere
nce t
o t
he
priva
te c
ar.
In
do
ing s
o t
he
alte
rna
tive
mo
de
be
com
es
mo
re a
ttra
ctive
an
d th
e p
riva
te c
ar
be
co
me
s le
ss a
ttra
ctive
.
EE
36a
32
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
- p
olic
y o
f a
llow
ing m
ajo
r
de
ve
lop
me
nts
e.g
. A
ldi a
nd L
idl, w
hic
h w
ou
ld b
rin
g m
ore
tra
ffic
to
the
are
a -
ca
r p
ark
s s
ho
uld
no
t ch
arg
e,
or
if t
he
y d
o n
o m
ore
th
an 5
0p
, as
hig
h c
ha
rge
s c
au
se
park
ing o
n r
oa
ds
EE
36a
refe
rs t
o a
po
licy o
f a
llow
ing m
ajo
r de
ve
lopm
ents
to t
he
are
a-
eg A
ldi a
nd
Lid
l b
rin
gin
g m
ore
tra
ffic
to
th
e a
rea
. S
CC
does n
ot a
ctive
ly s
ee
k la
rge
re
taile
rs to
de
ve
lop
pie
ce
s o
f la
nd
an
d w
he
n p
resen
ted
with
a d
eve
lopm
ent
the
tra
ffic
ge
ne
rate
d is c
on
sid
ere
d v
ery
ca
refu
lly. W
e a
re b
ou
nd b
y N
atio
na
l po
licy a
s w
ell
as lo
ca
l p
olic
y a
nd
if
the
tra
ffic
ge
ne
rate
d d
oes n
ot p
rodu
ce
a 'se
ve
re' i
mpa
ct
it is
difficu
lt to
refu
se
in
te
rms o
f th
e N
PP
F.
Pro
po
sa
ls f
or
ne
w f
oo
dsto
res w
ill b
e a
sse
ssed
aga
inst e
xis
tin
g a
do
pte
d p
olic
y
co
nta
ine
d w
ith
in L
oca
l P
lan
po
licy a
nd
will
ne
ed
to
be
po
licy c
om
plia
nt.
P
rop
osa
ls
for
ne
w f
ood
sto
res th
at a
re o
ve
r a
nd
ab
ove
the
sca
le o
f n
eed
id
en
tifie
d w
ith
in P
lan
E w
ill n
ee
d t
o d
em
on
str
ate
a n
ee
d fo
r a
dd
itio
na
l p
rovis
ion
– in
acco
rda
nce
with
na
tion
al p
lan
nin
g p
olic
y.
All
of
the
se
pro
po
sals
will
ne
ed
to
en
su
re th
at m
itig
ate
aga
inst
an
y id
en
tifie
d a
dve
rse
im
pa
cts
in
th
e a
rea
; m
ost
no
tab
ly t
hro
ugh
on
-site
or
off
-site
wo
rks a
gre
ed
th
rou
gh
the
S1
06 p
rovis
ion
.
Pu
blic
pa
rkin
g c
ha
rgin
g r
egim
e r
egim
es f
orm
an
im
po
rta
nt com
pon
en
t in
ma
na
gin
g c
ar
use
an
d e
ncou
ragin
g m
ore
su
sta
ina
ble
tra
ve
l p
atte
rns –
prim
arily
by e
nco
ura
gin
g lin
ke
d trip
s.
Th
e B
oro
ugh
and
Co
un
ty C
ou
ncil
are
re
sp
on
sib
le fo
r
ma
na
gin
g a
nd
enfo
rcin
g a
ga
inst
ille
ga
l o
n-s
tre
et p
ark
ing.
The
Bo
rou
gh
Co
un
cil
is
co
mm
itte
d to
en
su
rin
g t
ha
t n
ew
de
ve
lopm
ents
pro
vid
e a
n a
pp
rop
ria
te le
ve
l of
on
-
site
pa
rkin
g t
o m
ee
t th
eir n
eed
s a
nd
pre
ve
nt d
isp
lacem
en
t on
th
e s
urr
ou
nd
ing
resid
en
tia
l ro
ad
ne
two
rk.
EE
37
32
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
Mo
stly O
K,
bu
t p
lea
se
co
nsid
er
2 a
bo
ve
N
ote
d
ITEM 10
Page 185
12
EE
38
32
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
ple
ase s
pe
cify s
ee
2 a
bo
ve
N
ote
d
EE
39
Re
ce
ive
d v
ia
em
ail
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
1.
SC
HO
OLS
The
im
pa
ct of
the s
ch
oo
l ru
n o
n t
raff
ic c
on
ge
stio
n is a
ckn
ow
led
ge
d in
the
Do
cu
me
nt. T
he
im
pa
ct of
inco
nsid
era
te p
ark
ing a
nd
co
nfr
on
tation
with
lo
ca
l re
sid
en
ts is w
ell
rep
ort
ed
, bu
t ne
ithe
r th
e H
ea
d T
ea
ch
er
no
r a
Co
un
ty C
ou
ncil
po
licy d
ocum
en
t is
lik
ely
to
be
ab
le t
o a
ch
ieve
a
de
sira
ble
sh
ift
to m
ore
wa
lkin
g,
cyclin
g a
nd
pu
blic
tra
nsp
ort
use
. W
e
su
gge
st
the
re
insta
tem
en
t of
the
Safe
Ro
ute
s to
Scho
ols
Off
ice
r,
po
ssib
ly s
ha
red
with
oth
er
Dis
tric
ts,
wh
o w
ou
ld h
ave
exp
ert
ise
and
tim
e
to t
alk
to
pa
rents
, pu
pils
, e
tc.
SC
C is p
rep
arin
g a
Tra
nsp
ort
Str
ate
gy f
or
Scho
ols
– s
ee
re
vis
ed
pa
ragra
ph
6.3
1
for
info
.
Su
rre
y C
ou
nty
Co
un
cil
ha
s n
o p
ow
ers
to
ob
lige
pa
ren
ts t
o ta
ke t
he
ir c
hild
ren
to
sch
oo
l b
y a
lte
rna
tive
mo
de
s to
th
e p
riva
te c
ar.
O
nly
by m
akin
g t
he p
riva
te c
ar
incre
asin
gly
un
att
ractive
fo
r sho
rt jou
rne
ys w
he
n c
om
pa
red
to
alte
rna
tive
s w
ill
pa
ren
ts b
egin
to
cha
nge
the
ir t
rave
l ch
oic
es.
E&
EB
C m
an
age
pa
rkin
g
enfo
rcem
en
t.
The
Co
un
ty C
ou
ncil
Ca
bin
et
ha
s r
ecen
tly a
pp
rove
d a
ne
w “
Ro
ad
Safe
ty O
uts
ide
Sch
oo
ls”
po
licy.
The
pu
rpo
se o
f th
is p
olic
y is t
o s
et
out
the
pro
ce
ss t
ha
t w
ill b
e u
se
d b
y S
urr
ey
Co
un
ty C
ou
ncil
for
inve
stiga
tin
g a
nd
re
sp
on
din
g t
o c
on
ce
rns a
bou
t ro
ad
safe
ty
ou
tsid
e s
ch
oo
ls. T
he
aim
is t
o r
edu
ce
th
e r
isk o
f co
llisio
ns, a
nd
to m
ake
the
ro
ad
fee
l safe
r in
ord
er
to im
pro
ve
th
e a
ttra
ctive
ne
ss o
f w
alk
ing a
nd
cyclin
g t
o a
nd
fro
m
sch
oo
ls.
With
in S
urr
ey d
ecis
ions o
ve
r m
ost h
igh
wa
y m
att
ers
in
clu
din
g s
ett
ing s
pe
ed
lim
its
are
de
lega
ted t
o lo
ca
l co
mm
itte
es o
f e
lecte
d c
ou
nty
co
un
cil
and
bo
rou
gh
/dis
tric
t
co
un
cill
ors
. T
he
cou
nty
co
un
cil'
s n
ew
sp
ee
d lim
it p
olic
y h
igh
ligh
ts t
ha
t th
ere
is
gre
ate
r e
ncou
rage
me
nt fr
om
ce
ntr
al go
ve
rnm
en
t fo
r lo
ca
l a
uth
oritie
s t
o in
trod
uce
mo
re 2
0 m
ph
sche
me
s (
limits a
nd
zo
ne
s)
in u
rba
n a
rea
s a
nd
bu
ilt-u
p v
illa
ge
str
ee
ts th
at a
re p
rim
arily
re
sid
en
tia
l, t
o e
nsu
re g
rea
ter
safe
ty f
or
pede
str
ian
s a
nd
cyclis
ts.
EE
40
Re
ce
ive
d v
ia
em
ail
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
2. T
RA
FF
IC S
PE
ED
S
A w
ell
reco
gn
ise
d d
ete
rre
nt
to c
yclin
g. W
e w
ou
ld lik
e to
se
e a
mu
ch
mo
re r
igid
enfo
rcem
ent
of
sp
eed
lim
its a
nd
the
in
tro
du
ction
of
a
bo
rou
gh
wid
e 2
0 m
ph
lim
it f
or
all
resid
entia
l are
as a
nd
aro
und
scho
ols
.
Sp
eed
enfo
rcem
en
t is
th
e r
esp
on
sib
ility
of
Surr
ey P
olic
e.
20m
ph lim
its a
re o
nly
fea
sib
le w
he
n t
raff
ic s
pe
ed
s a
re a
lrea
dy c
om
me
nsu
rate
with
th
e p
rop
osed
20m
ph
limit,
and
th
ere
fore
achie
ve
no
thin
g.
20m
ph
zo
ne
s in
vo
lve
exp
en
siv
e (
an
d o
fte
n
un
po
pu
lar)
tra
ffic
ca
lmin
g.
Th
ese a
re g
ene
rally
re
se
rve
d f
or
sig
hts
wh
ere
th
e
ca
su
alty h
isto
ry ju
stifies t
he
mea
su
res.
Re
sid
en
tia
l a
rea
s a
re a
lre
ad
y m
uch
mo
re c
ycle
-frie
nd
ly t
ha
n th
e b
oro
ugh
’s m
ain
roa
ds.
It
is th
e m
ain
roa
ds w
he
re w
e n
eed
to
fo
cu
s a
tten
tion
on c
ycle
pro
vis
ion
.
EE
41
Re
ce
ive
d v
ia
em
ail
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
3.
ST
ON
EL
EIG
H &
EW
ELL E
AS
T S
TA
TIO
NS
We a
ssum
e f
rom
th
e n
um
be
r of
cycle
s n
ow
pa
rke
d w
he
re n
ew
sh
elte
red
an
d s
ma
rt c
ycle
sta
nd
s h
ave
be
en
in
sta
lled (
Ew
ell
We
st
an
d
ne
arb
y a
t A
sh
tea
d, B
oo
kh
am
an
d W
orc
este
r P
ark
) th
at cyclin
g t
o a
nd
from
Sta
tion
s h
as r
ep
lace
d s
om
e lifts
to
Sta
tio
ns. W
e n
ote
th
e p
oo
r
facili
tie
s a
t S
ton
ele
igh
an
d lim
ite
d a
ccom
mo
da
tio
n a
t E
we
ll E
ast, a
nd
ne
w s
tan
ds a
re n
eed
ed
to
en
co
ura
ge
mo
da
l sh
ift.
If t
he
re is s
pa
ce
an
d f
un
din
g w
e w
ou
ld g
lad
ly in
sta
ll m
ore
cycle
sta
nd
s.
Mo
re c
ycle
pa
rkin
g is in
clu
ded
as a
n a
sp
ira
tio
n in
Fo
rwa
rd P
rogra
mm
e (
sche
me
id 2
3 a
nd 2
4)
and
will
be
prio
ritise
d v
ia t
he
Lo
ca
l C
om
mitte
e.
ITEM 10
Page 186
13
EE
42
Re
ce
ive
d v
ia
em
ail
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
4.
CY
CL
E P
AR
KIN
G
Well
locate
d c
ycle
sta
nd
s s
eem
to
att
ract
so
me
add
itio
na
l cycle
co
mm
utin
g,
an
d d
esp
ite
som
e n
ew
sta
nd
s t
he
re a
re s
till
ga
ps in
pro
vis
ion
, e
.g.
Ep
so
m H
igh
Str
ee
t E
ast,
Ew
ell
Vill
age
.
If t
he
re is s
pa
ce
an
d f
un
din
g w
e w
ou
ld g
lad
ly in
sta
ll m
ore
cycle
sta
nd
s.
Ad
ditio
na
l
cycle
sta
nd
lo
catio
ns a
re b
ein
g c
on
sid
ere
d a
s p
art
of
Pla
n E
and
are
in
clu
ded
un
de
r a
nu
mb
er
of
sche
me
s in
th
e F
orw
ard
Pro
gra
mm
e;
de
cis
ion
fo
r
imp
lem
enta
tion
/de
live
ry w
ou
ld b
e v
ia t
he L
oca
l C
om
mitte
e
EE
43
Re
ce
ive
d v
ia
em
ail
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
5.
AD
VA
NC
ED
ST
OP
LIN
ES
All
Ju
nction
s s
ho
uld
have
Ad
va
nce
d S
top
Lin
es.
Insta
llin
g t
he
se
ind
iscrim
ina
tely
ma
y n
ot b
e the
be
st
so
lutio
n. I
t is
difficu
lt t
o
co
mm
en
t w
ith
in k
no
win
g w
ha
t th
e p
erc
eiv
ed
pro
ble
m is.
Agre
ed
tha
t im
pro
ve
d
cycle
fa
cili
tie
s a
re e
ssen
tia
l fo
r p
rom
otin
g m
oda
l sh
ift.
EE
44
Re
ce
ive
d v
ia
em
ail
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
6.
ST
ON
EL
EIG
H P
AR
K R
OA
D-B
RA
DF
OR
D D
RIV
E (
An
ne
x p
age
13
)
The
in
ab
ility
to
cycle
dire
ctly s
ou
thb
ou
nd
acro
ss t
he
A2
40
is a
dete
rre
nt
from
so
uth
of
the
A24
0 t
o S
tone
leig
h S
tatio
n, S
ch
oo
l a
nd
Bro
ad
wa
y
sh
op
s. W
e h
ave
to
po
int
ou
t th
at
wh
ile t
he
Deliv
ery
Sta
ge
is la
be
lled
'Sch
em
e Id
en
tifica
tion
', a
de
taile
d P
lan
, S
CC
Do
cu
me
nt 3
01
5/D
OC
/4 o
f
20
02
ha
s b
ee
n s
ho
wn
to
ou
r G
roup
. W
e r
eque
st
tha
t th
e S
ch
em
e b
e
mo
ve
d to
'Sho
rt-t
erm
' an
d th
e A
nn
ex b
e s
o a
me
nd
ed
.
Insta
llin
g a
cycle
ro
ute
fro
m S
tone
leig
h P
ark
Ro
ad
to
Bra
dfo
rd D
rive
ma
y b
e
fea
sib
le.
We w
ou
ld n
ee
d to
un
de
rta
ke
a d
eta
iled
fea
sib
ility
stu
dy,
ca
lcu
late
th
e
co
st,
an
d th
en
prio
ritise
aga
inst o
the
r d
em
and
s v
ia L
oca
l C
om
mitte
e.
EE
45
Re
ce
ive
d v
ia
em
ail
2 (
oth
er
tra
nsp
ort
pro
ble
ms)
EP
SO
M T
OW
N C
EN
TR
E
The
An
ne
x s
ch
em
es d
o n
ot
ad
dre
ss th
e p
rob
lem
of
tho
se jo
urn
eys t
o
an
d th
rou
gh
th
e T
ow
n C
en
tre
wh
ich
are
still
a d
ete
rre
nt
to c
yclin
g
be
cau
se
of
the
on
e-w
ay s
yste
m a
nd
th
e s
pe
ed
of
traff
ic in
Ash
ley
Ro
ad
. T
he
GL
C is r
ede
sig
nin
g a
nd
bu
ildin
g s
ch
em
es w
ith
re
allo
ca
tio
n
of
spa
ce
fo
r cyclis
ts a
nd
ped
estr
ian
s,
an
d o
nly
if
sim
ilar
sch
em
es a
re
de
sig
ne
d fo
r E
psom
To
wn
Ce
ntr
e w
ill O
bje
ctive
2 b
e m
et. O
bje
ctive
2
ne
ce
ssa
ry c
ycle
sch
em
es a
re:
A.
No
rthb
oun
d c
yclin
g a
lon
g A
sh
ley R
oa
d f
rom
Ro
seb
ery
Pa
rk
en
tra
nce
to
Sp
rea
d E
agle
Ju
nctio
n.
B.
Ea
st
Str
ee
t/U
pp
er
Hig
h S
tre
et d
ire
ctly t
hro
ugh
Hig
h S
tre
et E
ast an
d
Hig
h S
tre
et W
est to
Sou
th S
tre
et a
nd
West S
tre
et.
C. W
ate
rlo
o R
oa
d u
nde
r th
e r
ailw
ay b
rid
ge
.
Agre
ed
tha
t E
psom
Tow
n C
en
tre
gyra
tory
is a
n o
bsta
cle
to c
yclis
ts.
Pla
n E
is
loo
kin
g t
o p
rom
ote
ro
ute
s t
ha
t b
yp
ass th
e g
yra
tory
, w
hic
h w
ill s
erv
e t
hro
ugh
jou
rne
ys,
alb
eit c
ircu
itou
sly
, p
ut
no
t jo
urn
eys in
to o
r o
ut of
the t
ow
n c
en
tre
.
Re
allo
ca
tin
g s
pa
ce
to
cyclis
ts o
n t
he
gyra
tory
its
elf c
ou
ld o
nly
be
don
e a
t th
e c
ost
of
se
ve
re t
raff
ic c
on
gestio
n.
At
the
pre
sen
t tim
e th
is is u
nlik
ely
to
ga
in e
ith
er
po
pu
lar
or
po
litic
al su
pp
ort
.
EE
46
45
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
Re
pre
se
nta
tion
s to
the S
urr
ey C
ou
nty
Co
un
cil
Lo
ca
l T
ran
sp
ort
Pla
n
(LT
P3
) E
pso
m &
Ew
ell
LT
S: P
rop
ose
d K
iln L
an
e L
ink R
oa
d –
Im
pact
on
Non
su
ch
In
du
str
ial E
sta
te W
e w
rite
on
beh
alf o
f ou
r clie
nt
Pic
ton U
K
Re
al E
sta
te T
rust (P
rop
ert
y)
No
. 2
Lim
ite
d;
the
ow
ne
r of
Non
su
ch
Ind
ustr
ial E
sta
te. T
he
esta
te is c
urr
ently a
vib
ran
t bu
sin
ess lo
ca
tion
fully
occu
pie
d b
y 1
9 t
en
an
ts r
an
gin
g f
rom
lo
ca
l b
usin
esse
s to
na
tiona
l
blu
e c
hip
occu
pie
rs. W
e e
stim
ate
tha
t th
e e
sta
te c
urr
en
tly p
rovid
es in
the
re
gio
n o
f 2
00 jo
bs.
Kiln
Lan
e L
ink h
as fo
r m
an
y y
ea
rs b
een
an
asp
ira
tio
n o
f S
CC
an
d E
EB
C.
La
nd f
or
the
sch
em
e is s
afe
gu
ard
ed
in
th
e E
EB
C L
ocal P
lan
an
d h
as b
ee
n in
SC
C’s
Lo
ca
l
Tra
nsp
ort
Pla
n (
an
d p
recu
rso
r do
cum
ents
) s
ince
mid
19
90
’s. T
he s
ch
em
e
rece
ive
d P
rovis
ion
al F
un
din
g A
cce
pta
nce f
rom
Go
ve
rnm
ent
in 2
001 b
ut
wa
s p
ut
on
ho
ld fo
llow
ing a
ch
an
ge
in
Go
ve
rnm
en
t p
olic
y t
o f
ocu
s o
n R
egio
na
l H
ub
s.
The
re is n
ow
an
opp
ort
un
ity t
o s
ee
k C
2C
LE
P f
und
ing f
or
the
sche
me
and
as
su
ch
ha
s b
ee
n in
clu
ded
in
th
e C
2C
LE
P S
EP
. T
he s
ch
em
e h
as y
et
to r
ece
ive
co
nfirm
atio
n o
f fu
nd
ing b
ut S
CC
and
EE
BC
ha
ve
sta
rte
d to
ma
ke
earl
y c
on
tact
with
aff
ecte
d b
usin
esse
s.
SC
C/
EE
BC
off
ice
rs m
et
with
a r
ep
rese
nta
tive
fro
m P
icto
n P
rop
ert
ies o
n 2
5 J
un
e
20
14
to d
iscu
ss th
e s
ch
em
e a
nd
po
ten
tia
l is
su
es.
As s
uch t
his
fe
edb
ack is
we
lco
me
d.
ITEM 10
Page 187
14
EE
47
45
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
We c
on
sid
er
that
the
pro
po
sed
Kiln
La
ne
Lin
k R
oa
d s
ch
em
e is f
law
ed
,
an
d r
eco
gn
isin
g t
he
lik
ely
CP
O c
osts
is a
n u
ne
co
no
mic
wa
y o
f
ach
ievin
g t
he
Co
un
cil’
s a
ims a
s t
he
re w
ill b
e s
ign
ific
an
t d
isru
ption
to
loca
l b
usin
ess o
ccu
pie
rs f
rom
con
str
uctio
n o
f a
nd
op
era
tio
n o
f th
e n
ew
link.
Fu
rth
erm
ore
, th
e N
on
su
ch I
ndu
str
ial a
rea
is o
ne
of
the
mo
st
su
cce
ssfu
l sch
em
es w
ith
in P
icto
n’s
£4
50
m G
BP
po
rtfo
lio in t
erm
s o
f
occu
pie
r d
em
and
. W
e h
ave
gra
ve
co
nce
rns th
at
the
pro
po
sa
ls w
ou
ld
de
str
oy t
his
esta
blis
hed
and
pro
sp
ero
us b
usin
ess lo
ca
tio
n. In
add
itio
n,
we
are
pa
rtic
ula
rly c
on
ce
rne
d a
bo
ut th
e s
afe
ty issu
es a
risin
g f
rom
ha
vin
g a
pu
blic
hig
hw
ay r
un
nin
g t
hro
ugh
the
mid
dle
of
the e
sta
te.
The
ne
ed f
or
the
Kiln
La
ne
Lin
k h
as b
een
dem
on
str
ate
d th
rou
gh
a n
um
be
r of
me
cha
nis
ms.
It h
as f
or
man
y y
ea
rs b
ee
n in
clu
ded
in
SC
C’s
Lo
ca
l T
ran
sp
ort
Pla
n.
EE
BC
’s L
oca
l P
lan
and
fo
llow
ing t
he
sub
mis
sio
n o
f a
bu
sin
ess c
ase
to
Go
ve
rnm
ent
in 2
001
rece
ive
d P
rovis
ion
al F
und
ing A
cce
pta
nce
. T
he
bu
sin
ess
ca
se
sho
we
d a
po
sitiv
e e
con
om
ic b
en
efit
and
in
clu
de
d lan
d p
urc
hase
co
sts
.
In 2
00
4 t
he
sch
em
e p
asse
d th
rou
gh
an
exte
nsiv
e p
ub
lic c
on
su
lta
tion
wh
ich
rece
ive
d 8
3%
su
ppo
rt fo
r th
e s
ch
em
e.
If t
he
sche
me
re
ce
ive
s f
und
ing a
nd p
rogre
sses c
on
str
uctio
n p
ha
sin
g w
ou
ld b
e
co
nsid
ere
d to
min
imis
e d
isru
ption
to b
usin
esse
s.
The
po
ten
tia
l h
igh
wa
y r
ou
te r
un
nin
g t
hro
ugh
th
e N
on
su
ch
In
du
str
ial E
sta
te a
nd
resu
ltin
g issu
es w
as d
iscu
sse
d a
t th
e m
ee
ting o
n 2
5 J
une
20
14.
SC
C w
ill g
ive
the
se c
on
ce
rns fu
rth
er
co
nsid
era
tio
n a
s p
art
of
the d
eve
lopm
en
t of
the
sch
em
e.
EE
48
45
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
Fu
rth
er
to t
he
ab
ove
an
d fo
llow
ing a
n in
hou
se
re
vie
w,
we
als
o h
ave
a
nu
mb
er
of
qu
estion
s w
hic
h w
e c
on
sid
er
ne
ed
to
be
an
sw
ere
d b
efo
re
we
ca
n f
orm
alis
e o
ur
po
sitio
n w
ith
re
ga
rd t
o th
e p
rop
osa
ls. T
he
se
are
ou
tlin
ed
be
low
: 1
. P
lease
co
nfirm
wh
eth
er
an
y o
the
r p
ote
ntia
l ro
ute
s fo
r th
e lin
k h
ave
be
en
co
nsid
ere
d?
Fo
r e
xa
mp
le a
n a
lte
rna
tive
(sh
ort
er)
ro
ute
fo
llow
ing t
he
line
of
Fe
lste
ad
Roa
d w
ou
ld s
ee
m t
o r
equ
ire
sig
nific
an
tly le
ss la
nd
to
be
acqu
ire
d,
less infr
astr
uctu
re w
ork
, a
nd
wo
uld
als
o in
vo
lve
mu
ch
le
ss
dis
rup
tio
n t
o lo
ca
l o
ccup
iers
.
Alte
rna
tive
ro
ute
s fo
r th
e K
iln L
an
e L
ink s
chem
e w
ere
co
nsid
ere
d a
s p
art
of
the
20
01
bu
sin
ess c
ase
and
as a
re
su
lt o
f th
e 2
004
pub
lic c
on
su
lta
tion
. A
s a
re
su
lt o
f
the
latt
er
the
rou
te w
as a
me
nde
d to
th
at a
pp
rove
d b
y t
he
Lo
ca
l C
om
mitte
e in
20
04
.
A r
ou
te f
ollo
win
g t
he
lin
e o
f F
els
tea
d R
oa
d w
as c
on
sid
ere
d b
ut
this
wo
uld
ha
ve
resu
lte
d in
the
Com
pu
lso
ry P
urc
ha
se
of W
ilson
s w
hic
h w
as c
on
sid
ere
d
un
aff
ord
ab
le. In
ad
ditio
n it
ma
y n
ot b
e p
ossib
le w
ith
th
at a
lign
men
t to
tie
into
th
e
sid
e r
oad
s –
Ble
nh
eim
Ro
ad
an
d K
iln L
an
e (
tow
ard
s D
age
nh
am
Moto
rs).
EE
49
45
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
2.
Ple
ase
co
nfirm
wh
eth
er
the
fun
din
g b
ud
ge
t (e
stim
ate
d a
t £
22m
) ha
s
fully
acco
un
ted
fo
r la
nd
acqu
isitio
n/C
PO
co
sts
.
Ye
s t
he
cu
rren
t bu
dge
t of
£2
2m
in
clu
de
s fo
r la
nd
acq
uis
itio
n/C
PO
co
sts
.
EE
50
45
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
3.
Ple
ase
co
nfirm
wh
eth
er
the
cu
rre
nt
pro
po
sa
ls m
ee
t a
ll d
esig
n
sta
nda
rds fo
r h
igh
wa
y d
esig
n. T
his
is a
co
ncern
giv
en
th
e h
igh
vo
lum
e
of
exp
ecte
d H
GV
mo
ve
men
ts a
lon
g t
he
ro
ute
.
Ye
s t
he
cu
rren
t p
rop
osa
ls a
re to
cu
rre
nt
de
sig
n s
tan
da
rds.
EE
51
45
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
4.
Ha
s a
tra
nsp
ort
co
nsu
lta
nt a
pp
rais
ed t
he
he
alth
an
d s
afe
ty
imp
lica
tion
s o
f lo
ad
ing a
nd
un
loa
din
g o
n t
he
re
vis
ed
ro
ad
la
yo
ut?
No
t a
t th
is t
ime
.
EE
52
45
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
5.
Ple
ase
co
nfirm
wh
eth
er
a d
eta
iled
co
st
be
nefit
an
aly
sis
ha
s b
ee
n
un
de
rta
ken
, an
d if
so
ca
n th
is b
e r
ele
ase
d?
Ye
s t
his
wa
s u
nd
ert
ake
n a
s p
art
of
the
bu
sin
ess c
ase s
ubm
issio
n a
nd
Pro
vis
ion
al
Acce
pta
nce in
20
01
.
SC
C a
re c
urr
ently in
dis
cu
ssio
n w
ith
th
e C
2C
LE
P a
s to
wh
eth
er
this
bu
sin
ess
ca
se
ne
ed
s t
o b
e r
evis
ed
an
d u
pda
ted
to
ta
ke a
cco
un
t of
cu
rre
nt
gu
ida
nce
and
cu
rre
nt
estim
ate
d c
ost.
As s
uch
th
e b
usin
ess c
ase
can
not
be
re
lea
sed
at th
is t
ime
.
EE
53
45
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
6.
Ple
ase
co
nfirm
if
any f
urt
he
r a
na
lysis
ha
s b
een
und
ert
ake
n t
o
su
ppo
rt t
he
bu
sin
ess c
ase
fo
r th
e p
rop
osa
ls,
if s
o c
an
th
is b
e r
ele
ase
d?
Ye
s.
Th
is h
as in
vo
lve
d a
n a
sse
ssm
ent
of
the
po
ten
tia
l im
pro
ve
men
t to
the
eco
no
my a
nd
po
ten
tia
l jo
b g
row
th (
this
in
vo
lve
d in
terv
iew
s w
ith
bu
sin
esse
s in
the
are
a b
y E
GM
Con
su
ltan
ts).
SC
C a
re c
urr
en
tly in
dis
cu
ssio
n w
ith
th
e C
2C
LE
P a
s
to w
he
the
r th
is b
usin
ess c
ase
ne
ed
s to
be r
evis
ed
an
d u
pda
ted
to t
ake
accou
nt of
this
econ
om
ic w
ork
and
to
ta
ke a
ccou
nt of
curr
en
t gu
ida
nce
an
d c
urr
en
t e
stim
ate
d
co
st.
ITEM 10
Page 188
15
EE
54
45
3 (
aim
s a
nd
ob
jective
s)
We w
ou
ld b
e g
rate
ful if y
ou
co
uld
re
sp
on
d to
th
e a
bo
ve
qu
estio
ns, a
nd w
ou
ld b
e h
ap
py t
o m
ee
t to
dis
cu
ss t
he
po
sitio
n fu
rthe
r
on
ce
th
e r
equ
isite
info
rma
tion
ha
s b
een
pro
vid
ed
. Y
ou
rs s
ince
rely
Ma
tt
Hu
mph
reys T
urle
y
Te
l: 0
20
78
51 4
02
5
Em
ail:
matt
.hum
ph
reys@
turle
y.c
o.u
k
SC
C a
nd
EE
BC
we
lcom
e th
ese
ea
rly d
iscu
ssio
ns a
nd
wo
uld
loo
k t
o a
rra
nge
furt
he
r m
ee
tin
gs o
nce
th
e fu
nd
ing a
nd
bu
sin
ess c
ase
situ
ation
is k
no
wn
.
EE
55
45
4 (
oth
er
sch
em
es w
e
sh
ou
ld
co
nsid
er)
A m
ore
acce
pta
ble
altern
ative
th
at
doe
s n
ot
cre
ate
sig
nific
an
t ad
ve
rse
eff
ects
upo
n e
sta
blis
hed
lo
ca
l b
usin
esse
s.
SC
C t
o c
on
sid
er
alig
nm
ent/
route
op
tion
s in
clu
din
g t
hat
pro
po
se
d thro
ugh
th
e
No
nsu
ch I
ndu
str
ial E
sta
te a
s p
art
of
the d
eve
lop
me
nt of
the s
ch
em
e.
ITEM 10
Page 189
Page 190
This page is intentionally left blank