supplemental soil investigation
TRANSCRIPT
29, 39, & 43 Hospital Drive
Moose Factory, ON
Supplemental Soil
Investigation
PREPARED FOR:
Barry Bryan Associates
250 Water Street, Unit 201
Whitby, ON L1N 0G5
PREPARED BY:
PGL Environmental Consultants
250 Water Street, Unit 102
Whitby, ON L1N 0G5
PGL File: 3889-02.01
February 2018
Executive Summary
PGL Environmental Consultants (PGL) completed a Supplemental Soil Investigation at 29, 39, and 43 Hospital Drive in Moose Factory, Ontario (the Site). The Site is on federally owned lands near the Moose Factory water treatment plant. The investigation was completed for Barry Bryan Associates, to further delineate identified soil impacts for disposal purposes prior to demolishing existing buildings at Site.
The three properties are each developed with a single-storey, slab-on-grade structures. There are also separate outbuildings (garage/shop) on each property. There were five aboveground tanks (ASTs) for heating oil on the three properties: one at 29 Hospital Drive (tank system 1, TS1), two at 39 Hospital Drive (TS2), and two at 43 Hospital Drive (TS3). The ASTs were removed in October 2012.
PGL reviewed an AST removal and soil assessment report by KGS Group (January 2013). KGS conducted soil sampling on October 24, 2012, in the three TS areas near surficial staining. Twelve shallow soil samples were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and petroleum hydrocarbons fractions 1 to 4 (PHCs F1 to F4). Results were evaluated against the Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (CSQGs) for the protection of human health and environmental health and Canada Wide Standards (CWS) for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil, Tier 1, for residential/parkland land use (RL). There were shallow soil exceedances of benzene, toluene and PHC F1, F3, and F4. KGS recommended that an additional investigation be conducted to delineate soil and evaluate groundwater conditions for BTEX and PHC in the three TS areas.
PGL supervised the advancement of four test pits in each of the three TS areas in early November 2017. Soil samples were submitted for BTEX, PHC F1 to F4, and select samples for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Results were evaluated against CSQGs, CWS Tier 1, for RL. One soil sample was submitted for waste classification.
One soil sample (TP02) in TS1 exceeded the CWS Tier 1 RL standards for PHC F2 from a depth of 2.5m below ground surface. The remaining soil samples met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards. Soil samples were wet at 2.0m below ground surface within the test pits. Water seepage or sloughing-in of test pit sidewalls was not observed. Based on waste classification testing, the soil can be classified as non-hazardous and non-ignitable for the purpose of offsite disposal. Laboratory results should be provided to the receiving facility in advance for review and acknowledgment of acceptance of the soil.
Soil contamination in TS1 was delineated, excluding to the south due to the existing road. Soil contamination in TS2 was delineated excluding to the west side of the building, where the partially collapsed building, debris, vegetation, and snow cover prevented sampling. Soil contamination in TS3 was delineated.
There may be impacted groundwater in the vicinity of the identified soil impacts. Groundwater was not investigated in this program, it was not part of the scope, as directed by client request due to time constraints. If groundwater is being managed during the demolition, it should be assumed to be contaminated for handling purposes or it could be tested through installing monitoring wells.
During demolition, building slabs, footings, and soil should be monitored for PHC impacts and segregated for disposal, as needed. Additional soil investigations under the buildings maybe required based on these observations. It may be advisable to have an environmental consultant onsite to assist with these tasks.
This Executive Summary is subject to the same standard limitations as contained in the report and must be read in conjunction with the entire report.
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Health and Safety Plan ........................................................................................... 2
3.2 Site Clearances ...................................................................................................... 3
3.3 Test Pitting and Sampling ....................................................................................... 3
3.4 Site Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................................... 3
4.0 Investigation Results ........................................................................................................ 4
4.1 Field Observations .................................................................................................. 4
4.2 Soil Results and Evaluation .................................................................................... 5
4.2.1 Tank System 1 – 29 Hospital Drive ........................................................... 5
4.2.2 Tank System 2 – 39 Hospital Drive ........................................................... 5
4.2.3 Tank System 3 – 43 Hospital Drive ........................................................... 5
4.2.4 Waste Characterization ............................................................................. 5
4.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Summary ......................................................... 6
5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................................. 6
6.0 Standard Limitations ......................................................................................................... 7
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Investigation Locations Figure 3a Soil Results – Former Tank System 1 Figure 3b Soil Results – Former Tank System 2 & 3
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Soil Results – Petroleum Hydrocarbons Table 2 Soil Results – Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Table 3 Soil Results – Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Borehole Logs Appendix 2 Laboratory Certificates of Analysis
List of Acronyms
AST - aboveground storage tanks
bgs - below ground surface
BTEX - benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes
CSQG - Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines
CWS - Canada Wide Standards
OVM - organic vapour meter
PAHs - polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
PGL - PGL Environmental Consultants
PHCs - petroleum hydrocarbons
PHCs - petroleum hydrocarbons
ppm - parts per million
QA/QC - quality assurance/quality control
RL - residential land use
RPD - relative percent difference
TP - Test Pit
TS - Tank System
Supplemental Soil Investigation February 2018 Barry Bryan Associates Page 1 PGL File: 3889-02.01
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Barry Bryan Associates (BBA) retained PGL Environmental Consultants (PGL) to conduct a Supplemental Soil Investigation at 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive in Moose Factory, Ontario (the Site).
The objective of the investigation was to delineate the extent of previously identified shallow soil impacts to assess soil quality for disposal as a part of the building demolition work.
1.1 Background
Moose Factory, Ontario is located on Moose Factory Island, approximately 16km south of James Bay, on the waters of the Moose River. The community of Moosonee is located on the mainland approximately 2km to the northwest of Moose Factory. Transportation and access to the island is limited to boats (barge and water taxi), helicopters, and winter ice roads.
The Site is comprised of three addresses: 29, 39 and 43 Hospital Drive. Each property is developed with a single-storey, slab-on0grade structure. There are also separate outbuildings (garage/shop) on each property. There were five aboveground tanks (ASTs) that supplied #2 heating oil to oil-fired furnaces at the Site: one at 29 Hospital Drive (tank system 1, TS1), two at 39 Hospital Drive (TS2), and two at 43 Hospital Drive (TS3). The ASTs were removed in October 2012.
We understand the buildings are to be demolished, and that excavation of soil around the buildings is expected to be roughly: 0.3m below ground surface (bgs) at TS1, 0.45m bgs at TS2, and 0.15m bgs at TS3.
PGL reviewed an AST removal report by KGS Group (KGS), January 2013. KGS decommissioned and removed the below listed ASTs as a part of their work program.
Tank System (TS) Description
TS1 - 29 Hospital Drive (Garage)
• 1 exterior AST, 910L single-walled steel
• 1.5m from southeast corner of building
TS2 - 39 Hospital Drive (Former Carpentry Shop)
• 2 exterior ASTs, 1,135L single-walled steel
• 1.5m from south of exterior wall
TS3 - 43 Hospital Drive (Former Carpentry Shop)
• 2 exterior ASTs, 1,135L single-walled steel
• 10m east of carpentry shop
Surficial soil samples from 0.1m to 0.3m below ground surface (bgs) were collected in areas of staining. Results for the following parameters exceeded the applicable standards as follows:
• TS1: three soils were analyzed (MF-S1 to -S3). Benzene (S3) and toluene (S2) exceeded;
• TS2: five soils were analyzed (MF-S4 to -S8). Petroleum hydrocarbons (PHC) F1 (S8), PHC F3 (S4), and PHC F4 (S5) exceeded; and
Supplemental Soil Investigation February 2018 Barry Bryan Associates Page 2 PGL File: 3889-02.01
• TS3: four soils were analyzed (MF-S9 to -S12). PHC F1(S8), PCH F3 (S11) and PHC F4 (S13 duplicate of S9) exceeded.
KGS concluded impacts at all three-former tank exceeded both Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment and Tier 1 generic and site-specific criteria, and therefore, pose a risk to be human and/or ecological health. KGS recommended that an additional investigation be conducted to delineate soil and groundwater conditions for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylene (BTEX) and PHC fractions F1 to F4 in the three tank system areas.
Based on e-mail communication (November 3, 2017) with BBA and Public Service and Procurement Canada, the Site is owned by the Crown and future residential use was to be assumed. Additionally, PGL was instructed to only conduct soil testing and not groundwater as part of this scope, to meet the compressed project schedule.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
To meet the objective noted above, PGL:
1. Advanced four test pits at each of the three TS areas to a depth of 3m bgs (for a total of 12 test pits);
2. Sampled and logged soil during test pitting, and screened soils with an organic vapour meter (OVM);
3. Selected two soil samples per test pit for vertical delineation, for analysis based on field indicators of contamination (e.g., staining, odour, and field screening concentrations) and location relative to potential contaminant sources;
4. Submitted all soil samples for analysis of BTEX and PHCs F1 to F4;
5. One Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure composite sample was collected and analyzed for waste characterization of the Site. The sample was analyzed for leachable metals and inorganics, volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile organic compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, and ignitability; and
6. Submitted select samples for analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) due to historical use of #2 heating (fuel) oil at Site.
3.0 METHODOLOGY
PGL completed a soil investigation at the Site from November 7 to 9, 2017. The work was conducted consistent with PGL’s standard operating field procedures and applicable guidelines, standards, and regulations.
The investigation locations are presented on Figure 2.
3.1 Health and Safety Plan
PGL prepared a health and safety plan that included:
• A description of work;
• Job safety analysis procedures;
Supplemental Soil Investigation February 2018 Barry Bryan Associates Page 3 PGL File: 3889-02.01
• Emergency contact details and muster locations;
• Hospital contact information and a map to the hospital;
• Identification of first-aid representatives; and
• Daily tailgate meeting sheets.
Daily tailgate meetings were conducted each morning to discuss, as a minimum, safety topics, changes in Site conditions, and emergency procedures.
3.2 Site Clearances
BBA retained multiVIEW Locates to complete public and private utility locating prior to starting the intrusive investigations. To reduce the chance of striking underground utilities, investigation locations were electromagnetically swept for conductive utilities from November 7 to 9, 2017.
Some investigation locations were near aboveground utilities and conduits. PGL worked with the excavation operator to ensure appropriate distances were maintained from the utilities. No excavation work was completed within 3m of a utility pole or overhead wire.
3.3 Test Pitting and Sampling
BBA retained Brian Innes Construction to advance test pits using a rubber-tire backhoe. Test pit excavation was conducted on November 8 and 9, 2017. Twelve test pits (TP01 to TP12) were advanced to a maximum depth of 3.0m bgs; four in each of the three TS areas.
PGL logged soil stratigraphy and collected soil samples during excavation. Samples were collected from the backhoe bucket. Soil stratigraphy is presented on test pit logs provided in Appendix 1.
To field-screen soil samples for the presence of volatile organic vapours, portions of soil samples were collected and placed in polyethylene bags. Time was allowed for vapours to off-gas from the soil before an RKI Eagle, an OVM capable of measuring combustible organic vapour concentrations, was used to test headspace vapours in the sample bags. Headspace vapour concentrations are presented in the test pit logs (Appendix 1).
Soil samples were placed directly into laboratory-supplied glass jars and glass vials, and were kept cool prior to delivery to the laboratory. Samples for BTEX, and PHC F1 were collected in sample containers pre-charged with methanol preservative. Samples were selected for analysis based on the vapour readings, field observations (staining, odour etc.), location with respect to the risks identified in the 2013 KGS report, and planned scope of work. Samples were couriered to ALS Environmental (ALS) in Thunder Bay, Ontario.
3.4 Site Evaluation Criteria
The Site is under federal jurisdiction, therefore PGL assessed laboratory results using the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Canadian Environmental Guidelines dated 1999, update 7.0 and Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Canada Wide Standards for PHC dated May 2001, revised January 2008. Data from the previous investigations have been compared to these standards.
Supplemental Soil Investigation February 2018 Barry Bryan Associates Page 4 PGL File: 3889-02.01
Soil standards under the federal regime are based on site use and site location with respect to environmental and human receptors. The Site’s various addresses have different uses, including industrial, commercial, community, and residential. Previous investigations have assessed the Site as residential/parkland land use; this allows potential residential activities on the Site in the future. Based on e-mail communication with BBA and Public Service and Procurement Canada, future residential use was to be assumed for the Site. The applicable standards for this Site are therefore:
• Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (CSQGs) for the protection of human health and environmental health for residential/parkland use; and
• Canada Wide Standards (CWS) for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil, Tier 1, for residential/parkland land use (RL), where the standards are based on whether the soil is fine- or coarse-grained.
Grain-size analysis was not completed as part of the investigation. Field observations indicated a silty sand stratigraphy (i.e., coarse-textured soils).
Soil results are compared to the most stringent standards for both soil textures (coarse and fine).
4.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS
The investigation findings are presented in the following sections. PHC F2 exceeded the CWS Tier 1 RL standards at one location (TP02). All other soil samples submitted for analysis met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards. Soil results are presented in Table 1 (Petroleum Hydrocarbons), and Table 2 (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons). Test pit locations are shown on Figures 3a and 3b. Laboratory certificates of analysis are presented in Appendix 2.
4.1 Field Observations
The buildings in each of the three TS areas were dilapidated and the ground was snow covered.
Field observations during test pit excavation identified topsoil at ground surface at all twelve locations. Underlying the topsoil is the native silty sand to the maximum depth of investigation. Soil samples were wet in appearance at 2.0m bgs; indicative of the water table. Some odours were observed below 2.0m at TP02. Organic staining was observed in TP05, TP06, and TP07 below the water table.
No extraneous materials (e.g., bricks, glass, building debris) were noted during test pit excavation works. Test pit walls did not cave in during excavation and no groundwater seepage or sheen was observed within the test pits or on soil samples collected for screening. OVM readings were all observed to be less than 25 parts per million (ppm) hexane, and ranging between 0ppm and 23ppm isobutylene. Stratigraphy and field-screening measurements are presented on the borehole logs in Appendix 1.
Supplemental Soil Investigation February 2018 Barry Bryan Associates Page 5 PGL File: 3889-02.01
4.2 Soil Results and Evaluation
4.2.1 Tank System 1 – 29 Hospital Drive
One sample (TP02-05) marginally exceeded the CWS Tier 1 RL standards for PHC F2. All other soil samples submitted for analysis met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards.
The PHC F2 exceedance (TP02-05) was collected at 2.5m bgs from south of the former garage at 29 Hospital Drive. The exceedance is delineated at depth; TP02-06 at 3m bgs met the applicable standards. Lateral delineation further south and west was not possible due to the proximity of the roadway about 1.5m away. Lateral delineation to the east was achieved by TP03, roughly 12m away from TP02. A test pit could not be completed closer due to existing overhead lines and a utility pole. The PHC F2 result (168μg/g) marginally exceeds CWS Tier 1 RL coarse-grained standard of 150μg/g. Based on Site conditions, high water table and coarse-textured soils and distance of this sample from the former AST, groundwater contamination is suspected in this area.
This area is expected to be excavated to a depth of 0.3m bgs, which is much shallower than the depth of impacts (2.5m bgs).
4.2.2 Tank System 2 – 39 Hospital Drive
All soil samples submitted for analysis from this area met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards.
PGL was unable to fully delineate shallow impacts identified by KGS in their investigation due to debris within the building footprint, snow cover, and a high density of vegetation along the west side of the former building. The backhoe was unable to access the west side of the building to delineate the exceedance at MF-S6. The remaining exceedances have been delineated south and east.
This area is expected to be excavated to a depth of 0.45m bgs, which is slightly deeper than the depth of impacts identified by KGS.
4.2.3 Tank System 3 – 43 Hospital Drive
All soil samples submitted for analysis met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards. TS3 has been fully delineated laterally and at depth as shown on Figure 3b.
4.2.4 Waste Characterization
All results met Schedule 4 (Leachate Quality Criteria) of Ontario Regulation 558, and the soil is non-hazardous and non-ignitable. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure sample results are presented in Table 3.
Supplemental Soil Investigation February 2018 Barry Bryan Associates Page 6 PGL File: 3889-02.01
4.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Summary
A quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program was implemented as part of our work to:
• Confirm that field sampling methods and laboratory analyses were reliable;
• Ensure that the sampling methods produced representative samples of environmental media through the use of standard operating procedures; and
• Verify that the quality of reported results were suitable to support decisions and interpretation based on the data.
Quality assurance measures applicable to this report included:
• Data QA/QC reviews by designated personnel;
• Preferred use of electronically transferred data in all tables;
• Analysis of duplicate sample results and internal laboratory QA/QC; and
• Review of methodologies and procedures.
Precision, accuracy, representativeness, and completeness are addressed in the QA/QC program. There were no issues identified with our data or methodologies that affect the conclusions of this report.
Twenty-six soil samples, including two duplicate pairs, were collected and analyzed for BTEX and PHC F1-F4 fractions. Seven samples, including one duplicate pair, were collected and analyzed for PAHs. PGL calculated relative percent difference (RPD) values for all sample/duplicate pairs meet the screening criteria for all parameters tested, except for one sample-replicate pair (TP02-05/Z002). RPD values for this sample-replicate pair met the target for all parameters except for PHC F2. The PHC F2 RPD for TP02/Z001 is 74%, above the target RPD of 60%.
The sample-replicate pair was collected from silty sand with a slight hydrocarbon-like odour. Adequate sample splitting can be difficult with coarse soils (such as sands). An uneven distribution of fine material into the sample and replicate jars may have contributed to the high RPD value as PHCs tend to attach more easily to finer particles. Based on field observations of hydrocarbon odours, and the value for PHC F2 in the parent sample only just exceeding the standards, we do consider the higher value of the sample-replicate pair to still represent the soil quality. This does not significantly affect our conclusions about the extent of impacts observed at the Site.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
PGL conducted a Supplemental Soil Investigation for BBA, to delineate shallow hydrocarbon soil impacts in three areas at Site. The objective was to identify soil quality and the extent of impacts for the eventual disposal of soil as a part of building demolition work.
PGL supervised the advancement of 12 test pits at Site. Four test pits were completed in each of the three TS areas. Soil samples were analyzed for one or more of BTEX, PHCs, and PAHs. One soil sample (TP02), in TS1, exceeded the CWS Tier 1 RL standards for PHC F2. The remaining soil samples met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards.
Supplemental Soil Investigation February 2018 Barry Bryan Associates Page 7 PGL File: 3889-02.01
The following is a summary of the impacted areas:
Location Vertically Delineated Laterally Delineated
TS1
Yes. Maximum depth of impact at 2.5m bgs.
Clean samples at 3m bgs
Yes - North, east, and west.
Delineation not achieved to the south of TP02 due to existing roadway
TS2
Yes. Maximum depth of impact at 0.3m bgs.
Clean samples at 0.5m bgs
Yes – North, south, and east.
Delineation not achieved to the west where partially collapsed building, debris, vegetation and snow cover prevented sampling
TS3
Yes. Maximum depth of impact at 0.3m bgs.
Clean samples at 0.5m bgs
Yes - North, south, east, and west.
Excavated soil the soil is non-hazardous and non-ignitable and may be disposed of at an approved landfill. The laboratory results in Appendix 2 should be provided to the receiving facility in advance for review and acknowledgment of acceptance of the soil.
There may be impacted groundwater in the vicinity of the identified soil impacts. Groundwater was not investigated in this program, it was not part of the scope, as directed by the client. If groundwater is being managed during the demolition, it should be assumed to be contaminated for handling purposes or it could be tested through installing monitoring wells.
During demolition, building slabs, footings and soil should be monitored for PHC impacts and segregated for disposal, as needed. Additional soil investigations under the buildings maybe required based on these observations. It may be advisable to have an environmental consultant onsite to assist with these tasks.
6.0 STANDARD LIMITATIONS
PGL prepared this report for our client and its agents exclusively. PGL accepts no responsibility for any damages that may be suffered by third parties as a result of decisions or actions based on this report.
The report’s purpose is to provide the client with an assessment of contamination on the site. The investigation consisted of a screening for potential contamination and, as is true for all environmental investigations, potential remains for the presence of unknown, unidentified, or unforeseen surface or subsurface contamination. More or different investigation may be required if other risks are identified. The data presented in this report is valid for the date of sampling, but site conditions may change with time.
The findings and conclusions are site-specific and were developed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by environmental professionals currently practising under similar conditions in the area. Changing assessment techniques, regulations, and site conditions means that environmental investigations and their conclusions can quickly become dated, so this report is for use now. The report should not be used after that without PGL review/approval.
Supplemental Soil Investigation February 2018 Barry Bryan Associates Page 8 PGL File: 3889-02.01
The project has been conducted according to our instructions and work program. Additional conditions, and limitations on our liability are set forth in our work program/contract. This report is neither an endorsement nor a condemnation of the subject property. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
Respectfully submitted,
PGL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Per:
Salima Jaffer, B.Sc. Environmental Consultant
Kim Worboy, P.Eng., QPRA
Senior Environmental Consultant EAF/SAJ/KJW/slr M:\3800-3899\3889\02-01\r-3889-02-01-Phase 2-Feb18-Rev1.doc
Original in colour
±
0 0.5 10.25 km1:25,000±
0 40 8020 m1:2,000
Image: ESRI Base Imagery
NOV 2017
Date:
3889-02.01
File No.: Dwg No.:
38890201-11 DPL
Drawn by: FIGURE
1
SITE LOCATION29, 39, and 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
SITE
BARRY BRYAN ASSOCIATES
Q:\3800-3899\3889 - BBA\02.01 - Moose Factory\Graphics\38890201-11.mxd
Approximate Scale
Approximate Scale
C E N T E R R O A DSITE
HO
SP
I TA
L DR
I VE
TH
UR
ST
ON
ST
RE
ET
"
5
"
5"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5"
5
"
5
##*##*
##*
##*##*
##*
##*##*
##*
##*
##*
##*
TP04
MF-S6MF-S8
MF-S7
MF-S4MF-S5
MF-S12
MF-S11MF-S9
MF-S10
MF-S3 MF-S2MF-S1
GARAGE
SHED
OFFICEBUILDING
FIRE HALL
FORMER COMMUNITY HALL
FORMER WAREHOUSE/CARPENTRY SHOP
TP10TP09
TP11TP12
TP01
TP02 TP03
TP08
TP07TP06
TP05
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, andthe GIS User Community
"
5
Test Pit (PGL, 2017)
##* Historical Soil Sample (KGS, 2012)
Q:\3800-3899\3889 - BBA\02.01 - Moose Factory\Graphics\38890201-21.mxd
± 0 10 205 m1:600Approximate Scale
Original in colour
C E N T E R R O A DH
OS
PI T
AL D
RI V
E
Original in colour
Image: ESRI Base Imagery
DEC 2017
Date:
3889-02.01
File No.: Dwg No.:
38890201-21 DPL
Drawn by: FIGURE
2
INVESTIGATION LOCATIONS29, 39, and 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
BARRY BRYAN ASSOCIATES
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
##*##*
##*
##*##*
##*
##*##*
##*
##*
##*
##*
TP04
MF-S3MF-S2
MF-S1
GARAGE
SHED
OFFICEBUILDING
FIRE HALL
29 HOSPITAL DRIVE(TS 1)
TP01
TP02 TP03
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, andthe GIS User Community
"
5
Test Pit (PGL, 2017)
##* Historical Soil Sample (KGS, 2012)
Sample meets applicable Standards
Sample exceeds applicable Standards
Q:\3800-3899\3889 - BBA\02.01 - Moose Factory\Graphics\38890201-31A.mxd
± 0 5 102.5 m1:400Approximate Scale
Original in colour
C E N T E R R O A D
Original in colour
Image: ESRI Base Imagery
DEC 2017
Date:
3889-02.01
File No.: Dwg No.:
38890201-31A DPL
Drawn by: FIGURE
3a
SOIL RESULTS - FORMER TANK SYSTEM 129 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
BARRY BRYAN ASSOCIATES
"5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
"
5
##*##*
##*
##*##*
##*
##*##*
##*
##*
##*
##*
MF-S6
MF-S8MF-S7
MF-S4MF-S5
MF-S12
MF-S11 MF-S9
MF-S10FORMER WAREHOUSE/CARPENTRY SHOP
FORMER COMMUNITY HALL
FIRE HALL
39 HOSPITAL DRIVE(TS 2)
43 HOSPITAL DRIVE(TS 3)
TP10
TP09
TP11
TP12
TP08
TP07TP06
TP05
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, andthe GIS User Community
"
5
Test Pit (PGL, 2017)
##* Historical Soil Sample (KGS, 2012)
Sample meets applicable Standards
Sample exceeds applicable Standards
Q:\3800-3899\3889 - BBA\02.01 - Moose Factory\Graphics\38890201-31B.mxd
± 0 5 102.5 m1:400Approximate Scale
Original in colour
HO
SP
I TA
L DR
I VE
Original in colour
Image: ESRI Base Imagery
DEC 2017
Date:
3889-02.01
File No.: Dwg No.:
38890201-31B DPL
Drawn by: FIGURE
3b
SOIL RESULTS - FORMER TANK SYSTEM 2 & 339 and 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
BARRY BRYAN ASSOCIATES
Soil sample results are presented as ug/g (ppm) on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted
Z### Field duplicate sample
TP Test Pit
- Not analyzed
~ No Standard
m bgs Metres below ground surface
< Less than stated detection limit
CCME Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment
CWS Tier 1 Canada-wide standard for petroleum hydrocarbons in soil
CSQGCanadian Soil (or Sediment) Quality Guidelines for the protection of the environment and
human health
RL Residential Land Use
# Greater than applicable Standard
RDL Reportable Detection Limit
F1 (C6-C10) Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 1
F2 (C10-C16) Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 2
F3 (C16-C34) Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 3
F4 (C34-C50) Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 4
F1-BTEX Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 1 excluding benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and xylenes
F2-Naphth Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 2 excluding naphthalene
F3-PAH Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 3 excluding Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
B(a)P Total Potency
EquivalentBenzo(a)pyrene Total Potency Equivalent
Analytical Table Notes
Table 1
Soil Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons
29, 39, 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
Barry Bryan Associates, PGL File: 3889-02.01
Be
nze
ne
To
luen
e
Eth
ylb
en
ze
ne
Xy
len
e T
ota
l
F1
(C
6-C
10
)
F1
-BT
EX
F2
(C
10
-C1
6)
F3
(C
16
-C3
4)
F4
(C
34
-C5
0)
µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g
RDL 0.0068 0.08 0.01 0.05 5 5 10 50 50
CSQG RL Coarse Grained Surface Soil 0.03 0.37 0.082 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CSQG RL Fine Grained Surface Soil 0.0068 0.08 0.018 2.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CWS Tier 1 RL Coarse Grained Surface Soils ~ ~ ~ ~ 30 30 150 300 2800
CWS Tier 1 RL Coarse Grained Subsoils ~ ~ ~ ~ 30 30 150 2500 10000
CWS Tier 1 RL Fine Grained Subsoils ~ ~ ~ ~ 170 170 230 3500 10000
CWS Tier 1 RL Fine Grained Surface Soils ~ ~ ~ ~ 170 170 150 1300 5600
Sample Location Sample IDSample Depth
(m bgs)Sample Date
Analytical Report
Reference Number
TP01-02 1 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP01-05 2.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP02-05 2.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 168 <50 <50
Z001 (TP02-05) 2.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 77 <50 <50
TP02-06 3 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP03-03 1.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP03-06 3 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP04-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP04-04 2 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP05-04 2 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP05-06 3 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP06-03 1.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP06-05 2.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP07-01 0.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP07-05 2.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP08-02 1 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP08-06 3 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP09-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
Z002 (TP09-01) 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP09-04 2 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP10-02 1 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP10-05 2.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP11-03 1.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP11-06 3 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP12-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
TP12-05 2.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50
PHCs
TP01
TP02
TP03
TP04
TP11
TP12
TP05
TP06
TP07
TP08
TP09
TP10
PGL Environmental
December 2017
EAF/OGM t-3889-02-01-Dec17.xlsmTable 1
Page 1 of 1
Table 2
Soil Results - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
29, 39, 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
Barry Bryan Associates, PGL File: 3889-02.01
F2
-Na
ph
th
F3
-PA
H
Ac
en
ap
hth
en
e
Ac
en
ap
hth
yle
ne
Ac
rid
ine
An
thra
ce
ne
Be
nzo
(a)a
nth
rac
en
e
Be
nzo
(a)p
yre
ne
Be
nzo
(g,h
,i)p
ery
len
e
Be
nzo
(b)f
luo
ran
the
ne
Be
nzo
(k)f
luo
ran
the
ne
Ch
rys
en
e
Dib
en
zo
(a,h
)an
thra
ce
ne
Flu
ora
nth
en
e
Flu
ore
ne
Ind
en
o(1
,2,3
-cd
)py
ren
e
1-M
eth
yln
ap
hth
ale
ne
2-M
eth
yln
ap
hth
ale
ne
Na
ph
tha
len
e
Ph
en
an
thre
ne
Py
ren
e
Qu
ino
lin
e
IAC
R (
CC
ME
)
B(a
)P T
ota
l P
ote
nc
y E
qu
iva
len
t
µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g mg/kg mg/kg
RDL 10 50 0.05 0.05 0.8 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.46 0.15
CSQG RL Coarse Grained Surface Soil ~ ~ 0.28 320 ~ 2.5 1 0.6 ~ 1 1 6.2 1 15.4 0.25 1 ~ ~ 0.013 0.046 7.7 ~ 1 1
CSQG RL Fine Grained Surface Soil ~ ~ 0.28 320 ~ 2.5 1 0.6 ~ 1 1 6.2 1 15.4 0.25 1 ~ ~ 0.013 0.046 7.7 ~ 1 1
CWS Tier 1 RL Coarse Grained Surface Soils 150 300 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CWS Tier 1 RL Coarse Grained Subsoils 150 2500 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CWS Tier 1 RL Fine Grained Subsoils 230 3500 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CWS Tier 1 RL Fine Grained Surface Soils 150 1300 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Sample Location Sample IDSample Depth
(m bgs)Sample Date
Analytical Report
Reference Number
TP01 TP01-02 1 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15
TP04 TP04-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15
TP05 TP05-02 1 8-Nov-17 L2021558 - - <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15
TP07 TP07-01 0.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15
TP09-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15
Z002 (TP09-01) 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15
TP12 TP12-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15
Other PAH PAH
TP09
PGL Environmental
December 2017
EAF/OGM t-3889-02-01-Dec17.xlsmTable 2
Page 1 of 1
Table 3
Soil Results - Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
29, 39, 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
Barry Bryan Associates, PGL File: 3889-02.01
ABNs Other PAH PCB PHCs
Nit
rite
/nit
rate
as
N f
or
R5
58
2,4
-Din
itro
tolu
en
e
Pen
tach
loro
ph
en
ol
2,4
-dic
hlo
rop
hen
ol
2,4
,5-t
rich
loro
ph
en
ol
2,4
,6-t
rich
loro
ph
en
ol
2,3
,4,6
-tetr
ach
loro
ph
en
ol
Hexach
loro
ben
zen
e
Hexach
loro
bu
tad
ien
e
Hexach
loro
eth
an
e
3-&
4-m
eth
ylp
hen
ol
Aro
ch
lor
1242
Aro
ch
lor
1248
Aro
ch
lor
1254
Aro
ch
lor
1260
PC
Bs
(S
um
of
tota
l)
Ben
zen
e
pH
(F
inal)
pH
(In
itia
l)
Flu
ori
de
Cyan
ide (
WA
D)
Ars
en
ic
Bari
um
Bo
ron
(B
), A
vailab
le
Cad
miu
m
Ch
rom
ium
Lead
Me
rcu
ry
Sele
niu
m
Sil
ve
r
Ura
niu
m
mg/l µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L pH_Units pH_Units µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
RDL 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 10 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 20 0.1 0.1 10000 100 50 500 2500 5 50 50 0.1 20 5 250
O. Reg. 347 Amendment 558 - Schd 4 1000 130 6000 90000 400000 500 10000 130 500 3000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 300 500 ~ ~ 150000 ~ 2500 100000 500000 500 5000 5000 100 1000 5000 10000
Sample Location Sample Date
TCLP 8-Nov-17 <4 <4 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <4 <4 <4 <10 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.4 <25 5.54 9.23 <10,000 <100 <50 <500 <2500 <5 <50 <50 <0.1 <25 <5 <250
Chlorophenols OC Pesticides Other PCB Physical Inorganics Metals
PGL Environmental
December 2017
jdb/OGM t-3889-02-01-Dec17.xlsmTable 3
Page 1 of 2
Table 3
Soil Results - Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
29, 39, 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
Barry Bryan Associates, PGL File: 3889-02.01
RDL
O. Reg. 347 Amendment 558 - Schd 4
Sample Location Sample Date
TCLP 8-Nov-17
2-m
eth
ylp
hen
ol
Ben
zo
(a)p
yre
ne
Cre
so
l T
ota
l
Carb
on
tetr
ach
lori
de
Ch
loro
ben
zen
e
1,1
-Dic
hlo
roeth
yle
ne
Ch
loro
form
1,2
-Dic
hlo
rob
en
zen
e
1,4
-Dic
hlo
rob
en
zen
e
1,2
-Dic
hlo
roeth
an
e
Me
thy
l E
thy
l K
eto
ne
Meth
yle
ne C
hlo
rid
e
Tetr
ach
loro
eth
yle
ne
Tri
ch
loro
eth
yle
ne
Vin
yl
Ch
lori
de
Nit
rob
en
zen
e
µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
5 0.2 10 20 20 20 100 20 20 20 1000 500 20 20 50 4
200000 1 200000 500 8000 1400 10000 20000 500 500 200000 5000 3000 5000 200 2000
<5 <0.2 <15 <25 <25 <25 <100 <25 <25 <25 <1000 <500 <25 <25 <50 <4
PAH VOC
PGL Environmental
December 2017
jdb/OGM t-3889-02-01-Dec17.xlsmTable 3
Page 2 of 2
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
fine to medium grained, trace oxidation below 1.0 m
wet below 2.0 m
grey below 2.5 m
increased silt content below 3.0 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS1 - 29 Hospital Drive
TP01-01
TP01-02:PAHPHC/BTEX
TP01-03
TP01-04
TP01-05:PHC/BTEX
TP01-06
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 8, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP01
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
wet below 2.0 m
diesel odour below 2.5 m
coarse grained below 3.0 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS1 - 29 Hospital Drive
TP02-01
TP02-02
TP02-03
TP02-04(Z001):PHC/BTEX
TP02-05:PHC/BTEX
TP02-06:PHC/BTEX
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 8, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP02
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
1
23
1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
wet below 2.5 m
coarse grained, some oxidation below 3.0 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS1 - 29 Hospital Drive
TP03-01
TP03-02
TP03-03:PHC/BTEX
TP03-04
TP03-05
TP03-06:PHC/BTEX
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 8, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP03
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
wet below 2.0 m
coarse grained below 3.0 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS1 - 29 Hospital Drive
TP04-01:PAHPHC/BTEX
TP04-02
TP04-03
TP04-04:PHC/BTEX
TP04-05
TP04-06
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 9, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP04
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
wet below 2.0 m
trace grey with dark staining below 2.5 m
some oxidation, trace coarse grained sand below 3.0 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS2 - 39 Hospital Drive
TP05-01
TP05-02:PAH
TP05-03
TP05-04:PHC/BTEX
TP05-05
TP05-06:PHC/BTEX
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 8, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP05
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
wet, grey with black organic staining below 2.0 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS2 - 39 Hospital Drive
TP06-01
TP06-02
TP06-03:PHC/BTEX
TP06-04
TP06-05:PHC/BTEX
TP06-06
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 8, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP06
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
wet below 2.0 m
grey, trace black organic staining below 2.5 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS2 - 39 Hospital Drive
TP07-01:PAHPHC/BTEX
TP07-02
TP07-03
TP07-04
TP07-05:PHC/BTEX
TP07-06
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 8, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP07
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, trace roots, brown, moist
no rootlets below 1.0 m
wet below 2.0 m
trace coarse grained sand, trace oxidation below 2.5 m
grey below 3.0 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS2 - 39 Hospital Drive
TP08-01
TP08-02:PHC/BTEX
TP08-03
TP08-04
TP08-05
TP08-06:PHC/BTEX
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 8, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP08
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
wet below 2.0 m
grey below 2.5 m
coarse grained, brown below 3.0 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS3 - 43 Hospital Drive
TP09-01(Z002):PAHPHC/BTEX
TP09-02
TP09-03
TP09-04:PHC/BTEX
TP09-05
TP09-06
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 9, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP09
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
wet below 2.0 m
grey, coarse grained, some oxidation below 2.5 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS3 - 43 Hospital Drive
TP10-01
TP10-02:PHC/BTEX
TP10-03
TP10-04
TP10-05:PHC/BTEX
TP10-06
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 9, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP10
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
wet below 2.0 m
coarse grained, grey below 2.5 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS3 - 43 Hospital Drive
TP11-01
TP11-02
TP11-03:PHC/BTEX
TP11-04
TP11-05
TP11-06:PHC/BTEX
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 9, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP11
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
TOPSOIL
Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist
wet below 2.0 m
coarse grained below 2.5 m
End of test pit at 3.00 mTS3 - 43 Hospital Drive
TP12-01:PAHPHC/BTEX
TP12-02
TP12-03
TP12-04
TP12-05:PHC/BTEX
TP12-06
Sample Notes Grab Sample
Page 1 of 1
INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator
INVESTIG. DATE: November 9, 2017
LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):
SO
IL T
YP
E
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
m)
PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01
THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.
TP12
TEST PIT NO:
SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a
TEST PIT RECORDD
EP
TH
(m
)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates
PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON
PG
L M
ULT
I-T
ES
T V
AP
OR
LO
G 2
015
388
9-02
.01.
GP
J P
GL_
DF
_ST
D_2
0160
225.
GD
T
12/1
1/17
LAB
OR
AT
OR
YA
NA
LYS
ES
VAPOUR READING (ppmv)
PID READING (ppmv)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
SA
MP
LE T
YP
E
[This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.]
13-NOV-17
Lab Work Order #: L2021558
Date Received:Pottinger Gaherty Environmental
102 - 250 Water StreetWhitby ON L1N 0G5
ATTN: Salima JafferFINAL REV. 224-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)Report Date:
Version:
Certificate of Analysis
ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
____________________________________________
Mathy MahadevaAccount Manager
ADDRESS: 95 West Beaver Creek Road, Unit 1, Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1H2 Canada | Phone: +1 905 881 9887 | Fax: +1 905 881 8062
Client Phone: 905-668-4908
ADDITIONAL 13-NOV-17 11:55Comments:
MOOSE FACTORY ISLAND-PGL 3889-02.01Job Reference: NOT SUBMITTEDProject P.O. #:
C of C Numbers:Legal Site Desc:
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
2PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17
TP01-02 TP01-05 TP02-05 TP02-06 TP03-03
L2021558-1 L2021558-2 L2021558-3 L2021558-4 L2021558-5
12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
% Moisture (%)
Benzene (ug/g)
Ethylbenzene (ug/g)
Toluene (ug/g)
o-Xylene (ug/g)
m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)
Xylenes (Total) (ug/g)
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (%)
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (%)
F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)
F1-BTEX (ug/g)
F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)
F2-Naphth (ug/g)
F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)
F3-PAH (ug/g)
F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)
Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C50) (ug/g)
Chrom. to baseline at nC50
Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride (%)
Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (%)
Acenaphthene (ug/g)
Acenaphthylene (ug/g)
Acridine (ug/g)
Anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/g)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (ug/g)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Chrysene (ug/g)
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene (ug/g)
Fluoranthene (ug/g)
Fluorene (ug/g)
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (ug/g)
1-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
17.6 23.5 11.5 10.2 18.4
<0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068
<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018
<0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030
<0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050
100.7 95.5 107.8 101.7 102.1
102.5 98.2 104.0 100.9 104.4
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
<10 <10 168 <10 <10
<10
<50 <50 <50 <50 <50
<50
<50 <50 <50 <50 <50
<72 <72 168 <72 <72
YES YES YES YES YES
80.8 81.6 84.0 81.2 79.5
91.9 87.3 98.4 86.9 87.7
<0.050
<0.050
<0.80
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
Physical Tests
Volatile Organic Compounds
Hydrocarbons
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
3PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL08-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17
TP03-06 TP04-01 TP04-04 TP05-02 TP05-04
L2021558-6 L2021558-7 L2021558-8 L2021558-9 L2021558-10
12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
% Moisture (%)
Benzene (ug/g)
Ethylbenzene (ug/g)
Toluene (ug/g)
o-Xylene (ug/g)
m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)
Xylenes (Total) (ug/g)
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (%)
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (%)
F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)
F1-BTEX (ug/g)
F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)
F2-Naphth (ug/g)
F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)
F3-PAH (ug/g)
F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)
Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C50) (ug/g)
Chrom. to baseline at nC50
Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride (%)
Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (%)
Acenaphthene (ug/g)
Acenaphthylene (ug/g)
Acridine (ug/g)
Anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/g)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (ug/g)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Chrysene (ug/g)
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene (ug/g)
Fluoranthene (ug/g)
Fluorene (ug/g)
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (ug/g)
1-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
19.6 15.4 8.86 20.1 19.9
<0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068
<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018
<0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030
<0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050
95.0 126.6 102.3 97.0
98.2 126.6 105.9 100.9
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10
<50 <50 <50 <50
<50
<50 <50 <50 <50
<72 <72 <72 <72
YES YES YES YES
82.2 87.4 84.7 84.5
85.4 117.2 82.5 92.8
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.80 <0.80
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.020 <0.020
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.020 <0.020
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050 <0.050
Physical Tests
Volatile Organic Compounds
Hydrocarbons
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
4PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17
TP05-06 Z001 TP06-03 TP06-05 TP07-01
L2021558-11 L2021558-12 L2021558-13 L2021558-14 L2021558-15
12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
% Moisture (%)
Benzene (ug/g)
Ethylbenzene (ug/g)
Toluene (ug/g)
o-Xylene (ug/g)
m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)
Xylenes (Total) (ug/g)
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (%)
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (%)
F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)
F1-BTEX (ug/g)
F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)
F2-Naphth (ug/g)
F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)
F3-PAH (ug/g)
F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)
Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C50) (ug/g)
Chrom. to baseline at nC50
Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride (%)
Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (%)
Acenaphthene (ug/g)
Acenaphthylene (ug/g)
Acridine (ug/g)
Anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/g)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (ug/g)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Chrysene (ug/g)
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene (ug/g)
Fluoranthene (ug/g)
Fluorene (ug/g)
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (ug/g)
1-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
17.8 11.4 17.9 23.1 16.8
<0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068
<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018
<0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030
<0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050
91.5 100.8 95.5 86.8 93.3
94.1 104.7 98.5 90.3 96.5
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
<10 77 <10 <10 <10
<10
<50 <50 <50 <50 <50
<50
<50 <50 <50 <50 <50
<72 77 <72 <72 <72
YES YES YES YES YES
84.4 97.2 82.4 82.3 85.2
83.3 86.7 84.2 73.5 84.4
<0.050
<0.050
<0.80
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
Physical Tests
Volatile Organic Compounds
Hydrocarbons
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
5PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17
TP07-05 TP08-02 TP08-06 TP09-01 TP09-04
L2021558-16 L2021558-17 L2021558-18 L2021558-19 L2021558-20
12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
% Moisture (%)
Benzene (ug/g)
Ethylbenzene (ug/g)
Toluene (ug/g)
o-Xylene (ug/g)
m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)
Xylenes (Total) (ug/g)
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (%)
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (%)
F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)
F1-BTEX (ug/g)
F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)
F2-Naphth (ug/g)
F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)
F3-PAH (ug/g)
F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)
Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C50) (ug/g)
Chrom. to baseline at nC50
Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride (%)
Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (%)
Acenaphthene (ug/g)
Acenaphthylene (ug/g)
Acridine (ug/g)
Anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/g)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (ug/g)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Chrysene (ug/g)
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene (ug/g)
Fluoranthene (ug/g)
Fluorene (ug/g)
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (ug/g)
1-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
20.3 7.53 18.6 17.5 15.2
<0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068
<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018
<0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030
<0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050
92.3 100.4 101.0 99.8 103.4
95.5 104.8 104.1 102.0 109.2
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10
<50 <50 <50 <50 <50
<50
<50 <50 <50 <50 <50
<72 <72 <72 <72 <72
YES YES YES YES YES
87.2 82.9 84.9 81.6 85.0
84.0 85.1 89.2 91.8 86.1
<0.050
<0.050
<0.80
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
Physical Tests
Volatile Organic Compounds
Hydrocarbons
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
6PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17
TP10-02 TP10-05 TP11-03 Z002 TP11-06
L2021558-21 L2021558-22 L2021558-23 L2021558-24 L2021558-25
12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
% Moisture (%)
Benzene (ug/g)
Ethylbenzene (ug/g)
Toluene (ug/g)
o-Xylene (ug/g)
m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)
Xylenes (Total) (ug/g)
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (%)
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (%)
F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)
F1-BTEX (ug/g)
F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)
F2-Naphth (ug/g)
F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)
F3-PAH (ug/g)
F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)
Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C50) (ug/g)
Chrom. to baseline at nC50
Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride (%)
Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (%)
Acenaphthene (ug/g)
Acenaphthylene (ug/g)
Acridine (ug/g)
Anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/g)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (ug/g)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Chrysene (ug/g)
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene (ug/g)
Fluoranthene (ug/g)
Fluorene (ug/g)
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (ug/g)
1-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
18.1 14.6 17.6 16.9 21.5
<0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068
<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018
<0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030
<0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050
88.2 107.9 103.1 106.1 89.3
92.1 105.6 101.6 104.1 93.7
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10
<50 <50 <50 <50 <50
<50
<50 <50 <50 <50 <50
<72 <72 <72 <72 <72
YES YES YES YES YES
81.0 78.0 76.1 73.9 81.9
75.3 103.0 98.6 98.7 87.3
<0.050
<0.050
<0.80
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
Physical Tests
Volatile Organic Compounds
Hydrocarbons
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
VOCJ
VOCJ
VOCJ
VOCJ
VOCJ
VOCJ
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
7PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17
TP12-01 TP12-05
L2021558-26 L2021558-27
12:00 12:00
% Moisture (%)
Benzene (ug/g)
Ethylbenzene (ug/g)
Toluene (ug/g)
o-Xylene (ug/g)
m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)
Xylenes (Total) (ug/g)
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (%)
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (%)
F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)
F1-BTEX (ug/g)
F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)
F2-Naphth (ug/g)
F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)
F3-PAH (ug/g)
F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)
Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C50) (ug/g)
Chrom. to baseline at nC50
Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride (%)
Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (%)
Acenaphthene (ug/g)
Acenaphthylene (ug/g)
Acridine (ug/g)
Anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)anthracene (ug/g)
Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/g)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (ug/g)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (ug/g)
Chrysene (ug/g)
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene (ug/g)
Fluoranthene (ug/g)
Fluorene (ug/g)
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (ug/g)
1-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)
18.1 17.6
<0.0068 <0.0068
<0.018 <0.018
<0.080 <0.080
<0.020 <0.020
<0.030 <0.030
<0.050 <0.050
102.7 105.7
100.7 110.2
<5.0 <5.0
<5.0 <5.0
<10 <10
<10
<50 <50
<50
<50 <50
<72 <72
YES YES
72.0 79.5
102.4 105.1
<0.050
<0.050
<0.80
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
Physical Tests
Volatile Organic Compounds
Hydrocarbons
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
8PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17
TP01-02 TP01-05 TP02-05 TP02-06 TP03-03
L2021558-1 L2021558-2 L2021558-3 L2021558-4 L2021558-5
12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
Naphthalene (ug/g)
Phenanthrene (ug/g)
Pyrene (ug/g)
Quinoline (ug/g)
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (%)
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14 (%)
B(a)P Total Potency Equivalent (ug/g)
IACR (CCME) (ug/g)
<0.010
<0.030
<0.050
<0.050
84.0
83.8
<0.15
<0.46
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
9PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL08-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17
TP03-06 TP04-01 TP04-04 TP05-02 TP05-04
L2021558-6 L2021558-7 L2021558-8 L2021558-9 L2021558-10
12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
Naphthalene (ug/g)
Phenanthrene (ug/g)
Pyrene (ug/g)
Quinoline (ug/g)
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (%)
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14 (%)
B(a)P Total Potency Equivalent (ug/g)
IACR (CCME) (ug/g)
<0.010 <0.010
<0.030 <0.030
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050 <0.050
87.0 86.5
87.5 87.8
<0.15 <0.15
<0.46 <0.46
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
10PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17
TP05-06 Z001 TP06-03 TP06-05 TP07-01
L2021558-11 L2021558-12 L2021558-13 L2021558-14 L2021558-15
12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
Naphthalene (ug/g)
Phenanthrene (ug/g)
Pyrene (ug/g)
Quinoline (ug/g)
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (%)
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14 (%)
B(a)P Total Potency Equivalent (ug/g)
IACR (CCME) (ug/g)
<0.010
<0.030
<0.050
<0.050
87.4
86.5
<0.15
<0.46
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
11PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17
TP07-05 TP08-02 TP08-06 TP09-01 TP09-04
L2021558-16 L2021558-17 L2021558-18 L2021558-19 L2021558-20
12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
Naphthalene (ug/g)
Phenanthrene (ug/g)
Pyrene (ug/g)
Quinoline (ug/g)
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (%)
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14 (%)
B(a)P Total Potency Equivalent (ug/g)
IACR (CCME) (ug/g)
<0.010
<0.030
<0.050
<0.050
87.2
87.2
<0.15
<0.46
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
12PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17
TP10-02 TP10-05 TP11-03 Z002 TP11-06
L2021558-21 L2021558-22 L2021558-23 L2021558-24 L2021558-25
12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
Naphthalene (ug/g)
Phenanthrene (ug/g)
Pyrene (ug/g)
Quinoline (ug/g)
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (%)
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14 (%)
B(a)P Total Potency Equivalent (ug/g)
IACR (CCME) (ug/g)
<0.010
<0.030
<0.050
<0.050
86.5
85.3
<0.15
<0.46
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
Sample ID Description
Client ID
Sampled Date
Grouping Analyte
Sampled Time
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2021558 CONTD....
13PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
SOIL
SOIL SOIL09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17
TP12-01 TP12-05
L2021558-26 L2021558-27
12:00 12:00
Naphthalene (ug/g)
Phenanthrene (ug/g)
Pyrene (ug/g)
Quinoline (ug/g)
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (%)
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14 (%)
B(a)P Total Potency Equivalent (ug/g)
IACR (CCME) (ug/g)
<0.010
<0.030
<0.050
<0.050
88.0
87.2
<0.15
<0.46
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Reference Information
VOCJ Soil jar was submitted as VOC sample container. VOC results may be biased low, and do not meet federal (CCME) or provincial requirements (for BC, AB-Tier1, MB, ON, SK).
Qualifiers for Individual Parameters Listed:
Description Qualifier
24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
L2021558 CONTD....
14PAGE of
Additional Comments for Sample Listed:
Samplenum Matrix Sample Comments
L2021558-25
L2021558-25
Soil
Soil
Note: Volatile test was conducted on sample with headspace. Results may be biased low.Note: Volatile test was conducted on sample with headspace. Results may be biased low.
Report Remarks
BTX-511-HS-WT
F1-F4-511-CALC-WT
F1-HS-511-WT
F2-F4-511-WT
BTEX-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)
F1-F4 Hydrocarbon Calculated Parameters
F1-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)
F2-F4-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)
BTX is determined by extracting a soil or sediment sample as received with methanol, then analyzing by headspace-GC/MS.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
Analytical methods used for analysis of CCME Petroleum Hydrocarbons have been validated and comply with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC.
Hydrocarbon results are expressed on a dry weight basis.
In cases where results for both F4 and F4G are reported, the greater of the two results must be used in any application of the CWS PHC guidelines and the gravimetric heavy hydrocarbons cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. In samples where BTEX and F1 were analyzed , F1-BTEX represents a value where the sum of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and total Xylenes has been subtracted from F1.
In samples where PAHs, F2 and F3 were analyzed, F2-Naphth represents the result where Naphthalene has been subtracted from F2. F3-PAH represents a result where the sum of Benzo(a)anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, Fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, Phenanthrene, and Pyrene has been subtracted from F3.
Unless otherwise qualified, the following quality control criteria have been met for the F1 hydrocarbon range:1. All extraction and analysis holding times were met.2. Instrument performance showing response factors for C6 and C10 within 30% of the response factor for toluene.3. Linearity of gasoline response within 15% throughout the calibration range.
Unless otherwise qualified, the following quality control criteria have been met for the F2-F4 hydrocarbon ranges:1. All extraction and analysis holding times were met.2. Instrument performance showing C10, C16 and C34 response factors within 10% of their average.3. Instrument performance showing the C50 response factor within 30% of the average of the C10, C16 and C34 response factors.4. Linearity of diesel or motor oil response within 15% throughout the calibration range.
Fraction F1 is determined by extracting a soil or sediment sample as received with methanol, then analyzing by headspace-GC/FID.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported).
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (F2-F4 fractions) are extracted from soil with 1:1 hexane:acetone using a rotary extractor. Extracts are treated with silica gel to remove polar organic interferences. F2, F3, & F4 are analyzed by GC-FID. F4G-sg is analyzed gravimetrically.
Notes: 1. F2 (C10-C16): Sum of all hydrocarbons that elute between nC10 and nC16.2. F3 (C16-C34): Sum of all hydrocarbons that elute between nC16 and nC34.3. F4 (C34-C50): Sum of all hydrocarbons that elute between nC34 and nC50.4. F4G: Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons5. F4G-sg: Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons (F4G) after silica gel treatment.6. Where both F4 (C34-C50) and F4G-sg are reported for a sample, the larger of the two values is used for comparison against the relevant CCME guideline for F4. 7. F4G-sg cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbon results to obtain an estimate of total extractable hydrocarbons. 8. This method is validated for use. 9. Data from analysis of validation and quality control samples is available upon request.10. Reported results are expressed as milligrams per dry kilogram, unless otherwise indicated.
ALS Test Code Test Description
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
SW846 8260
CCME CWS-PHC, Pub #1310, Dec 2001-S
E3398/CCME TIER 1-HS
CCME Tier 1
Method Reference** Matrix
Test Method References:
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
Reference Information 24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)
L2021558 CONTD....
15PAGE of
MOISTURE-WT
PAH-CCME-WT
XYLENES-SUM-CALC-WT
% Moisture
CCME PAHs
Sum of Xylene Isomer Concentrations
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported).
The procedure uses a mechanical shaking technique to extract a representative sub-sample with a mixture of methanol and toluene. The extract is analyzed by GC/MSD. Depending on the analytical GC/MS column used benzo(j)fluoranthene may chromatographically co-elute with benzo(b)fluoranthene or benzo(k)fluoranthene.
Total xylenes represents the sum of o-xylene and m&p-xylene.
Soil
Soil
Soil
Gravimetric: Oven Dried
SW846 8270
CALCULATION
** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance.
The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below:
Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location
WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA
GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMSSurrogate - A compound that is similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that does not occur naturally in environmental samples. Forapplicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery.mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of sample.mg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of sample.mg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight of sample.mg/L - milligrams per litre.< - Less than.D.L. - The reported Detection Limit, also known as the Limit of Reporting (LOR).N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation.
Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.
Chain of Custody Numbers:
Version: FINAL REV. 2
15
Quality Control ReportPage 1 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 24-NOV-17Workorder: L2021558
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
BTX-511-HS-WT Soil
R3886035
R3886894
Batch
Batch
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
WG2663829-4
WG2663829-2
WG2663829-1
WG2663829-5
WG2664876-4
WG2664876-2
WG2663829-3
WG2663829-3
WG2664876-3
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Benzene
<0.0068
<0.018
<0.030
<0.020
<0.080
97.6
94.7
97.3
97.2
98.8
<0.0068
<0.018
<0.030
<0.020
<0.080
102.7
100.3
103.4
98.1
100.9
101.3
103.0
<0.0068
<0.018
<0.030
<0.020
<0.080
98.3
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
60-140
60-140
60-140
60-140
70-130
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
<0.0068
<0.018
<0.030
<0.020
<0.080
<0.0068
<0.018
<0.030
<0.020
<0.080
0.0068
0.018
0.03
0.02
0.08
50-140
50-140
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
9
Quality Control ReportPage 2 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 24-NOV-17Workorder: L2021558
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
BTX-511-HS-WT Soil
R3886894
R3888595
Batch
Batch
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
WG2664876-2
WG2664876-1
WG2664876-5
WG2665796-4
WG2665796-2
WG2665796-1
WG2664876-3
WG2665796-3
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
96.0
98.0
98.7
97.1
<0.0068
<0.018
<0.030
<0.020
<0.080
103.2
104.7
101.4
97.6
99.6
100.6
99.4
<0.0068
<0.018
<0.030
<0.020
<0.080
99.2
83.9
89.6
93.3
90.3
<0.0068
<0.018
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
40
40
40
40
40
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
60-140
60-140
60-140
60-140
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
%
%
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
<0.0068
<0.018
<0.030
<0.020
<0.080
0.0068
0.018
0.03
0.02
0.08
50-140
50-140
0.0068
0.018
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
9
Quality Control ReportPage 3 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 24-NOV-17Workorder: L2021558
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
BTX-511-HS-WT
F1-HS-511-WT
Soil
Soil
R3888595
R3886035
R3886894
R3888595
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
WG2665796-1
WG2665796-5
WG2663829-4
WG2663829-2
WG2663829-1
WG2663829-7
WG2664876-4
WG2664876-2
WG2664876-1
WG2664876-7
WG2665796-4
WG2665796-2
WG2665796-3
WG2663829-3
WG2663829-6
WG2664876-3
WG2664876-6
WG2665796-3
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
F1 (C6-C10)
F1 (C6-C10)
F1 (C6-C10)
Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene
F1 (C6-C10)
F1 (C6-C10)
F1 (C6-C10)
F1 (C6-C10)
Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene
F1 (C6-C10)
F1 (C6-C10)
<0.030
<0.020
<0.080
101.5
98.0
102.4
87.4
93.7
97.0
94.7
<5.0
92.9
<5.0
91.2
99.4
<5.0
101.8
<5.0
106.2
94.7
<5.0
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
N/A
N/A
N/A
30
30
30
60-140
60-140
60-140
60-140
60-140
80-120
60-140
80-120
60-140
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/g
%
ug/g
%
%
ug/g
%
ug/g
%
%
ug/g
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
0.03
0.02
0.08
50-140
50-140
5
60-140
5
60-140
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
9
Quality Control ReportPage 4 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 24-NOV-17Workorder: L2021558
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
F1-HS-511-WT
F2-F4-511-WT
Soil
Soil
R3888595
R3893221
R3893366
Batch
Batch
Batch
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
WG2665796-2
WG2665796-1
WG2665796-7
WG2667254-4
WG2667254-2
WG2667254-1
WG2667254-5
WG2667568-4
WG2667568-2
WG2667568-1
WG2665796-6
WG2667254-3
WG2667254-3
WG2667568-3
F1 (C6-C10)
F1 (C6-C10)
Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene
F1 (C6-C10)
F2 (C10-C16)
F3 (C16-C34)
F4 (C34-C50)
F2 (C10-C16)
F3 (C16-C34)
F4 (C34-C50)
F2 (C10-C16)
F3 (C16-C34)
F4 (C34-C50)
Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride
F2 (C10-C16)
F3 (C16-C34)
F4 (C34-C50)
F2 (C10-C16)
F3 (C16-C34)
F4 (C34-C50)
F2 (C10-C16)
F3 (C16-C34)
F4 (C34-C50)
96.6
<5.0
104.9
84.9
<10
<50
<50
98.8
97.7
100.8
<10
<50
<50
92.3
102.8
103.9
106.3
<10
<50
<50
98.6
102.0
91.8
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30
30
30
30
30
30
80-120
60-140
80-120
80-120
80-120
60-140
60-140
60-140
80-120
80-120
80-120
%
ug/g
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
<10
<50
<50
<10
<50
<50
5
60-140
10
50
50
60-140
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
9
Quality Control ReportPage 5 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 24-NOV-17Workorder: L2021558
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
F2-F4-511-WT
MOISTURE-WT
PAH-CCME-WT
Soil
Soil
Soil
R3893366
R3886814
R3888111
R3891531
R3892802
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
MB
DUP
WG2667568-1
WG2667568-5
WG2664829-3
WG2664829-2
WG2664829-1
WG2665851-3
WG2665851-2
WG2665851-1
WG2667302-3
WG2667302-2
WG2667302-1
WG2666039-4
WG2667568-3
L2021558-1
L2023673-3
L2021558-10
WG2666039-3
F2 (C10-C16)
F3 (C16-C34)
F4 (C34-C50)
Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride
F2 (C10-C16)
F3 (C16-C34)
F4 (C34-C50)
% Moisture
% Moisture
% Moisture
% Moisture
% Moisture
% Moisture
% Moisture
% Moisture
% Moisture
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
<10
<50
<50
87.3
90.9
93.8
86.2
17.7
99.9
<0.10
11.7
98.9
<0.10
19.9
98.5
<0.10
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
16-NOV-17
18-NOV-17
18-NOV-17
18-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
0.6
2.1
0.1
N/A
N/A
20
20
20
40
40
60-140
60-140
60-140
90-110
90-110
90-110
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
17.6
12.0
19.9
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
10
50
50
60-140
0.1
0.1
0.1
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
9
Quality Control ReportPage 6 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 24-NOV-17Workorder: L2021558
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
PAH-CCME-WT Soil
R3892802BatchDUP
LCS
WG2666039-4
WG2666039-2
WG2666039-3Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acridine
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Quinoline
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acridine
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Fluoranthene
<0.050
<0.050
<0.80
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.010
<0.030
<0.050
<0.050
99.7
98.6
99.2
93.7
92.1
100.6
93.1
98.9
97.6
98.8
105.1
101.9
98.1
93.0
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
40
40
50
40
40
40
50
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
50
50-140
50-140
60-130
60-130
50-140
60-130
60-130
60-140
50-140
60-130
60-130
60-130
60-130
60-130
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
<0.050
<0.050
<0.80
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.010
<0.030
<0.050
<0.050
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
9
Quality Control ReportPage 7 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 24-NOV-17Workorder: L2021558
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
PAH-CCME-WT Soil
R3892802BatchLCS
MB
MS
WG2666039-2
WG2666039-1
WG2666039-5 WG2666039-3
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Quinoline
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acridine
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Quinoline
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
92.6
86.6
98.9
97.0
92.4
78.5
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.80
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.010
<0.030
<0.050
<0.050
85.4
82.3
88.6
87.8
87.4
83.1
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
60-130
60-130
50-130
60-130
60-130
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
%
%
%
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.8
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.05
50-140
50-140
9
Quality Control ReportPage 8 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 24-NOV-17Workorder: L2021558
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
PAH-CCME-WT Soil
R3892802BatchMSWG2666039-5 WG2666039-3
Acridine
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Quinoline
83.0
89.4
90.2
96.3
90.8
81.0
93.7
92.4
88.0
89.0
82.4
83.9
88.7
88.2
86.3
68.0
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
22-NOV-17
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
9
Quality Control Report
Page 9 of
Report Date: 24-NOV-17Workorder: L2021558
Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions:
Description Qualifier
RPD-NA Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit.
Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives)DUP DuplicateRPD Relative Percent DifferenceN/A Not AvailableLCS Laboratory Control SampleSRM Standard Reference MaterialMS Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateADE Average Desorption EfficiencyMB Method BlankIRM Internal Reference MaterialCRM Certified Reference MaterialCCV Continuing Calibration VerificationCVS Calibration Verification StandardLCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
Legend:
The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against pre-determined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results.
Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.
Hold Time Exceedances:
All test results reported with this submission were conducted within ALS recommended hold times.
ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal government requirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by the US EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS.
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
9
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:21 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-1Client Sample ID: TP01-02
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:23 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-2Client Sample ID: TP01-05
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 3:56:22 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-3Client Sample ID: TP02-05
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:25 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-4Client Sample ID: TP02-06
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:27 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-5Client Sample ID: TP03-03
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:29 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-6Client Sample ID: TP03-06
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:31 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-7Client Sample ID: TP04-01
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:33 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-8Client Sample ID: TP04-04
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:35 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-10Client Sample ID: TP05-04
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:37 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-11Client Sample ID: TP05-06
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 3:56:24 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-12Client Sample ID: Z001
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:39 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-13Client Sample ID: TP06-03
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:43 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-14Client Sample ID: TP06-05
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:45 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-15Client Sample ID: TP07-01
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:47 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-16Client Sample ID: TP07-05
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:52 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-17Client Sample ID: TP08-02
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:53 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-18Client Sample ID: TP08-06
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:55 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-19Client Sample ID: TP09-01
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:57 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-20Client Sample ID: TP09-04
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:59 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-21Client Sample ID: TP10-02
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:09 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-22Client Sample ID: TP10-05
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:03 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-23Client Sample ID: TP11-03
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:11 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-24Client Sample ID: Z002
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:13 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-25Client Sample ID: TP11-06
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:15 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-26Client Sample ID: TP12-01
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:17 PM
ALS Sample ID: L2021558-27Client Sample ID: TP12-05
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Time - Minutes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Response - M
illiVolts
[This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.]
13-NOV-17
Lab Work Order #: L2021556
Date Received:Pottinger Gaherty Environmental
102 - 250 Water StreetWhitby ON L1N 0G5
ATTN: Salima JafferFINAL 22-NOV-17 12:28 (MT)Report Date:
Version:
Certificate of Analysis
ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
____________________________________________
Mathy MahadevaAccount Manager
ADDRESS: 95 West Beaver Creek Road, Unit 1, Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1H2 Canada | Phone: +1 905 881 9887 | Fax: +1 905 881 8062
Client Phone: 905-668-4908
MOOSE FACTORY ISLAND-PGL 3889-02.01Job Reference: NOT SUBMITTEDProject P.O. #:
C of C Numbers:Legal Site Desc:
Result
22-NOV-17 12:28 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, General Waste Control Regulation No. 347/90
L2021556 CONTD....2Page of
MOOSE FACTORY ISLAND-PGL 3889-02.01ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, General Waste Control Regulation No. 347/90
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
4
L2021556-1 TCLPClient on 08-NOV-17 @ 12:00Sampled By:SoilMatrix: #1
Sample Preparation
Physical Tests
TCLP Extractables
TCLP Metals
Initial pHFinal pH
Air Velocity Of Fume HoodBurning RateIgnitability-Class
Samp Comment
Temperature Of Test MaterialTime To Ignition
Aroclor 1242Aroclor 1248Aroclor 1254Aroclor 1260Benzo(a)pyrene3&4-MethylphenolCresols (total)Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss2,4-Dichlorophenol2,4-DinitrotolueneFluoride (F)HexachlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadieneHexachloroethane2-MethylphenolNitrate and Nitrite as NNitrate-NNitrite-NNitrobenzeneTotal PCBsPentachlorophenol2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2,4,6-TrichlorophenolSurrogate: 2,4,6-TribromophenolSurrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene d5Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
Arsenic (As)Barium (Ba)Boron (B)
9.235.54
0.70N/A
NON FLAMMABLE
BROWN SOIL21.0N/A
<0.00020<0.00020<0.00020<0.00020<0.00020<0.010<0.015<0.10
<0.0050<0.0040
<10<0.0040<0.0040<0.0040<0.0050
<4.0<2.0<2.0
<0.0040<0.00040<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050
94.988.4
88.8
87.4101.6
<0.050<0.50<2.5
0.100.10
0.100.010
1.01.0
0.000200.000200.000200.000200.000200.0100.0150.10
0.00500.0040
100.00400.00400.00400.0050
4.02.02.0
0.00400.000400.00500.00500.00500.005050-15040-160
40-160
50-15060-140
0.0500.502.5
pH unitspH units
m/secmm/secNo Unit
No Unit
Deg. Csec
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
%%
%
%%
mg/Lmg/Lmg/L
17-NOV-1717-NOV-17
21-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-1721-NOV-17
21-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1720-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1720-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-1721-NOV-17
20-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-17
0.001
2002090
0.13150.00.130.53.0
1000
2.00.36
10.04000.5
2.5100500
Result
22-NOV-17 12:28 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, General Waste Control Regulation No. 347/90
L2021556 CONTD....3Page of
MOOSE FACTORY ISLAND-PGL 3889-02.01ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, General Waste Control Regulation No. 347/90
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
4
L2021556-1 TCLPClient on 08-NOV-17 @ 12:00Sampled By:SoilMatrix: #1
TCLP Metals
TCLP VOCs
Volatile Organic Compounds
Cadmium (Cd)Chromium (Cr)Lead (Pb)Mercury (Hg)Selenium (Se)Silver (Ag)Uranium (U)
1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,4-DichlorobenzeneBenzeneCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroformDichloromethaneMethyl Ethyl KetoneTetrachloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideSurrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
<0.0050<0.050<0.050
<0.00010<0.025<0.0050<0.25
<0.025<0.025<0.025<0.025<0.025<0.025<0.025<0.10<0.50<1.0
<0.025<0.025<0.050100.8
99.4
0.00500.0500.050
0.000100.0250.00500.25
0.0250.0250.0250.0250.0250.0250.0250.100.501.0
0.0250.0250.050
70-130
70-130
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
%
%
20-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1717-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-17
20-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
0.55.05.00.11.05.010
1.420.00.50.50.50.58105.0
200.035
0.2
Reference Information
MOOSE FACTORY ISLAND-PGL 3889-02.01 L2021556 CONTD....4Page of
22-NOV-17 12:28 (MT)
BNA-TCLP-WT
CN-TCLP-WTF-TCLP-WTHG-TCLP-WTIGNITABILITY-WT
LEACH-TCLP-WT
MET-TCLP-WT
N2N3-TCLP-WTPCB-TCLP-WTVOC-TCLP-WT
BNAs for O. Reg 347
Cyanide for O. Reg 347Fluoride (F) for O. Reg 347Mercury (CVAA) for O.Reg 347O. Reg 347 Ignitability
Leachate Procedure for Reg 347
O.Reg 347 TCLP Leachable MetalsNitrate/Nitrite-N for O. Reg 347PCBs for O. Reg 347VOC for O. Reg 347
Samples are leached according to TCLP protocol and then the aqueous leachate is extracted and the resulting extracts are analyzed on GC/MSD
Preliminary Screening Test:Prepare a sample "as received" 250 mm long by 20 mm wide by 10 mm high. Apply the tip of the flame to the end of the sample strip.If the sample is non-metallic, hold the flame tip on the sample until the sample ignites or for a maximum of 2 minutes. If combustion occurs, begin timing with a stop watch and note whether the sample propagates up to the 200 mm mark within the 2 minute test period.If the sample is metal or metal alloy powder, hold the flame tip on the sample until the sample ignites or for a maximum of 5 minutes. If combusiton occurs, begin timing with a stop watch and note whether the sample propagates up to the 200 mm mark within the 20 minute test period.Note: If the waste propagates burning of 200 mm of the test strip within 2 minutes (20 minutes for metals), the material must be evaluated by the burning rate test.Burning Rate Test:Refer to section 7.2 of EPA Method 1030. Samples that have a burning rate of greater than 2.2 mm/s are considered to have a positive result for ignitability according to DOT regulations. For metallic samples , the burning rate must be greater than 0.17 mm/s.
Inorganic and Semi-Volatile Organic contaminants are leached from waste samples in strict accordance with US EPA Method 1311, "Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure" (TCLP). Test results are reported in leachate concentration units (normally mg/L).
A sample of waste is leached in a zero headspace extractor at 30–2 rpm for 18–2.0 hours with the appropriate leaching solution. After tumbling the leachate is analyzed directly by headspace technology, followed by GC/MS using internal standard quantitation.
Methods Listed (if applicable):
ALS Test Code Test Description
Waste
WasteWasteWasteWaste
Waste
Waste
WasteWasteWaste
SW846 8270
APHA 4500CN C EAPHA 4110 B-Ion ChromatographySW846 7470AEPA SW846, Method 1030, 1996
EPA 1311
EPA 200.8
APHA 4110 B-Ion ChromatographySW846 8270SW846 8260
Method Reference***
*** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance.
Matrix
GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS
Surrogates are compounds that are similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that do not normally occur in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. In reports that display the D.L. column, laboratory objectives for surrogates are listed there.mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of samplemg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of samplemg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight mg/L - unit of concentration based on volume, parts per million.< - Less than.D.L. - The reporting limit.N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation.
Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.
Application of guidelines is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information.
The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below:
Chain of Custody numbers:
Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location
WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA
4
Quality Control ReportPage 1 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 22-NOV-17Workorder: L2021556
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
BNA-TCLP-WT Waste
R3892041BatchDUP
LCS
MB
WG2667075-5
WG2667075-2
WG2667075-1
WG2667075-32,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Methylphenol
3&4-Methylphenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Methylphenol
3&4-Methylphenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0040
<0.0050
<0.010
<0.00020
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0050
114.6
107.9
104.7
97.7
121.2
75.8
74.2
101.3
94.3
86.8
73.2
92.0
140.3
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0040
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
60-140
60-140
60-140
60-140
50-150
60-140
60-140
60-140
60-140
40-130
40-130
60-140
50-160
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0040
<0.0050
<0.010
<0.00020
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0050
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.005
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
8
Quality Control ReportPage 2 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 22-NOV-17Workorder: L2021556
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
BNA-TCLP-WT
CN-TCLP-WT
Waste
Waste
R3892041
R3891527
Batch
Batch
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
WG2667075-1
WG2667075-4
WG2667261-3
WG2667261-2
WG2667261-1
WG2667075-3
L2021501-1
2-Methylphenol
3&4-Methylphenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene d5
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Methylphenol
3&4-Methylphenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss
<0.0050
<0.010
<0.00020
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0050
82.9
83.4
94.8
86.6
114.6
101.3
98.1
92.6
113.6
70.7
68.7
97.4
85.7
70.0
61.7
86.0
135.6
<0.10
107.2
<0.10
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
N/A 20
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
40-150
40-150
40-150
50-150
50-150
70-130
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
<0.10
0.005
0.01
0.0002
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.005
50-150
40-160
60-140
50-150
0.1
RPD-NA
8
Quality Control ReportPage 3 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 22-NOV-17Workorder: L2021556
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
CN-TCLP-WT
F-TCLP-WT
HG-TCLP-WT
MET-TCLP-WT
Waste
Waste
Waste
Waste
R3891527
R3891885
R3887406
R3888741
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
WG2667261-4
WG2667418-3
WG2667418-2
WG2667418-1
WG2667418-4
WG2666240-3
WG2666240-2
WG2666240-1
WG2666240-4
WG2667032-4
WG2667032-2
L2021501-1
L2021501-1
L2021501-1
L2022280-1
L2022280-1
WG2667032-3
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Mercury (Hg)
Mercury (Hg)
Mercury (Hg)
Mercury (Hg)
Silver (Ag)
Arsenic (As)
Boron (B)
Barium (Ba)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chromium (Cr)
Lead (Pb)
Selenium (Se)
Uranium (U)
102.2
<10
93.3
<10
97.5
<0.00010
98.0
<0.00010
94.7
<0.0050
<0.050
<2.5
<0.50
<0.0050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.025
<0.25
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30
50
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
50-150
70-130
50-150
70-130
50-140
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
<10
<0.00010
<0.0050
<0.050
<2.5
<0.50
<0.0050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.025
<0.25
10
0.0001
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
8
Quality Control ReportPage 4 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 22-NOV-17Workorder: L2021556
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
MET-TCLP-WT
N2N3-TCLP-WT
Waste
Waste
R3888741
R3891885
Batch
Batch
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
WG2667032-2
WG2667032-1
WG2667032-5
WG2667418-3
WG2667032-3
L2021501-1
Silver (Ag)
Arsenic (As)
Boron (B)
Barium (Ba)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chromium (Cr)
Lead (Pb)
Selenium (Se)
Uranium (U)
Silver (Ag)
Arsenic (As)
Boron (B)
Barium (Ba)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chromium (Cr)
Lead (Pb)
Selenium (Se)
Uranium (U)
Silver (Ag)
Arsenic (As)
Boron (B)
Barium (Ba)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chromium (Cr)
Lead (Pb)
Selenium (Se)
Uranium (U)
Nitrate-N
Nitrite-N
102.3
99.9
96.7
105.3
99.6
99.1
102.1
95.4
100.6
<0.0050
<0.050
<2.5
<0.50
<0.0050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.025
<0.25
133.5
107.6
97.0
109.3
109.2
100.8
103.9
105.7
106.4
<2.0
<2.0
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
N/A
N/A
30
30
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
<2.0
<2.0
0.005
0.05
2.5
0.5
0.005
0.05
0.05
0.025
0.25
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
8
Quality Control ReportPage 5 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 22-NOV-17Workorder: L2021556
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
N2N3-TCLP-WT
PCB-TCLP-WT
Waste
Waste
R3891885
R3891859
Batch
Batch
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MB
MS
WG2667418-2
WG2667418-1
WG2667418-4
WG2667472-4
WG2667472-2
WG2667472-1
WG2667472-6
WG2667472-5
L2021501-1
WG2667472-3
WG2667472-3
Nitrate-N
Nitrite-N
Nitrate-N
Nitrite-N
Nitrate-N
Nitrite-N
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1254
100.9
98.3
<2.0
<2.0
102.8
98.1
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
74.7
84.4
107.3
104.6
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
89.4
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
97.6
67.1
104.1
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
21-NOV-17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
50
50
50
50
70-130
70-130
50-150
50-150
65-130
65-130
65-130
65-130
50-150
50-150
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
2
2
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
40-160
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
40-160
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
8
Quality Control ReportPage 6 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 22-NOV-17Workorder: L2021556
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
PCB-TCLP-WT
VOC-TCLP-WT
Waste
Waste
R3891859
R3887124
Batch
Batch
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
WG2667472-5
WG2656319-4
WG2656319-1
WG2656319-2
WG2667472-3
L2021415-11
Aroclor 1260
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
1,1-Dichloroethylene
103.0
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.10
<0.50
<1.0
<0.025
<0.025
<0.050
87.9
99.6
96.5
101.5
99.0
98.5
99.1
98.8
97.1
96.1
100.0
101.1
84.1
<0.025
21-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50-150
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
70-130
70-130
70-130
50-150
70-130
70-130
60-130
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
mg/L
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.10
<0.50
<1.0
<0.025
<0.025
<0.050
0.025
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
8
Quality Control ReportPage 7 of
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
Report Date: 22-NOV-17Workorder: L2021556
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-TCLP-WT Waste
R3887124BatchMB
MS
WG2656319-2
WG2656319-5 L2021415-11
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.10
<0.50
<1.0
<0.025
<0.025
<0.050
98.1
99.8
80.3
99.8
101.4
99.99
98.6
94.1
99.95
100.0
98.1
104.6
95.2
99.1
72.8
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
17-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
20-NOV-17
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.1
0.5
1
0.025
0.025
0.05
70-130
70-130
8
Quality Control Report
Page 8 of
Report Date: 22-NOV-17Workorder: L2021556
Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions:
Description Qualifier
RPD-NA Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit.
Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives)DUP DuplicateRPD Relative Percent DifferenceN/A Not AvailableLCS Laboratory Control SampleSRM Standard Reference MaterialMS Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateADE Average Desorption EfficiencyMB Method BlankIRM Internal Reference MaterialCRM Certified Reference MaterialCCV Continuing Calibration VerificationCVS Calibration Verification StandardLCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
Legend:
The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against pre-determined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results.
Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.
Hold Time Exceedances:
All test results reported with this submission were conducted within ALS recommended hold times.
ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal government requirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by the US EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS.
Client:
Contact:
Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer
8