submission 64
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
1/15
Page 1
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Strengthening the AQF:
A Framework for Australias Qualifications
Submission to July 2010 Consultation Paper
August 2010
Prepared by the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
2/15
Page 2
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Table of Contents
Abbreviations................................... ..................................................... ......................... 3
About CCI .................................................. ........................................................ ............. 4
Context ...................................................... ....................................................... .............. 4
Executive Summary.............................................. ........................................................ . 5
The Proposed Australian Qualifications Framework.................................................. 6
Nomenclature...................................... ........................................................ ................... 7
Senior Secondary Certificate of Education ........................................................ ......... 9
Australian Qualifications Framework Policies.......................................................... 12
Draft AQF Generic Skills Policy............................................................................................... 12
Draft AQF Qualifications Issuance Policy.............................................................................. 13
Draft AQF Qualifications Pathways and Linkages Policy..................................................... 14
Endnotes ................................................... ..................................................... .............. 15
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
3/15
Page 3
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Abbreviations
ANZSCO Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of
Occupations
AQF Australian Qualifications Framework
ATAR Australian Tertiary Admission Rank
CCI Chamber of Commerce and Industry of WA
SSCE Senior Secondary Certificate of Education
VET Vocational Education and Training
WACE Western Australian Certificate of Education
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
4/15
Page 4
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
About CCI
The Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia (CCI) is the leading
business association in Western Australia.
It is the second largest organisation of its kind in Australia, with a membership of
almost 6,000 organisations in all sectors including manufacturing, resources,
agriculture, transport, communications, retailing, hospitality, building and
construction, community services and finance.
Most members are private businesses, but CCI also has representation in the
not-for-profit sector and the government sector. About 80 per cent of members are
small businesses, and members are located in all geographical regions of WesternAustralia.
Context
In an environment of anticipated labour and skills shortages, it is imperative that
Australia has a robust and flexible education and training system that ensures
employers can access suitably qualified workers and is internationally competitive.
Improvements that lift the overall performance of Australian education andtraining will deliver strong outcomes and be responsive to the needs of industry.
Education and training plays an important role in increasing workforce
participation, upskilling existing workers and educating the future workforce
through the provision of flexible achievement options and transparent pathways.
This submission builds upon a number of CCI papers. These include:
Strategies for Growth;
Building Western Australias Workforce for Tomorrow; and
Building a Better Tomorrow: Education Reform in WA.
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
5/15
Page 5
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Executive Summary
The proposed Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) provides employers
with explicit direction on the knowledge, skills and application that aredemonstrated by holders of specific levels of qualifications. However, a number of
important issues must be addressed to achieve national consistency and common
understanding among all stakeholders. These include:
inadequacy of consultation with key stakeholders such as industry and
employers;
misrepresentation of the Senior Secondary Certificate of Education in the
proposed framework; and
lack of consistency with current industry practice and employer expectations.
In addressing these issues, the following recommendations are made in this
submission:
1. The AQF Council should consult over a longer timeframe and adopt a
transparent process that actively seeks input from all stakeholders, including
employer groups.
2. The types of work in the level summaries and the purpose statements of each
qualification type should be consistent with the Australian and New ZealandClassification of Occupations (ANZSCO) skill level descriptions.
3. The Senior Secondary Certificate of Education should be spread across
Level 13.
4. The generic skills listed in the Draft AQF Generic Skills Policy should be
limited to employability skills.
5. In developing a policy on reporting qualifications and achievement, employers
should be consulted on the information they need to effectively assess a
potential employees qualifications.
6. The AQF Council should correct inconsistencies in policies on credit transfers
and implement a quality assurance mechanism to ensure its consistent national
application.
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
6/15
Page 6
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
The Proposed Australian Qualifications
Framework
Industry has clear expectations of the level of proficiency that workers who hold
specific qualifications can demonstrate. Employers use this understanding when
assessing potential workers for suitability and matching job roles to qualifications.
Industry welcomes the opportunity to provide input into the proposed AQF.
However, the consultation period for the July 2010 paper is too brief. The final
face-to-face briefing was held in Melbourne on 29 July; the closing date for
submissions is 4 August. This timeframe is too short to enable detailed and
considered responses.
Consultation must involve all stakeholders who will be affected by the proposed
AQF, including employers. Education and training providers have specialised
expertise that should be utilised in the consultation process. However, the
consultation process has been biased towards this group of stakeholders.
The AQF Council should adopt a more transparent consultation strategy that
actively seeks input from all stakeholders. A longer timeframe would provide
opportunity for a detailed and well-considered response. All written submissions
made to the AQF Council should be made public, unless specifically requested not
to by respondents.
Findings: The consultation has been too brief. Additionally, past consultations
have been biased towards education and training service providers and not sought
input from employers.
Recommendation: The AQF Council should consult over a longer timeframe and
adopt a transparent process that actively seeks input from all stakeholders,including industry and employer groups.
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
7/15
Page 7
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Nomenclature
The AQF defines knowledge, skills, and their application across ten levels. It also
maps qualification types awarded by schools, vocational education and training(VET) providers and tertiary education providers to these levels. The language
used in the proposed Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) is inconsistent
with industry understanding and expectations.
The level summaries and the qualification type descriptors both use the following
terms to describe the types of work undertaken by graduates at particular levels or
of specific qualifications: skilled work; paraprofessional work; professional or
highly skilled work; and professional practice.1
However, definitions for these
terms are not provided in the Glossary of Terminology. This lack of clarity may
cause confusion among employers applying the proposed AQF to their workers.
The Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations
(ANZSCO) is a system that employers are familiar with and is widely used both
by individual States/Territories and nationally. The Australian Bureau of Statistics
(ABS) uses ANZSCO to classify occupations into five skill levels. Its key feature
is that it takes into account knowledge and skills, and the application of knowledge
and skills demonstrated through previous work experience and on-the-job training.
ANZCO is used by State and Federal government departments and
non-government organisations in a variety of contexts. Examples include:
Department of Immigration and Citizenship ANZSCO is used to
differentiate between visa classes under Australias skilled migration program;
National Centre for Vocational Education Research ANZSCO is used by
Registered Training Organisations when reporting on VET activities; and
Department of Training and Workforce Development ANZSCO is used in
the State Priority Occupations List to identify jobs that are in high demand and
considered industry-critical in Western Australia.
In describing the types of work that holders of different level qualifications are
able to undertake, the nomenclature used should be consistent with ANZSCO Skill
Level descriptions in order to provide greater specificity and alignment with
industry expectations.
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
8/15
Page 8
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Findings: Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations
(ANZSCO) is already being used in VET reporting and is widely used both in
States/Territories and nationally. It takes into account AQF qualifications and
learning through work experience and on-the-job training.
Recommendation: The types of work in the level summaries and the purpose
statements of each qualification type should be consistent with the Australian and
New Zealand Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) skill level descriptions.
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
9/15
Page 9
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Senior Secondary Certificate of Education
The proposal to align the Senior Secondary Certificate of Education (SSCE) with
Level 3 is inconsistent with employer expectations of school leavers. Placing theSSCE at the same level with holders of Certificate III implies that school leavers
have the same knowledge and skills as someone who has successfully completed
an apprenticeship and holds a Certificate III qualification. Placing the SSCE and
Certificate III on the same level will potentially misrepresent school leaver
qualifications to businesses.
Employers are familiar with the Australian and New Zealand Standard
Classifications for Occupations (ANSZCO). While ANZSCO places compulsory
secondary education on the same level as AQF Certificate I, it also allows for
relevant work experience and on-the-job training to be considered when
determining skill level.2
In Western Australia, senior secondary students study courses at one of three
stages; some courses have an additional fourth stage. Generally, there are three
main patterns of study:
Year 11 students who study Stage 1 units progress to Stage 2 units in Year 12;
More capable students study Stage 2 units in Year 11 and Stage 3 units in Year
12; and
Students study only Stage 1 units during their final two years of senior
secondary schooling.
Students who have studied four or more courses at Stage 2 or Stage 3 in their final
year of secondary schooling receive an Australian Tertiary Admission Rank
(ATAR) following the successful completion of external examinations. The ATAR
enables students to be considered for admission into a university. Students who
study Stage 1 or 2 units in Year 12 complete Vocational Education and Training
(VET) through Certificates I, II or III.3
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
10/15
Page 10
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Chart 1
Year 12 Attainment
WACE students who also study VET
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Source: Curriculum Council
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000WACE VET
There is an increasing trend in the VET qualifications being achieved as part of the
WACE (Chart 1). Nationally, the number of students involved in VET in Schools
between 2007 and 2008 increased by 26 per cent.4
In 2009, 33 per cent of students
obtaining a WACE were enrolled in one or more units of competency in Year 12.5
The majority of VET qualifications obtained by these students were achieved at
either Certificate I or Certificate II level, but there is an increasing trend towards
Certificate III and Certificate IV (Chart 2).
Chart 2
VET Qualifications Achieved
Year 12 Students in 2009
Cert I
39%
Cert III
9%
Cert IV
1%
Cert II51%
Source: Curriculum Council
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
11/15
Page 11
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Industry has specific expectations of the level of competence demonstrated by
holders of different AQF qualifications. For instance, in the construction industry:
outcomes for Certificate II qualifications indicate a labourer who can operate a
narrow range of skills under supervision;
outcomes for Certificate III qualifications indicate independent knowledgeable
tradespeople such as a plant operator or carpenter; and
outcomes for Certificate IV qualifications are employees who can supervise
others.
Placing school leavers on the same level as people with Certificate III
qualifications implies that school leavers are also independent and knowledgeable.
While this may be the case in some instances, this view is not commonly held
among employers, especially in the case of students with minimal or no work
experience.
The current proposal to map the SSCE to Level 3 misrepresents a school leavers
qualification to employers. The SSCE should be spread across Level 13.
Findings: While there are large numbers of school students studying VET, for
those who have not studied VET and have no work experience, industry
expectations of school leavers differ from expectations of holders of AQF
Certificate III qualifications. Placing both qualifications on the same level
misrepresents school qualifications to businesses.
Recommendation: The Senior Secondary Certificate of Education should be
spread across Level 13.
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
12/15
Page 12
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Australian Qualifications Framework Policies
The draft policies contained within the proposed Australian Qualifications
Framework (AQF) impact on businesses providing education and training services,
as well as general employers. To avoid unnecessary regulatory burden, any policy
changes should be based on the following principles:
justified policies should focus on achieving national consistency and
ensuring high quality outcomes;
transparent the development of policies should be underpinned by a
transparent process that involves extensive consultation with all relevant
stakeholders; and
costs should be commensurate with benefits
any costs associated with thedevelopment of policies, and their subsequent compliance, should be
commensurate with the benefit derived from the policy.
Draft AQF Generic Skills Policy
In Western Australia, the Workplace Learning Course studied in schools is
underpinned by employability skill groups. Similar courses operate in schools
across Australia. In the Vocational Education and Training (VET) sector,
employability skills are embedded in nationally endorsed Training Package Units
of Competency. Compliance with this policy will require changes to the teaching
and/or assessment of school workplace learning courses, nationally endorsed
training packages, and university courses.
The Draft AQF Glossary of Terminology implies that generic skills and
employability skills may be used interchangeably. This is inaccurate.
Employability skills are commonly used and widely understood across education
and training sectors, and industry, and specifically to the following eight areas:
communication;
teamwork;
problem solving;
initiative and enterprise;
planning and organisation;
self management;
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
13/15
Page 13
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
learning; and
technology.6
While generic skills include the employability skills, generic skills extend to other
areas that may be described as social awareness skills. These include areas such as:
being respectful to others; cultural understanding; and having a global perspective.
Some universities include similar skills as part of their graduate attributes.
The supplementing of employability skills with social awareness skills is not
justified. Further, a consequence of having to comply with the Generic Skills
Policy is the cost of having to revise every training package and high school
workplace learning course. The additional skills are already implicit in a number
of the employability skills. For instance, the employability skills of teamworknecessitates that individuals be respectful to others when working in a team. The
industry specific employability skills that are contained within the Training
Packages have been developed in collaboration with industry. Using the current
Employability Skills Framework provides a more focussed context within which to
develop these social awareness skills.
Findings: Employability skills are widely used and understood among education
and training providers, and industry. They underpin workplace learning courses
that are offered in secondary schools, and are embedded in Training Package
Units of Competency. Generic skills are broader than employability skills,
extending to areas of social awareness.
Recommendation: The generic skills listed in the policy should be limited to
employability skills.
Draft AQF Qualifications Issuance Policy
Industry welcomes national consistency on the information that is reported on
qualifications and student achievement. However, there has been a lack of
consultation seeking employer input. The AQF Council should seek input from
employers on the sorts of information they require to effectively assess a potential
employees qualifications.
Recommendation: In developing a policy on reporting qualifications and
achievement, employers should be consulted on the information they need to
effectively assess a potential employees qualifications.
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
14/15
Page 14
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Draft AQF Qualifications Pathways and Linkages Policy
An effective national Qualifications Pathways and Linkages Policy makes it easier
for employers to transfer workers between different States/Territories. Further,
nationally consistent policies on credit transfers also enable effective articulation
between education and training sectors, irrespective of States/Territories.
There are currently contains two draft policies dealing with credit arrangements on
the AQF website: AQF National Policy and Guidelines on Credit Arrangements
and AQF National Policy and Guidelines on Credit Arrangements. Both policies
contain different arrangements for credit transfers. This will cause confusion
among education and training providers, and result in qualifications being awarded
before all course requirements have been met.
The AQF Council needs to correct the inconsistencies and implement a quality
assurance mechanism that ensures that the policy is consistently applied
nationally.
Findings: There are inconsistencies present in Draft Policies dealing with credit
arrangements.
Recommendation: The AQF Council should correct inconsistencies in policies on
credit transfers and implement a quality assurance mechanism to ensure its
consistent national application.
-
8/4/2019 Submission 64
15/15
Page 15
Strengthening the AQF
CCI Submissionto theConsultation Paper
All rights reserved
Endnotes
1AQF Council, Strengthening the AQF: A framework for Australias qualifications,
Consultation paper, July 2010, p.14.
2Australian Bureau of Statistics, Information Paper: Australian and New Zealand
Standard Classification of Occupations, 2005, Catalogue 1221.0, p.13.
3Curriculum Council, The Western Australian Certificate of Education for students
starting Year 11 in 2011, retrieved from http://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/internet.
4
National Centre for Vocational Education Research, VET in Schools 2008, retrieved fromhttp://www.ncver.edu.au/vetsystem/31111.html.
5Curriculum Council, Year 12 Statistics for 2009.
6Retrieved from
http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/CareersandTransitions/EmployabilitySkills/Pages/Ov
erview.aspx
http://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/internethttp://www.ncver.edu.au/vetsystem/31111.htmlhttp://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/CareersandTransitions/EmployabilitySkills/Pages/Overview.aspxhttp://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/CareersandTransitions/EmployabilitySkills/Pages/Overview.aspxhttp://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/CareersandTransitions/EmployabilitySkills/Pages/Overview.aspxhttp://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/CareersandTransitions/EmployabilitySkills/Pages/Overview.aspxhttp://www.ncver.edu.au/vetsystem/31111.htmlhttp://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/internet