stranger things: building materials of the future · pdf fileclick to edit master title style...
TRANSCRIPT
Click To Edit Master Title Style
Stranger Things: Building Materials of the Future
Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:00 to 3:15 pm
Panelists
Melissa Lapsa, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)
Tom Culp, PhD Birchpoint Consulting Achilles Karagiozis, PhD Owens Corning
2
Melissa Lapsa ORNL
Building Envelope: 5.81 Quads
4
The commercial building envelope is the primary determinant of the amount of energy required to heat, cool,
and ventilate a building
Barriers Identified for Envelope Technologies
Cost: uncertainties, high first costs, ROI hurdles
Supply issues: product fragility, availability, volume
Installation issues: workforce training, complex systems, quality control
Decision culture: resistance to new products, risk averse, code minimum culture
Information gap: real world case studies, data on long-term performance, communicating effectively
Strange Things. Innovations for Windows
Transparent Thermal Insulation Material
ORNL/VELUX collaboration
No use of supercritical drying (a costly method)
Potential for scale up Low cost
Thermally Insulative Window Applied Film
New! ARPA-E funded Developing transparent
thermally insulative applied films
Transparent and mechanically strong
6
Strange Things Innovations for Building Envelope Systems
Modified Atmosphere Insulation (MAI) ORNL/NanoPore/Firestone collaboration: new composite foam-MAI
insulation board Measured R23.8 within 2-inches vs R6/in for existing insulation Projected MAI cost at large-scale production (1% of commercial roof
insulation material market share): $1.98/ft2 MAI composite board : $2.37/ft2 (vs. $1.70/ft2 for 4 regular polyiso board) Cost offsets : dual function as a coverboard, lower shipping and storage
costs
7
1-inch MAI panels being carried into polyisocyanurate production line.
Finished board; 2-inch overall thickness with MAI panels completely
encapsulated. MAI cores surrounded by polyiso foam
Strange Things Architectural Precast Insulated Panels
30% Faster production of complex molds
50% Lighter panels
50% Higher thermal performance
Cost neutral
2 : 2 : 3
Concrete wythe
XPS insulation
Concrete density = 144 pcf Panel weight = 60 psf
Baseline
1 : 4 : 1
Concrete density = 100 pcf Panel weight = 25 psf
New Design
.3D Printed Mold
Building Elevation
Cornice
3-1
Cornice Cross Section
3D Printing CNC Finishing Current Assembly Process
3D Printed Mold Prototype
Courtesy of THERMWOOD
Tom Culp Birchpoint Consulting
INNOVATIONS IN WINDOWS AND WINDOW ATTACHMENTS
THOMAS CULP, PH.D.
BETTER BUILDINGS SUMMIT
MAY 17, 2017
STRANGER THINGS: BUILDING MATERIALS OF THE FUTURE
TOPICS
Window Technology: What is the Latest & Greatest?
Window Technology: Coming Soon?
Window Attachments
NANOTECHNOLOGY
LOW-E COATED GLASS
15
LOW-E GLASS Low Emissivity coatings Transparent, microscopic coating which
reflects infrared heat. Reduces building energy usage by up to 25% by
reducing radiative heat loss. Reduces overall U-factor
(lower U-factor = more insulating) Can be designed to also control solar heat gain.
Heat
Silver
Silver
Silver
10 nm = 0.00000001 m
Triple Silver Low-E Coating
Glass Substrate
STATE OF THE ART - GLAZING Triple silver or even quad silver low-e coatings that
maximize visible light (VT) and minimize solar heat gain (SHGC) SHGC < 0.25 with VT > 60% along with the low U-factor
Triple glazing with low-e glass and either argon or krypton but still slow adoption
Roomside (4th surface) low-e coatings in double glazing Durable low-e coating based on either fluorine-doped tin oxide or
indium tin oxide (ITO) that can be used exposed to the room.
Uc = 0.20 Btu/hrft2F with argon
Uc = 0.18 Btu/hrft2F with argon
Traditional Low-e
Durable Low-e
or (0.12 with two low-e coatings)
STATE OF THE ART - FRAMING Over 90% of commercial buildings use aluminum framing
Structural performance Durability Wide spans with narrow sight lines Design flexibility Recyclability / sustainability
However, unbroken aluminum frames have high thermal conductivity.
Solution: introduce thermal barriers Low conductivity material, but maintain structural performance Polyurethane and polyamide based systems
17
STATE OF THE ART - FRAMING Double thermal barriers Wider thermal barriers Incorporation of composite materials New foam materials
Courtesy Azon, Technoform
DYNAMIC GLAZING Dynamic glazing: products that can reversibly change their optical
properties (SHGC, VT) Electrochromic in response to electrical voltage Thermochromic in response to temperature Photochromic in response to direct sunlight
Problem with traditional glazing: lower SHGC reduces cooling load higher SHGC reduces heating load higher VT can help daylighting lower VT helps glare / visual comfort
Static glazing forces a compromise to be made. Dynamic glazing allows SHGC and VT to be changed throughout the
day and season to optimize energy efficiency, peak loads, and daylighting/glare. 19
ELECTROCHROMIC DYNAMIC GLAZING Tungsten oxide based ceramic thin film low-e coating that changes
absorption in response to DC voltage.
SHGC range 0.09 0.47, VT range 0.02 0.62 Controls: photosensor, occupancy, time of day / year, manual
20
DYNAMIC GLAZING EXAMPLES
21
Courtesy of SAGE Electrochromics
DYNAMIC GLAZING EXAMPLES
22
Courtesy of SAGE Electrochromics
BUILDING INTEGRATED PHOTOVOLTAICS (BIPV)
PV can be integrated into more than just rooftop panels Opaque areas, spandrel, dry screen Vision areas, overhead glazing Sun shades
Rooftop area can be very limited (tall buildings, mechanical equipment, etc)
South-facing vertical surfaces can provide 72% output of rooftop arrays
23
BIPV OPAQUE AREAS AND SUNSHADES
24
Courtesy of BISEM, Kawneer, Schuco
BIPV OVERHEAD GLAZING, VISION AREA
25
Courtesy of Hydro, Schuco, TSNergy
DAYLIGHT REDIRECTING Micro-prismatic films applied to clerestory windows to bring
daylight deeper into the space.
80% of incident light redirected upwards
Other approaches: light shelves, daylight louvers
Courtesy 3M Films
WINDOW TECHNOLOGY COMING SOON?
VACUUM INSULATION
Courtesy Dow Corning
~ R32 per inch
If punctured, still R8 per inch due to fumed silica core (similar to basic level aerogel)
CAN WE DO THE SAME IN GLASS? VACUUM GLAZING With vacuum + low-e coating, greatly reduces conduction,
convection, and radiative heat loss.
4 mm glass
0.3 mm vacuum
edge seal
support pillars
low-e coating
Uc ~ 0.10 Btu/hr ft2 F vs. 0.24 for double pane low-e argon unit and 1.0 for single pane
Can eliminate condensation Thin profile (8.3 mm) replace single
glazing in existing buildings? Challenges:
Tempering for use as safety glazing in doors, hazardous locations
Weathering durability for use in windows Cost
CAN WE DO THE SAME IN GLASS? VACUUM GLAZING Likely first widespread application will be in doors for
refrigerated display cases. Already used in windows in Japan and Europe, but small
market share. As cost decreases, hope to see increased use in both high end
new windows and replacing single glazing in existing buildings.
Courtesy LandGlass / VIG Technologies
THIN TRIPLE GLAZING Why has adoption of triple glazing been slow?
THIN TRIPLE GLAZING Potential new solution: thin light triples Use thin (0.7 mm) nonstructural glass lite in center
to create triple glazing with reduced weight. Potential drop-in solution without major frame redesign. Center of glass U-factor
with 2 low-e coatings Uc ~ 0.15 with argon Uc ~ 0.12 with krypton
Over last 4 years, Thin glass price dropped 88% Krypton net price dropped 80%
First use likely in residential Courtesy of Steve Selkowitz, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
WINDOW ATTACHMENTS AND EXISTING BUILDINGS
Existing frame and exterior single pane
Added low-e IG with hermetic seal
WHAT ABOUT EXISTING BUILDINGS? We often work hard on expensive new building
technology, then ignore the vast amount of energy wasted in existing buildings!
53% of commercial buildings have single glazing (2 billion ft2)
Over a 23 year period, only 6.7% replaced their windows
New cost-effective technologies to add low-e glazing to existing single pane windows
Low-e storm windows in residential buildings Low-e retrofit system or panels in commercial Case study in Philly has shown 40-60% reduced
energy use in perimeter zones, ~ 25% for overall building 34
courtesy of J.E. Berkowitz
WHAT ABOUT EXISTING BUILDINGS?
Low-E retrofit panels in multifamily, historic, commercial buildings where it may